Re: New server deployment
On Sat, Dec 16, at 01:30 Gerard Beekmans wrote: This is kind of annoying because my filter is set on the To: lfs-book. I don't know the Trac settings at all, so I'm no help there. Must be a byproduct of the new version of Trac. Until tht's figured out, I suggest using a different filter rather than the To: header. A list won't always appear in the To: header or emails may have been directed to more than one list using CC and/or BCC as well. A better header to filter on is the List-ID header that every list email has (this list would be List-ID: .*lfs-dev.linuxfromscratch.org) Note the @ is replaced with a . in the List-ID header. Strange. The List-Id header is missing in some (not all) of the emails. For example today's ticket #2206. Still there are 3 other headers that can be used for filtering,although the List-Id is preferable. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: New server deployment
On Thu, Dec 21, at 12:12 Ag. Hatzimanikas wrote: On Sat, Dec 16, at 01:30 Gerard Beekmans wrote: This is kind of annoying because my filter is set on the To: lfs-book. I don't know the Trac settings at all, so I'm no help there. Must be a byproduct of the new version of Trac. Until tht's figured out, I suggest using a different filter rather than the To: header. A list won't always appear in the To: header or emails may have been directed to more than one list using CC and/or BCC as well. A better header to filter on is the List-ID header that every list email has (this list would be List-ID: .*lfs-dev.linuxfromscratch.org) Note the @ is replaced with a . in the List-ID header. Strange. The List-Id header is missing in some (not all) of the emails. For example today's ticket #2206. That is a Blfs ticket. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: New server deployment
On 12/21/06, Ag. Hatzimanikas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Dec 21, at 12:12 Ag. Hatzimanikas wrote: On Sat, Dec 16, at 01:30 Gerard Beekmans wrote: This is kind of annoying because my filter is set on the To: lfs-book. I don't know the Trac settings at all, so I'm no help there. Must be a byproduct of the new version of Trac. Until tht's figured out, I suggest using a different filter rather than the To: header. A list won't always appear in the To: header or emails may have been directed to more than one list using CC and/or BCC as well. A better header to filter on is the List-ID header that every list email has (this list would be List-ID: .*lfs-dev.linuxfromscratch.org) Note the @ is replaced with a . in the List-ID header. Strange. The List-Id header is missing in some (not all) of the emails. For example today's ticket #2206. That is a Blfs ticket. Here's the other strange thing. Yesterday I checked the queue of junk mail for in Mailman for blfs-book, and there was another copy of each of the BLFS ticket emails. Bruce or Gerard, I left them in the queue. Could you have a look? Something's not right about Trac's email. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: New server deployment
Dan Nicholson wrote: On 12/21/06, Ag. Hatzimanikas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Dec 21, at 12:12 Ag. Hatzimanikas wrote: On Sat, Dec 16, at 01:30 Gerard Beekmans wrote: This is kind of annoying because my filter is set on the To: lfs-book. I don't know the Trac settings at all, so I'm no help there. Must be a byproduct of the new version of Trac. Until tht's figured out, I suggest using a different filter rather than the To: header. A list won't always appear in the To: header or emails may have been directed to more than one list using CC and/or BCC as well. A better header to filter on is the List-ID header that every list email has (this list would be List-ID: .*lfs-dev.linuxfromscratch.org) Note the @ is replaced with a . in the List-ID header. Strange. The List-Id header is missing in some (not all) of the emails. For example today's ticket #2206. That is a Blfs ticket. Here's the other strange thing. Yesterday I checked the queue of junk mail for in Mailman for blfs-book, and there was another copy of each of the BLFS ticket emails. Bruce or Gerard, I left them in the queue. Could you have a look? Something's not right about Trac's email. Gerard's been doing the mail. I would be starting from the beginning. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: New server deployment
Alrighty, I'll take a look at this and see what the heck is going on. I just realized this may very well be a Mailman issue as well. New version of Mailman is installed on this new server. It probably has introduced a few bugs the old version didn't have. I'll look into this. Gerard -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: New server deployment
Most service are back running now. The mailinglists just came back online and appear to be in proper working condition. There will be some issue with spam coming through that will be dealt with as it's noticed. The filters and score values will need to be tweaked. If you notice anything amiss please email us at server-admin -- Gerard Beekmans /* If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have the wrong problem */ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: New server deployment
Gerard Beekmans wrote: Most service are back running now. The mailinglists just came back online and appear to be in proper working condition. There will be some issue with spam coming through that will be dealt with as it's noticed. The filters and score values will need to be tweaked. If you notice anything amiss please email us at server-admin Gerard, I just repointed the DNS server at easydns to the new IP at LFS.org. Should populate in a few hours. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: New server deployment
On 12/16/06, Gerard Beekmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you notice anything amiss please email us at server-admin This is minor but annoying. Trac is sending out mail to the lfs-book list as it should, but it's setting To: undisclosed recipients. Here's a bit from one that just came out. Subject: Re: [LFS Trac] #1935: gcc-4.1.1 upstream bugfixes X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/1935#comment:2 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 1935 In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: undisclosed-recipients:; X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:15:27 -0700 X-BeenThere: lfs-book@linuxfromscratch.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 This is kind of annoying because my filter is set on the To: lfs-book. I don't know the Trac settings at all, so I'm no help there. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: New server deployment
This is kind of annoying because my filter is set on the To: lfs-book. I don't know the Trac settings at all, so I'm no help there. Must be a byproduct of the new version of Trac. Until tht's figured out, I suggest using a different filter rather than the To: header. A list won't always appear in the To: header or emails may have been directed to more than one list using CC and/or BCC as well. A better header to filter on is the List-ID header that every list email has (this list would be List-ID: .*lfs-dev.linuxfromscratch.org) Note the @ is replaced with a . in the List-ID header. -- Gerard Beekmans /* If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have the wrong problem */ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: New server deployment
Hi guys, Things are going to move real quick now and I'm not able to give 24 hours notice anymore. Sorry to hear you're ill, Gerard. I can be contacted on [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] if needs be. Best wishes, and good luck with the server deployment. Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: New server deployment
Hi guys, Things are going to move real quick now and I'm not able to give 24 hours notice anymore. Sorry to hear you're ill, Gerard. I can be contacted on Oh crap. That reply should have gone straight to Gerard, not to the list. Now I'm gonna get bombarded with spam unless anyone can think of a way of undoing the sending of an email? (could we somehow fool mailman into thinking it never got sent and let it regenerate the archives, thereby avoiding the webcrawlers)? Thanks, and sorry for hijacking the thread! Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: New server deployment
Oh crap. That reply should have gone straight to Gerard, not to the list. Now I'm gonna get bombarded with spam unless anyone can think of a way of undoing the sending of an email? (could we somehow fool mailman into thinking it never got sent and let it regenerate the archives, thereby avoiding the webcrawlers)? There's only one way I know of and that's edit the mbox file that Mailman has and re-gen the entire archive for that list. Something we can play with in a day or two or three when the new server (Quantum) is fully operational. It's 1 PM MST now, I've packed up the server in the car and am about to head out. -- Gerard Beekmans /* If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have the wrong problem */ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
