[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2051835] Re: [24.04 FEAT] Memory hotplug vmem pages (s390x)

2024-04-22 Thread Frank Heimes
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051835

Title:
  [24.04 FEAT] Memory hotplug vmem pages (s390x)

Status in Ubuntu on IBM z Systems:
  Fix Released
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Noble:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  The current s390 specific memory hotplug backend allocates 'struct page' 
management structures for all standby memory regions, when those standby 
regions are detected at ipl time.
  The reason for this is, that setting standby online memory is supposed to 
succeed especially in memory constrained environments, since lack of free 
memory is likely the reason why additional memory is brought online.
  If in such cases 'struct pages' would have to be allocated before memory 
could be brought up, this would likely fail, and contradict the whole rationale 
of memory hotplug.

  However pre-allocating memory for 'struct pages' comes with the
  downside that for highly unbalanced ratios of online/standby memory a
  system might even fail to ipl, because there is not enough memory
  available for all possible struct pages which are required for standby
  memory.

  The idea is to improve the situation: when standby memory is brought
  online, the memory for struct pages (and maybe other management
  structures) required for this new memory area should be taken from the
  online memory, instead of pre-allocating them.

  This would solve the problems with unbalanced ratios as described
  above.

  Note: there are intentions to tell customers that they should always
  define the maximum size of standby memory for their LPAR activation
  profiles. This would allow for maximum flexibility for all LPARs
  during runtime, given that the amount of standby memory cannot be
  changed during runtime.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/2051835/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2051835] Re: [24.04 FEAT] Memory hotplug vmem pages (s390x)

2024-04-21 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 6.8.0-31.31

---
linux (6.8.0-31.31) noble; urgency=medium

  * noble/linux: 6.8.0-31.31 -proposed tracker (LP: #2062933)

  * Packaging resync (LP: #1786013)
- [Packaging] debian.master/dkms-versions -- update from kernel-versions
  (main/d2024.04.04)

 -- Andrea Righi   Fri, 19 Apr 2024 23:46:38
+0200

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Noble)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051835

Title:
  [24.04 FEAT] Memory hotplug vmem pages (s390x)

Status in Ubuntu on IBM z Systems:
  In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Noble:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  The current s390 specific memory hotplug backend allocates 'struct page' 
management structures for all standby memory regions, when those standby 
regions are detected at ipl time.
  The reason for this is, that setting standby online memory is supposed to 
succeed especially in memory constrained environments, since lack of free 
memory is likely the reason why additional memory is brought online.
  If in such cases 'struct pages' would have to be allocated before memory 
could be brought up, this would likely fail, and contradict the whole rationale 
of memory hotplug.

  However pre-allocating memory for 'struct pages' comes with the
  downside that for highly unbalanced ratios of online/standby memory a
  system might even fail to ipl, because there is not enough memory
  available for all possible struct pages which are required for standby
  memory.

  The idea is to improve the situation: when standby memory is brought
  online, the memory for struct pages (and maybe other management
  structures) required for this new memory area should be taken from the
  online memory, instead of pre-allocating them.

  This would solve the problems with unbalanced ratios as described
  above.

  Note: there are intentions to tell customers that they should always
  define the maximum size of standby memory for their LPAR activation
  profiles. This would allow for maximum flexibility for all LPARs
  during runtime, given that the amount of standby memory cannot be
  changed during runtime.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/2051835/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2051835] Re: [24.04 FEAT] Memory hotplug vmem pages (s390x)

2024-04-02 Thread Frank Heimes
This is not incl. in Ubuntu-6.8.0-20.20, but will be included in the
next updated kernel.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051835

Title:
  [24.04 FEAT] Memory hotplug vmem pages (s390x)

Status in Ubuntu on IBM z Systems:
  In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Noble:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  The current s390 specific memory hotplug backend allocates 'struct page' 
management structures for all standby memory regions, when those standby 
regions are detected at ipl time.
  The reason for this is, that setting standby online memory is supposed to 
succeed especially in memory constrained environments, since lack of free 
memory is likely the reason why additional memory is brought online.
  If in such cases 'struct pages' would have to be allocated before memory 
could be brought up, this would likely fail, and contradict the whole rationale 
of memory hotplug.

  However pre-allocating memory for 'struct pages' comes with the
  downside that for highly unbalanced ratios of online/standby memory a
  system might even fail to ipl, because there is not enough memory
  available for all possible struct pages which are required for standby
  memory.

  The idea is to improve the situation: when standby memory is brought
  online, the memory for struct pages (and maybe other management
  structures) required for this new memory area should be taken from the
  online memory, instead of pre-allocating them.

  This would solve the problems with unbalanced ratios as described
  above.

  Note: there are intentions to tell customers that they should always
  define the maximum size of standby memory for their LPAR activation
  profiles. This would allow for maximum flexibility for all LPARs
  during runtime, given that the amount of standby memory cannot be
  changed during runtime.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/2051835/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2051835] Re: [24.04 FEAT] Memory hotplug vmem pages (s390x)

2024-03-20 Thread Frank Heimes
Got marked as APPLIED by kernel team (Paolo).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051835

Title:
  [24.04 FEAT] Memory hotplug vmem pages (s390x)

Status in Ubuntu on IBM z Systems:
  In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Noble:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  The current s390 specific memory hotplug backend allocates 'struct page' 
management structures for all standby memory regions, when those standby 
regions are detected at ipl time.
  The reason for this is, that setting standby online memory is supposed to 
succeed especially in memory constrained environments, since lack of free 
memory is likely the reason why additional memory is brought online.
  If in such cases 'struct pages' would have to be allocated before memory 
could be brought up, this would likely fail, and contradict the whole rationale 
of memory hotplug.

  However pre-allocating memory for 'struct pages' comes with the
  downside that for highly unbalanced ratios of online/standby memory a
  system might even fail to ipl, because there is not enough memory
  available for all possible struct pages which are required for standby
  memory.

  The idea is to improve the situation: when standby memory is brought
  online, the memory for struct pages (and maybe other management
  structures) required for this new memory area should be taken from the
  online memory, instead of pre-allocating them.

  This would solve the problems with unbalanced ratios as described
  above.

  Note: there are intentions to tell customers that they should always
  define the maximum size of standby memory for their LPAR activation
  profiles. This would allow for maximum flexibility for all LPARs
  during runtime, given that the amount of standby memory cannot be
  changed during runtime.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/2051835/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2051835] Re: [24.04 FEAT] Memory hotplug vmem pages (s390x)

2024-03-19 Thread Frank Heimes
Patches that are needed for noble/24.04 submitted to the kernel teams mailing 
list:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2024-March/149667.html
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2024-March/thread.html#149667

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
   Status: New => In Progress

** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Noble)
   Importance: High
   Status: In Progress

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Noble)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Canonical Kernel Team (canonical-kernel-team)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051835

Title:
  [24.04 FEAT] Memory hotplug vmem pages (s390x)

Status in Ubuntu on IBM z Systems:
  In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Noble:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  The current s390 specific memory hotplug backend allocates 'struct page' 
management structures for all standby memory regions, when those standby 
regions are detected at ipl time.
  The reason for this is, that setting standby online memory is supposed to 
succeed especially in memory constrained environments, since lack of free 
memory is likely the reason why additional memory is brought online.
  If in such cases 'struct pages' would have to be allocated before memory 
could be brought up, this would likely fail, and contradict the whole rationale 
of memory hotplug.

  However pre-allocating memory for 'struct pages' comes with the
  downside that for highly unbalanced ratios of online/standby memory a
  system might even fail to ipl, because there is not enough memory
  available for all possible struct pages which are required for standby
  memory.

  The idea is to improve the situation: when standby memory is brought
  online, the memory for struct pages (and maybe other management
  structures) required for this new memory area should be taken from the
  online memory, instead of pre-allocating them.

  This would solve the problems with unbalanced ratios as described
  above.

  Note: there are intentions to tell customers that they should always
  define the maximum size of standby memory for their LPAR activation
  profiles. This would allow for maximum flexibility for all LPARs
  during runtime, given that the amount of standby memory cannot be
  changed during runtime.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/2051835/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2051835] Re: [24.04 FEAT] Memory hotplug vmem pages (s390x)

2024-03-19 Thread Frank Heimes
** Summary changed:

- [24.04 FEAT] Memory hotplug vmem pages
+ [24.04 FEAT] Memory hotplug vmem pages (s390x)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051835

Title:
  [24.04 FEAT] Memory hotplug vmem pages (s390x)

Status in Ubuntu on IBM z Systems:
  New
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  The current s390 specific memory hotplug backend allocates 'struct page' 
management structures for all standby memory regions, when those standby 
regions are detected at ipl time.
  The reason for this is, that setting standby online memory is supposed to 
succeed especially in memory constrained environments, since lack of free 
memory is likely the reason why additional memory is brought online.
  If in such cases 'struct pages' would have to be allocated before memory 
could be brought up, this would likely fail, and contradict the whole rationale 
of memory hotplug.

  However pre-allocating memory for 'struct pages' comes with the
  downside that for highly unbalanced ratios of online/standby memory a
  system might even fail to ipl, because there is not enough memory
  available for all possible struct pages which are required for standby
  memory.

  The idea is to improve the situation: when standby memory is brought
  online, the memory for struct pages (and maybe other management
  structures) required for this new memory area should be taken from the
  online memory, instead of pre-allocating them.

  This would solve the problems with unbalanced ratios as described
  above.

  Note: there are intentions to tell customers that they should always
  define the maximum size of standby memory for their LPAR activation
  profiles. This would allow for maximum flexibility for all LPARs
  during runtime, given that the amount of standby memory cannot be
  changed during runtime.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/2051835/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp