[IMail Forum] Imail v9 = Collaboration Suite
Following to the german news on http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/52288 the next Imail version will be released as Collaboration Suite on october 25. So far so good. But what's about: The smallest Collaboration Suite license (25 Users, and Bitdefender AV Engine) will cost 1295 Euro + VAT Up to now Imail v8 SB has a basic cost of around the half of this price. Anyone has more information about this? Markus To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] spamskip.txt is this correct to allow these IP's?
200.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 200.1.1.3 255.255.255.255 200.1.1.23 255.255.255.255 200.1.1.25 255.255.255.255 200.1.1.26 255.255.255.255 200.1.1.250 255.255.255.255 200.1.1.251 255.255.255.255 200.1.1.253 255.255.255.255 I want to allow the following to skip spam checking in imail ... is this the correct format? Christopher Checca Packard Transport, Inc. IT Department 24021 South Municipal Dr PO Box 380 Channahon, IL. 60410 815 467 9260 815 467 6939 Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.packardtransport.com To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
Re: [IMail Forum] spamskip.txt is this correct to allow these IP's?
Spamskip.txt is created via the Trusted Addresses tab in V8.1x, so, yes, this appears to be the only way to specify from the GUI and how the file is written, when entering a single address. BTW, the separator between the IP and Mask appears to be a tab, not a space, if you are editing the file. Be sure there is a CRLF after each IP/Mask line. Daniel Donnelly - Original Message - From: Christopher Checca [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 10:58 AM Subject: [IMail Forum] spamskip.txt is this correct to allow these IP's? 200.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 200.1.1.3 255.255.255.255 200.1.1.23 255.255.255.255 200.1.1.25 255.255.255.255 200.1.1.26 255.255.255.255 200.1.1.250 255.255.255.255 200.1.1.251 255.255.255.255 200.1.1.253 255.255.255.255 I want to allow the following to skip spam checking in imail ... is this the correct format? Christopher Checca Packard Transport, Inc. IT Department 24021 South Municipal Dr PO Box 380 Channahon, IL. 60410 815 467 9260 815 467 6939 Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.packardtransport.com To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] spamskip.txt is this correct to allow these IP's?
I used the tab in the imail admin to enter all the addresses just to make sure. thanks Christopher Checca Packard Transport, Inc. IT Department 24021 South Municipal Dr PO Box 380 Channahon, IL. 60410 815 467 9260 815 467 6939 Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.packardtransport.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Donnelly Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 11:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] spamskip.txt is this correct to allow these IP's? Spamskip.txt is created via the Trusted Addresses tab in V8.1x, so, yes, this appears to be the only way to specify from the GUI and how the file is written, when entering a single address. BTW, the separator between the IP and Mask appears to be a tab, not a space, if you are editing the file. Be sure there is a CRLF after each IP/Mask line. Daniel Donnelly - Original Message - From: Christopher Checca [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 10:58 AM Subject: [IMail Forum] spamskip.txt is this correct to allow these IP's? 200.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 200.1.1.3 255.255.255.255 200.1.1.23 255.255.255.255 200.1.1.25 255.255.255.255 200.1.1.26 255.255.255.255 200.1.1.250 255.255.255.255 200.1.1.251 255.255.255.255 200.1.1.253 255.255.255.255 I want to allow the following to skip spam checking in imail ... is this the correct format? Christopher Checca Packard Transport, Inc. IT Department 24021 South Municipal Dr PO Box 380 Channahon, IL. 60410 815 467 9260 815 467 6939 Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.packardtransport.com To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] upgrading system box
I'm looking to upgrade our Imail box (Dell Optiplex, 600mhz, 256MB, Win2000). We get about 500K messages a month, so a solid desktop will do us. (Looking at Dell 3.2GHz, 1GB) Question: Since I only run Imail and Declude on the box, are there any issues that make XP or Win2000 a better operating system? (We have campus licenses for both, so cost and availability are not problems.) Thanks, John To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] OT: Sarbanes-Oxley
I am trying to clear up a debate about whether or not we are required to archive our incoming and outgoing email. We are owned by a public company and we do deal with financial transactions and peoples personal information. I cannot find a definitive answer on whether or not we have to archive email. The [EMAIL PROTECTED] at Deloitte Touche took 40 minutes to explain that he didnt know if we needed to or not. I will keep searching but if anyone can point me to some documention regarding this matter in would be greatly appreciated. Rick Davidson National Systems Manager North American Title Group - To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] OT: Sarbanes-Oxley
If you have or can find the resources, archive now and find the answer later. If you later find you do not have to, there is a key on your keyboard to correct what you did. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Davidson Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 11:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [IMail Forum] OT: Sarbanes-Oxley I am trying to clear up a debate about whether or not we are required to archive our incoming and outgoing email. We are owned by a public company and we do deal with financial transactions and peoples personal information. I cannot find a definitive answer on whether or not we have to archive email. The [EMAIL PROTECTED] at Deloitte Touche took 40 minutes to explain that he didnt know if we needed to or not. I will keep searching but if anyone can point me to some documention regarding this matter in would be greatly appreciated. Rick Davidson National Systems Manager North American Title Group - To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
Re: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box
John Carter wrote: I'm looking to upgrade our Imail box (Dell Optiplex, 600mhz, 256MB, Win2000). We get about 500K messages a month, so a solid desktop will do us. (Looking at Dell 3.2GHz, 1GB) Question: Since I only run Imail and Declude on the box, are there any issues that make XP or Win2000 a better operating system? (We have campus licenses for both, so cost and availability are not problems.) Unless they've changed something, XP is a workstation OS, and as such is limited to 10 client connection at a time. I don't know it that only applies to Windows network connections, or incoming connections for any service. If the debate is Windows Server 2003 vs. Windows server 2000, I'm not sure there's a big different either way, though I'd probably install on WinServer 2003 if given the choice. -- He made us believe a man could fly Christopher Reeve, 1952-2004 - Bud Durland, CNE Mold-Rite Plastics Network Administrator http://www.mrpcap.com - --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus / Sophos AV] To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
Re: [IMail Forum] OT: Sarbanes-Oxley
The incoming volume of mail is too high to just channel it to a mailbox and we have 7 Imail systems that will need to copy mail to an archive server. I'll keep lookin Rick Davidson National Systems Manager North American Title Group - - Original Message - From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 2:47 PM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: Sarbanes-Oxley If you have or can find the resources, archive now and find the answer later. If you later find you do not have to, there is a key on your keyboard to correct what you did. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Davidson Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 11:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [IMail Forum] OT: Sarbanes-Oxley I am trying to clear up a debate about whether or not we are required to archive our incoming and outgoing email. We are owned by a public company and we do deal with financial transactions and peoples personal information. I cannot find a definitive answer on whether or not we have to archive email. The [EMAIL PROTECTED] at Deloitte Touche took 40 minutes to explain that he didnt know if we needed to or not. I will keep searching but if anyone can point me to some documention regarding this matter in would be greatly appreciated. Rick Davidson National Systems Manager North American Title Group - To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
Re: [IMail Forum] OT: Sarbanes-Oxley
On Tuesday, October 19, 2004, 14:39:16, Rick Davidson wrote: I am trying to clear up a debate about whether or not we are required to archive our incoming and outgoing email. We are owned by a public company and we do deal with financial transactions and peoples personal information. Ask someone authoritative in your parent company (get in in writing). Then do what they say. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] The avalanche has already started, it is too Rod Dorman late for the pebbles to vote. Ambassador Kosh To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] OT: Sarbanes-Oxley
I expect you to receive a bill for the hour (.667 rounded up). Our last transaction with our old IP Lawyer was a .5 hour charge for receiving a voice mail! Anyhow, it looks to this layman as if your archives may be subpoenaed only if they exist. So, I changed to killing all logs at 1 week age, and archive nothing. If a user leaves it in a mailbox, well then it's on a backup tape too. Hurray for POP3! hth: REF: http://www.eff.org/osp/20040819_OSPBestPractices.pdf Dan Barker snip I will keep searching but if anyone can point me to some documention regarding this matter in would be greatly appreciated. Rick Davidson snip To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] OT: Sarbanes-Oxley
How much actually deals with client info (data that would need to be archived). We have an account which we email project related emails. We place a flag (###) where ### is some client number in the Subject line and an incomming and outgoing filter automagically copies the email to this account. Since we use Outlook as our email client, a dedicated machine collects the emails and rules file them into folders. Once a month we archive from this machine. Works for us but we probably don't have your volume. .rick.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Davidson Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 2:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] OT: Sarbanes-Oxley The incoming volume of mail is too high to just channel it to a mailbox and we have 7 Imail systems that will need to copy mail to an archive server. I'll keep lookin Rick Davidson National Systems Manager North American Title Group - - Original Message - From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 2:47 PM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: Sarbanes-Oxley If you have or can find the resources, archive now and find the answer later. If you later find you do not have to, there is a key on your keyboard to correct what you did. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Davidson Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 11:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [IMail Forum] OT: Sarbanes-Oxley I am trying to clear up a debate about whether or not we are required to archive our incoming and outgoing email. We are owned by a public company and we do deal with financial transactions and peoples personal information. I cannot find a definitive answer on whether or not we have to archive email. The [EMAIL PROTECTED] at Deloitte Touche took 40 minutes to explain that he didnt know if we needed to or not. I will keep searching but if anyone can point me to some documention regarding this matter in would be greatly appreciated. Rick Davidson National Systems Manager North American Title Group - To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box
The only reason we chose server over workstation was our antivirus insisted upon it. .rick.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bud Durland Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 2:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box John Carter wrote: I'm looking to upgrade our Imail box (Dell Optiplex, 600mhz, 256MB, Win2000). We get about 500K messages a month, so a solid desktop will do us. (Looking at Dell 3.2GHz, 1GB) Question: Since I only run Imail and Declude on the box, are there any issues that make XP or Win2000 a better operating system? (We have campus licenses for both, so cost and availability are not problems.) Unless they've changed something, XP is a workstation OS, and as such is limited to 10 client connection at a time. I don't know it that only applies to Windows network connections, or incoming connections for any service. If the debate is Windows Server 2003 vs. Windows server 2000, I'm not sure there's a big different either way, though I'd probably install on WinServer 2003 if given the choice. -- He made us believe a man could fly Christopher Reeve, 1952-2004 - Bud Durland, CNE Mold-Rite Plastics Network Administrator http://www.mrpcap.com - --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus / Sophos AV] To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box
I have Imail installed on a Dell server with Win2000SRV for Primary. Same hardware but WinXP Pro (not my idea) for the backup server. The main server, on the same hardware, is almost twice as fast at Declude/Fprot/Imail. Neither box runs anything else continually (the backup has a program that the boss uses that won't work on a server OS, but he only uses it once a month for about an hour). I don't have hard numbers to support it, but the difference is very obvious. To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box
I bet no one out ther was expecing that answer! what does you AV have to do with choosing the proper OS. Correct me if I am wrong but there is AV software available for all Windows versions. If your AV insists on workstation hten chang AV products. Use the proper tool for the job. I caught my 6 year old using a flat head screw driver the other day on a phillips head screw. He got it to work but messed up the screw in the process. Kevin Bilbee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rick Rambo Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 1:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box The only reason we chose server over workstation was our antivirus insisted upon it. .rick.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bud Durland Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 2:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box John Carter wrote: I'm looking to upgrade our Imail box (Dell Optiplex, 600mhz, 256MB, Win2000). We get about 500K messages a month, so a solid desktop will do us. (Looking at Dell 3.2GHz, 1GB) Question: Since I only run Imail and Declude on the box, are there any issues that make XP or Win2000 a better operating system? (We have campus licenses for both, so cost and availability are not problems.) Unless they've changed something, XP is a workstation OS, and as such is limited to 10 client connection at a time. I don't know it that only applies to Windows network connections, or incoming connections for any service. If the debate is Windows Server 2003 vs. Windows server 2000, I'm not sure there's a big different either way, though I'd probably install on WinServer 2003 if given the choice. -- He made us believe a man could fly Christopher Reeve, 1952-2004 - Bud Durland, CNE Mold-Rite Plastics Network Administrator http://www.mrpcap.com - --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus / Sophos AV] To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
Re[2]: [IMail Forum] OT: Sarbanes-Oxley
Anyhow, it looks to this layman as if your archives may be subpoenaed only if they exist. So, I changed to killing all logs at 1 week age, and archive nothing. SOX 802 specifically provides for prison time for deletion of data in contemplation of matters that _are not yet under_ investigation and matters _that may not yet have begun_ at the time a deletion policy took effect. If you are subject to SOX, an attempt to subvert future subpoenas by destroying all data could well land you in jail. As for statutes outside of SOX and NASD/SEC, the treatment may be far more lenient, but the question here was about SOX. --Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SpamAssassin plugs into Declude! http://www.mailmage.com/products/software/freeutils/SPAMC32/download/release/ Defuse Dictionary Attacks: Turn Exchange or IMail mailboxes into IMail Aliases! http://www.mailmage.com/products/software/freeutils/exchange2aliases/download/release/ http://www.mailmage.com/products/software/freeutils/ldap2aliases/download/release/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
Re: [IMail Forum] OT: Sarbanes-Oxley
I am trying to clear up a debate about whether or not we are required to archive our incoming and outgoing email. We are owned by a public company and we do deal with financial transactions and peoples personal information. I cannot find a definitive answer on whether or not we have to archive email. It is a certainty that if you are a wholly-owned subsidiary of a SOX-bound company, you too must comply with SOX regulations and archive all incoming and outgoing mail (as well as numerous other data-related compliance measures). If your parent company is subject to SOX, so are you. If they don't have a lawyer capable of confirming that they are following all applicable regulations, they need to get one. --Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SpamAssassin plugs into Declude! http://www.mailmage.com/products/software/freeutils/SPAMC32/download/release/ Defuse Dictionary Attacks: Turn Exchange or IMail mailboxes into IMail Aliases! http://www.mailmage.com/products/software/freeutils/exchange2aliases/download/release/ http://www.mailmage.com/products/software/freeutils/ldap2aliases/download/release/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
Re: [IMail Forum] OT: Sarbanes-Oxley
Ask someone authoritative in your parent company (get in in writing). contact the evil empire? Then do what they say. shiver :-) We try to stay completely autonomous from the parent company, not sure of the details but there were some anti-trust issues not too long ago. Sandy, thanks for the input, your responses reinforce what I am trying to convey to management. Rick Davidson National Systems Manager North American Title Group - - Original Message - From: Rod Dorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 3:14 PM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] OT: Sarbanes-Oxley On Tuesday, October 19, 2004, 14:39:16, Rick Davidson wrote: I am trying to clear up a debate about whether or not we are required to archive our incoming and outgoing email. We are owned by a public company and we do deal with financial transactions and peoples personal information. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] The avalanche has already started, it is too Rod Dorman late for the pebbles to vote. - Ambassador Kosh To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] Bogus Helo Issues
Dear List, My server is having problems delivering email to just one specific mail server. I can see that this server (64.202.166.12) had blakclisted my server, perhaps because it does not pass some helo checks. I have reviewed my configurations, and they look Ok: relay only for my local addresses, PTR records, etc. Is there something that I am overlooking, or perhaps It's just some misconfigurations in that server's anti-spam system? Any suggestions? Here is some of the log entries: 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) Trying businessrulesinc.com (0) 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) Connect businessrulesinc.com [64.202.166.12:25] (1) 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) 220 rblsmtpd.local 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) EHLO mail.webjogger.net 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) 250 rblsmtpd.local 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) 250 rblsmtpd.local 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) 553 204.8.81.2 mail rejected due to excessive spam (bogus helo matches rcpt aile@) 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) QUIT Regards Mario Antonio --- [This e-mail was scanned for viruses by Webjogger's AntiVirus Protection System] To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
Re: [IMail Forum] Bogus Helo Issues
Is there something that I am overlooking, or perhaps It's just some misconfigurations in that server's anti-spam system? It's probably something on their end: 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) EHLO mail.webjogger.net Your EHLO is fine. But: 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) 553 204.8.81.2 mail rejected due to excessive spam (bogus helo matches rcpt aile@) they claim that your mailserver is sending excessive spam -- but they also imply that the problem is that your HELO is bogus (which it isn't), and that your HELO matches rcpt aile@ (which makes no sense to someone who doesn't know what they are talking about). If they *did* configure their software properly (meaning that they want to reject your mail), they are giving you a nonsensical reason. -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers since 2000. Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver vulnerability detection. Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
Re: [IMail Forum] Bogus Helo Issues
10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) 553 204.8.81.2 mail rejected due to excessive spam (bogus helo matches rcpt aile@) The 'bogus helo' message may be irrelevant. What about the 'excessive spam' part? Have you searched your logs for 'aile@'? When you say 'relay only for my local addresses,' I presume you mean 'IP addresses,' as in the IMail setting, no? Just stabbing in the dark here...your HELO round-trips fine through DNS. --Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SpamAssassin plugs into Declude! http://www.mailmage.com/products/software/freeutils/SPAMC32/download/release/ Defuse Dictionary Attacks: Turn Exchange or IMail mailboxes into IMail Aliases! http://www.mailmage.com/products/software/freeutils/exchange2aliases/download/release/ http://www.mailmage.com/products/software/freeutils/ldap2aliases/download/release/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Bogus Helo Issues
Relay for local addresses, yippie, I can send out spam through your server. Oh, and hey, they will be confused because you have 4 MX records pointing at the same IP address. Even better, the PTR never matches the A record nor the HELO. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mario Antonio Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 1:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [IMail Forum] Bogus Helo Issues Dear List, My server is having problems delivering email to just one specific mail server. I can see that this server (64.202.166.12) had blakclisted my server, perhaps because it does not pass some helo checks. I have reviewed my configurations, and they look Ok: relay only for my local addresses, PTR records, etc. Is there something that I am overlooking, or perhaps It's just some misconfigurations in that server's anti-spam system? Any suggestions? Here is some of the log entries: 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) Trying businessrulesinc.com (0) 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) Connect businessrulesinc.com [64.202.166.12:25] (1) 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) 220 rblsmtpd.local 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) EHLO mail.webjogger.net 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) 250 rblsmtpd.local 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) 250 rblsmtpd.local 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) 553 204.8.81.2 mail rejected due to excessive spam (bogus helo matches rcpt aile@) 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) QUIT Regards Mario Antonio --- [This e-mail was scanned for viruses by Webjogger's AntiVirus Protection System] To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
Re: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] OT: Sarbanes-Oxley
Hi Dan, Sandy's post referes to this, if your a private company its probly ok, but its still best practice to keep a log history in case you need to cover your rear Sec. 802(a) Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States or any case filed under title 11, or in relation to or contemplation of any such matter or case, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both. Rick Davidson National Systems Manager North American Title Group - - Original Message - From: Sanford Whiteman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Dan Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 4:29 PM Subject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] OT: Sarbanes-Oxley Anyhow, it looks to this layman as if your archives may be subpoenaed only if they exist. So, I changed to killing all logs at 1 week age, and archive nothing. SOX 802 specifically provides for prison time for deletion of data in contemplation of matters that _are not yet under_ investigation and matters _that may not yet have begun_ at the time a deletion policy took effect. If you are subject to SOX, an attempt to subvert future subpoenas by destroying all data could well land you in jail. As for statutes outside of SOX and NASD/SEC, the treatment may be far more lenient, but the question here was about SOX. --Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SpamAssassin plugs into Declude! http://www.mailmage.com/products/software/freeutils/SPAMC32/download/release/ Defuse Dictionary Attacks: Turn Exchange or IMail mailboxes into IMail Aliases! http://www.mailmage.com/products/software/freeutils/exchange2aliases/download/release/ http://www.mailmage.com/products/software/freeutils/ldap2aliases/download/release/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
Re: [IMail Forum] Bogus Helo Issues
Scott, Thanks for your prompt reply. I will contac the net administrator in that company, sometimes it is tough to talk about these kind of misconfigurations, and get a good response. I will give it a try. Regards Mario Antonio - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 5:07 PM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Bogus Helo Issues Is there something that I am overlooking, or perhaps It's just some misconfigurations in that server's anti-spam system? It's probably something on their end: 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) EHLO mail.webjogger.net Your EHLO is fine. But: 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) 553 204.8.81.2 mail rejected due to excessive spam (bogus helo matches rcpt aile@) they claim that your mailserver is sending excessive spam -- but they also imply that the problem is that your HELO is bogus (which it isn't), and that your HELO matches rcpt aile@ (which makes no sense to someone who doesn't know what they are talking about). If they *did* configure their software properly (meaning that they want to reject your mail), they are giving you a nonsensical reason. -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers since 2000. Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver vulnerability detection. Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ --- [This e-mail was scanned for viruses by Webjogger's AntiVirus Protection System] --- [This e-mail was scanned for viruses by Webjogger's AntiVirus Protection System] To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
Re: [IMail Forum] Bogus Helo Issues
Sandy, Thanks for your comments. I will look for that string in my logs. Yes, (The SMTP security Tab in Imail) I relay mail just for our block of IP Addresses (our customers) Regards Mario Antonio - Original Message - From: Sanford Whiteman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mario Antonio [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 5:10 PM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Bogus Helo Issues 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) 553 204.8.81.2 mail rejected due to excessive spam (bogus helo matches rcpt aile@) The 'bogus helo' message may be irrelevant. What about the 'excessive spam' part? Have you searched your logs for 'aile@'? When you say 'relay only for my local addresses,' I presume you mean 'IP addresses,' as in the IMail setting, no? Just stabbing in the dark here...your HELO round-trips fine through DNS. --Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SpamAssassin plugs into Declude! http://www.mailmage.com/products/software/freeutils/SPAMC32/download/release/ Defuse Dictionary Attacks: Turn Exchange or IMail mailboxes into IMail Aliases! http://www.mailmage.com/products/software/freeutils/exchange2aliases/download/release/ http://www.mailmage.com/products/software/freeutils/ldap2aliases/download/release/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ --- [This e-mail was scanned for viruses by Webjogger's AntiVirus Protection System] --- [This e-mail was scanned for viruses by Webjogger's AntiVirus Protection System] To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
Re[2]: [IMail Forum] Bogus Helo Issues
Even better, the PTR never matches the A record nor the HELO. Actually: 10.4.18.64.in-addr.arpa name = webjogger.net.mail1.psmtp.com (That's for the MXs. The first hostname does match up, but the use of an outsourced MX provider is not related to the sending issues, in any case.) As for mail.webjogger.net (204.8.81.2), the outbound server in question, it matches up fine as well. --Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SpamAssassin plugs into Declude! http://www.mailmage.com/products/software/freeutils/SPAMC32/download/release/ Defuse Dictionary Attacks: Turn Exchange or IMail mailboxes into IMail Aliases! http://www.mailmage.com/products/software/freeutils/exchange2aliases/download/release/ http://www.mailmage.com/products/software/freeutils/ldap2aliases/download/release/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
Re: [IMail Forum] Bogus Helo Issues
John, Those configs are for incoming email (Postini stuff), Perhaps I am wrong but in the case of outgoing email, what matters is the PTR records of the host sending email. Regards Mario Antonio - Original Message - From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 5:16 PM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Bogus Helo Issues Relay for local addresses, yippie, I can send out spam through your server. Oh, and hey, they will be confused because you have 4 MX records pointing at the same IP address. Even better, the PTR never matches the A record nor the HELO. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mario Antonio Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 1:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [IMail Forum] Bogus Helo Issues Dear List, My server is having problems delivering email to just one specific mail server. I can see that this server (64.202.166.12) had blakclisted my server, perhaps because it does not pass some helo checks. I have reviewed my configurations, and they look Ok: relay only for my local addresses, PTR records, etc. Is there something that I am overlooking, or perhaps It's just some misconfigurations in that server's anti-spam system? Any suggestions? Here is some of the log entries: 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) Trying businessrulesinc.com (0) 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) Connect businessrulesinc.com [64.202.166.12:25] (1) 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) 220 rblsmtpd.local 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) EHLO mail.webjogger.net 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) 250 rblsmtpd.local 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) 250 rblsmtpd.local 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) 553 204.8.81.2 mail rejected due to excessive spam (bogus helo matches rcpt aile@) 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) QUIT Regards Mario Antonio --- [This e-mail was scanned for viruses by Webjogger's AntiVirus Protection System] To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ --- [This e-mail was scanned for viruses by Webjogger's AntiVirus Protection System] --- [This e-mail was scanned for viruses by Webjogger's AntiVirus Protection System] To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
Re: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box
Hey John, If you are speaking of using a desktop operating system for your IMail box, I HIGHLY recommend against it. If you are using a desktop OS now, that is probably why your performance might be degrading. You could actually take your existing box, upgrade the RAM (and hard drive if needed), upgrade the OS to a server OS (2000 or 2003) and see a significant improvement in performance. The difference between workstation and server OS makes a BIG difference. Prasad Devaprasad Kantharaj MIS Director, TVCCA -- Original Message -- From: John Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:28:37 -0500 I'm looking to upgrade our Imail box (Dell Optiplex, 600mhz, 256MB, Win2000). We get about 500K messages a month, so a solid desktop will do us. (Looking at Dell 3.2GHz, 1GB) Question: Since I only run Imail and Declude on the box, are there any issues that make XP or Win2000 a better operating system? (We have campus licenses for both, so cost and availability are not problems.) Thanks, John To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Bogus Helo Issues
True, but some mail servers are testing to see if settings match. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mario Antonio Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 2:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Bogus Helo Issues John, Those configs are for incoming email (Postini stuff), Perhaps I am wrong but in the case of outgoing email, what matters is the PTR records of the host sending email. Regards Mario Antonio - Original Message - From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 5:16 PM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Bogus Helo Issues Relay for local addresses, yippie, I can send out spam through your server. Oh, and hey, they will be confused because you have 4 MX records pointing at the same IP address. Even better, the PTR never matches the A record nor the HELO. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mario Antonio Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 1:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [IMail Forum] Bogus Helo Issues Dear List, My server is having problems delivering email to just one specific mail server. I can see that this server (64.202.166.12) had blakclisted my server, perhaps because it does not pass some helo checks. I have reviewed my configurations, and they look Ok: relay only for my local addresses, PTR records, etc. Is there something that I am overlooking, or perhaps It's just some misconfigurations in that server's anti-spam system? Any suggestions? Here is some of the log entries: 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) Trying businessrulesinc.com (0) 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) Connect businessrulesinc.com [64.202.166.12:25] (1) 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) 220 rblsmtpd.local 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) EHLO mail.webjogger.net 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) 250 rblsmtpd.local 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) 250 rblsmtpd.local 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) 553 204.8.81.2 mail rejected due to excessive spam (bogus helo matches rcpt aile@) 10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) QUIT Regards Mario Antonio --- [This e-mail was scanned for viruses by Webjogger's AntiVirus Protection System] To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ --- [This e-mail was scanned for viruses by Webjogger's AntiVirus Protection System] --- [This e-mail was scanned for viruses by Webjogger's AntiVirus Protection System] To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
Re: [IMail Forum] upgrading system box
Hi, Prasad brings it to the point. Use Windows 2003 Server, at least double the memory and your IMail server will be happy for the rest of its live. Am Mittwoch, 20. Oktober 2004 um 00:05 schrieben Sie: Hey John, If you are speaking of using a desktop operating system for your IMail box, I HIGHLY recommend against it. If you are using a desktop OS now, that is probably why your performance might be degrading. You could actually take your existing box, upgrade the RAM (and hard drive if needed), upgrade the OS to a server OS (2000 or 2003) and see a significant improvement in performance. The difference between workstation and server OS makes a BIG difference. Prasad Devaprasad Kantharaj MIS Director, TVCCA -- Original Message -- From: John Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:28:37 -0500 I'm looking to upgrade our Imail box (Dell Optiplex, 600mhz, 256MB, Win2000). We get about 500K messages a month, so a solid desktop will do us. (Looking at Dell 3.2GHz, 1GB) Question: Since I only run Imail and Declude on the box, are there any issues that make XP or Win2000 a better operating system? (We have campus licenses for both, so cost and availability are not problems.) Thanks, John To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ -- Mit freundlichen Grüssen Merlin Consulting Martin Schaible Bahnhofstrasse 27 CH-8702 Zollikon Phone: +41 1 391 30 00 Fax: +41 1 391 32 49 Mail:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] URL: http://www.merlinconsulting.ch Support: http://support.merlinconsulting.ch GPS: N47 20.235 E8 34.226 News - Neue Produkte: .:. Kiwi Syslog Monitor .:. Paessler GmbH .:. Sawmill Loganalyzer To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
