RE: [IMail Forum] Service Unavailable message?
Start by going to a command prompt and typing iisreset /restart without the quotes to restart IIS. Any error messages in the Windows event log? Is the IMAP service set to restart on unexpected stop? John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Dodell Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 7:16 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Service Unavailable message? Today, our mail server started serving up a Service Unavailable message to our web based customers.In addition, IMAP customers who didn't save their messages locally, lost some of their email. I tried to access through the Iadmin interface, and got the same Service Unavailable message ... and it looks like I lost some of my email too. Email delivery appears normal in the logs. Couldn't find any discussion of this in the Knowledge base. I'm running 9.23 David To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Imail Rules
Technically yes, but that would have a big cost in terms of resources used. There are better ways. John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Gordon Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 1:24 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Imail Rules Is it possible to set our server to accept incoming messages from a single ip address via rules? I would like to filter all of our email through a spam filter here in our office before sending it on. Thanks To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Need some smtp log help - hacked account?
I have seen this attempt on 2 servers and it succeeded on one server when some one set up a new domain and did not follow procedures to the T. Change the passwords of all ROOT accounts YESTERDAY. That is what is being used. The default root password is well known. BTW, Declude Hijack stops this spammer cold! Yes! John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chad Walter Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 9:50 AM To: imail_forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Need some smtp log help - hacked account? My log file was enormous this morning and realized that some spammer was sending email through my server. I am running 2006.022 (whatever the latest is). Being a relative novice to this stuff I was wondering as to how a spammer was able to do this. I was able to block the ip address but not until thousands of messages had been sent. I only allow relaying to local users, and the sender was not a local user ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). So how did this happen. I have been running Imail for 8 years without incident. I upgraded to the newest version of Imail this month. What settings am I missing? Below is a snippet of my log file. I replaced my domain and ip with mymaildomain.com http://responsiveinc.com/ [11.11.11.11], just so it wouldn't be found in google searches years from now. I would appreciate any insight or comments from anyone willing to offer them. Thanks in advance. 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d8301840da7) [x] doing direct send allstccath.org 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d8301840da7) Trying allstccath.org (0) 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d8301840da7) [x] Connecting socket to service SMTP on host allstccath.org using protocol tcp 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d8301840da7) [x] using source IP for mymaildomain.com http://responsiveinc.com [11.11.11.11] 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9dc601910dcc) recip is [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9dc601910dcc) [x] looking up colsd.org in HOSTS and MX 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9dc601910dcc) [x] looking up colsd.org in HOSTS and MX 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d9a01910db2) 250-rly-db01.mx.aol.com 84.fd.1243.static.theplanet.com 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d9a01910db2) 250 HELP 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d9a01910db2) MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d9a01910db2) 250 OK 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d9a01910db2) RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d8301840da7) 220 mx3.fuse.net ESMTP ecelerity 2.1.1.22 r(17669) Mon, 28 Jan 2008 04:18:24 -0500 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d8301840da7) Connect allstccath.org [216.68.8.213:25] (1) 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d8301840da7) EHLO responsiveinc.com 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d8d01a00dab) 250 Ok 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d8d01a00dab) DATA 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d8301840da7) 250-gwin3 says EHLO to 11.11.11.11 http://67.18.253.132 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d8301840da7) 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d8301840da7) 250-PIPELINING 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d8301840da7) 250 8BITMIME 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d8301840da7) MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d9a01910db2) 550 MAILBOX NOT FOUND 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d9a01910db2) Unexpected RCPT TO response from the SMTP server on aol.com: 550 MAILBOX NOT FOUND 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d9a01910db2) QUIT 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d8d01a00dab) 354 Feed me 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d8d01a00dab) . 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d8301840da7) 250 MAIL FROM accepted 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d8301840da7) RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d9a01910db2) 221 SERVICE CLOSING CHANNEL 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d9a01910db2) [u] closing socket (u) 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d9a01910db2) R[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d9a01910db2) R[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 4 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d9a01910db2) R[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 8 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d9a01910db2) R[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 8 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d9a01910db2) R[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d9a01910db2) R[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d9a01910db2) R[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 4 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d9a01910db2) R[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 4 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d9a01910db2) R[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 8 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d9a01910db2) R[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d9a01910db2) R[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 8 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d9a01910db2) R[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 8 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d9a01910db2) R[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d9a01910db2) R[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d9a01910db2) R[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d9a01910db2) R[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d9a01910db2) R[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d9a01910db2) R[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d9a01910db2) R[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d9a01910db2) R[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d9a01910db2) R[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d9a01910db2) R[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d9a01910db2) R[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1 01:28 03:18 SMTP-(9d9a01910db2) R[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1 01:28 03:18
RE: [IMail Forum] Multiple listening Ports in Imail
Additionally, while port 587 (which is reserved for the purpose of enforced SMTP authentication) is the default for the additional port, it can be changed. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 2:59 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Multiple listening Ports in Imail Depending upon the version, it will also listen to 587. Check the SMTP services properties. TR From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Stanford Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 2:52 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Multiple listening Ports in Imail Is it possible to have an additional port, besides 25, listening? If so How would I configure it? Thanks, Kevin
RE: [IMail Forum] Content Filtering in Imail
It doesn't. John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Stanford Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 7:35 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Content Filtering in Imail How does copy all block the attachment for review prior to release or delete? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Foresman Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 9:31 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Content Filtering in Imail Copy all. Regards, Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850-656-2644 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Stanford Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 10:26 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Content Filtering in Imail Does anyone know of a way to content filter on an entire domain and then review the content and release (or delete) on an as needed bases? Thanks, Kevin To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Italian Spam thru mail server
Not tedious at all if you are using Declude and have Hijack configured. Declude is the ONLY product that includes a specific way to track the number of outgoing email and define a policy on this. So, even if an account was comprised and they attempted to send through that account, Declude Hijack would catch it, even if authenticated. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chuck Schick Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 8:44 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Italian Spam thru mail server Troy usually this type of spammer will log on once and send 100s or 1000s of pieces of spam in the same session. We used the log analyze tool to help parse out which of our IPs was sending. Another way is to find the message ID of one of the pieces of spam and then track that back to a login ---it is tedious work. Chuck Schick Warp 8, Inc. (303)-421-5140 www.warp8.com _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Troy D. Hilton Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 9:25 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Italian Spam thru mail server I've checked through the logs and didn't see anything relating to an account on my server, but I'll check it again. Troy D. Hilton Serveon, Inc. 302-529-8640 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chuck Schick Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 11:17 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Italian Spam thru mail server Check to see if an account has been hijacked. Happened to us recently when a client had an account with the password the same as the account name. We found someone was sending chinese spam through our server, very similar to what you are seeing. Looking through the logs we were finally able to isolate the account they were logging on with in order to send. Chuck Schick Warp 8, Inc. (303)-421-5140 www.warp8.com _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Troy D. Hilton Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 9:53 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Italian Spam thru mail server Over the past few weeks I've been getting sporadic hits of Italian emails going thru my mail server. None of it appears to be addressed to any of my clients but its from some Italian address to a bunch of addresses, mostly Italian. I've run tests against my server and I'm not an open relay. I've been able to redirect the spam by IMail rules but this is tedious and I'm worried I'll get listed. In checking the logs I found the following line of text: Infobot message to not sent, precedence bulk Does this mean I've been hacked? Has anyone seen this before? Please advise. Troy D. Hilton Serveon, Inc. 302-529-8640 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [IMail Forum] User cannot login to email account
However, if Imail is doing that, deleting that file can cause emails to go byebye. I have seen it happen. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 11:15 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] User cannot login to email account Nope - it will just go away. TR From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 10:58 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] User cannot login to email account Delete the ~ file. Something is locking it - Av software, hung Send/Receive...could be a number of things. But if you delete the ~ file, it will pop right open. TR From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Troy D. Hilton Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 10:53 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] User cannot login to email account I've seen this before but can't recall the fix, and my searches in the IMail KB isn't helping. I have a user with a very large main.mbx file and he is unable to login to his email. He was receiving emails this morning then he started getting all of his old emails, well of a thousand. He canceled the process and ever since is unable to login. I noticed in his user file there is an main.~bx file along with his regular main.mbx file. The error he receives is: Receiving' reported error (0x8004210E) : 'Your mailbox is temporarily unavailable because another e-mail message is being delivered to it or another mail application is accessing it. The server responded: -ERR [IN-USE] failed to lock or parse or multiple access' IIRC, this is related to his mailbox being locked, I just can't recall how to unlock it. Please help. Thanks! Troy D. Hilton Serveon, Inc. 302-529-8640 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [IMail Forum] Alternative to dnsreport / dnsstuff
And I will freely and willingly continue to pay for both of those services to not only ensure I have access to those excellent resources, but others as well, for we all know that everything has costs associated with it and I can not in good conscience utilize and depend upon resources without providing a form of compensation for those resources. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Traylor Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 9:41 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Alternative to dnsreport / dnsstuff SJ.Stanaitis wrote: Yes, and you can continue to use Experts Exchange for free by changing your browser agent to Googlebot or simply by just scrolling all the way to the bottom. Exactly, what's wrong with that? Many sites/services/application designers ASK for donations or payment if we like the software but they still make it available regardless. Dnsstuff and Experts Exchange are no different. Feel free to support them with your $ if you want, I will continue to use what is freely available from them until they decide to no longer allow the free service. They provide a service, and yes - while there are obvious ways to use it without paying - IMHO they've earned it for providing such an outstanding tool. Sure they have, but it is an option and is not required to use their service. From the dnsstuff site's terms of use: MEMBERSHIP: The DNSstuff tools are made available for free on our website. Membership is granted to users on an individual basis for an annual fee. My only regret is that I can no longer watch HBO by holding down the correct 3 buttons on my wood-grain plastic cablebox. :) Or watch the adult channel, squiggly and without sound, by carefully adjusting the analog tuning dial on the old black and white TV. The point is, there is no reason to stop using dnsstuff just because they are asking for money now. Doug To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Requesting some speedy advice on send error 10054
I was just about to suggest the same. Try configuring the SMTP service to not accept connections from 64.18.1.0/24 and see what happens. John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Donnelly Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 9:00 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Requesting some speedy advice on send error 10054 I used the IP here to attempt a connection. On SMTP it timed out. On POP3 it connected, but with a significant delay. I did get this response: +OK X1 NT-POP3 Server joink.com (IMail 8.05 4399-11) You are running a version that is subject to attack and my guess is you have been hit... Are those 64.18.1.X addresses part of your network? I'd say that something is using up resources, slowing the POP3 connection and slowing SMTP to such a degree as clients timeout... Hmmm... not able to ping, at this time... HTH, Daniel Donnelly -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Simon Dodd Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 11:34 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Requesting some speedy advice on send error 10054 Thanks, but already confirmed that with the Imail SMTP service disabled, nothing else is running and connections aren't accepted on port 25. With it enabled, the supposition that _some_ users are getting connections seems to be confirmed by netstat: I see several dozen sections to port 25, for example: TCP63.134.128.131:25 24.206.192.33:3085 ESTABLISHED TCP63.134.128.131:25 63.134.135.222:25602 ESTABLISHED TCP63.134.128.131:25 63.134.146.4:4564 ESTABLISHED TCP63.134.128.131:25 63.134.146.4:4616 ESTABLISHED TCP63.134.128.131:25 63.134.146.4:4770 TIME_WAIT TCP63.134.128.131:25 63.134.146.4:4776 ESTABLISHED TCP63.134.128.131:25 63.134.149.193:1108TIME_WAIT TCP63.134.128.131:25 63.134.161.163:4260TIME_WAIT TCP63.134.128.131:25 63.134.177.202:4733TIME_WAIT TCP63.134.128.131:25 64.18.1.30:34353 ESTABLISHED TCP63.134.128.131:25 64.18.1.30:60389 ESTABLISHED TCP63.134.128.131:25 64.18.1.31:48099 LAST_ACK TCP63.134.128.131:25 64.18.1.31:53128 LAST_ACK TCP63.134.128.131:25 64.18.1.31:55431 ESTABLISHED TCP63.134.128.131:25 64.18.1.32:46421 ESTABLISHED TCP63.134.128.131:25 64.18.1.33:58792 ESTABLISHED TCP63.134.128.131:25 64.18.1.33:60265 ESTABLISHED TCP63.134.128.131:25 64.18.1.33:60711 ESTABLISHED TCP63.134.128.131:25 64.18.1.35:39097 LAST_ACK TCP63.134.128.131:25 64.18.1.35:43824 ESTABLISHED TCP63.134.128.131:25 64.18.1.35:44261 ESTABLISHED TCP63.134.128.131:25 64.18.1.35:44340 ESTABLISHED TCP63.134.128.131:25 64.18.1.35:44994 ESTABLISHED Yet I still can't open a connection on port 25 (yes, using telnet), even from the local machine, and users are still complaining (quite rightly, so far as I can see) that they can't send. ~s -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Len Conrad Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 11:05 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Requesting some speedy advice on send error 10054 there's nothing else that _should_ be active on 25 netstat -an | more and also google for TCP View. http://www.download.com/3001-2085_4-10558709.html?spi=97a8a3e0722 1b8fe77 82895d7b8cd234part=dl-AdvancedP telnet ip.ad.re.ss 25 ... to see if anything answers. Len To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] Requesting some speedy advice on send error 10054
The plot thickens. This is why it is important to tell us all details. I would still like you to temporarily stop incoming connections from Postini then and see what happens. Like some one else said, you are running a version of Imail subject to vulnerabilities. John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Simon Dodd Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 10:15 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] Requesting some speedy advice on send error 10054 You won't be able to connect on port 25 - connections are permitted inbound to it only from our network, certain explicitly allowed hosts, and from our spam filter (Postini, which is the 64.18.1.0 /24 addresses that John mentioned): the MX records for the six domains on this server point to Postini and Postini then relays to us, which allows us to shut out other traffic on 25. I don't know why you wouldn't be able to connect on 110, so it's not inconceivable that there's something ganked up on the pix, but that wouldn't make any difference to me sitting at the console of the server, I would think, and while I can connect to 110, I can't connect on 25. If the problem isn't the server's resources (memory and CPU use are nominal) or an unusually large number of connections (there's about 16,000 users on this server, so the loading I'm seeing in netstat is de minimis), could the problem be that somehow the number of concurrent connections that Imail can handle has dropped precipitously? If I unplug the network cable, after a short period I can connect to localhost 25, and having plugged it back in again, can continue to connect for a very short period before it slams back down again. ~Simon -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Len Conrad Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 12:14 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] Requesting some speedy advice on send error 10054 No: E:\imailtelnet 63.134.128.131 25 Connecting To 63.134.128.131...Could not open a connection to host on port 25 : Connect failed I can't telnet from Internet to :25, :587, :80, :100, can't ping (do you have all ICMP blocked?), and port scan of :25, :80, :110, :587 can't even connect to the IP. I don't get connection refused. I'd say somebody scrogged firewall rules somewhere. Len To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Alternative to dnsreport / dnsstuff
I believe a rate increase is coming, so it would be best to sign up now. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Stanford Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 11:55 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Alternative to dnsreport / dnsstuff I looked around and tried different free sites but none were as good and comprehensive as dnsstuff.com. I gladly plunked down $36.00 as my time was not worth trying to find the free stuff. Kevin _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Wolf Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 1:45 PM To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Alternative to dnsreport / dnsstuff I've used the free services at dnsreport.com and dnsstuff.com off and on for a few years. Yes, I know all the same info can be obtained using dig or nslookup, but the web page makes it easier. Seems they now want $36 per year for their service. Not worth it to me. Anyone know of a similar free service? Thanks, -Joe
RE: [IMail Forum] Alternative to dnsreport / dnsstuff
While there was some management and corporate problems in the time period following Scott's sale of the company, the staff in place now is quite helpful and committed to the cause. You should give them another try. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Wolf Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 12:15 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Alternative to dnsreport / dnsstuff Do you know who's behind dnsstuff.com? I remember the guy (not the name) that originally developed it, but he sold off most or all of his operations to the current Declude people. I try not to deal with them at all, but might be willing to sign up if it's not them. Thanks for the info... -Joe - Original Message - From: John T (lists) mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 1:58 PM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Alternative to dnsreport / dnsstuff I believe a rate increase is coming, so it would be best to sign up now. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Stanford Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 11:55 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Alternative to dnsreport / dnsstuff I looked around and tried different free sites but none were as good and comprehensive as dnsstuff.com. I gladly plunked down $36.00 as my time was not worth trying to find the free stuff. Kevin _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Wolf Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 1:45 PM To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Alternative to dnsreport / dnsstuff I've used the free services at dnsreport.com and dnsstuff.com off and on for a few years. Yes, I know all the same info can be obtained using dig or nslookup, but the web page makes it easier. Seems they now want $36 per year for their service. Not worth it to me. Anyone know of a similar free service? Thanks, -Joe
RE: Re[4]: [IMail Forum] Suddenly Imail Refusing Mail from Gateway Server
Alright, what I have been missing for a couple of years. I'll have my wife start making the popcorn now. John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Len Conrad Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 10:15 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re[4]: [IMail Forum] Suddenly Imail Refusing Mail from Gateway Server I will add, per usual, that a well-configured LDAP server can handle millions of recipient lookups per hour, and the claims of too much overhead are FUDdy. As per usual, total BS. :) Why would any MX design pass millions LDAP queries for bad recipients to a backend server when those queries can be totally blocked at a correctly designed MX? Len To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Suddenly Imail Refusing Mail from Gateway Server
Bill, I am looking forward to that. Would this be using the Declude logs or the Imail logs to gather the IPs to block? John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Foresman Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 4:43 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Suddenly Imail Refusing Mail from Gateway Server We're using the logs for data mining to determine what IP's to block. It's been extremely enlightening and productive. At this point we're trying to determine an algorythm to automate the process of identifying IP's that we're not going to accept maill from. Just after a few days we're denying connections from over 30,000 IP's that are absolutely spammers! We're going to release the software opensource as soon as possible. Regards, Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting 850-656-2644 -Original Message- From: Len Conrad [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent 11/23/2007 7:36:36 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Suddenly Imail Refusing Mail from Gateway Server So what does that translate to for Imail? Max two sessions? 1 bad recipient, then blacklist it? That seems awfully low. IMGate doesn't blacklist in a session. It disconnects the session after 2 5xx's. Eventually, through harvesting the mail log, enough sessions with (even one) bad recip, and the IP gets blacklisted. How many is enough? over how much time? day? week? The threshold depends on several other factors. eg, if the IP doesn't have a PTR, then the blacklist threshold is a lot lower than if it had an IP. And John is right. A gateway that accepts all recips and passes them to Imail is asking for trouble, is a useless gateway. Rejecting bad recips is the FIRST task of an MX gateway. Len To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Suddenly Imail Refusing Mail from Gateway Server
Why is your gateway server accepting email for non-existent addresses? That is the problem and that is what you have to resolve. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 3:46 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Suddenly Imail Refusing Mail from Gateway Server I did find this in the logs: 11:23 15:36 SMTPD(63ed01a50125) [65.74.132.77] Max Invalid RCPTs Exceeded This has never been an issue before - should I just up the limit in the SMTP services settings from 20 to something higher until it plays nice? What the recommended settings for dictionary attack? Is there a way to disable it? TR From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 3:39 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Suddenly Imail Refusing Mail from Gateway Server All, I noticed today that mail started not coming into the inboxes. I noticed that my SMTP gateway server IP was in the Control Access List as to deny email from it. I removed it from the list and after about 15 minutes it pops back up in there. Does anyone know why this might be happening and how to stop it? I did turn on verbose logging so I am going to download those now to take a look. Travis
RE: [IMail Forum] help me understand this log entry
It is trying to validate the from address, so it is doing a lookup for an MX record and if not found an A record for the domain of the from address, then trying to contact a email server at that IP address to see if the from address exists. John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J Porter Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 11:39 PM To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] help me understand this log entry I'm seeing an awful lot of the following log entry in my spam log... 10 to 15% of the total entries. === 11:07 00:00 SMTPD(403d01afe5f2) [0276] mydomainname.com VALIDATION: (MAIL FROM) mydomainname.com FAILED to communicate with server 208.xx.yy.zzz === When I look at the referenced SMTPD file in the spool, it doesn't contain the 208. class IP. The syslog doesn't show the 208 class IP either. The zzz varies over most of the whole Class C. The referenced A and D files are getting hung up in the spool directory and usually have to be deleted manually. The 'Received From' IP shown in the partial header of the D file is usually in my Declude Blacklist so the email doesn't get delivered to a mailbox. Since it is pretty much junk/spam anyway that's getting deleted, this is more of an annoyance than anything else and it clutters up the spam log making it much larger than it should be. I just can't see why IMail is trying to talk to these servers. TIA... ~Joe To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] help me understand this log entry
You missed the point. The IP it is coming from could be anything, especially if it is spam. In fact, if it is spam, it will not be coming from a valid IP for the domain since it is coming through either an open relay or a bot. It does not matter. Just because the headers say the email is from gmail.com does not mean it is going to come from a gmail IP address. That is spam fighting 101. Why are you concerned about seeing that in the log anyways? That is part of Antispam tests, and gee golly willikers there are likely to be errors seen since it is a spam email. That is the whole point, it is an error a failure of a test. If you really want to stop that error message, you would have to disable Imail's AntiSpam from address validation test. John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J Porter Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 11:56 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] help me understand this log entry yeah... but that's precisely the point. The IP shown in the email file header is NOT in the same domain as the server 208.x.y.z that IMail is trying to communicate with. It's something like 69.aaa..; a totally different Class A. Not only that, but the emails come from a bunch of DIFFERENT IPs. The 208.x.y.z is not shown anywhere in the email headers. More to the point... how do I stop all this crap??? The only consistent factor I can find is the 208.x.y.z that IMail is trying to talk to. But since this IP isn't in the header, I see no way to tell IMail or Declude to stop trying to talk to that server. - Original Message - From: John T (lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 2:12 AM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] help me understand this log entry It is trying to validate the from address, so it is doing a lookup for an MX record and if not found an A record for the domain of the from address, then trying to contact a email server at that IP address to see if the from address exists. John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J Porter Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 11:39 PM To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] help me understand this log entry I'm seeing an awful lot of the following log entry in my spam log... 10 to 15% of the total entries. === 11:07 00:00 SMTPD(403d01afe5f2) [0276] mydomainname.com VALIDATION: (MAIL FROM) mydomainname.com FAILED to communicate with server 208.xx.yy.zzz === When I look at the referenced SMTPD file in the spool, it doesn't contain the 208. class IP. The syslog doesn't show the 208 class IP either. The zzz varies over most of the whole Class C. The referenced A and D files are getting hung up in the spool directory and usually have to be deleted manually. The 'Received From' IP shown in the partial header of the D file is usually in my Declude Blacklist so the email doesn't get delivered to a mailbox. Since it is pretty much junk/spam anyway that's getting deleted, this is more of an annoyance than anything else and it clutters up the spam log making it much larger than it should be. I just can't see why IMail is trying to talk to these servers. TIA... ~Joe To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Undeliverable Mail
Is there a question, or is this just a statement? Assuming there is supposed to be a question, and assuming the question is along the lines of why is it rejected, the best entity to get the answer to that question would be the administrator of the server that is rejecting the message, as there is something on there that says to reject. I would have to say that all of us on here have failed the mind reader test, me more than once, and as such we cannot see across the Internet into the configuration of the receiving server to see why it is rejecting the email. John T _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark LeBlanc Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 7:18 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Undeliverable Mail I have a user getting the following message when sending to a particular user: Body of message generated response: 554 5.7.1 Message cannot be accepted, BW filter rejection I can send to the target address, but this user cannot. Mark LeBlanc Technology Director Tri-County RVTHS 147 Pond Street Franklin, MA 02038 508-528-5400 x219 attachment: winmail.dat
[IMail Forum] Emails to pacbell.net being denied.
I have had a couple of users report getting NDRs on emails sent to pacbell.net email addresses. I have verified this from 3 different Imail servers as well as from DSL Extreme account and from a Hotmail.com account. As soon as the MAIL FROM: command is sent, it responds 5.7.1 Access Denied. Anyone else seeing this? John T
RE: [IMail Forum] Emails to pacbell.net being denied.
I know what the response code is supposed to be, but this is someone sending email to their user. Like someone else said, maybe this is their new Antispam method, deny access from the rest of the internet. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Evans Martin Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 4:35 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Emails to pacbell.net being denied. That's an unable to relay or unable to authenticate type of message. I'm guessing you have to be on their network to send through their server? Evans Martin --- Evans L. Martin - Martek.Net http://www.martek.net / MartekWare.Com http://www.martekware.com Phone: (615) 533-0197 AOL IM: Martek01 Hosting Solutions Custom Software Development Home of iPlus Info Browser for IMail / SmarterMail Get the absolute best price on SmarterTools Software! _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists) Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 2:20 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Emails to pacbell.net being denied. I have had a couple of users report getting NDRs on emails sent to pacbell.net email addresses. I have verified this from 3 different Imail servers as well as from DSL Extreme account and from a Hotmail.com account. As soon as the MAIL FROM: command is sent, it responds 5.7.1 Access Denied. Anyone else seeing this? John T
RE: [IMail Forum] access list
Get a statement in writing from ARIN stating exactly which IP blocks are assigned to ISPs in those countries, which you will have to do again in 30 days since things change. You are better off using an RBL that is based upon country. Some Firewalls support the use of RBLs now. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 1:52 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] access list How can I simply block an entire country's email by using the access list? I'm done with spam from China and Amsterdam. Thanks, Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting file:///\\www.matrosity.com www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644
RE: [IMail Forum] Backscatter
No, if your server rejects it for invalid address, the sending server is the one that is generating the NDR, not yours. It is the problem of the sending server that is connecting to yours, that server is either acting as an open relay or has one (or more) of its users that is compromised. John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Hyer Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 11:36 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Backscatter This refers to someone sending TO an invalid address on my server and then the bounces go to the spoofed senders. It is a way to get spam to bounce off your server and get delivered. Doug Traylor wrote: Steve Hyer wrote: Does anyone have a work around to turn off non local NDR's to prevent backscatter in IMAIL? This would prevent people from spoofing the FROM and then sending to a known address that will bounce emails to have the bouncebacks consequently delivered to the spoofed FROM address. Are you referring to email To someone in your domain that is not a valid user, causing a local(?) NDR to go to the spoofed From address? Or, are you referring to an email To somebody outside of your domain but spoofed as From somebody in your domain and you are receiving the NDR's? Doug To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Backscatter
Then your server has an incorrect configuration. Why are you receiving email for invalid users? Imail does not work that way unless you are using the stupid worthless nobody alias. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Hyer Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 12:00 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Backscatter That is not true. The bouncebacks are generated from my server telling the sender that the address is invalid and consequently it forwards back the message being sent. That is the problem here. Most mail systems now have a way to turn off non local NDRs to prevent this, but IMAIL doesn't seem to have that necessary feature now. I need a work around. SJH John T (lists) wrote: No, if your server rejects it for invalid address, the sending server is the one that is generating the NDR, not yours. It is the problem of the sending server that is connecting to yours, that server is either acting as an open relay or has one (or more) of its users that is compromised. John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Hyer Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 11:36 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Backscatter This refers to someone sending TO an invalid address on my server and then the bounces go to the spoofed senders. It is a way to get spam to bounce off your server and get delivered. Doug Traylor wrote: Steve Hyer wrote: Does anyone have a work around to turn off non local NDR's to prevent backscatter in IMAIL? This would prevent people from spoofing the FROM and then sending to a known address that will bounce emails to have the bouncebacks consequently delivered to the spoofed FROM address. Are you referring to email To someone in your domain that is not a valid user, causing a local(?) NDR to go to the spoofed From address? Or, are you referring to an email To somebody outside of your domain but spoofed as From somebody in your domain and you are receiving the NDR's? Doug To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Backscatter
Ah, now the truth be told. It is a McCrappy problem. John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Stanford Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 1:03 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Backscatter Unfortunately I have McAfee's Webshield in front of my server on the same box. There is no way for me to drop mail destined for invalid recipients since it just passes through after virus/content filtering. This has caused a lot of bounce backs from within my server also. I had to put a rule in place to delete the emails with the bounce so that it is not passed back and forth. I am currently looking into Iron Port and Barracuda Spam Firewall to replace Webshield. I would certainly think either one of these solutions has the ability to do what you suggest. Thanks... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Marchette Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 2:45 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Backscatter This implies that you are accepting emails to unknown recipients, and then processing them, and bouncing if invalid. Instead, what you should do is drop mail destined for invalid recipients, at the envelope level. This way, there is never a bounce, just a dropped connection. If you have servers in front of Imail(sounds like you do), then make sure the recipient list is loaded there as well or that the front end mail gateway is checking back to Imail for valid recipients *before* it tries to accept mail. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Stanford Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 12:00 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Backscatter I don't understand My server receives an email to an unknown user on my domain. How can I turn it off so that my server does not send a notice back, to the spoofed address, that it is a bad address? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists) Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 1:49 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Backscatter No, if your server rejects it for invalid address, the sending server is the one that is generating the NDR, not yours. It is the problem of the sending server that is connecting to yours, that server is either acting as an open relay or has one (or more) of its users that is compromised. John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Hyer Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 11:36 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Backscatter This refers to someone sending TO an invalid address on my server and then the bounces go to the spoofed senders. It is a way to get spam to bounce off your server and get delivered. Doug Traylor wrote: Steve Hyer wrote: Does anyone have a work around to turn off non local NDR's to prevent backscatter in IMAIL? This would prevent people from spoofing the FROM and then sending to a known address that will bounce emails to have the bouncebacks consequently delivered to the spoofed FROM address. Are you referring to email To someone in your domain that is not a valid user, causing a local(?) NDR to go to the spoofed From address? Or, are you referring to an email To somebody outside of your domain but spoofed as From somebody in your domain and you are receiving the NDR's? Doug To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail
RE: [IMail Forum] OT: Barracuda 200/400
Travis, I have not used a Cuda but IMHO Declude beats all hands down. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 9:55 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] OT: Barracuda 200/400 All, For those of you using Barracuda appliance, may I get your feedback on your experience. Ease of use? Versus Imail Premium? Versus Symantec Mail Security? Versus anything else? Reliability? Regards, Travis
RE: [IMail Forum] Several issues with mail access
I was also interested in Zimbra, due to their association with Red Hat, but now I am wondering how their acquisition by Yahoo will affect the product and pricing structure. Although we are pretty much a Windows environment, I am somewhat apprehensive about managing an Exchange Server. Can anyone comment on how difficult that is? Managing/maintaining Exchange is as hard as your configuration is dynamic. If the most that occurs is adding and removing users, and mailing lists are based on mail enabled distribution groups, it is not really that hard as long as it is properly setup and configured. Most of the administration can be done through ADUC. Where it starts to get harder to manage is when you start having multiple administrators and/or different levels of administrators and different policies for different groups of users and users moving around within departments. Basically, the larger the organization the larger the overhead. John T To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] OT: Transferring Email From One Host To Another?
You will need to use an email client such as Outlook for this. Create one email account in Outlook to connect to the user on the hostway servers via POP3. Download all messages. Now create another email account in Outlook as a IMAP account to your server for the same user. Now MOVE the emails from the hostway account to the folders for the user account on your server. John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grant Griffith Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 8:10 PM To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] OT: Transferring Email From One Host To Another? Hello Everyone, Does anyone know of a tool that will allow me to transfer email from one hosting company to another? I have a client that has multiple sites hosted at Hostway.com and they are going to have us begin hosting their website and email. However I need to be able to pull the emails off of hostway's servers and place them on our servers. Does anyone know of a tool that will allow me to do this? Thanks, Grant Griffith To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Queue manager crashing - ERR 005 / Step = 222494a
we're running good old 8.05 with applicable patches. The last couple of days, queue manager has been stopping/crashing regularly, and I think I've found the reason. This excerpt from the syslog keeps repeating for each crash: SMTP-(09FC000C) ERR 005 - Send message thread exception handled Step = 222494a SMTP-(09FC000C) ERR 005 - Fatal error - shutdown started I've checked the SMD files related to the 09FC000C (and other) ID's, and almost every one looks like this: Well, it's not really good is it. This may be one of the 2 known vulnerabilities affecting your server. Options would be to upgrade or use a gateway that is not vulnerable. John T To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] Passwords in MS SQL database
Can some one verify how passwords are started in a MS SQL database for a ODBC based Imail 2006.21 domain? Are they in plain text or encrypted? John T To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Official Host name change
Did you follow the part in the KB about renaming the table in the database? John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Troy D. Hilton Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 12:30 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Official Host name change OK, so I followed the KB for changing the Official host name and primary host on the mailserver. Now, if I try to delete a user from the new host I'm prompted with a window to confirm the deletion, then the Imail Admin closes when I click OK. When I reopen the Imail Admin the user account is still there. Any thoughts to this? One thing that I didn't change was the SQL database table I use to authenticate user accounts. It's still labeled as 'twinstar_com', but it works fine. Would this cause this type of behavior? Troy D. Hilton Serveon, Inc. 302-529-8640 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 5:06 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Official Host name change Hi Troy, Just make sure you change all reference, and have forward and reverse DNS matching for that hostname as well, and you should be fine. If you run from the registry, you'll need to change the OHN value under the IP key, rename the key for the domain in question, and change the values under the Global key tat reference the domain. An easy way to find them all is to export the IMail key, open it in Notepad, and do a search. Darin. - Original Message - From: Troy D. Hilton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 4:51 PM Subject: [IMail Forum] Official Host name change Hello All, Our company recently sold out hosting domain name, twintar.com to another company. That said, I have to rename my IMail 7.15 server's Official Host Name to our new hosting domain name, colomysite.net. I found this article, http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-19991007-DM01.htm, in the KB which looks like hat I need, but is there anything else I need to be aware of in doing this? The twinstar.com host does have email accounts associated, about 9 in all, which I'll be keeping. Will changing the official host name also change the email host from twintar.com to colomysite.net, thus making the email addresses change, or do I need to take an extra step in this? Sorry if I already posted this issue but I've been a bit busy and want to be sure I've got my bases covered. Thanks for your insight! Troy D. Hilton Serveon, Inc. 302-529-8640 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [IMail Forum] Webmail issue
Yes John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sharyn Schmidt Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 8:04 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Webmail issue Would that be the main.xml?? -Original Message- From: Travis Rabe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 10:57 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Webmail issue Delete the XML file that is associated with his Inbox. TR From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sharyn Schmidt Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 7:53 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Webmail issue Hi, One of my users (and only 1) is getting this error when he tries to view messages in his inbox using Webmail: An error occurred and the messages could not be retrieved for the selected folder. You will now be returned to your home page. He can send mail via webmail and he can open his sent mail folder. Only his inbox seems to be having issues. He is the only one experiencing this, as far as I know. I have attempted to log into his webmail account from a different machine and am getting the same error. Anyone know what's happening or how to fix this? Thanks, Sharyn
RE: [IMail Forum] Double Filtering Continued ...
Using an example of you want it moved to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and to a folder for that user called class1 the first rule would forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Dodell Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2007 8:55 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Double Filtering Continued ... On Sep 2, 2007, at 8:39 AM, Tripp Allen wrote: Because you could create a rule to forward to one user, and that user could have a rule to forward back to the original user (thus killing the Queue Manager), IMail will not filter the message the second time. That makes sense ... any way you can think around this, ie in the first forward it would not only forward to the user but also the folder of the user? The reason I did this was because of the way my iPhone handles IMAP.It doesn't at this time allow you to select which folders you want to sync, so it ends up the all my spam / virus etc notifications, end up synching, when I really just want to see these on my desktop. I thought by having a second filter mailbox, that wouldn't sync with the iPhone ? To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail- archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Junk-Mail.mbx with 125 GB?
Search the archives, I believe it is a Outlook IMAP bug. Is this Outlook 2003 or 2007? John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hirthe, Alexander Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 12:52 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Junk-Mail.mbx with 125 GB? Hello, my personal JunkMail folder (IMap, IMail 8.22) has grown to 125 GB since Friday. The other admin killed the file, because the disk was full, so I can't tell you, what was in. Do you have an idea, what could happen to grow a file from about 5 MB to 125 GB? I'm looking in the logfiles now, maybe I can tell you more later. Alex _ Siller AG, Wannenaeckerstrasse 43, 74078 Heilbronn Vorstand: Prof. H.-F. Siller (Vorsitzender), Joern Buelow, Ralf Michi Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Armin Sohler Reg. Gericht Stuttgart, HRB 107707, Ust-Id Nr. DE145782955
RE: [IMail Forum] IMail 8.22 - Spool drive?
No, if it is a local user and the partition that is holding the mailboxes becomes full, it will bounce the email. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hirthe, Alexander Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 12:55 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] IMail 8.22 - Spool drive? Hello, our IMail drive was full, and Imail stopped queueing Mail. We have three drives, one system, one IMail and one for Spool and logfiles. I thought it would queue the files into the spooldrive, and deliver it, when the other disk is available again? But IMail didn't accept the mail and sent a disk full to the sender :-/ Alex _ Siller AG, Wannenaeckerstrasse 43, 74078 Heilbronn Vorstand: Prof. H.-F. Siller (Vorsitzender), Joern Buelow, Ralf Michi Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Armin Sohler Reg. Gericht Stuttgart, HRB 107707, Ust-Id Nr. DE145782955
RE: [IMail Forum] Junk-Mail.mbx with 125 GB?
Just a word of advice for those with users using Outlook and MAPI: One thing I have learned over time is that large inboxes create problems. What is the size of the inbox? What I tell users, and practice myself, is to create folders and move email out of the inbox to various folders whenever possible. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 9:49 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Junk-Mail.mbx with 125 GB? Indeed - Known Outlook IMAP problem. TR From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Gregg Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 9:44 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Junk-Mail.mbx with 125 GB? Have the affected user apply all patches for his/her Outlook client. This will decrease the frequency of this happening but will not prevent it. We've struggled with it for years. It affects only IMAP users with Outlook. Regards, David Gregg dgSoft Internet Services -- mxGuard for IMail The no-nonsense antispam and antivirus solution. Download a free 30-day trial at http://www.mxguard.com/postmaster/freetrial.asp -- _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hirthe, Alexander Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 12:52 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Junk-Mail.mbx with 125 GB? Hello, my personal JunkMail folder (IMap, IMail 8.22) has grown to 125 GB since Friday. The other admin killed the file, because the disk was full, so I can't tell you, what was in. Do you have an idea, what could happen to grow a file from about 5 MB to 125 GB? I'm looking in the logfiles now, maybe I can tell you more later. Alex _ Siller AG, Wannenaeckerstrasse 43, 74078 Heilbronn Vorstand: Prof. H.-F. Siller (Vorsitzender), Joern Buelow, Ralf Michi Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Armin Sohler Reg. Gericht Stuttgart, HRB 107707, Ust-Id Nr. DE145782955
RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] being a smart host without being an open relay
Someone else I spoke with who has some experience with Exchange also suggested configuring users' Outlook clients to POP/SMTP via our Imail server, and engage in IMAP only with the Exchange server. Then the Outlook clients could be configured to utilize SMTP AUTH with our server. Waste of time, lots of extra work, and wasted bandwidth for local-to-local traffic Plus you have the users now with 2 email accounts on their computer, and is a complete waste of having an Exchange server in the first place. John T To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] being a smart host without being an open relay
If it is a persistent connection, yes. I do this now for a client. There is a VPN between my servers and their network. Using Sonicwall Enhanced OS, you can control exactly what traffic is allowed across the VPN, so it is limited to only those protocols the client subscribes to the services for. Example, for this client I provide email gateway services. So the only traffic allowed through the VPN is SMTP. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Weisman Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 9:45 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] being a smart host without being an open relay What if their exchange servers VPN'd into your mail servers? You could use the private ip. -Jon - Original Message - From: Darin Cox mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 12:24 PM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] being a smart host without being an open relay You have two main options 1. Have them get a static IP, or 2. Have their Exchange server POP the messages from your server. Unfortunately, Exchange POP connectors cannot be configured to POP more frequently than every 15 minutes. That said, if they are using a dynamic DNS (DDNS) service, you could configure your server to relay to a hostname that is continually updated with the current IP via DDNS. Their may be some delays when the IP changes, depending on how quickly the DDNS is updated, and the TTL on the records. By far, the best solution is for them to spend a little more, and get a static IP. Darin. - Original Message - From: Adam Greene mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 11:47 AM Subject: [IMail Forum] being a smart host without being an open relay Hi! We're being approached by a networking company whose customers need Smart Host services. i.e. they run Exchange servers and are being blacklisted because some of the Exchange servers are assigned dynamic IP addresses. They want the Exchange servers to relay through us, so as not to get blacklisted. I don't quite understand how they could even be receiving email reliably with a dynamic IP address on their mail server; I'm checking with the networking company now. Maybe they're using some kind of dynamic DNS service? Anyways, I'm thinking about how to provide this service without becoming an open relay. I need the Exchange server to authenticate to Imail somehow. There's also the issue of outbound port 25 being blocked by many major ISP's. We've toyed with the idea of requiring SSL connections on port 465 from the Exchange server, but I'm not sure of what kind of server-to-server authentication I can set up in Imail to prevent us from becoming an open relay. Is someone else already doing this with Imail? What solution have you come up with? Thanks, Adam
RE: [IMail Forum] Email stuck in work folder
That is a Declude folder. If you must delete files from there, you will have to stop the decludeproc service first. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kathy Lees Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 12:09 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Email stuck in work folder WE have an email stuck in the WORK folder. When I try and delete it, it says that is being used by another person or program. Any suggestions?
RE: [IMail Forum] Calendar questions
Install Imail 2006.21 please. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Doyle Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 7:58 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Calendar questions We are running 2006.2 on a Window 2003 server with dual zeon 2 gb processors with 1.5 gig of memory. We did a clean install and migrated users from our old server to the new one. It's been running about a month or so and we are getting complaints on repsonse time for both web mail and web calendar. With no users on, it can take 5 and sometimes 10 seconds to log on to an account. This seems kind of long. Is this typical? Secondly the web calander page comes up and I can't tell if it's supposed to auto log on or simply wait for the user to enter his id and password. While it askes to save the user id and password, it never seems to take them. Thanks for any insight, John
RE: [IMail Forum] upgrading 2006.21 in Microsoft Windows 2003 Server SP2
There are no problems known at this time regarding specificly Windows Server 2003 SP2. John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jose Mª Valades Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 2:23 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] upgrading 2006.21 in Microsoft Windows 2003 Server SP2 I am going to update Imail 8,22 with Microsoft Windows 2003 Server SP2 to IMail 2006.21. It had read that were problems in Windows 2003 Server SP2 with IMail 2006.2. Is solved? I can update without problems? some experience? Thank you very much. _ Departamento Tecnico Mastercom mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bme.es Tel: 902 52 50 05 Nota legal Este mensaje electrónico contiene información de B.M.Extremadura, S.L con CIF: B-06162416 que es privada y confidencial, siendo para el uso exclusivo de la persona(s) entidad/es arriba encionada/s. Si usted no es el destinatario señalado, le informamos de que cualquier divulgación, copia, distribución o uso de los contenidos está prohibida. Si usted ha recibido este mensaje por error, por favor borre su contenido lo antes posible. Gracias. Si usted no desea recibir más información sobre futuras y posibles comunicaciones que le enviemos puede solicitarlo de forma gratuita en el correo electrónico [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - Normas para el correcto uso del correo electrónico: http://www.rediris.es/mail/estilo.html __ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail- archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Email archiving software?
We know how it is up there in the Peoples Republic of Santa Cruz. John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Doucette Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 8:08 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Email archiving software? Thanks for all the good info. Now I know where to begin. You guys are awesome (to use a California cliche)! ~Susan Susan Doucette Information Technology Santa Cruz City Schools 405 Old San Jose Rd. Soquel, CA 95073 831-429-3410 x212 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] upgrading 2006.21 RC1 to release version
Yes, run repair install. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bonno Bloksma Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 10:38 AM To: imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] upgrading 2006.21 RC1 to release version Hi, Been on hold with the support desk for 34 min now, calling from The Netherlands :-( Maybe someone overhere knows the answer. ;-) About a month ago I installed IMAil 2006.21 RC1 on my production server as the 2006.2 version was not stable and I had some vacation coming up. It's been quite solid, so I've had a quiet vacation. But now I want to install th real version, the 2006.21 release version. When I run the setup I do not get the option to Upgrade as it sees itself installed. So what next? I can first Uninstall, and then install. Or I could do a repair. Would a repair be enough, would it overwrite every RC1 file with the release version file? Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://www.tio.nl www.tio.nl
RE: [IMail Forum] Bounced Email
Well, I have been using Imail since version 6 and (cough) as long as I can remember (cough) it seems to me (cough) that Imail only accepts email (cough) for known Imail users. (Cough Cough) After all, Imail is not Exchange, or at least pre 2003 default configuration. Now, if Imail is serving as a gateway... John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Smith Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 1:49 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Bounced Email Okay, apparently I've either lost it or went to sleep and the world passed me by. Am I wrong or didn't Imail used to accept all incoming email and then send a bounce message back for unknown users? When/did it change? Did I just dream the bounce emails? Robert Smith To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail- archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Bounced Email
Senile? I am WAY too crazy to ever go senile. Don't you remember the old country song with the lyrics, I'm crazy but its keeping me from going insane! John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Smith Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 2:23 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Bounced Email John, Thank you... Guess I've been in la la land. Over the years we've had mail servers with 4 different packages on them and I'm guess I'm attributing someone else's shortcomings to Imail. Thanks, Rob PS Get something for that horrible cough! It might be contagious and apparently senility is already kicking in here, I don't need a cold on top of it! John T (lists) wrote: Well, I have been using Imail since version 6 and (cough) as long as I can remember (cough) it seems to me (cough) that Imail only accepts email (cough) for known Imail users. (Cough Cough) After all, Imail is not Exchange, or at least pre 2003 default configuration. Now, if Imail is serving as a gateway... John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Smith Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 1:49 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Bounced Email Okay, apparently I've either lost it or went to sleep and the world passed me by. Am I wrong or didn't Imail used to accept all incoming email and then send a bounce message back for unknown users? When/did it change? Did I just dream the bounce emails? Robert Smith To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail- archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.21 Webmail problems
Sounds like the Apple mail error that was in one of the betas. I do not know which tech you have worked with, but if you can send the mailbox file that contains the email in question to me so I can test it on my servers that would help narrow down the problem. John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Catuogno Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 8:31 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] 2006.21 Webmail problems Please forgive the long post, but I feel that 2006.21 needs an immediate patch. I'm tired of being scared to upgrade and then paying for a product that hasn't worked for years. IPSWITCH techs have been on my server for about 6 hours this week. They converted my contacts from MDB to SQL stating that access couldn't handle all the simultaneous hits. Next they changed some permissions on my ISS. Next they want to do a re-install to make sure all my Dll's and templates were correctly replaced properly during the upgrade. I may let them but I have little hope that it will work and I will have to downgrade to 2006.1 - 2006.21 was installed about a week ago since then we have logged and confirmed one defect: PDF attachments sent through the latest Thunderbird from a MAC running Leopard will cause webmail to crash and become unresponsive. Specifically the wpw3.exe service will consume 50%-60% of the CPU. With a 3mb attachment it wouldn't time out and the webmail wouldn't come back on until the process was stopped or the server was rebooted. Since then I see multiple errors in my event log, most of which cause webmail to freeze for a long time 5-10 minutes. Errors such as this: .NET Runtime 2.0 error EventType clr20r3, P1 w3wp.exe, P2 6.0.3790.3959, P3 45d6968e, P4 mscorlib, P5 2.0.0.0, P6 461eee3d, P7 373a, P8 3b, P9 system.argumentexception, P10 NIL. And many similar to this, failing on sending, previewing and opening/downloading: Event code: 3001 Event message: The request has been aborted. Event time: 8/9/2007 9:19:08 PM Event time (UTC): 8/10/2007 1:19:08 AM Event ID: 420fb2f25aaf4ec7993a396c94ebc7d0 Event sequence: 4030 Event occurrence: 1 Event detail code: 0 Application information: Application domain: /LM/W3SVC/798064825/Root/IClient-1-128311788600710458 Trust level: Full Application Virtual Path: /IClient Application Path: C:\Program Files\Ipswitch\IMail\WebDir\WebClient\ Machine name: (removed) Process information: Process ID: 3792 Process name: w3wp.exe Account name: NT AUTHORITY\NETWORK SERVICE Exception information: Exception type: HttpException Exception message: Request timed out. Request information: Request URL: http://webmail.prudentialrand.com/IClient/PreviewMsg.aspx?SeqNum=457486 580 Request path: /IClient/PreviewMsg.aspx User host address: 68.193.87.13 User: (Email address removed) Is authenticated: True Authentication Type: Forms Thread account name: NT AUTHORITY\NETWORK SERVICE Thread information: Thread ID: 1 Thread account name: NT AUTHORITY\NETWORK SERVICE Is impersonating: False Stack trace: Custom event details: For more information, see Help and Support Center at To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail- archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] WAY OT: For the DNS Gurus
The hosting company is using Host Headers and will direct incoming requests to the proper files by host header, not IP address. Find a new hosting company. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sharyn Schmidt Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 9:33 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] WAY OT: For the DNS Gurus We are using a hosting company. Our developer is putting together a website that will be accessed by handheld devices. We wanted to call the website http://emergency.floridadistillers.com http://emergency.floridadistillers.com to resolve to 64.79.167.6, which is the address of the box that the webhosting company gave us. The hosting company gave us one of their URL's to use: http:\\floridadist.web117.discountasp.net http://floridadist.web117.discountasp.net The developer informs me that the only way this website is going to work is if the URL that was provided by the hosting company is used, however, my boss wants to use the emergency.floridadisillers.com URL. I run my own primary nameserver here for floridadistillers.com. Originally, my thought was to just create an A record for emergency and point it to 64.79.167.6. Now I am being told that somehow I have to point emergency to floridadist.web117.discountasp.net. Is there a way to do this in my DNS? I thought maybe the alias record would work for this (I'm using MS DNS on a win2k server machine) but it's not resolving. Suggestions? Thanks, Sharyn
RE: [IMail Forum] Imail 8.22 IMAP and Windows Mobile Outlook
Using POP3, it is working. In fact, with the Motorola Q. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of SJ.Stanaitis Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 8:55 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Imail 8.22 IMAP and Windows Mobile Outlook Trying to get email to work right on a smart phone, Motorola Q running Windows Mobile 5 to be exact. Can't get it to actually download today's messages, can get it to download the past 3 days messages (headers only), but it only works right for a day or so - and then spits out various logon errors and other garbage. Has anyone actually gotten a smart phone (windows based) to interface with IMail properly? --SJ SJ.Stanaitis - Network Administrator Decorative Product Source, Inc
[IMail Forum] Imail 2006.21 SMTP crash poll
If you are experiencing the SMTP service in Imail 2006.21 crashing, please go to the following post on the Imail Forum and answer the poll. http://forums.ipswitch.com/Topic35400-10-1.aspx John T
[IMail Forum] OT: IMotors.com
If any on here knows who supports the Imail server for this domain, please contact me off list. Thank you. John T
RE: [IMail Forum] Journaling/Archiving
All email gets processed by SMTPD32.exe and QueueManager.exe, so using the copyall account will get a copy of all email. John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Taylor Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 11:13 AM To: IMail Mailing List Subject: [IMail Forum] Journaling/Archiving Hello all, I am the network admin for a school district. According to some recent law changes we are required to archive mail now. Is anyone else faced with this issue? How are you handling it? I can archive all inbound and outbound e-mail from users who are utilizing outlook or Thunderbird, but not web mail because internal messages never leave the IMail server. Let me know if you have any ideas! Thanks, Greg Taylor This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the originator. To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail- archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Journaling/Archiving
They are copied in realtime, as essentially the copyall account becomes a bcc sort of. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Taylor Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 1:49 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Journaling/Archiving How often do the messages get copied into the copy all mailbox? Also, couldn't you then copy over to a NAS to archive? - Greg Taylor -Original Message- From: Mark LeBlanc [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent 7/31/2007 3:42:25 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Journaling/Archiving Doug, Thanks for posting this. I have been using the primitive copy all then burn to DVD. Mark LeBlanc Technology Director Tri-County RVTHS 147 Pond Street Franklin, MA 02038 508-528-5400 x219 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas Denny Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 3:02 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Journaling/Archiving This might be worth evaluating: http://www.waterfordtechnologies.com/products/MailMeterArchive/index.asp Also, see: http://www.ipswitch.com/company/press_releases/060426_waterford.asp I've been scouring their docs on the web to determine if their implementation provides the ability to archive internal email communications (i.e. messages that don't leave the server), but so far haven't turned up anything conclusive. Knowing that a version created specifically for IMail exists seems promising. Doug -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Taylor Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 1:13 PM To: IMail Mailing List Subject: [IMail Forum] Journaling/Archiving Hello all, I am the network admin for a school district. According to some recent law changes we are required to archive mail now. Is anyone else faced with this issue? How are you handling it? I can archive all inbound and outbound e-mail from users who are utilizing outlook or Thunderbird, but not web mail because internal messages never leave the IMail server. Let me know if you have any ideas! Thanks, Greg Taylor This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the originator. To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ This e-mail message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains information that may be proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or copyrighted. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized agent, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and immediately delete this e-mail. Use, disclosure or reproduction of this e-mail by anyone other than the recipient(s) is strictly prohibited. The sender makes no representation that this e-mail or any attachments are free of viruses.
RE: [IMail Forum] rule does not work
I did not catch this before, you have periods, those have to be escaped.
openVPNUsersH~List-Id\: openvpn-users\.lists\.sourceforge\.net:Other
lists\OpenVPN-Users
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bonno Bloksma
Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2007 12:43 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] rule does not work
Hi,
Well,
OpenVPNUsersH~List-Id\: openvpn-users.lists.sourceforge.net:Other
lists\OpenVpn-Users
dit not work. I'll try some else next. I'll try
OpenVPNUsersH~List-Id\: \openvpn-users.lists.sourceforge.net\:Other
lists\OpenVpn-Users
and see if maybe I DID have to escape the brackets.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Bonno Bloksma
hoofd systeembeheer
tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme
begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://www.tio.nl/
www.tio.nl
- Original Message -
From: Bonno Bloksma mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 3:09 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] rule does not work
Hi,
The on-line manual states:
Note: The following characters have special meaning in a rule: {} () | * + ,
. : \If you want to use one of these characters in a search string,
precede it with a backslash. For example, to search for a plus sign, enter
\+ in the search string.
So, escaping the space might have been the error in that rule. I thought I
needed tot escape the and because they now too have a special meaning,
the name of the rule. But, indeed tha manual does not say so.
I'll change the rule to
OpenVPNUsersH~List-Id\: openvpn-users.lists.sourceforge.net:Other
lists\OpenVpn-Users
and see what that will do.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Bonno Bloksma
hoofd systeembeheer
tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme
begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://www.tio.nl/
www.tio.nl
- Original Message -
From: John T (lists) mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 8:38 AM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] rule does not work
Why did you escape the space that is between List-Id\: and \openvpn?
Also, I do not think you have to escape the or characters, do you?
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bonno Bloksma
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 10:27 PM
To: IMail_Forum
Subject: [IMail Forum] rule does not work
Hi,
Why does this rule not work:
OpenVPNUsersH~List-Id\:\ \openvpn-users.lists.sourceforge.net\:Other
lists\OpenVpn-Users
As far as I know I have escaped all the special chars
This is part of the header of a message in that list:
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8
Precedence: list
List-Id: openvpn-users.lists.sourceforge.net
List-Unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users,
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message was not transferred to proper folder. Another similar rule:
DecludeJunkmailH~listid.declude.junkmail:Other lists\Declude junkmail
does work properly. Header for such a message are:
X-Identity: 70.91.134.41 | 70-91-134-41-ma-ne.hfc.comcastbusiness.net |
declude.com
List-Id: listid.declude.junkmail.-1671003854956.smtp.declude.com
X-Mailing-List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For now I've changed the OpenVpn rule to:
OpenVPNUsersS~\[Openvpn-users\]:Other lists\OpenVpn-Users
but I kinda like the list-id stuff as that will not get confused during
crossposting a reply as happens sometimes with similar lists like declude
junkmail and virus and with openvpn users and developers.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Bonno Bloksma
hoofd systeembeheer
tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme
begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://www.tio.nl
www.tio.nl
RE: [IMail Forum] rule does not work
Why did you escape the space that is between List-Id\: and \openvpn? Also, I do not think you have to escape the or characters, do you? John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bonno Bloksma Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 10:27 PM To: IMail_Forum Subject: [IMail Forum] rule does not work Hi, Why does this rule not work: OpenVPNUsersH~List-Id\:\ \openvpn-users.lists.sourceforge.net\:Other lists\OpenVpn-Users As far as I know I have escaped all the special chars This is part of the header of a message in that list: X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: openvpn-users.lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This message was not transferred to proper folder. Another similar rule: DecludeJunkmailH~listid.declude.junkmail:Other lists\Declude junkmail does work properly. Header for such a message are: X-Identity: 70.91.134.41 | 70-91-134-41-ma-ne.hfc.comcastbusiness.net | declude.com List-Id: listid.declude.junkmail.-1671003854956.smtp.declude.com X-Mailing-List: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For now I've changed the OpenVpn rule to: OpenVPNUsersS~\[Openvpn-users\]:Other lists\OpenVpn-Users but I kinda like the list-id stuff as that will not get confused during crossposting a reply as happens sometimes with similar lists like declude junkmail and virus and with openvpn users and developers. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://www.tio.nl www.tio.nl
[IMail Forum] Antispam tests and a gateway server.
This is for a client that does not have Declude on his server. How does SPF checks in Imail antispam work when in incoming email is first received by a gateway server and then sent to Imail? Is there a way to have Imail anitspam checks skip an internal or trusted IP address and instead run checks on the IP address seen in the headers before that trusted IP? John T To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Antispam tests and a gateway server.
Tis' why Declude is so great. John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 12:12 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Antispam tests and a gateway server. Nope - there is no way top bypass this behavior. All connection tests are done on the Gateway server. TR -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists) Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 12:05 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Antispam tests and a gateway server. This is for a client that does not have Declude on his server. How does SPF checks in Imail antispam work when in incoming email is first received by a gateway server and then sent to Imail? Is there a way to have Imail anitspam checks skip an internal or trusted IP address and instead run checks on the IP address seen in the headers before that trusted IP? John T To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail- archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail- archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] user Web Messaging problem after upgrade
America Off Line strikes again. John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Doucette Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 4:30 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] user Web Messaging problem after upgrade Hi Bruce, Thanks for the heads-up. I haven't checked to see how many of my users might have AOL at home so I don't know how many calls I'll get but at least I know what to tell them now. (I never did like AOL.) ~Susan Bruce Barnes wrote: Susan, Use ANY other browser besides AOL. AOL's browser, especially in recent upgrades to version 9, always done silently by AOL at user sign off, cause LOTS of problems with lots of web based applications. We have a group of ambulatory surgery centers and have FORBIDDEN the use of AOL on all of the company's desktops and laptops. We supply their work e-mail and they don't need to have access to any other e-mail when they are at work or are using a company supplied computer - no exceptions. If the user has broadband DSL or cable modem, all they have to do is open a session of another browser. If they have to DIAL UP to AOL, then they will need to connect to AOL, minimize the instance of AOL, and open another browser window. Bruce Barnes ChicagoNetTech -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Doucette Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 17:45 To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] user Web Messaging problem after upgrade I upgraded the mail server from 2006.1 to 2006.21 on Thursday. I tried testing everything and it looked pretty good. But this morning I received a call from a user saying she can't get into her email using WebMessaging. Apparently she's getting logged in but the circle just spins and it doesn't display the 49 messages it says are in her Inbox. She's using AOL to access WebMessaging and I asked her to clear the cache. That doesn't seem to have helped. Anyone else having this problem? Any ideas how I can fix it? WebMessaging works fine from my office using Firefox or IE. Thanks, ~Susan -- Susan Doucette Information Technology Santa Cruz City Schools 405 Old San Jose Rd. Soquel, CA 95073 831-429-3410 x212 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail- archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] user Web Messaging problem after upgrade
If a reboot only cleared temporarily and it comes back, do your users have save username and save password checked? If so, have them uncheck it, log in, then they can check it again. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joseph Gray Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 8:15 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] user Web Messaging problem after upgrade I just upgraded on Sunday from 2006.1 to 2006.21 and experienced a similar issue tonight. Using IE 7.x on fully patched WinXP, web messaging hung on logon. Using Firefox 2.0.0.5 on fully patched WinXP box, web messaging hung on logon. Single mx domain on server with under 500 accounts. Broadband speeds all the way around. Threw up my hands and restarted entire server after simply restarting services, failed to correct the issue. Reboot worked. Log files unclear so far. Has anyone else seen this yet? -Joe -Original Message- From: Susan Doucette [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent 7/23/2007 7:30:29 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] user Web Messaging problem after upgrade Hi Bruce, Thanks for the heads-up. I haven't checked to see how many of my users might have AOL at home so I don't know how many calls I'll get but at least I know what to tell them now. (I never did like AOL.) ~Susan Bruce Barnes wrote: Susan, Use ANY other browser besides AOL. AOL's browser, especially in recent upgrades to version 9, always done silently by AOL at user sign off, cause LOTS of problems with lots of web based applications. We have a group of ambulatory surgery centers and have FORBIDDEN the use of AOL on all of the company's desktops and laptops. We supply their work e-mail and they don't need to have access to any other e-mail when they are at work or are using a company supplied computer - no exceptions. If the user has broadband DSL or cable modem, all they have to do is open a session of another browser. If they have to DIAL UP to AOL, then they will need to connect to AOL, minimize the instance of AOL, and open another browser window. Bruce Barnes ChicagoNetTech -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Doucette Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 17:45 To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] user Web Messaging problem after upgrade I upgraded the mail server from 2006.1 to 2006.21 on Thursday. I tried testing everything and it looked pretty good. But this morning I received a call from a user saying she can't get into her email using WebMessaging. Apparently she's getting logged in but the circle just spins and it doesn't display the 49 messages it says are in her Inbox. She's using AOL to access WebMessaging and I asked her to clear the cache. That doesn't seem to have helped. Anyone else having this problem? Any ideas how I can fix it? WebMessaging works fine from my office using Firefox or IE. Thanks, ~Susan -- Susan Doucette Information Technology Santa Cruz City Schools 405 Old San Jose Rd. Soquel, CA 95073 831-429-3410 x212 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] ClamAV with 2006.2
Yes, this is normal. However, if you search the Declude Virus archives, you will find information on what is called the clam wrapper that some say have helped. John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Imail Admin Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 2:31 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] ClamAV with 2006.2 Hi, We installed ClamAV for the first time on our test 2006.2 machine. It seems to run really heavy in the CPUs -- sometimes pegging the CPU for minutes. Is this normal for Clam? Is there a way to prevent this? Thanks, Ben BC Web To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail- archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Upgrade to 2006.21 -Install error messsage/file - popup window Domain Registry check error
Why do you have both public and private IPs on the same NIC? John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Smith (N.O.R.A.D.) Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 10:34 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Upgrade to 2006.21 -Install error messsage/file - popup window Domain Registry check error We are an ISP with 30 virtual domains and 1 primary domain norad.com for company use. NIC card settings PUBLIC:65.240.224.170 PRIVATE:172.16.4.170 I got the following error upgrading from Imail premium 2006.2 to premium 2006.21 Starting Domain Registry check System IP found - 172.16.4.170 System IP found - 65.240.224.170 Primary Host norad17.norad.com address is 65.240.224.170 Domain / official mismatch: official - norad17.norad.com Address - 65.240.224.170 Dup Official norad17.norad.com Official 65.240.224.170 and 172.16.4.170 Domain registry check complete I have the following settings on my systems setting config page Domain Name (OHN): norad17.norad.com Default Host: norad17.norad.com _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kurt Stocker Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 1:11 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Upgrade to 2006.21 Great conversations We also are having troubles with upgrade and our tech people are looking at other options. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heimir Eidskrem Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:44 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Upgrade to 2006.21 tnichols wrote: I know that part but I can't call for support. I basically paid for a product 20 months ago that has not been ready for prime time before now. So, why dont Ipswitch step up and extend the support plan so we can actually get some usage out of it. If your service agreement was valid when 2006 first came out, you are entitled to 2006.21. Go here: http://www.ipswitch.com/apps/download_center/ It will ask for serial number and registered email address. You will then be able to get both the download and the license key. Ted Nichols Ipswitch Messaging QA _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heimir Eidskrem Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:20 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Upgrade to 2006.21 Mark Reimer wrote: How are the upgrades going? I'm thinking about upgrading today and just wanted to know if the overall consensus is good or bad for those that have upgraded. Mark Reimer IT System Admin American CareSource 972-308-6887 I am considering it too. But I think my support contract did expire and I have never installed any 2006 version since they where not ready for usage. If Ipswitch would kindly extend my contract so I can install this version and still have some support that would nice. I will not pay another dime to Ipswitch before they have the product I paid for working. So pretty please?
RE: [IMail Forum] Upgrade to 2006.21 -Install error messsage/file - popup window Domain Registry check error
OK, that begets another question, why? Yes, this is leading to why are you seeing that error. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Smith (N.O.R.A.D.) Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:57 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Upgrade to 2006.21 -Install error messsage/file - popup window Domain Registry check error They are on separate internal nics , I outlined it wrong in the email. _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists) Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 2:23 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Upgrade to 2006.21 -Install error messsage/file - popup window Domain Registry check error Why do you have both public and private IPs on the same NIC? John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Smith (N.O.R.A.D.) Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 10:34 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Upgrade to 2006.21 -Install error messsage/file - popup window Domain Registry check error We are an ISP with 30 virtual domains and 1 primary domain norad.com for company use. NIC card settings PUBLIC:65.240.224.170 PRIVATE:172.16.4.170 I got the following error upgrading from Imail premium 2006.2 to premium 2006.21 Starting Domain Registry check System IP found - 172.16.4.170 System IP found - 65.240.224.170 Primary Host norad17.norad.com address is 65.240.224.170 Domain / official mismatch: official - norad17.norad.com Address - 65.240.224.170 Dup Official norad17.norad.com Official 65.240.224.170 and 172.16.4.170 Domain registry check complete I have the following settings on my systems setting config page Domain Name (OHN): norad17.norad.com Default Host: norad17.norad.com _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kurt Stocker Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 1:11 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Upgrade to 2006.21 Great conversations We also are having troubles with upgrade and our tech people are looking at other options. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heimir Eidskrem Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:44 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Upgrade to 2006.21 tnichols wrote: I know that part but I can't call for support. I basically paid for a product 20 months ago that has not been ready for prime time before now. So, why dont Ipswitch step up and extend the support plan so we can actually get some usage out of it. If your service agreement was valid when 2006 first came out, you are entitled to 2006.21. Go here: http://www.ipswitch.com/apps/download_center/ It will ask for serial number and registered email address. You will then be able to get both the download and the license key. Ted Nichols Ipswitch Messaging QA _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heimir Eidskrem Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:20 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Upgrade to 2006.21 Mark Reimer wrote: How are the upgrades going? I'm thinking about upgrading today and just wanted to know if the overall consensus is good or bad for those that have upgraded. Mark Reimer IT System Admin American CareSource 972-308-6887 I am considering it too. But I think my support contract did expire and I have never installed any 2006 version since they where not ready for usage. If Ipswitch would kindly extend my contract so I can install this version and still have some support that would nice. I will not pay another dime to Ipswitch before they have the product I paid for working. So pretty please?
RE: [IMail Forum] Upgrade to 2006.21 -Install error messsage/file - popup window Domain Registry check error
Well, then I guess you can ignore the registry check the Ipswitch has now included to help catch problems since it has been working fine for you for years. However, other people would have the opinion that having 2 NICS on a server, one for internal and one for external, is not recommended and can lead to problems. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Smith (N.O.R.A.D.) Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 12:16 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Upgrade to 2006.21 -Install error messsage/file - popup window Domain Registry check error The public nic is for internet traffic , the private nic is for nightly backups and a path to our internal dns server. I have had this network config since version 7.xx destroy all copies of the original message. _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists) Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 3:07 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Upgrade to 2006.21 -Install error messsage/file - popup window Domain Registry check error OK, that begets another question, why? Yes, this is leading to why are you seeing that error. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Smith (N.O.R.A.D.) Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:57 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Upgrade to 2006.21 -Install error messsage/file - popup window Domain Registry check error They are on separate internal nics , I outlined it wrong in the email. _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists) Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 2:23 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Upgrade to 2006.21 -Install error messsage/file - popup window Domain Registry check error Why do you have both public and private IPs on the same NIC? John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Smith (N.O.R.A.D.) Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 10:34 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Upgrade to 2006.21 -Install error messsage/file - popup window Domain Registry check error We are an ISP with 30 virtual domains and 1 primary domain norad.com for company use. NIC card settings PUBLIC:65.240.224.170 PRIVATE:172.16.4.170 I got the following error upgrading from Imail premium 2006.2 to premium 2006.21 Starting Domain Registry check System IP found - 172.16.4.170 System IP found - 65.240.224.170 Primary Host norad17.norad.com address is 65.240.224.170 Domain / official mismatch: official - norad17.norad.com Address - 65.240.224.170 Dup Official norad17.norad.com Official 65.240.224.170 and 172.16.4.170 Domain registry check complete I have the following settings on my systems setting config page Domain Name (OHN): norad17.norad.com Default Host: norad17.norad.com _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kurt Stocker Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 1:11 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Upgrade to 2006.21 Great conversations We also are having troubles with upgrade and our tech people are looking at other options. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heimir Eidskrem Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:44 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Upgrade to 2006.21 tnichols wrote: I know that part but I can't call for support. I basically paid for a product 20 months ago that has not been ready for prime time before now. So, why dont Ipswitch step up and extend the support plan so we can actually get some usage out of it. If your service agreement was valid when 2006 first came out, you are entitled to 2006.21. Go here: http://www.ipswitch.com/apps/download_center/ It will ask for serial number and registered email address. You will then be able to get both the download and the license key. Ted Nichols Ipswitch Messaging QA _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heimir Eidskrem Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:20 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Upgrade to 2006.21 Mark Reimer wrote: How are the upgrades going? I'm thinking about upgrading today and just wanted to know if the overall consensus is good or bad for those that have upgraded. Mark Reimer IT System Admin American CareSource 972-308-6887 I am considering it too. But I think my support contract did expire and I have never installed any 2006 version since they where not ready for usage. If Ipswitch would kindly extend my contract so I can install this version and still have some support that would nice. I will not pay another dime to Ipswitch before they have the product I paid for working. So pretty
RE: [IMail Forum] Upgraded / webmail not allowing logins
If you have virutual domains, no. John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Grosshandler Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 3:27 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Upgraded / webmail not allowing logins Aha! Requires [EMAIL PROTECTED], where before simply testaccount would work. Is there a way to get the old behavior back? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 4:52 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Upgraded / webmail not allowing logins Do they have remember userid and password selected? Try to turn that off then log in which should generate new data and then try to check it again. Tripp - Original Message - From: Robert Grosshandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 5:30 PM Subject: [IMail Forum] Upgraded / webmail not allowing logins Hi Upgraded to 2006.21 from 2006.2 No apparent problems. However, users cannot login via webmail (states bad login / password combo). Can login in to admin. Can send and retrieve email via POP (Outlook.) Where to start looking? Did I miss something in readme? Thanks, Rob To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail- archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail- archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail- archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
[IMail Forum] Imail accepted weird recp address
Imail accepted an incoming postmaster notice to 1) a non-existant domain and 2) an address with odd characters. Can some one explain this, I have not seen this before? The domain does not exist anywhere on Imail, it used to be a host alias for a previous virtual host. The username Maldonado never existed either. This is taken from the actual Q file. NRCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] R[EMAIL PROTECTED] X1 John T To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Imail accepted weird recp address
I should have said I already did that. John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 7:03 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Imail accepted weird recp address Check for hosts file for ssanaheim.com. Tripp - Original Message - From: John T (lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 9:46 PM Subject: [IMail Forum] Imail accepted weird recp address Imail accepted an incoming postmaster notice to 1) a non-existant domain and 2) an address with odd characters. Can some one explain this, I have not seen this before? The domain does not exist anywhere on Imail, it used to be a host alias for a previous virtual host. The username Maldonado never existed either. This is taken from the actual Q file. NRCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] R[EMAIL PROTECTED] X1 John T To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail- archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail- archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] how do i determine what account has been compromised?
What version of Imail are you using? Earlier than 7 I think. John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Katherine Kennedy Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 1:37 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] how do i determine what account has been compromised? How do you tie this: 07:17 03:40 SMTPD(05F8) Authenticated [EMAIL PROTECTED], session treated as local To this?? 07:17 03:40 SMTPD(3A68012A) [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx] connect 194.177.96.73 port 3681 07:17 03:40 SMTPD(3A68012A) [194.177.96.73] MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 07:17 03:40 SMTPD(3A68012A) [194.177.96.73] RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 07:17 03:40 SMTPD(3A68012A) [194.177.96.73] EHLO User 07:17 03:40 SMTPD(3A68012A) [194.177.96.73] D:\IMail\spool\D9c983a68012a3c75.SMD 1687 07:17 03:40 SMTP-() Info - Adding Queue file D:\IMail\spool\Q9c983a68012a3c75.SMD 07:17 03:40 SMTP-(0758F266) processing D:\IMail\spool\Q9c983a68012a3c75.SMD What am I missing? Thanks, K -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 1:25 PM To: Katherine Kennedy Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] how do i determine what account has been compromised? I have not found anything in the logs that indicate the account that is authenticating to send the spam You should see Authenticated $username, session treated as local. It also is helpful to run a script using a command-line POP3 client (I have used Getmail.exe) against all of your mailboxes to check for ($username == $password) or ($password == password) or ($password == other extremely obvious cases). You can't apply much intelligence, but you can catch obvious vulnerabilities. Be sure to use command-line options to avoid retrieving any actual mail! --Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SpamAssassin plugs into Declude! http://www.imprimia.com/products/software/freeutils/SPAMC32/download/re lease / Defuse Dictionary Attacks: Turn Exchange or IMail mailboxes into IMail Aliases! http://www.imprimia.com/products/software/freeutils/exchange2aliases/do wnloa d/release/ http://www.imprimia.com/products/software/freeutils/ldap2aliases/downlo ad/re lease/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail- archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail- archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] upgrading to 2006.2
Make sure you upgrade to 2006.21. The install is simple and will restart both Imail and IIS services for you. John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Doucette Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 1:36 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] upgrading to 2006.2 I'm a little nervous about upgrading IMail from 2006.1 to 2006.2 and want to make sure I do it correctly. I downloaded the upgrade and have read through the release notes and don't see any specific instructions for installing the upgrade. For example, do I need to shut down the IMail services currently running before running the install? Do I need to shut down the IIS services? If not, what happens if users try to access their email while I'm upgrading IMail? If any of you have done this upgrade and have suggestions, I would love to hear them. Thanks, ~Susan -- Susan Doucette Information Technology Santa Cruz City Schools 405 Old San Jose Rd. Soquel, CA 95073 831-429-3410 x212 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail- archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] upgrading to 2006.2
Oops, looks like it has not been publicly released yet as the documentation is being finalized. Wait a couple of days if you can. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Doucette Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 2:55 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] upgrading to 2006.2 There's a point. I went to the Ipswitch Download Upgrades web page and it only specifies 2006.2 - do I need to do something else to get 2006.21 or is that what I downloaded? Thanks ~Susan John T (lists) wrote: Make sure you upgrade to 2006.21. The install is simple and will restart both Imail and IIS services for you. John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Doucette Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 1:36 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] upgrading to 2006.2 I'm a little nervous about upgrading IMail from 2006.1 to 2006.2 and want to make sure I do it correctly. I downloaded the upgrade and have read through the release notes and don't see any specific instructions for installing the upgrade. For example, do I need to shut down the IMail services currently running before running the install? Do I need to shut down the IIS services? If not, what happens if users try to access their email while I'm upgrading IMail? If any of you have done this upgrade and have suggestions, I would love to hear them. Thanks, ~Susan -- Susan Doucette Information Technology Santa Cruz City Schools 405 Old San Jose Rd. Soquel, CA 95073 831-429-3410 x212 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail- archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ -- Susan Doucette Information Technology Santa Cruz City Schools 405 Old San Jose Rd. Soquel, CA 95073 831-429-3410 x212
RE: [IMail Forum] new login error
Known issue if you are redirecting: 3) The login.apsx now has code in it to clear authCookies(put there to fix a bug). Please do not redirect to login.aspx. If you must redirect, redirect to default.aspx. That way authenticated users will not be logged out. However redirection is unnecessary. This functionality is already built into the web client. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Foresman Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 6:16 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] new login error We can't reproduce this in the office but we're hearing from several customers about this: Unable to log in to the system. Reason: the return URL specified for request redirection is invalid. Thanks, Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850-656-2644
RE: [IMail Forum] Bogus Helo message
Since you are running Imail 8.15, this is a known problem and to fix you will need to upgrade. What is happening is that Imail is announcing itself with different names based upon the sender domain but from the same IP. Beginning with Imail 2006 (Imail 9) you can configure what helo is used. John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kathy Lees Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 2:06 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Bogus Helo message Yes, that is our main server IP. All of our domains are set up using a few different IP's and all the mail is set up on virtual servers. - Original Message - From: Rod Dorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 2:58 PM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Bogus Helo message On Tuesday, July 3, 2007, 16:33:05, Kathy Lees wrote: One of our clients got this message when she got some emails rejected from someone. How do I correct this? How can I see if it is a virus or if the server is configured incorrectly? Thank you for contacting Online Support. Your IP ( 64.7.207.173) has been blocked due to a bogus helo. ... Is 64.7.207.173 one of your mail servers IP addresses? If not then its not your problem. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] The avalanche has already started, it is too Rod Dorman late for the pebbles to vote. - Ambassador Kosh To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail- archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail- archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] question
Sounds purely like a MAC problem and if you look at one of those vaction messages it will show that it originated on the MAC client. John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Doucette Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 11:51 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] question Interesting thing happened today with my IMail 2006.1. One of my accounts uses a Mac OS X and, instead of setting a vacation message in his WebMessaging preferences, he set a Rule in the Mac Mail client. This apparently caused the mail server to respond to all the emails in his inbox and other folders on the Mac (some going back several months) with the vacation message. Is this a known bug? I don't mind telling my Mac users to use WebMessaging for this, but I'm wondering if there's something else I should know. Thanks, ~Susan -- Susan Doucette Information Technology Santa Cruz City Schools 405 Old San Jose Rd. Soquel, CA 95073 831-429-3410 x212 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail- archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 web messaging nightmare
Yes, when Imail 2006.2 was released and many started to use it, including installations on high volume or heavily used servers, the webmail bugs started to show themselves. As an example, I was running the preview for Imail 2006.2 on my server and had no errors or problems whatsoever. However my server is low volume. After its release, when I installed it on a high volume client server with users all over the place the problems arose. As of right now, Imail 2006.21 RC1 is installed on my server and on my client’s high volume server and so far no errors have been seen or reported. The preferences.config file is in each users file directory and is used by webmail to set how the user wants certain things. If it does not exist, that means the user has never changed anything from default and that is fine, although in some cases having a preferences.config file even if everything is default settings has helped. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Spaminator Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 12:25 PM To: imail_forum@list.ipswitch.com; Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 web messaging nightmare This is a HUGE problem. I have a client with 800 accounts saying they're going to leave the platform because they're constantly getting logged out. I can't actually reproduce the probem here and am having a hard time tracking down their browser settings because they're across the country. Are there any temporary workarounds? What's the preferences.config fix? What is the ETA on 2006.21? I know it's in RC1 status, but we need it FAST FAST FAST! I really think Ipswitch should start publishing a KNOWN ISSUES list with every release, and constantly keep it updated as things arise. Forget scaring off potential customers, they WANT to see this stuff. Be more concerned with taking care of the many customers you already have! I looked through the forums and boards before upgrading to this version, which was released on March 6th I think, before upgrading our system. I saw a reference here and there, but it didn't sound like the widespread revolt that I'm experiencing! Thanks, One bloody and bruised IT guy -Original Message- From: John T (lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent 6/18/2007 5:16:49 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 web messaging nightmare Bill, resolution of these problems and development of 2006.21 is almost complete. I and others have been testing with beta 3 (oops, meant preview 3) and so far things are looking to be fixed. The couple of issues I saw were either quickly resolved by simple code changes or by updating the preferences.config file or by having the user update their browser. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 12:33 PM To: 'Tripp Allen' Cc: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 web messaging nightmare Tripp, You have helped me in the past with web messaging issues and now that you are the product manager for Imail I am hoping you can once again fix a VERY big problem with web messaging. Many of our users are being logged out of web messaging when they send an email. I've waited a week for some solution from tech support/development with a final answer of downgrade to 2006.1 or await a new release. Neither of those are solutions because downgrading doesn't give me much confidence to upgrade and awaiting a new release will likely cost us business. I've searched the forums and we are not the only ones experiencing this problem and I hope that you can step in and get development to fix this ASAP. Thanks, Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting file:///\\www.matrosity.com www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644
RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 web messaging nightmare
Aprox 30K in/out per day, about 2K users on 125 domains, RC1 installed 2 AM this morning and no complaints from users as of yet and no significant problems seen in the logs. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grant Griffith Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 1:13 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 web messaging nightmare John, How long have you been running this version on the high volume server and what are you calling high volume? I really want to upgrade mine but was waiting on the released version. Thanks, Grant Griffith Web Application Developer Enhanced Telecommunications http://www.etczone.com 812-932-1000 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists) Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 4:02 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 web messaging nightmare Yes, when Imail 2006.2 was released and many started to use it, including installations on high volume or heavily used servers, the webmail bugs started to show themselves. As an example, I was running the preview for Imail 2006.2 on my server and had no errors or problems whatsoever. However my server is low volume. After its release, when I installed it on a high volume client server with users all over the place the problems arose. As of right now, Imail 2006.21 RC1 is installed on my server and on my client's high volume server and so far no errors have been seen or reported. The preferences.config file is in each users file directory and is used by webmail to set how the user wants certain things. If it does not exist, that means the user has never changed anything from default and that is fine, although in some cases having a preferences.config file even if everything is default settings has helped. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Spaminator Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 12:25 PM To: imail_forum@list.ipswitch.com; Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 web messaging nightmare This is a HUGE problem. I have a client with 800 accounts saying they're going to leave the platform because they're constantly getting logged out. I can't actually reproduce the probem here and am having a hard time tracking down their browser settings because they're across the country. Are there any temporary workarounds? What's the preferences.config fix? What is the ETA on 2006.21? I know it's in RC1 status, but we need it FAST FAST FAST! I really think Ipswitch should start publishing a KNOWN ISSUES list with every release, and constantly keep it updated as things arise. Forget scaring off potential customers, they WANT to see this stuff. Be more concerned with taking care of the many customers you already have! I looked through the forums and boards before upgrading to this version, which was released on March 6th I think, before upgrading our system. I saw a reference here and there, but it didn't sound like the widespread revolt that I'm experiencing! Thanks, One bloody and bruised IT guy -Original Message- From: John T (lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent 6/18/2007 5:16:49 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 web messaging nightmare Bill, resolution of these problems and development of 2006.21 is almost complete. I and others have been testing with beta 3 (oops, meant preview 3) and so far things are looking to be fixed. The couple of issues I saw were either quickly resolved by simple code changes or by updating the preferences.config file or by having the user update their browser. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 12:33 PM To: 'Tripp Allen' Cc: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 web messaging nightmare Tripp, You have helped me in the past with web messaging issues and now that you are the product manager for Imail I am hoping you can once again fix a VERY big problem with web messaging. Many of our users are being logged out of web messaging when they send an email. I've waited a week for some solution from tech support/development with a final answer of downgrade to 2006.1 or await a new release. Neither of those are solutions because downgrading doesn't give me much confidence to upgrade and awaiting a new release will likely cost us business. I've searched the forums and we are not the only ones experiencing this problem and I hope that you can step in and get development to fix this ASAP. Thanks, Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting file:///\\www.matrosity.com www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644
RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 web messaging nightmare
Bill, resolution of these problems and development of 2006.21 is almost complete. I and others have been testing with beta 3 (oops, meant preview 3) and so far things are looking to be fixed. The couple of issues I saw were either quickly resolved by simple code changes or by updating the preferences.config file or by having the user update their browser. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 12:33 PM To: 'Tripp Allen' Cc: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 web messaging nightmare Tripp, You have helped me in the past with web messaging issues and now that you are the product manager for Imail I am hoping you can once again fix a VERY big problem with web messaging. Many of our users are being logged out of web messaging when they send an email. I've waited a week for some solution from tech support/development with a final answer of downgrade to 2006.1 or await a new release. Neither of those are solutions because downgrading doesn't give me much confidence to upgrade and awaiting a new release will likely cost us business. I've searched the forums and we are not the only ones experiencing this problem and I hope that you can step in and get development to fix this ASAP. Thanks, Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting file:///\\www.matrosity.com www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644
RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 web messaging nightmare
In fact, Imail 2006.21 RC1 was just made available. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists) Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 3:17 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 web messaging nightmare Bill, resolution of these problems and development of 2006.21 is almost complete. I and others have been testing with beta 3 (oops, meant preview 3) and so far things are looking to be fixed. The couple of issues I saw were either quickly resolved by simple code changes or by updating the preferences.config file or by having the user update their browser. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 12:33 PM To: 'Tripp Allen' Cc: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 web messaging nightmare Tripp, You have helped me in the past with web messaging issues and now that you are the product manager for Imail I am hoping you can once again fix a VERY big problem with web messaging. Many of our users are being logged out of web messaging when they send an email. I've waited a week for some solution from tech support/development with a final answer of downgrade to 2006.1 or await a new release. Neither of those are solutions because downgrading doesn't give me much confidence to upgrade and awaiting a new release will likely cost us business. I've searched the forums and we are not the only ones experiencing this problem and I hope that you can step in and get development to fix this ASAP. Thanks, Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting file:///\\www.matrosity.com www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644
RE: [IMail Forum] IMAP Performance
If I remember correctly, someone reported this on the Imail web Forum and it was further stated that Outlook works fine so it may be an OE issue. I myself using Outlook 2007 checking 4 email accounts each with multiple folders on my 2006.2 server works fine. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Imail Admin Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 5:19 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] IMAP Performance Hi All, I was wondering if anyone had any thoughts on the performance of 2006.2 when used with IMAP and Outlook Express. We've been running a limited test of 2006.2 as a conversion from our old 7.15 server. Most of our clients use Outlook Express configured with IMAP, so that is our main concern. The one thing that I've noticed most is that 2006.2 is really slow to wake up. That is, if I go to a computer than I haven't used in a while (say, overnight) and then launch OE, I get a long delay (with hourglass) before getting a message that the server can't be reached. Click OK, then refresh, and OE works fine. Or, I can short-cut the entire process by hitting escape (during the hourglass wait), clicking on another folder besides InBox, wait a few seconds, then click back to InBox. Once you start actively using email, then there is no problem with performance. However, it's that slow start that concerns me. It has to be something about the way the server sets up the connection, and how quickly it responds. Any thoughts on this? Thanks, Ben BC Web
RE: Re[2]: AW: AW: [IMail Forum] Possible to get rid of 8383?
I always did like that show. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen Guluk Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 11:35 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: Re[2]: AW: AW: [IMail Forum] Possible to get rid of 8383? Bruce, You're really going to move to the mountains and get all Grizzly Adams on us? Regards, Steve Guluk SGDesign (949) 661-9333 ICQ: 7230769
RE: [IMail Forum] Slow web mail after upgrade
Hey Bill, if you run out of things to complain about let me know and I will let you have a couple of mine. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 1:22 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Slow web mail after upgrade webmail is slow to login messages do not display when clicked Usage meter doesn't work Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting file:///\\www.matrosity.com www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644
RE: [IMail Forum] Slow web mail after upgrade
OH, I didn't say it was necessarily with Imail. ;-0 John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 1:44 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Slow web mail after upgrade what's wrong with yours? Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists) Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 4:29 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Slow web mail after upgrade Hey Bill, if you run out of things to complain about let me know and I will let you have a couple of mine. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 1:22 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Slow web mail after upgrade webmail is slow to login messages do not display when clicked Usage meter doesn't work Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting file:///\\www.matrosity.com www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644
RE: [IMail Forum] deleting old messages in WebMail
Did you log back in immediantly, or after a few minutes? How big is the mail box? Large mail boxes will actually take a few minutes to be processed using that method. John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Doucette Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 3:58 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] deleting old messages in WebMail Running IMail server 2006.1. I'm getting ready to clean up old messages so I was testing the feature to delete messages older than XX days in IMail Admin. I did this on my test account which has messages going back a month. I specified deleting messages older than 15 days. It appeared to work - I didn't get any errors, but when I logged into the test account, it still has the messages going back a month. Is there something I'm missing? Thanks for any suggestions.. -- Susan Doucette Information Technology Santa Cruz City Schools 405 Old San Jose Rd. Soquel, CA 95073 831-429-3410 x212 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail- archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Alternative sign on page with 2006.2
Oh, but Matt, MACs are perfect, so what could you possibly mean? (Tongue planted firmly in cheek.) ;-) John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 1:59 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Alternative sign on page with 2006.2 Mike, I can certainly see the utility here. Like I said, we were both very tired at that point and incapable of doing any reverse engineering of code. The instructions that Mark gave worked great...except that this won't work with Safari. I was told that it barfs somewhere late in some of the AJAX stuff. What that does is make an ajax request to the login.aspx, saving the source in a string, updating the form data in the string with query param info, writing this updated login form to the page, then submitting that form. Safari seems to be tripping up in the second to last bit. I clearly is making the ajax request, I think its updating the code, and I think that's where it goes no further. This would take some time (with a Mac) to figure out but I did confirm that the login works with Firefox (2.0.0.4 but prob earlier versions too) on the mac. I am thinking about using your code in order to avoid that. Before we dig into it, do you have any idea if you code works with Safari browsers? Why the hell did Apple decide to create it's own browser based on code other than Mozilla anyway??? Thanks, Matt Mike N wrote: The other file is not designed to accept arguments. It presents an alternative by accepting a POSTed login username and password. The enteredUser and enteredPassword are substituted by the VBScript. It does require a tiny bit of VBScript understanding to adapt to your environment. The advantage is that the URL is not cached by the browser or proxies; particularly if not using SSL. - Original Message - From: Marc Rosamond mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 9:41 AM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Alternative sign on page with 2006.2 The other file which was provided by a user appears to work differently from what the article mentions. If you use that file, your username ends up being enteredUser and enteredPassword which of course will result in an invalid login message. It doesn't seem to support being able to pass the username and password via the querystring as the original 2006 file did so I am guessing the user who made it intended for you to hardcode your username and password in the enteredUser and enteredPassword locations.
RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 upgrade and slapd.exe errors
As for the webmail errors, that is well known and documented and currently under scrutiny for being fixed in 2006.21 which is in beta3 now. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Will Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 6:52 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 upgrade and slapd.exe errors I have been unable to resolve the slapd.exe issue I have been encountering. Likewise, I have been unable to stabilize the response times from open LDAP, which are interfering with my barracuda spam filter. I have been forced to abandon open LDAP completely and I have moved to using Active Directory instead. LDAP Init did not work for me. I have completely wiped the LDAP database on three occasions, but the response times remain poor. Active Directory is currently responding correctly and consistently from the same server, so I'm going to stick with that. Thanks to Sanford Whiteman for providing me a template for exporting my Imail aliases to active directory. I hope you do not mind that I modified your aliasestoldap script to export to AD instead of open LDAP. I am still trying to figure out why web messaging crashes or freezes so often. My only error indications are .NET 2.0 warnings in the event log: Event code: 3005 Event message: An unhandled exception has occurred. Event time: 5/30/2007 8:55:49 AM Event time (UTC): 5/30/2007 12:55:49 PM Event ID: eb3f3d8454df4280bdfb03a02641f02c Event sequence: 310 Event occurrence: 1 Event detail code: 0 Application information: Application domain: /LM/W3SVC/1/Root/IClient-1-128250028611562500 Trust level: Full Application Virtual Path: /IClient Application Path: E:\IMail\WebDir\WebClient\ Machine name: NCATS-MAIL Process information: Process ID: 2708 Process name: w3wp.exe Account name: NT AUTHORITY\NETWORK SERVICE Exception information: Exception type: HttpException Exception message: The remote host closed the connection. The error code is 0x80072746. Request information: Request URL: http://mail.ncats.net/IClient/DownLoad.aspx?MailboxName=INBOXSequenceNumber =460590408FileName=100_0889.jpgPartReference=2Encoding= Request path: /IClient/DownLoad.aspx User host address: 199.176.234.182 User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is authenticated: True Authentication Type: Forms Thread account name: NT AUTHORITY\NETWORK SERVICE Thread information: Thread ID: 1 Thread account name: NT AUTHORITY\NETWORK SERVICE Is impersonating: False Stack trace:at System.Web.Hosting.ISAPIWorkerRequestInProcForIIS6.FlushCore(Byte[] status, Byte[] header, Int32 keepConnected, Int32 totalBodySize, Int32 numBodyFragments, IntPtr[] bodyFragments, Int32[] bodyFragmentLengths, Int32 doneWithSession, Int32 finalStatus, Boolean async) at System.Web.Hosting.ISAPIWorkerRequest.FlushCachedResponse(Boolean isFinal) at System.Web.Hosting.ISAPIWorkerRequest.FlushResponse(Boolean finalFlush) at System.Web.HttpResponse.Flush(Boolean finalFlush) at System.Web.HttpResponse.Flush() at Ipswitch.Web.Client.DownLoad.Page_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e) at System.Web.Util.CalliHelper.EventArgFunctionCaller(IntPtr fp, Object o, Object t, EventArgs e) at System.Web.Util.CalliEventHandlerDelegateProxy.Callback(Object sender, EventArgs e) at System.Web.UI.Control.OnLoad(EventArgs e) at System.Web.UI.Control.LoadRecursive() at System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) Custom event details: For more information, see Help and Support Center at Will -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of kstan Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 9:18 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 upgrade and slapd.exe errors Hi, Yes, we have seen this issue. But Ipswitch answer was to try the Imail LDAP Init, but we are hesitate to do so, as it will wipe out all the users attributes such as department, phone number, address etc that we have entered Best Regards, Kstan Cohesion Network Technologies _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Will Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 8:47 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 upgrade and slapd.exe errors I upgraded to 2006.2 a few weeks ago. Since that time I often get windows application error stating that slapd.exe. Event id 1000 follows. Along with this persistent error I have been experiencing server crashes since the upgrade. The server cannot be pinged from the network. A reboot fixes the issue. I have a broadcom card in a dell server. This began occurring only after the upgrade and at the same time as the slapd.exe errors. I am running win2003, 3ghz, 1gb, with Imail
RE: [IMail Forum] White listing in Declude
1) It would be best to ask on the Declude forums. 2) White listing based upon from address is not a good idea. Ever hear of forged from addresses? 3) The from address of the below message as seen by Imail as it is part of the envelope is over 135 characters long. This is absurd. This proves once again that Yahoo is not as great as they think they are. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 12:06 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Whitelisting in Declude Hello all, I'm running ICS 2006 with Declude 3.1. I'm having difficulties trying to whitelist emails that come from Yahoo! Alerts. Our CEO has setup these alerts to email him articles based on certain keywords. It seems that these alert emails always get filtered out as Spam no matter what I try to whitelist. The IP address on the Received line seems to be different with each new email. I've tried whitelisting the following with out success: WHITELIST FROM [EMAIL PROTECTED] WHITELIST FROM Yahoo! Alerts [EMAIL PROTECTED] WHITELIST FROM [EMAIL PROTECTED] WHITELIST FROM [EMAIL PROTECTED] Any ideas would be appreciated! Below is an Internet Header from one of these emails: Received: from n2.bullet.scd.yahoo.com [66.218.66.38] by cottonwoodfinancial.com (SMTPD-9.10) id A91F041C; Fri, 25 May 2007 13:21:19 -0500 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=ginc1024; d=yahoo-inc.com; b=Iu+p8HIeDRYTVfxzZy46T4sUw7xxb8quyag3K9vQs4aaqcZraiL9+M7kUxvlX3JS5A0OUVyNqJ fdRQL2YfcGQiDpxLz9/3WTsVZ//bExBmYocNuFYq0mvpNaFb+6gN91a5A2+tfRdDqj5triYwEUdm 4g1IQ/baXqNWFmb+VhWps=; Received: from [209.73.164.83] by n2.bullet.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 May 2007 18:22:15 - Received: from [66.94.229.221] by t7.bullet.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 May 2007 18:22:15 - Received: from [127.0.0.1] by dlv6.alerts.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 May 2007 18:22:15 - X-yahoo-newman-property: alerts X-yahoo-newman-id: S0600435a0189- [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Yahoo! Alerts [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: **SPAM**=?UTF-8?B?S2V5d29yZCBOZXdzOiBbImNhc2ggYW1lcmljYSJd?= To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Yahoo! Alerts [EMAIL PROTECTED] Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Yahoo-AlertId:NcSwdrIxGXGwwkYHzHjRe8yO.LxrLKI- X-Yahoo-Alerts-Beta: YES Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 11:22:15 -0700 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-RBL-Warning: NOLEGITCONTENT: No content unique to legitimate E-mail detected. X-RBL-Warning: IPNOTINMX: X-RBL-Warning: MXRATE-ALLOW: GOOD SENDER X-RBL-Warning: MAILFROM: Domain returns.bulk.y has no MX or A records [0301]. X-RBL-Warning: SPAMHEADERS: This E-mail has headers consistent with spam [420e]. X-RBL-Warning: NONENGLISH: Non-English text found in E-mail. X-RBL-Warning: WEIGHT10: Weight of 29 reaches or exceeds the limit of 10. X-Declude-Sender: alerts.kmydmmbqgqztkyjqge4dslkjgv2e4msckndxovrykrkxonrvjm2u24tjkncgmmcuifqve 4txfu- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [66.218.66.38] X-Declude-Spoolname: D291f00ba6e87.smd X-Declude-Note: Scanned by Declude 3.1.3 (http://www.declude.com/x-note.htm) for spam. X-Declude-Scan: Score [29] at 13:21:34 on 25 May 2007 X-Declude-Tests: MXRATE-ALLOW, MAILFROM, SPAMHEADERS, NONENGLISH, WEIGHT10, WEIGHT14, WEIGHT16 X-Country-Chain: UNITED STATES-destination X-RCPT-TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status: X-UIDL: 480033265 X-IMail-ThreadID: 291f00ba6e87 Kevin Fenn Information Technology Department Cottonwood Financial, Ltd. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [IMail Forum] Yahoo bounces
Actually, I think we should all demand an IP address for each mail domain on our servers from ICANNA and explain that the reason is Yahoo wants each domain that it receives email from to have its very own dedicated IP address. Let's see how fast Yahoo changes their song. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Doherty Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 12:36 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Yahoo bounces That's a ridiculous position for Yahoo to take. I have about 300 mail domains. I'm supposed to burn 300 IPs on my mail server? Sheer insanity. -Dave Doherty Skywaves, Inc. 97 Webster Street Worcester, MA 01603 508-425-7176 - Original Message - From: Imail mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2007 11:47 PM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Yahoo bounces I found this response on a forum someplace about the same problem. Yahoo apparently responded. I do not know if this is accurate or not but I do know that those clients of ours that have their own IP are not having problems, yet. I have read of individual companies having the same problem using Exchange but cannot verify their email configurations to tell why. Thank you for writing to Yahoo! Mail. We cannot systematically exempt your mailings from our SpamGuard technology since the IP address of the server appears to be a shared domain mail host and have multiple clients sending email. We will maintain the current information in our database as it is configured. This allows delivery of your mailings to oscillate between the Inbox and the Bulk Mail folder as Yahoo! users choose. Please keep in mind that our SpamGuard technology will continually monitor user feedback pertaining to emails coming from your mail server(s), and as such, the user feedback we receive will be one of the factors that influence where your emails are most appropriately delivered. Our studies have indicated that when users see messages incorrectly categorized, they notify us within hours of delivery. We do recommend that if you maintain several clients or company lists (especially for an ISP/ASP/ESP) to segregate your clients to different IP addresses. This ensures that users are marking each company on its own merits. User notifications to us may become hazy should they see both spam and legitimate mail from the same IP. In cases like these, the end result will likely be that spam will override the legitimate mail. If you implement significant changes to your mailing practices, feel free to contact us again. You may refer to the Help page below for some information and general guidelines that we have found to be effective in maintaining good mailing lists: At 09:21 PM 5/20/2007, you wrote: Sounds like Yahoo is graylisting. -Dave Doherty Skywaves, Inc. 97 Webster Street Worcester, MA 01603 508-425-7176 - Original Message - From: Krishna mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2007 9:52 PM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Yahoo bounces I had the same problem few months back, Yahoo server treats all emails as spam and rejects the emails however if the same email is being resent then it goes through so make sure in your email server you set to re-try for 20 to 30 times. After i did this all yahoo emails are going trhough. Regards Krishna - Original Message - From: Jeff Hitchcock mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 10:33 PM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Yahoo bounces Seeing the same thing. Endless problems with Yahoo. Their tech support has been less than helpful. Jeff Hitchcock - [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Imail Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 4:25 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Yahoo bounces I've been getting this from email going to Yahoo accounts for the last 3 weeks or so. 421 Message from (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) temporarily deferred - 4.16.50. Please refer to http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/mail/defer/defer-06.html Some of the email that's going to them ends up in the Bulk folder and some just doesn't make it at all. I get this from dnsreport.com Mail FAIL Connect to mail servers ERROR: I could not complete a connection to one or more of your mailservers: ERROR: c.mx.mail.yahoo.com Greeting indicates server is down: 421 Message from (66.36.241.109) temporarily deferred - 4.16.50. Please refer to http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/mail/defer/defer-06.html . ERROR: f.mx.mail.yahoo.com Greeting indicates server is down: 421 Message from (66.36.241.109) temporarily deferred - 4.16.50. Please refer to http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/mail/defer/defer-06.html . ERROR: g.mx.mail.yahoo.com Greeting indicates server is down: 421 Message from (66.36.241.109)
RE: [IMail Forum] IMail 2006.21 - HTML not readable on PALM OS
And for whoever it was that complained about rich text postings here, if somebody is posting from the webmail client, it's html-only unless you remember to pull down the message options and set the message to text- only each time. You can't set that as a default preference, only a per- message basis. This should be a domain and user-level preference, with the user default propagated down from the domain-level settings. It can be set to default to plain text in the user preferences. John T To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] IMail 2006.21 - HTML not readable on PALM OS
Woops, yes I should have stated that this is on 2006.2. John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Doherty Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2007 10:43 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] IMail 2006.21 - HTML not readable on PALM OS Hi John- Still running 2006.1 here. Is that new in 2006.2? -d - Original Message - From: John T (lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2007 1:37 PM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] IMail 2006.21 - HTML not readable on PALM OS And for whoever it was that complained about rich text postings here, if somebody is posting from the webmail client, it's html-only unless you remember to pull down the message options and set the message to text- only each time. You can't set that as a default preference, only a per- message basis. This should be a domain and user-level preference, with the user default propagated down from the domain-level settings. It can be set to default to plain text in the user preferences. John T To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail- archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail- archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] SQL or not to SQL
Troy, from my understanding, the performance advantage of SQL is only over using an MS Access database when you have a large number of accounts. Imail registry is the fastest. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Troy D. Hilton Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 1:16 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] SQL or not to SQL We use a SQL database for our users; however we also use WS_FTP Server to authenticate against the same database. The only real life advantage I've found is the ability to lookup a user's password instead of having to recreate it. I once heard that there was a performance advantage to SQL but you'd have to have way more accounts than 500 to really see it, IIRC. Troy D. Hilton Serveon, Inc. 302-529-8640 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bonno Bloksma Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 3:41 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] SQL or not to SQL Hi, The only reason to use a SQL database is when one wants to have the user data for other purposes as well. If one has a client database in SQL that is being used for other purposes like finance it might be advantageous to have IMail use the SQL database. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://www.tio.nl www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Dale McDiarmid mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 9:04 PM Subject: [IMail Forum] SQL or not to SQL Hi... I'll be building a new server small corporate mail server with less than 500 users and a few lists. I'll allow POP and web access. Is it an advantage to go SQL or would the iMail default be fine. I've been running on default for over 10 years without issues. If we did go SQL I'd prefer Oracle, but would consider MS SQL Server or mySQL (if it's an option). Also, would SQL hamper or improve recovery? Any suggestions? Thx, D. To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] opening mail error
This is the problems that are known and being worked on. Ipswitch is in the middle of betas and working on the fix and it is looking very promising. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bonno Bloksma Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 8:18 AM To: IMail_Forum Subject: [IMail Forum] opening mail error Hi, We are running IMail 2006.2 and some people have problems reading the mail. What they tell me is that they can log in, can see the mail list but when they try to open a mail they end up at the login page. This problem started a few weeks ago it seems. Most people have no problems at all, some do. Anybody recognise this? Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://www.tio.nl www.tio.nl
RE: [IMail Forum] IMail 2006.21 - HTML not readable on PALM OS
Please note: There is no such thing as a released Imail 2006.21. It is still in beta. Per instructions from Ipswitch, if you are going to participate in the beta (Technical Preview) of 2006.21, you are to post any and all issues with said beta (technical preview) on the Imail forum specifically setup for that. John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Catuogno Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 2:40 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] IMail 2006.21 - HTML not readable on PALM OS I logged into a server running the new release and sent an HTML e-mail to someone using a Palm Treo - they still only got the subject, the body was blank. Guess this isn't fixed. I'm very disappointed. To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail- archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] Disk Cache Sub-directory error
Is your Imail server also a DC? It is indeed has something have something to do with IIS. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Foresman Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 7:40 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Disk Cache Sub-directory error Thanks Daniel but since this only exists on our imail server I don't believe it to be an IIS issue. I'm hoping ipswitch will chime in and tell me why this is happening or if its fixed in 2006.2x Regards, Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850-656-2644 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Donnelly Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 10:34 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Disk Cache Sub-directory error Bill, Looks like an MS error and a search of MS gave me this: http://search.microsoft.com/results.aspx?q=%22Template+Persistent+Cache%22 http://search.microsoft.com/results.aspx?q=%22Template+Persistent+Cache%22; qsc0=0SearchBtn0=SearchFORM=QBME1l=1mkt=en-USPageType=99 qsc0=0SearchBtn0=SearchFORM=QBME1l=1mkt=en-USPageType=99 Daniel Donnelly -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill Foresman Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 8:41 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Disk Cache Sub-directory error I'm seeing the following error in the application log for the imail server: Error: The Template Persistent Cache initialization failed for Application Pool 'IAdmin' because of the following error: Could not create a Disk Cache Sub-directory for the Application Pool. The data may have additional error codes.. Any idea how to correct this? Thanks, Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850-656-2644 attachment: winmail.dat
RE: [IMail Forum] Disk Cache Sub-directory error
Then your rejection of Daniels post seems to be premature since it appears to fit to a T. QUOTE CAUSE This issue may occur if the server that is running Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 6.0 is also a domain controller. The problem occurs because the Application pool is using the NT Authority\Network Service account, and the NT Authority\Network Service account may not have permissions to access the required folders. CLOSE QUOTE Please then explain why your problem does not fit into that cause. The above quote taken from http://support.microsoft.com/kb/842493. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 6:01 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Disk Cache Sub-directory error yes Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists) Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 12:46 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Disk Cache Sub-directory error Is your Imail server also a DC? It is indeed has something have something to do with IIS. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Foresman Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 7:40 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Disk Cache Sub-directory error Thanks Daniel but since this only exists on our imail server I don't believe it to be an IIS issue. I'm hoping ipswitch will chime in and tell me why this is happening or if its fixed in 2006.2x Regards, Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850-656-2644 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Donnelly Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 10:34 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Disk Cache Sub-directory error Bill, Looks like an MS error and a search of MS gave me this: http://search.microsoft.com/results.aspx?q=%22Template+Persistent+Cache%22 http://search.microsoft.com/results.aspx?q=%22Template+Persistent+Cache%22; qsc0=0SearchBtn0=SearchFORM=QBME1l=1mkt=en-USPageType=99 qsc0=0SearchBtn0=SearchFORM=QBME1l=1mkt=en-USPageType=99 Daniel Donnelly -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill Foresman Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 8:41 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Disk Cache Sub-directory error I'm seeing the following error in the application log for the imail server: Error: The Template Persistent Cache initialization failed for Application Pool 'IAdmin' because of the following error: Could not create a Disk Cache Sub-directory for the Application Pool. The data may have additional error codes.. Any idea how to correct this? Thanks, Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850-656-2644 attachment: winmail.dat text/html; charset=us-ascii: Unrecognized
RE: [IMail Forum] backup mx
So you do not think you need to follow the instructions in the KB you posted? Where is the bouncing occurring? John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Foresman Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 9:55 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] backup mx This still isn’t working as email is bouncing. I’ve added our server as secondary MX and added them to the host file. They’re not sending email through our server so I don’t think I need to relay anything for them? Regards, Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850-656-2644 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Doherty Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 11:54 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] backup mx Hi Bill- Add the IP address in SMTP Relay-for and stop/start the SMTP service. Add the client's server to your HOSTS file, and that should do it. Unless you have a list of valid users, aliases, and lists maintained by the client's server, don't enter the domain into the IMail control panel. If you do have that info, be sure that everything is aliased to mail.customerdomain.com and that you also have mail.customerdomain.com in your hosts file pointing to the correct IP address. -Dave Doherty Skywaves, Inc. 97 Webster Street Worcester, MA 01603 508-425-7176 - Original Message - From: Bill Foresman mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 10:21 AM Subject: [IMail Forum] backup mx I read through the KB article about being a backup mail server for someone and it doesn’t appear to be working as email is bouncing due to their server being down. http://www.ipswitch.com/Support/ICS/guides/IMailServer/8_2/IMailUGHTML/Chapter%202%20config15.html#16443 It looks pretty straight forward but I must be missing something. Are there other things that need to be done for this to work? Thanks, Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850-656-2644
RE: [IMail Forum] Max numbers of Alias Mail-Domains
255 total characters including spaces. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Schaible Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 1:28 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Max numbers of Alias Mail-Domains Hi to all, I remember, that the number of alias Mail-domains is limited, but i coun't find the matching kb article. So far i remember the limit is given by the maximum length of the registry key. Does anybody remember, what length is supported? Mit freundlichen Grüssen --- Merlin Consulting | Martin Schaible Bahnhofstrasse 27 | CH-8702 Zollikon | Switzerland Tel.: +41 44 391 30 00 | Fax: +41 44 391 32 49 Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.merlinconsulting.ch Support: support.merlinconsulting.ch GPS: N47 20.235 E8 34.226 --- News - Unsere Produkte: .:. Ipswitch Premium Partner .:. mxGuard/InvURIBL/MessageSniffer Antispam Lösung für IMail .:. Brainware Columbus Software Management .:. delight software GmbH .:. NewAtlanta BlueDragon .:. JMuffin CMS .:. NOD32 Antivirus System .:. Kiwi Syslog Monitor .:. Lockstep Systems - Backup Software .:. Paessler Network Monitoring .:. SmarterTools ---
RE: [IMail Forum] trailer.txt
But when talking about computers, the order is 2 20 200 2006 2006.03 2006.04 2006.1 2006.2 2006.201 2006.21 2006.211 2006.2111 John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bonno Bloksma Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 11:55 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] trailer.txt HiTripp, Can you guys please adhere to standard major minor version notation? We in this community know that when you talk about 2006.21 you actually mean 2006.2.1 just like 2006.04 was 2006.0.4 and preceded 2006.1 But most people wont understand and will asume a natural version order is: 2006 2006.1 2006.2 2006.03 (and assume the extra 0 is just to get it at two digits) 2006.04 2006.21 Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://www.tio.nl www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Tripp Allen mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 12:59 PM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] trailer.txt We have fixed the insertion of the trailer.txt for 2006.21 which should be going into technical preview (beta) very soon. It is not configurable to the point that it will be ignored for certain lists. Tripp - Original Message - From: Stefan Paege [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 3:03 AM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] trailer.txt Hi, can someone from Ipswitch please tell me if (and when) the two issues are corrected? Especially #2 is a big problem for us. Trailer.txt is added even if the list itself has its own Trailer message defined. Thanks in Germany we are now forced by law to add certain company information to every business mail. Easy I thought, just use a trailer.txt file which includes that info. Two problems, though. 1.) It does not work for HTML-Mail. While we have the policy that all outgoing mail must be in plain text some users are still using HTML by accident/on purpose. 2.) We have some lists setup where the trailer.txt file should NOT be added. -- Elektronik-Labor Carls GmbH Co. KG Stefan Paege Fon: +49 5973 9497-23 Fax: +49 5973 9497-19 Elektronik-Labor Carls GmbH Co. KG Kommanditgesellschaft:Sitz Neuenkirchen, Registergericht Steinfurt HRA 3310 Persönlich haftende Gesellschafterin: Elektronik-Labor Carls, Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH, Sitz Neuenkirchen, Registergericht Steinfurt HRB 4175 Geschäftsführer: Irmgard Carls, Joachim Schulte To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] trailer.txt
The click-generation. Good one, I like it. I may not have been in IT for as long as others, but I still remember my Tandy 8086 with an added Zucherboard for 256K of memory. Of course the one before that, I think it was an Atari, used an audio cassette recorder for data storage. (No such thing as stereo sound back then.) ;-) John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bonno Bloksma Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 12:30 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] trailer.txt Hi John, You and I know that, but then again WE've been around the block a few times in this world. :-) Most new sysops of the click-generation are less savy. Also, if we're going that way, why the dot between 2006 and the rest of the number. ;-) Wohever... 2006.21 could be a normal version number. What will Ipswitch do later this year when after all the updates we DO get to the two digit minor version number. Will 2006.10 realy be minor version 10 or just good old 1.0 ;-) Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://www.tio.nl/ www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: John T (lists) mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 9:14 AM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] trailer.txt But when talking about computers, the order is 2 20 200 2006 2006.03 2006.04 2006.1 2006.2 2006.201 2006.21 2006.211 2006.2111 John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bonno Bloksma Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 11:55 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] trailer.txt HiTripp, Can you guys please adhere to standard major minor version notation? We in this community know that when you talk about 2006.21 you actually mean 2006.2.1 just like 2006.04 was 2006.0.4 and preceded 2006.1 But most people wont understand and will asume a natural version order is: 2006 2006.1 2006.2 2006.03 (and assume the extra 0 is just to get it at two digits) 2006.04 2006.21 Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://www.tio.nl www.tio.nl - Original Message - From: Tripp Allen mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 12:59 PM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] trailer.txt We have fixed the insertion of the trailer.txt for 2006.21 which should be going into technical preview (beta) very soon. It is not configurable to the point that it will be ignored for certain lists. Tripp - Original Message - From: Stefan Paege [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 3:03 AM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] trailer.txt Hi, can someone from Ipswitch please tell me if (and when) the two issues are corrected? Especially #2 is a big problem for us. Trailer.txt is added even if the list itself has its own Trailer message defined. Thanks in Germany we are now forced by law to add certain company information to every business mail. Easy I thought, just use a trailer.txt file which includes that info. Two problems, though. 1.) It does not work for HTML-Mail. While we have the policy that all outgoing mail must be in plain text some users are still using HTML by accident/on purpose. 2.) We have some lists setup where the trailer.txt file should NOT be added. -- Elektronik-Labor Carls GmbH Co. KG Stefan Paege Fon: +49 5973 9497-23 Fax: +49 5973 9497-19 Elektronik-Labor Carls GmbH Co. KG Kommanditgesellschaft:Sitz Neuenkirchen, Registergericht Steinfurt HRA 3310 Persönlich haftende Gesellschafterin: Elektronik-Labor Carls, Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH, Sitz Neuenkirchen, Registergericht Steinfurt HRB 4175 Geschäftsführer: Irmgard Carls, Joachim Schulte To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] IMail 2006.21 Technical Preview Program
Eric, the problems you saw with Webmail on 2006.2 are probably related to the fixes in 2006.21. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Coffman Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 9:26 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] IMail 2006.21 Technical Preview Program Do you know if there will be a patch for 2006.1 that fixes this issue? My users hated 2006.2 and how horribly slow it is over dialup. I reverted back to 2006.1 due to the 4 times per day crashes (and now only have 1 or 2 crashes per day with 2006.1). After reverting back to 2006.1 I received calls and emails from 24 of my 1500 users thanking me for removing the 2006.2 interface. So my question is, is there a way to make 2006.1 stable? Sure I called support, 7 times. But in 2 months, despite all the data I sent, I have yet to receive any callbacks or emails with the status of my ticket. Its like Ipswitch support is a black hole. Eric Tripp Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/10/2007 9:52 AM You are invited to participate in the IMail 2006.21 Technical Preview Program! The IMail Development Team has been hard at work on the latest release of IMail. This release includes many exciting new features that have been requested from our user base. The Technical Preview Program allows users to interact directly with the IMail development team to experience and perfect new features and functionality within the software. If you're enthusiastic about working with new technologies, new product features, and the latest versions of our applications, then we have some really exciting things to show you! Highlights of What's New in IMail Server 2006.21 * Removed a handle leak in the web client which was causing web client failures on high use servers. * Updated the Premium Antispam engine. The latest version provides new options for configuring spam filtering of message header content as well as handling options for messages identified as coming from a Dirty IP. * Administrator: Added the ability to hide Active Directory (Built-in) users from IMail Server. * Administrator: In the Antispam white list, added wild card support for trusted addresses. * Administrator: Fixed an error that caused content filtering for authenticated users to override the whitelist. * SMTPD: Fixed an error that caused multiple message ID headers to be inserted into the message. * Queue Manager: When sending mail, if a valid 1xx or 2xx response is not received when connecting, the Queue Manager will roll to the next MX record. * Web Mail: Added the display of mailbox sizes. Click the Email icon in the left pane to view a list of the mailboxes and their sizes. * Fixed an error in handling the trailer.txt message. If you use the trailer.txt message, it is now appended to messages sent in all supported message formats. including: HTML, MIME , Base64, MIME Quoted Printable, MIME with no encoding, and UUencode. * Web Mail: Fixed an error in handling of inline images that have a filename associated. Such images are now shown inline. * Web Mail: Fixed an error with loading the WorkGroupShare database that prevented display of the folder tree and prevented use of the Compose function. * Web Mail: Fixed an error that allowed a previous user session to be displayed if the user exits Web Mail without clicking Log Out. * Web Mail: Now updates the lastlogin field when a user logs in. View the full release notes here: http://preview.ipswitch.com/preview/messaging/2006.21/IMail_RelNotes.htm http://preview.ipswitch.com/preview/messaging/2006.21/IMail_RelNotes.htm Technical Preview Program Forum: Please post any questions or issues that you have to the IMail 2006.21 Technical Preview Program Forum here: http://www.ipswitch.com/forums/messages.aspx?ForumID=34 Download IMail 2006.21 Preview 01: http://preview.ipswitch.com/preview/messaging/IMail-2006.21-Preview01.exe http://preview.ipswitch.com/preview/messaging/IMail-2006.21-Preview01.exe
RE: [IMail Forum] One domain, two email servers.
Although my question isn't Imail specific, I thought this would be the best place to ask. My company wants to get an exchange server to go with our Imail server. Mainly due to the higher ups wanting to use all that Outlook does. Is it possible to get our two email servers using the same domain name, and yet, have two sets of users? The exchange server would house the higher ups, and the imail for us lowly common folk. Or do I have to create a new domain for the exchange server? It is absolutely possible, look for posts from Sanford and his signature, exchange2aliases. What you have to decide is how incoming and outgoing email will flow. If everyone is going to have [EMAIL PROTECTED] email address and if all incoming and outgoing goes through Imail, it is very simple. John T To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] IIS Errors since upgrade to 2006.2
Travis, I am on the run right now, but if you look at posts from me on the web forum you will see information about this. I may have posted it here as well but I do not remember right now. It would have been about a month ago. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 7:38 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] IIS Errors since upgrade to 2006.2 All, I have had two errors that repeat themselves over time since my upgrade to 2006.2, but I had ignored them until now. Maybe a few times a day I get this pop-up saying the following: IIS Worker Process encountered a problem and needed to close. While in the Event Logs I get: A process serving application pool 'DefaultAppPool' exceeded time limits during shut down. The process id was '7808'. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.; Does anyone have any ideas on how to fix this? The only sites I have on this server are for Imail. I just went through the page in the manual laying out the IIS 6 (Windows Server 2003) setup and things look to be ok on the setup side of things. Thanks! Travis Additionally. 1. What should be the value for Recycle Worker Processes (in minutes) for the DefaultApplication Pool? Mine presently is set to 1740. I am not even sure what the significance of that number is, but I see 120 on some KB articles which would make my setting 27 hours to large. 2. What should be the value for Recycle Worker Process (number of requests) for the DefaultApplication Pool? Mine is not set presently.
RE: [IMail Forum] IIS Errors since upgrade to 2006.2
Travis, it is related to the handle leak and you want to look at what I have done. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 9:26 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] IIS Errors since upgrade to 2006.2 I will search the forums then - the only thing I saw that might relate to this is that there is a bug in the 2006.2 code regarding a Handle Leak. That was about it. I will search the forums on the error and see what I find. Thanks, Travis _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists) Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 9:16 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] IIS Errors since upgrade to 2006.2 Travis, I am on the run right now, but if you look at posts from me on the web forum you will see information about this. I may have posted it here as well but I do not remember right now. It would have been about a month ago. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 7:38 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] IIS Errors since upgrade to 2006.2 All, I have had two errors that repeat themselves over time since my upgrade to 2006.2, but I had ignored them until now. Maybe a few times a day I get this pop-up saying the following: IIS Worker Process encountered a problem and needed to close. While in the Event Logs I get: A process serving application pool 'DefaultAppPool' exceeded time limits during shut down. The process id was '7808'. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.; Does anyone have any ideas on how to fix this? The only sites I have on this server are for Imail. I just went through the page in the manual laying out the IIS 6 (Windows Server 2003) setup and things look to be ok on the setup side of things. Thanks! Travis Additionally. 1. What should be the value for Recycle Worker Processes (in minutes) for the DefaultApplication Pool? Mine presently is set to 1740. I am not even sure what the significance of that number is, but I see 120 on some KB articles which would make my setting 27 hours to large. 2. What should be the value for Recycle Worker Process (number of requests) for the DefaultApplication Pool? Mine is not set presently.
RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 Web Client and SMTP Proxy
Yes, in Imail 2006.2 email sent from Webmail is received by the Imail SMTPD32 service which will then pass it to a 3rd party app such as ASSP or Declude for processing. In earlier versions, Webmail dropped the email into the spool and the SMTPD32 service had nothing to do with it, it was sent using the Queue Manager. John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jimm Wetherbee Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 9:33 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 Web Client and SMTP Proxy We're using IMail (8.2) with ASSP. We have been happy with the combination but have noticed that the web client appears to bypass the ASSP proxy when sending mail. This would not be a problem, save that it means that our users are not able to whitelist these addresses automatically. I didn't see anything in the Knowledge Base that might help (though I may have well missed something) but am wondering (a) whether one can force the webclient to send to ASSP rather than directly to SMTP and whether the web client on 2006.2 behaves the same way. TIA --jimm To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail- archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 Web Client and SMTP Proxy
Please explain exactly how ASSP works? Declude, MXGaurd and I am sure there are some others work perfectly fine with the current version. If what you said is true, ASSP sounds more like a incoming gateway rather than a actual product that works with Imail via the 3rd party hand off in the SMTPD32 service. John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Traylor Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 12:44 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.2 Web Client and SMTP Proxy We're using IMail (8.2) with ASSP. We have been happy with the combination but have noticed that the web client appears to bypass the ASSP proxy when sending mail. This would not be a problem, save that it means that our users are not able to whitelist these addresses automatically. I didn't see anything in the Knowledge Base that might help (though I may have well missed something) but am wondering (a) whether one can force the webclient to send to ASSP rather than directly to SMTP and whether the web client on 2006.2 behaves the same way. You are probably configured to use DNS to deliver from Imail; Client=ASSP listen port=Imail=Internet So when the clients use the webmail they bypass ASSP. This has been a problem with this configuration with all versions of Imail, including the recent version. You need to add an SMTP service for delivery and use it from ASSP and have Imail deliver through a gateway, ASSP. Client=Imail (web or SMTP)=ASSP relay port=ASSP relay host=MS SMTP (set up for outgoing delivery only and no access to it from the Internet)=Internet You can also use the free hMailserver for the delivery service but I prefer to use it as an incoming SMTP AV gateway. Doug To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail- archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
