Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW][3-5] Fix pivot table's date and number grouping

2012-01-24 Thread Markus Mohrhard
Hello Kohei,

2012/1/24 Kohei Yoshida kohei.yosh...@gmail.com:
 Hi there,

 I would like

 http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=2c659e692a17cc10d364a2304bead9403fc6bdde

 to be backported to the 3-5 branch.  It fixes

 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45067

 Review and sign-off appreciated.


 Did you check with libreoffice 3-5? I think that eike's work for date
patterns is missing in 3-5 so that this patch does reopen the bug we
discussed on IRC. At least your unit test fails and I think we should
check that before adding the patch to 3-5.

Regards,
Markus
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW][3-5] Fix pivot table's date and number grouping

2012-01-24 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi,

On Tuesday, 2012-01-24 11:42:57 +0100, Markus Mohrhard wrote:

  Did you check with libreoffice 3-5? I think that eike's work for date
 patterns is missing in 3-5

Yes, that's only on master.

 so that this patch does reopen the bug we
 discussed on IRC. At least your unit test fails and I think we should
 check that before adding the patch to 3-5.

Relying on date patterns sounds very fragile, they vary between locales
and may change at any time.

  Eike

-- 
LibreOffice Calc developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer.
GnuPG key 0x293C05FD : 997A 4C60 CE41 0149 0DB3  9E96 2F1A D073 293C 05FD


pgp80WFH7OTZ0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW][3-5] Fix pivot table's date and number grouping

2012-01-24 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 12:24 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
 Hi,
 
 On Tuesday, 2012-01-24 11:42:57 +0100, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
 
   Did you check with libreoffice 3-5? I think that eike's work for date
  patterns is missing in 3-5
 
 Yes, that's only on master.
 
  so that this patch does reopen the bug we
  discussed on IRC. At least your unit test fails and I think we should
  check that before adding the patch to 3-5.
 
 Relying on date patterns sounds very fragile, they vary between locales
 and may change at any time.

Sure, but that's how it used to work.  It's fragile, yes, but to fix it
properly we'd have to make more invasive changes, and definitely not for
3.5.

-- 
Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc

___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice