[kde] 'fancy tasks' settings

2012-01-16 Thread xPol
'fancy tasks' settings changes cannot be saved, kde 4.7.2

any ideas?

thank you
Paolo

___
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management:  https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.


Re: [kde] 'fancy tasks' settings

2012-01-16 Thread gpe

On 16/01/12 14:15, Anne Wilson wrote:



It's not clear what you mean by fancy tasks - can you clarify?


Fancy Task is a plasmoid.

http://kde-look.org/content/show.php/Fancy+Tasks?content=99737

Paolo, you may want to leave comment on the plasmoid website.

--
Regards
gpe
___
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management:  https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.


Re: [kde] 'fancy tasks' settings

2012-01-16 Thread xPol
Anne Wilson wrote:

 On 16/01/12 08:14, xPol wrote:
 'fancy tasks' settings changes cannot be saved, kde 4.7.2
 
 any ideas?
 
 It's not clear what you mean by fancy tasks - can you clarify?
 
 Anne

Sorry, it is the 'fancy panel' settings

Paolo

___
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management:  https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.


Re: [kde] application in the dashboard?

2012-01-16 Thread Duncan
xPol posted on Sun, 15 Jan 2012 12:26:27 +0100 as excerpted:

 What is the command line to launch an application in the dashboard?
 Say, firefox.

The dashboard is basically a specially treated plasma desktop/activity.  
As such, like other plasma desktop activities and other plasma containers 
(like the panels) in general, it only runs specific plasma widgets, known 
as plasmoids, not general X applications like firefox.

There are various webkit-based browser plasmoids available for placement 
on the desktop or in the dashboard, that do allow browsing the web, etc, 
but as with all plasmoids, these run within the same plasma process 
context, not as separate apps, like firefox.

If you've not discovered it yet, try kde-look.org , which has quite a 
variety of plasmoids available to supplement the ones shipped with kde 
and your distribution by default.  That gives you many more choices, but 
AFAIK there's none that force a full-scale regular application (like 
firefox) to display in a plasmoid window, neither IMO would such an idea 
make that much sense, tho plasma does allow the functional replacement or 
embedding of smaller scale applets. especially those already developed 
with kde technology.  (Firefox, OTOH, is a gtk based app not a qt/kde app, 
thus making integration in the kde technology plasma even MORE 
difficult.  But as I said, there's qt-webkit based browser plasmoids 
available... but by definition they won't have the power and flexibility 
of a full-fledged stand-alone app, regardless of the toolkit (qt, gtk, 
tk, fltk, etc) they're based on.)

Hope that answers your question.

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master.  Richard Stallman

___
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management:  https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.


Re: [kde] [Okular-devel] [Bug 267350] filling out a PDF form saves data to some file i ~/.kde/share/apps/okular/docdata/

2012-01-16 Thread Duncan
Kevin Krammer posted on Sun, 15 Jan 2012 18:08:31 +0100 as excerpted:

 On Sunday, 2012-01-15, Dan Armbrust wrote:
  Hmm. Most software with autocompletion support does that. E.g.
  browsers,
  email programs.
 
 They also ask your permission first.
 
 Interesting. Neither Konqueror, Firefox, KMail or Thunderbird have asked
 me whether I wanted to store form data.
 Can you attach a screenshot of an application asking that?

I don't know about asking, but it's a preferences setting.  There's also 
the private browsing or whatever the app decides to call it, mode, 
where everything (cookies, form completion, browsing history, etc) is 
forgotten, tho that normally has to be specifically toggled on.

While I consider this is a good thing and would appreciate the option in 
okular as well, it's not something that fits well with the previously 
chosen example of a public kiosk, library computer, or other shared 
computer (my folks worked at a mission in El Salvador for awhile; 
everybody shared the same computer and could read email, etc, unless it 
was web-based, but of course then if the browser is set to save cookies 
and remember form-fills...), since because in most cases it doesn't 
prompt every time, a user accustomed to using a private computer and not 
worrying about it isn't likely to realize the danger and verify settings 
on a public computer, either.

I wonder how many facebook/myspace/twitter/etc users have had their 
accounts hacked simply thru use of a friend's computer or one at the 
library, and being careless about the remember me settings, etc, that 
most sites have (that usually control the site's cookie settings) on 
their logins?  Not to mention banks...  Sure, a responsible kiosk 
operator will have setup responsible settings, but then again, it could 
be argued that a responsible kiosk operator would wipe or entirely reimage 
between users, as well.  There's a lot of users caught-out that way, I'm 
sure.

So yes, I agree an option would be nice, and having a clear-data function 
would be EXCELLENT, but I don't believe the kiosk example was 
particularly apropos, given the commonly accepted behavior of most 
browsers, etc, extended to the same kiosk example.  

 And they have an off switch.
 And, they definitely don't autocomplete fields which are know to
 contain private info - aka - passwords.  Unless you go through another
 dialog telling it to remember the password.  And they give you a menu
 option to clear it.  And, most browsers now have a don't remember
 anything mode.
  Okular has none of those.
 
 Right, hence the recommendation for lobby for an implementation doing
 that.

Actually, I wonder if this idea could get a bit more traction in view of 
the new ksecrets thing?  That'd play off the whole fascination with the 
new and shiny technology thing, instead of being seen as the drudge-work 
that hooking up to kwallet or just implementing an ordinary don't-save 
option and clear-saved button.

That's where I'd try to take it at this point, since ksecrets IS new and 
shiny and fascinating! =:^)

  However I don't see any facts supporting the claim of virus like
  behavior.
 
 Hiding users data without permission and without the users knowledge
 certainly is virus like behavior.
 
 No, virus behavior is attaching itself with the purpose of distribution
 and spreading.
 I don't think Okular is doing either.

It seems he's using virus not in the technically narrow virus sense, 
but in the broader malware sense, inclusive of trojans, etc.  While 
okular really can't be considered a virus in the technically narrow sense 
(as you pointed out), certainly, the argument here is that it's behaving 
like a trojan, so if one accepts an extremely fuzzy definition of virus 
that really means something more like malware in general.  While I would 
have certainly chosen malware or trojan instead of virus, here, 
with a suitably fuzzy definition, I do see his point.

That said, while I see his position and certainly agree that a don't save 
data option and clear saved data button would be useful, I certainly 
don't consider it a problem on the order of, say, konqueror not having 
proper security certificate management for two years after kde was 
declared ready for ordinary users with 4.2... (finally fixed in 4.6, IIRC) 
in an era with both internet banking and the compromise of entire 
certificate authorities!  That was a FAR more serious breach of the 
public trust, IMO, while this one's an it would be nice thing, a rather 
vast difference in priority.  As I've stated before, the it's only a 
toy, use a real browser if it matters attitude toward konqueror is one 
of the big reasons I switched to firefox.

  I would recommend lobbying for secure storage of form completion data
  like other form completing programs do.
 
 I doubt it would help.
 
 I wouldn't be so sure.

Same here, particularly with the new ksecrets angle to explore.  If I 
were an okular dev I think I might jump on this one just