Re: Line break ruin's tie
Andrew Bernardwrote: > > Only very quickly sketched, and rather deficient, but a more 'normal' voice > arrangement system, and the tie to the f sharp is clear. When I compiled your snippet, the exact same issue was present: the tie to the F-sharp is not clear at all. It _still_ looks like a slur to the D. I attach a png of what your snippet looks like. Yes, I am away of the: \new Voice = "first" {} \new Voice = "second" {} construct, in the context of my entire composition I feel my way is clearer, and your coding the voices differently did not change the problem of the tie looking like a slur. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Line break ruin's tie
Andrew Bernardwrote: > > Why don't you just create the three voices and notate inside > each one continuously? Because this music constantly goes back and forth between homophonic chords and contrapuntal voices. This is one of the few places in the 150_ measures that the music goes to three voices though. > keeping it simple like this makes work a whole lot > easier I find. In the context of the entire composition, this snippet is not overly complex. And we still do not have an answer to my issue. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Line break ruin's tie
Hi Ivan Only very quickly sketched, and rather deficient, but a more 'normal' voice arrangement system, and the tie to the f sharp is clear. You can adjust this a thousand ways, and you could turn off the accidental at the new line too if you want [with \override Accidental.hide-tied-accidental-after-break = ##t]. I leave it as an exercise for you to play with the note alignments. It depends on whether you are notating this as proper polyphony or in a more free style, with the three notes of the chord lines up vertically - up to you. SOoory I don't have time today to produce something nicer for you, but you get the picture. Andrew \version "2.19.80" \language "english" \score { \new Staff = "guitar" { \clef "treble_8" \time 2/4 << \new Voice = "first" { \voiceOne b4\rest cs'4~ \break cs'2 } \new Voice = "second" { \voiceTwo s4 cs'8 fs8 _~ fs2 } \new Voice = "third" { \voiceFour s2 d2 } >> } } ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Line break ruin's tie
Hi Ivan, You have a set of voices for one bar, and then another set for the next bar. Somewhat strange. Why don't you just create the three voices and notate inside each one continuously? keeping it simple like this makes work a whole lot easier I find. Andrew ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Line break ruin's tie
The two measure snippet of code appended below creates the notation that I want. The Fsharp of measure 1 is very clearly tied to the Fsharp of measure 2. However, when I use these two measures in my actual score, lilypond happens to puts a line break between those two measures, and the notation is ruined. The tie between the two Fsharps now _looks_ like a slur from Fsharp to D and the second Fsharp _looks_ as though it is to be struck again at the beginning of measure 2. Has anyone ideas on how to correct this, that is, get the Fsharp tie to look like a tie between the two Fsharps, even over a line break? Thank you very much for your help. \version "2.19.80" \language "english" \score { \new Staff = "guitar" { \clef "treble_8" \time 2/4 r4 << { \voiceOne cs'4~ } \context Voice = "vtwo" { \voiceTwo cs'8 fs8~ } >> % \break %% << TRY PUTTING A BREAK HERE | << { \voiceOne cs'2 } \context Voice = "vtwo" { \voiceTwo \stemUp fs2 } \context Voice = "vthree" { \voiceThree \stemDown \tieDown d2 } >> \oneVoice | } } ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user