RE: [IMail Forum] Smart Phones
On my Win based Treo, I use the verizon wireless sync option to keep my phone and outlook synced up. The big advantage of that over both accessing POP3 is that when you delete and answer emails you can see those same results in both places. You do need to always have the desktop running though. To Unsubscribe: http://imailserver.com/support/discussion_list/ List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://imailserver.com/support/kb.html
[IMail Forum] OT: Best Domain Reseller Account
I'm looking for a good inexpensive domain reseller account. Don't need hosting services, don't want company advertsing stuff to my customers - just a simple interface to allow me to manage my customer domain registrations and renewals with a minimum of hassle and expense. Have about 200-300 domains to manage right now. Any suggestions (or warnings)...? To Unsubscribe: http://imailserver.com/support/discussion_list/ List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://imailserver.com/support/kb.html
[IMail Forum] ARF...
AOL is changing their feedback loops to use ARF. Any thoughts or suggestions on this... ARF is new to me. = ALERT: Your feedback loop is not in ARF (Abuse Reporting Format). Beginning September 2, 2008, all feedback loops will be converted to ARF. To learn more about how this will impact you, please read more about how AOL uses ARF at http://postmaster.aol.com/fbl/arfinfo.html. Also read the announcement of our plan to convert all feedback loops to ARF on our blog at http://journals.aol.com/pmtjournal/blog/entries/2008/06/27/aol-converting-al l-fbls-to-arf-on-9208/2977. Please make any necessary preparations to accept ARF feedback loops before the September 2, 2008 conversion. To change your existing non-ARF loops to ARF, fill out our online support form at http://postmaster.aol.com/waters/fbl_change_form.html. = To Unsubscribe: http://imailserver.com/support/discussion_list/ List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://imailserver.com/support/kb.html
[IMail Forum] SSL/TLS on IMAP...
I have a customer who want to utilize IMAP with SSL/TLS. I do not wantt o force all of my users to do this however. I currently use ver 8.22 What's involved in setting this up and are there any implications to doing so. I see there are check boxes on the IMAP services page: Enable Dedicated SSL Listener on port (993) Enable TLS Disable unsecure login I assume I also need as SSL certificate on the server where do I need to configure that. Thanks. To Unsubscribe: http://imailserver.com/support/discussion_list/ List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://imailserver.com/support/kb.html
[IMail Forum] Mail Not Getting to YAHOO (from Webmessaging)
We are using Imail 8.22 with declude. If a user receives mail from any YAHOO account and then responds with Web-Messaging to that user they get the following error messge: undeliverable to ~~~yahoo username~~~ anyyahoouser@yahoo.com Body of message generated response: 554 delivery error: dd This user doesn't have a yahoo.com account (~~YAHOO USERNAME~~ anyyahoouser@yahoo.com) [0] - mta367.mail.re4.yahoo.com It DOES NOT seem to have the same result when the same message is replied to with Outlook - it goes thru and is delivered. The Yahoo address does exist. Yahoo's website (http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/mail/postmaster/postmaster-01.html) quotes this exact message and says it is because the user does not exist which is clearly wrong. It must have something to do with the web-messaging interface since the same message replied to with outlook works fine... Any Ideas. To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Move Domain from Mailboxes to store/forward Gateway
Hi Ted, I do have domains left in Imail. I have since removed the HOSTS entry and changed the MX record to send mail directly to the WinSBS server and outside mail goes there (at least the ones that see the DNS change already). Our queued mail or any new mail I send directly though my server is still not getting delivered. I turned on verbose logging for a bit and here is a snippet: 20071205 154217 127.0.0.1 SMTP (c23901a11156) processing E:\IMail\spool\qc23901a11156.smd 20071205 154217 127.0.0.1 SMTP (c23901a11156) [x] looking up altoinc.com in HOSTS and MX 20071205 154217 127.0.0.1 SMTP (c23901a11156) Info - Found altoinc.com in DNS Cache 20071205 154217 127.0.0.1 SMTP (c23901a11156) Trying altoinc.com (0) 20071205 154217 127.0.0.1 SMTP (c23901a11156) [x] Connecting socket to service SMTP on host altoinc.com using protocol tcp 20071205 154217 127.0.0.1 SMTP (c23901a11156) [x] using source IP for mail.sbsnet.com [63.147.233.20] 20071205 154217 127.0.0.1 SMTP (c23901a11156) Info - Found altoinc.com in DNS Cache 20071205 154238 127.0.0.1 SMTP (c23901a11156) MX connect fail 74.92.94.105 20071205 154238 127.0.0.1 SMTP (c23901a11156) Info - Adding altoinc.com to temporary skip list 20071205 154238 127.0.0.1 SMTP (c23901a11156) requeuing E:\IMail\spool\qc23901a11156.smd R0 T25 20071205 154238 127.0.0.1 SMTP (c23901a11156) finished E:\IMail\spool\qc23901a11156.smd status=3 I had flushed the Temporary skip list and DNS cache a few times. I can connect directly to 74.92.94.105 using telnet to send an email from the mailserver though. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of tnichols Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 3:47 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Move Domain from Mailboxes to store/forward Gateway Jim, Do you have any domains left on the IMail box? If not you will need to create at least a dummy domain. As for the problem, what do the logs have to say? Ted Nichols IMail QA -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Comerford Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 11:48 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Move Domain from Mailboxes to store/forward Gateway Hi I host a domain and used to have mailboxes for the domain. I now want to act as a gateway to a small business server setup. Here is what I did: 1. Deleted host in Imail 2. added a line in the HOSTS file: 111.222.333.444 newdomain.com 3. restarted SMTP, QUEUE MGR services The mail gets accepted by imail, but stays in the queue. I can telnet to the 111.222.333.444 address and send a mail, but the mail in the queue does not seem to be getting sent... any Ideas on what to check next? Thanks in Advance Jim To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] Move Domain from Mailboxes to store/forward Gateway
Hi I host a domain and used to have mailboxes for the domain. I now want to act as a gateway to a small business server setup. Here is what I did: 1. Deleted host in Imail 2. added a line in the HOSTS file: 111.222.333.444 newdomain.com 3. restarted SMTP, QUEUE MGR services The mail gets accepted by imail, but stays in the queue. I can telnet to the 111.222.333.444 address and send a mail, but the mail in the queue does not seem to be getting sent... any Ideas on what to check next? Thanks in Advance Jim To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] Requeue... which order to copy back files.
When I rename the spool to fix a backup of mail, which files do I copy back first and then copy which files a few at a time...
RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] Using Root as mean of spamming
I've been doing this manually whenever I add a domain... Is there a setting somewhere which will cause it to use a new default? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 9:53 PM To: Jeff Hitchcock Subject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] Using Root as mean of spamming This can be solved rather easily by assigning the default root account a complex password at domain creation, right? Yes. --Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SpamAssassin plugs into Declude! http://www.imprimia.com/products/software/freeutils/SPAMC32/download/release / Defuse Dictionary Attacks: Turn Exchange or IMail mailboxes into IMail Aliases! http://www.imprimia.com/products/software/freeutils/exchange2aliases/downloa d/release/ http://www.imprimia.com/products/software/freeutils/ldap2aliases/download/re lease/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] 2 Char Email Addres...?
In using ver 8.22 I have a customer who wants a 2 char email address... the interface says it must be three, but I think I remember there was some way around this, perhaps a registry trick... I figured I would check with the list before I experiment... -Jim
[IMail Forum] APEWS.org
Should I be concerned that we are listed on APEWS.org ? When looking up Our mailserver (63.147.233.20) on there, we see this: Entry matching your Query: E-202474 63.144.0.0/12 _ CASE: C-130 One or more bots in ASN / CIDR, unprofessional / negligent owner _ History: Entry created 2007-06-04 It seems a bit heavy handed to block at that high a level, presumable because our provider, QWEST, has a spammer on a different IP Block than us - I also do not see a way to contact them to be removed... any thoughts Thanks, Jim
[IMail Forum] Attachments Safari
We are running Imail 8.22. I have very few mac users who use webmail. One is complaining that attachments are not being downloaded properly from webmail with his Safari browser. They download as gibberish... is there some known issues with Safari on this version of webmail?
[IMail Forum] Putting files back in queue...?
Had a problem that caused many many files to back up in queue... I renamed the spool file and system is running fine. I want to reintroduce filed to queue but I forget what order to copy the files there... Please advise It is copy all Q files then add D a few at a time or is it Copy all D and add Q a few at a time?
RE: [IMail Forum] OT: SSL Cert's
have used Comodo (instantssl.com) - they also have a reseller program - been happy with them, including support and replacing the SSL certs due to system problem or move (many others charge for re-issue). _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Polselli Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 11:49 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] OT: SSL Cert's Someone here mentioned RapidSSL.com for SSL cert's, they are a lot cheaper then Verisign. But in searching the net, godaddy.com has one for $19.99 per year, and another for $89.99 per year. Has anyone used RapidSSL or GoDaddy and had good luck? Any problems with using them? What do others use? Thanks, Anthony Polselli Matrix Information Systems, Inc. Phone: (858) 202-0300
[IMail Forum] IMAP Issue
Got a strange one for you to ponder. Use Imail 8.22 To host this domain. Have a user A using IMAP. User A account works fine with Outlook (using IMAP). When user A accesses his mail from a Motorola Q Phone thru verizon using IMAP, he gets the headers just fine, but gets an error when trying to open a message: Failed to connect to incoming mail server. Check your user name and password and try again. Another user B on same domain with same phone does NOT have any problems with his account. If User B sets up the user A account on User B's phone it gets the same message. I have turned on IMAP DEBUG LOGGING and gathered some data - bUT I really don't know what to look for... any thoughts or Ideas. In looking thru logs I see one line that catches my eye, but again: 20061129 145538 127.0.0.1 IMAP4 (12AC) sending A12 BAD UID Invalid Syntax After this the user logs off Could this tell me something, or does nyone have any Idea what else to look for? Thanks, Jim To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] IMAP Issue
User A is 9chars@14chars.com User B is 5chars@14chars.com As for IMAP-IDLE mentioned in another post... User A and B are setup identically except for email address/password. -Jim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rod Dorman Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 4:04 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] IMAP Issue On Wednesday, November 29, 2006, 15:30:56, Jim Comerford wrote: ... User A account works fine with Outlook (using IMAP). When user A accesses his mail from a Motorola Q Phone thru verizon using IMAP, he gets the headers just fine, but gets an error when trying to open a message: Failed to connect to incoming mail server. Check your user name and password and try again. Another user B on same domain with same phone does NOT have any problems with his account. If User B sets up the user A account on User B's phone it gets the same message. I have turned on IMAP DEBUG LOGGING and gathered some data - bUT I really don't know what to look for... any thoughts or Ideas. In looking thru logs I see one line that catches my eye, but again: 20061129 145538 127.0.0.1 IMAP4 (12AC) sending A12 BAD UID Invalid Syntax After this the user logs off Could this tell me something, or does nyone have any Idea what else to look for? I'm assuming the actual user ids are not A and B but are something more complex. There may be some length limitation or punctuation character that causes the A name to not work on that model of phone. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] The avalanche has already started, it is too Rod Dorman late for the pebbles to vote. - Ambassador Kosh To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] It is worth it to buy the SA?
I also feel the need to add my "Me Too" to this thread, so IPswitch will not think there is only a few that are dissatisfied. I too have been lured into extending my SA in hopes of a stable product coming out to upgrade to - ipswitch even acknowledged their screwup early on and offered an extra few months to the SA's of those who renewed... unfortunately those few extra months were not nearly enough. IPSwitch should really smarten up and release a fix for 8.22 - After All the codebase cannot be all that much different if the same vulnerability is in 2006.1 too. Kevin, see if you cannot make Imail step back and gather some sanity and issue a 8.22 patch. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason LovenSent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 8:44 AMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] It is worth it to buy the SA? Im going to weigh in on this at this point as well just so my vote is registered on the off chance Ipswitch is monitoring this thread Based on the fact that I havent heard of an update even being reviewed for the 8.2x line I am currently researching alternative mail hosting platforms. I was originally holding off installing 2006 until it got stable but having a situation where I am now the proud owner of a system that was installed less than 2 years ago with a major vulnerability announced I am very angry that Ipswitch is leaving us hanging on this. This is a core business option for us and certainly failures in it are high profile and damaging for us. People will not be happy if they cant get their email because the server got owned by some script kiddie. Its inexcusable for a commercial software vendor to NOT weigh in on this as soon as it was announced either to denounce the vuln or to accept responsibility and at least provide a patch for the mainstream versions of their software. Im sure that the majority of Imail sites are not running 2006. How could they with how unstable it has been? -Jason From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gil GomesSent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 8:37 AMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] It is worth it to buy the SA? I've been lurking in the weeds watching this discussion very quickly pick up momentum. I thought I was internally over-reacting in my perception that Ipswitch has become dollar driven to the point that it's obviously become detrimental to their client base. Apparently that isn't just my opinion. I've forced myself, for the past five months, to use the webmail client that came with iMAIL 2006.03. There are some issues that I just find mind boggling. For example... 1) When I hit the key, I get double spaced. That's a very handy feature if you're interested in double spacing every line in every email. 2) The sent folder, at a glance, shows that all of the mail was sent from me, but not who it was sent to.How does that happen? Is that what Ipswitch QA thought their customers wanted? There are issues with attachments that I've been questioning for months, with no answer. I asked one of our sales correspondents to use this client as it would solve a number of his problems. After two weeks he explained that he'd much rather live with the myriad of problems he was previously encumbered with than to have to use this slow, buggy, irritating client. He also mentioned the fact that the main screen constantly popped in front of the "New Message" screen while he was typing a longish email... Another wonderful feature... Is Ipswitch purposely under staffing for this product? Does it have programmers with the wrong mindset putting this together? Something is obviously going on over there that's making it difficult to put out a quality product... bye for now...-Gil -Original Message-From: "Rick Hogue" Sent 10/25/2006 7:11:04 AMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] It is worth it to buy the SA? With Microsoft, you are not paying an annual service agreement over and above the purchase price. In this instance Windows 95 is not a good example nor would Windows 2000 as they both are much older products than version 8.x of IMail. Also, if those companies who had the keys had service agreements with their clients then yes they should be required to produce software to alleviate the need for the parallel port. I may be mistaken but I seem to recall some court cases against Microsoft that ended up requiring them to support software up to 4 years from its creation and to maintain patches for the software for a 4 year period from the time of the following upgrade. But then again I could be mistaken. The problem with the version 8.x Imail server also effects version 2006. 2006 is a massive rewrite with minor changes made to certain parts of the code. I think Ipswitch got caught with two generations of the product having problems and is not capable of handling
[IMail Forum] ERR domain read open fail
I am increasingly seeing these messages in my log files... Currently see about a dozen per day. For the most part these are POP3 accounts and the message seems to get delivered on a retry. Today however we had an IMAP user receive one of these messages at the same time their entire main.mbx disappeared. Imail must have created a new main.mbx and kept chugging along, but a couple of hundred email mesasges in that account were nowhere to be found (except on backup). My question is why is this error being generated in the first place, and when it is is the whole mailbox always being regenerated? With our usage pattern on the POP3 accounts it is possible that that is happening and we never noticed - it may have taken the IMAP account to make it noticed this time. We have no active virus scanning on the mail server (except fprot thru declude) or any other processes running that would be accessing the mailbox files other than Imail (Version 8.22 btw, on windows server 2003) Any Ideas or solutions. Here is a snippet of the log with domain and user changed to "changed" --- 20061023 122740 127.0.0.1 SMTP (ed6801cdffd5) ERRchanged.com read open fail (E:\IMail\changed_com\Users\changed\main.mbx)20061023 122740 127.0.0.1 SMTP (ed6801cdffd5) ERR local fail tochanged.com changed-main (310)user@domain.com 020061023 122740 127.0.0.1 SMTP (ed6801cdffd5) Creating message from Postmaster20061023 122740 127.0.0.1 SMTP (ed6801cdffd5) Delivery process now using new file: ed7c0cf086b920061023 122740 127.0.0.1 SMTP (ed6801cdffd5) requeuing E:\IMail\spool\qed6801cdffd5.smd R0 T020061023 122740 127.0.0.1 SMTP (ed6801cdffd5) finished E:\IMail\spool\qed6801cdffd5.smd status=3
RE: [IMail Forum] ERR domain read open fail
Thats not it - I have hundreds of GB. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists)Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 4:59 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] ERR domain read open fail First most obvious question is what is free space like on the mail box partition? John T eServices For You "Seek, and ye shall find!" -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim ComerfordSent: Monday, October 23, 2006 12:43 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] ERR domain read open fail I am increasingly seeing these messages in my log files... Currently see about a dozen per day. For the most part these are POP3 accounts and the message seems to get delivered on a retry. Today however we had an IMAP user receive one of these messages at the same time their entire main.mbx disappeared. Imail must have created a new main.mbx and kept chugging along, but a couple of hundred email mesasges in that account were nowhere to be found (except on backup). My question is why is this error being generated in the first place, and when it is is the whole mailbox always being regenerated? With our usage pattern on the POP3 accounts it is possible that that is happening and we never noticed - it may have taken the IMAP account to make it noticed this time. We have no active virus scanning on the mail server (except fprot thru declude) or any other processes running that would be accessing the mailbox files other than Imail (Version 8.22 btw, on windows server 2003) Any Ideas or solutions. Here is a snippet of the log with domain and user changed to "changed" --- 20061023 122740 127.0.0.1 SMTP (ed6801cdffd5) ERRchanged.com read open fail (E:\IMail\changed_com\Users\changed\main.mbx)20061023 122740 127.0.0.1 SMTP (ed6801cdffd5) ERR local fail tochanged.com changed-main (310)[EMAIL PROTECTED] 020061023 122740 127.0.0.1 SMTP (ed6801cdffd5) Creating message from Postmaster20061023 122740 127.0.0.1 SMTP (ed6801cdffd5) Delivery process now using new file: ed7c0cf086b920061023 122740 127.0.0.1 SMTP (ed6801cdffd5) requeuing E:\IMail\spool\qed6801cdffd5.smd R0 T020061023 122740 127.0.0.1 SMTP (ed6801cdffd5) finished E:\IMail\spool\qed6801cdffd5.smd status=3
RE: [IMail Forum] Any updates on 2006.1 release
I too would be particularly interested if anyone has upgraded from 8.22 up to 2006.1 with success (or otherwise). From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David LarocheSent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 3:55 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] Any updates on 2006.1 release Be glad to hear of anyone's experiences with updates to 2006.1Dave Laroche, La Salle Academy, Providence, RI-Original Message-From: "Ravi Reddy" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent 9/7/2006 1:25:56 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] Any updates on 2006.1 releaseHi,I did not see any posts lately on the performance of 2006.1 release. Please forward any comments or gotcha's as we are getting ready to update tomorrow.Ravi ReddyCompunet Services, Inc.Sent via the WebMail system at mail.csnet.comTo Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.htmlList Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] WAY OT: Scheduled FTP download
I need to have one of my servers download a text file from a password protected FTP site once a day and store it in a specified directory. What would you guys use for this? No bells/whistles needed cheap/free would be good. Thanks, Jim To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] WAY OT: Scheduled FTP download
Thanks for all the replies. The windows command line ftp withscheduler seems to do the job. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin BilbeeSent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 4:17 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] WAY OT: Scheduled FTP download ftp.exe and the windows scheduler. Kevin Bilbee From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity HostingSent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 12:44 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] WAY OT: Scheduled FTP download asp or coldfusion can do this. In CF you can set a scheduled task. I'm sure WSFTP or something similar could as well but they would have to be running.Jim Comerford wrote: I need to have one of my servers download a text file from a passwordprotected FTP site once a day and store it in a specified directory. Whatwould you guys use for this? No bells/whistles needed cheap/free would begood.Thanks,JimTo Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.htmlList Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] Delivery error
Title: Delivery error In this example a user on our server (AUSER) sent mail to a external and an internal (BUSER) recipient. The external was not delivered and seems to have been rejected by our server.. can anyone shed some light on what is happening here? 20060504 171037 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (6dcd0093b845) [63.147.233.20] connect 12.1.55.242 port 56965 20060504 171037 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (6dcd0093b845) [12.1.55.242] EHLO targetwslv 20060504 171037 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (6dcd0093b845) [targettrans.com] in white list 20060504 171037 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (6dcd0093b845) [targettrans.com] in white list 20060504 171037 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (6dcd0093b845) [12.1.55.242] MAIL FROM: AUSER@targettrans.com 20060504 171037 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (6dcd0093b845) [12.1.55.242] RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20060504 171037 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (6dcd0093b845) [12.1.55.242] ERR mail.sbsnet.com invalid user [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20060504 171037 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (6dcd0093b845) [12.1.55.242] RCPT TO: BUSER@targettrans.com 20060504 171038 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (6dcd0093b845) [12.1.55.242] E:\IMail\spool\D6dcd0093b845.SMD 49414 20060504 171039 127.0.0.1 SMTP (6dcd0093b845) processing E:\IMail\spool\q6dcd0093b845.smd 20060504 171042 127.0.0.1 SMTP (6dcd0093b845) ldeliver targettrans.com BUSER-main (1) AUSER@targettrans.com 49420 20060504 171042 127.0.0.1 SMTP (6dcd0093b845) finished E:\IMail\spool\q6dcd0093b845.smd status=1 Thanks, Jim
RE: [IMail Forum] Webmail time is different than Server
Timezone issue on machine you are browsing from? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Parsons Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 4:41 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Webmail time is different than Server Upgraded to 2006.3 on Friday and since then the time on the server is correct but in Webmail it is an hour ahead. Any ideas? TIA Eric Parsons --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude] To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Webmail time is different than Server
One perhaps set to account for daylight savings time and one not? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Parsons Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 5:43 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Webmail time is different than Server They are same as the server -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Comerford Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 4:39 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Webmail time is different than Server Timezone issue on machine you are browsing from? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Parsons Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 4:41 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Webmail time is different than Server Upgraded to 2006.3 on Friday and since then the time on the server is correct but in Webmail it is an hour ahead. Any ideas? TIA Eric Parsons --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude] To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude] To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] Possible Killer Message...?
Hi, I got the followng message and lines in the log file - perhaps someone knows what it means. BTW: Still on 8.22 (not brave enough to upgrade yet) Got Postmaster Message: -- IMail detected a fatal error while attempting delivery. The messages causing this error have been orphaned in the IMail spool directory. Please contact Ipswitch Technical Support. In Logs: --- 20060208 163022 127.0.0.1 SMTP () ERR 071 - Max renames, possible killer message, message(s) orphaned 20060208 163022 127.0.0.1 SMTP () Info - Queue manager started 20060208 163022 127.0.0.1 SMTP () Sending orphan file message Any Idea what this means? Also how do I know which files are orphaned from this log entry. Other than this message, everything seems to be working fine. -Jim To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Rule help needed
To catch just the [WO- part this will work : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I think you can work further by doing something like this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The second one I'm not that sure about syntax to catch the 8 digits and 4 digits, but their rule description is here: http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-19980116-DD08.htm -Jim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Funaro Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 11:10 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Rule help needed Nobody wants to tackle this one, eh? Bet you are all as busy as I am :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Funaro Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 11:52 AM To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Rule help needed Hi Everyone, I'm about to impose... I just don't have the time to figure out how to create these rules, and experiment until I get them right... So I come to you outstanding gurus... (lucky you!) We're running iMail 7.15, and I assume that I'll both an inbound and outbound rule, at the domain level, to do what I need. What we have is a work order system, and the work order IDs end up in the subject lines of our messages. The format for the work order id is: [WO--] Where n is any digit from 0 to 9. Eventually the messaging will be handled entirely by the work order system, but we always anticipate adding properly formatted Work Order IDs into the subject lines of messages sent OUTSIDE the work order system too. These rules would work for both. We'd like to trap any messages that have a work order id anywhere in the subject line, and COPY the message to a mailbox, [EMAIL PROTECTED] The message should still go to the destination... we just want to have a copy of it to the special mailbox for pickup by the work order system for additional tracking. This goes for messages that come IN to the domain (replies from customers) as well as messages that go OUT through our domain (messages TO customers). Is there a rule that can do what I need, and if so, would someone be willing to supply it to me, 'cause I'm on a tight deadline? I'd really appreciate it, and totally owe you a beer (or a sparkling grape juice, if drinkin's not your thing :) Thanks, Marc To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] rule needed
This rule will search for domain.com in the headers of the message, and redirect it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: H~domain\.com:[EMAIL PROTECTED] See: http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-19980116-DD08.htm for more. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Katherine Kennedy Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 10:17 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: FW: [IMail Forum] rule needed No answer? Does that mean there is no support in the rules for this? I have an issue I am trying to come up with a fix for and I need some input. Is there any way to search for specific groups of characters in a word? I do appreciate any feed back... K -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Katherine Kennedy Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 4:13 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] rule needed I need a rule that will parse out specific character groups from a word group. Example: any email that contains in the header domain.com. As the headers will be [EMAIL PROTECTED], Thank you Kat To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] New IMail 2006 Pricing
Kevin, Am I understanding your explanation correctly...? The user limit is the limit of how many users in ANY ONE domain can have, not cumulative? So if I host 100 domains with 5 users each would this be 500 users - the way I am reading your reply below, I could have a 25 user version in this scenario... Is this correct? Jim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Gillis Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 9:29 PM To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] New IMail 2006 Pricing Hello Jacques, It's actually a little more lenient than that. You can't have more than 25 users in any single domain. So you could have up to 25 in each of your 3 domains, if you so desired, simultaneously, equating to 75 users total. bye for now, kg -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jacques Brouwers Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 8:36 PM To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] New IMail 2006 Pricing Hi Kevin, Thanks for the info. So if I have this correct I could use the 25 user license with 3 domains so long as I don't go over 25 mailboxes combined between all three domains? In my set up two of the domains I just forward to an exchange server with ~180 aliases and there is only one administrative box with web access for each domain. The third domain has only 18 mailboxes. Thanks, Jacques -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Gillis Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 3:29 PM To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] New IMail 2006 Pricing Hi Dan, Good question. Correct, there is no limit on Domains on IMail Server 2006. Aliases do not count as users, so you can have unlimited Domains, Aliases and Lists. A single user can have POP and IMAP and Web access and it counts as 1 user. A user is, technically, anyone that can both send AND receive email. An alias can receive but can't send and hence does not count as a user. bye for now, kg -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dan Barker Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 3:44 PM To: imail_forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] New IMail 2006 Pricing Finally, they've said what they mean! Hurray! Now, if they'd define the term user, that would be nice. I appears that there is no limit on domains (although I'd prefer to see it specifically stated), but does an Alias count? does a List count? Is a user the number of pop3 logins in any 24-hour period? What? My site might need 100, 250 or 1000 user pricing, depending on how they count. Dan Barker -Original Message- From: Ipswitch, Inc. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 3:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: New IMail 2006 Pricing Greetings, With the upcoming release of IMail Server 2006, Ipswitch will be re-introducing IMail as a standalone product with new tiered pricing. To see the new pricing, visit our IMail preview page: http://www.ipswitch.com/IMailPricing Through November 28, you may be able to save money and receive a 3 month extension by purchasing the existing one-year Service Agreement at the current rate of $695. (Your serial number: IP-00400708) Visit our web site for details: http://www.ipswitch.com/IMailPricing Your serial number is IP-00400708. With an active Service Agreement, you'll receive a free upgrade to IMail Server 2006 with unlimited users, lists and domains. IMail Server 2006 will include new web messaging, web administration and more. Purchase and activate a new IMail Professional Service Agreement before Nov. 28, 2005 and we'll also give you an additional 3 months of service -- free! If you already have a Service Agreement, you can renew your existing agreement today and extend your service period by a total of fifteen months. Happy holidays, The IMail Team __ Ipswitch occasionally sends out marketing messages to our mailing list. You have the option of removing [EMAIL PROTECTED] from our marketing list at http://www.ipswitch.com/remove.asp Ipswitch, Inc. - 10 Maguire Road - Lexington, MA 02421 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive:
RE: [IMail Forum] Would someone please test our server?
See: http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=cydian.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Ulrich Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 9:51 AM To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Would someone please test our server? We just moved to our new NOC, new IP block, etc. It seems everything is working but we are getting calls from people re: undeliverable / bounced messages. I haven't had one who sent it in yet, so I can't diagnose. We did shorten our TTL very short and made the transition two days ago. I don't know if there are some name servers caching old data, if we have a reverse lookup problem, etc Any indication would be GREATLY appreciated. Thanks Chris To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [spam-bl] [IMail Forum] Spam attempting place Phel Trojan on PCs
Would the following line in rules.ima be the best way to block these? S!~fnucp\.lastrez\.com:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 3:54 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com; IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [spam-bl] [IMail Forum] Spam attempting place Phel Trojan on PCs We received many spams today directing us to the following web site. Going to the site attempts to load the Trojan.Phel. I would suggest blocking this domain in any way possible. http://www.fnucp.lastrez.com Kevin Bilbee Network Administrator Standard Abrasives, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changing the way industry works. To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ --- To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] My company is in the URL domain blacklist
I wonder if anyone has a good whitelist to share. Using antispamseeder with the -l -e switches you can exclude urls from the list. There is a utility by curt turner on ipswitch site which helps do the same But removing all of the bad listings in the Ipswitch blacklist takes a lot of time. If someone has already fixed the ipswitch list and has a comprehensive whitelist it sure would be a timesaver. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 8:09 PM To: imail_forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] My company is in the URL domain blacklist Hi everyone, I just started to implement the built-in spam filter in Imail. I downloaded the latest zip file and was looking through the URL domain blacklist text file and the company I work for, Xanga.com, is on it. We don't send out spam, we send out email subscriptions because our users signs up for them. I'm curious how did my company ended up on there. I think I read it somewhere that Ipswitch doesn't maintain the list. I just want everyone to know that we don't send out spam and don't block us please. Thanks, Jon To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] 2 letter Usernames
It used to be that 2 letter domain names were supported by Imail. Then a later version of the admin interface set a minimum of three letters, but one could use the command line interface to create one of two letters. In the latest version, that no longer seems to be the case. I created a three character name and went into the registry and changed it to 2 letters. Sending mail to that account works, and can be forwarded, but trying to login via the web-based or the pop3 interface does not seem to work. Is this simply not possible to do anymore, or am I just missing something in the registry? To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] Move Mailboxes.
I want to move my mailboxes drive from using c:\imail to using d:\imail. A search of the archives found an article on how to change one domain by just changing it in the imail administrator screen, but did not find much else (I may not be searching for the right thing). One would assume you would need to stop services, move the directory structure, change it in Imail administrator screen, and then restart services. Will this in fact do the trick? Are the other issues to consider? To go one step further, I have quite a few domains defined (one with an ip, and ~50 virtual) so I'd really rather not have to go into each one and change it... Is there away to use the registry to do the same -- or are I asking for trouble doing it this way? Anyone have a checklist, or a link to an article on how to do this. Thanks, Jim To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] domain aliases
Ok, here goes I think these log entries are related to the domain alias problem. This user's domain is defined as a virtual domain as: PremiereOffices.com (note capitalization) A domain alias was setup PremierOffice.com (note capitalization and lack of e in middle) After 8.2 Upgrade - This user could no longer AUTH using the domain alias. The AUTH failure was appending the main hostname of the IP'ed domain onto the end of the domain alias which was trying to AUTH. See: 20050428 153331 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (3a8b027b03bd) [63.147.233.20] connect 66.153.1.131 port 52823 20050428 153331 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (3a8b027b03bd) [66.153.1.131] EHLO LPanuska 20050428 153331 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (3a8b027b03bd) FAILED authentication [EMAIL PROTECTED]@mail.sbsnet.com I added their IP address as an allowed relay and then they sent this message with the resulting log lines and 550 error. 20050428 162818 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (4762045b0a3b) [63.147.233.20] connect 66.153.1.131 port 53175 20050428 162818 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (4762045b0a3b) [66.153.1.131] MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20050428 162818 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (4762045b0a3b) [66.153.1.131] RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20050428 162818 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (4762045b0a3b) [x] looking up bellatlantic.net in HOSTS 20050428 162819 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (4762045b0a3b) [66.153.1.131] MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20050428 162819 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (4762045b0a3b) [66.153.1.131] RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20050428 162819 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (4762045b0a3b) [x] looking up bellatlantic.net in HOSTS 20050428 162819 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (4762045b0a3b) [66.153.1.131] E:\IMail\spool\D4762045b0a3b.SMD 39352 20050428 162819 127.0.0.1 SMTP (4762045b0a3b) processing E:\IMail\spool\Q4762045b0a3b.SMD 20050428 162819 127.0.0.1 SMTP (4762045b0a3b) Trying bellatlantic.net (0) 20050428 162819 127.0.0.1 SMTP (4762045b0a3b) Connect bellatlantic.net [206.46.232.11:25] (1) 20050428 162819 127.0.0.1 SMTP (4762045b0a3b) 220 sv10pub.verizon.net MailPass SMTP server v1.2.0 - 013105113116JY+PrW ready Thu, 28 Apr 2005 15:25:05 -0500 20050428 162819 127.0.0.1 SMTP (4762045b0a3b) EHLO mail.sbsnet.com 20050428 162819 127.0.0.1 SMTP (4762045b0a3b) 250-sv10pub.verizon.net 20050428 162819 127.0.0.1 SMTP (4762045b0a3b) 250-8BITMIME 20050428 162819 127.0.0.1 SMTP (4762045b0a3b) 250 SIZE 8388608 20050428 162819 127.0.0.1 SMTP (4762045b0a3b) MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 20050428 162820 127.0.0.1 SMTP (4762045b0a3b) 550 You are not allowed to send mail:sv10pub.verizon.net 20050428 162820 127.0.0.1 SMTP (4762045b0a3b) ERR undeliverable 550 You are not allowed to send mail:sv10pub.verizon.net 20050428 162820 127.0.0.1 SMTP (4762045b0a3b) SMTP_DELIV_FAILED 20050428 162820 127.0.0.1 SMTP (4762045b0a3b) QUIT 20050428 162820 127.0.0.1 SMTP (4762045b0a3b) 221 sv10pub.verizon.net closing connection 20050428 162820 127.0.0.1 SMTP (4762045b0a3b) Creating message from Postmaster 20050428 162820 127.0.0.1 SMTP (4762045b0a3b) Delivery process now using new file: 476401704747 20050428 162820 127.0.0.1 SMTP (4762045b0a3b) finished E:\IMail\spool\Q4762045b0a3b.SMD status=2 20050428 162820 127.0.0.1 SMTP (476401704747) processing E:\IMail\spool\Q476401704747.GSE 20050428 162820 127.0.0.1 SMTP (476401704747) ldeliver PremiereOffices.com lpanuska-main (1) 2603 20050428 162820 127.0.0.1 SMTP (476401704747) finished E:\IMail\spool\Q476401704747.GSE status=1 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean Kenworthy Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 8:24 PM To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] domain aliases We have identified a problem with using mixed case in the host the domain aliases. We are working quickly to fix this problem but for now if the user(s) having the problem will make sure to use all lower case in their SMTP AUTH and you should make sure your domain alias is saved as all lower case, the user should be ok. -Sean -- Original Message -- From: Jim Comerford [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 16:55:58 -0400 I think i may have found another little glitch in the new version... I have a domain called domaineoffices.com with a domain alias of domainoffices.com (note no e in middle on alias - this is a virtual domain). The user had been using the alias in the login name to both auth and login for mail. It worked fine until I upgraded. I see auth errors in the log where is say auth failed for user@domain[EMAIL PROTECTED] where the @mail.sbsnet.com was appended by Imail. anyone else see anything like
RE: [IMail Forum] Imail 8.2 and Mac clients
I also have a support incident open on this issue. My reply so far from ipswitch has been and I quote: I am not able to duplicate this problem using Outlook Express 6 for Windows (unfortunately, I have no Macintosh machines with which to test). Are the users experiencing issues entering their domain.com information with the same case as the Official Host Name and Host Alias information setup in IMail? Are you using an external database for this domain? For what its worth, it seems newer macs are not showing this problem based on user reports. It appears that the older ones that required user%domain.com as the username are failing. One Mac producing the problem has OS9 with Outlook Express 5, another had OS9 with Entourage 2001. The domain alias CASE issue the response refers to is unrelated to Mac's it seems but may apply in your case. From what I have seen though that would show an auth failure on user@example.com@your.iphost.name.com rather than the AUTH failure on your main Iped domain. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Horne Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 9:16 AM To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Imail 8.2 and Mac clients FYI, we are in the process of restoring our Imail installation to its 8.15 state. We have found that none of our clients using Macs are able to authenticate at all. Every one is being auth'ed as [EMAIL PROTECTED], which is our OHN. The one client that is being authed correctly as [EMAIL PROTECTED] is on an IP'ed host, and his auth is also failing. I have sent a message to Ipswitch support, but we can't wait and have to restore to get our clients back up and running. Dan Horne To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Imail 8.2 and Mac clients
I put the IP address of the client in my relay for address list which eliminates the need to AUTH, but in my case they happen to have static IP's... If they don't that will not help. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 10:40 AM To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Imail 8.2 and Mac clients So is there any workaround right now to get mail sent out? Travis -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Horne Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 7:16 AM To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Imail 8.2 and Mac clients I don't disagree with you at all. I do disagree (apparently with Kevin) that this has ANYTHING to do with CASE. My users have tested this and it doesn't work no matter the case. As Jim stated, the CASE situation results in an auth failure on user@example.com@my.ohn.com. My users are failing with an entirely different pattern: user@my.ohn.com, and I just hope Ipswitch doesn't ignore this problem, thinking that is the CASE problem when it is not. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Barnes Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 10:03 AM To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Imail 8.2 and Mac clients I spoke with a very knowledgeable person in Tech Support last night and, while there are several issues that must be resolved with 8.2, the biggest issue is that fact that there is a problem with managing the case of the username and domain name. The problem is this: In if someone's username is [EMAIL PROTECTED] and someone sends an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note difference of UPPER CASE S and lower case s in the two different e-mail addresses), the server will not authenticate the user in the database and will reject the message as non-deliverable. That same issue applies to sending messages when authentication is required. If a person's e-mail address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] and their account is setup as [EMAIL PROTECTED], then they will not be able to authenticate to SEND mail either. These issues are unresolved with both MAC and WINDOWS clients. According to Ipswitch tech support, they are supposed to have this issue resolved by mid-morning today. In the interim, if they are only affecting a few users, just have them use the web interface to send messages as that is working without a problem - at least on Windows 2000 Server. Are there other issues? Yes. Are they causing problems? Yes. Should this have been resolved prior to releasing the software? Yes, but the world is not perfect and neither is software development and I'm pretty certain that most of us have placed ourselves in a similar situation at least one time in the past. In this case, as it was explained to me, Ipswitch had this version of the software in use on several beta testing domains and neither this problem nor the other problems that have presented themselves were noted during the beta test phase. I have been critical of Ipswitch in many previous posts. However, in this case, I was able to speak with a knowledgeable tech support person, Kevin (give some credit where credit is due), and he was upfront and honest with me about the situation. Given what appear to be some pretty substantial improvements, overall, in both the anti-spamming capabilities (thanks for the SPF guys!) and the fact that we appear to have already cut down the amount of spam we were receiving by more than 80%, this is a pretty significant upgrade and I am willing to give Ipswitch the benefit of the doubt and let them get the patch ready to be deployed as quickly as they are capable. Please feel free to flame me if you disagree with me. Bruce Barnes ChicagoNetTech Inc -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dan Horne Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 08:16 To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Imail 8.2 and Mac clients FYI, we are in the process of restoring our Imail installation to its 8.15 state. We have found that none of our clients using Macs are able to authenticate at all. Every one is being auth'ed as [EMAIL PROTECTED], which is our OHN. The one client that is being authed correctly as [EMAIL PROTECTED] is on an IP'ed host, and his auth is also failing. I have sent a message to Ipswitch support, but we can't wait and have to restore to get our clients back up and running. Dan Horne To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe:
[IMail Forum] exchange2aliases
Sandy, Thanks for your patience on this I have been slowly approaching using your script when I get the time... You mentioned recently that for the exchnage2aliases script to work I need to be logged into exchange (or the network) as a valid user. Now this is likely a dumb question, but I'll ask anyway... If the exchange server I want to act as a gateway for is on a remote system somewhere, I guess I would need to have some kind of script run on my Imail server to connect and logon to that remote exchange system - how is this generally done? -Jim To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] Diffeerent Unable to SEND problem...
Title: Dictionary Attacks I have had three separate users on three separate virtual domains having trouble sending mail. They all use Macs and are all getting "Error 5500 The server did not understand the request" - resetting their password seems to solve the issue. Never had this problem before 8.2, may or may not be related. Anyone else seeing this?
RE: [IMail Forum] Diffeerent Unable to SEND problem...
Title: Dictionary Attacks Update on this... resetting password did not fix the problem. Two users using Mac OS9 and Entourage 2001 the other user using mac with outlook express... All accounts can be accesses via web-mail, so it must be a mail client issue. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim ComerfordSent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 10:15 AMTo: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] Diffeerent Unable to SEND problem... I have had three separate users on three separate virtual domains having trouble sending mail. They all use Macs and are all getting "Error 5500 The server did not understand the request" - resetting their password seems to solve the issue. Never had this problem before 8.2, may or may not be related. Anyone else seeing this?
RE: [IMail Forum] Diffeerent Unable to SEND problem...
In my case they are virtual hosts, and the MAC client requires user%domain.com as the username for authentication, my suspicion is the the new SMTP engine does not like the % and appends the main hostname after the username... Ipswitch, Any way around this or is there another character we can use in old mac clients instead of @ or %? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of CyberSharks.Net Support Team Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 12:07 PM To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Diffeerent Unable to SEND problem... Is his domain setup as a virtual host or a standard host? If it is virtual his email client UN should be his full email address… Justin Dixon, CCNA CyberSharks.Net, Inc. http://www.cybersharks.net   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Horne Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 11:36 AM To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Diffeerent Unable to SEND problem... I just had a user, also on a mac, contact me with errors sending. Here is his log lines from a failed send:  SMTPD (f90f01991884) [172.20.5.2] connect 66.26.141.24 port 49420 SMTPD (f90f01991884) [66.26.141.24] EHLO [192.168.1.101] SMTPD (f90f01991884) [66.26.141.24] AUTH SMTPD (f90f01991884) [66.26.141.24] AUTH SMTPD (f90f01991884) FAILED authentication [EMAIL PROTECTED] SMTPD (f90f01991884) [66.26.141.24] RSET SMTPD (f90f01991884) [66.26.141.24] MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SMTPD (f90f01991884) [66.26.141.24] RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SMTPD (f90f01991884) [x] looking up earthlink.net in HOSTS SMTPD (f90f01991884) [66.26.141.24] ERR mail.taisweb.net invalid user [EMAIL PROTECTED] SMTPD (f90f01991884) [66.26.141.24] QUIT  His account is [EMAIL PROTECTED], but it is trying to auth him as [EMAIL PROTECTED], which is my OHN.  I am trying to contact him now to check out his settings, but he's been working fine up until now, so I assume (I know) that he is still set up the same as he ever was.  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Comerford Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 10:39 AM To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Diffeerent Unable to SEND problem... Update on this... resetting password did not fix the problem. Two users using Mac OS9 and Entourage 2001 the other user using mac with outlook express... All accounts can be accesses via web-mail, so it must be a mail client issue. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Comerford Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 10:15 AM To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Diffeerent Unable to SEND problem... I have had three separate users on three separate virtual domains having trouble sending mail.  They all use Macs and are all getting Error 5500 The server did not understand the request - resetting their password seems to solve the issue.  Never had this problem before 8.2, may or may not be related. Anyone else seeing this?  To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] phrase filtering problems!
Look in your antispam settings: Content Filtering Tab Phrase filtering section is "Normalize Words" checked - That's what Travis is asking you also look at your other settings is SCANset to "Subject" or "Body" or both? also look at "action to be taken"... what's that set as? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ajaySent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 4:02 PMTo: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] phrase filtering problems! Hi, The log reads the following 20050428 143525 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (0F9A001E) [12.96.164.83] connect 65.54.161.42 port 13716 20050428 143525 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (0F9A001E) [65.54.161.42] EHLO hotmail.com 20050428 143525 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (0F9A001E) [65.54.161.42] MAIL FROM:MY HOTMAIL ACCOUNT WITH PHRASES I NEED TO BLOCK 20050428 143525 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (0F9A001E) [65.54.161.42] RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 20050428 143525 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (0F9A001E) [65.54.161.42] C:\IMail\spool\D3afd0f9a001e94a4.SMD 924 20050428 143525 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (0F9A001E) performing antispam checks 20050428 143529 127.0.0.1 SMTP () Info - Adding Queue file C:\IMail\spool\Q3afd0f9a001e94a4.SMD 20050428 143529 127.0.0.1 SMTP (0370259C) processing C:\IMail\spool\Q3afd0f9a001e94a4.SMD 20050428 143529 127.0.0.1 SMTP (0370259C) ldeliver optimalsol.com ajay.kulkarni-main (1) @hotmail.com 1490 20050428 143529 127.0.0.1 SMTP (0370259C) ldeliver optimalsol.com optimal.admin-main (1) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1490 20050428 143529 127.0.0.1 SMTP (0370259C) finished C:\IMail\spool\Q3afd0f9a001e94a4.SMD status=1 Still the X-SPAM header was not found in the mail. Am I sending the mail wrongly? I included the phrase in the subject line and not in the body (but that shouldnt matter rt?) Also I do not have any Whitelist setup to allow all mails without being tested for spam. I have a trial version of Declude 6 running. Can that interfere with the phrase list? ( Travis I still dont understand what normalizing the list means.I just downloaded the phrase list from the Ipswitch website added it to the phrase list and checked the Enable box) Regards,Ajay Kulkarni,_Optimal Solutions Integration, Inc.IT Administrator972-915-0123
RE: [IMail Forum] phrase filtering problems!
I dont know when some of these options came along, I'm on the latest version... there is a "Relay For Addresses" section... one of the options in there is "Skip antispam filters" if the sending IP address is in there and you have that checked -- that may be your problem. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ajaySent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 4:33 PMTo: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] phrase filtering problems! Jim, I use a older version. I dont have any option in the phrase filtering section saying Normalize words I also dont have the option to add a prefix(version 8.04). The action is set to INSET X-HEADER on finding a match Regards,Ajay Kulkarni,_Optimal Solutions Integration, Inc.IT Administrator972-915-0123
[IMail Forum] domain aliases
I think i may have found another little glitch in the new version... I have a domain called domaineoffices.com with a domain alias of domainoffices.com (note no"e" in middle on alias- this is a virtual domain). The user had been using the alias in the login name to both auth and login for mail. It worked fine until I upgraded. I see auth errors in the log where is say auth failed for "user@domain[EMAIL PROTECTED] where the @mail.sbsnet.com was appended by Imail. anyone else see anything like this?
RE: [IMail Forum] So Since Imail 8.20 is out..
I loaded it also, so far so good. Recently there was chatter that 8.2 would allow smtp to listen on port 25 and alternate ports like 587... anyone see where to config that? Also interested in configuring the dictionary attack protection that was mentioned would be included in 8.2. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan HorneSent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 4:40 PMTo: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] So Since Imail 8.20 is out.. Having a current SA for Imail Professional, I dl'ed and upgraded to 8.2 and everything seems to be going smooth so far. I am tailing the mail log now and it is still working, at least. Declude is still working with it. I went into Imail Admin and took a look around. There's a min and max threads in the SMTP advanced properties now, testament to the newmultithreaded SMTP engine. There are new tabs in the IP-ful hosts for White Lists and Attachment Blocking. New AntiSpam tabs include SPF, and Broken MIME Headers. Naturally, I went in and disabled all of it, since IMgate and Declude are pretty handy at that sort of thing grin. Nothing that I saw was changed ifrom my original configuration. Nothing that was disabled got magically re-enabled. New features were enabled by default, except SPF and Attachment Blocking (was enabled, but all items were de-selected by default).The thing I was interested in was the Dictionary attack feature that breaks a connection after so many ERRs in a single connection. I guess that isn't configurable, because there's no place in the GUI to set it. Not that I need it, but it is really the thing that Imail needs most IMO, a defense against the dictionary attacks that forced me and many others to put up an IMgate box or use BlackIce or some other method of mitigating the extreme loads that Imail was experiencing when it was dealing with the dictionary attacks on its own. Dan Horne From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris MoodySent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 4:10 PMTo: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] So Since Imail 8.20 is out.. Not I...rebuilding my Imail server does not sound like fun right now. I'll wait for the other guinea pigs...errr people to try it first. - Original Message - From: Eric Parsons To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 3:33 PM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] So Since Imail 8.20 is out.. I am waiting for someone also, Ran the executable and looks like it creates a new directory structure. Cancelled the install. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis RabeSent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 2:31 PMTo: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] So Since Imail 8.20 is out.. Who will install it firstany takers?
RE: [IMail Forum] Short survery
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 8:21 AM To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Short survery We are researching ideas for future version of IMail and would like some feedback on web servers. 1) Do you currently Run IIS or Apache? If so, which one? IIS 2) If IMail required a web server, which would you prefer: a proprietary web server shipped with IMail, IIS or Apache? IIS 3) Would it be a problem if IMail required IIS? NO 4) Would it be a problem if IMail required the .Net framework? NO 5) Would it be a problem if IMail required PHP? YES Thanks in advance for your input, Tripp Allen Software Development Manager, Messaging Ipswitch, Inc. To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] Exchange2Aliases...
I am getting stuck on the syntax of the exchange2aliases script. I have been trying to call: Cscript exchange2aliases.vbs cteatest.com ldap://67.93.212.66/cn=users,dc=server-04,dc=ctea.local ctea.local cteainc.com I've also tried variations with always a syntax error on char 41,1 (the Ldap part) Basically the exchange server I want to connect to is at ip: 67.93.212.66 The exchange domain is configured as ctea.local. I have setup a temporary virtual domain in Imail called Cteatest.com (it will be cteainc.com) The server is named server-04. I do have mail passing thru imail server now (via hosts file) for cteainc.com, but I want to test it first with another temporary virtual domain. Can anyone point me in right direction? To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] exchange2aliases
Its time I setup exchange2aliases for two systems for which we are using Imail as a gateway for exchange. I'm a little confused, so any guidance would be appreciated. Right now the MX for one of these domains points to mail.example1.com where an A Record points mail.example1.com to our Imail box. An entry in the Hosts file on that server points mail.example1.com to the IP of the Exchange box (NTSBS). There is no host for this domain configured in Imail. First off If I implement Exchange2Aliases does this setup remain or need to change? Second, I'm not too sure on the syntax for calling exchange2aliases...I see the example: Cscript exchange2aliases.vbs mail.broadleaf.local LDAP://192.168.1.1/cn=users,dc=broadleaf,dc=local broadleaf.local exchange.broadleaf.local And am a little confused on the syntax of all this and what names go where Assume: domain = example1.com MX of example1.com points to Mail.example1.com Mail.example1.com points to 1.2.3.4 (IMAIL BOX) Imail box Host File entry mail.example1.com points to 4.5.6.7 (MSSBS Exchange Box) (currently no dns entry for this server) MSSBS Domain = example2.local servername = server-04 Thanks In Advance. To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Matching Reverse and Forward Lookup Failed
Title: Message see: http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ptr.ch?ip=209.48.99.242 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Elliott BujanSent: Friday, April 08, 2005 4:32 PMTo: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] Matching Reverse and Forward Lookup Failed What does this mean? This is the second user with this error in the past week (that has complained) RCPT TO generated following response: 554 Client host rejected: Matching Reverse and Forward Lookup Failed - Contact YOUR Internet Service Provider and request a matching reverse and forward DNS record, [209.48.99.242] Thank you,Elliott===Elliott BujanInitial Tropical Plants - USA(847) 634 4250 ext. 99281[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [IMail Forum] QUEUEMGR Issue
We have had some queue manager issues, and For what is worth, we utilize a script which automatically runs ipswitch's antispamseeder and then restarts queuemgr with: net stop queuemgr net start queuemgr And we can trace most of our Quemanager hangups to one of these events running where the queue manager never restarts properly. When it happens we need to reboot the server, because when we try to kill the process we get an error. We don't have any ERR 005 when that happens. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of E. Shanbrom (Ipswitch) Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 8:59 AM To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] QUEUEMGR Issue I would look through the log for any ERR 005's for a start. If you have them there will be a step number that you need to get to support along with the files (Q D) that caused it. QM reports to the SMTP log independently of the SMTPD but since it _is_ part of the SMTP delivery process it logs to the same place as the listener so you have it all in one place. Eric S - Original Message - From: Duane Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 7:59 AM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] QUEUEMGR Issue As stated from below I'm using v8.15hf1. Can you shed some light as to what I should be looking for? Usually when this happens, I don't catch it for a few hours. There's alot of logging information to go through. It would help if I could at least have something to narrow down to when it started. Correct me if I may be misunderstanding. If the SMTP and queue manager operate separately from each other, why would there be errors with SMTP? Is the queue manager part of the SMTP service? The server keeps accepting messages, however, with the queue manager stuck in a stopping state, the messages are not getting moved through the queue. Our other IMail server we have set up (same version and hotfix) has never had this issue. Then again, it doesn't see the traffic that the problem server sees. On Friday, April 1, 2005 at 3:13:16 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated: Are there errors in the SMTP log? What version of IMail? Have you been in touch with support about this? We can usually do a better job with direct contact SNIP - Original Message - From: Duane Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 10:55 AM Subject: [IMail Forum] QUEUEMGR Issue IMail v8.15hf1 I have an issue with the QUEUEMGR attempting to stop every once in a while. In the services screen within IMail Administrator it shows that the service is stopping but it never does. Messages therefore are piling up in the spool directory. I can highlite the service and click start/stop but nothing happens. I usually at this point have to reboot the server. Anyone else seen or know what can be done? - Duane Hill Sr E-Mail Administrator http://www.yournetplus.com To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] Shared Calendar...?
We currently use Imail to host over 100 domains and a couple of thousand email addresses. A client is inquiring about the feasibility of a shared calendar. I know ICS offers this functionality now, but is also bloated with other "features" I don't want.I am exploring my options. 1. Can my Imail work as-is for existing customers and I just buy ICS for say 50 users for this particular client -- or would this not work, and I'd need a completely different server to run this ICS version of Imail on. 2. Do any of you utilize any other 3rd part solutions, which would allow a shared calendar and if so, how well do they work. 3. Are there any other products/factors I should consider that I have not mentioned Thanks, Jim
[IMail Forum] Win2003 DNS...
I'm upgrading some servers to Windows 2003 from NT4. I seem to recall a discussion or two about windows 2003 DNS settings on this list but cannot find them in the archives. Specifically there were some settings suggested on Windows 2003 DNS which made Imail run optimally with it. Does anyone happen to recall what that settting was -- or can you point me to the archived discussion. Thanks, Jim To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] SPAM List Problem
We too were using this as one of many blacklists... we too experienced problems over the weekend and dropped it from our tests we luckily did not have it as a "trusted" list. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony NormanSent: Monday, January 24, 2005 11:58 AMTo: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] SPAM List Problem Hello all...my issuestarted Friday PM, so if there was something I have missed in this forum (I just subscribed), please forgive me... Starting at 3:30 (MST) or so Friday afternoon, every email received by my 8.05 IMail server was being caught on this blacklist: "message failed check v6net which was marked as trusted, deleting" This was spammers.v6net.org, which is the 'Arbitrary Black List', which is supposed to be at http://abl.v6net.org. When I go there, however, I get some junk ads. I have turned this off from my blacklist check, and now all mail is getting through. I am curious if anyone else experienced this, or had some thoughts. Thanks, TN
RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] Fitlering/Antispam
Sandy, Can you point me to some documentation of exchange2aliases? I've downloaded it but am not having much luck with it. I'm not sure if my syntax is messed up, I have access issues, or both. -Jim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 6:24 PM To: Darin Cox Subject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] Fitlering/Antispam It's a good idea to set up email aliases for all of the customer's addresses to minimize the impact of dictionary attacks. . . . i.e. with one of my ldap2aliases/exchange2aliases/notes2aliases scripts, if you can get LDAP access to the remote userbase. --Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SpamAssassin plugs into Declude! http://www.mailmage.com/products/software/freeutils/SPAMC32/download/release / Defuse Dictionary Attacks: Turn Exchange or IMail mailboxes into IMail Aliases! http://www.mailmage.com/products/software/freeutils/exchange2aliases/downloa d/release/ http://www.mailmage.com/products/software/freeutils/ldap2aliases/download/re lease/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] OT: Mail Config Issue
This is slightly off-topic, but this is the best list I know for mail issues. We host a web site and mail for this client They want to start using an internal Exchange Server and pass most of the mail via Exchange Pop3 connector. They have a few external users who for some reason MUST continue using pop3 This works fine on incoming mail. If Exchange user however sends mail to an POP3 user on the same domain the problem begins. I'm not an Exchange person, so these answers may be simple, but I was unable to find my answers...I have these questions: Is there a way in exchange to tell it that certain users of that domain are not internal and they need to be sent back to our server? Or if Exchange Server allows some users to connect via POP3 and get their mail, I could route all of their mail to Exchange and let those few users access it via POP3 from Exchange? Thanks for any direction here... -Jim To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Imail Error: Delivery Failure - Orphaned files in spool directory
Eric, I was running 8.14 at the time (since added 8.14hf1) What would I look for in the logs to help me identify the files I should send to support... -Jim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Shanbrom [Ipswitch] Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 5:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Imail Error: Delivery Failure - Orphaned files in spool directory What version of IMail are you running? These are messages the queue manager is having trouble with. We need those files and the log sent to support so we can see why it's blown up...If you are not running v 8.14then you need to upgrade before trying to send those in tho... Eric S - Original Message - From: Ted Galerneau [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 5:33 PM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Imail Error: Delivery Failure - Orphaned files in spool directory There are 2 SMD file for every message, if one is deleted somehow and the other one remains, you will get that error. There may also be other reasons this will happen. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Comerford Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 1:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [IMail Forum] Imail Error: Delivery Failure - Orphaned files in spool directory I've been running Imail for several years and have never seen this message before: It was addressed to postmaster Subject: Delivery Failure - Orphaned files in spool directory Message: -- -- -- IMail detected a fatal error while attempting delivery. The messages causing this error have been orphaned in the IMail spool directory. Please contact Ipswitch Technical Support. -- -- -- I checked and all services are working fine... Nothing obvious in log file. Should I be concerned about this, what caused it and/or what would I look for in logs to explain it. To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] Imail Error: Delivery Failure - Orphaned files in spool directory
I've been running Imail for several years and have never seen this message before: It was addressed to postmaster Subject: Delivery Failure - Orphaned files in spool directory Message: -- IMail detected a fatal error while attempting delivery. The messages causing this error have been orphaned in the IMail spool directory. Please contact Ipswitch Technical Support. -- I checked and all services are working fine... Nothing obvious in log file. Should I be concerned about this, what caused it and/or what would I look for in logs to explain it. To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Cross-grade concerns addressed (NEW SVC AGREEMENT PRICES)
Title: Getting facts on this straight before speaking to boss Jill, I hope you would not take personally any flames, as I'm sure the forum does not mean to"shoot the messenger"... I for one appreciate any Ipswich staff involvement in this forum. You pose two questions: one is to offer another 1000 user level of product... We are a small ISP falling between the 250 user limit and the 1000 user number, so yes this may have some appeal to us, but I think the forced bundling of features is more of a problem... we don't need nor want some of these additional features... Even your lower number of user cost is excessive If you want to force a bundle, add declude and make us purchase that... that way I can convince the boss to buy it... but the AV you offer is overpriced and the other features we don't need. Your other question relates to continued offer of a service agreement for Imail (standalone)... your current $495 price is reasonable and periodic reasonableincrease infees would be accepted... It may be best to follow the course of offering upgrade only pricing (at or below current $495and upgrade and support options (perhaps $495-$995)... or offer pay-as-you go support at $(95-$250) per incident all of this assumes you will continue to update the product. This forum provides superior support for imail anyway and any support issue not handles here probably is a result of someone in need of hand-holding or a bug in the product...a by product of the forum is the occasional healthy and humorous spat between participants. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jill JonesSent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 2:19 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Cross-grade concerns addressed (NEW SVC AGREEMENT PRICES) Hi Bryan, The service agreement prices include the AV subscription renewals as well as service on the components in the ICS bundle (which in the case of the ISP/EDU bundle is IMail, KWM and AV). There is one typo in the list concerning the renewal of the ICS ISP Edition that number should read $3,995 instead of $4,995. What I would be curious to know is 1) Since that $3,995 number includes subscription for unlimited Symantec AV, would it be more palatable to have two tiers for the ISP bundles perhaps a 1,000 user level and an unlimited level? This would substantially drop the cost of the renewal (I cant give numbers, as I dont have them since at the moment this is hypothetical). 2) If we were to continue to offer a stand-alone Service Agreement for IMail, what would be a fair price for such an agreement? Please bear in mind that the current $495 does not cover our Support costs, let alone our Development costs. I am asking this forum these questions, not to start another flame, but to get some feedback I would appreciate everyones use of correct forum etiquette. It is difficult for me to post here in good faith while getting personally flamed. Thanks, Jill From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bryan E. MartinSent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 5:39 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Cross-grade concerns addressed (NEW SVC AGREEMENT PRICES) Jill, I received a PowerPoint presentation from Renee Breckenridge, my new account manager, which also gave the ICS Annual Renewal fees (new service agreement fees). They were as follows: STANDARD EDITION: 25 Users $375 100 Users $995 250 Users $1495 Unlimited Users $2995 PREMIUM EDITION: 25 Users $449 100 Users $1295 250 Users $2695 Unlimited Users $4995 ISP/EDU EDITION: Unlimited Users $4995 Should I decide to actually purchase ICS Standard Unlimited just to keep running IMail Server and receiving support and upgrades to a product I have invested three years of my time and profit in, my annual renewal fee will increase from $495 to a minimum of $2995, over 600%. But just to get there, I have to also jump the $4995 hurdle, which is over a 1000% increase in the first year. All I have ever used is IMail Server. Thats all I want, thats all I need, but Ipswitch is no longer going to provide me with that option. Jill, would Ipswitch rather have $0 from my company than $495? Is that truly the better deal financially for the company? Please respond to this e-mail. You have been very active in the form today. I would appreciate a straightforward response to my inquiry. Thanks, Bryan E. Martin Ziggycom Online, Inc. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jill JonesSent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 3:22 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [IMail Forum] Cross-grade concerns addressed Hi Doug, I hope that this post will address many of the concerns I have read on the forum yesterday and today in regards to crossgrading from IMail to ICS. If you have a current Service Agreement for IMail or IIM, and are not interested in crossgrading to ICS, you will receive service
RE: [IMail Forum] Collaboration is now available :(
I just realized our service agreement has expired a few days ago and was about to renew... This will change things... Looking for a new solution now. To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] OT- Recommended Registrars
Title: OT- Recommended Registrars alldomains.com ... very happy with them
RE: [IMail Forum] Weird Issue with SMTP32-FWD
See if there is a rules.ima file which may have a rule doing this... That would likely remain after removing the virtual domain and re-adding it, thus the continued problem -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Geiser Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 10:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [IMail Forum] Weird Issue with SMTP32-FWD Hello, All, I am having a very weird issue with one of my e-mail hosting customers and I was hoping that someone could provide some guidance. We have a customer, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Whenever Gretchen sends an e-mail to anybody, whether it is an Internet recipient or someone on our IMail server, the same e-mail address, [EMAIL PROTECTED], always gets a copy of the message. Yesterday I had her send a test to my e-mail address, [EMAIL PROTECTED], and I watched the IMail inbox, main.mbx, for [EMAIL PROTECTED] very closely and sure enough at the same instant I receive Gretchen's test message one showed up in the [EMAIL PROTECTED] inbox. I looked over everything in IMail and on their Outlook clients and couldn't find any settings which would be causing this to happen. To eliminate IMail as a source of the problem I decided to delete their whole IMail host and recreate the users from scratch. I did that and we tested again and again [EMAIL PROTECTED] received a copy of the message. Here are the headers from the made after we deleted and re-added everything back... Test Message Sent to Me: == Received: from omg3 [245.106.230.134] by xyz.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.06) id A8D7FA5100DC; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:12:55 -0400 From: Gretchen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: test 6 Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:12:55 -0400 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_NextPart_000_00B7_01C4B07E.B7A8FE10 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [245.106.230.134] X-Note: This E-mail was scanned filtered by Declude [1.79] for SPAM viruses. X-Country-Chain: UNITED STATES-destination X-Note: Recipient(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Note: Sent with HELO [omg3] from Reverse DNS [[No Reverse DNS]] X-Spam-Tests-Failed: IPNOTINMX, NOLEGITCONTENT, REVDNS [25] X-RCPT-TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-UIDL: 60777 Status: U This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_00B7_01C4B07E.B7A8FE10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Test6 Gretchen == Test Also Received by [EMAIL PROTECTED]: == From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 12 17:13:05 2004 Received: from SMTP32-FWD by pagerover.com (SMTP32) id A1154; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:13:04 -0400 Received: from omg3 [245.106.230.134] by xyz.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.06) id A8D7FA5100DC; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:12:55 -0400 From: Gretchen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: test 6 Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:12:55 -0400 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_NextPart_000_00B7_01C4B07E.B7A8FE10 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [245.106.230.134] X-Note: This E-mail was scanned filtered by Declude [1.79] for SPAM viruses. X-Country-Chain: UNITED STATES-destination X-Note: Recipient(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Note: Sent with HELO [omg3] from Reverse DNS [[No Reverse DNS]] X-Spam-Tests-Failed: IPNOTINMX, NOLEGITCONTENT, REVDNS [25] X-UIDL: 397615190 Status: U This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_00B7_01C4B07E.B7A8FE10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Test6 Gretchen == This first thing I noticed when comparing these two headers was the additional line in the one which ended up in [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s in-box... == Received: from SMTP32-FWD by pagerover.com (SMTP32) id A1154; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:13:04 -0400 == Pagerover.com is another domain name on our IMail server but I can't figure out why SMTP32-FWD is kicking in. Is there some place in the file system or registry where I can go to see why SMTP32-FWD is forwarding this message? Thanks So Much! Dan Geiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Sign up for virus-free and spam-free e-mail with Nexus Technology Group http://www.nexustechgroup.com/mailscan To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ:
RE: [IMail Forum] Unable to delete messages in Web Msg. following mass deletion
We ran into something similar when a corrupt message was in the mailbox. Deleting caused many messages in same mailbox to be deleted and some could not be deleted. If you search archives for corrupt mailbox I think you will find some steps we used to fix the mailbox (as much as possible) it involves renaming the mailbox and dragging some messages into it before recreating the indexes. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of imail Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 11:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [IMail Forum] Unable to delete messages in Web Msg. following mass deletion All of a sudden, over a dozen of our web messaging (webmail) users began reporting the exact same problem. In every case, the scenario goes like this: The user attempted to delete one or more individual messages using the checkboxes in webmail. But in addition to deleting those messages, dozens or even hundreds of other messages got deleted that they did NOT have selected. And from that exact moment on, they are unable to delete ANY messages from web messaging (it says deleting but then message is still there). In almost every case, these are users who have been using web messaging daily with no problems for years. While I have not been able to reproduce the mass-deletion incident on any account I've tried, I CAN reproduce the inability to delete messages on all accounts where this problem has already been reported. There are at least a hundred other users who are NOT experiencing these problems. And the problem can be present on one account while another account on the same domain is working fine. In my testing, I found that I was able to delete messages in subfolders, but not in the inbox. I also found that when accessing one of these problem accounts from Outlook, Outlook was able to fetch messages from the inbox, but it was NOT able to remotely delete the message on the server, as it normally would after a send-and-receive. The only possibly relevent article I found in IPSwitch's knowledgebase suggested a 'locked' mailbox. But restarting all Imail services, as the article recommended, has not fixed the problem. The list of people reporting this problem seems to be growing. Has anyone run into this problem in the past, or have any ideas? Thanks! Keith W. Schoenly To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] Slightly OT: Imail and netmasks...
If I wanted to allow Relay For Addresses and wanted to include all Ips in our class C EXCEPT 1, how would I do this. a.b.c.20 would be the one I would want to EXCLUDE I think that using a.b.c.0/28 (netmask 255.255.255.240) would get me the 1-15, but I really don't know how this works for the other blocks afterwards. I'm looking to make the least number of entries in my relay for addresses list Thanks. To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] Supporting Users with port 25 blocked...
We have an increasing number of users who use various ISP's who are blocking port 25 traffic (ie earthlink, optonline, etc) Our mail servers require SMTP AUTH. I searched thru the archives and see discussions on port 587 and on redirection at the router as a way to allow user of port 25 blocked networks send mail thru our server. If the user already uses AUTH, can I just instruct a user to change the outgoing port from 25 to 587 in his mail client - this would seem to be a simple solution (almost too simple) am I missing something here? If I need to resort to port redirection in a router, what implications does this have on smtp auth or other things. To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] Mail-To-Fax
Just purchased and downloaded Mail-To-Fax add-on for Imail. Using Imail 8.12 on NT4 server. When I run Mail-To-Fax application all I get is a small window ERROR with no further message and a yellow ! icon and an OK button... I see a very old post in the archives on this issue, but it looks like back in the 7.x versions...it involved a patch which must be requested. I'm awaiting support from IPSwitch, but I thought I run by the list while I wait. Any Ideas? To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] Limiting recipients...
I know one of the smtp options lets us limit the maximum number of recipients on an outgoing mail... Does anyone know if there is a way to impose that limit for only one domain or one user without imposing it on everyone using the server? ...Or is there a way to accomplish something similar with outbound rules? To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] Service Agreement Discounts...?
My service agreement expires soon... Ipswitch Price: $495 Prof edition In searching archives I see some discounting: http://www.provantage.com/scripts/cart.dll/x/0/continue/IPSW23J $316.49 http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/default.aspx?EDC=494317 $338.64 Has anyone done better, and if so can you share your source... Thanks, Jim C To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] Mail getting rejected to One user...
Having problems sending to a particular domain from any users on our Imail server... The applicable logs and returned mail headers are below: Any Idea what the problem is? Sending to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sending from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or any users of virtual domains on this server Returned Mail headers -- Unknown user: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPT TO generated following response: 571 - MAIL REFUSED - Reverse DNS failed - IP address mismatch. Original message follows. Received: from jimc [63.147.233.2] by sbsnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.12) id AB49215B0130; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 10:46:33 -0400 From: Jim Comerford [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Testing for megawood... Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 10:46:07 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2149 Thread-Index: AcRjZ/f/pCQqDj/4TpyxLdtB16aoIA== Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Logs -- 20040706 104629 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (bb45215b01302ff3) [63.147.233.20] connect 63.147.233.2 port 1596 20040706 104629 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (bb45215b01302ff3) [63.147.233.2] EHLO jimc 20040706 104629 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (bb45215b01302ff3) Authenticated [EMAIL PROTECTED], session treated as local. 20040706 104629 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (bb45215b01302ff3) [63.147.233.2] MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20040706 104629 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (bb45215b01302ff3) [63.147.233.2] RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20040706 104633 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (bb45215b01302ff3) [63.147.233.2] MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20040706 104633 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (bb45215b01302ff3) [63.147.233.2] RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20040706 104633 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (bb45215b01302ff3) [63.147.233.2] C:\IMail\spool\Dbb45215b01302ff3.SMD 920 20040706 104633 127.0.0.1 SMTP (bb45215b01302ff3) processing C:\IMail\spool\Qbb45215b01302ff3.SMD 20040706 104634 127.0.0.1 SMTP (bb45215b01302ff3) Trying weichertrealtors.net (0) 20040706 104634 127.0.0.1 SMTP (bb45215b01302ff3) Connect weichertrealtors.net [65.246.198.131:25] (1) 20040706 104638 127.0.0.1 SMTP (bb45215b01302ff3) 220 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Service ready 20040706 104638 127.0.0.1 SMTP (bb45215b01302ff3) EHLO sbsnet.com 20040706 104638 127.0.0.1 SMTP (bb45215b01302ff3) 500 Syntax error, command unrecognized 20040706 104638 127.0.0.1 SMTP (bb45215b01302ff3) HELO sbsnet.com 20040706 104638 127.0.0.1 SMTP (bb45215b01302ff3) 250 Requested mail action okay, completed 20040706 104638 127.0.0.1 SMTP (bb45215b01302ff3) MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 20040706 104639 127.0.0.1 SMTP (bb45215b01302ff3) 250 Requested mail action okay, completed 20040706 104639 127.0.0.1 SMTP (bb45215b01302ff3) RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 20040706 104639 127.0.0.1 SMTP (bb45215b01302ff3) 571 - MAIL REFUSED - Reverse DNS failed - IP address mismatch. 20040706 104639 127.0.0.1 SMTP (bb45215b01302ff3) QUIT 20040706 104639 127.0.0.1 SMTP (bb45215b01302ff3) 20040706 104639 127.0.0.1 SMTP (bb45215b01302ff3) Creating message from Postmaster 20040706 104639 127.0.0.1 SMTP (bb45215b01302ff3) finished C:\IMail\spool\Qbb45215b01302ff3.SMD status=2 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Mail getting rejected to One user...
But the mailserver does have a correct reverse dns entry: http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ptr.ch?ip=63.147.233.20 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Foresman Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 11:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Mail getting rejected to One user... Your mail seems to be refused because you don't have a correct reverse dns entry. Hence: 571 - MAIL REFUSED - Reverse DNS failed - IP address mismatch. Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Comerford Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 11:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [IMail Forum] Mail getting rejected to One user... Having problems sending to a particular domain from any users on our Imail server... The applicable logs and returned mail headers are below: Any Idea what the problem is? Sending to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sending from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or any users of virtual domains on this server Returned Mail headers -- Unknown user: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPT TO generated following response: 571 - MAIL REFUSED - Reverse DNS failed - IP address mismatch. Original message follows. Received: from jimc [63.147.233.2] by sbsnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.12) id AB49215B0130; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 10:46:33 -0400 From: Jim Comerford [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Testing for megawood... Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 10:46:07 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2149 Thread-Index: AcRjZ/f/pCQqDj/4TpyxLdtB16aoIA== Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Logs -- 20040706 104629 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (bb45215b01302ff3) [63.147.233.20] connect 63.147.233.2 port 1596 20040706 104629 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (bb45215b01302ff3) [63.147.233.2] EHLO jimc 20040706 104629 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (bb45215b01302ff3) Authenticated [EMAIL PROTECTED], session treated as local. 20040706 104629 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (bb45215b01302ff3) [63.147.233.2] MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20040706 104629 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (bb45215b01302ff3) [63.147.233.2] RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20040706 104633 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (bb45215b01302ff3) [63.147.233.2] MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20040706 104633 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (bb45215b01302ff3) [63.147.233.2] RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20040706 104633 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (bb45215b01302ff3) [63.147.233.2] C:\IMail\spool\Dbb45215b01302ff3.SMD 920 20040706 104633 127.0.0.1 SMTP (bb45215b01302ff3) processing C:\IMail\spool\Qbb45215b01302ff3.SMD 20040706 104634 127.0.0.1 SMTP (bb45215b01302ff3) Trying weichertrealtors.net (0) 20040706 104634 127.0.0.1 SMTP (bb45215b01302ff3) Connect weichertrealtors.net [65.246.198.131:25] (1) 20040706 104638 127.0.0.1 SMTP (bb45215b01302ff3) 220 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Service ready 20040706 104638 127.0.0.1 SMTP (bb45215b01302ff3) EHLO sbsnet.com 20040706 104638 127.0.0.1 SMTP (bb45215b01302ff3) 500 Syntax error, command unrecognized 20040706 104638 127.0.0.1 SMTP (bb45215b01302ff3) HELO sbsnet.com 20040706 104638 127.0.0.1 SMTP (bb45215b01302ff3) 250 Requested mail action okay, completed 20040706 104638 127.0.0.1 SMTP (bb45215b01302ff3) MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 20040706 104639 127.0.0.1 SMTP (bb45215b01302ff3) 250 Requested mail action okay, completed 20040706 104639 127.0.0.1 SMTP (bb45215b01302ff3) RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 20040706 104639 127.0.0.1 SMTP (bb45215b01302ff3) 571 - MAIL REFUSED - Reverse DNS failed - IP address mismatch. 20040706 104639 127.0.0.1 SMTP (bb45215b01302ff3) QUIT 20040706 104639 127.0.0.1 SMTP (bb45215b01302ff3) 20040706 104639 127.0.0.1 SMTP (bb45215b01302ff3) Creating message from Postmaster 20040706 104639 127.0.0.1 SMTP (bb45215b01302ff3) finished C:\IMail\spool\Qbb45215b01302ff3.SMD status=2 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Mail getting rejected to One user...
How does one go about changing the HELO? Does it automatically use the official hostname or can change that in Imail admin or the registry somewhere... I have done a quick search but dont seem to find this anywhere... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 11:18 AM To: Jim Comerford Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Mail getting rejected to One user... 571 - MAIL REFUSED - Reverse DNS failed - IP address mismatch. The implication of this error is that your outgoing IP, 63.147.233.20, fails the common loopback test that checks to see if there is a seamless IP-to-PTR-to-A-to-IP mapping. However, 63.147.233.20 indeed loops back correctly to mail.sbsnet.com and back to 63.147.233.20, meaning that the remote end is having DNS issues (or is misreporting the reason for the rejection). Note that your are HELOing as sbsnet.com, which is NOT in fact the canonical name for the mail server (its A record points to another IP): this is not a good practice, and also possible grounds for rejection. --Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SpamAssassin plugs into Declude! http://www.mailmage.com/products/software/freeutils/SPAMC32/download/release / Defuse Dictionary Attacks: Turn Exchange Addresses into IMail Aliases! http://www.mailmage.com/products/software/freeutils/exchange2aliases/downloa d/release/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Mail getting rejected to One user...
Thanks for all who answered. Changing the official hostname of the primary domain to match solved the problem... So apparently they required the HELO hostname to match exactly. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 1:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Mail getting rejected to One user... The message was very clear. Quit guessing. No, it was not clear. It did not include the IP address of the mailserver, so if any IP was used other than our best guess, we have to jump through hoops to figure out the problem. The IP that they use to send to the IMail mailserver has a perfect reverse DNS entry (all DNS servers have PTR records pointing to the same hostname, which has an A record that all the DNS servers agree points back to the same IP). So the ball is in the court of the people generating that poor error message. The PTR hostname either 1) was not found or 2) was found, but had no matching A record. Not so. Forget about HELO hostname or SMTP greeting hostname or virtual Imail domains when trying the fix this error, which could be a DNS failure on their end, not yours, as Sandy said. Len, I'll agree that the message was very misleading. But the problem is almost certainly the HELO. I've tried from two separate IPs that have perfect reverse DNS entries set up, and from one it worked, but not the other. The only difference I can see is that the HELO was the same for both, yet it was related to one IP but not the other. So I'm guessing they are doing an A record lookup of the HELO and seeing how close it is to the IP, or some other oddball (crazy anti-spam test) stuff. -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers since 2000. Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver vulnerability detection. Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] 8.12 custom rules
There was a syntax change in the rules in one of the latest upgrades... I think the "[" character suddenly had new meaning... if you change the rules to redirect to a mailbox you will be able to look at your headers to see what rule is catching all the mail and fix it. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rudy PierucciniSent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 1:06 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [IMail Forum] 8.12 custom rules Hi all. Just upgraded to 8.12 For some reason my customers with specific rules.ima are complaining that they cant receive any messages. When I delete or change the file to a default one of my own , things go back to normal. Anyone experiencing this problem with rules? Regards. Atenciosamente, --- Rudy Pieruccini Netpoint - Internet com Qualidade Fone: (11) 3663-0300 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netpoint.com.br ---
RE: [IMail Forum] Increasing number of spam
I continually have key users forward spam (and some non-spam) to the spamseeder program... If nothing else this has given us a fairly good url blacklist which identifies a large portion of the usual offenders... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura Bhandari Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 2:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Increasing number of spam I think if you rely on phrase filters and smtp control access (as I do), then you are seeing an increase. I open the some of the spam to try and find phrases I can filter out but those spammers are getting sneakier - the emails are short and to the point - and many don't use phrases we can safely filter. I downloaded the phraselist on IPSwitch's site and have since added many of my own phrases. It stops quite a bit and I get very, very few false positives... but we are pretty low volume compared to most of the list folks. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scott Smith Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 2:19 PM To: Imail Forum Subject: [IMail Forum] Increasing number of spam I know this might not be a very difficult problem to figure out, but I just want to see if I'm missing something obvious. My spam filters in Imail are increasingly missing more and more spam. Is this just something that could be resolved by updating my phrase list or blacklist? Because I haven't really been on top of things on our email server lately (being the lone IT guy between two branches is kind of a lot to handle sometimes). If this is probably the case, where can I download the most recent spam phrase list and URL blacklist? Scott Smith - IT Manager Westside Detroit Reprographics 248.489.1999 (Office) 248.467.0452 (Cell) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Increasing number of spam
Search for antispamseeder.exe - the docs are fairly good Basically you need for forward spam to a spam mailbox somewhere, and Ideally send non-spam to a not-spam mailbox. Then you can run the antispamseeder program (I schedule mine to run daily) to read those mailboxes. I also then automatically delete those mailboxes. You may want to be monitoring those mailboxes to insure just spam gets into them if you have some click-happy users submitting to them. You can also set up an exclude list for the blacklist urls so particular urls don't get in there by accident. This will also train the baesian filter for those users... But if you have a wide userbase or any using foreign languages that may not work well. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Smith Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 3:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Increasing number of spam How would I set up the server to allow me to forward messages to the spamseeder program? Forgive me if this is something explained in detail in the user's manual... And would someone please at least help me find the current spam lists (I can't seem to find them on Ipswitch's website). Scott Smith - IT Manager Westside Detroit Reprographics 248.489.1999 (Office) 248.467.0452 (Cell) [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Jim Comerford [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 3:07 PM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Increasing number of spam I continually have key users forward spam (and some non-spam) to the spamseeder program... If nothing else this has given us a fairly good url blacklist which identifies a large portion of the usual offenders... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura Bhandari Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 2:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Increasing number of spam I think if you rely on phrase filters and smtp control access (as I do), then you are seeing an increase. I open the some of the spam to try and find phrases I can filter out but those spammers are getting sneakier - the emails are short and to the point - and many don't use phrases we can safely filter. I downloaded the phraselist on IPSwitch's site and have since added many of my own phrases. It stops quite a bit and I get very, very few false positives... but we are pretty low volume compared to most of the list folks. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scott Smith Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 2:19 PM To: Imail Forum Subject: [IMail Forum] Increasing number of spam I know this might not be a very difficult problem to figure out, but I just want to see if I'm missing something obvious. My spam filters in Imail are increasingly missing more and more spam. Is this just something that could be resolved by updating my phrase list or blacklist? Because I haven't really been on top of things on our email server lately (being the lone IT guy between two branches is kind of a lot to handle sometimes). If this is probably the case, where can I download the most recent spam phrase list and URL blacklist? Scott Smith - IT Manager Westside Detroit Reprographics 248.489.1999 (Office) 248.467.0452 (Cell) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] VERY OT: 502 Connection Hangup
Excuse the OT post, but thought some of you may have some insight -- Some customers who use AOL are getting a 502 Connection Hangup error when accessing a website hosted by eHost ( thermalpackagingsolutions.com ) -- It seems this behavior is fairly consistent over the last week or so - but occasionally the website will display Using another connection/browser at the same time displayes the site just fine... If you have any ideas please e-mail me off-list Thanks, Jim Comerford Successful Business Solutions, Inc. PO Box 310 Gillette, NJ 07933 Phone: 908-322-5123 Fax: 908-322-6235 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sbsnet.com To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] Preventing Forwarding to AOL
Is there a way to prevent a user from forwarding mail to particular addresses? I'm trying to avoid getting blacklisted by AOL after a user forwards their junkmail there and then clicks AOL's spam button -- thus I'd like to prevent users from forwarding to AOL. Any thoughts on how to accomplish this... Something like preventing all forwarding unless entered by an admin or some type of rule which could check for forwarding, etc. I saw some discussion of the AOL problem in the archives, but no real solutions... To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Request to IPSwitch to please remove RMilner from the IMail
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RMilner Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 12:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Request to IPSwitch to please remove RMilner from the IMail Considering I even wrote a one line rule for you to delete all my messages, I'd love to see how you cry to spammers to take you off their email lists instead of doing what would take you 5 seconds in a cut and paste. I see you have not supplied any answers to anyone on this list this month - in fact it appears you have only posted 2 answers in the last 90 days. Great contributions! Ditto that on a search of messages from Joe Wolf and AndyB. If I or others that try to answer people who your click choose not to answer and get blown off the list, so be it. If everyone contributed as little as you, the list would be useless anyway. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Landry Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 10:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Request to IPSwitch to please remove RMilner from the IMail - Original Message - From: Keif Gwinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 6:34 AM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Request to IPSwitch to please remove RMilner from the IMail I also find return receipts annoying. More annoying than top posting and out of office auto replies ? Welch, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] with his auto reply is worse I believe. Can't you just disable your mail client from attempting to answer them ? Yes, but the posting rules have been clearly defined, so either follow them or enforce them. Bill To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Upgrading to 8.11
One issue mentioned, the 10MB limit, is a default in the web-mail templates which you need to set within the template config files... Otherwise with one domain and no imap usage you should be probably ok. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 2:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Upgrading to 8.11 You should be fine. Travis -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Carter Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 11:47 AM To: IMail Forum Subject: [IMail Forum] Upgrading to 8.11 I plan to install 8.1 and the patches through 8.11 in the next few days. I have looked through Imail KB and archives for issues to watch for. Was wondering if there was any other advice from the forum. Have one domain, use POP3 and web mail. Don't use IMAP, LDAP, or web calendar. - Know that new templates need to be installed. - Isn't there an issue of max mail default being changed to 10MB or was that only Killer Webmail? - Will need to review rules for \, [, etc. for negative effects. Any thing else to watch for would be appreciated. John To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Email not received from client: log shows it de livere d
Title: Message you could change the nul to another mailbox and then look at the headers -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Troy D. HiltonSent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 11:34 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Email not received from client: log shows it de livere d I have inbound rules set for my client to deliver emails that meet certain criteria to a ":NUL" address which deletes the email. I just didn't catch that when reading the SMTP logs. My problem now it to determine exactly which rule the emails are failing. Troy D. Hilton SofWerks LLC. [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean DianaSent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 10:18 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Email not received from client: log shows it de livere d At the risk of sounding stupid. How does -NUL indicate it was deleted ? Thank You,Sean DianaIT DepartmentInfosynch Inc.[EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Langston, CaleSent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 11:06 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Email not received from client: log shows it de livere d The message was deleted. The -NUL indicates it was deleted, probably due to the spam filtering rules you have in place. From: Troy D. Hilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 10:54 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ipswitch. comSubject: [IMail Forum] Email not received from client: log shows it delivere d Hello All, I have a client who is not able to receive emails from a particular domain. He's able to send emails fine but not receive them. The client did a test email to his customer and cc'd me. I checked the logs and the email was delivered to the customer fine, to which she replied to us. I checked t he logs and found that the logs showed the emails as being delivered yet neither I nor my client received anything. Here's the logs: SMTPD (69E1027C) [208.255.XXX.X] connect 12.37.XX.X port 4280 SMTPD (69E1027C) [12.37.XX.X] EHLO hal9000.us.nufarm.com SMTPD (69E1027C) [12.37.XX.X] MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SMTPD (69E1027C) [12.37.XX.X] RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SMTPD (69E1027C) [12.37.XX.X] F:\IMAIL\spool\D8eab69e1027c95ec.SMD 2731 SMTPD (00370210) [208.255.XXX.XX] connect 12.37.XX.X port 4285 SMTPD (00370210) [12.37.XX.X] EHLO hal9000.us.nufarm.com SMTPD (00370210) [12.37.XX.X] MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SMTPD (00370210) [12.37.XX.X] RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SMTPD (00370210) [12.37.XX.X] F:\IMAIL\spool\D8eac0037021099a5.SMD 2731 SMTP (804) processing F:\IMAIL\spool\Q8eab69e1027c95ec.SMD SMTP (5372) processing F:\IMAIL\spool\Q8eac0037021099a5.SMD SMTP (804) ldeliver tenkoz.com client-NUL (1) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 SMTP (804) finished F:\IMAIL\spool\Q8eab69e1027c95ec.SMD status=1 SMTP (5372) ldeliver sofwerks.com me-NUL (1) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 SMTP (5372) finished F:\IMAIL\spool\Q8eac0037021099a5.SMD status=1 Any thoughts on this? I've checked my kill file for the end customer's domain and found nothing. I've also checked my Declude spam account and found nothing. What am I missing here? Troy D. Hilton SofWerks LLC. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 302-529-1961
RE: [IMail Forum] Forwarding attachments
In webmail, choose Preferences from Account Options pull-down Check setting for: Replying: Include original message Don't include original message -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kathy Lees Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 3:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [IMail Forum] Forwarding attachments I have a user that says they can't forward attachments when they are logged onto the webmail. Any suggestions? To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Filters not working in v8.05
Title: Message I believe it must match three tests on that page of the SPAM settings... so three X-SPAM-DNSBL, or two of those and a X-IMAIL-SPAM-VALREVDNS for example would count as three -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jamie PriceSent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 10:47 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [IMail Forum] Filters not working in v8.05 Can someone tell me why the below message would get through my filters, even though I have Imail Admin set to 'delete message after 3 matches'??? Jamie Price ** Received: from c-24-18-167-181.client.comcast.net [24.18.167.181] bymail17.nospamweb.com(SMTPD32-8.05) id AA3C123B0142; Sun, 02 May 2004 18:46:20 -0400Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]From: "Lucinda Major" [EMAIL PROTECTED]To:Subject: [Spam?] Access to 300 Pharmaceuticals online! (including Soma)Date: Sun, 02 May 2004 19:39:58 -0400X-Mailer: jimmy automatekombu-sophoclean: yea curse christieMIME-Version: 1.0boundary="--94738775795056370774"X-IMAIL-SPAM-DNSBL: (fiveten,305856834,127.0.0.2)X-IMAIL-SPAM-DNSBL: (SpamCop,305856834,127.0.0.2)X-IMAIL-SPAM-HTML-FEATURES: (Image Tag)X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 at safesecureweb.comX-Spam-Warning: [Spam?] SpamAssassin score = 5X-Spam-Score: 7.01 (***)BAYES_99,BIZ_TLD,DRUGS_MUSCLE,HTML_70_80,HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_08,HTML_MESSAGEX-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.3994738775795056370774!--teledyne care augur vocalic carteladopt jejune monomer scribe stealthythe same** Regards,Jamie Price Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.HostMySite.comGet your FREE .com, .net, .org, .biz and .info domain name at HostMySite.com!Phone: International 302.731.4948 | Toll Free: 877-215-4678
[IMail Forum] Imail gateway for Exchange
I want to be able to use our IMAIL server to act as a gateway for mail bound for an exchange server, while continuing processing mail with Imail for other domains. Currently we have Imail running with one IP-ed domain and several virtual IP-less domains. These all use the same spam settings. This part will remain the same. If I wanted to use the same spam settings, I think I need to just add an MX record to the domain in question to point to the IMAIL box. The IMAIL box would have an entry in Hosts file to point to Exchange Box... Does that sound like all I need? If however I wanted different spam settings, I would need another IP-ed domain on Imail box and configure the spam settings there. I'd point the MX to a host at this new IP and still have entry in Hosts file for Exchange box. How would I configure the domain within Imail without using the domain name? To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] iMail 8.1 LDAP Problem
Do call ipswitch - perhaps they will fix if more people call. I too cannot start LDAP with the standard install or INIT. IPSwitch had me delete the slapd.conf file and all the folders that contain the user info and try to INIT... Same results. Then they had me do the same deletions, but only INIT one domain at a time... This did seem to work, although INIT on some domains stopped the ldap service again - but it was restartable... I have not yet done an INIT on most of the 150 domains on my server... I was hoping to wait for a fix because that is a tedious process to each one manually. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 10:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [IMail Forum] iMail 8.1 LDAP Problem Hi, I have upgraded my iMail server to 8.1. Ever since, I can't get LDAP to start. I've tried to change the LDAP port with no success. Here's the error I am getting. System Log The IMail LDAP Service service terminated with service-specific error 21. Application Log The description for Event ID ( 1281 ) in Source ( OpenLDAP-slapd ) cannot be found. The local computer may not have the necessary registry information or message DLL files to display messages from a remote computer. The following information is part of the event: . Thanks. Johnny To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] iMail 8.1 LDAP Problem
I just heard more from IpSwitch on this subject and I thought I'd pass it along They acknowledged that LDAP is a problem and here is a quote. is that the current LDAP service is not doing a very good job of handling systems with more than 30 or 40 domains. There will be a resolution in version 8.11, which should be available in the next week or two hopefully While manually doing INIT LDAP domain by domain worked for me, they warned about doing an INIT on too many domains... I have only done INIT on a few and it seems to work. I have about 150 domains on the server - but few users on most of them. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Comerford Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 11:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] iMail 8.1 LDAP Problem Do call ipswitch - perhaps they will fix if more people call. I too cannot start LDAP with the standard install or INIT. IPSwitch had me delete the slapd.conf file and all the folders that contain the user info and try to INIT... Same results. Then they had me do the same deletions, but only INIT one domain at a time... This did seem to work, although INIT on some domains stopped the ldap service again - but it was restartable... I have not yet done an INIT on most of the 150 domains on my server... I was hoping to wait for a fix because that is a tedious process to each one manually. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 10:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [IMail Forum] iMail 8.1 LDAP Problem Hi, I have upgraded my iMail server to 8.1. Ever since, I can't get LDAP to start. I've tried to change the LDAP port with no success. Here's the error I am getting. System Log The IMail LDAP Service service terminated with service-specific error 21. Application Log The description for Event ID ( 1281 ) in Source ( OpenLDAP-slapd ) cannot be found. The local computer may not have the necessary registry information or message DLL files to display messages from a remote computer. The following information is part of the event: . Thanks. Johnny To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Gigantic mailbox size
I've seen this as a result of corruption... The more you work with it the bigger it reports. You can try creating a new mailbox and dragging the messages into it using IMAP - This has worked for me sometimes, but other times it was one of the messages causing it and the corruption started anew... In this case you either need to isolate the message and get rid of it, or just delete the mailbox and create a new one... If you do isolate the message - try sending it to IPSWITCH -- Maybee they can prevent it if they know what causes it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Carr Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 9:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SV: [IMail Forum] Gigantic mailbox size There are 4 mailboxes - main, sent, and two others. The only one affected by the size/deletion problem is main. Main does not contain any subfolders.. -Opprinnelig melding- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne av Hermann Strassner Sendt: 15. april 2004 15:09 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: RE: [IMail Forum] Gigantic mailbox size Maybe there are Subfolders in this account? Hermann every once in a while, the webmail interface show a users mailbox as being a ridiculous size. Currently, we have one where webmail reports the size as 3gb, while the physical .mbx file is only about 80mb. When this happens, the user is unable to delete any mail. She checks the boxes, clicks delete, it loads for a while, then displays her mailbox again without any changes. Any ideas what is going on here? The quickfix is to delete the mailbox and start over, but that isn't an option in this case.. what can I do? To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] delivery rules failing
You can make several rules to deliver to main mailbox if it matches followed by a rule that catches anything else and deletes it. Since imail stops processing as soon as a rule matches it will never get to the delete rule if the address matches. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Oblio Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 12:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] delivery rules failing I don't think I can make a rule per address; I want it to bounce if != one of [x addresses]. How did you make yours work? At 04:25 PM 4/13/2004, you wrote: I had to do something similar before and I ran into the same problem... Used the AND OR stuff which should not even be in the interface if it does not work well, but that is another story. What I did was made a rule for each address instead of one large rule and it=t made my stuff work, I have not had a problem since. Good luck. To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] LDAP
I upgraded to 8.1 about 10 days ago. We never used LDAP, and had it off when upgrading. We did answer YES to convert question. After some delay, Imail started (without LDAP service running) and was running normal - before and after hotfixes - until yesterday. We patched windows with the latest fixes and rebooted. For kicks I tried INIT LDAP and SYNC LDAP last week with no different results -- it took a while to do something (5-10 mins at 100% CPU) did not start the service and did not work. Mail however worked fine as usual and rarely exceeded 40-50% of CPU. At that time LDAP tried to restart again (I have since found and removed the autostart in services) and failed and then machine was running slow. CPU is now averaging about 80-85% - I don't know if it is related to LDAP - but it is the first time I have rebooted since immediately after the install of 8.1 I am running on NT4. Event Viewer Errors below... I'd appreciate any hints as to where I should look as IMAIL has yet to answer my support requests - The errors in the event log when starting is: SYSTEM LOG - Event ID 7024: The Imail LDAP service terminated with service specific error 21. When I tried the INIT LDAP Last week I got these messages: The following error was listed about TEN times SYSTEM LOG - Event ID 7024: The Imail LDAP service terminated with service specific error 21. Followed by ONE instance of SYSTEM LOG - Event ID 7024: The Imail LDAP service terminated with service specific error 19. At about the same time, many instances of this error: APPLICATION LOG -- Event ID 1281 The description for the event Id (1281) in source ( OPENLDAP-slapd ) could not be found - it contains the following insertion string(s): . To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] LDAP
I forgot to mention that yesterday we installed microsoft windows patches, and rebooted... After that time is when CPU utilization was way up... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Comerford Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 12:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [IMail Forum] LDAP I upgraded to 8.1 about 10 days ago. We never used LDAP, and had it off when upgrading. We did answer YES to convert question. After some delay, Imail started (without LDAP service running) and was running normal - before and after hotfixes - until yesterday. We patched windows with the latest fixes and rebooted. For kicks I tried INIT LDAP and SYNC LDAP last week with no different results -- it took a while to do something (5-10 mins at 100% CPU) did not start the service and did not work. Mail however worked fine as usual and rarely exceeded 40-50% of CPU. At that time LDAP tried to restart again (I have since found and removed the autostart in services) and failed and then machine was running slow. CPU is now averaging about 80-85% - I don't know if it is related to LDAP - but it is the first time I have rebooted since immediately after the install of 8.1 I am running on NT4. Event Viewer Errors below... I'd appreciate any hints as to where I should look as IMAIL has yet to answer my support requests - The errors in the event log when starting is: SYSTEM LOG - Event ID 7024: The Imail LDAP service terminated with service specific error 21. When I tried the INIT LDAP Last week I got these messages: The following error was listed about TEN times SYSTEM LOG - Event ID 7024: The Imail LDAP service terminated with service specific error 21. Followed by ONE instance of SYSTEM LOG - Event ID 7024: The Imail LDAP service terminated with service specific error 19. At about the same time, many instances of this error: APPLICATION LOG -- Event ID 1281 The description for the event Id (1281) in source ( OPENLDAP-slapd ) could not be found - it contains the following insertion string(s): . To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] LDAP
Well, after a couple of hours my CPU utilization went back to normal (down less than 25% on average) and seems to be staying there... I would still like to know anyone's thoughts on the LDAP situation though. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Comerford Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 12:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [IMail Forum] LDAP I upgraded to 8.1 about 10 days ago. We never used LDAP, and had it off when upgrading. We did answer YES to convert question. After some delay, Imail started (without LDAP service running) and was running normal - before and after hotfixes - until yesterday. We patched windows with the latest fixes and rebooted. For kicks I tried INIT LDAP and SYNC LDAP last week with no different results -- it took a while to do something (5-10 mins at 100% CPU) did not start the service and did not work. Mail however worked fine as usual and rarely exceeded 40-50% of CPU. At that time LDAP tried to restart again (I have since found and removed the autostart in services) and failed and then machine was running slow. CPU is now averaging about 80-85% - I don't know if it is related to LDAP - but it is the first time I have rebooted since immediately after the install of 8.1 I am running on NT4. Event Viewer Errors below... I'd appreciate any hints as to where I should look as IMAIL has yet to answer my support requests - The errors in the event log when starting is: SYSTEM LOG - Event ID 7024: The Imail LDAP service terminated with service specific error 21. When I tried the INIT LDAP Last week I got these messages: The following error was listed about TEN times SYSTEM LOG - Event ID 7024: The Imail LDAP service terminated with service specific error 21. Followed by ONE instance of SYSTEM LOG - Event ID 7024: The Imail LDAP service terminated with service specific error 19. At about the same time, many instances of this error: APPLICATION LOG -- Event ID 1281 The description for the event Id (1281) in source ( OPENLDAP-slapd ) could not be found - it contains the following insertion string(s): . To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] LDAP
I agree that there is some bugs with install. Perhaps because of those bugs, I cannot get my LDAP service to even start. INIT will not work because (I am assuming) that the service will not start. Its not the end of the world for us because we never used it, but we would like to be able to store the employee names with their e-mail addresses, and the updgrade now needs LDAP to do that. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 3:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] LDAP I think there are osme bugs with the install routine as too many people have incomplete messages in the Event Viewers, howver, mine too took a long time to normlaize after I did the INIT. Now, though, it is working very very well aside from the incomplete Event Viewer messages. Hopefully since there are enough of us out there with the tweaked out logs, Ipswitch will make a HF. But since it doesn't actually stop the services from working I doubt it's a priority. Travis -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jim Comerford Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 12:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] LDAP Well, after a couple of hours my CPU utilization went back to normal (down less than 25% on average) and seems to be staying there... I would still like to know anyone's thoughts on the LDAP situation though. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Comerford Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 12:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [IMail Forum] LDAP I upgraded to 8.1 about 10 days ago. We never used LDAP, and had it off when upgrading. We did answer YES to convert question. After some delay, Imail started (without LDAP service running) and was running normal - before and after hotfixes - until yesterday. We patched windows with the latest fixes and rebooted. For kicks I tried INIT LDAP and SYNC LDAP last week with no different results -- it took a while to do something (5-10 mins at 100% CPU) did not start the service and did not work. Mail however worked fine as usual and rarely exceeded 40-50% of CPU. At that time LDAP tried to restart again (I have since found and removed the autostart in services) and failed and then machine was running slow. CPU is now averaging about 80-85% - I don't know if it is related to LDAP - but it is the first time I have rebooted since immediately after the install of 8.1 I am running on NT4. Event Viewer Errors below... I'd appreciate any hints as to where I should look as IMAIL has yet to answer my support requests -- -- - The errors in the event log when starting is: SYSTEM LOG - Event ID 7024: The Imail LDAP service terminated with service specific error21. When I tried the INIT LDAP Last week I got these messages: The following error was listed about TEN times SYSTEM LOG - Event ID 7024: The Imail LDAP service terminated with service specific error21. Followed by ONE instance of SYSTEM LOG - Event ID 7024: The Imail LDAP service terminated with service specific error19. At about the same time, many instances of this error: APPLICATION LOG -- Event ID 1281 The description for the event Id (1281) in source ( OPENLDAP-slapd ) could not be found - it contains the following insertion string(s): . To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] delivery rules failing
I'm not a rule expert, But it looks to me like It MUST match: F!~(klilly|mcleary|pmabry)@(wingedvictoryusa\.com|mail\.wingedvictoryusa \.com) -AND--- !F!~(catherine|donovan|melanie|tina)@(mail\.visitcanada\.com|visitcanada \.com) And since it cannot match BOTH of those it will never bounce... Dir you want to replace the !AND! With an !OR! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Oblio Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 10:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [IMail Forum] delivery rules failing third post; hoping for a response I'm having a problem with the delivery rules only partially working. Some addresses are allowed, some are not. The filter is designed to bounce everything that's not explicitly specified. Here's the statement from the log file. 04:07 17:04 SMTPD(10EB0102) [216.204.69.171] MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04:07 17:04 SMTPD(10EB0102) [216.204.69.171] RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04:07 17:04 SMTPD(10EB0102) [216.204.69.171] N:\spool\D6cdd10eb0102d1e2.SMD 2350 04:07 17:04 SMTP-(05002C3F) processing N:\spool\Q6cdd10eb0102d1e2.SMD 04:07 17:04 SMTP-(05002C3F) Inbound X-IMail-Rule: F!~(klilly|mcleary|pmabry)@(wingedvictoryusa\.com|mail\.wingedvictoryusa \.com)!AND!F!~(catherine|donovan|melanie|tina)@(mail\.visitcanada\.com|v isitcanada\.com):!BOUNCE! The from address on the sending email is this: From: Melanie Higgins [EMAIL PROTECTED] Why doesn't this work? To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] 8.05 Whitelisting not working
Title: Message Check the order of processing in 8.05... the "whitelist" feature did not work as one would expect -- some checks were done before the whitelist was checked... This has been changed in 8.1 to work more like one would expect a "whitelist" to work. I dont remember the order off hand but it is in the archives and/or documentation. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don KiiskilaSent: Monday, April 05, 2004 12:00 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [IMail Forum] 8.05 Whitelisting not working I was wondering if anyone else has an idea why my whitelisting isnt working: Ive put the whitelist into the root, Ive put it into the folder for our domain, and still it is not allowing whitelisted addresses/domains to slip through without being filtered. Everything is listed as it should be in the spam control email control panels in Imail, but they still are getting filtered improperly. We received approx 550 emails this weekend into the spam filter box, 26 false positives. All but one of the false positives were whitelisted addresses/domains. I know it isnt much spam, and I could have lived with the single false positive but for the fact that whitelisted emails are going through the spam filters. It makes me wonder if the products working properly. Don Kiiskila Network Administrator Snapstream Media LLC http://www.snapstream.com "You cannot make anything fool-proof. The fools are too inventive!"
[IMail Forum] Logo in templates
I am new to the classic templates due to the upgrade... I am trying to change the logo which appears on the login screen. My setup is to run only one domain on an IP and all other domains are virtual. I replaced the file logo.gif in the Imail/web directory with a new logo. If I login to any of the VIRTUAL domains login screens... I get the new logo, when I logon to the domain with the IP, the login screen shows the IPSWITCH logo... Can anyone point me in right direction. To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Statistical Filtering Settings?
Title: Message It works best if every user sends it an equal number of "good" and "spam" mail. To read up on it search for "antispamseeder". Basically you need to create a MBX file for "GOOD" mail and one for "SPAM"... then you need to run the antispamseeder on those files to "train" it. We use the default settings and regularly "train" with new spam after an initial "training" with good mail. Depending upon your user base you may need to "train" it more. For example we have foreign language clients which we had to disable it for due to high false positives. We also have a client involved with mortgages who needed to "train" theirs with lots of good mail to avoid false positives. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave HaussSent: Monday, March 22, 2004 8:56 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [IMail Forum] Statistical Filtering Settings? I sent a message the other day about the Statistical Filtering Settings and what is the best way to set this up. Someone said I have to train it for every user. I dont see how that is done in email. That would be a look of work for over 300+ users. I set it up for the following settings in IMAIL ADMIN: Probability new word is spam 80% An Email is spam when its calculated prob exceeds 85% Max # of works to use 15 I am using the files for phrases and words etc that come from ipswitch. Are these the best settings and if not what do U need to do? Its catching some spam and letting others through. Please email me back with any suggestions at [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Dave Hauss www.pinehill.k12.nj.us Pine Hill School District MIS Building 1202 Turnerville Road Pine Hill NJ 08021 (856) 719-2103 (856) 719-2111 [Fax]
RE: [IMail Forum] Imail Express
I do think I remember a problem that came out a while back about having a space in the pathname for Imail... I think if you search the archives you will find something on this... Sorry I cant be more specific, but the mention of the path made me remember it... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Lucido Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 11:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Imail Express Any idea why it works on my test server? The only thing I can thing of is that my test server is installed at c:\imail and my not-working server is installed at c:\program files\imail. If this is a non-working feature, wouldn't they disable it instead of giving a weird error? Regards, Paul - Original Message - From: E. Shanbrom (Ipswitch) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 10:15 AM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Imail Express If I'm not mistaken store forward is disabled in IMail express so it cannot be used as a gateway... Eric S - Original Message - From: Paul Lucido [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 10:59 AM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Imail Express It didn't exist originally. I believe it is created when you first create an IP. My server couldn't create it. Regards, Paul Paul W. Lucido 312-583-0065 - Original Message - From: Travis Rabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 9:47 AM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Imail Express Is it set as read-only? Travis -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Paul Lucido Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 7:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [IMail Forum] Imail Express I have installed Imail Express and am having problems with Relay for Addresses in SMTP Security. When I try to enter an address I receive: C:\Program Files\Imail\smtpd32.loc Failed to write access control file At first I thought this was simply an Express limitation. However, on my test server I can add addresses and it doesn't give me an error. I have changed the spool directory to d:\imail\spool, but I don't believe this is the issue. Thoughts? Help? Regards, Paul To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] List - Unauthorized poster...
I have a mailing list which has an authorized poster list. One individual who is on the authorized poster list has sent messages to the list before. Today he had one returned indicating he was an unauthorized poster. I checked and his e-mail address IS in the Authorized Poster list, but is lower case and in logs it shows upper case... Log entries: 03:10 09:28 334 LST membership message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03:10 09:28 334 LST [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] Article rejected, un-authorized poster of [EMAIL PROTECTED] The authorized poster list contains: [EMAIL PROTECTED] He is also listed as a member of the list. Should CASE matter?, any other Ideas? To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] more than 2 host.
Add multiple domains in host aliases separated by spaces. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grant Griffith - IMail Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 9:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] more than 2 host. Setup the alias to contain all for of the domains... mail.example1.com, example1.com, mail.example2.com, examples2.com, etc... Sincerely, Grant Griffith, Vice President EI8HT LEGS Web Management Co., Inc. http://www.getafreewebsite.com 877-483-3393 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of imail Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 9:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [IMail Forum] more than 2 host. What is the best way to have multiple domains send email to the same place? Imail lets you have a host name and an ailias, but I have some people that have 4 or more domains and they want all the email to go to the same place. To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Spanish words flagged as spam
We had so many problems with this for our foreign language clients, that we stopped using baesian filtering on those domains. You can teach the filter spanish by using the antispamseeder.exe program... You need to feed it both Good e-mail and SPAM... Search docs on antispamseeder they explain it fairly well. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Riddle Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 12:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [IMail Forum] Spanish words flagged as spam I am having a problem that one of our users is increasingly communicating with clients and friends in Spanish. The IMail AntiSpam filters are triggering on these new words and flagging them as spam which raises the score and flags the message. Anybody know of a fix for this? A Spanish language dictionary for IMail? To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] Utility to list usernames
Is there a utility either part of imail or external app, which will dump me out a simple list of all the usernames in the system into a text file. I need to edit the list and then use it in another program. I use latest version with many domains and virtual domains... I see one (ExtractUsers) listed in the archives, but the link to download it no longer works... -Jim To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] X header question
Title: Message http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/guide/imailug801/Chapter18%20AntiSpam9.html -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy TrippSent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 2:01 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [IMail Forum] X header question Does anyone have a list of all the possible ImailX headers that are inserted due to failed spam tests? ex. - X-Imail-Spam-$*$ Andy
