Re: Line break ruins tie

2018-01-04 Thread Ivan Kuznetsov 
On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 11:30 PM, David Wright  wrote:
>
> So it seems you have several choices:
> remove the accidental,
> shrink it,
> allow the tie and accidental to collide,
> invert the tie (^~),
> shorten it,
> forbid a linebreak just there.


 \override Accidental.hide-tied-accidental-after-break = ##t
does indeed provide a solution (something Andrew also mentioned earlier).

I will go with that for now.  Thanks to both of you.

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Line break ruins tie

2018-01-04 Thread David Wright 
On Thu 04 Jan 2018 at 22:57:03 (-0600), Ivan Kuznetsov wrote:
> Andrew Bernard  wrote:
> >
> > Only very quickly sketched, and rather deficient, but a more 'normal' voice
> > arrangement system, and the tie to the f sharp is clear.
> 
> When I compiled your snippet, the exact same issue was present:
> the tie to the F-sharp is not clear at all. It _still_
> looks like a slur to the D.  I attach a png
> of what your snippet looks like.
> 
> 
> Yes, I am away of the:
> 
> \new Voice = "first" {}
> \new Voice = "second" {}
> 
> construct, in the context of my entire composition I feel
> my way is clearer, and your coding the voices differently
> did not change the problem of the tie looking like a slur.

The D has nothing much to do with it. (If you delete it,
nothing moves.)

So it seems you have several choices:
remove the accidental,
shrink it,
allow the tie and accidental to collide,
invert the tie (^~),
shorten it,
forbid a linebreak just there.

Cheers,
David.

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user