[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-14495) Distinct aggregation cannot be used in the having clause
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15275100#comment-15275100
]
Apache Spark commented on SPARK-14495:
--
User 'xwu0226' has created a pull request for this issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12974
> Distinct aggregation cannot be used in the having clause
>
>
> Key: SPARK-14495
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14495
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: SQL
>Affects Versions: 1.6.1
>Reporter: Yin Huai
>
> {code}
> select date, count(distinct id)
> from (select '2010-01-01' as date, 1 as id) tmp
> group by date
> having count(distinct id) > 0;
> org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: resolved attribute(s) gid#558,id#559
> missing from date#554,id#555 in operator !Expand [List(date#554, null, 0, if
> ((gid#558 = 1)) id#559 else null),List(date#554, id#555, 1, null)],
> [date#554,id#561,gid#560,if ((gid = 1)) id else null#562];
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$class.failAnalysis(CheckAnalysis.scala:38)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer.failAnalysis(Analyzer.scala:44)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$$anonfun$checkAnalysis$1.apply(CheckAnalysis.scala:183)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$$anonfun$checkAnalysis$1.apply(CheckAnalysis.scala:50)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:121)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:318)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:318)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:318)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:318)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$class.checkAnalysis(CheckAnalysis.scala:50)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer.checkAnalysis(Analyzer.scala:44)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution.assertAnalyzed(QueryExecution.scala:34)
> at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame.(DataFrame.scala:133)
> at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame$.apply(DataFrame.scala:52)
> at org.apache.spark.sql.SQLContext.sql(SQLContext.scala:816)
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-14495) Distinct aggregation cannot be used in the having clause
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15271956#comment-15271956
]
Xin Wu commented on SPARK-14495:
[~smilegator] I got the fix and running regtest now. Will submit the PR one it
is done.
> Distinct aggregation cannot be used in the having clause
>
>
> Key: SPARK-14495
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14495
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: SQL
>Affects Versions: 1.6.1
>Reporter: Yin Huai
>
> {code}
> select date, count(distinct id)
> from (select '2010-01-01' as date, 1 as id) tmp
> group by date
> having count(distinct id) > 0;
> org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: resolved attribute(s) gid#558,id#559
> missing from date#554,id#555 in operator !Expand [List(date#554, null, 0, if
> ((gid#558 = 1)) id#559 else null),List(date#554, id#555, 1, null)],
> [date#554,id#561,gid#560,if ((gid = 1)) id else null#562];
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$class.failAnalysis(CheckAnalysis.scala:38)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer.failAnalysis(Analyzer.scala:44)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$$anonfun$checkAnalysis$1.apply(CheckAnalysis.scala:183)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$$anonfun$checkAnalysis$1.apply(CheckAnalysis.scala:50)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:121)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:318)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:318)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:318)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:318)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$class.checkAnalysis(CheckAnalysis.scala:50)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer.checkAnalysis(Analyzer.scala:44)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution.assertAnalyzed(QueryExecution.scala:34)
> at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame.(DataFrame.scala:133)
> at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame$.apply(DataFrame.scala:52)
> at org.apache.spark.sql.SQLContext.sql(SQLContext.scala:816)
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-14495) Distinct aggregation cannot be used in the having clause
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15266069#comment-15266069
]
Xin Wu commented on SPARK-14495:
I can recreated it on branch-1.6. and another workaround is using alias for the
aggregate expression
{code}
scala> sqlContext.sql("SELECT date, count(distinct id) as cnt from (select
'2010-01-01' as date, 1 as id) tmp group by date having cnt > 0").show
+--+---+
| date|cnt|
+--+---+
|2010-01-01| 1|
+--+---+
{code}
> Distinct aggregation cannot be used in the having clause
>
>
> Key: SPARK-14495
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14495
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: SQL
>Affects Versions: 1.6.1
>Reporter: Yin Huai
>
> {code}
> select date, count(distinct id)
> from (select '2010-01-01' as date, 1 as id) tmp
> group by date
> having count(distinct id) > 0;
> org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: resolved attribute(s) gid#558,id#559
> missing from date#554,id#555 in operator !Expand [List(date#554, null, 0, if
> ((gid#558 = 1)) id#559 else null),List(date#554, id#555, 1, null)],
> [date#554,id#561,gid#560,if ((gid = 1)) id else null#562];
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$class.failAnalysis(CheckAnalysis.scala:38)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer.failAnalysis(Analyzer.scala:44)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$$anonfun$checkAnalysis$1.apply(CheckAnalysis.scala:183)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$$anonfun$checkAnalysis$1.apply(CheckAnalysis.scala:50)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:121)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:318)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:318)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:318)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:318)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$class.checkAnalysis(CheckAnalysis.scala:50)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer.checkAnalysis(Analyzer.scala:44)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution.assertAnalyzed(QueryExecution.scala:34)
> at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame.(DataFrame.scala:133)
> at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame$.apply(DataFrame.scala:52)
> at org.apache.spark.sql.SQLContext.sql(SQLContext.scala:816)
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-14495) Distinct aggregation cannot be used in the having clause
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15265203#comment-15265203
]
Xiao Li commented on SPARK-14495:
-
Sure, will do it. Thanks!
> Distinct aggregation cannot be used in the having clause
>
>
> Key: SPARK-14495
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14495
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: SQL
>Affects Versions: 1.6.1
>Reporter: Yin Huai
>
> {code}
> select date, count(distinct id)
> from (select '2010-01-01' as date, 1 as id) tmp
> group by date
> having count(distinct id) > 0;
> org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: resolved attribute(s) gid#558,id#559
> missing from date#554,id#555 in operator !Expand [List(date#554, null, 0, if
> ((gid#558 = 1)) id#559 else null),List(date#554, id#555, 1, null)],
> [date#554,id#561,gid#560,if ((gid = 1)) id else null#562];
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$class.failAnalysis(CheckAnalysis.scala:38)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer.failAnalysis(Analyzer.scala:44)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$$anonfun$checkAnalysis$1.apply(CheckAnalysis.scala:183)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$$anonfun$checkAnalysis$1.apply(CheckAnalysis.scala:50)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:121)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:318)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:318)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:318)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:318)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$class.checkAnalysis(CheckAnalysis.scala:50)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer.checkAnalysis(Analyzer.scala:44)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution.assertAnalyzed(QueryExecution.scala:34)
> at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame.(DataFrame.scala:133)
> at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame$.apply(DataFrame.scala:52)
> at org.apache.spark.sql.SQLContext.sql(SQLContext.scala:816)
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-14495) Distinct aggregation cannot be used in the having clause
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15264838#comment-15264838
]
Reynold Xin commented on SPARK-14495:
-
cc [~smilegator] want to find somebody from your side to fix this for
branch-1.6?
> Distinct aggregation cannot be used in the having clause
>
>
> Key: SPARK-14495
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14495
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: SQL
>Affects Versions: 1.6.1
>Reporter: Yin Huai
>
> {code}
> select date, count(distinct id)
> from (select '2010-01-01' as date, 1 as id) tmp
> group by date
> having count(distinct id) > 0;
> org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: resolved attribute(s) gid#558,id#559
> missing from date#554,id#555 in operator !Expand [List(date#554, null, 0, if
> ((gid#558 = 1)) id#559 else null),List(date#554, id#555, 1, null)],
> [date#554,id#561,gid#560,if ((gid = 1)) id else null#562];
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$class.failAnalysis(CheckAnalysis.scala:38)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer.failAnalysis(Analyzer.scala:44)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$$anonfun$checkAnalysis$1.apply(CheckAnalysis.scala:183)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$$anonfun$checkAnalysis$1.apply(CheckAnalysis.scala:50)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:121)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:318)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:318)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:318)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:318)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$class.checkAnalysis(CheckAnalysis.scala:50)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer.checkAnalysis(Analyzer.scala:44)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution.assertAnalyzed(QueryExecution.scala:34)
> at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame.(DataFrame.scala:133)
> at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame$.apply(DataFrame.scala:52)
> at org.apache.spark.sql.SQLContext.sql(SQLContext.scala:816)
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-14495) Distinct aggregation cannot be used in the having clause
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15239674#comment-15239674
]
Cheng Lian commented on SPARK-14495:
This ticket is for branch-1.6.
> Distinct aggregation cannot be used in the having clause
>
>
> Key: SPARK-14495
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14495
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: SQL
>Affects Versions: 1.6.1
>Reporter: Yin Huai
>
> {code}
> select date, count(distinct id)
> from (select '2010-01-01' as date, 1 as id) tmp
> group by date
> having count(distinct id) > 0;
> org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: resolved attribute(s) gid#558,id#559
> missing from date#554,id#555 in operator !Expand [List(date#554, null, 0, if
> ((gid#558 = 1)) id#559 else null),List(date#554, id#555, 1, null)],
> [date#554,id#561,gid#560,if ((gid = 1)) id else null#562];
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$class.failAnalysis(CheckAnalysis.scala:38)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer.failAnalysis(Analyzer.scala:44)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$$anonfun$checkAnalysis$1.apply(CheckAnalysis.scala:183)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$$anonfun$checkAnalysis$1.apply(CheckAnalysis.scala:50)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:121)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:318)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:318)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:318)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:318)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$class.checkAnalysis(CheckAnalysis.scala:50)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer.checkAnalysis(Analyzer.scala:44)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution.assertAnalyzed(QueryExecution.scala:34)
> at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame.(DataFrame.scala:133)
> at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame$.apply(DataFrame.scala:52)
> at org.apache.spark.sql.SQLContext.sql(SQLContext.scala:816)
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-14495) Distinct aggregation cannot be used in the having clause
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15235188#comment-15235188
]
Liang-Chi Hsieh commented on SPARK-14495:
-
I can' reproduce this bug with current master branch. The query can work.
{code}
test("distinct aggregatiom in having clause") {
checkAnswer(
sql(
"""
|SELECT date, count(distinct id) FROM (SELECT '2010-01-01' AS date, 1
AS id)
|tmp GROUP BY date HAVING count(distinct id) > 0
""".stripMargin),
Row("2010-01-01", 1) :: Nil)
}
{code}
> Distinct aggregation cannot be used in the having clause
>
>
> Key: SPARK-14495
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14495
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: SQL
>Affects Versions: 1.6.1
>Reporter: Yin Huai
>
> {code}
> select date, count(distinct id)
> from (select '2010-01-01' as date, 1 as id) tmp
> group by date
> having count(distinct id) > 0;
> org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: resolved attribute(s) gid#558,id#559
> missing from date#554,id#555 in operator !Expand [List(date#554, null, 0, if
> ((gid#558 = 1)) id#559 else null),List(date#554, id#555, 1, null)],
> [date#554,id#561,gid#560,if ((gid = 1)) id else null#562];
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$class.failAnalysis(CheckAnalysis.scala:38)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer.failAnalysis(Analyzer.scala:44)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$$anonfun$checkAnalysis$1.apply(CheckAnalysis.scala:183)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$$anonfun$checkAnalysis$1.apply(CheckAnalysis.scala:50)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:121)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:318)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:318)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:318)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:318)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$class.checkAnalysis(CheckAnalysis.scala:50)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer.checkAnalysis(Analyzer.scala:44)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution.assertAnalyzed(QueryExecution.scala:34)
> at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame.(DataFrame.scala:133)
> at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame$.apply(DataFrame.scala:52)
> at org.apache.spark.sql.SQLContext.sql(SQLContext.scala:816)
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-14495) Distinct aggregation cannot be used in the having clause
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15234538#comment-15234538
]
Liang-Chi Hsieh commented on SPARK-14495:
-
I've tried this query in my PR (https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12138) for
Expand operator. It can solve this issue too.
> Distinct aggregation cannot be used in the having clause
>
>
> Key: SPARK-14495
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14495
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: SQL
>Affects Versions: 1.6.1
>Reporter: Yin Huai
>
> {code}
> select date, count(distinct id)
> from (select '2010-01-01' as date, 1 as id) tmp
> group by date
> having count(distinct id) > 0;
> org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: resolved attribute(s) gid#558,id#559
> missing from date#554,id#555 in operator !Expand [List(date#554, null, 0, if
> ((gid#558 = 1)) id#559 else null),List(date#554, id#555, 1, null)],
> [date#554,id#561,gid#560,if ((gid = 1)) id else null#562];
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$class.failAnalysis(CheckAnalysis.scala:38)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer.failAnalysis(Analyzer.scala:44)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$$anonfun$checkAnalysis$1.apply(CheckAnalysis.scala:183)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$$anonfun$checkAnalysis$1.apply(CheckAnalysis.scala:50)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:121)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:318)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:318)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:318)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:318)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$class.checkAnalysis(CheckAnalysis.scala:50)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer.checkAnalysis(Analyzer.scala:44)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution.assertAnalyzed(QueryExecution.scala:34)
> at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame.(DataFrame.scala:133)
> at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame$.apply(DataFrame.scala:52)
> at org.apache.spark.sql.SQLContext.sql(SQLContext.scala:816)
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-14495) Distinct aggregation cannot be used in the having clause
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15232717#comment-15232717
]
Yin Huai commented on SPARK-14495:
--
The current workaround is to use a subquery and then use where.
> Distinct aggregation cannot be used in the having clause
>
>
> Key: SPARK-14495
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14495
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: SQL
>Affects Versions: 1.6.1
>Reporter: Yin Huai
>
> {code}
> select date, count(distinct id)
> from (select '2010-01-01' as date, 1 as id) tmp
> group by date
> having count(distinct id) > 0;
> org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: resolved attribute(s) gid#558,id#559
> missing from date#554,id#555 in operator !Expand [List(date#554, null, 0, if
> ((gid#558 = 1)) id#559 else null),List(date#554, id#555, 1, null)],
> [date#554,id#561,gid#560,if ((gid = 1)) id else null#562];
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$class.failAnalysis(CheckAnalysis.scala:38)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer.failAnalysis(Analyzer.scala:44)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$$anonfun$checkAnalysis$1.apply(CheckAnalysis.scala:183)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$$anonfun$checkAnalysis$1.apply(CheckAnalysis.scala:50)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:121)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:318)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:318)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:318)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$foreachUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:318)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:120)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$class.checkAnalysis(CheckAnalysis.scala:50)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer.checkAnalysis(Analyzer.scala:44)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution.assertAnalyzed(QueryExecution.scala:34)
> at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame.(DataFrame.scala:133)
> at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame$.apply(DataFrame.scala:52)
> at org.apache.spark.sql.SQLContext.sql(SQLContext.scala:816)
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
