[Bug 160088] Conditional formatting not working with dates <1900

2024-04-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160088

ady  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160088] Conditional formatting not working with dates <1900

2024-04-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160088

Bill Maier  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||libre.book...@passinbox.com

--- Comment #3 from Bill Maier  ---
I agree with the comments by Werner Tietz and Rafael Lima.

I think a question that must be asked is this: should the program allow users
to treat dates as raw numeric values? If so then everything is working fine. If
not, then when the user enters the condition "[date] > 0" an error should be
flagged. For consistency I think dates should not be treated as numbers, but I
can see this being defined either way.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160088] Conditional formatting not working with dates <1900

2024-03-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160088

--- Comment #2 from Rafael Lima  ---
I'd say this is NAB.

If the point of using "> 0" is to simply determine whether the cell is empty or
not, you could simply use the "is not equal to" rule of the conditional
formatting and then add "" as the value.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160088] Conditional formatting not working with dates <1900

2024-03-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160088

--- Comment #1 from Werner Tietz  ---
Any Date before Calc-»Epoch« (1899-12-30) is a negative floatingpoint-number in
units of days before 1899-12-30

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.