RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 to 2006.2 upgrade

[Kevin Gillis]

Hi Mike N,
 
Agreed.
 
we've been working on patch that we plan to release in the next day or so
and which we'll roll into the next release as well.
 
bye for now,
 
kg

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike N
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 12:23
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 to 2006.2 upgrade


Wow!  No emergency hotfix?   What if you have 500 domains to disable the
full mailbox notification and 20,000 users randomly losing passwords?

- Original Message - 
From: Mauro  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Lanci 
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 11:59 AM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 to 2006.2 upgrade

Hi Will,
 
I have tried to upgrade from version 2006.1 to 2006.2 with SQL but it fails
as variuos email passwords are deleted once the client try to login and
following is the reply from IPSwitch:
There is a know defect in the way that has a problem with using SQL as an
external database in version 9.2.  It is being addresses in the next
release. You will have to disable the full mailbox notification for each
domain.

Bye
Mauro

 

RE: [IMail Forum] Administration in Imail 2006.2

[Kevin Gillis]

Hi all,

This is correct but... 

We are looking to start a Technical Preview Program this month with a faster
and more feature rich Iadmin console (non web based).  One of the nice new
features is remoting... Ability to securely and remotely log into an imail
server with the new admin (non browser) thereby giving you the flexibility
and speed of a console but the remote/secure mgt of a browser.

Bye for now,

kg 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of florida.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 09:03
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Administration in Imail 2006.2

It has been gone since 2006.1




 Hi
 
 We have just upgraded from 8.22 to 2006.2 and it seems to have gone 
 OK.  New web interface is a big improvement and the web admin is 
 _much_ better.  One question I have is that it seems the non-web based 
 admin has gone.  Is this the case?
 
 Thanks
 
 ___
 Diarmaid Mac Aonghusa
 Fusio.net
 
 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
 List Archive: 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
 Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
 
 

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] Administration in Imail 2006.2

[Kevin Gillis]

Hello Vincent,

Yes, there will be a forum dedicated to this to provide feedback and
support.  We're looking to add other features like bulk changes to multiple
users and the ability to add or delete users to/from multiple lists at once
- the more feedback we get the better.

Bye for now,

kg 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vincent Toussaint
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 09:52
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Administration in Imail 2006.2

Great!!  This is good news.
Will you post the info to this list?

Thanks!
--
Vincent Toussaint
Sys. Admin
Hybride (www.hybride.com)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Gillis
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 9:41 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Administration in Imail 2006.2

Hi all,

This is correct but... 

We are looking to start a Technical Preview Program this month with a faster
and more feature rich Iadmin console (non web based).  One of the nice new
features is remoting... Ability to securely and remotely log into an imail
server with the new admin (non browser) thereby giving you the flexibility
and speed of a console but the remote/secure mgt of a browser.

Bye for now,

kg 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of florida.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 09:03
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Administration in Imail 2006.2

It has been gone since 2006.1




 Hi
 
 We have just upgraded from 8.22 to 2006.2 and it seems to have gone 
 OK.  New web interface is a big improvement and the web admin is 
 _much_ better.  One question I have is that it seems the non-web based

 admin has gone.  Is this the case?
 
 Thanks
 
 ___
 Diarmaid Mac Aonghusa
 Fusio.net
 
 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
 List Archive: 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
 Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
 
 

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/



To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: SPAM-WARN:[IMail Forum] 8.22 virtual domain checks

[Kevin Gillis]

Hi Darin,
 
Good and fair comments.
 
We will look into this further - it's clearly not desirable to have to
restart a service (impacting all currently running domains/vdomains)
resulting in a service impacting, scheduled outage.
 
Bye for now,
 
kg

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 06:35
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN:[IMail Forum] 8.22 virtual domain checks


I agree.  Kevin, this is a bug that should be fixed.  Requiring a restart of
services because of a change for a single customer takes mail services
offline for all customers.  Since many customers call at the first error, it
also means we get a number of phone calls due to the interruption of
service, even if only for a minute or two.
 
Is this also the case in 2006?  If so, please get this fixed in both 8.22
and 2006.

Darin.
 
 
- Original Message - 
From: Michael Thomas -  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mathbox 
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 6:50 PM
Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN:[IMail Forum] 8.22 virtual domain checks

Kevin,
 
=
From what we can tell, adding domains and aliases first started requiring a
service restart when the new SMTPD first shipped with IMail 8.20. You have
to restart SMTPD and the Queue Manager for the changes to take.
=
 
That seems like a very flippant response. Are we suppose to just shrug that
off? Do you have any idea how many Control Panels that broke? It certainly
broke mine! Could I fix that? Yes, I could. Then the mail server disappears
from the internet every time we add or delete a domain or an alias.
 
Was this change ANNOUNCED?
 
This is a real step backwards. If I had to stop and restart my web servers
every time I added or deleted a web site, my customers would LOVE that.
 
Just sign me out as:
 
Disgusted,

Michael Thomas
Mathbox
978-683-6718
1-877-MATHBOX (Toll Free)
  

 



  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Gillis
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 6:16 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN:[IMail Forum] 8.22 virtual domain checks


Hi Darin,
 
From what we can tell, adding domains and aliases first started requiring a
service restart when the new SMTPD first shipped with IMail 8.20. You have
to restart SMTPD and the Queue Manager for the changes to take.
 
Hope this helps.
 
bye for now,
 
kg
 
  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 16:38
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN:[IMail Forum] 8.22 virtual domain checks


Anyone from Ipswitch on here?

Darin.
 
 
- Original Message - 
From: Darin Cox mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 11:20 PM
Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN:[IMail Forum] 8.22 virtual domain checks

Hmmm... good to know.  Is Ipswitch working on a fix for this problem?  Any
idea as to whether 2006 is similarly afflicted?

Darin.
 
 
- Original Message - 
From: Michael Thomas -  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mathbox 
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 9:51 PM
Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN:[IMail Forum] 8.22 virtual domain checks

Darin,
 
The original 8.22 did not have this issue. The vulnerability patch released
on/or about 11/7/2006 has that issue.

Michael Thomas
Mathbox
978-683-6718
1-877-MATHBOX (Toll Free)
  

 


  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 9:22 PM
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: SPAM-WARN:[IMail Forum] 8.22 virtual domain checks


Has anyone noticed with IMail 8.22 having to restart SMTP and/or Queue
Manager after the addition or deletion of virtual domains and domain
aliases?
 
This was not required with 8.15, but with 8.22 I've noticed specific cases
of having to restart services for IMail to recognize virtual domain aliases
or deletion of a virtual domain.
 
Do similar problems exist in 2006?  Having to restart services for changes
like this is extremely undesirable.


Darin.
 
 

RE: SPAM-WARN:[IMail Forum] 8.22 virtual domain checks

[Kevin Gillis]

Hi Darin,
 
From what we can tell, adding domains and aliases first started requiring a
service restart when the new SMTPD first shipped with IMail 8.20. You have
to restart SMTPD and the Queue Manager for the changes to take.
 
Hope this helps.
 
bye for now,
 
kg
 
  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 16:38
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN:[IMail Forum] 8.22 virtual domain checks


Anyone from Ipswitch on here?

Darin.
 
 
- Original Message - 
From: Darin Cox mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 11:20 PM
Subject: Re: SPAM-WARN:[IMail Forum] 8.22 virtual domain checks

Hmmm... good to know.  Is Ipswitch working on a fix for this problem?  Any
idea as to whether 2006 is similarly afflicted?

Darin.
 
 
- Original Message - 
From: Michael Thomas -  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mathbox 
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 9:51 PM
Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN:[IMail Forum] 8.22 virtual domain checks

Darin,
 
The original 8.22 did not have this issue. The vulnerability patch released
on/or about 11/7/2006 has that issue.

Michael Thomas
Mathbox
978-683-6718
1-877-MATHBOX (Toll Free)
  

 


  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 9:22 PM
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: SPAM-WARN:[IMail Forum] 8.22 virtual domain checks


Has anyone noticed with IMail 8.22 having to restart SMTP and/or Queue
Manager after the addition or deletion of virtual domains and domain
aliases?
 
This was not required with 8.15, but with 8.22 I've noticed specific cases
of having to restart services for IMail to recognize virtual domain aliases
or deletion of a virtual domain.
 
Do similar problems exist in 2006?  Having to restart services for changes
like this is extremely undesirable.


Darin.
 
 

RE: [IMail Forum] IMail 2006.x

[Kevin Gillis]

hi bonno,
 
good comments.  we'll check into multi select for no win browsers.
 
for #2, if you size the message box/grid, it will auto fill with as many
messages possible to fill up all of the newly sized window.  depending on
your previous settings (pre 2006.2), you may end up doing more Page
Scrolling (horizontal, the new mechanism) than intra-page scrolling
(vertical).
 
hope this helps,
 
kg

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bonno Bloksma
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 07:59
To: IMail_Forum
Subject: [IMail Forum] IMail 2006.x


Hi,
 
Could not find anymore which IMail 8.x features are still missing from IMail
2006.2, nor do I know wheter this was part of the original webinterface as
we extensively modified the original webinterface for our use. But
 
1)
We used to have selection boxes in front of each mail in the list which
could be ticked. Then people could select to delete the marked mails.
Now we have to use the standard way to select multiple items in a list. In
Windows one uses Ctrl+mouseklik and Shift+mouseclick. Funny thing is, other
standard ways like Shift+curor key don't work, Don't know what Mac or Linux
users use to select multiple items.
Was the method with the selection boxes part of the original interface?
Will that feature be introduced in the IMail 2006.x line webinterface?
 
2)
We used to be able to specify how many mails we wanted to see in the list
above the body of the selected mail. It seems I cannot set that number in
the preferences screen. Right now I have 123 pages of 10 items each, I'd
rather have a lot less pages with 20, 50 or a 100 items each.
 

Met vriendelijke groet,
Bonno Bloksma
hoofd systeembeheer


tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme 
begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /  http://www.tio.nl
www.tio.nl 

RE: [IMail Forum] changing language inside the mail interface

[Kevin Gillis]

Hello Chakib,
 
At this point, you have to exit the web messaging, change the language and
then re-login.
 
For #2, I'm not aware of anyone customizing the images on the rich text
editor control. not sure exactly where that interface change is made but
will look into it further.
 
bye for now,
 
kg

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chakib ben Bechir
Moussa
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 05:11
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] changing language inside the mail interface



Anybody can comment on this please.

 

Chakib Bechir Moussa 
Data Operation Center  Manager 
Operation Department
Shabakah.Net   
  
E-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
P.O. Box 55155, Riyadh 11534,  KSA 
Fax  : +966-14602281
Phone : +966-14602282
Universal:  920010011 

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chakib ben Bechir
Moussa
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 9:43 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] changing language inside the mail interface

 

 

Dears;

 

-  I would like to ask if it is possible to change the
interface language while the user is logged in. For example: If the user
chosed English while logging to Imail and then he wants to change the
language without logging out to Arabic, is it possible to do so?

-  Is it possible to change the picture for Net Spelling
(the one has ABC and check mark) to another picture? We have users who
prefer seeing a button shows (Check Spelling) instead. I can customize and
design the picture but I was not able to change it in Imail. I tried to
replace the picture netspell.gif in all the folders but it was not
affecting.

 

Thank you in advance.

 

RE: [IMail Forum] Please help me

[Kevin Gillis]

Hello Naren,
 
So you are looking for a highly redundant, failover configuration?  How
frequent would the replication be (real-time, minutes, other)?
 
To accomplish this, some IMail customers are using Microsoft Clustering
Server and DoubleTake.
 
Here is one IMail customer doing this with MSCS.
http://success.ipswitch.com/case_studies/cs_computerpoint.pdf
 
Hope this helps,
 
kg

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Naren
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 10:20
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Please help me



Hi

We need information about backup mails server can we install Back up mail
server and we can use both the servers simultaneously and if one is goes
down we can use the other please give me the information on this we are
facing some problems with the server so can we use the back server in remote
location, and both the servers will replicate each other please give me the
information on this its very impotent.

Regards

Naren


  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Will
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 8:29 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Web Messaging is Double Spaced



This issue does not present itself in firefox.  I have only seen it present
in IE6 and IE7 so far.  If I hold ctrl when hitting enter in IE, it is
single spaced.

 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Will
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 9:47 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Web Messaging is Double Spaced

 

Does anyone know why Web Messaging in 2006.1 is double spaced when composing
a new message and how I can turn that off?

 

Will

 

RE: [IMail Forum] Firefox 2.0.0.1 and WebMail ICS2006

[Kevin Gillis]

Travis, good catch!

Vincent, yes, 2006.2 addresses a few issues (e.g. column resizing is now
persistent, new, faster page scrolling, etc).  We'll be posting the release
notes for 2006.2 shortly, probably this week.

Hope this helps,

kg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vincent Toussaint
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 10:28
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Firefox 2.0.0.1 and WebMail ICS2006

Good call Travis!! ;)

I have a couple of add-ons running.  
The culprit was Skype Extension v2.2.0.50

It is disabled and I can select mail from the list with single click to get
the preview.  Too bad... that extension was nice :(

It is still buggy when resizing the columns (From, Subject, Received,
Size)...  I'll keep testing...

Thanks for the input!

--
Vincent Toussaint
Sys. Admin
Hybride (www.hybride.com)


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 6:46 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Firefox 2.0.0.1 and WebMail ICS2006

Make sure you disable all extensions and add-ons to eliminate one of them as
the problem.  AdBlock is usually a culprit here.

Travis

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vincent Toussaint
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 3:26 PM
To: imail_forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Firefox 2.0.0.1 and WebMail ICS2006

Hello people!!!

I was using SmarterMail since 2005...  We're looking to go back with Imail
or ICS.  I have downloaded the 30 trial and I am having some little problem
with Firefox.  In WebMail, when I use Firefox 2.0.0.1, when I click on
INBOX, the first message in the list is selected.  I can't select another
one (just single click) to get the preview.  If I want to read the second or
third or any other message in the list, I have to double click it to open it
in a new window or new tab.

The resize of column is also not behaving as it should... It messes the
screen and the column are not keeping the desired size...

If anyone out there have an idea of what it could be, it would be nice to
here it from you...

Ok... out for today!!! I'm glad to be back on this mailing list!! :)




--
Vincent Toussaint
Administrateur réseau - Network Admin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.hybride.com 


 





To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/



To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2

[Kevin Gillis]

Hello Dave,
 
Yes, you will be able to access 2006.2.
 
Please contact me directly and we'll take care of it.
 
bye for now,
 
kg

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Donathan
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 13:26
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2



Kevin,

 

I bought SA before 2006 came out but because of all the issues with it I
decided to wait and see how things went with it.

I was upset that there were so many people that were having problems and I
really couldn't afford to have any down time.

 

I now have a SA that expires February 21st and have never installed the
product.

 

Am I going to be able to download this new version that I can install
without having to install the original version and all the patches ?

 

Dave Donathan

 

 

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Gillis
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 09:09
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?

 

Hi Robert,

 

for those not on an active SA, we'll be reaching out on the forums (web,
email) and through emails and you will be able to access the build and the
release notes, starting next week.

 

bye for now,

 

kg

 

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert
Grosshandler
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 10:49
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?

Hi

 

Thanks for the consideration.  For those of us on 2006, but no longer on a
Service Agreement, what are the steps we'll need to take?

 

Yours,

 

Rob

 

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Gillis
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 6:38 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?

Hi All,

 

Anyone running IMail 2006 or with an active Service Agreement is entitled to
this release.

 

Bye for now,

 

kg

 

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Graveen
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 23:16
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?

Wow! My service agreement expires 2/21/2007, so I just miss it.  How
convenient.

Michael Graveen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  _  



Hi All,

We are in final testing of 2006.2. We plan on going gold in the next week
or so and releasing to public the first week of March. 

Current customers who want access to the gold build (when it's ready next
week) can do so by accessing the Technical Preview site on the forum:
http://www.ipswitch.com/forums/messages.aspx?ForumID=31

If you just want to try out the new web messaging without installing, you
can access it below. Some of the new web messaging features include faster
performance and new paging gui, safari support, persistence when sizing
columns, right mouse click for delete/mark as unread, better attachment
support, base64/japanese and chinese encoding support and a few others.

http://webdemo.ipswitch.com
Un: demo1
Pw: ipswitch

Bye for now,

kg 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher Checca
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:25
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?

Thanks everyone for the update.

Christopher Checca
Packard Transport, Inc.
IT Department
24021 South Municipal Dr
PO Box 380
Channahon, IL. 60410
815 467 9260
815 467 6939 Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.packardtransport.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 10:53 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?

Kevin Gillis told me on the 5th that they should be gold within the next 30
days. Since they want to make sure it's as thoroughly tested and debugged as
possible, that may not be an exact timeframe, but it sounds like it should
be available in Feb.

Darin.


- Original Message -
From: Christopher Checca 
To: 
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 7:52 AM
Subject: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?




Christopher Checca
Packard Transport, Inc.
IT Department
24021 South Municipal Dr
PO Box 380
Channahon, IL. 60410
815 467 9260
815 467 6939 Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.packardtransport.com

When should we expect ICS 2006.2? Anyone know?

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http

RE: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?

[Kevin Gillis]

Hi All,
 
Anyone running IMail 2006 or with an active Service Agreement is entitled to
this release.
 
Bye for now,
 
kg

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Graveen
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 23:16
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?


Wow! My service agreement expires 2/21/2007, so I just miss it.  How
convenient.

Michael Graveen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


  _  



Hi All,

We are in final testing of 2006.2. We plan on going gold in the next week
or so and releasing to public the first week of March. 

Current customers who want access to the gold build (when it's ready next
week) can do so by accessing the Technical Preview site on the forum:
http://www.ipswitch.com/forums/messages.aspx?ForumID=31

If you just want to try out the new web messaging without installing, you
can access it below. Some of the new web messaging features include faster
performance and new paging gui, safari support, persistence when sizing
columns, right mouse click for delete/mark as unread, better attachment
support, base64/japanese and chinese encoding support and a few others.

http://webdemo.ipswitch.com
Un: demo1
Pw: ipswitch

Bye for now,

kg 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher Checca
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:25
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?

Thanks everyone for the update.

Christopher Checca
Packard Transport, Inc.
IT Department
24021 South Municipal Dr
PO Box 380
Channahon, IL. 60410
815 467 9260
815 467 6939 Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.packardtransport.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 10:53 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?

Kevin Gillis told me on the 5th that they should be gold within the next 30
days. Since they want to make sure it's as thoroughly tested and debugged as
possible, that may not be an exact timeframe, but it sounds like it should
be available in Feb.

Darin.


- Original Message -
From: Christopher Checca 
To: 
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 7:52 AM
Subject: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?




Christopher Checca
Packard Transport, Inc.
IT Department
24021 South Municipal Dr
PO Box 380
Channahon, IL. 60410
815 467 9260
815 467 6939 Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.packardtransport.com

When should we expect ICS 2006.2? Anyone know?

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?

[Kevin Gillis]

Hi Grant,
 
Good ?. 
 
This is really a logistics issue.  We have 3 major releases in the next 5
weeks (WhatsUp Gold 11, IMail 2006.2 and WS_FTP Server 6 with SSH) plus a
Vista version of WS_FTP Professional 2007 right on the heels of the 3 major
releases. So we are spacing these out so that we an insure better launches
and provide proper levels of support to customers and resellers, worldwide.
 
I understand your wanting to wait until it's commercially available.  For
those who want access sooner (many in the Technical Preview Program are
already running it), you will have that option.
 
Bye for now,
 
kg

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grant Griffith
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 21:43
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?


I had thought public release was February?  Why the change?  I am not
comfortable going live with it until it has been publicly released a month
or so and now that pushes things back to May.  Not sure we can wait that
long...
 
Grant Griffith
Enhanced Telecommunications

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Kevin Gillis
Sent: Thu 1/25/2007 6:42 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?



Hi All,

We are in final testing of 2006.2.  We plan on going gold in the next week
or so and releasing to public the first week of March. 

Current customers who want access to the gold build (when it's ready next
week) can do so by accessing the Technical Preview site on the forum:
http://www.ipswitch.com/forums/messages.aspx?ForumID=31

If you just want to try out the new web messaging without installing, you
can access it below.  Some of the new web messaging features include faster
performance and new paging gui, safari support, persistence when sizing
columns, right mouse click for delete/mark as unread, better attachment
support, base64/japanese and chinese encoding support and a few others.

http://webdemo.ipswitch.com http://webdemo.ipswitch.com/ 
Un: demo1
Pw: ipswitch

Bye for now,

kg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher Checca
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:25
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?

Thanks everyone for the update.

Christopher Checca
Packard Transport, Inc.
IT Department
24021 South Municipal Dr
PO Box 380
Channahon, IL.  60410
815 467 9260
815 467 6939 Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.packardtransport.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 10:53 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?

Kevin Gillis told me on the 5th that they should be gold within the next 30
days. Since they want to make sure it's as thoroughly tested and debugged as
possible, that may not be an exact timeframe, but it sounds like it should
be available in Feb.

Darin.


- Original Message -
From: Christopher Checca [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 7:52 AM
Subject: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?




Christopher Checca
Packard Transport, Inc.
IT Department
24021 South Municipal Dr
PO Box 380
Channahon, IL.  60410
815 467 9260
815 467 6939 Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.packardtransport.com

When should we expect ICS 2006.2?   Anyone know?

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


attachment: winmail.dat

RE: SPAM-WARN:RE: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?

[Kevin Gillis]

Hi All,
 
I just want to reiterate and clarify this.  
 
Anyone running 2006.xx will get IMail 2006.2 at no charge (whether you have
an active Service agreement or not).  Also, anyone on an active Service
Agreement is also entitled to 2006.2 at no charge.
 
Hope this helps.
 
bye for now,
 
kg

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Thomas -
Mathbox
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 11:40
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN:RE: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?


Michael,
 
It is not irony. It is planned. Doesn't anyone remember the big service
agreement renewal push that Ipswitch had? It ended on/or around Nov 28 2005.
You got 15 months of service if you renewed. 
 

Michael Thomas
Mathbox
978-683-6718
1-877-MATHBOX (Toll Free)
  

 


  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Graveen
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 8:11 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: SPAM-WARN:RE: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?


Hi Kevin,
I realize that someone with an active service agreement would be eligible
for 2006.2.  I was just pointing out the irony that I will not have an
active service agreement when 2006.2 is released in March.

Mike

At 06:37 AM 1/26/2007, you wrote:


Hi All,
 
Anyone running IMail 2006 or with an active Service Agreement is entitled to
this release.
 
Bye for now,
 
kg


  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Graveen
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 23:16
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?

Wow! My service agreement expires 2/21/2007, so I just miss it.  How
convenient.

Michael Graveen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


  _  



Hi All,

We are in final testing of 2006.2. We plan on going gold in the next week
or so and releasing to public the first week of March. 

Current customers who want access to the gold build (when it's ready next
week) can do so by accessing the Technical Preview site on the forum:
http://www.ipswitch.com/forums/messages.aspx?ForumID=31

If you just want to try out the new web messaging without installing, you
can access it below. Some of the new web messaging features include faster
performance and new paging gui, safari support, persistence when sizing
columns, right mouse click for delete/mark as unread, better attachment
support, base64/japanese and chinese encoding support and a few others.

http://webdemo.ipswitch.com http://webdemo.ipswitch.com/ 
Un: demo1
Pw: ipswitch

Bye for now,

kg 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher Checca
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:25
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?

Thanks everyone for the update.

Christopher Checca
Packard Transport, Inc.
IT Department
24021 South Municipal Dr
PO Box 380
Channahon, IL. 60410
815 467 9260
815 467 6939 Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.packardtransport.com http://www.packardtransport.com/ 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 10:53 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?

Kevin Gillis told me on the 5th that they should be gold within the next 30
days. Since they want to make sure it's as thoroughly tested and debugged as
possible, that may not be an exact timeframe, but it sounds like it should
be available in Feb.

Darin.


- Original Message -
From: Christopher Checca 
To: 
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 7:52 AM
Subject: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?




Christopher Checca
Packard Transport, Inc.
IT Department
24021 South Municipal Dr
PO Box 380
Channahon, IL. 60410
815 467 9260
815 467 6939 Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.packardtransport.com http://www.packardtransport.com/ 

When should we expect ICS 2006.2? Anyone know?

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum@list.ipswitch.com/ 
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum@list.ipswitch.com/ 
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum@list.ipswitch.com/ 
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum@list.ipswitch.com/ 
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http

RE: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?

[Kevin Gillis]

Hi Robert,
 
for those not on an active SA, we'll be reaching out on the forums (web,
email) and through emails and you will be able to access the build and the
release notes, starting next week.
 
bye for now,
 
kg

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert
Grosshandler
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 10:49
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?


Hi
 
Thanks for the consideration.  For those of us on 2006, but no longer on a
Service Agreement, what are the steps we'll need to take?
 
Yours,
 
Rob

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Gillis
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 6:38 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?


Hi All,
 
Anyone running IMail 2006 or with an active Service Agreement is entitled to
this release.
 
Bye for now,
 
kg

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Graveen
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 23:16
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?


Wow! My service agreement expires 2/21/2007, so I just miss it.  How
convenient.

Michael Graveen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


  _  



Hi All,

We are in final testing of 2006.2. We plan on going gold in the next week
or so and releasing to public the first week of March. 

Current customers who want access to the gold build (when it's ready next
week) can do so by accessing the Technical Preview site on the forum:
http://www.ipswitch.com/forums/messages.aspx?ForumID=31

If you just want to try out the new web messaging without installing, you
can access it below. Some of the new web messaging features include faster
performance and new paging gui, safari support, persistence when sizing
columns, right mouse click for delete/mark as unread, better attachment
support, base64/japanese and chinese encoding support and a few others.

http://webdemo.ipswitch.com
Un: demo1
Pw: ipswitch

Bye for now,

kg 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher Checca
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:25
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?

Thanks everyone for the update.

Christopher Checca
Packard Transport, Inc.
IT Department
24021 South Municipal Dr
PO Box 380
Channahon, IL. 60410
815 467 9260
815 467 6939 Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.packardtransport.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 10:53 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?

Kevin Gillis told me on the 5th that they should be gold within the next 30
days. Since they want to make sure it's as thoroughly tested and debugged as
possible, that may not be an exact timeframe, but it sounds like it should
be available in Feb.

Darin.


- Original Message -
From: Christopher Checca 
To: 
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 7:52 AM
Subject: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?




Christopher Checca
Packard Transport, Inc.
IT Department
24021 South Municipal Dr
PO Box 380
Channahon, IL. 60410
815 467 9260
815 467 6939 Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.packardtransport.com

When should we expect ICS 2006.2? Anyone know?

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?

[Kevin Gillis]

Hi All,

We are in final testing of 2006.2.  We plan on going gold in the next week
or so and releasing to public the first week of March.  

Current customers who want access to the gold build (when it's ready next
week) can do so by accessing the Technical Preview site on the forum:
http://www.ipswitch.com/forums/messages.aspx?ForumID=31

If you just want to try out the new web messaging without installing, you
can access it below.  Some of the new web messaging features include faster
performance and new paging gui, safari support, persistence when sizing
columns, right mouse click for delete/mark as unread, better attachment
support, base64/japanese and chinese encoding support and a few others.

http://webdemo.ipswitch.com
Un: demo1
Pw: ipswitch

Bye for now,

kg 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher Checca
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:25
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?

Thanks everyone for the update.

Christopher Checca
Packard Transport, Inc.
IT Department
24021 South Municipal Dr
PO Box 380
Channahon, IL.  60410
815 467 9260
815 467 6939 Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.packardtransport.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 10:53 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?

Kevin Gillis told me on the 5th that they should be gold within the next 30
days. Since they want to make sure it's as thoroughly tested and debugged as
possible, that may not be an exact timeframe, but it sounds like it should
be available in Feb.

Darin.


- Original Message -
From: Christopher Checca [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 7:52 AM
Subject: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?




Christopher Checca
Packard Transport, Inc.
IT Department
24021 South Municipal Dr
PO Box 380
Channahon, IL.  60410
815 467 9260
815 467 6939 Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.packardtransport.com

When should we expect ICS 2006.2?   Anyone know?

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?

[Kevin Gillis]

Hello Travis,

We will include the full release notes in the announcement mentioned below.
There are quite a bit of fixes and features included.

Bye for now,

kg 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 19:20
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?

I realize this might be premature, but is there a list of fixes/enhancements
for this release yet?

T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Gillis
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 3:43 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?

Hi All,

We are in final testing of 2006.2.  We plan on going gold in the next week
or so and releasing to public the first week of March.  

Current customers who want access to the gold build (when it's ready next
week) can do so by accessing the Technical Preview site on the forum:
http://www.ipswitch.com/forums/messages.aspx?ForumID=31

If you just want to try out the new web messaging without installing, you
can access it below.  Some of the new web messaging features include faster
performance and new paging gui, safari support, persistence when sizing
columns, right mouse click for delete/mark as unread, better attachment
support, base64/japanese and chinese encoding support and a few others.

http://webdemo.ipswitch.com
Un: demo1
Pw: ipswitch

Bye for now,

kg 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher Checca
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:25
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?

Thanks everyone for the update.

Christopher Checca
Packard Transport, Inc.
IT Department
24021 South Municipal Dr
PO Box 380
Channahon, IL.  60410
815 467 9260
815 467 6939 Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.packardtransport.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 10:53 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?

Kevin Gillis told me on the 5th that they should be gold within the next 30
days. Since they want to make sure it's as thoroughly tested and debugged as
possible, that may not be an exact timeframe, but it sounds like it should
be available in Feb.

Darin.


- Original Message -
From: Christopher Checca [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 7:52 AM
Subject: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2?




Christopher Checca
Packard Transport, Inc.
IT Department
24021 South Municipal Dr
PO Box 380
Channahon, IL.  60410
815 467 9260
815 467 6939 Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.packardtransport.com

When should we expect ICS 2006.2?   Anyone know?

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Re: [IMail Forum] HTML Email munged on TREO phones ( 2006.1)

[Kevin Gillis]

hi marc,
thanks for the post. a few quick questions.
1) in the example below, only the subject gets through but body and signature do not?
2) Also, if there is no signature, does the subject and body both come through okay?
3)If it's plain text, does it come through okay (subject/body/signature) regardless of whether there's a signature?
bye for now,
kg-Original Message-From: "Marc Catuogno" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent 12/27/2006 1:39:18 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] HTML Email munged on TREO phones ( 2006.1)I truly hope that 2006.2 is released soon and fixes the issue where any HTML
Email that includes a signature sent to individuals using Treo phones
results in the person on the Treo only getting the subject of the Email.
This is becoming more and more of a problem for my users.

Marc

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] Building an ASSP box...

[Kevin Gillis]

Hello Art,

This is worth taking a look at - provides some rough guidelines.

http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-20060728-JH03.htm

Bye for now,

kg 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Plato, Art
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 13:47
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Building an ASSP box...

I realize this thread is off OT for Imail, but I was wondering how much
hardware it would take to handle 750,000 emails and 5000 mailboxes a day?

TIA,
Art Plato

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Royce Burnett
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 1:16 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Building an ASSP box...

I'm running it on a 1 GHz dell with 512MB, WIn2K Pro ( not server) handling
about 5K messages/day ( this has dropped from when I started this whole
project, I suspect lots of spammers aren't even trying anymore, but I can't
prove it). I'm using a separate box from my Imail box, but thats only
because my Imail box is definitely too small to handle both chores. (
p2-350, 256 MB !!!) Advice is available on the links that someone has
already posted.

g'luck
Royce Burnett

At 11:28 AM 15/12/2006 -0600, you wrote:
Has anyone done this?
If so, how is it working  any advice for a newbie on setting one up?
I have a choice of setting it up on a box that has dual 700Mhz CPUs 
1G of
RAM or an Athelon 1500 with 512MB of ram.
Can this run on W2k Pro or does it have to be Win2k Server?
If it catches good mail, is there an easy way to forward on to the
intended
recepient, or will it be flagged as spam again?
Thanks for any advice.


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]




---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] IMail trial software

[Kevin Gillis]

Hi John,

That is correct.  The IMail trial is fully functional and runs for 30 days.

If this is a new purchase, you'll need a single key for any product that
does not have Symantec and two keys with Symantec.

Bye for now,

kg 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Richardson
Sent: Saturday, December 09, 2006 11:47
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] IMail trial software

Hi Matt,

To the best of my understanding and recollection, I believe it is fully
functional for thirty days. If you fail to run the activation and provide a
valid license key within that timeframe, the outgoing mail stops
functioning. The service will NOT start after thirty days until it has been
activated.

If you're going to go with ICS, be advised that you may end up with two
different license codes that need to be activated. This is a personal
experience I have just gone through. I knew I had done an activation, and I
was well outside that thirty day window, but apparently that was only for
Imail. The WorkGroup Share Service refused to start somewhere after about
sixty days or so. I just activated another code provided to me by Ipswitch
tech support after inquiring why the service quit starting. That second code
activation fixed that problem, so heads up if that happens to you later on.


Hope that helps, good luck!


John


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 7:56 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] IMail trial software

I'm in need of doing a clean install for a client with an existing IMail 8x
box, but we don't expect for their new license to come in by the scheduled
time and are going to the 9.x version.  I was wondering how safe it would be
to install the software in the trial setup.  
Essentially I need to know if any functionality is limited under the trial
license in any way or if there are any other concerns besides just a 30 day
limit (or whatever it is).  I would appreciate the help here in relation to
official feedback or experiences from those that have used the trial for a
production server.

Much appreciated,

Matt
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] Encoding List

[Kevin Gillis]

Hello Chakib,
 
When you mention the drop down menu, sounds like you are referring to the
encoding (under preferences and not the language picker on the home page).  
 
we have a white paper on how to add new languages (
http://www.ipswitch.com/support/imail/guide/2006/2006_1/CreatingANewLangFile
.pdf ) but there's not an equivalent to add/modify the encodings.  I have
added to the feature backlog.
 
Regarding the R to L interface,  we will need to look some more into this
one.  In the past we have not received many requests for this and hence it's
been a lower priority.
 
bye for now,
 
kg

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chakib ben Bechir
Moussa
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 19:58
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Encoding List



Just to update regarding the Arabic encoding, I have just made an email to
test to hotmail account and the Arabic contents was showing as rabish, I
made a test email to gmail and our exchange server but it was clear and
correct, is this issue to do with encoding of the IMail being used?

 

I tried changing the encoding of the IE but with no success and the message
in Hotmail was not able to be corrected!

 

Chakib Bechir Moussa 
Help Desk  Manager 
Customer Support Department
Shabakah.Net   
  
E-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
P.O. Box 55155, Riyadh 11534,  KSA 
Fax  : +966-14602281
Phone : +966-14602282
Universal:  920010011 

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chakib ben Bechir
Moussa
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 3:24 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Encoding List

 

Hi Kevin;

 

First of all, I would like to thank you for your prompt answer to my
inquiry, it is really nice to see the IT community responding

like this. I believe I should also be helpful to other people whenever I
can.

 

I am looking to add Arabic encoding, it is true that it should be working
without adding, but I have customers who don't understand that,

They just requested it to be shown on that drop down menu. Is there a way to
add it for just the look, I don't even need it to be functioning

Because I don't see any need for that, I have tested the Arabic by sending
and receiving emails in Arabic and there was no problem.

So, if I just add that option to the drop down menu and make it attached to
the UTF-8 will be great, so I can finish this task.

 

I really also need your suggestions about the second problem, I believe that
there are other languages that use right to left alignments, and it would

Be very useful to prepare the solution for others who could be interested in
using IMail.

To explain well the problem:

When a user enters the login page, he will be able to chose either Arabic or
English language, when he chooses English then the default

Settings should be kept without any changes, but when choosing the Arabic
language, first the logon page has to be redirected from right to left (even
the scroll bar should be aligned to the left) this in HTML can be done using
(dir=rtl) and also when he is logged in into his account he should have
the alignment from right to left for all the templates. Currently the
templates show Arabic translation but it looks missy because of this
alignment problem.

Helping me in this issue would be appreciated a lot.

 

Regards,

 

Chakib Bechir Moussa 

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Gillis
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 5:33 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Encoding List

 

Hello Chakib,

 

What encoding are you looking to add?  2006.2 will include Japanese and 2
different Chinese encodings, plus base64 support.

 

Bye for now,

 

kg

 

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chakib ben Bechir
Moussa
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 09:19
To: imail_forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Encoding List

Dears;

 

1- I am looking for a way to include one more Encoding object in the
template for composing new message option drop down menu,

I have only three options (Unicode UTF-8, English (US) , western European). 

Also this can be found in the Preferences of Client interface -- Sending
-- Default Message Encoding

 

Is it possible to add one more option to that list? If yes, please show me
the steps for that.

 

I have IMail 2006.1 version.

2- One more thing: I have been searching in the archive of this forum for a
solution to another customization problem,

I want my clients to chose a language and depending on that option the
interface will be directed from left to right or right to left (dir=rtl)
thing.

I found one person who asked that same question 2 years back but there was
no answer provided.

Anybody has an idea how to make that option work?

RE: [IMail Forum] Encoding List

[Kevin Gillis]

Hello Chakib,
 
What encoding are you looking to add?  2006.2 will include Japanese and 2
different Chinese encodings, plus base64 support.
 
Bye for now,
 
kg

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chakib ben Bechir
Moussa
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 09:19
To: imail_forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Encoding List



Dears;

 

1- I am looking for a way to include one more Encoding object in the
template for composing new message option drop down menu,

I have only three options (Unicode UTF-8, English (US) , western European). 

Also this can be found in the Preferences of Client interface -- Sending
-- Default Message Encoding

 

Is it possible to add one more option to that list? If yes, please show me
the steps for that.

 

I have IMail 2006.1 version.

2- One more thing: I have been searching in the archive of this forum for a
solution to another customization problem,

I want my clients to chose a language and depending on that option the
interface will be directed from left to right or right to left (dir=rtl)
thing.

I found one person who asked that same question 2 years back but there was
no answer provided.

Anybody has an idea how to make that option work?

RE: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail Forum] IMail 2006.2 Technical Preview Program

[Kevin Gillis]

Hi Bruce,

Good comments.

#3 is coming (settable, by end user, later, settable/forcible by Admin) in
2006.2.  plain text mode will still allow url's to be clickable. 

#2 is similar, will add to feature list.

Bye for now,

kg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Barnes
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 17:40
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail Forum] IMail 2006.2 Technical Preview
Program 

Ipswitch;
 
I have a couple of issues I hope were addressed in the next version:
 
1. The SECURITY ISSUE.  NO IIS account should ever have administrative
privileges - period.  If this version of the software is going to continue
to require the IUSR account to have administrative privileges, then the
conversation of our client base is a flat out NO GO - NO WAY for us as it
leaves a gaping security hole at the point of the web server.  ALL IUSR
ACCOUNTS SHOULD BE READ ONLY PRIVLIDGES ONLY - NOTHING ELSE!
 
2. Along the lines of an ADD IT BACK IN request is the ability to CONVERT
ALL INCOMING MAIL TO PLAIN TEXT.  It was in 8.2 and should be included in
2006 as well.  We work with medical clients and they have now forbidden the
receipt or sending of HTML based e-mail to and from their centers.  NO HTML
MESSAGES FOR ANY USERS!
 
3. Concurrently, we should be able to FORCE the web based users to be able
to only send in PLAIN TEXT as well.  
 
When combined with #2 above, it means NO HTML MESSAGES FOR ANY USERS,
whether incoming or outgoing - no exceptions!

4. Along those same lines, it would be nice to be able to restrict LISTS to
PLAIN TEXT ONLY as well.
 
Thanks in advance,
Bruce Barnes
ChicagoNetTech

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephane Moskovic
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 16:09
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail Forum] IMail 2006.2 Technical Preview
Program 


Looking forward to the new version. I couldn't get to the release notes
(broken link), but here are some improvements that I hope will be included:

Security:
- Locking of accounts after x number of failed logins (IMAP, POP3, SMTP)
within a certain timeframe (with lock expiration) - This is really essential
in my opinion and it was a feature in Imail 8.x so I recall do not
understand why it was dropped in 2006.

Webmail:
- One line text input for the To... field in the webmail instead of a
multi-line text area, so that webmail users can use their browser's
auto-fill function to recall frequently emailed contacts (multi-line is ok
for cc and bcc fields)
- Let the user select to only show images (especially external url images)
as a global preference and/or per message.
- Search per folder (unless I missed it I think the current webmail version
only allows searching of all folders)
- Check boxes to select message(s) in message list views (so a single
message can be selected without opening it even if the preview pane is
visible)

Thanks.

-Original Message-
From: Jason Benton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent 11/27/2006 4:07:01 PM
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] IMail 2006.2 Technical Preview Program 





You are invited to participate in the IMail 2006.2 Technical Preview
Program!

The IMail Development Team has been hard at work on the latest release of
IMail. This release includes many exciting new features that have been
requested from our user base. The Technical Preview Program allows users to
interact directly with the IMail development team to experience and perfect
new features and functionality within the software. Participants are invited
to attend live demos, communicate via a special forum, download preview
builds, and qualify for special prizes and incentives. 

If you're enthusiastic about working with new technologies, new product
features, and the latest versions of our applications, then we have some
really exciting things to show you!

Sign me up! http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=980722920758 

Highlights of What's New in IMail Server 2006.2

*   OpenSSL - IMail Server now uses Version 0.9.8c. 
*   IMAP - Web Mail no longer uses IMAP for mailbox access: it now
reads/writes mailboxes directly. 
*   ODBC - A change has been made to the ODBCUser.dll used with external
user databases shipped with IMail.  The changes are in the GetUser,
GetUser2, and GetNextUser functions exported from the dll. This allows you
to add, find, and implement global user changes for external databases. 
*   Installs - Online and offline activation and registration are now
included in the installation. 
*   Installs: option available to not reset permissions on repair 
*   POP3 now can be configured to restrict how often clients can pop
their mail. 
*   SMTPD - Better error reporting in logs for smtp_deliv_failed 
*   Web Mail now uses .NET 2.0. 
*   Web Mail message list has been redesigned for better 

RE: [IMail Forum] Utility to find pop3 load problem

[Kevin Gillis]

Hi All,
 
In 2006.2, there is a new capability (optional), settable by admin, that
allows you to set the POP frequency.  For example, if set to 5 mins, end
users can only POP once every 5 minutes.
 
Bye for now,
 
kg

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 08:36
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Utility to find pop3 load problem


I've always run the analyze tool for pop logins to see how many people are
checking email every 1 minute.
 
Bill Foresman 
Matrosity Hosting 
www.matrosity.com 
850.656.2644 
 

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nitesh Shah
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 8:05 AM
To: imail_forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Utility to find pop3 load problem


Hello,
 
Recently, we have been facing a heavy load on the pop3 service because of
which the server becomes slow. Is there an utilty to find out how many users
are connecting to the pop3 in short intervals and what is causing the
problem for the load?
 
Nitaish


  _  

Cheap Talk? Check
http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman8/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/ev
t=39663/*http://voice.yahoo.com out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call
rates. 

RE: [IMail Forum] Utility to find pop3 load problem

[Kevin Gillis]

hi bill,
 
per domain, you set that pop users can only pop once per x minutes - this is
tracked accordingly.  once the x minutes has passed, block is cleared and
user can pop again.  we can pass more details offline if necessary
 
again, this is optional.
 
bye for now,
 
kg

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 09:53
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Utility to find pop3 load problem


just curious how that works?
 

Bill Foresman 
Matrosity Hosting 
www.matrosity.com 
850.656.2644 

 

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Gillis
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 9:51 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Utility to find pop3 load problem


Hi All,
 
In 2006.2, there is a new capability (optional), settable by admin, that
allows you to set the POP frequency.  For example, if set to 5 mins, end
users can only POP once every 5 minutes.
 
Bye for now,
 
kg

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 08:36
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Utility to find pop3 load problem


I've always run the analyze tool for pop logins to see how many people are
checking email every 1 minute.
 
Bill Foresman 
Matrosity Hosting 
www.matrosity.com 
850.656.2644 
 

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nitesh Shah
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 8:05 AM
To: imail_forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Utility to find pop3 load problem


Hello,
 
Recently, we have been facing a heavy load on the pop3 service because of
which the server becomes slow. Is there an utilty to find out how many users
are connecting to the pop3 in short intervals and what is causing the
problem for the load?
 
Nitaish


  _  

Cheap Talk? Check
http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman8/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/ev
t=39663/*http://voice.yahoo.com out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call
rates. 

RE: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the Web Mail - Imail 2006.1 ...

[Kevin Gillis]

Hi All,
 
Just wanted to interject that although #2 and #3 are fixed in 2006.2, we are
still looking at #1 - the double spacing that occurs in compose mode.  At
this point, we don't have a fix that we can include in 2006.2 - something
strange with the rich text editor (freetextbox -
http://freetextbox.com/default.aspx).  We are more than open to any
technical tips/tricks/techniques to get around this annoying behavior.
 
One workaround, perhaps acceptable to some, might be a plain-text mode for
composing in which single spacing would be the default/expected behavior.
 
Bye for now,
 
kg

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gil Gomes
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 11:15
To: imail_forum@list.ipswitch.com; Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the Web Mail -
Imail 2006.1 ...



   Kevin, Tripp and others have been very helpful in testing these three
issues and insuring that they've all been corrected in 2006.2.   I'm now
looking forward to moving to that version as the correction of these three
nagging problems alone is more than enough to offset the pain of
upgrading...

Thanx, guys...
-Gil

1) Hitting the Enter key double spaces

2) Some incoming email displays a date of December 1969

3) Some attachments retain the name Download.aspx as opposed to their
actual filename as sent.  



-Original Message-
From: Gil Gomes 
Sent 11/17/2006 8:20:33 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the Web Mail -
Imail 2006.1 ...



Kevin:

   This is your entire list and current prioritization for WebMail?
Should we assume the issues we've been constantly bringing up aren't going
to be addressed in the near term? To name a few:

Hitting the Enter key double spaces

Some incoming email displays a date of December 1969

Some attachments retain the name Download.aspx as opposed to their actual
filename as sent.  

   Please advise...
-Gil



-Original Message-
From: Kevin Gillis 
Sent 11/16/2006 3:10:06 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the Web Mail -
Imail 2006.1 ...

Hi Matt,

Thanks, good additions. I've added to the list which, in entirety is. Our
current prioritization is as noted below and we'll adjust as feedback comes
in.

 1. what to do with deleted messages
 2. what to do with Sent messages
 3. disabling Forwarding
 4. what to do with attachments and should attachment gui be on by default 
5. CC/BCC on/Off by default

6. Disabling Vacation Messages.
7. Set default message composition encoding to plain/text or text/HTML 
8. Set text/HTML messages to be multipart with plain/text segment or
without.
9. Turn display of images on or off by default, but allow user override if
allowed by system admin.
10. Limit the number of aliases per domain that can be added just like the
accounts, but this needs to be locked down to just the administrator.

Bye for now,

kg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 19:43
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the Web Mail -
Imail 2006.1 ...

Kevin,

You might want to add to that:

6. Disabling Vacation Messages.
7. Set default message composition encoding to plain/text or text/HTML 8.
Set text/HTML messages to be multipart with plain/text segment or without.
9. Turn display of images on or off by default, but allow user override if
allowed by system admin.
10. Limit the number of aliases per domain that can be added just like the
accounts, but this needs to be locked down to just the administrator.

The last three I believe involve new functionality as well as system-wide
controls.

Matt



Kevin Gillis wrote:
 Hi David,

 Okay, that makes sense - system wide (only settable by sysadmin), 
 domain wide (only settable by host admin) and end user can only access 
 what has been granted changeable by them.

 What is your top list of features to be configurable - here's what I 
 have thus far. Please rank.

 1. what to do with deleted messages
 2. what to do with Sent messages
 3. disabling Forwarding
 4. what to do with attachments and should attachment gui be on by 
 default 5. CC/BCC on/Off by default

 Bye for now,

 kg

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Gregg
 Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 09:55
 To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
 Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the Web 
 Mail - Imail 2006.1 ...

 Kevin,

 As long as we are discussing wishlists

 From an email hosting perspective, inheritance would go a long way to 
 improving service. The following would apply to all mail services - 
 not only web messaging.

 The system admin should be able to set server-wide defaults/limits and 
 specify

RE: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the Web Mail - Imail 2006.1 ...

[Kevin Gillis]

Hello Ravi,
 
Good request.
 
So would this (the whitelist) be per user or per domain?
 
bye for now,
 
kg

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ravi Reddy
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 09:59
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the
Web Mail - Imail 2006.1 ...



Kevin,

I would like to see a way so that  user can add domain or email address to
the whitelist.  After opening the email there is link to add to address
book, provide a link add to whitelist next to it.  Our biggest problem
currently is good mail going into junk or bulk mail.  By providing the link
add to whitelist we eliminate lot of problems as the resposibility lies with
the user not with provider.  Suppress the error message if there is a
duplicate. 

Thanks

Ravi Reddy



-Original Message-
From: Kevin Gillis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent 11/15/2006 5:59:34 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the Web Mail -
Imail 2006.1 ...

Hi David,

Okay, that makes sense - system wide (only settable by sysadmin), domain
wide (only settable by host admin) and end user can only access what has
been granted changeable by them.

What is your top list of features to be configurable - here's what I have
thus far. Please rank.

1. what to do with deleted messages
2. what to do with Sent messages
3. disabling Forwarding
4. what to do with attachments and should attachment gui be on by default
5. CC/BCC on/Off by default

Bye for now,

kg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Gregg
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 09:55
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the Web Mail -
Imail 2006.1 ...

Kevin,

As long as we are discussing wishlists

From an email hosting perspective, inheritance would go a long way to 
improving service. The following would apply to all mail services - not
only web messaging.

The system admin should be able to set server-wide defaults/limits and
specify whether they can be over-ridden or not.

Next the host admin should be allowed to set host-wide defaults/limits for
the host that the system admin configured to allow over-rides on - but not
exceed any limits that may be imposed by the system admin.

Next, the end user changes must only be allowed within what the host admin
allowed or inherited from the system admin and chose not to over-ride
themselves.

Lastly, the server admin *only* should be able to over-ride any
defaults/limits for a user or host - even if different than system or host
limits.


Regards,

David Gregg
--
mxGuard for IMail
The no-nonsense antispam and antivirus solution.

Download a free 30-day trial at
http://www.mxguard.com/postmaster/freetrial.asp
--

- Original Message -
From: Kevin Gillis 
To: 
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 6:37 AM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the Web Mail -
Imail 2006.1 ...


Hello Jose,

Thanks for the input - very good request.

We have seen this one more and more over the past few months and plan to
finalize some requirements on this.

For example, regarding the items below, which are you looking for?

1. settable default (by admin) but changeable within web mail preferences by
end user ==KG In this model, Admin sets all deleted mail to not be moved to
Deleted by End User can change if they wish.
2. settable default (by admin) but NOT changeable within web mail
preferences by end user ==KG In this model, Admin sets all deleted mail to
not be moved to Deleted and there is no way for the end user to change this.

Bye for now,

kg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jose Mª Valades
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 05:07
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the Web Mail - Imail
2006.1 ...

How can be changed the preferences of all the users in the Web Mail?

For example, when erasing a message in mail Web, this erases efinitivamente
and it does not happen to the wastebasket.


Preferences in Webmail 2006.1
By defect the this selected option of Purge message
Delete Options
Move to Deleted to folder
*Purge message
*Confirm Before Delete

I have found this in Support of Ipswitch Knowledge Base But I have not
helped me I do not have in an ODBC external data base
http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-19991021-DM03.htm


I wait for your aid thank you very much.


_

Departamento Tecnico Mastercom
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.bme.es
 Tel: 902 52 50 05

Nota legal

Este mensaje electrónico contiene información de B.M.Extremadura, S.L con
CIF: B-06162416 que es privada y confidencial, siendo para el uso exclusivo
de la persona(s

RE: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the Web Mail - Imail 2006.1 ...

[Kevin Gillis]

Hi David,

Thanks - top 3 are def the ones we hear most.

For #4, the requests we are hearing around attachments are whether they can
be forwarded or not (ties into #3) and whether the interface for adding an
attachment should be turned on by default in the compose window.

Bye for now,

kg 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Gregg
Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2006 10:15
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the Web Mail -
Imail 2006.1 ...

Kevin,

I think 1-3 are good.
#4 - Should always have access to attrachments.
#5 - No need to limit use of cc/bcc.

---

Hi David,

Okay, that makes sense - system wide (only settable by sysadmin), domain
wide (only settable by host admin) and end user can only access what has
been granted changeable by them.

What is your top list of features to be configurable - here's what I have
thus far.  Please rank.

1. what to do with deleted messages
2. what to do with Sent messages
3. disabling Forwarding
4. what to do with attachments and should attachment gui be on by default 5.
CC/BCC on/Off by default

Bye for now,

kg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Gregg
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 09:55
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the Web Mail -
Imail 2006.1 ...

Kevin,

As long as we are discussing wishlists

From an email hosting perspective,   inheritance would go a long way to
improving service.  The following would apply to all mail services - not
only web messaging.

The system admin should be able to set server-wide defaults/limits and
specify whether they can be over-ridden or not.

Next the host admin should be allowed to set host-wide defaults/limits for
the host that the system admin configured to allow over-rides on - but not
exceed any limits that may be imposed by the system admin.

Next, the end user changes must only be allowed within what the host admin
allowed or inherited from the system admin and chose not to over-ride
themselves.

Lastly, the server admin *only* should be able to over-ride any
defaults/limits for a user or host - even if different than system or host
limits.


Regards,

David Gregg
--
mxGuard for IMail
The no-nonsense antispam and antivirus solution.

Download a free 30-day trial at
http://www.mxguard.com/postmaster/freetrial.asp
--

- Original Message -
From: Kevin Gillis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 6:37 AM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the Web Mail -
Imail 2006.1 ...


Hello Jose,

Thanks for the input - very good request.

We have seen this one more and more over the past few months and plan to
finalize some requirements on this.

For example, regarding the items below, which are you looking for?

1. settable default (by admin) but changeable within web mail preferences by
end user ==KG In this model, Admin sets all deleted mail to not be moved to
Deleted by End User can change if they wish.
2. settable default (by admin) but NOT changeable within web mail
preferences by end user ==KG In this model, Admin sets all deleted mail to
not be moved to Deleted and there is no way for the end user to change this.

Bye for now,

kg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jose Mª Valades
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 05:07
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the Web Mail - Imail
2006.1 ...

How can be changed the preferences of all the users in the Web Mail?

For example, when erasing a message in mail Web, this erases efinitivamente
and it does not happen to the wastebasket.


Preferences in Webmail 2006.1
By defect the this selected option of Purge message
Delete Options
Move to Deleted to folder
*Purge message
*Confirm Before Delete

I have found this in Support of Ipswitch Knowledge Base But I have not
helped me I do not have in an ODBC external data base
http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-19991021-DM03.htm


I wait for your aid thank you very much.


_

Departamento Tecnico Mastercom
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.bme.es
 Tel: 902 52 50 05

Nota legal

Este mensaje electrónico contiene información de B.M.Extremadura, S.L  con
CIF: B-06162416 que es privada y confidencial, siendo para el uso exclusivo
de la persona(s) entidad/es arriba encionada/s.
Si usted no es el destinatario señalado, le informamos de que cualquier
divulgación, copia, distribución o uso de los contenidos está prohibida.
Si usted ha recibido este mensaje por error, por favor borre su contenido lo
antes posible. Gracias. Si usted no desea recibir más

RE: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the Web Mail - Imail 2006.1 ...

[Kevin Gillis]

Hello Gil,
 
This list is just related to Inheritance and admin controllable
configurations.
 
I've noted the items below and will follow up off forum.
 
Bye for now,
 
kg

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gil Gomes
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 08:21
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the Web Mail -
Imail 2006.1 ...



Kevin:

   This is your entire list and current prioritization for WebMail?
Should we assume the issues we've been constantly bringing up aren't going
to be addressed in the near term? To name a few:

Hitting the Enter key double spaces

Some incoming email displays a date of December 1969

Some attachments retain the name Download.aspx as opposed to their actual
filename as sent.  

   Please advise...
-Gil



-Original Message-
From: Kevin Gillis 
Sent 11/16/2006 3:10:06 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the Web Mail -
Imail 2006.1 ...

Hi Matt,

Thanks, good additions. I've added to the list which, in entirety is. Our
current prioritization is as noted below and we'll adjust as feedback comes
in.

 1. what to do with deleted messages
 2. what to do with Sent messages
 3. disabling Forwarding
 4. what to do with attachments and should attachment gui be on by default 
5. CC/BCC on/Off by default

6. Disabling Vacation Messages.
7. Set default message composition encoding to plain/text or text/HTML 
8. Set text/HTML messages to be multipart with plain/text segment or
without.
9. Turn display of images on or off by default, but allow user override if
allowed by system admin.
10. Limit the number of aliases per domain that can be added just like the
accounts, but this needs to be locked down to just the administrator.

Bye for now,

kg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 19:43
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the Web Mail -
Imail 2006.1 ...

Kevin,

You might want to add to that:

6. Disabling Vacation Messages.
7. Set default message composition encoding to plain/text or text/HTML 8.
Set text/HTML messages to be multipart with plain/text segment or without.
9. Turn display of images on or off by default, but allow user override if
allowed by system admin.
10. Limit the number of aliases per domain that can be added just like the
accounts, but this needs to be locked down to just the administrator.

The last three I believe involve new functionality as well as system-wide
controls.

Matt



Kevin Gillis wrote:
 Hi David,

 Okay, that makes sense - system wide (only settable by sysadmin), 
 domain wide (only settable by host admin) and end user can only access 
 what has been granted changeable by them.

 What is your top list of features to be configurable - here's what I 
 have thus far. Please rank.

 1. what to do with deleted messages
 2. what to do with Sent messages
 3. disabling Forwarding
 4. what to do with attachments and should attachment gui be on by 
 default 5. CC/BCC on/Off by default

 Bye for now,

 kg

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Gregg
 Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 09:55
 To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
 Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the Web 
 Mail - Imail 2006.1 ...

 Kevin,

 As long as we are discussing wishlists

 From an email hosting perspective, inheritance would go a long way to 
 improving service. The following would apply to all mail services - 
 not only web messaging.

 The system admin should be able to set server-wide defaults/limits and 
 specify whether they can be over-ridden or not.

 Next the host admin should be allowed to set host-wide defaults/limits 
 for the host that the system admin configured to allow over-rides on - 
 but not exceed any limits that may be imposed by the system admin.

 Next, the end user changes must only be allowed within what the host 
 admin allowed or inherited from the system admin and chose not to 
 over-ride themselves.

 Lastly, the server admin *only* should be able to over-ride any 
 defaults/limits for a user or host - even if different than system or 
 host limits.


 Regards,

 David Gregg
 --
 mxGuard for IMail
 The no-nonsense antispam and antivirus solution.

 Download a free 30-day trial at
 http://www.mxguard.com/postmaster/freetrial.asp
 --

 - Original Message -
 From: Kevin Gillis 
 To: 
 Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 6:37 AM
 Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the Web 
 Mail - Imail 2006.1 ...


 Hello Jose,

 Thanks for the input - very good request.

 We have seen this one more and more over the past few months and plan 
 to finalize some requirements on this.

 For example, regarding the items below, which are you looking for?

 1. settable

RE: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the Web Mail - Imail 2006.1 ...

[Kevin Gillis]

Hi Matt,

Thanks, good additions.  I've added to the list which, in entirety is.  Our
current prioritization is as noted below and we'll adjust as feedback comes
in.

 1. what to do with deleted messages
 2. what to do with Sent messages
 3. disabling Forwarding
 4. what to do with attachments and should attachment gui be on by default 
5. CC/BCC on/Off by default

6. Disabling Vacation Messages.
7. Set default message composition encoding to plain/text or text/HTML 
8. Set text/HTML messages to be multipart with plain/text segment or
without.
9. Turn display of images on or off by default, but allow user override if
allowed by system admin.
10. Limit the number of aliases per domain that can be added just like the
accounts, but this needs to be locked down to just the administrator.

Bye for now,

kg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 19:43
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the Web Mail -
Imail 2006.1 ...

Kevin,

You might want to add to that:

6. Disabling Vacation Messages.
7. Set default message composition encoding to plain/text or text/HTML 8.
Set text/HTML messages to be multipart with plain/text segment or without.
9. Turn display of images on or off by default, but allow user override if
allowed by system admin.
10. Limit the number of aliases per domain that can be added just like the
accounts, but this needs to be locked down to just the administrator.

The last three I believe involve new functionality as well as system-wide
controls.

Matt



Kevin Gillis wrote:
 Hi David,

 Okay, that makes sense - system wide (only settable by sysadmin), 
 domain wide (only settable by host admin) and end user can only access 
 what has been granted changeable by them.

 What is your top list of features to be configurable - here's what I 
 have thus far.  Please rank.

 1. what to do with deleted messages
 2. what to do with Sent messages
 3. disabling Forwarding
 4. what to do with attachments and should attachment gui be on by 
 default 5. CC/BCC on/Off by default

 Bye for now,

 kg

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Gregg
 Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 09:55
 To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
 Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the Web 
 Mail - Imail 2006.1 ...

 Kevin,

 As long as we are discussing wishlists

 From an email hosting perspective,   inheritance would go a long way to 
 improving service.  The following would apply to all mail services - 
 not only web messaging.

 The system admin should be able to set server-wide defaults/limits and 
 specify whether they can be over-ridden or not.

 Next the host admin should be allowed to set host-wide defaults/limits 
 for the host that the system admin configured to allow over-rides on - 
 but not exceed any limits that may be imposed by the system admin.

 Next, the end user changes must only be allowed within what the host 
 admin allowed or inherited from the system admin and chose not to 
 over-ride themselves.

 Lastly, the server admin *only* should be able to over-ride any 
 defaults/limits for a user or host - even if different than system or 
 host limits.


 Regards,

 David Gregg
 --
 mxGuard for IMail
 The no-nonsense antispam and antivirus solution.

 Download a free 30-day trial at
 http://www.mxguard.com/postmaster/freetrial.asp
 --

 - Original Message -
 From: Kevin Gillis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
 Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 6:37 AM
 Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the Web 
 Mail - Imail 2006.1 ...


 Hello Jose,

 Thanks for the input - very good request.

 We have seen this one more and more over the past few months and plan 
 to finalize some requirements on this.

 For example, regarding the items below, which are you looking for?

 1. settable default (by admin) but changeable within web mail 
 preferences by end user ==KG In this model, Admin sets all deleted 
 mail to not be moved to Deleted by End User can change if they wish.
 2. settable default (by admin) but NOT changeable within web mail 
 preferences by end user ==KG In this model, Admin sets all deleted 
 mail to not be moved to Deleted and there is no way for the end user to
change this.

 Bye for now,

 kg

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jose Mª 
 Valades
 Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 05:07
 To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
 Subject: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the Web Mail - 
 Imail
 2006.1 ...

 How can be changed the preferences of all the users in the Web Mail?

 For example, when erasing a message in mail Web, this erases 
 efinitivamente and it does not happen to the wastebasket.


 Preferences in Webmail 2006.1
 By defect the this selected option of Purge

RE: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the Web Mail - Imail 2006.1 ...

[Kevin Gillis]

Hi David,

Okay, that makes sense - system wide (only settable by sysadmin), domain
wide (only settable by host admin) and end user can only access what has
been granted changeable by them.

What is your top list of features to be configurable - here's what I have
thus far.  Please rank.

1. what to do with deleted messages
2. what to do with Sent messages
3. disabling Forwarding
4. what to do with attachments and should attachment gui be on by default
5. CC/BCC on/Off by default

Bye for now,

kg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Gregg
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 09:55
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the Web Mail -
Imail 2006.1 ...

Kevin,

As long as we are discussing wishlists

From an email hosting perspective,   inheritance would go a long way to 
improving service.  The following would apply to all mail services - not
only web messaging.

The system admin should be able to set server-wide defaults/limits and
specify whether they can be over-ridden or not.

Next the host admin should be allowed to set host-wide defaults/limits for
the host that the system admin configured to allow over-rides on - but not
exceed any limits that may be imposed by the system admin.

Next, the end user changes must only be allowed within what the host admin
allowed or inherited from the system admin and chose not to over-ride
themselves.

Lastly, the server admin *only* should be able to over-ride any
defaults/limits for a user or host - even if different than system or host
limits.


Regards,

David Gregg
--
mxGuard for IMail
The no-nonsense antispam and antivirus solution.

Download a free 30-day trial at
http://www.mxguard.com/postmaster/freetrial.asp
--

- Original Message -
From: Kevin Gillis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 6:37 AM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the Web Mail -
Imail 2006.1 ...


Hello Jose,

Thanks for the input - very good request.

We have seen this one more and more over the past few months and plan to
finalize some requirements on this.

For example, regarding the items below, which are you looking for?

1. settable default (by admin) but changeable within web mail preferences by
end user ==KG In this model, Admin sets all deleted mail to not be moved to
Deleted by End User can change if they wish.
2. settable default (by admin) but NOT changeable within web mail
preferences by end user ==KG In this model, Admin sets all deleted mail to
not be moved to Deleted and there is no way for the end user to change this.

Bye for now,

kg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jose Mª Valades
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 05:07
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the Web Mail - Imail
2006.1 ...

How can be changed the preferences of all the users in the Web Mail?

For example, when erasing a message in mail Web, this erases efinitivamente
and it does not happen to the wastebasket.


Preferences in Webmail 2006.1
By defect the this selected option of Purge message
Delete Options
Move to Deleted to folder
*Purge message
*Confirm Before Delete

I have found this in Support of Ipswitch Knowledge Base But I have not
helped me I do not have in an ODBC external data base
http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-19991021-DM03.htm


I wait for your aid thank you very much.


_

Departamento Tecnico Mastercom
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.bme.es
 Tel: 902 52 50 05

Nota legal

Este mensaje electrónico contiene información de B.M.Extremadura, S.L  con
CIF: B-06162416 que es privada y confidencial, siendo para el uso exclusivo
de la persona(s) entidad/es arriba encionada/s.
Si usted no es el destinatario señalado, le informamos de que cualquier
divulgación, copia, distribución o uso de los contenidos está prohibida.
Si usted ha recibido este mensaje por error, por favor borre su contenido lo
antes posible. Gracias. Si usted no desea recibir más información sobre
futuras y posibles comunicaciones que le enviemos puede solicitarlo de forma
gratuita en el correo electrónico [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
-
Normas para el correcto uso del correo electrónico:
http://www.rediris.es/mail/estilo.html
__

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com

RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Continuing issues - patch date?

[Kevin Gillis]

Hi Marc,

Good observations. 

Comments below...2006.2 is coming in Q1, but Technical Preview Program build
will be available later this month.

Bye for now,

kg 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Catuogno
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 21:40
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Continuing issues - patch date?

Dear Ipswitch,

Where is the patch? WHEN is the patch?:

Attachments forwarded from webmail clients show up as .txt attachments that
can't be opened.
==KG Should be addressed in 2006.2.

Links sent in plain text Emails aren't able to be clicked
==KG Should be addressed in 2006.2.

The ability to have a signature attached to replies and forwards would be
nice.
==KG Should be addressed in 2006.2.

Code the page so that the auto-refresh of the main page doesn't steal focus
from composing an Email.  At least make the auto-refresh update the message
list!
==KG Should be addressed in 2006.2.

Since the upgrade, my Korean agents can't send or receive Email with Korean
characters.
==KG Can you send more details?  What IMail Web Messaging are they using
and what encoding are they using? Ja and Chinese encoding support is coming
in 2006.2, may require that we add Korean as well...

When all dictionary attack fields are set to 0 Imail still somehow
mysteriously adds entries to the CAL.
==KG Will need more details on this one...

Contacts added from clicking the link from a received Email, there is no way
to add both the first and last name so the address sorts alphabetically. It
just adds the whole Email address as the first name.
==KG Good point.  Sounds like a good request that I'll look into.

When contacts were edited to add a first and last name it seems to add
duplicate entries instead of editing the original contacts.
==KG This sounds like a possible defect. Can you send me or TS steps to
reproduce ([EMAIL PROTECTED])?

Please make it possible to submit the username and password through a
different front end website so my users don't have to enter their username
and password twice.  This was possible in 2006.04 and earlier and isn't now
in 2006.1.
==KGYes, this changed in 2006.1.  Here is a KB link to it.
http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-20051206-DM06.htm


THANK YOU -

Oh, and Safari support -
==KG Addressed in 2006.2.


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the Web Mail - Imail 2006.1 ...

[Kevin Gillis]

Hello Jose,

Thanks for the input - very good request.  

We have seen this one more and more over the past few months and plan to
finalize some requirements on this.

For example, regarding the items below, which are you looking for?

1. settable default (by admin) but changeable within web mail preferences by
end user
==KG In this model, Admin sets all deleted mail to not be moved to Deleted
by End User can change if they wish.
2. settable default (by admin) but NOT changeable within web mail
preferences by end user
==KG In this model, Admin sets all deleted mail to not be moved to Deleted
and there is no way for the end user to change this.

Bye for now,

kg 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jose Mª Valades
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 05:07
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Preferences of all the users in the Web Mail - Imail
2006.1 ...

How can be changed the preferences of all the users in the Web Mail?

For example, when erasing a message in mail Web, this erases efinitivamente
and it does not happen to the wastebasket.


Preferences in Webmail 2006.1
By defect the this selected option of Purge message
Delete Options
Move to Deleted to folder
*Purge message
*Confirm Before Delete

I have found this in Support of Ipswitch Knowledge Base
But I have not helped me I do not have in an ODBC external data base
http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-19991021-DM03.htm


I wait for your aid thank you very much.


_

Departamento Tecnico Mastercom
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.bme.es
 Tel: 902 52 50 05

Nota legal

Este mensaje electrónico contiene información de 
B.M.Extremadura, S.L  con CIF: B-06162416 
que es privada y confidencial, siendo para el uso 
exclusivo de la persona(s) entidad/es arriba encionada/s. 
Si usted no es el destinatario señalado, le informamos de que cualquier
divulgación, copia, distribución o uso de los contenidos está prohibida. 
Si usted ha recibido este mensaje por error, por favor borre su contenido lo
antes posible. Gracias. Si usted no desea recibir más información sobre
futuras y posibles comunicaciones que le enviemos puede solicitarlo de forma
gratuita en el correo electrónico [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
-
Normas para el correcto uso del correo electrónico:
http://www.rediris.es/mail/estilo.html
__

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue

[Kevin Gillis]

Title: 2006.1 slow web logon issue



Hi Bill,

There's definitely something going on with this - no 
denying it. 

Here are a few questions to anyone experiencing this 
issue.

1) What DB are you using for 
authentication?
2) Is the slowness every time you log into any given account 
or just the first time you log in and 
subsequent logins to the same account are fine?
3) Is the slowness for only accounts that have a max mailbox 
size set?
4) If it's slow on just some accounts, what size are they in 
terms of # of messages and disk space?
bye for 
now,
kg


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity 
HostingSent: Sunday, October 29, 2006 08:54To: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issue

Kevin, I'm not the only one with this problem: 

http://www.ipswitch.com/forums/shwmessage.aspx?ForumID=10MessageID=22884 

In your own forums there's another case of 
this! 
Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 

[IMail Forum] Update for SMTP vulnerability in 8.22...

[Kevin Gillis]

Hi Don and all,

Appreciate all the feedback - it definitely helped to shape and expedite the
turnaround.  Nice work to Tripp and the team for turning it around in a
timely manner.

To answer earlier questions about what will be patched...

Unfortunately, we are not in a position to patch anything but the current
release and in this case, given that 8.22 stopped shipping within the last
12 months AND many customers are (for legitimate reasons) uncomfortable
upgrading to 2006.1, 8.22 as well.  We understand this puts some customers
in a must upgrade situation but you have the option to go to 8.22 or
straight to 2006.1. 

No doubt that larger software companies can patch and support older versions
going back years but our policy is really the current and major releases
that shipped in the previous 12 month.  It's not an excuse, but as a small,
private software company, we really don't have resources to patch say 6.xx,
7.xx, 8.xx and 2006.xx.  

There is lots of productive work being done on 2006.2 (addressing issues
raised here, in technical support and adding some new stuff) but going back
to code that is 2, 3 and sometimes 4 years old really stretches our
development and technical support organization and ultimately negatively
impacts current and active customers.

Hope this helps and thanks for your patience. 

Bye for now,

kg

 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Brown
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 01:47
To: Tripp Allen
Cc: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Update for SMTP vulnerability in 8.22

Thank you very much for this fix!

Many of us were between a rock and a hard place over this vulnerability and
not being able to upgrade for a variety of reasons.

I don't know what changed your mind about continuing to support 8.22, but
whatever it was surely raised your net worth with us. I'll bet Ipswitch got
one heck of a lot of mileage with a bunch of other customers, too.  Y'all
did good.

Thanks,


Thursday, October 26, 2006, 8:56:47 PM, Tripp Allen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TA   
TA  
TA The steps and files  to update 8.22 are located here: 
TA http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-20061026-JH01.htm   Note this will
ONLY work for 8.22.
TA  
TA  
TA  
TA Thanks,
TA  
TA Tripp Allen
TA  
TA Software Development Manager,  Messaging
TA  
TA Ipswitch, Inc.
TA  
TA  

TA   



Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.inetconcepts.net
(972) 788-2364Fax: (972) 788-5049


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] Update for SMTP vulnerability in 8.22...

[Kevin Gillis]

Hi Don,

Good points, well taken!

Overall, our efforts are absolutely concentrated on quality.  The switch to
ICS packaging was not a high point for Ipswitch and the 2006.00 release was
not where it needed to be.  We have concentrated on this for the past 9
months leading up to 2006.1 which we believe addressed the majority of the
reported items, BUT certainly not all.

If there are other issues or parity items (features that existed in 8.22 but
not in 2006.xx), please post here or contact me directly and we'll
prioritize to fix as soon as possible, and possibly we can get some into the
upcoming 2006.2 release.  We demo our work to the public every 30 days and
that's a great forum for customers to shape and prioritize what they want to
see done/fixed.  If you want to participate in these reviews (note: does not
require you to do any installs, just participate via webex), please let
Jason Benton know and he'll send you all the credentials.

The items we are focusing on now for 2006.2 are defects reported through
various forums with a focus on Quality and Performance.  There is always
some amount of infrastructure work and even new customer requested features
being worked on but again Quality and Performance are key areas of focus for
the upcoming release.  Here is a short list.

QUALITY:
SMTP issue
Attachment issues
Web messaging performance
Safari and 64bit OS support
Server issues with External DB - Rename, Add overwrite, global changes
Premium Anti-spam issues

PERFORMANCE:
POP Performance (ability to set limits on how frequently an end user can
POP)
Efficiency (making it easier to do global user deletes and to add a user to
multiple lists/aliases at once)

Bye for now,

kg
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Brown
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 12:30
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Update for SMTP vulnerability in 8.22...

Kevin,

We need a stable release of 2006 with at least the same, working
functionality of 8.22.  We don't care a thing about new racing stripes or
any other gadgets.  Just get us back to square one, so all of us can upgrade
without getting killed by our customers.

It has been about a year and 2006 is neither stable or as functional at
8.22.  Being a small company is not a plausible excuse for this lack of
performance.

FWIW


Saturday, October 28, 2006, 10:06:27 AM, Gil Gomes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
GG    New stuff  How about concentrating on fixing existing 
GG issues.[Snip]

GG -Original Message-
GG From: Kevin Gillis 
GG Sent 10/28/2006 7:19:19 AM
GG To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
GG Subject: [IMail Forum] Update for SMTP vulnerability in 8.22...

GG There is lots of productive work being done on 2006.2 (addressing 
GG issues raised here, in technical support and adding some new stuff) 
GG  



Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.inetconcepts.net
(972) 788-2364Fax: (972) 788-5049


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] Update for SMTP vulnerability in 8.22...

[Kevin Gillis]

Hi Grant,

Yes, we still do them monthly and Jason Benton runs the TPP program.  Once
subscribed, you will receive the webex and 800 number information every 30
days.  Not sure exactly about your account.

Jason, can you please check on Grants status and update his credentials?

Bye for now,

kg 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grant Griffith
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 22:45
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Update for SMTP vulnerability in 8.22...

Kevin,

I used to be notified about these every 30 day demo's, but I have not heard
about them in a few months.  Are they still going on???  If so, why am I not
in the loop anymore?

Thanks,
Grant Griffith
Web Application Developer
Enhanced Telecommunications
http://www.etczone.com
812-932-1000

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Gillis
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 2:16 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Cc: Jason Benton (Jason Benton)
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Update for SMTP vulnerability in 8.22...

Hi Don,

Good points, well taken!

Overall, our efforts are absolutely concentrated on quality.  The switch to
ICS packaging was not a high point for Ipswitch and the 2006.00 release was
not where it needed to be.  We have concentrated on this for the past 9
months leading up to 2006.1 which we believe addressed the majority of the
reported items, BUT certainly not all.

If there are other issues or parity items (features that existed in 8.22 but
not in 2006.xx), please post here or contact me directly and we'll
prioritize to fix as soon as possible, and possibly we can get some into the
upcoming 2006.2 release.  We demo our work to the public every 30 days and
that's a great forum for customers to shape and prioritize what they want to
see done/fixed.  If you want to participate in these reviews (note: does not
require you to do any installs, just participate via webex), please let
Jason Benton know and he'll send you all the credentials.

The items we are focusing on now for 2006.2 are defects reported through
various forums with a focus on Quality and Performance.  There is always
some amount of infrastructure work and even new customer requested features
being worked on but again Quality and Performance are key areas of focus for
the upcoming release.  Here is a short list.

QUALITY:
SMTP issue
Attachment issues
Web messaging performance
Safari and 64bit OS support
Server issues with External DB - Rename, Add overwrite, global changes
Premium Anti-spam issues

PERFORMANCE:
POP Performance (ability to set limits on how frequently an end user can
POP)
Efficiency (making it easier to do global user deletes and to add a user to
multiple lists/aliases at once)

Bye for now,

kg
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Brown
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 12:30
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Update for SMTP vulnerability in 8.22...

Kevin,

We need a stable release of 2006 with at least the same, working
functionality of 8.22.  We don't care a thing about new racing stripes or
any other gadgets.  Just get us back to square one, so all of us can upgrade
without getting killed by our customers.

It has been about a year and 2006 is neither stable or as functional at
8.22.  Being a small company is not a plausible excuse for this lack of
performance.

FWIW


Saturday, October 28, 2006, 10:06:27 AM, Gil Gomes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
GG    New stuff  How about concentrating on fixing existing 
GG issues.[Snip]

GG -Original Message-
GG From: Kevin Gillis 
GG Sent 10/28/2006 7:19:19 AM
GG To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
GG Subject: [IMail Forum] Update for SMTP vulnerability in 8.22...

GG There is lots of productive work being done on 2006.2 (addressing 
GG issues raised here, in technical support and adding some new stuff) 
GG  



Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.inetconcepts.net
(972) 788-2364Fax: (972) 788-5049


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] SMTP Exploit Scanning Going on NOW

[Kevin Gillis]

Hi Darin,

Can you share what the main issues are that you'd like to see resolved
before upgrading to 2006.1?  Chances are that others may share similar
sentiments and we'd like to prioritize and address them.

Bye for now,

kg 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 01:46
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] SMTP Exploit Scanning Going on NOW

Hi Tripp,

Thanks for jumping on this.  Is there an upgrade path from 8.15 to 8.2 for
those with a valid SA, or is it a reinstall?

Any gotchas we should be aware of?

Until a couple of other issues are resolved, we're still not comfortable
with going to 2006.1.

Thanks in advance.

Darin.


- Original Message -
From: Tripp Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 5:13 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] SMTP Exploit Scanning Going on NOW


We are not currently planning a patch for 8.15.  SMTPD was rewritten in 8.2
and I can not confirm (or deny) that 8.1X is vulnerable right now.

Tripp

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Doherty
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 4:35 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] SMTP Exploit Scanning Going on NOW

What about 8.15, Tripp?


- Original Message -
From: Tripp Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 2:02 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] SMTP Exploit Scanning Going on NOW



 2006.1 is not vulnerable to this exploit.

 We are working on a update for 8.22 which will include one DLL that needs
 to
 be copied over the old one during a stop / start of smtpd32. I'll post a
 link here as soon as it's available.

 Tripp


 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
 List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
 Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/



To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow webmail login

[Kevin Gillis]

Title: 2006.1 slow webmail login



hello Bill,

the one change that comes to mind between 2006.1 and 
earlier releases is the disk space indicator which theoretically slows down 
log-in when the disk usage is checked but it should not be substantially, even 
noticeably slower.

is there a login 
account that we can access? 

bye for now,

kg


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity 
HostingSent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 20:55To: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow 
webmail login

and not a single response from anyone at ipswitch to the 
problem we encountered...
Bill Foresman 
Matrosity Hosting 
www.matrosity.com 
850.656.2644 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T 
(Lists)Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 12:04 PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow 
webmail login


I think 
Bill needs to clarify 
from what version he upgraded.

If he upgraded from 
2006.0x then he found a previously unknown bug.

If he upgraded from 
8.x or earlier


John 
T
eServices For 
You

"Seek, and ye shall 
find!"


-Original 
Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Darin CoxSent: Monday, October 23, 2006 6:34 
AMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow 
webmail login


O(k, then there is a problem. 
John?

Darin.





- Original Message - 


From: Matrosity 
Hosting 

To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 


Sent: Monday, 
October 23, 2006 6:31 AM

Subject: RE: [IMail 
Forum] 2006.1 slow webmail login


I'm simply using the 
form as it was intended. If I enter 50 and then select "MB" from the select box 
then it should remain 50. How is MY math wrong?

What about the slow 
login problem which is obviously a bigger problem?
Bill 
Foresman Matrosity Hosting 
www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 






From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists)Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 3:54 
AMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow 
webmail login
Darin, I am surprised 
you did not catch this.

Bills math is 
wrong.

He had 5000 in 
the mail box sizes in the old version which is 50,000,000 BYTES which equals 
47.6837158203125 MBs.

It is stated in the 
old manuals that the mail box sizes are in BYTES. 

This is finally 
clearly FIXED in 9.1.


John 
T
eServices For 
You

"Seek, and ye shall 
find!"


-Original 
Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Darin CoxSent: Sunday, October 22, 2006 10:18 
AMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow 
webmail login


Right, so the calculation problem 
seems to be that the Ipswitch programmers used 1000 instead of 1024. 
Pretty crazy that they would make such a gaffe, but that seems small compared to 
the other issues being reported.

Darin.





- Original Message - 


From: Matrosity 
Hosting 

To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 


Sent: Sunday, 
October 22, 2006 12:25 PM

Subject: RE: [IMail 
Forum] 2006.1 slow webmail login


we had most of our 
clients set to 50 MB's meaning 50 entered into the input box and MB's in the 
selcet box.
Bill 
Foresman Matrosity Hosting 
www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 






From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin CoxSent: Sunday, October 22, 2006 12:16 
PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow 
webmail login

Looks like they're using 1000 
instead of 1024 bytes per K, and K per MB. If 50 is intended to mean 
50,000,000 bytes, instead of a more standard 50 MB = 52,428,800 bytes, it makes 
sense. Note that 50,000,000 bytes is 47.6837158203125 
MB

Darin.





- Original Message - 


From: Matrosity 
Hosting 

To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 


Sent: Sunday, 
October 22, 2006 9:42 AM

Subject: [IMail 
Forum] 2006.1 slow webmail login


Here 
we go again, ipswitch. 
Logins are painfully slow after the 
upgrade to 2006.1. 
After checking around it seems that 
your math is messed up for mailbox account sizes. I normally enter round numbers 
like 50 or 100 for default mailbox sizes. After the upgrade, every single 
account on our system has some ridiculous number like 47.6837158203125 rather 
than 50. So we don't have to wait on an update please have someone write 
something that will correct this ASAP because most of us don't have the time to 
go through and fix every single account in every single domain on our system so 
our customers can actually login in a reasonable amount of 
time.
Bill Foresman 
Matrosity Hosting 
www.matrosity.com 
850.656.2644 

RE: [IMail Forum] Attachment viewing issue

[Kevin Gillis]

Hi Darin,

Yes, completely agree on the production env. Install.  I was just suggesting
it to see if the attachment issue may already be addressed in the upcoming
release.

Regarding the SA, please contact me offline.

Not sure about this one - IMail 9.x no longer passes SMTP AUTH info to
Declude. Are others running into this one?

Bye for now,

kg 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 09:33
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Attachment viewing issue

Hi Kevin,

We can't run demo products in a production environment, and just do not have
time to do field testing for Ipswitch.  I'm sure you can understand that we
can't afford to take the risk of introducing an unstable system to our
customers.  Such a move could quickly drive us out of business when critical
business systems, like email, are involved.

Can you also comment on the unused SA problem?  I just checked our
accounting system and see that we purchased the SA to upgrade last
Thanksgiving, but have been unable to use it due to the loss of Mac/Safari
support in webmail, as well as other stability/feature problems with 9.x,
most of which I believe have been resolved.  If we had known, we simply
would not have purchased the SA.  Now it looks like our SA will expire
before a usable product is available.  I appreciate any input you might have
on this.

In answer to your #2 below, we use Declude and Sniffer.  I don't know
anything about this request for end-user controlled whitelists, but we do
have a related issue.  IMail 9.x no longer passes SMTP AUTH info to Declude.
This is a very important lost feature for us, as we use that to whitelist
outbound email.  This ensures outbound email from our customers is not
filtered for spam, but is still virus scanned.

Darin.


- Original Message -
From: Kevin Gillis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Cc: Jason Benton (Jason Benton) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2006 7:56 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Attachment viewing issue


Hi Darin and Marc,

Sounds like a few topics.

1) Attachment issue with some with some services, but particularly ISPs
Is this a recent issue in 2006.1 or has this been happening for some time
with earlier builds?  We fixed an attachment issue in 2006.2 (next release)
which we can make available to try this out on our demo site to see if that
addresses it.  If we provided credentials, do you have exact steps that we
can try to reproduce on the 2006.2 build?

2) End user controlled white-list is the top end-user request?  What AS are
you using today?

3) Safari support - we completed this work in 2006.2 and it's available on
the demo site if anyone wants to access it.

Bye for now,

kg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Julie Harris
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 13:13
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Attachment viewing Broken - KNOWN ISSUE 2006.1

I've been curious about the Smartermail.  We already use their Stats which
works great!
Temporarily, I'm going to check out the Mailbee Bill Foresman was
recommending.
I love Imail 8.x. It's the web mail that lacks.  We use declude for
filtering which works pretty good...

But does Smartermail have offer the ability for users to 'whitelist' email
addresses without having to be smart enough to figure out the Imail web amil
filtering?  I love my users, but that's their biggest compliant.

Thanks,
Julie

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 12:54 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Attachment viewing Broken - KNOWN ISSUE 2006.1

We just moved to Smarttools SmarterMail after being long time Imail
customers (7 years).  The move was near flawless and we've been extremely
happy with the product.  Funny thing is, we bought the Unlimited version of
the software for not much more than the cost of the SA renewal we let lapse
earlier this year.

Ryan


On Oct 20, 2006, at 7:13 AM, Julie Harris wrote:

 Amen.  My company has been wanting to upgrade to the new one. I've
 been too reluctant.

 Has anyone considered switching from Imail to a different software?
 If so, what have you looked at?

 Thanks,
 Julie

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
 Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 10:03 AM
 To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
 Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Attachment viewing Broken - KNOWN ISSUE
 2006.1

 Wow.  Every time I think we should upgrade using the license we've had
 for a year now someone posts something like this that makes me realize
 we're still better off staying with 8.x.

 Now the problem is that by the time 2006 is truly stable without any
 loss of functionality (e.g. Webmail in Safari and this attachment
 issue), we'll be out of our

RE: [IMail Forum] Attachment viewing issue

[Kevin Gillis]

Hi Darin and Marc,

Sounds like a few topics.

1) Attachment issue with some with some services, but particularly ISPs
Is this a recent issue in 2006.1 or has this been happening for some time
with earlier builds?  We fixed an attachment issue in 2006.2 (next release)
which we can make available to try this out on our demo site to see if that
addresses it.  If we provided credentials, do you have exact steps that we
can try to reproduce on the 2006.2 build?

2) End user controlled white-list is the top end-user request?  What AS are
you using today?

3) Safari support - we completed this work in 2006.2 and it's available on
the demo site if anyone wants to access it.

Bye for now,

kg 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Julie Harris
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 13:13
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Attachment viewing Broken - KNOWN ISSUE 2006.1

I've been curious about the Smartermail.  We already use their Stats which
works great!
Temporarily, I'm going to check out the Mailbee Bill Foresman was
recommending.
I love Imail 8.x. It's the web mail that lacks.  We use declude for
filtering which works pretty good...

But does Smartermail have offer the ability for users to 'whitelist' email
addresses without having to be smart enough to figure out the Imail web amil
filtering?  I love my users, but that's their biggest compliant.

Thanks,
Julie

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 12:54 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Attachment viewing Broken - KNOWN ISSUE 2006.1

We just moved to Smarttools SmarterMail after being long time Imail
customers (7 years).  The move was near flawless and we've been extremely
happy with the product.  Funny thing is, we bought the Unlimited version of
the software for not much more than the cost of the SA renewal we let lapse
earlier this year.

Ryan


On Oct 20, 2006, at 7:13 AM, Julie Harris wrote:

 Amen.  My company has been wanting to upgrade to the new one. I've 
 been too reluctant.

 Has anyone considered switching from Imail to a different software?  
 If so, what have you looked at?

 Thanks,
 Julie

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
 Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 10:03 AM
 To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
 Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Attachment viewing Broken - KNOWN ISSUE
 2006.1

 Wow.  Every time I think we should upgrade using the license we've had 
 for a year now someone posts something like this that makes me realize 
 we're still better off staying with 8.x.

 Now the problem is that by the time 2006 is truly stable without any 
 loss of functionality (e.g. Webmail in Safari and this attachment 
 issue), we'll be out of our SA purchased last October.

 Kevin G.  Do you have any input on this?

 Darin.


 - Original Message -
 From: Marc Catuogno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
 Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 9:30 AM
 Subject: [IMail Forum] Attachment viewing Broken - KNOWN ISSUE 2006.1


 I called Ipswitch last week and added my name to the list of people 
 complaining about a known issue of any attachments forwarded from 
 places like AOL, Yahoo, and Hotmail showing up as .txt attachments 
 with no way of getting the real attachment out of this .txt file.

 This is a very, very aggravating issue and it is ridiculous that it is 
 taking them this long to fix what I consider basic Email client 
 functionality.

 I want someone from Ipswitch to acknowledge this on list and give us 
 an estimated time of repair.

 Marc

 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
 List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%
 40list.ipswitch.com/
 Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
 List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%
 40list.ipswitch.com/
 Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
 List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%
 40list.ipswitch.com/
 Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] Japanese characters revisited

[Kevin Gillis]

Hello Jonas,

Support for 2022-JP has been implemented and is viewable on 
our live demo server (contact me for credentials if you wish to access). 
It will be officially released as part of the 2006.2 release (release data tbd 
but in the coming months).

bye for now,

kg


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonas 
FornanderSent: Friday, October 06, 2006 00:55To: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] Japanese 
characters revisited

Has ISO-2022-JP been released yet?
Jonas 
Fornander System 
Administrator Netwood Communications,LLC Tel: 
310-442-1530 Fax: 310-820-3125 "Find Out Why We're Better" * Now offering Fiber Optic Internet service 
throughout the 
continental USA. Speeds start at 5Mbps/2Mbps. Go to www.netwood.net and fill in a prequal request. * "Home is where my computer 
is" 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin 
GillisSent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 5:57 PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comCc: Jason BentonSubject: RE: 
[IMail Forum] Japanese characters revisited

Hello 
Jonas,

We are 
currently working on adding ISO-2022-JP supportto web messagingand 
plan to demo it at the upcoming technical preview programin 2 weeks. 
Feel free to contact Jason to sign up for the TPP program. We are working 
on a date by which this will be released to all.

Bye 
for now,

kg

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Jonas 
  FornanderSent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 18:42To: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] Japanese 
  characters revisited
  
  I while ago I posted an issue with Japanese characters 
  when using webmail.
  I have some more info from the client now. Does anyone 
  know how I can solve this issue. 
  It's fairly important so any help isreally 
  appreciated.
  
  quote
  I tried sending emails from the webmail, and they were 
  garbled, but I changed the encoding to Shift-JIS, then they are 
  readable.Every time one of our clients gets email from web mail, they have 
  to change the encoding in mail software.This is the problem for the 
  client. And they are thinking the problem is crucial. I checked content-type in the header, and the 
  charset was ISO-8859-1. It is not for 
  Japanese character, I guess this is the cause of the problem. Usually Japanese email uses ISO-2022-JP. It 
  is safest way to send an email in Japanese. 
  Shift JIS is 8bit, so mail software can't handle the encoding 
  well. And actually Shift-JIS can't 
  handle ASCII. On the other hand, 
  ISO-2022-JP is 7bit and can handle ASCII. 
  
  Do you think it is easily possible to change the 
  encoding to ISO-2022-JP from Shift-JIS when the software sends emails in 
  Japanese?
  /quote
  
  Jonas 
  Fornander System 
  Administrator Netwood Communications,LLC Tel: 
  310-442-1530 Fax: 310-820-3125 "Find Out Why We're Better" * Now offering Fiber Optic Internet service throughout the continental USA. Speeds start at 5Mbps/2Mbps. 
  Go to www.netwood.net and fill in a prequal 
  request. * "Home is where my computer 
  is"
  

RE: [IMail Forum] Japanese characters revisited

[Kevin Gillis]

Hello Jonas,

At this time, there are no plans to update 8.22 with 
2022-JP support.

bye for now,

kg


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonas 
FornanderSent: Friday, October 06, 2006 16:08To: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] Japanese 
characters revisited

Will there be an available update for 
8.22?
Jonas 
Fornander System 
Administrator Netwood Communications,LLC Tel: 
310-442-1530 Fax: 310-820-3125 "Find Out Why We're Better" * Now offering Fiber Optic Internet service 
throughout the 
continental USA. Speeds start at 5Mbps/2Mbps. Go to www.netwood.net and fill in a prequal request. * "Home is where my computer 
is" 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin 
GillisSent: Friday, October 06, 2006 4:55 AMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] Japanese 
characters revisited

Hello Jonas,

Support for 2022-JP has been implemented and is viewable on 
our live demo server (contact me for credentials if you wish to access). 
It will be officially released as part of the 2006.2 release (release data tbd 
but in the coming months).

bye for now,

kg


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonas 
FornanderSent: Friday, October 06, 2006 00:55To: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] Japanese 
characters revisited

Has ISO-2022-JP been released yet?
Jonas 
Fornander System 
Administrator Netwood Communications,LLC Tel: 
310-442-1530 Fax: 310-820-3125 "Find Out Why We're Better" * Now offering Fiber Optic Internet service 
throughout the 
continental USA. Speeds start at 5Mbps/2Mbps. Go to www.netwood.net and fill in a prequal request. * "Home is where my computer 
is" 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin 
GillisSent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 5:57 PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comCc: Jason BentonSubject: RE: 
[IMail Forum] Japanese characters revisited

Hello 
Jonas,

We are 
currently working on adding ISO-2022-JP supportto web messagingand 
plan to demo it at the upcoming technical preview programin 2 weeks. 
Feel free to contact Jason to sign up for the TPP program. We are working 
on a date by which this will be released to all.

Bye 
for now,

kg

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Jonas 
  FornanderSent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 18:42To: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] Japanese 
  characters revisited
  
  I while ago I posted an issue with Japanese characters 
  when using webmail.
  I have some more info from the client now. Does anyone 
  know how I can solve this issue. 
  It's fairly important so any help isreally 
  appreciated.
  
  quote
  I tried sending emails from the webmail, and they were 
  garbled, but I changed the encoding to Shift-JIS, then they are 
  readable.Every time one of our clients gets email from web mail, they have 
  to change the encoding in mail software.This is the problem for the 
  client. And they are thinking the problem is crucial. I checked content-type in the header, and the 
  charset was ISO-8859-1. It is not for 
  Japanese character, I guess this is the cause of the problem. Usually Japanese email uses ISO-2022-JP. It 
  is safest way to send an email in Japanese. 
  Shift JIS is 8bit, so mail software can't handle the encoding 
  well. And actually Shift-JIS can't 
  handle ASCII. On the other hand, 
  ISO-2022-JP is 7bit and can handle ASCII. 
  
  Do you think it is easily possible to change the 
  encoding to ISO-2022-JP from Shift-JIS when the software sends emails in 
  Japanese?
  /quote
  
  Jonas 
  Fornander System 
  Administrator Netwood Communications,LLC Tel: 
  310-442-1530 Fax: 310-820-3125 "Find Out Why We're Better" * Now offering Fiber Optic Internet service throughout the continental USA. Speeds start at 5Mbps/2Mbps. 
  Go to www.netwood.net and fill in a prequal 
  request. * "Home is where my computer 
  is"
  

RE: [IMail Forum] Webmail Issues...

[Kevin Gillis]

Hi all,

good input.

as it turns out, all 3 of the below are marked to be 
addressed in the upcoming sprint. We believe the auto-refresh may be IE 
specific but are digging into this to better understand. we have also made 
changes to address this issue as well.

4) 
Performance issues... Webmail can be painfully slow opening a folder if it 
contains more than a few hundred emails... 

i will check into the others (attachment issues, email, 
double space on Enter). 

Gil, any more details on this one?

3) 
This error... I'm not sure what's causing this, but I'm seeing a lot of 
emails that pop this screen up... 

bye for now,

kg




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc 
CatuognoSent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 09:00To: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] Webmail 
Issues... 


Please dont 
forget:

HTML links arent 
clickable if the message is composed in Plain Text

Email signature doesnt 
show up in replies or forwards

The auto-refresh steals 
the focus and the message you are working on 
reduces







From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Gil GomesSent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 8:20 
AMTo: 
IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] Webmail Issues... 



Is Ipswitch planning to ever 
correct the myriad of problems with WebMail? For instance... 

1) 
Webmail can't seem to read the filename of some attachments. The filename 
comes up in webmail as "download.aspx"
2) 
When you hit enter at the end of a line, you get a double space. If you 
hit CtrlEnter you're all set... 
Bizarre.
3) 
This error... I'm not sure what's causing this, but I'm seeing a lot of 
emails that pop this screen up... 


4) 
Performance issues... Webmail can be painfully slow opening a folder if it 
contains more than a few hundred emails... 

RE: [IMail Forum] Non-HTML e-mail has no links in 2006.1

[Kevin Gillis]

Hi John,

We're looking at revisiting this issue in the next sprint.  

Some admins want all links disabled (even in rich html) as a
security/anti-phishing pre-caution but completely understand the parity
issue (used to work one way but no longer does).

Bye for now,

kg 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John E. Richardson
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 11:04
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Non-HTML e-mail has no links in 2006.1

Is there anything further on this?

I also have users that are unable to click links in their mail as well. The
links were clickable as expected in 8.2 but are not since the move to
2006.1 about a month ago.


Thanks,

John Richardson

 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Catuogno
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 11:45 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Non-HTML e-mail has no links in 2006.1

If any of your Webmail users are getting any list or newsletter e-mail that
is sent in plain text, the links are not clickable. I've been told that even
when the text has the proper anchor tags, the links are just plain text.

I think this was a bit short sighted and should be fixed.  I try to convince
all my users to send in plain text whenever possible, now when they do their
links don't work

Marc

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] Does this sound fair?

[Kevin Gillis]

Hi Will

Thanks for the feedback.

Regarding this, are you looking for a default in 
which all deleted maildoes not go into the Deleted Folder and is 
permanently deleted? Also, can the defaultbe changed by the end user 
or is this a persistent default set by the admin per 
domain?

"I am no longer waiting 
for fixes per se, but I am looking forward to Default user preferences for web 
messaging to avoid an issue where users deleted items folder fills up to their 
maximum account size."

bye for now,

kg


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
WillSent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 15:56To: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] Does this 
sound fair?


I was one of the 
original users to unfortunately upgrade to 2006 when it came out. I did 
eventually upgrade from 8.22 to 2006.04a successfully. I did have a hiccup 
and needed to verify system permissions to my user folders and Imail registry 
values so users could change their preferences and rules, but after that it ran 
as advertised.

I am currently running 
2006.1 without issue and would say that my mail is running smoother than 
ever. Customers are now used to the new web interface so we no longer 
receive complaints about that either. It is nice to have the mailbox size 
indicator back with 2006.1 and they fixed the issue with orphaned mail in the 
spool folder.

I am no longer waiting 
for fixes per se, but I am looking forward to Default user preferences for web 
messaging to avoid an issue where users deleted items folder fills up to their 
maximum account size.

I believe your service 
agreement entitles you to your upgrade as long as it was valid upon release, so 
if it has expired recently, you should still be entitled to 2006 and all its 
patches.

Will


-Original 
Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Stephen 
GulukSent: Wednesday, 
September 20, 2006 3:18 PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] Does this sound 
fair?


How many people have yet to upgrade? I've 
not seen sufficient messages in this forum saying the iMail 2006 is as stable as 
my current version 8.22.











The following is my response to an 
advertising email to renew my service agreement from 
ipswitch:







To be honest, us loyal customers that 
extended our service agreements for another year but never got a full year of 
new working stable software should be compensated.

I paid for iMail 2006 but never installed 
it because it has yet to reach stable levels. Personally I am very unhappy that 
ipswitch looked the other way and took our money without ever compensating 
anyone for the false advertising of a product as stable and ready for production 
when it was not We should all get another year of service contract without 
having to pay twice for what has not yet been 
provided...





On Sep 20, 2006, at 11:17 AM, Yana Fookson 
wrote:

Thank you for your 
email.

There were various bugs in the IMail 
Server that was released in December of 
2005.

However the minor release of 2006.1 has 
been in development since last December, and was released early September 
2006.

This proves, and we are confident that 
this is a much more stable, reliable, user friendly version of IMail 
Server.

What's been done to 
2006.1:

-Improved performance in the Queue 
Manager and Web Messaging, now up to 50% Faster

- Added Active Directory 
support

-Improvements to web messaging 
including personal groups, streamlined address book management and 
more

-Improved public contacts 
list

-Improved SMTPD performance and 
more


I would recommend trying out a free 
trial evaluation of the IMail Server 2006.1 and see the difference for 
yourself.


Please let me know if I can be of any 
further help!


Thank 
you,



Regards,





Steve 
Guluk

SGDesign

(949) 
661-9333

ICQ: 
7230769

RE: [IMail Forum] Priority/Importance Flag?

[Kevin Gillis]

 Hi John,

Thanks for the request which I've incremented in the feature backlog - we do
have a few requests for this in the backlog. We're collecting requirements
for the next release so thanks for sending.

BTW - Another relegated to the message list is being able to mark a message
as read/unread which has a handful more requests.  

Bye for now,

kg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John E. Richardson
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 11:33
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Priority/Importance Flag?

Is there a plan to add a flag to future WebMail upgrades which will allow
messages to be marked as high or low priority or importance levels?

I've had some users inquire about it. Just thought I'd see if it was on the
radar.


Thanks,

John

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] Imail 2006.1 Webmail - Macintosh/safari?

[Kevin Gillis]

Hello Darin,

Thanks for your feedback and yes, Safari is a bit cantankerous.  Firefox/Mac
has been okay but not Safari.  

It turns out we just fixed (in the last few business days) the last known
issue with Safari.  We were going to demo at the last IMail Sprint last week
but webex and Safari do not get along!

This will be released in 2006.2.  We will have it up and running on
webdemo.ipswitch.com in the coming weeks and you can contact me offline to
gain access and use.  By the way, what version of Safari are you using?

General Availability is still being set for the 2006.2 release.

Bye for now,

kg 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 15:38
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Imail 2006.1 Webmail - Macintosh/safari?

Kevin,

Safari support is critical to us due to a significant population of Mac
users.  We have not been able to upgrade via our November 2005 purchase due
to that.  In fact, we would not have made our November purchase if we had
known we could not upgrade due to lack of support for Mac users.  I had
really hoped the urgency would be understood and we would see Safari support
by now.  I certainly expected it in 2006.1

Please consider expediting this support.  We would be extremely disappointed
to find out that our purchase last year was completely wasted due to the
loss of Mac support, which is sounds like may not be added until after our
maintenance contract expires.

We appreciate the consideration.

Darin.


- Original Message -
From: Kevin Gillis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 9:34 AM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Imail 2006.1 Webmail - Macintosh/safari?


Hi All,

Yes, we have added Safari support (all but the rich text editor) in the last
sprint.  This will be available in an expert user program in sept/oct and to
the general public in the next release.

Bye for now,

kg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grant Griffith -
IMail List
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 09:00
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Imail 2006.1 Webmail - Macintosh/safari?

Nope, that is supposedly the next release

Grant


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike N
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 8:48 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Imail 2006.1 Webmail - Macintosh/safari?

Does the latest 2006 work with the Macintosh/Safari browser?

   We now have the maibox size indicator, so we may be able to proceed with
the upgrade to 2006.1.

  Thanks,

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/



To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] Imail 2006.1 Webmail - Macintosh/safari?

[Kevin Gillis]

Hi All,

Yes, we have added Safari support (all but the rich text editor) in the last
sprint.  This will be available in an expert user program in sept/oct and to
the general public in the next release.

Bye for now,

kg 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grant Griffith -
IMail List
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 09:00
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Imail 2006.1 Webmail - Macintosh/safari?

Nope, that is supposedly the next release

Grant


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike N
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 8:48 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Imail 2006.1 Webmail - Macintosh/safari?

Does the latest 2006 work with the Macintosh/Safari browser?

   We now have the maibox size indicator, so we may be able to proceed with
the upgrade to 2006.1.

  Thanks,

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/



To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 quietly released

[Kevin Gillis]

Hi All,

Yes, we provide patches only for the current major release.

Any customer who was eligible for 2006 will be given entitled to 2006.1.

Bye for now,

kg 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Reimer
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 11:24
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 quietly released

My understanding from the Ipswitch tech is that they would not be releasing
a patch for 8.22. I believe somewhere on the Ipswitch web site it states
that they will not release patches for an older version 90 days after a new
version is released. This is my understanding but maybe Kevin can chime in
and give us an official word.

Mark Reimer
IT Project Manager
American CareSource
214-596-2464


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of kztechinfo -
cribellum
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 10:15 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 quietly released

So did they say there would be a patch for 8.22 versions or must we upgrade
to 2006.1?  I let my support agreement expire this summer because I was not
sure if I was going to continue on with Imail.  Do I have to renew in order
to get 2006.1 which is not vulnerable?  I have a lot of Mac users, would
only the Safari users be affected by the web interface?

Keith Zwick


- Original Message -
From: Mark Reimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 10:59 AM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 quietly released


I spoke with an Ipswitch Tech who indicated that versions prior to 2006 are
 vulnerable to the new issue. I upgraded last week to 2006.1 from 8.22
 without any problems.

 Mark Reimer
 IT Project Manager
 American CareSource
 214-596-2464

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert
 Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 9:02 AM
 To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
 Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 quietly released

 A followup here would be nice... anyone..

 // Robert

 Kevin Bilbee wrote:

This is one I would like to know about we are on 8.22.


Does this issue effect older versions?


Kevin Bilbee



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike N
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 12:15 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 quietly released

 Fixed a vulnerability that allowed remote attackers to execute
arbitrary code within the SMTP daemon.

  Is the 8.22 version also vulnerable?   A number of us have been
forced to
hold off migration to Imail 2006 until it is ready.

- Original Message -


Well, I see that 2006.1 has been quietly released.  I hope it was
worth waiting for...


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-
archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/





To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/





 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
 List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
 Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/



 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
 List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
 Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

 

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/



To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] Bitdefender stopped updating

[Kevin Gillis]

Hi all,

I will follow up and find out what is available for these customers.  But
note, whether it's AV from Symantec or AV, if you don't have an active
Service Agreement, you no longer receive updates.

In the meantime, if you have ICS Standard, contact me offline and we'll make
sure this is resolved the right way.

Bye for now,

kg 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Schaible
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 05:23
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: AW: [IMail Forum] Bitdefender stopped updating

Hi Kevin,

Wrong answer! We have a expiration date on milk and orange juice, but not on
software.

Your statement is just not acceptable.


-- 
 
Mit freundlichen Grüssen


Merlin Consulting
Martin Schaible
Bahnhofstrasse 27
CH-8702 Zollikon

Phone:   +41 44 391 30 00
Fax: +41 44 391 32 49

Mail:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL: http://www.merlinconsulting.ch
Support: http://support.merlinconsulting.ch

GPS: N47 20.235 E8 34.226

News - Neue Produkte:

.:. NOD32 Antivirus System
.:. BlueDragon
.:. Kiwi Syslog Monitor
.:. Paessler GmbH
.:. Sawmill Loganalyzer
.:. SmarterTools
  

 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
 Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Kevin 
 Gillis
 Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. September 2006 05:25
 An: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
 Betreff: RE: [IMail Forum] Bitdefender stopped updating
 
 Hello All,
 
 Not sure whey they stopped specifically in June - We
 (Ipswitch) stopped
 selling BitDefender in 2005. 
 
 To receive updates, you will have to contact SoftWIN directly - 
 http://www.bitdefender.com/
 
 Bye for now,
 
 kg
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin 
 Schaible
 Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 11:52
 To: Ipswitch IMail Mailing List
 Subject: [IMail Forum] Bitdefender stopped updating
 
 Hi,
 
 Bitdefender aka Antivirus Standard for Imail made the last update 
 26. of june 2006. The log says, the no more actual signatures are 
 available. I can't believe, that the company didn't release new 
 signatures since then. I think, that bitdefender does no more support 
 the oem version for Imail.
 
 Does anybody made the same experience? Could Ipswitch make a statement 
 about this?
 
 Thanks.
 
 --
  
 Mit freundlichen Grüssen
 
 
 Merlin Consulting
 Martin Schaible
 Bahnhofstrasse 27
 CH-8702 Zollikon
 
 Phone:   +41 44 391 30 00
 Fax: +41 44 391 32 49
 
 Mail:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 URL: http://www.merlinconsulting.ch
 Support: http://support.merlinconsulting.ch
 
 GPS: N47 20.235 E8 34.226
 
 News - Neue Produkte:
 
 .:. NOD32 Antivirus System
 .:. BlueDragon
 .:. Kiwi Syslog Monitor
 .:. Paessler GmbH
 .:. Sawmill Loganalyzer
 .:. SmarterTools
 
 
 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
 List Archive: 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
 Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
 
 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
 List Archive: 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
 Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
 

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] Bitdefender stopped updating

[Kevin Gillis]

Hi All,

I'm in touch to find out what's going on as well.

Bye for now,

kg 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Schaible
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 10:33
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: AW: [IMail Forum] Bitdefender stopped updating

Hi, 

I opened a ticket a bitdefender. They gave me a new url, which does not work
either.
I'll keep you posted.



-- 
 
Mit freundlichen Grüssen


Merlin Consulting
Martin Schaible
Bahnhofstrasse 27
CH-8702 Zollikon

Phone:   +41 44 391 30 00
Fax: +41 44 391 32 49

Mail:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL: http://www.merlinconsulting.ch
Support: http://support.merlinconsulting.ch

GPS: N47 20.235 E8 34.226

News - Neue Produkte:

.:. NOD32 Antivirus System
.:. BlueDragon
.:. Kiwi Syslog Monitor
.:. Paessler GmbH
.:. Sawmill Loganalyzer
.:. SmarterTools
  

 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
 Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von L. 
 Bhandari
 Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. September 2006 16:26
 An: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
 Betreff: RE: [IMail Forum] Bitdefender stopped updating
 
 
 Thank you for noticing that Martin. I had not even noticed that it 
 wasn'
 updating :(
 
 Kevin, I look forward to hearing what you find out for us.
 
 In the meantime, I found this -- so we can update manually...
 http://kb.bitdefender.com/KB91-en--How-to-update-BitDefender-f
 or-Windows-Mai
 l-Servers-using-cumulative.zip.html
 
 ~Laura
  
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin 
 Schaible
 Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 5:23 AM
 To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
 Subject: AW: [IMail Forum] Bitdefender stopped updating
 
 Hi Kevin,
 
 Wrong answer! We have a expiration date on milk and orange juice, but 
 not on software.
 
 Your statement is just not acceptable.
 
 
 --
  
 Mit freundlichen Grüssen
 
 
 Merlin Consulting
 Martin Schaible
 Bahnhofstrasse 27
 CH-8702 Zollikon
 
 Phone:   +41 44 391 30 00
 Fax: +41 44 391 32 49
 
 Mail:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 URL: http://www.merlinconsulting.ch
 Support: http://support.merlinconsulting.ch
 
 GPS: N47 20.235 E8 34.226
 
 News - Neue Produkte:
 
 .:. NOD32 Antivirus System
 .:. BlueDragon
 .:. Kiwi Syslog Monitor
 .:. Paessler GmbH
 .:. Sawmill Loganalyzer
 .:. SmarterTools
 
 
  -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
  Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Kevin 
  Gillis
  Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. September 2006 05:25
  An: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
  Betreff: RE: [IMail Forum] Bitdefender stopped updating
  
  Hello All,
  
  Not sure whey they stopped specifically in June - We
  (Ipswitch) stopped
  selling BitDefender in 2005. 
  
  To receive updates, you will have to contact SoftWIN directly - 
  http://www.bitdefender.com/
  
  Bye for now,
  
  kg
  
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin 
  Schaible
  Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 11:52
  To: Ipswitch IMail Mailing List
  Subject: [IMail Forum] Bitdefender stopped updating
  
  Hi,
  
  Bitdefender aka Antivirus Standard for Imail made the last update 
  26. of june 2006. The log says, the no more actual signatures are 
  available. I can't believe, that the company didn't release new 
  signatures since then. I think, that bitdefender does no more 
  support the oem version for Imail.
  
  Does anybody made the same experience? Could Ipswitch make a 
  statement about this?
  
  Thanks.
  
  --
   
  Mit freundlichen Grüssen
  
  
  Merlin Consulting
  Martin Schaible
  Bahnhofstrasse 27
  CH-8702 Zollikon
  
  Phone:   +41 44 391 30 00
  Fax: +41 44 391 32 49
  
  Mail:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  URL: http://www.merlinconsulting.ch
  Support: http://support.merlinconsulting.ch
  
  GPS: N47 20.235 E8 34.226
  
  News - Neue Produkte:
  
  .:. NOD32 Antivirus System
  .:. BlueDragon
  .:. Kiwi Syslog Monitor
  .:. Paessler GmbH
  .:. Sawmill Loganalyzer
  .:. SmarterTools
  
  
  To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
  List Archive: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
  Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
  
  To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
  List Archive: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
  Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
  
 
 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
 List Archive: 
 http://www.mail

RE: [IMail Forum] Bitdefender stopped updating

[Kevin Gillis]

Hello Martin,

Correct, you can not purchase a service agreement for just AV Standard.  But
if you purchase an agreement of ICS Standard, that covers one year of
updates.   But note, the AV was pulled out of ICS Standard over 1 year ago.


Without an SA, the Antivirus will continue to work/run but you no longer
will receive updates.  This is how AV/AS (any vendor who delivers daily
updates) provides their service.  Otherwise, if customers could pay once and
then have signatures delivered in perpetuity by the security vendor, the
security vendor would have a problem;-)

Bye for now,

kg 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Schaible
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 06:26
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: AW: [IMail Forum] Bitdefender stopped updating

Hi Kevin,

For AV Standard, no service agreement is or was available and this has
nothing to do with the update of the signatures. The Software does not need
any login data to get the newest signatures. So, it should work. I think,
that bitdefender does not update the url
http://upgrade2.bitdefender.com/update7  anymore.



-- 
 
Mit freundlichen Grüssen


Merlin Consulting
Martin Schaible
Bahnhofstrasse 27
CH-8702 Zollikon

Phone:   +41 44 391 30 00
Fax: +41 44 391 32 49

Mail:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL: http://www.merlinconsulting.ch
Support: http://support.merlinconsulting.ch

GPS: N47 20.235 E8 34.226

News - Neue Produkte:

.:. NOD32 Antivirus System
.:. BlueDragon
.:. Kiwi Syslog Monitor
.:. Paessler GmbH
.:. Sawmill Loganalyzer
.:. SmarterTools
  

 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
 Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Kevin 
 Gillis
 Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. September 2006 12:13
 An: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
 Betreff: RE: [IMail Forum] Bitdefender stopped updating
 
 Hi all,
 
 I will follow up and find out what is available for these customers.  
 But note, whether it's AV from Symantec or AV, if you don't have an 
 active Service Agreement, you no longer receive updates.
 
 In the meantime, if you have ICS Standard, contact me offline and 
 we'll make sure this is resolved the right way.
 
 Bye for now,
 
 kg
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin 
 Schaible
 Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 05:23
 To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
 Subject: AW: [IMail Forum] Bitdefender stopped updating
 
 Hi Kevin,
 
 Wrong answer! We have a expiration date on milk and orange juice, but 
 not on software.
 
 Your statement is just not acceptable.
 
 
 --
  
 Mit freundlichen Grüssen
 
 
 Merlin Consulting
 Martin Schaible
 Bahnhofstrasse 27
 CH-8702 Zollikon
 
 Phone:   +41 44 391 30 00
 Fax: +41 44 391 32 49
 
 Mail:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 URL: http://www.merlinconsulting.ch
 Support: http://support.merlinconsulting.ch
 
 GPS: N47 20.235 E8 34.226
 
 News - Neue Produkte:
 
 .:. NOD32 Antivirus System
 .:. BlueDragon
 .:. Kiwi Syslog Monitor
 .:. Paessler GmbH
 .:. Sawmill Loganalyzer
 .:. SmarterTools
 
 
  -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
  Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Kevin 
  Gillis
  Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. September 2006 05:25
  An: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
  Betreff: RE: [IMail Forum] Bitdefender stopped updating
  
  Hello All,
  
  Not sure whey they stopped specifically in June - We
  (Ipswitch) stopped
  selling BitDefender in 2005. 
  
  To receive updates, you will have to contact SoftWIN directly - 
  http://www.bitdefender.com/
  
  Bye for now,
  
  kg
  
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin 
  Schaible
  Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 11:52
  To: Ipswitch IMail Mailing List
  Subject: [IMail Forum] Bitdefender stopped updating
  
  Hi,
  
  Bitdefender aka Antivirus Standard for Imail made the last update 
  26. of june 2006. The log says, the no more actual signatures are 
  available. I can't believe, that the company didn't release new 
  signatures since then. I think, that bitdefender does no
 more support
  the oem version for Imail.
  
  Does anybody made the same experience? Could Ipswitch make
 a statement
  about this?
  
  Thanks.
  
  --
   
  Mit freundlichen Grüssen
  
  
  Merlin Consulting
  Martin Schaible
  Bahnhofstrasse 27
  CH-8702 Zollikon
  
  Phone:   +41 44 391 30 00
  Fax: +41 44 391 32 49
  
  Mail:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  URL: http://www.merlinconsulting.ch
  Support: http://support.merlinconsulting.ch
  
  GPS: N47 20.235 E8 34.226
  
  News - Neue

RE: [IMail Forum] Bitdefender stopped updating

[Kevin Gillis]

Hello Martin,

I'm still confirming but updates should be running until November.  

They have not shut off in the past for business reasons - an extension was
offered as a form of compensation for discontinuing the solution.
Otherwise, they would discontinue when your SA expires.

For example, the Symantec AV and the Premium Anti-Spam both expire without
when your SA expires.

More updates soon.

Bye for now,

kg 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Schaible
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 17:35
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: AW: [IMail Forum] Bitdefender stopped updating

Hi Kevin,

I think, the information you posted is wrong.

The SA for AV Standard has nothing to do updating process of the signatures.
Without an SA the update of the signatures worked over the last years
without any interruption.

I don't anybody who bought an SA for AV Standard ever. We never sold one to
our customers. I'm think an SA was never available, at least not in my area.
Also the software was never updated, the software is on the same release
like in 2004. 

IF somebody would own an SA for AV Standard, how would it work? AV Standard
has no serialisation process, nothing. AV Standard  is a simple software,
only a bunch of files. If an SA was available, it was a placebo.

The signature update worked until 26 of june (without an SA) until somebody
pressed a button. I think, that somebody at Bitdefender realized, that the
oem contract with Ipswitch is no longer valid and this was the reason to
shutdown the update.

I have no problem to pay a fee for the regular update of the signatures. I
have problems to accept, that the update of the signatures was terminated
without any announcement. And i have problems to accept angry customers.
Anti-Virus protection is important. The only reason we didn't realize this
earlier is, that we use AV on our FireWall and an additional Scanner in
mxGuard.  


-- 
 
Mit freundlichen Grüssen


Merlin Consulting
Martin Schaible
Bahnhofstrasse 27
CH-8702 Zollikon

Phone:   +41 44 391 30 00
Fax: +41 44 391 32 49

Mail:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL: http://www.merlinconsulting.ch
Support: http://support.merlinconsulting.ch

GPS: N47 20.235 E8 34.226

News - Neue Produkte:

.:. NOD32 Antivirus System
.:. BlueDragon
.:. Kiwi Syslog Monitor
.:. Paessler GmbH
.:. Sawmill Loganalyzer
.:. SmarterTools
  

 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
 Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Kevin 
 Gillis
 Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. September 2006 22:18
 An: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
 Betreff: RE: [IMail Forum] Bitdefender stopped updating
 
 Hello Martin,
 
 Correct, you can not purchase a service agreement for just AV 
 Standard.  But if you purchase an agreement of ICS Standard, that 
 covers one year of
 updates.   But note, the AV was pulled out of ICS Standard 
 over 1 year ago.
 
 
 Without an SA, the Antivirus will continue to work/run but you no 
 longer will receive updates.  This is how AV/AS (any vendor who 
 delivers daily
 updates) provides their service.  Otherwise, if customers could pay 
 once and then have signatures delivered in perpetuity by the security 
 vendor, the security vendor would have a problem;-)
 
 Bye for now,
 
 kg
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin 
 Schaible
 Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 06:26
 To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
 Subject: AW: [IMail Forum] Bitdefender stopped updating
 
 Hi Kevin,
 
 For AV Standard, no service agreement is or was available and this has 
 nothing to do with the update of the signatures. The Software does not 
 need any login data to get the newest signatures. So, it should work. 
 I think, that bitdefender does not update the url
 http://upgrade2.bitdefender.com/update7  anymore.
 
 
 
 -- 
  
 Mit freundlichen Grüssen
 
 
 Merlin Consulting
 Martin Schaible
 Bahnhofstrasse 27
 CH-8702 Zollikon
 
 Phone:   +41 44 391 30 00
 Fax: +41 44 391 32 49
 
 Mail:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 URL: http://www.merlinconsulting.ch
 Support: http://support.merlinconsulting.ch
 
 GPS: N47 20.235 E8 34.226
 
 News - Neue Produkte:
 
 .:. NOD32 Antivirus System
 .:. BlueDragon
 .:. Kiwi Syslog Monitor
 .:. Paessler GmbH
 .:. Sawmill Loganalyzer
 .:. SmarterTools
   
 
  -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
  Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Kevin 
  Gillis
  Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. September 2006 12:13
  An: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
  Betreff: RE: [IMail Forum] Bitdefender stopped updating
  
  Hi all,
  
  I will follow up and find out what is available for these 
 customers

RE: [IMail Forum] Bitdefender stopped updating

[Kevin Gillis]

Hello All,

Not sure whey they stopped specifically in June - We (Ipswitch) stopped
selling BitDefender in 2005. 

To receive updates, you will have to contact SoftWIN directly -
http://www.bitdefender.com/

Bye for now,

kg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Schaible
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 11:52
To: Ipswitch IMail Mailing List
Subject: [IMail Forum] Bitdefender stopped updating

Hi,

Bitdefender aka Antivirus Standard for Imail made the last update 26. of
june 2006. The log says, the no more actual signatures are available. I
can't believe, that the company didn't release new signatures since then. I
think, that bitdefender does no more support the oem version for Imail.

Does anybody made the same experience? Could Ipswitch make a statement about
this? 

Thanks.

-- 
 
Mit freundlichen Grüssen


Merlin Consulting
Martin Schaible
Bahnhofstrasse 27
CH-8702 Zollikon

Phone:   +41 44 391 30 00
Fax: +41 44 391 32 49

Mail:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL: http://www.merlinconsulting.ch
Support: http://support.merlinconsulting.ch

GPS: N47 20.235 E8 34.226

News - Neue Produkte:

.:. NOD32 Antivirus System
.:. BlueDragon
.:. Kiwi Syslog Monitor
.:. Paessler GmbH
.:. Sawmill Loganalyzer
.:. SmarterTools
 

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Release Update?

[Kevin Gillis]

Title: Message



Hello David,

IMail/ICS 2006.1 releases next Wednesday, Sept 6. 


Ipswitch has been running in live production 
forapproximately6 weeks and Expert Users have been running for 
approximately 4 weeks.

bye for now,

kg


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David 
PenroseSent: Friday, September 01, 2006 12:44To: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Release 
Update?

Will moderator 
please provide an update on the release of 2006.1?

Thx.

_
David Penrose
Top Network 
LLC
360.392.0467

Seattle
206.529.4128 v
206.202.3776 f

RE: [IMail Forum] Premium Antispam does not catch much spam

[Kevin Gillis]

Hello Nitesh,

Regarding this:

The premium Antispam in the server does not catch much spam. 

What version of IMail and Premium Antispam are you running? 

We have been running the newest (IMail 2006.1 which releases next week) at
Ipswitch for the past 30+ days and it includes a fairly major upgrade to the
Premium Antispam (including higher catch rates, better performance, ability
to set frequency for full and differential updates, settings to catch
gif/jpg/jpeg spam).

Hope this helps.

Bye for now,

kg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Schaible
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 12:21
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: AW: [IMail Forum] Premium Antispam does not catch much spam

Hi,
 
I can agree. This three tools are really good. Cool, i learned a new phrase:
biggest bang for the buck. My english vocabulary is getting better and
better, thanks to this list ;-)
 



--

Mit freundlichen Grüssen


Merlin Consulting
Martin Schaible
Bahnhofstrasse 27
CH-8702 Zollikon

Phone:   +41 44 391 30 00
Fax: +41 44 391 32 49

Mail:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL: http://www.merlinconsulting.ch http://www.merlinconsulting.ch/ 
Support: http://support.merlinconsulting.ch
http://support.merlinconsulting.ch/ 

GPS: N47 20.235 E8 34.226

News - Neue Produkte:

.:. NOD32 Antivirus System
.:. BlueDragon
.:. Kiwi Syslog Monitor
.:. Paessler GmbH
.:. Sawmill Loganalyzer
.:. SmarterTools
 

 




Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Matrosity
Hosting
Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. August 2006 13:35
An: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Betreff: Re: [IMail Forum] Premium Antispam does not catch much spam


There are several solutions you can implement. I've found that
mxguard, Invariant's URI and Message Sniffer is an excellent choice and
biggest bang for the buck.

I've often wondered if Imail's Antispam was worth the $ since the
only people that I've heard say anything good about it is Ipswitch. I'm sure
it works but the cost is too high compared with other choices in my book.

Good luck!

Bill


Nitesh (Ipswitch Mailing List Member) wrote: 

Hello,

The premium Antispam in the server does not
catch much spam. I update the AntiSpam every day, but the number of spam not
being caught is ever increasing. Does anybody have a workaround?

Warm Regards,

Nitesh Shah
System Admin
Technical Desk
QualiSpace - A QuantumPages Enterprise
===
Tel India: +91 (22) 6792 - 1480
Tel US: +1 (614) 827 - 1224
Fax India: +91 (22) 2530 – 3166
URL: http://www.qualispace.com
blocked::http://www.qualispace.com/ 
===
For Any Technical Query Please Use:
http://helpdesk.qualispace.com blocked::http://helpdesk.qualispace.com/ 
QualiSpace Community Discussion forum:
http://forum.qualispace.com blocked::http://forum.qualispace.com/ 



To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] Japanese characters revisited

[Kevin Gillis]

Hello 
Jonas,

We are 
currently working on adding ISO-2022-JP supportto web messagingand 
plan to demo it at the upcoming technical preview programin 2 weeks. 
Feel free to contact Jason to sign up for the TPP program. We are working 
on a date by which this will be released to all.

Bye 
for now,

kg

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Jonas 
  FornanderSent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 18:42To: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] Japanese 
  characters revisited
  
  I while ago I posted an issue with Japanese characters 
  when using webmail.
  I have some more info from the client now. Does anyone 
  know how I can solve this issue. 
  It's fairly important so any help isreally 
  appreciated.
  
  quote
  I tried sending emails from the webmail, and they were 
  garbled, but I changed the encoding to Shift-JIS, then they are 
  readable.Every time one of our clients gets email from web mail, they have 
  to change the encoding in mail software.This is the problem for the 
  client. And they are thinking the problem is crucial. I checked content-type in the header, and the 
  charset was ISO-8859-1. It is not for 
  Japanese character, I guess this is the cause of the problem. Usually Japanese email uses ISO-2022-JP. It 
  is safest way to send an email in Japanese. 
  Shift JIS is 8bit, so mail software can't handle the encoding 
  well. And actually Shift-JIS can't 
  handle ASCII. On the other hand, 
  ISO-2022-JP is 7bit and can handle ASCII. 
  
  Do you think it is easily possible to change the 
  encoding to ISO-2022-JP from Shift-JIS when the software sends emails in 
  Japanese?
  /quote
  
  Jonas 
  Fornander System 
  Administrator Netwood Communications,LLC Tel: 
  310-442-1530 Fax: 310-820-3125 "Find Out Why We're Better" * Now offering Fiber Optic Internet service throughout the continental USA. Speeds start at 5Mbps/2Mbps. 
  Go to www.netwood.net and fill in a prequal 
  request. * "Home is where my computer 
  is"
  

RE: [IMail Forum] Deleted Items Folder

[Kevin Gillis]

Hi 
Will,

Thanks 
for the feedback.

Yes, 
Mailbox size indicator is coming in 2006.1.

Default action for deleted/sent messages is currently a 
top 3 item (of the full list of 7 below). I can see how deleting mail over 
a day can cause some churn for some users, but being okay with most users. 
As you noted, this could be an extension to "always delete Sent/Deleted 
messages" - e.g. delete all messages in Sent/Deletedthat are older 
thanx days - that we are researching.

Bye 
for now,

kg

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
  WillSent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 08:56To: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] Deleted 
  Items Folder
  
  Thank you for the 
  info,
  
  Lets see, being that 
  we impose mailbox limits, there are two features that stand out the most that 
  would add me in mail administration:
  
  1 
  Mailbox size 
  indicator (I understand this is available in the next 
update)
  2 
  Default action for 
  deleted/sent messages. (I believe it should have been off as to not 
  conflict with previous version imail preferences) 
  
  Disabling forwarding 
  could also be an important feature.
  
  The rest of these 
  options in the preferences section would be nice to control and assign global 
  default for new users, but they have not proven as vital.
  
  Coping the 
  preferences.config file to all my users folders was a good solution, however 
  new users will still have Imail defaults and some of these new users will 
  begin filling up their deleted mailbox. The solution to delete deleted 
  mail older than a day has caused me to received a select number of 
  complaints. Apparently some of them wished to keep those items. 
  However, these users are few in number and we have told them not to store 
  messages in there if they do not wish to lose them. Still, It will be 
  nice to accommodate them eventually.
  
  Will
  
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin GillisSent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 4:59 
  PMTo: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] Deleted Items 
  Folder
  
  
  Hi 
  Will,
  
  
  
  Regarding this 
  (What we need is a 
  feature in Imail to determine default web messaging preferences.) 
  we have started 
  requirements for allowing the admin to set the default (or even hide 
  altogether) the ability to. Don't hesitate to prioritize them in 
  importance/relevance which helps us to 
  guide/prioritize.
  
  
  
  1) What 
  to do with attachments 2) Disabling forwarding to another account3) 
  What to do with deleted/sent messages4) Hide Message Envelope5) 
  Default Language and Language Encoding6) Control CC/BCC on/off and 
  configurable7) Attachment GUI on by default in 
  Compose
  
  
  
  bye for 
  now,
  
  
  
  kg
  
-Original 
Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of WillSent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 4:25 
PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] Deleted 
Items Folder[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, 
thank you for the tip. Ive gone ahead and created a scheduled process 
to do just that. This will cover any new customers that get 
added.

What 
we need is a feature in Imail to determine default web messaging 
preferences. Or at the very least to change the preferences to 
something that would not cause a possible problem with mail flow in 
conjunction with other Imail features. Ill wait for this in a future 
update.

Will


-Original 
Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity 
HostingSent: Tuesday, 
August 15, 2006 4:20 PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] Deleted 
Items Folder

you can do that but this 
process still covers you.Will wrote: 
For 
now I have created a default preferences.config file and copied it into each 
users folder with a script. I also purged all of my users deleted 
mailboxes. This should fix it. I understand the next update will 
have a mailbox size indicator, so this will also help with their other 
folders.

Will


-Original 
Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
On Behalf Of Matrosity 
HostingSent: Tuesday, 
August 15, 2006 3:55 PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] Deleted 
Items Folder

setup a scheduled process 
with the following:c:\imail\immsgexp.exe -td:\imail\ -d1 
-mdeleted.mbxthis will delete all email except for the current day. 
Obviously you'll want to change the drive letters for your 
instance.Regards,BillWill wrote: Since upgrading to Imail 2006, web messaging has defaulted all my usersto keeping deleted message in the deleted items 

RE: [IMail Forum] Deleted Items Folder

[Kevin Gillis]

Hi 
Will,

Regarding this (What we need is a 
feature in Imail to determine default web messaging preferences.) we have 
started requirements for allowing the admin to set the default (or even hide 
altogether) the ability to. Don't hesitate to prioritize them in 
importance/relevance which helps us to guide/prioritize.

1) 
What to do with attachments 2) Disabling forwarding to another account3) 
What to do with deleted/sent messages4) Hide Message Envelope5) Default 
Language and Language Encoding6) Control CC/BCC on/off and 
configurable7) Attachment GUI on by default in Compose

bye 
for now,

kg

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
  WillSent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 4:25 PMTo: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] Deleted 
  Items Folder[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  Yes, thank you for 
  the tip. Ive gone ahead and created a scheduled process to do just 
  that. This will cover any new customers that get 
added.
  
  What we need is a 
  feature in Imail to determine default web messaging preferences. Or at 
  the very least to change the preferences to something that would not cause a 
  possible problem with mail flow in conjunction with other Imail 
  features. Ill wait for this in a future update.
  
  Will
  
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity 
  HostingSent: Tuesday, August 
  15, 2006 4:20 PMTo: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] Deleted Items 
  Folder
  
  you can do that but this 
  process still covers you.Will wrote: 
  For now 
  I have created a default preferences.config file and copied it into each users 
  folder with a script. I also purged all of my users deleted 
  mailboxes. This should fix it. I understand the next update will 
  have a mailbox size indicator, so this will also help with their other 
  folders.
  
  Will
  
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  On Behalf Of Matrosity 
  HostingSent: Tuesday, August 
  15, 2006 3:55 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] Deleted Items 
  Folder
  
  setup a scheduled process 
  with the following:c:\imail\immsgexp.exe -td:\imail\ -d1 
  -mdeleted.mbxthis will delete all email except for the current day. 
  Obviously you'll want to change the drive letters for your 
  instance.Regards,BillWill wrote: Since upgrading to Imail 2006, web messaging has defaulted all my usersto keeping deleted message in the deleted items folder as apposed todeleting them completely. This has posed a very tedious and unfriendlydilemma with users complaining that they are not receiving mail, due tomy use of mailbox restrictions.Users are unaware that their deleted items folder is filling up untilthey have not received mail for days on end. They are then very upsetthat they have missed mail and that they were not notified or given achoice in how their mail was now deleting messages.I need a means to mass change all my users web messaging preferences topurge messages upon delete as to avoid these continual calls. For now,I suppose I'll have to script a solution.Just making this issue known...WillTo Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.htmlList Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ 

[IMail Forum] IMail 2006.1...

[Kevin Gillis]

Hello 
Gil,

yes, 
imail 2006.1 went "gold" today and participants in the Expert User Group have 
access to it. General Availability for iMail 2006.1is 
set for the first week of September.

we are 
now working on IMail 2006.1.1 (safari support, web messaging performance, 
instant messaging and a few other areas).

bye 
for now,

kg

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Gil 
  GomesSent: Friday, July 28, 2006 11:06 PMTo: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] OT: 
  Portable Generator for server room
  Interesting I ask questions that are specific to 
  the iMAIL product and get no reply. But something that's obviously WAY 
  off topic has a massive thread Have I stumbled into a general 
  forum? Is this stilll the iMAIL forum? I remember having my head 
  taken off because I asked a question that had been answered three years 
  previous... How things change... 
  Is there ANY chance that 2006.1 will be released in 
  July? I won't ask this again, rest assured... Carry on. 
  Maybe we can next discuss the merits of new trends in computer room fire 
  prevention... 
  -Gil
  -Original Message-From: "Dave Doherty" Sent 7/28/2006 
  9:32:03 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] 
  OT: Portable Generator for server roomHi John-It's not a 
  question of raw capacity. It is voltage regulation that is the most 
  important point here. The problem is that the generator has to be big 
  enough that it doesn't even know the load is there.I tried this a 
  few years ago when I knew there was going to be an outage due to planned 
  maintenance. The plant used about 3.6kW and got a 7.5kW generator. When 
  the generator got up to nominal voltage and the UPSs transferred the load, 
  the generator slowed down due to the load and the UPSs kicked back in, 
  releasing the load. That allowed the generator to speed up. This created a 
  really weird situation where everything was switching back and forth every 
  second or so. I let it run for a little while in the hopes that the system 
  would eventually get to an equilibrium point. It didn't.The small 
  gas-powered gensets use minimal flywheels and "quick" mechanical servos to 
  keep the weight down, but they are just too lightweight for decent 
  regulation. The momentum/inertia of the motor and generator, combined with 
  the mechanical servo, could not hope to keep pace with the instant load 
  switching capabilities of the UPSs.I came away from that 
  experience with a healthy respect for the REALLY heavy flywheels that come 
  with big diesel gensets. These dampen the genset's response to sudden load 
  switching.-d- Original Message - From: 
  "John T (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: 
  Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 5:19 
  PMSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: Portable Generator for server 
  roomUsage of this room is only 2.5 KW.John TeServices 
  For You"Seek, and ye shall find!" -Original 
  Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
  GlobalWeb.net Webmaster Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 2:10 PM 
  To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: 
  Portable Generator for server room We rent a 50KW or 75KW 
  generator from the local Equipment shop down the street - we have 
  approx 4 hours of battery life for our 5 racks ofservers; this is 
  plenty of time for them to drop one off to us - day or night. 
  We have gone with a 20KW before, but we place a big strain on a unit 
  that size. Sincerely, Randy 
  Armbrecht Global Web Solutions, Inc. 804-346-5300 x112 
  877-800-GLOBAL (4562) x112 
  http://globalweb.net -Original 
  Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T 
  (Lists) Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 4:55 PM To: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] OT: Portable 
  Generator for server room Has any one used a portable 
  generator for a small server room to power the server UPS batteries 
  during an extended power outage? If so, what brand and 
  specs? John T eServices For You "Seek, 
  and ye shall find!" To Unsubscribe: 
  http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge 
  Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ To 
  Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List 
  Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ 
  Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/To 
  Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.htmlList 
  Archive: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/Knowledge 
  Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/To Unsubscribe: 
  http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.htmlList Archive: 
  

RE: [IMail Forum] feature request + another

[Kevin Gillis]

hi john,

okay, make sense.

on #3, for a very similar reason as stated below, we added a Empty the XYZ
folder option to web messaging which makes it much faster (and more usable)
than having to use page scrolling, selecting multiple and then deleting
multiple.  i'll add to the feature doc.

bye for now,

kg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John E.
Richardson
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 10:50 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] feature request + another


Thanks Kevin,

I'll add a couple more comments of my own as well.


Thanks,

John


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Gillis
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 6:00 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] feature request + another

hello john,

thanks for your comments. responses below.

1. mark as spam
==KG We have this as a feature request - i like this one and have heard it
before and i've incremented the count for this one.

== JR  Excellent, thank you!

2. Weighted Spam
==KG The anti-spam solution today uses a combination of means to do this
including end users forwarding spam to a spam address which is then
processed and included in the engine. it's not the exact same as you
outlined below, but that's the current way it's being done.

== JR  I certainly didn't expect exact, I was just hoping for something
that could be more easily and locally tweaked on a specific (sub)domain or
machine.

3. Add multiple names to the TO field in a message
==KG There is one way to do this - or close to it.
Compose new message and select the To button.  Your address book opens (make
sure the address book is on top).  You can then use Shift and Shift/Click to
select all the names you wish and then use Ctrl Click to remove names).  To
finish, select to add them to the To, CC or BCC.  If you want to spread
across T/C/B, then select and add separately.  Hope this helps.

== JR  I am aware of the standard windows multiple selection methods and
they do work great in this application. I was just asked specifically about
adding a button or checkmark to 'add all' because other services have it
and it's easy. This wasn't an overly savvy tech user, but someone very
important to the organization so I thought I would pass the request along.
If it can be done, great; if not, I certainly understand.

bye for now,

kg


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John E.
Richardson
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 2:28 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] feature request + another


Hi Kevin,

Just to make a note of it so it doesn't get lost in the that's not what
Oblio meant train ...

I would like to see what you mentioned along the lines of a Mark as Spam
interface option in web messaging. I receive comments from users that things
like this would be nice and/or helpful.

While I'm dreaming BIG, is there any chance that said proposed interface
could possibly do or allow for some sort of analysis/reporting toward an end
of creating or developing either rules or increased Bayesian efficiency for
the entire (sub)domain if more than X users or X % of users mark similar or
identical messages as spam?

Another one I just got this morning, also regarding web messaging:
Is there a possibility of adding something along the lines of a checkbox or
a button which would allow the selection of all of a particular user's
contacts to be chosen at once within the address book? The interest is in
the selection of all contacts from the address book during the creation of a
new message.


Thanks,

John Richardson


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Gillis
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 11:05 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] feature request

hello oblio,

good request - want to follow up...

so are you looking for a mark as spam interface in the web messaging
client where the en user could do things like select 1 or more messages from
folder (say inbox), then select the mark as spam button/link which would
auto send the selected  messages to the spam alias (settable per domain) and
then the messages would be either permanently deleted for the end users
inbox or sent to the deleted folder or elsewhere?

bye for now,

kg

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]


---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus

RE: [IMail Forum] feature request

[Kevin Gillis]

hello oblio,

good request - want to follow up...

so are you looking for a mark as spam interface in the web messaging
client where the en user could do things like select 1 or more messages from
folder (say inbox), then select the mark as spam button/link which would
auto send the selected  messages to the spam alias (settable per domain) and
then the messages would be either permanently deleted for the end users
inbox or sent to the deleted folder or elsewhere?

bye for now,

kg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Oblio
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 10:18 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] feature request


Can we get an 'auto' alias for abuse@?  That is, mailservers are
expected by RFC2142 to accept mail to abuse, which, I think, means
each domain should have an abuse@ address.  It would be nice if it
could be created along with 'postmaster' during the creation of each
domain.  And a tool to add it retro-actively.

Oblio

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] feature request + another

[Kevin Gillis]

hello john,

thanks for your comments. responses below.

1. mark as spam
==KG We have this as a feature request - i like this one and have heard it
before and i've incremented the count for this one.

2. Weighted Spam
==KG The anti-spam solution today uses a combination of means to do this
including end users forwarding spam to a spam address which is then
processed and included in the engine. it's not the exact same as you
outlined below, but that's the current way it's being done.

3. Add multiple names to the TO field in a message
==KG There is one way to do this - or close to it.
Compose new message and select the To button.  Your address book opens (make
sure the address book is on top).  You can then use Shift and Shift/Click to
select all the names you wish and then use Ctrl Click to remove names).  To
finish, select to add them to the To, CC or BCC.  If you want to spread
across T/C/B, then select and add separately.  Hope this helps.

bye for now,

kg


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John E.
Richardson
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 2:28 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] feature request + another


Hi Kevin,

Just to make a note of it so it doesn't get lost in the that's not what
Oblio meant train ...

I would like to see what you mentioned along the lines of a Mark as Spam
interface option in web messaging. I receive comments from users that things
like this would be nice and/or helpful.

While I'm dreaming BIG, is there any chance that said proposed interface
could possibly do or allow for some sort of analysis/reporting toward an end
of creating or developing either rules or increased Bayesian efficiency for
the entire (sub)domain if more than X users or X % of users mark similar or
identical messages as spam?

Another one I just got this morning, also regarding web messaging:
Is there a possibility of adding something along the lines of a checkbox or
a button which would allow the selection of all of a particular user's
contacts to be chosen at once within the address book? The interest is in
the selection of all contacts from the address book during the creation of a
new message.


Thanks,

John Richardson


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Gillis
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 11:05 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] feature request

hello oblio,

good request - want to follow up...

so are you looking for a mark as spam interface in the web messaging
client where the en user could do things like select 1 or more messages from
folder (say inbox), then select the mark as spam button/link which would
auto send the selected  messages to the spam alias (settable per domain) and
then the messages would be either permanently deleted for the end users
inbox or sent to the deleted folder or elsewhere?

bye for now,

kg

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] Outlook Calendar / Web Calendar Question

[Kevin Gillis]

Hello John,

Good ?.

Today, there is no way to sync your Outlook and your IMail web calendar.
This requirement is on the roadmap and scheduled for a future release.  It
will work in much the same fashion as how your Contacts are bidirectionally
synched between Outlook and IMail today (when using the WorkgroupShare
components).

Bye for now,

kg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John E.
Richardson
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 8:31 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Outlook Calendar / Web Calendar Question


Good morning all,

It seems odd for a message to go out to this list and be completely
unanswered, so I'll hope not to be a nuisance and ask again.

Is there a way to get an Outlook Calendar and the Web Calendar to
synchronize? If so, how? If not, are there plans to include this in future
releases? Are they intended to be isolated and independent? If I can't tie
them together, maybe I'll have to turn off the Web Calendar to eliminate
confusion.

Also, I forgot to note that the 2006.04 ICS version I'm testing is the
Standard version.


Thank you,

John Richardson


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John E. Richardson
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 2:19 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Outlook Calendar / Web Calendar Question

Good afternoon everyone,

I'm working my way through testing the collaboration features on ICS2006.04a
on a Windows 2003 SP1 server. This server is on a public IP with a subdomain
name that is to be used in the future as we migrate and split our users into
more appropriate groups (employees and students).

The most important item to our administration is the shared calendar
feature. As I said, I have been doing some small-scale testing with a couple
of accounts on this test/future subdomain and it seems to be working fairly
well for me.

One question that I know is sure to be asked would be about the
integration/coordination/synchronization of the Outlook Calendar with the
Web Calendar. I haven't seen much about this anywhere, as far as it being
done, or even being possible.

Is there a way to get these two calendars to synchronize? If so, what do I
need to do? If not, is there a plan to add this feature in a future release?

Thanks in advance, I know your time is important.


John Richardson

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]


---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] Web Messaging 2006

[Kevin Gillis]

Hello Will,

Yes, the 2006.1 release, which is currently being used by customers via the
Expert User Program, now has the disk space indicator in the web interface.

bye for now,

kg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Will
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 8:40 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Web Messaging 2006


How may my users determine what their mailbox size is with this new
version?  I have set limits on all my account to 1000 messages and 10Mb,
which used to be visibly indicated from the old interface.

Will


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] Outlook Calendar / Web Calendar Question

[Kevin Gillis]

hello 
john,

some 
comments here.

Will this new Web Calendar get a "makeover" 
to look more like it fits withinthe new Outlook-themed web templates as 
well?
==KGYes, 
definitely in line for a makeover - faster, leaner and suitable for mobile user, 
int'l and safari.bye for 
now,

kg

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Matrosity 
  HostingSent: Monday, July 24, 2006 10:08 AMTo: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] Outlook 
  Calendar / Web Calendar Questionit would 
  also be good if this is something we can switch on and off per 
  domain.John E. Richardson wrote: 
  Thank you for your response, Kevin.

I hope this feature will be included in the near future - it will allow us
to utilize that collaboration feature without the awkward boundary of the
Web Calendar functioning like a closed-off and independent system inside a
suite which was seemingly built and marketed to integrate and collaborate.

Will this new Web Calendar get a "makeover" to look more like it fits within
the new Outlook-themed web templates as well?

Collaboration features with full synchronization between the web and client
software (with WGS), integration of the web mail and web calendar to look
like one web application to the end users and one set of style sheets or
templates to administer and identity brand - that would be a dream come
true. :)

Thanks again, I look forward to the future release.
 
 
John Richardson

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kevin Gillis
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 9:13 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Outlook Calendar / Web Calendar Question

Hello John,

Good ?.

Today, there is no way to sync your Outlook and your IMail web calendar.
This requirement is on the roadmap and scheduled for a future release.  It
will work in much the same fashion as how your Contacts are bidirectionally
synched between Outlook and IMail today (when using the WorkgroupShare
components).

Bye for now,

kg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John E.
Richardson
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 8:31 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Outlook Calendar / Web Calendar Question


Good morning all,

It seems odd for a message to go out to this list and be completely
unanswered, so I'll hope not to be a nuisance and ask again.

Is there a way to get an Outlook Calendar and the Web Calendar to
synchronize? If so, how? If not, are there plans to include this in future
releases? Are they intended to be isolated and independent? If I can't tie
them together, maybe I'll have to turn off the Web Calendar to eliminate
confusion.

Also, I forgot to note that the 2006.04 ICS version I'm testing is the
Standard version.


Thank you,

John Richardson


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John E. Richardson
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 2:19 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Outlook Calendar / Web Calendar Question

Good afternoon everyone,

I'm working my way through testing the collaboration features on ICS2006.04a
on a Windows 2003 SP1 server. This server is on a public IP with a subdomain
name that is to be used in the future as we migrate and split our users into
more appropriate groups (employees and students).

The most important item to our administration is the shared calendar
feature. As I said, I have been doing some small-scale testing with a couple
of accounts on this test/future subdomain and it seems to be working fairly
well for me.

One question that I know is sure to be asked would be about the
integration/coordination/synchronization of the Outlook Calendar with the
Web Calendar. I haven't seen much about this anywhere, as far as it being
done, or even being possible.

Is there a way to get these two calendars to synchronize? If so, what do I
need to do? If not, is there a plan to add this feature in a future release?

Thanks in advance, I know your time is important.


John Richardson

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]


---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
---
[This E-mail scanned for viru

RE: [IMail Forum] Imail Antivirus

[Kevin Gillis]

hello 
nitesh,

is it 
possible to actually send some of these infected messages, off list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), so we can escalate? 


bye 
for now,

kg

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Nitesh 
  (Ipswitch Mailing List Member)Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 9:06 
  AMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail 
  Forum] Imail Antivirus
  
  Hello,
   
  I have been using ICS Premium Edition from past couple of months and I have 
  found that the Symantec Scan Engine is not good enough to block virus infected 
  emails. There are lots of virus infected emails being received from outside. I 
  was using MxGuard with F-Prot antivirus earlier. With F-prot, I never found 
  any problem with viruses, but since MXGuard uses lot of CPU, I had to 
  discontinue it. Can anybody tell me if I can use F-Prot instead of Symantec 
  Scan engine with ICS without using MXGuard?
  
  Nitesh 
  ShahSystem AdminTechnical DeskQualiSpace - A QuantumPages 
  Enterprise===Tel India: 
  +91 (22) 6792 - 1480Tel US: 
  +1 (614)827 - 1224Fax India: 
  +91 (22) 6792  1484URL: http://www.qualispace.com===For 
  Any Technical Query Please Use: http://helpdesk.qualispace.comQualiSpace 
  Community Discussion forum: 
  http://forum.qualispace.com
  
  
  

RE: [IMail Forum] Strong Password enforcement

[Kevin Gillis]

Hello Darrell,

Good request!

Yes, this is definitely on the wish list.  This will be implemented in
WS_FTP Server 6. coming in Q4, 2006 and is slotted for IMail #next major
release#.  This is currently defined as the following:

The password is at least X (settable by IMail Admin) characters long.

Strong Passwords - Contain characters from three of the following four
categories:
1) English uppercase characters (A through Z)
2) English lowercase characters (a through z)
3) Base-10 digits (0 through 9)
4) Non-alphanumeric (for example, !, $, #, %). extended ASCII, symbolic, or
linguistic characters.

There are also variations that we are exploring such as don't allow the
last x (settable) passwords and also options to auto expire the password
after X day...

comments welcome.

bye for now,

kg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Darrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2006 9:20 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Strong Password enforcement


Everyone knows the users if they had their way would not even use a
password.

The questions specifically was is there any feature within Imail 2006 that
can force users to have strong passwords.  No different than what we have to
deal with in AD - but fortunately we have some control there.

If there is no feature within 2006 I would like to see this request be added
to the wish list.  Also, please add history to the request - can't use
the same password within x days.

Darrell


Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG
Integration, and Log Parsers.

- Original Message -
From: Bruce Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2006 8:41 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Strong Password enforcement


Can I watch you enforce the with end users?

:)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists)
Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2006 13:31
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Strong Password enforcement

Is there a way in Imail 2006 using Imail database to enforce strong
passwords?

For information, my idea of a strong password is the following:

12 plus alphanumeric characters with at least 3 letters and 3 numbers and
contains no proper words or the user name.
10 plus alphanumeric and special characters with at least 3 of the following
4 items; one small letter, one capital letter, one special character, one
number and contains no proper words or the user name.
8 plus alphanumeric and special characters with at least 1 of each the
following 4 items; one small letter, one capital letter, one special
character, one number

John T
eServices For You

Seek, and ye shall find!


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] http://www.hmailserver.com/

[Kevin Gillis]

hello 
all,

yes, 
this is an elusive one.

we 
have 2 documented reports that have come into TS. the second customer is 
waiting to get permission to purchase and install a new NIC card and expects 
toinstall the upcoming2006.1 to see if the issue is 
resolved.

if 
there are others seeing a leak with SMTPd32 with IMail 2006.xx, please contact 
me directly ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and 
we'll see if there are common issues that we can track down. 


again, 
we are trying to nail this but we are currently unable to.

bye 
for now,

kg

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Matrosity 
  HostingSent: Friday, June 30, 2006 5:11 AMTo: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comCc: Kevin Gillis; 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 
  http://www.hmailserver.com/You guys blamed it on 
  everything but your own software for months and then when there was another 
  customer with this problem you decide you need 3. I'm sorry this is something 
  you struggle to figure out but that's why I have an SA. It also shouldn't 
  matter how much time you spend fixing the problem but you should fix it. This 
  has gone on for FAR too long.For those of you who are not familiar 
  with our problem:More than 6 months ago we reported a memory "leak" or 
  "racing" problem to ipswitch using 2003 which causes us to restart smtpd32 
  twice per day. Our server is a standard Dell 1750 (latest drivers) running 
  Windows 2003 server (fully patched) and Imail 2006.3. First, ipswitch blamed 
  MxGuard then we were told it's our hardware because no one else has "our" 
  problem. The final recommendation was to change out the NIC which works 
  perfectly according to every test dell provides. When another customer came 
  forward with the EXACT same problem we're now hearing they want 3 
  customers.Yes, they spent time on this but still no solution. I was 
  even told at one point that they've spent more time on this than any other 
  customer. So what? There's a problem with the software and it should be 
  fixed.My apologies to those in support that did their best but I just 
  need this working correctly.Kevin Gillis wrote: 
  

hi 
bill,

sorry but we have reached out to the other customer experiencing this 
issue -but have not heard back. we are still working on getting other 
reproducible situations as this.

bye for now,

kig

  -Original Message-From: Matrosity Hosting [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
  Thursday, June 29, 2006 7:08 AMTo: Kevin 
  GillisSubject: Re: http://www.hmailserver.com/any idea when our memory problem is going to be 
  fixed?Kevin Gillis wrote: 
  

hi bill,

thanks for sending- pretty good offering...mySQL powered 
too.

bye for now,

kg

  -Original Message-From: Matrosity Hosting 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
  Wednesday, June 21, 2006 9:34 AMTo: Kevin 
  GillisSubject: http://www.hmailserver.com/In case you didn't already know about this:http://www.hmailserver.com/It 
  looks like it's a single version behind you at this 
  point.Bill

[IMail Forum] IMail Secure Server and ICS Premium Anti-Spam Advisory

[Kevin Gillis]

Greetings,Ipswitch recently experienced an issue with the 
service that delivers Premium Anti-Spam 
bullet signature updates.All customers who are using our Premium 
Anti-Spam - found in IMailSecureServer and Ipswitch Collaboration Suite Premium - should do the following once in order 
to continue to receive and implement 
Premium Anti-Spam bullet signature updates 
properly:
1. Stop the Premium Anti-spam StarEngine service2. Delete the .dat 
file in the StarEngine /data directory3. Restart the Premium Anti-spam 
StarEngine serviceIf you have any questions, please 
contact us at: http://www.ipswitch.com/questionsWe 
apologize for the inconvenience.
- The Ipswitch Messaging Team

RE: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.05??

[Kevin Gillis]

hi chris,

we are in final testing now and released to the Preview Users today.
general availability is still being set.

we have focused on quality and improving the installation/iis/active dir
configuration.  here's a short list of what's included in 2006.1?

1) several updates to the web messaging
==ability to create personal group lists in the web messaging including
drag n drop features when managing groups
==auto add recipients to address book
==link to web calendar
==disk space indicator
==remember un/pw when logging in
==persistent branding changes when doing updates

2) AntiSpam
== major upgrade to the mail-filters premium anti-spam (catches gif/jpg
based spam, can set spam signature update frequency, up to 25-35% faster)
and other updates.

3) several defect fixes (including auth issue in SMTP and VDomains and host
admins being able to configure user disk space) and updates including an
installation checker to make sure you have all the prerequisites before
installing

bye for now,

kg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Christopher
Checca
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 3:24 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.05??


Does anyone know when ICS 2006.05 is coming out?   I like to plan the
upgrade from 8.22 to 2006.05.

Christopher Checca
Packard Transport, Inc.
IT Department
24021 South Municipal Dr
PO Box 380
Channahon, IL.  60410
815 467 9260
815 467 6939 Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.packardtransport.com

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

[IMail Forum] IMail/ICS 2006.1

[Kevin Gillis]

hello bonno,

yes, of course.

please contact Jason Benton (see cc) and he can get you the information for
accessing.

bye for now,

kg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bonno Bloksma
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 1:38 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.05??


Hi Kevin,

Next week I'm going to set up our test server. Can I then download the
2006.1 versien even if it is beta/gamma? I'd like to approach the version
I'll be installing end of Juli on the production server as best as I can.

Groetjes,


Bonno Bloksma

- Original Message -
From: Kevin Gillis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 4:13 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.05??


 hi chris,

 we are in final testing now and released to the Preview Users today.
 general availability is still being set.

 we have focused on quality and improving the installation/iis/active dir
 configuration.  here's a short list of what's included in 2006.1?

 1) several updates to the web messaging
 ==ability to create personal group lists in the web messaging including
 drag n drop features when managing groups
 ==auto add recipients to address book
 ==link to web calendar
 ==disk space indicator
 ==remember un/pw when logging in
 ==persistent branding changes when doing updates

 2) AntiSpam
 == major upgrade to the mail-filters premium anti-spam (catches gif/jpg
 based spam, can set spam signature update frequency, up to 25-35% faster)
 and other updates.

 3) several defect fixes (including auth issue in SMTP and VDomains and
 host
 admins being able to configure user disk space) and updates including an
 installation checker to make sure you have all the prerequisites before
 installing

 bye for now,

 kg

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Christopher
 Checca
 Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 3:24 PM
 To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
 Subject: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.05??


 Does anyone know when ICS 2006.05 is coming out?   I like to plan the
 upgrade from 8.22 to 2006.05.

 Christopher Checca
 Packard Transport, Inc.
 IT Department
 24021 South Municipal Dr
 PO Box 380
 Channahon, IL. 60410
 815 467 9260
 815 467 6939 Fax
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 www.packardtransport.com

 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
 List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
 Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
 List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
 Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
 ---
 [E-mail scanned at tio.nl for viruses by Declude Virus]



---
[E-mail scanned at tio.nl for viruses by Declude Virus]

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

[IMail Forum] Browser Support and Upcoming IMail 2006.1...

[Kevin Gillis]

Title: WAY OT: command line for killing a win2k process



hi 
all,

good 
and fair comments. we have done iterative releases to address many 
customer reported issues. We' been running iMail 2006.1 
internallyfor about 2 weeks now and it's performing 
well.

we are 
working on imail 2006.1 with a major focus on quality (mostly 
within the install/config), parity items (e.g. groups within 
web messaging,remember me (un/pw) on login page to web messaging, etc.) 
and a major upgrade to Anti-Spam (e.g. catches spam with 
embedded graphics).

we'll 
be doing testing on ie7 in upcoming releases. btw, i was using safari 2.03 
and sending/receiving email was okay. There were some parity items (like 
rich text did not work and the cc/bcc drop down) but messaging/contacts and 
rules seemed to be okay and it was probably 85% working of what you can do in 
ie/ff/moz windows and ff mac.

bye 
for now,

kg

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Imail 
  AdminSent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 4:07 PMTo: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] web mail 
  compatibility with IE7 beta?
  I'm with Troy.
  
  Just for the record, I never found any features 
  in 8.x that tempted me to upgrade. I do think 2006 is tempting, provided 
  that they can fix the bugs. So that's why we're two versions 
  behind.
  
  Ben
  
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Troy D. 
Hilton 
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 

Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 10:36 
AM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] web mail 
compatibility with IE7 beta?


Same here. We’re 
still running 7.15 and it works beautifully. I try to follow many of t he 
posts here as new versions and patches come out and I wasn’t willing to jump 
into the frey of dealing with the bugs and issues that many here dealt with 
in upgrading. .15 worked fine for us so we had no immediate reason to 
upgrade….and still don’t.

Troy 
D. Hilton 
Serveon, 
Inc. 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 302-529-8640 





From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of L. BhandariSent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 9:38 
AMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] web mail 
compatibility with IE7 beta?


I have to speak 
up for at least some of us that haven't upgraded. I'm still on 8.12 because 
I like it. We have just 3 domains and very few users and IMail is exactly 
the program that we need - simple and to the point. I don't even use 1/3 of 
the features because I don't need them. When IMail decided to keep adding 
features and try to compete with Exchange, I say Kudos to them but they left 
behind users like me. I don't like how fancy, schmancy the new IMail is - I 
like the old one! And with that, I accept that I may encounter issues with 
newer technology (like new browsers or whatever). 

-Original 
  Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Matrosity 
  HostingSent: Thursday, 
  June 15, 2006 10:22 AMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] web mail 
  compatibility with IE7 beta?
  I do understand a reluctance to upgrade but 
  staying back 2 versions is a bit much.John 
  Casaleggio wrote: 
  My thoughts 
  exactly. Who are these people who never upgrade or patch, and then 
  wonder why there are problems?
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  On Behalf Of 
  RMilnerSent: 
  Thursday, June 15, 2006 10:06 AMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] web mail 
  compatibility with IE7 beta?
  
  7.15 
  != 2006
  





From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
On Behalf Of Matrosity 
HostingSent: Thursday, 
June 15, 2006 9:55 AMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] web mail 
compatibility with IE7 beta?
I've been using IE 7 for months now and web 
messaging works fine in 2006.IMail Admin wrote: 


Hi,



We 
have a client who mostly uses the webmail access to his email. We 
run IMail 7.15 on our server. Recently, he tried installing IE7 
beta. He had trouble with the browser and uninstalled it, but he 
no longer can get his web mail service to work quite right. When 
he tries to reply or send new mail, he gets the following 
error:



A _javascript_ error occured on this page. 
Error: unspecified errorPage: http://mail.bcwebhost.net8383/Signature.32879.cgi?uid=nickLine: 
116Browser: Mozilla/4.0/Compatible; MSIE 6.0; 

RE: [IMail Forum] Being blocked by Hotmail

[Kevin Gillis]

hello all,

the contributions are appreciated.  this is of course an open forum but
please keep it clean and decent.

bye for now,

kg


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ronald E.
Kushner
Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 7:34 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Being blocked by Hotmail


Rod Dorman wrote:

On Monday, May 22, 2006, 11:41:47, Gary Jorgenson wrote:


I've resorted to telling my customers that if they send email to Hotmail
or
 MSN  accounts,   the email may or may not arrive at it's destination.
  ...
They are still blocking my IP address despite my efforts to appease them.
  ...
If anyone else has sought legal counsel on this matter,  please contact me
privately.  I'd like to gather as much information as possible before
contacting my attorney.



I'm  not  aware  of  any legal requirement that requires a MTA to accept
e-mail from anyone and everyone.

Unless you've got an agreement with Hotmail that states they will accept
your e-mail what are you expecting your attorney to do?


And if you did sue them, I am sure they'd find a way to bend you over
and stick it back to you without any lube.

Microsoft has lawyers like a sleazy restaurant has cockroaches.

-Ron

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] Integration tools

[Kevin Gillis]

hi eric,

very nice!

pda templates and you've got mail are 
particularly good ones - both areon the roadmap for later this year. 


we have added login options (remember un and 
remember pw) to the upcoming 2006.1 - for this 
one, are you seeing un/pw's being stored in the browser history via http://domain.com/iclient/login.aspx? 


"Lastly I wrote a better mail login script 
than that sso.html garbage that shows your username and password in 
thebrowser history. It is in ASP. The viewstate is based on 2006.04a. If 
you are running an earlier build copy the viewstate string from your login page 
and use it."

bye for now,

kg

  -Original 
  Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Eric 
  CoffmanSent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 4:09 PMTo: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] Integration 
  tools
  Hello,
  
  I have written some PDA formatted pages for use in my portal using 
  theMailBee IMAP asp component. Its not 100% full featured but works good 
  for the folks on a PDA that don't want to deal with setting up outlook. PDA 
  Webmail.Anyhow, if anyone is interested let me know.
  
  Also I wrote an asp page that uses Mailbee to update a mail icon in my 
  portal. It checks a users mail account at a set interval (11 minutes for me) 
  and sets a cookie. This way every page view does not trigger a mail check) 
  After the check is completed it updates the icon and the title text associated 
  with it. If anyone is interested let me know. This is my resolution to the old 
  "You've got Imail" app.
  
  Lastly I wrote a better mail login script than that sso.html garbage that 
  shows your username and password in thebrowser history. It is in ASP. 
  The viewstate is based on 2006.04a. If you are running an earlier build copy 
  the viewstate string from your login page and use it. Its not all that complex 
  but it works well for me.
  
  %
  Response.Buffer = TrueResponse.Expires = 
  -1Response.ExpiresAbsolute = 
  #1/1/1980#Response.CacheControl = "no-cache, no-store, 
  must-revalidate, private"Response.AddHeader "Pragma", 
  "no-cache"
  
  
  mailhost=http://yourserver.com
  username="yourusername" ' likely from a database
  password="yourpassword" ' likely from a database
  %
  
  body form 
  name="MailForm" 
  action="" 
  method="post"input type="hidden" 
  name="__VIEWSTATE" 
  value="dDwxNzUyMTA5MTQ7dDw7bDxpPDE+Oz47bDx0PDtsPGk8MTE+O2k8MTY+Oz47bDx0PHQ8O3Q8aTw4PjtAPEVuZ2xpc2g7566A5L2T5Lit5paHO+e5gemrlOS4reaWhztGcmFuw6dhaXM7RGV1dHNjaDtJdGFsaWFubzvml6XmnKzoqp47RXNwYcOxb2w7PjtAPGVuLVVTO3poLUNOO3poLVRXO2ZyLUZSO2RlLURFO2l0LUlUO2phLUpQO2VzLUVTOz4+O2w8aTwwPjs+Pjs7Pjt0PHA8cDxsPFRleHQ7V2lkdGg7XyFTQjs+O2w8TG9naW47MTw4MHB4PjtpPDI1Nj47Pj47Pjs7Pjs+Pjs+Pjs+PdrAd5wl2s2JyKsS4uLVqHend5c=" 
  /input type="hidden" name=btnLogin 
  value=Logininput type=hidden name="txtUsername" 
  value="%=username%"input type=hidden 
  name="txtPassword" 
  value="%=password%"input type=hidden 
  name="ddlLanguage" value="en-US"input type= 
  "hidden" name="__EVENTTARGET" value="" /input 
  type="hidden" name="__EVENTARGUMENT" value="" 
  //form
  

RE: [IMail Forum] Time stamps and Daylight Savings Time.

[Kevin Gillis]

hi John,

so mail is flowing correctly but time stamp is off by one hour?

what time zone are you in and does it use DST?  we have encountered a fairly
obscure issue with 2006 (as you noted below) that was actually impacting
delivery in some case but i'm not familiar with this issue existing in imail
8.xx.

bye for now,

kg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Doyle
Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 8:59 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Time stamps and Daylight Savings Time.


Good Morning

I'm running 8.22 on a Windows 2003 server. I went through the archives and
did not come up with a solution to my issue. The time stamps are wrong on
the email we handle. I tried setting the clock back an hour and that worked
until it synced up the next time, I also tried setting the GMT offset off by
an hour, and while the header is correct, the time received that the user
sees is still off.

Is there a patch, or workaround for this? I see a dll for 2006 but none for
8.x or earlier, and I'm just not ready to upgrade to 2006.


Thanks for any help.

John

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert
Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 11:08 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Monitor Service

Why? Never had any trouble with it, had it running since v 6.

// Robert

Kevin Bilbee wrote:

 Leave it disabled



 Kevin Bilbee



 *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Kelly Scotto
 *Sent:* Friday, May 26, 2006 9:13 AM
 *To:* Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
 *Subject:* [IMail Forum] Monitor Service



 I currently have the Imail Monitor service disabled. I was wondering
 what the general feedback is for this service, basically is it worth
 running?























 /Kelly Scotto/
 Assistant Network Administrator
 Speedee Cash Management
 850-682-0475 ext. 1801




To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] Time stamps and Daylight Savings Time.

[Kevin Gillis]

Hi John,

Thanks for the update.

Keep an eye on it and let us know if you see anything again.

Glad to hear the services having been running uninterrupted for a few weeks.

bye for now,

kg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Doyle
Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 1:38 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Time stamps and Daylight Savings Time.


Kevin

I had not rebooted or restarted services since daylight savings time. I have
2003 set up to auto adjust for DST. After restarting services, things seem
to be fine. I really have no clue if that was it or not. It's got the
correct times now in both the header and the displayed time in outlook.

John


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Gillis
Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 9:25 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Time stamps and Daylight Savings Time.

hi John,

so mail is flowing correctly but time stamp is off by one hour?

what time zone are you in and does it use DST?  we have encountered a fairly
obscure issue with 2006 (as you noted below) that was actually impacting
delivery in some case but i'm not familiar with this issue existing in imail
8.xx.

bye for now,

kg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Doyle
Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 8:59 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Time stamps and Daylight Savings Time.


Good Morning

I'm running 8.22 on a Windows 2003 server. I went through the archives and
did not come up with a solution to my issue. The time stamps are wrong on
the email we handle. I tried setting the clock back an hour and that worked
until it synced up the next time, I also tried setting the GMT offset off by
an hour, and while the header is correct, the time received that the user
sees is still off.

Is there a patch, or workaround for this? I see a dll for 2006 but none for
8.x or earlier, and I'm just not ready to upgrade to 2006.


Thanks for any help.

John

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert
Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 11:08 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Monitor Service

Why? Never had any trouble with it, had it running since v 6.

// Robert

Kevin Bilbee wrote:

 Leave it disabled



 Kevin Bilbee



 *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Kelly Scotto
 *Sent:* Friday, May 26, 2006 9:13 AM
 *To:* Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
 *Subject:* [IMail Forum] Monitor Service



 I currently have the Imail Monitor service disabled. I was wondering
 what the general feedback is for this service, basically is it worth
 running?























 /Kelly Scotto/
 Assistant Network Administrator
 Speedee Cash Management
 850-682-0475 ext. 1801




To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: RE: [IMail Forum] Being blocked by Hotmail

[Kevin Gillis]

hi dave,

is this possibly related to the HELO/EHLO issue?

bye for now,

kg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Doherty
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 5:26 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: RE: [IMail Forum] Being blocked by Hotmail


This is the same issue that IMail servers have with the CBL also. It IS a 
problem, despite Ipswitch's assertion that it is not.

-Dave Doherty
Skywaves, Inc.


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: RE: [IMail Forum] Being blocked by Hotmail

[Kevin Gillis]

hi d,

thanks.

fwiw, the ability to configure the HELO/EHLO is complete and will be
included in the IMail 2006.1 release coming next month.

Also included in that release will be:

Ability to create personal groups
Auto add recipients to addr book
List owner and web calendar links in client
Remember Me and Remember Password in client
Admin Virtual login w/out FQDN
Disk Space Indicator
Major upgrade to Mail-filters (to catch all the gif/jpg spam)
Auto Preservation of any web messaging branding changes
and a few other items and defect fixes.

bye for now,

kg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Doherty
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 6:44 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: RE: [IMail Forum] Being blocked by Hotmail


It sure reads that way to me.

-d


- Original Message -
From: Kevin Gillis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 6:15 PM
Subject: RE: RE: [IMail Forum] Being blocked by Hotmail


 hi dave,

 is this possibly related to the HELO/EHLO issue?

 bye for now,

 kg

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Doherty
 Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 5:26 PM
 To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
 Subject: Re: RE: [IMail Forum] Being blocked by Hotmail


 This is the same issue that IMail servers have with the CBL also. It IS a
 problem, despite Ipswitch's assertion that it is not.

 -Dave Doherty
 Skywaves, Inc.


 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
 List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
 Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
 List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
 Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/



To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] Contacts

[Kevin Gillis]

hi 
all,

yes, 
the ability to create your own personal groups is coming in 2006.1 which is 
scheduled for june. 

we're 
also looking to add a installation pre-reqs checker (looks for things like IIS, 
static IP Address, etc.), new mail-filters anti-spam and a few other 
new/enhanced items.

bye 
for now,

kg

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Gil 
  GomesSent: Monday, May 08, 2006 4:18 PMTo: 
  imail_forum@list.ipswitch.com; 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] 
  Contacts
  I believe this will be available when the combined 
  2006.05 and 2006.06 updates ship in June... 
  -Gil-Original Message-From: "Matrosity Hosting" 
  Sent 5/8/2006 4:13:12 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: 
  Re: [IMail Forum] ContactsI believe grouping is coming 
  for Imail 2006 but it is a ways off. This was discussed not very long 
  ago.BillLouis Pagan wrote: 
  

A 
contacts folder tha users can store their contacts for different 
clients.

  -Original Message-From: Matrosity 
  Hosting [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 4:06 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: 
  Re: [IMail Forum] Contactswhat are you 
  trying to accomplish?Louis Pagan wrote: 
  

So then the answer is no, it does not have a Contacts/Tasks/Notes 
feature that we can use? Or do we have to point all our folders to 
Access db's as a workaround?

  -Original Message-From: 
  Matrosity Hosting [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 3:54 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: 
  Re: [IMail Forum] ContactsI believe 
  2006 uses an access dbLouis Pagan wrote: 
  








Hi,

Does IMail have a Contacts folder? And Notes/Tasks 
folders or the equivalent. I didn't see it in the 
instructions.


Thanks,

Louis

RE: [IMail Forum] IMail and AD

[Kevin Gillis]

Hello 
All,

I just 
want to add some clarifications here. 

SMTPD32 should, in "normal" use,be utilizing approximately 
75-100MB. Peaking at 300-400MB at busy times is expected as well. If 
others are seeing memory usage above 500MB or 750MB, then something is 
happening. 

We 
continue to turn around releases every 45 or so days and have another scheduled 
for next month so we willstrive to be as responsive as possible in adding 
new features,addressing parity issues or other defects reported to 
Technical Support.

bye 
for now,

kg

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Matrosity 
  HostingSent: Monday, May 08, 2006 11:11 AMTo: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] IMail and 
  ADwe ran imail 6 through 8.22 on a Windows 
  2K DM for years. When we upgraded to 8.0x we noticed what appeared to be a 
  memory leak in smtpd32. When I brought this to the attention of ipswitch tech 
  support they said it was now normal for smtpd32 to use 300 MB's of ram so I 
  dropped it.For 2006 we bought a brand new server running Win 2K3 and 
  is a DM with dual procs and 2 GB's of ram. Now, we're seeing smtpd32 run up to 
  using as much as 800 MB's of ram! We're restarting it daily to bring it to 
  "normal" levels.I've waited 3 weeks for ipswitch to resolve this issue 
  and am pretty much being ignored since they can't reproduce the problem. This 
  is what $1000 SA gets you these days from Ipswitch.Matrosity 
  Hosting wrote: 
  IMHO we're having problems they can't fix nor troubleshoot is why 
this is now a recommendation.Adam Campbell wrote: 
I just 
  finished reading the release notes for .04a, http://www.ipswitch.com/support/imail/guide/2006/2006_04/IMail_RelNotes.htm. 
  It mentions under "Required Software": "Do not deploy 
  IMail on a Windows 2000 Domain Controller in an Active Directory 
  environment." My predecessor and I have done this since 2001. 
  What problems should I be experiencing? adamc To 
  Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
  List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ 
  Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ 
  

RE: [IMail Forum] Latest on the .04 update?

[Kevin Gillis]

Hello Shaun,

IMail 2006.04 went gold yesterday.  We are notifying partners and
releasing to public tomorrow.

Bye for now,

kg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Shaun Mickey
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 10:55 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Latest on the .04 update?


I thought the .04 update was coming out by the end of April, anyone
heard anything or know what the status is?

Thanks,
Shaun


---
Shaun Mickey
270net Technologies
Phone: 301.663.6000 x28
Fax: 301.663.4410
www.270net.com

Internet/Technology Solutions for Business and Government

---

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] Web Messaging evaluation...

[Kevin Gillis]

hi 
shaun,

yes, 
good request on personal groups in web messaging. 

we are 
currently working on this and plan to demo at the Expert User Review Monday, May 
15, 2006. At this point, we don't plan on limiting the # of members in the 
Personal Groups but that may be a nice admin controlled 
feature.

looking into the other issues 
below.

bye 
for now,

kg

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Shaun 
  MickeySent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 2:05 PMTo: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] Web 
  Messaging evaluation... 
  
  Ive been looking 
  around the webmail also. One nice feature Im sure our customers would like to 
  see is a grouping feature for contacts. Just as Gil notes, Outlook 
  Express has an option to create groups so that you can send mail to many 
  people easily. This would be nice to have in the webmail, maybe with a 
  cap of 20-25 users per group, so that sending broadcast mails is not 
  possible.
  
  
  Thanks,
  
  Shaun
  ---Shaun 
  Mickey270net TechnologiesPhone: 
  301.663.6000 x28Fax: 301.663.4410www.270net.com
  "Internet/Technology 
  Solutions for Business and 
  Government"---
  
  
  
  
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gil GomesSent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 1:58 
  PMTo: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] Web Messaging 
  evaluation... 
  
  I've been 
  an MS Outlook Express user for many years, but I've recently cut over to 
  Version 2006.3IMAIL WebMessaging in order to evaluate its use as our 
  company's primary email client. I have many, many folders and use 
  Message Rules extensively. I've only been doing this for a week or so, 
  but here are a few things I've found... 
  Scroll bar for email folder 
  screen:
  If you 
  keep folder names fairly small, you're okay. If not... You can't 
  tell if you have any messages in those folders, if you're using 
  
  message 
  rules, because the message count is at the end of the folder name. 
  Resizing width of folder frame sometimes causes scrollbar length 
  
  to shrink 
  so you can't get to the bottom folders... 
  
  Auto-fill:
  I guess 
  I'm just spoiled by Outlook Express' ability to fill out the remainder of an 
  intended recipient's email address, based on the 
  characters you've already typed, if the recipient is 
  in your address book. Is it even possible to implement something like 
  this in a Web 
  Messaging 
  environment?
  
  Message 
  rules using subject as 
  criteria:
  I've seen 
  some weird results where many emails with extremely dissimilar subject lines 
  wind up in the same folder. I had one folder for 
  
  Imail 
  Forums that relied on the subject, for instance. After a few hours it 
  resembled my INBOX. I switched that rule to use the TO: 
  
  criteria 
  and all is well.
  
  Attachments:
  We're 
  using a MITEL 3300 PBX which has the ability to forward Voicemail to 
  email. Works great with Outlook Express, but with iMAIL WebMail 
  
  all you 
  wind up with is an attachment called "Download.aspx." 
  
  
  Mark 
  all (in current folder) as read:
  Again... 
  I could live without this, but I'm so used to using it with OutLook Express 
  that it'd be great if it were included. 
  
  Question:
  I haven't 
  been able to find the answer to this, so I'll ask it here. How often 
  does WebMessaging check for new email? Is this a 
  
  configurable parameter?
  Gil 
  GomesNetwork ManagerLeach  Garner Company57 John L. Dietsch 
  SquareNorth Attleboro, MA 
  02761-0200V 
  774.643.1330F 508.695.4093E 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [IMail Forum] Imail 2006 Comments Revisit

[Kevin Gillis]

hello 
oblio,

this 
sounds very strange and you obviously should not have rename (twice) the main 
mbx file to address issues. what version are you running and have you been 
in touch with TS? If not, I will arrange a follow-up. you can ping 
me directly at [EMAIL PROTECTED].

btw, i'm, definitely not trying to diminish the 
importance of the "smaller" items and we will continue to relentless tackle 
them. for some folks AD and WGS are significant enhancements but 
understandably for many, it adds little value to how you use, maintain and 
manage your messaging solution.

bye 
for now,

kg

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
  OblioSent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 9:10 AMTo: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] Imail 2006 
  Comments RevisitWell, these all sound like nice features, 
  but currently, I have quite a few customers who are hounding me because they 
  simply can't use the webmail interface. It's been rife with problems, 
  one of which seems to be cured by renaming the main box, opening, and renaming 
  it back. Trouble is, I'd have to walk every user through that 
  process. Or another where users simply can't delete messages (through 
  IMAP). I really need to get the *basics* working before being interested 
  in fancy add-on features; it worries me that you seem to be including those as 
  "smaller items".So when are some of these going to be 
  released?At 4/24/2006 11:40 AM, you wrote:
  hello 
Oblio,Yes, that is correct - 
.03 is the latest public release. IMail 2006.04 is in final 
verification/testing and is slotted for this week or next. Here's a 
short summary of what's new in .04. 

  Active Directory Support (now can handle 10's of thousands of 
  users in seconds when it used to be minutes). Users who currently 
  are using NT domain support in Active Directory environments can now 
  choose to use Active Directory instead. Using Active Directory in place of 
  NT domain support provides much improved performance for environments with 
  1000 users. 
  Updated WorkgroupShare (major performance (up to 50% faster), 
  schedule, sync status indicator, ability to cancel a synch) 
  About 25 smaller items including - 
  many in web messaging 
  
Added link to Web Calendar 
Can use adduser.exe to add 1 or 2 char 
usernames 
RegBack allows you to restore 
backups 
Fixed defect in which a User's folder is 
left behind after deleting user from IAdmin 
Fixed defect in which spaces were not showing up correctly with 
encoding (Eudora) 
Fixed problem where Web Client didn't 
display inline images 
Fixed server time when changing to 
Daylight Savings Time 
  Full language support in web 
  messaging for Fr/Ge/Sp/It/Ja/Si and Tr Ch We are also rolling .05 
and .06 into a single release that will be available in June and will 
include several new and parity features including (this list is not final 
yet) a new MailFilters AntiSpam (more control over catching inline gif spam, 
frequency of updates), Disk Space Indicator, Ability to make Personal 
Groups, Ability to Add Sender To Contacts, Persistence of Private Label 
Changes (subsequent upgrades will not overwrite any custom branding) and a 
few other items which we'll be demoing in 3-4 
weeks.bye for 
now,kg

RE: [IMail Forum] Upgrade Imail Server 8.22 to 2006.3 Verdict

[Kevin Gillis]

Hi All,

Yes, we currently support Firefox on the Mac and are in the process of
working on Safari as well (this is a top request that we have to
resolve...).

bye for now,

kg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Grant Griffith
- IMail
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 11:25 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Upgrade Imail Server 8.22 to 2006.3 Verdict


I honestly do not remember.  I know it is not in .4 or .5 as I am part of
the expert user group and it has not been addressed yet in those.  It does
work on one browser on Mac OS X, not sure which one and not sure on version
9 or not.  Have not tested on 9.

Kevin, can you give us any insight on this?

Thanks,
Grant Griffith
Web Application Developer
Enhanced Telecommunications Corp.
(812)932-1000

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob McGregor
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 11:19 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Upgrade Imail Server 8.22 to 2006.3 Verdict

Grant,
Has Ipswitch let on to you if or when? Also, I'm assuming you mean OS X and
not 9?


-- Original Message --
From: Grant Griffith - IMail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Date:  Thu, 27 Apr 2006 10:58:28 -0400

If you have any Mac users I would not do it yet.  We are also an ISP and
can
not upgrade until the webmail works for Mac users.

Thanks,
Grant Griffith
Web Application Developer
Enhanced Telecommunications Corp.
(812)932-1000

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Brown
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 10:33 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Upgrade Imail Server 8.22 to 2006.3 Verdict

What is the verdict with the latest release of Imail Server 2006.3?
Previously, Web Mail was way too slow and there were many other issues.

Is it now safe for an ISP to deploy it or are there several
outstanding issues which will cause us customer service grief?

Thanks,




Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.inetconcepts.net
(972) 788-2364Fax: (972) 788-5049


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/



To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/



To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] Imail 2006 Comments Revisit

[Kevin Gillis]

hello 
Oblio,

Yes, 
that is correct - .03 is the latest public release. IMail 2006.04 is in 
final verification/testing and is slotted for this week or next. Here's a 
short summary of what's new in .04. 

  Active Directory Support (now can 
  handle 10's of thousands of users in seconds when it used to be minutes). Users who currently 
  are using NT domain support in Active Directory environments can now choose to 
  use Active Directory instead. Using Active Directory in place of NT domain 
  support provides much improved performance for environments with 1000 
  users. 
  Updated 
  WorkgroupShare (major performance (up to 50% faster), schedule, sync 
  status indicator, ability to cancel a 
  synch)
  About 25 smaller items 
  including - many in web messaging
  
Added link to Web 
Calendar
Can use adduser.exe 
to add 1 or 2 char usernames
RegBack allows you 
to restore backups
Fixed defect 
in which a User's folder is left behind after deleting user from IAdmin 

Fixed defect 
in which spaces were not showing up correctly with encoding 
(Eudora)
Fixed problem where 
Web Client didn't display inline images
Fixed server time when changing to Daylight Savings Time 

  Full language support in web messaging for 
  Fr/Ge/Sp/It/Ja/Si and Tr Ch
We are also rolling .05 and .06 into a single 
release that will be available in June and will include several new and parity 
features including (this list is not final yet)a new MailFilters AntiSpam 
(more control over catching inline gif spam, frequency of updates), Disk Space 
Indicator, Ability to make Personal Groups, Ability to Add Sender To Contacts, 
Persistence of Private Label Changes (subsequent upgrades will not overwrite any 
custom branding) and a few other items which we'll be demoing in 3-4 
weeks.

bye for now,

kg

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
  OblioSent: Monday, April 24, 2006 10:36 AMTo: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] Imail 2006 
  Comments RevisitKevin, you mention .04 and .05, but the 
  patch site still says .03 on March 9th. Are they not ready for public 
  release?
  ==KG Yes, we have 
customers running with 50k users (edu). In IMail 2006.04 and .05, we 
added support for Active Directory and demoed this week (Tues). We 
made significant strides in AD support and showed 20,000 users loading in 
5 seconds on a 3MHz, 1GB server. Paging feature is scheduled to 
better access/manage users.

RE: [IMail Forum] tmp files in spool directory

[Kevin Gillis]

hi 
bill,

yes, 
this is one that we have been unable to reproduce, even after logging into the 
environment experiencing this.

are 
other folks seeing/experiencing SMTPD32 memory leaks - if so we'd like 
to hear more so we can try and nail this one.The symptoms appear to be 
that SMTPD32 races and starts chewing up memory.

bye 
for now,

kg

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Matrosity 
  HostingSent: Monday, April 24, 2006 5:50 AMTo: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] tmp files 
  in spool directorythis is now a known 
  problem with 2006. I also have a memory leak which they have been unable to 
  find a solution for and I've been waiting for over a week to hear 
  back.Stefan Paege wrote: 
  Hi, 
another small problem with ICS2006.3 I just checked my spool 
directory and found lots of temporary files. All files follow the naming 
scheme tmp***.tmp where *** is a three digit hex number. All files are 2KB 
in size. Checking the content of the files I found that all are valid 
e-mails that were sent to an alias of type "Program". In my case it is a 
MailSniffer update announcement that comes in several times a day. The mails 
are received correctly and trigger the related CMD file so my MailSniffer 
updates do work. But IMail leaves such a spool file every time. Just 
a small glitch? 

[IMail Forum] 2 threads converged...

[Kevin Gillis]

hi 
all,

i 
think this crossover wascaused by me. there are2 separate 
topics. at this point, Ipswitch has not seen correlations between 
them. In summary, here are the 2 
topics:

1. TMP Files

  there 
  are lots of tmp files that get created in the 
  normal usage of IMailand this is expected and normal 
  behavior.
2. SMTP Chewing up 
Memory

  this is the one that Ipswitch has not seen beforewith IMail 2006.03 (or the .04 that's in final 
  testing) and we are working with one customer tofigure it out. We are looking for customers who are 
  experiencing issues specifically with SMTPD32 eating up memory who are running 
  IMail 2006.03.
Also, 
as Martin mentioned, with the upgrade to 2006.03, we have found that some 
customers who were doing regularly scheduled restarts are longer doing 
sobut that's really up to the IMail Admin. If IMail runs faster and 
performs betterwhen doing so, then it's fine to continue doing 
so.

bye 
for now,

kg
__ Kevin R. Gillis Director of Product Management Ipswitch, Inc.  e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] p: 
781.676.5739 f: 781.676.5720s: skype 
kevingillis Ipswitch, Inc., publishers of WhatsUp 
Professional, IMail, WS_FTP Professional and WS_FTP Server 

RE: [IMail Forum] Imail 2006 Comments Revisit

[Kevin Gillis]

hello Eric,

thanks for following up. 

here are a few responses. obviously 
others weigh in as well. 


- There is no PDA mail. There wasn't before but I 
had written one using the old template system. I hope there is one coming as the 
new templates do not seem to change friendly.
==KG The 
new webmail supports mobile devices. we have many blackberry and other (e.g. 
Treo) mobile device users using a mix of web based email or a pop client that 
runs on the mobile device. We seen/heard a few issues with bb, but for the 
most part, it appears to work okay.

- Webmail does not have a page title. It simply says 
the http://myip.com/IClient/default.aspx. 
The default.aspx page is generated via .net code and I could not find a way to 
add a simple title tag to it.
==KG 
Excellent request. I'll add to the roadmap. We allow users to rename 
WS_FTP Pro application name and it makes sense to offer this for web pages as 
well, especially since you can brand them yourself. 

For IMail, 
this week (tues), we demoed the new feature that allows you to brand/customize 
the GUI forboth domains and vdomains and to have these customizations 
persist after an upgrade. Adding a title option would be nice. http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-20051122-DM01.htm

- There is no way for users to see how much of their 
disk quota they have used. What is the point of setting a quota and not showing 
users how they are doing? 
==KG This 
has been completed and was demoed in IMail 2006.05 demo this week 
(Tues).

Screenshots of my mail templates are here:

http://mercury.hsc.wvu.edu/imail/screenshot001.jpg 
Desktop Main Page
http://mercury.hsc.wvu.edu/imail/screenshot002.jpg 
PDA Main Page
http://mercury.hsc.wvu.edu/imail/screenshot003.jpg 
PDA Message List
http://mercury.hsc.wvu.edu/imail/screenshot004.jpg 
Desktop Viewing Message

- There is no way to show how many unread messages 
there are from outside the mail program. (Similar to the You've Got Imail 
addin). I want to have an envelope icon in my portal and have it indicate if 
there are unread messages in their mailbox. I can do this now in 8.x using 
something like "You've Got Imail" did. This is not possible in the 2006. I may 
have to resort to a 3rd party asp based imap component. 
==KG 
Excellent request. I'll add to the roadmap.

- There is a user preference to change the "reply 
to" address. This actually changes the persons email address in the Imail 
database. Problem is if you change your reply to address you LOSE all of your 
contacts. Change it, log out, log in and see for your self.
==KG I 
believe this has been addressed in one of the patch 
releases.

- Certain features in Web Admin pop an 
authentication box. Probably for good reason but it seems like it is a broken 
product when it does that from a clean install.
==KG Can 
you share more details on this one?

- Contacts are saved in an Access database. Just 
seems stupid since my user database is in an SQL Server. One more thing to get 
corrupt :) 
==KG This 
is true. Btw, we are releasing a new version of WGS that is up to 50% 
faster and allows you to share attachments, schedule your synch schedule and a 
few others things.

Anyone using this in production for 1000 users 
and having success? 
==KG Yes, 
we have customers running with 50k users (edu). In IMail 2006.04 and .05, 
we added support for Active Directory and demoed this week (Tues). We made 
significant strides in AD support and showed 20,000 users loading in 5 
seconds on a 3MHz, 1GB server. Paging feature is scheduled to better 
access/manage users.

bye for now,

kelly g;-)

  -Original 
  Message-From: Eric Coffman 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 4:24 
  PMTo: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Imail 2006 
  Comments Revisit
  In December I did a test install of Imail 2006 and 
  came across a few issues that made me decide against upgrading. Can someone 
  tell me if any of the following have been addressed?
  
  
- There is no PDA mail. There wasn't before but 
I had written one using the old template system. I hope there is one coming 
as the new templates do not seem to change friendly.

- Webmail does not have a page title. It simply 
says the http://myip.com/IClient/default.aspx. 
The default.aspx page is generated via .net code and I could not find a way 
to add a simple title tag to it.

- There is no way for users to see how much of 
their disk quota they have used. What is the point of setting a quota and 
not showing users how they are doing? 

Screenshots of my mail templates are here:

http://mercury.hsc.wvu.edu/imail/screenshot001.jpg 
Desktop Main Page
http://mercury.hsc.wvu.edu/imail/screenshot002.jpg 
PDA Main Page
http://mercury.hsc.wvu.edu/imail/screenshot003.jpg 
PDA Message List
http://mercury.hsc.wvu.edu/imail/screenshot004.jpg 
Desktop Viewing Message

- There is no way to show how many 

RE: [IMail Forum] Error Starting QueueMgr?

[Kevin Gillis]

Title: Error Starting QueueMgr?



Hello 
Alex,

Thanks 
for the feedback/hint!

You 
are right and we are working on this - we are going to display licensing status 
in all of our web products (imail, ftp, wup, etc.) so that it's very clear what 
is going on with your activation/trial status.

bye 
for now,

kg

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Hirthe, 
  AlexanderSent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 9:41 AMTo: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: AW: [IMail Forum] Error 
  Starting QueueMgr?
  THANK YOU!!! so easy to 
  "repair", so hard to find. 
  
  Hint to Ipswitch: a usefull error message would have 
  saved my (at least) hours. 
  
  Alex
  


Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Shaun 
MickeyGesendet: Donnerstag, 20. April 2006 15:06An: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comBetreff: RE: [IMail Forum] Error 
Starting QueueMgr?


Might want to 
check your activation, I just had the same problem, and in the forum they 
said it was that I hadnt activated. Went back and sure enough it 
required activation, though I only had it working for 2 days then the 
weekend went by and it was broken as you describe on the Monday 
afterward.

I dont know how 
Im supposed to evaluate software within 2 days without needing an 
activation We use sawmill log analyzer, they offer a 30 day trial, 
and I received another 30 day evaluation key when the first ran out, to 
complete the setup and get everything prepped

I cant believe 
you will only get two activations per key, yet they want you to activate it 
on a test server for just evaluation purposes 
incredible.


Thanks,

Shaun
---Shaun 
Mickey270net 
TechnologiesPhone: 301.663.6000 x28Fax: 
301.663.4410www.270net.com
"Internet/Technology 
Solutions for Business and 
Government"---




From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hirthe, 
AlexanderSent: Thursday, 
April 20, 2006 7:52 AMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] Error Starting 
QueueMgr?

Hello, 

I'm trying to install Imail 
2006.03. 
during the installation I'm 
getting an error, that the Quemanager didn't start in time and I should 
start it manually. Some seconds later I'll get an 
error "String STR_ERROR_SVC_START_TIMEOUT" was not found in the string 
table" And "QueueMGRSTR_ERROR_SVC_START_TIMEOUT". 

I can't start the Queuemanager, 
I'm allways getting these errors. (and the timeout is immidiatelly after 
clicking "start")
I tried everything (?) (removed 
 reinstalled, removed \Ipswitch\*.*, searched the registry, .) 
the Queuemanager won't start.
Do you have a good idea for me? 
I do not want to reinstall Windows :) 
OS: Windows 2003 Server, 
Webedition Installed: Imail 8, updated to 
2006 Beta, then 2006.01, 02, now after updating to 2006.03 the error occurs. 
Other Software: nothing 
(ok, Intel LAN Drivers, Framework 2.0) 
I installed 2006.02 again, but 
now I cannot start the queuemanager here too. 
??? 

Alex 

RE: [IMail Forum] Imail 2006 User contact information...

[Kevin Gillis]

Hi All,

We are also looking at delete user options that may make it cleaner in the
future such as, upon user deletion, remove:

1. all data [default]
2. all mail folders
3. all contacts
4. all calendar data
5. etc.

bye for now,

kg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jason Henline
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 8:21 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Imail 2006 User contact information...


WARNING!  Doing what Eric recommended will remove any entries that may have
been added since upgrading to 2006.

This information is stored in an access db.  You could manually edit the
tables in that DB to remove the unwanted contacts.  I strongly recommend
making a backup of the DB before doing this.

Jason H.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Shanbrom
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 4:17 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Imail 2006 User contact information...

Gil,

There is another possibility that I have not tried but should work... Delete

the workgroupshare mdb (database) then run a repair install from the control

panel. This should re-create the database and then repopulate it with the
corrected aliases.txt entries

Eric S
- Original Message -
From: Gil Gomes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 2:25 PM
Subject: [IMail Forum] Imail 2006 User contact information...


We're in the process of installing Imail 2006.3.  We ran the wgscvt.exe

 utility before the alias.txt files were corrected.  I have 15 users who
 have over 200 personal contacts that need to be deleted.  I was told by
 IPswitch tech support that the only way to eliminate all of these entities

 from these users is to log on as these users and delete these contacs one
 at a time.

Can this possibly be correct?  I'm assuming there's a reason that the
 individual contacts are being stored in the master database... There IS a
 reason, correct?  The nice part about doing so is that you can delete the
 user accounts, re-add the accounts, and the erroneous information is still

 present.  Any ideas?  Any utilities on the way?  This just seems so
 completely half baked that I'm at a loss for words...


 -Gil



 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
 List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
 Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.03 is it safe?

[Kevin Gillis]

hi kevin,

would it be okay to export this file (csv to spreadsheet or other) so that
you can sort/filter as you wish?

bye for now,

kg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kevin Rogers
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 11:26 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.03 is it safe?


I would definitely like a screen that showed a spreadsheet-like view of
the spool, including when the file arrived, who from, who to, perhaps
even a reason it's still in the queue.  All sortable by every field
(date, from, to, filename, reason it's there).

Kevin

Kevin Gillis wrote:
 hi joe,

 let me check some more into the first item about seeing every file in
 the spool.  sometimes the spool can get quite large and may take some
 time to load.  would you want to sort or filter?   would other folks
 find this information valuable - list of every file, size, date
 created, sender/receiver?

 for the second, Add to Address Book , we'll be looking at that one -
 sounds like it comes up several times and is one of the remaining
 parity items.  definitely is a time saver!

 bye for now,

 kg

 -Original Message-
 *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of *Joe
 Wolf / Internet Specialists, LLC
 *Sent:* Tuesday, April 04, 2006 11:13 AM
 *To:* Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
 *Subject:* Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.03 is it safe?

 I would like to see every file in the spool, how long it has been
 there, the size, who it's from and who it's to.  Now we just have
 a summary... worthless.

 Another example on the web messaging:  You're viewing a file in
 web messaging.  In older versions you could click one button to
 add the sender to your address book.  With 2006.03 you can't even
 tell who the message is from!  Not listed unless you show headers,
 and then users are lost.  If they're good enough to figure out who
 the message actually came from then they have to cut and paste to
 put into their address book.

 You should show the from email address as a default, and have an
 Add to Address Book button.  Shouldn't this be basic stuff?

 -Joe

 - Original Message -
 *From:* Kevin Gillis mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 *To:* Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
 mailto:Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
 *Sent:* Tuesday, April 04, 2006 9:44 AM
 *Subject:* RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.03 is it safe?

 hi joe,

 lots of good points!

 we are in the process of adding licensing status to the
 interfaces (e.g. Trial with 10 days remaining or Activated
 on xx date).  we also plan to stuff the Serial Number in a
 new About box coming later this year.

 yes, there are some parity issues in the web messaging and we
 are in the process of addressing several of these (like the
 disk space indicator, link to web calendar, login page options
 like remember me).

 regarding the health of the server, what type of information
 would you like to see?
 it's nearly impossible to figure out what's actually going on
 with the server at any given time.

 bye for now,

 kg

 -Original Message-
 *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
 *Joe Wolf / Internet Specialists, LLC
 *Sent:* Tuesday, April 04, 2006 8:54 AM
 *To:* Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
 *Subject:* Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.03 is it safe?

 Overall 2006.03 has been stable, but there are still many
 features missing in the webmail system.  The admin
 interface is not as good as the old one, and it's nearly
 impossible to figure out what's actually going on with the
 server at any given time.

 As for the activations... this has been a pain in my side
 from the beginning.  I've had to call, email, and beg for
 more activations.  Each patch, or repair install requires
 a new activation on my server.  I have never been
 successful in activating via the built in interface... I
 have to use the web based offline activation.  I suppose
 they must use a port that I have blocked, but I don't know
 for sure.  There's no easy way to tell if your install is
 activated or not.  All in all, I'd say the activation
 process was reason enough not to use Imail, but maybe
 others may have better experiences.  So far I bet I've
 been forced to activate at least 12 times... all manually,
 and all but ther first two I had to beg Ipswitch to give
 me more.

 -Joe

 - Original Message -
 *From:* Eric

RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.03 is it safe?

[Kevin Gillis]

Hi 
Dave,

Thanks 
for taking the time to write up your comments.

Regarding this:

Finally, individual users who had created 
groups for large e-mailing lost the ability to create new groups and previous 
groups under version 8 were no longer useable
==KG Groups that had already been created in 8.xx 
should continue to work with IMail 2006, you just can't create new ones, 
yet. The ability to create groups is one of our top parity items 
that we have on the roadmap and will be looking at after the .04 release ships 
later this month.

On the positive side, it does have some nice 
interface features... It is cleaner and the SPAM features appear to be 
better. The antivirus seems to work very nicely in the 
background.
==KG Yes, the AV and AS are nice and 
we are upgrading the Anti-Spam in the 2006.05 release currently in 
development. The new AS will befaster, catch more spam (especially 
ones with .gifs embedded) and we're also looking into ability to let you set the 
frequency that the AS signatures are delivered. the default is every 10 
mins and the average size of the signature is small, about 3-4KB, but some folks 
want to set it to be less frequent.

bye 
for now,

kg

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of David 
  LarocheSent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 11:20 AMTo: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.03 is 
  it safe?
  I did upgrade from 8 to version 2006.
  We did run into some issues because our e-mail server was also a web server 
  for our school. This required help from customer service (took way too 
  long over the phone) to resolve. We needed to keep using port 8383 for 
  the e-mail server and did not want to dedicate the server just to e-mail.
  When we upgraded to from 2006 to version 2006.3 we lost our link to Web 
  Admin because we still had to use port 8383. According to Ipswith tech 
  support (e-mail), this would not work because it could not be used because the 
  new installation could not use PORTS???
  Finally, individual users who had created groups for large e-mailing lost 
  the ability to create new groups and previous groups under version 8 were no 
  longer usuable. Why they took that feature out I will never know
  On the positive side, it does have some nice interface features... It 
  is cleaner and the SPAM features appear to be better. The antivirus 
  seems to wokr very nicely in the background.
  Dave L.-Original Message-From: "Marc Catuogno" 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent 3/31/2006 11:30:55 AMTo: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] 2006.03 is it 
  safe?I have the service contract and have the ability to upgrade, is 
  it worth it?I have about 600 active users (about 1,000 accounts), most 
  of whom are usingthe web mail. The server processes about 10k messages a 
  day. Is 2006.3stable and quick enough to handle this?I haven't 
  heard about TOO many issues, but I'm wondering if that is becauseno one is 
  leaving 8.22.Marc---[This E-mail scanned for viruses by 
  Declude Virus]To Unsubscribe: 
  http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.htmlList Archive: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/Knowledge 
  Base/FAQ: 
http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.03 is it safe?

[Kevin Gillis]

hi david,

thanks for your post.

some comments below:

ADMIN:
1) easily viewing user total message count and total disk usage. You can
still see disk usage.
Msg count is simply gone.
==KG So you want to see msg count per user/domain/other?

WEB MESSAGING:
1) graphic display of disk usage/available for the client.
==KG We are planning to bring this back, probably in the 2006.05 release
which we are currently working on.

bye for now,

kg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Penrose
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 11:55 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.03 is it safe?


We are experiencing occasional and seemingly random failures of the left
panel display which makes messaging inoperable. Seems to be far less
frequent with 2006.03 than 2006.02. Also, we recently experienced an
inability for any users to logon to web messaging. Had to reinstall (repair)
2006.03 to resolve.

There are also some administrative features that are lost in 2006.x that
were available in 8.x. One that we miss is easily viewing user total message
count and total disk usage. You can still see disk usage. Though, it is a
list of files and corresponding sizes. You need to manually sum the files to
determine total disk foot print. Msg count is simply gone. The other
drawback to the new web-based admin tool is the slo response. When you
have many administrative tasks to perform, the Windows tool was superior in
speed to this web admin tool. Kiss the Windows admin tool goodbye when you
upgrade to 2006.x

Some of our web messaging users like the new client interface, others don't
like it. Oh yes, another feature lost in this upgrade is the graphic
display of disk usage/available for the client. Gone. Users do not know when
they are near capacity any longer, with the exception of using the Full
Mailbox Notification. The disk usage graphic was a very useful tool that
just disappeared.

_
David Penrose
Top Network LLC
206.529.4128 v
206.202.3776 f



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Catuogno
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 8:31 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] 2006.03 is it safe?


I have the service contract and have the ability to upgrade, is it worth it?

I have about 600 active users (about 1,000 accounts), most of whom are using
the web mail. The server processes about 10k messages a day. Is 2006.3
stable and quick enough to handle this?

I haven't heard about TOO many issues, but I'm wondering if that is because
no one is leaving 8.22.

Marc

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.03 is it safe?

[Kevin Gillis]

hi 
joe,

let me 
check some more into the first item about seeing every file in the spool. 
sometimes the spool can get quite large and may take some time to load. 
would you want to sort or filter? would other folks find this 
information valuable - list of every file, size, date created, 
sender/receiver?

for 
the second, "Add to Address Book" , we'll be 
looking at that one - sounds like it comes up several times and is one of the 
remaining parity items. definitely is a time saver!

bye 
for now,

kg

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Joe Wolf / 
  Internet Specialists, LLCSent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 11:13 
  AMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail 
  Forum] 2006.03 is it safe?
  I would like to see every file in the spool, how long it 
  has been there, the size, who it's from and who it's to. Now we just 
  have a summary... worthless. 
  
  Another example on the web messaging: You're 
  viewing a file in web messaging. In older versions you could click one 
  button to add the sender to your address book. With 2006.03 you can't 
  even tell who the message is from! Not listed unless you show headers, 
  and then users are lost. If they're good enough to figure out who the 
  message actually came from then they have to cut and paste to put into their 
  address book. 
  
  You should show the from email address as a default, and 
  have an "Add to Address Book" button. Shouldn't this be basic 
  stuff? 
  
  -Joe
  
- Original Message ----- 
From: 
    Kevin 
Gillis 
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 

Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 9:44 
AM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.03 is 
it safe?

hi 
joe,

lots of good points!

we 
are in the process of adding licensing status to the interfaces (e.g. "Trial 
with 10 days remaining" or "Activated on xx date"). we also plan to 
stuff the Serial Number in a new About box coming later this 
year.

yes, there are some parity issues in the web messaging and we are in 
the process of addressing several of these (like the disk space indicator, 
link to web calendar, login page options like "remember 
me").

regarding the health of the server, what type of information would 
you like to see?
"it's nearly impossible to figure out 
what's actually going on with the server at any given 
time."

bye for now,

kg

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Joe Wolf / 
  Internet Specialists, LLCSent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 8:54 
  AMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: 
  [IMail Forum] 2006.03 is it safe?
  Overall 2006.03 has been stable, but there are still 
  many features missing in the webmail system. The admin interface is 
  not as good as the old one, and it's nearly impossible to figure out 
  what's actually going on with the server at any given time.
  
  As for the activations... this has been a pain in my 
  side from the beginning. I've had to call, email, and beg for more 
  activations. Each patch, or repair install requires a new activation 
  on my server. I have never been successful in activating via the 
  built in interface... I have to use the web based offline 
  activation. I suppose they must use a port that I have blocked, but 
  I don't know for sure. There's no easy way to tell if your install 
  is activated or not. All in all, I'd say the activation process was 
  reason enough not to use Imail, but maybe others may have better 
  experiences. So far I bet I've been forced to activate at least 12 
  times... all manually, and all but ther first two I had to beg Ipswitch to 
  give me more.
  
  -Joe
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Eric Shanbrom 
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 

Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 7:42 
AM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.03 
is it safe?

Bruce,

If you contact our Customer Service group 
they can make more activations available. By default we allow you 2 but 
in most cases we can extend that.

Eric S

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Bruce Barnes 
  To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 
  
  Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 6:31 
  PM
  Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 
  2006.03 is it safe?
  
  Kevin,
  
  I am in the process of moving my current 
  installation of IMail from our current server to a new mail server, 
  porting the accounts and data and then doing an update from 8.22 to 
   

RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.03 is it safe?

[Kevin Gillis]

hi 
joe,

lots 
of good points!

we are 
in the process of adding licensing status to the interfaces (e.g. "Trial with 10 
days remaining" or "Activated on xx date"). we also plan to stuff the 
Serial Number in a new About box coming later this year.

yes, 
there are some parity issues in the web messaging and we are in the process of 
addressing several of these (like the disk space indicator, link to web 
calendar, login page options like "remember me").

regarding the health of the server, what type of information would you 
like to see?
"it's nearly impossible to figure out what's actually going 
on with the server at any given time."

bye 
for now,

kg

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Joe Wolf / 
  Internet Specialists, LLCSent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 8:54 
  AMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail 
  Forum] 2006.03 is it safe?
  Overall 2006.03 has been stable, but there are still 
  many features missing in the webmail system. The admin interface is not 
  as good as the old one, and it's nearly impossible to figure out what's 
  actually going on with the server at any given time.
  
  As for the activations... this has been a pain in my 
  side from the beginning. I've had to call, email, and beg for more 
  activations. Each patch, or repair install requires a new activation on 
  my server. I have never been successful in activating via the built in 
  interface... I have to use the web based offline activation. I suppose 
  they must use a port that I have blocked, but I don't know for sure. 
  There's no easy way to tell if your install is activated or not. All in 
  all, I'd say the activation process was reason enough not to use Imail, but 
  maybe others may have better experiences. So far I bet I've been forced 
  to activate at least 12 times... all manually, and all but ther first two I 
  had to beg Ipswitch to give me more.
  
  -Joe
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Eric Shanbrom 
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 

Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 7:42 
AM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.03 is 
it safe?

Bruce,

If you contact our Customer Service group they 
can make more activations available. By default we allow you 2 but in most 
cases we can extend that.

Eric S

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Bruce Barnes 
  To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 
  
  Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 6:31 
  PM
  Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.03 is 
  it safe?
  
  Kevin,
  
  I am in the process of moving my current 
  installation of IMail from our current server to a new mail server, 
  porting the accounts and data and then doing an update from 8.22 to 
  2006.4
  
  Unfortunately, my current serial number, 001001 
  712945 631696 723802 499805, does not allow me to do another installation 
  to the new server.
  
  Can this be adjusted to allow another 
  installation to the new server so I can make it live and then do the 
  upgrade to 2006?
  
  Our current service agreement is: 
  
  
  Thanks in advance for your 
  assistance
  Bruce Barnes
  ChicagoNetTech Inc
  3401 W Beach Ave
  Chicago IL 60651-2332
  Office: 773.491.9019
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin 
  GillisSent: Friday, March 31, 2006 13:25To: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.03 
  is it safe?
  
  hi all,
  
  as with previous releases, we'll be demoing the upcoming IMail 
  2006.05 release in a few weeks - demoing all the new features completed in 
  the last month and taking feedback on how to improve/refine the new 
  features.
  
  bye for now,
  
  kg
  
-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Tripp 
AllenSent: Friday, March 31, 2006 1:51 PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] 
2006.03 is it safe?
More likely .05.

Tripp


  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Matrosity Hosting 
  To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 
  
  Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 1:16 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 
  2006.03 is it safe?
  .04?Tripp Allen wrote: 
  We are working to add that feature in a future release. 
Tripp - Original Message - From: "Bonno 
Bloksma" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 12:46 PM Subject: Re: [IMail 
Forum] 2006.03 is it safe? 
Hi, [] Oh yes, another 
  feature "lost" in 

RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.03 is it safe?

[Kevin Gillis]

hi 
all,

as 
with previous releases, we'll be demoing the upcoming IMail 2006.05 release in a 
few weeks - demoing all the new features completed in the last month and taking 
feedback on how to improve/refine the new features.

bye 
for now,

kg

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Tripp 
  AllenSent: Friday, March 31, 2006 1:51 PMTo: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.03 is 
  it safe?
  More likely .05.
  
  Tripp
  
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Matrosity 
Hosting 
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 

Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 1:16 
PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.03 is 
it safe?
.04?Tripp Allen wrote: 
We 
  are working to add that feature in a future release. Tripp 
  - Original Message - From: "Bonno Bloksma" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 
  Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 12:46 PM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 
  2006.03 is it safe? 
  Hi, [] Oh yes, another feature 
"lost" in this upgrade is the graphic display of disk 
usage/available for the client. Gone. Users do not know when they 
are near capacity any longer, with the exception of using the Full 
Mailbox Notification. The disk usage graphic was a very useful tool 
that just disappeared. Oop, that's a feature we would realy 
WANT to have back. We have a lot of students that have mailboxes near 
the limit. They "constanly" need to know when they are too close to th 
elimit. Kevin, is it on the list already to be re-added? 
Groetjes, Bonno Bloksma --- [E-mail 
scanned at tio.nl for viruses by Declude Virus] To Unsubscribe: 
http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ 
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ 
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
  List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ 
  Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ 
  

RE: [IMail Forum] Blackberry Issue

[Kevin Gillis]

hi all,

sounds like some mixed stories on the blackberry front.

joe, just curious but what are you using for your mail client on your
blackberry and what version of imail?  are you forwarding to your bb or
popping directly to imail?

bye for now,

kg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Joseph Mann
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 7:20 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Blackberry Issue


We use Blackberry's (7250) exclusively with our sales department. Knock on
wood we haven't had a problem yet.

No special setup needed at least none that I have done.

-Joe

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Rogers
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 6:28 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Blackberry Issue

I've tried troubleshooting it, but often enough, the messages come
through.  It's very odd.  I can't isolate if it's a client issue, a
Blackberry issue, an Imail issue.

It's not uncommon, however.


Marc Catuogno wrote:
 Any insight on this?  A couple of my blackberry users on my server are
 beginning to complain about intermittent blank messages

 Marc

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bonno Bloksma
 Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 5:29 PM
 To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
 Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Blackberry Issue

 Hi,

 My boss has a blackberry and all mail:
 1) Is completely base64, even if it's plain text
 2) Has a plain text signature ending normally defined at the provider
 website
 3) Has a few extra bytes with random chars *after* the signature

 Don't know if that is because of an error at the provider (Vodafone NL) or
a

 blackberry problem. Nor wheter it has any relation to your problem. But
 maybe it get you thinking in the right direction.

 Groetjes,


 Bonno Bloksma

 - Original Message -
 From: Kevin Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
 Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 10:36 PM
 Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Blackberry Issue



 Does anyone have any insight into this Blackberry issue.  To recap:
bodies



 are stripped from any message sent from a Blackberry device UNLESS that
 message has an attachment (then the body is displayed correctly).  Below
 is a log snippet of an email with no attachment.  It appears OK to me.
 Thanks.


 Kevin Rogers wrote:

 Here is the log snippet.  I don't have the actual email file at this
 point, but I will have the user who received the blank email send it to
 me.  I did read at the Ipswitch online forums about someone who had the
 same problem (they said that it happened with any email *without* an
 attachment for some odd reason), but no one had responded to him.
Here's



 the log.  Any help would be appreciated.


 03:23 06:04 SMTPD(aad801a21470) [192.168.0.3] connect 204.107.47.175

 port 1053
 03:23 06:04 SMTPD(aad801a21470) [204.107.47.175] EHLO
 hnt02.healthnet.com
 03:23 06:04 SMTPD(aad801a21470) [204.107.47.175] MAIL
 FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 03:23 06:04 SMTPD(aad801a21470) [204.107.47.175] RCPT
 TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 03:23 06:04 SMTPD(aad801a21470) [204.107.47.175]
 C:\IMail\spool\Daad801a21470.SMD 3861
 03:23 06:04 SMTPD(aad801a21470) performing antispam checks
 03:23 06:04 SMTP-(aad801a21470) processing
 C:\IMail\spool\Qaad801a21470.SMD
 03:23 06:04 SMTP-(aad801a21470) ldeliver Rogersbenefit.com
 someone-main (1) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4399
 03:23 06:04 SMTP-(aad801a21470) finished
 C:\IMail\spool\Qaad801a21470.SMD status=1



 Matti Haack wrote:



 Matti Haack wrote:

 What do you mean by the source?  The log entries?  The email itself
 (the
 .eml file)?


 As much information as possible...
 Logs and the mail itself would be helpful...

 Matti

 -
 Matti Haack - Hit Haack IT Service Gmbh
 Poltlbauer Weg 4, D-94036 Passau
 +49 851 50477-22 Fax: +49 851 50477-29
 http://www.haack-it.de



 Dieses Dokument ist ausschliesslich fuer den Adressaten bestimmt.
 Jegliche Art von Reproduktion, Verbreitung, Vervielfaeltigung,
 Modifikation, Verteilung und/oder Publikation dieser E-Mail-Nachricht
 ist untersagt, soweit dies nicht  ausdruecklich genehmigt wurde.
 Jegliche Haftung fur Ansprueche,  die aufgrund der Kommunikation per
 E-Mail begruendet werden koennten, ist ausgeschlossen, soweit der
 Haftungsausschluss gesetzlich zulaessig ist. -- Ausgehende E-Mail wurde

 auf Viren gescannt  --
 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
 List Archive:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
 Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses.]





 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses.]

 To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
 List Archive:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
 Knowledge Base/FAQ: 

RE: [IMail Forum] 2006 Listserver

[Kevin Gillis]

hi 
bill,

thanks.

this 
is more market research than anything and we can't tackle all of these but 
curiouswhatfolks have a preference/priority:

1. 
ability to add/delete single user to/from multiple lists 
simultaneously
2. 
double opt-in/opt-out 
3. 
bounce mgt
4. 
ability to add/delete multiple users to/from single list 
simultaneously
5. 
customizing signatures per list
6. 
other - please explain

bye 
for now,

kg

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Matrosity 
  HostingSent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 10:39 AMTo: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006 
  Listserver[Kevin 
  Gillis]
  Matrosity 
  Hosting [EMAIL PROTECTED]yeahKevin Gillis wrote: 
  

hi 
bill,

so 
on bounce (or x bounces), auto remove from list?

bye for now,

kg

  -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On 
  Behalf Of Matrosity HostingSent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 
  9:01 AMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: 
  Re: [IMail Forum] 2006 Listserver[Kevin Gillis]Matrosity Hosting [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]bounce management would be at the top of our 
  list.Thanks,BillKevin Gillis wrote: 
  Hello Ben,

thanks for your feedback.

would it be possible to provide a top 3 lists of features you are looking
for in the listserver?

bye for now,

kg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Imail Admin
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 8:03 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006 Listserver


Amazing.  It's like buying a new Lexus hybrid and then discovering it only
has an AM radio with one in-dash speaker.

Ben

- Original Message -
From: "Eric Shanbrom" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 5:57 AM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006 Listserver


  
still the same.

Eric S
- Original Message -
From: "IMail Admin" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 8:40 AM
Subject: [IMail Forum] 2006 Listserver



  Hi,

It just struck me: can someone tell me how the list server is IMail 2006
compares to the list server in prior versions?

Are needs for a list server have always been modest, so it was never
  worth
  

  it for us to invest in a separate, more powerful program.  On the other
hand, IMail's list server has always primitive, and we're always wished
they would upgrade it.  Hence my question.

Thanks,

Ben
BC Web

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
  

  Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

  To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


  

RE: [IMail Forum] 2006 Listserver

[Kevin Gillis]

hi 
bill,

so on 
bounce (or x bounces), auto remove from list?

bye 
for now,

kg

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Matrosity 
  HostingSent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 9:01 AMTo: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006 
  Listserver[Kevin Gillis]Matrosity Hosting 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]bounce management would be at the top of our 
  list.Thanks,BillKevin Gillis wrote: 
  Hello Ben,

thanks for your feedback.

would it be possible to provide a top 3 lists of features you are looking
for in the listserver?

bye for now,

kg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Imail Admin
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 8:03 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006 Listserver


Amazing.  It's like buying a new Lexus hybrid and then discovering it only
has an AM radio with one in-dash speaker.

Ben

- Original Message -
From: "Eric Shanbrom" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 5:57 AM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006 Listserver


  
still the same.

Eric S
- Original Message -
From: "IMail Admin" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 8:40 AM
Subject: [IMail Forum] 2006 Listserver



  Hi,

It just struck me: can someone tell me how the list server is IMail 2006
compares to the list server in prior versions?

Are needs for a list server have always been modest, so it was never
  worth
  

  it for us to invest in a separate, more powerful program.  On the other
hand, IMail's list server has always primitive, and we're always wished
they would upgrade it.  Hence my question.

Thanks,

Ben
BC Web

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
  

  Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

  To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/