Re: linux-next: manual merge of the irqchip tree with the sunxi tree
Hi,
On Thu 18 Feb 21, 15:48, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 09:11:24 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 14:42:59 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the irqchip tree got a conflict in:
> > >
> > >
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi.yaml
> > >
> > > between commit:
> > >
> > > 752b0aac99c7 ("dt-bindings: irq: sun7i-nmi: Add binding documentation
> > > for the V3s NMI")
> > >
> > > from the sunxi tree and commit:
> > >
> > > ad6b47cdef76 ("dt-bindings: irq: sun6i-r: Split the binding from
> > > sun7i-nmi")
> > >
> > > from the irqchip tree.
> > >
> > > I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as
> > > necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> > > non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> > > when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
> > > cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> > > particularly complex conflicts.
> > >
> > > diff --cc
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi.yaml
> > > index 4fd1e2780026,f34ecc8c7093..
> > > ---
> > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi.yaml
> > > +++
> > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi.yaml
> > > @@@ -25,17 -25,7 +25,10 @@@ properties
> > > - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-sc-nmi
> > > deprecated: true
> > > - const: allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi
> > > - - items:
> > > - - const: allwinner,sun8i-a83t-r-intc
> > > - - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-r-intc
> > > + - items:
> > > + - const: allwinner,sun8i-v3s-nmi
> > > + - const: allwinner,sun9i-a80-nmi
> > > - const: allwinner,sun9i-a80-nmi
> > > - - items:
> > > - - const: allwinner,sun50i-a64-r-intc
> > > - - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-r-intc
> > > - items:
> > > - const: allwinner,sun50i-a100-nmi
> > > - const: allwinner,sun9i-a80-nmi
> >
> > With the merge window about to open, this is a reminder that this
> > conflict still exists. It is now between the arm-soc tree and the
> > irqchip tree.
>
> This is now a conflict between the arm-soc tree and the tip tree.
The resolution looks correct to me!
Cheers,
Paul
--
Developer of free digital technology and hardware support.
Website: https://www.paulk.fr/
Coding blog: https://code.paulk.fr/
Git repositories: https://git.paulk.fr/ https://git.code.paulk.fr/
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the irqchip tree with the sunxi tree
Hi all,
On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 09:11:24 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 14:42:59 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the irqchip tree got a conflict in:
> >
> >
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi.yaml
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > 752b0aac99c7 ("dt-bindings: irq: sun7i-nmi: Add binding documentation for
> > the V3s NMI")
> >
> > from the sunxi tree and commit:
> >
> > ad6b47cdef76 ("dt-bindings: irq: sun6i-r: Split the binding from
> > sun7i-nmi")
> >
> > from the irqchip tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as
> > necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> > non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> > when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
> > cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> > particularly complex conflicts.
> >
> > diff --cc
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi.yaml
> > index 4fd1e2780026,f34ecc8c7093..
> > ---
> > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi.yaml
> > +++
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi.yaml
> > @@@ -25,17 -25,7 +25,10 @@@ properties
> > - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-sc-nmi
> > deprecated: true
> > - const: allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi
> > - - items:
> > - - const: allwinner,sun8i-a83t-r-intc
> > - - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-r-intc
> > + - items:
> > + - const: allwinner,sun8i-v3s-nmi
> > + - const: allwinner,sun9i-a80-nmi
> > - const: allwinner,sun9i-a80-nmi
> > - - items:
> > - - const: allwinner,sun50i-a64-r-intc
> > - - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-r-intc
> > - items:
> > - const: allwinner,sun50i-a100-nmi
> > - const: allwinner,sun9i-a80-nmi
>
> With the merge window about to open, this is a reminder that this
> conflict still exists. It is now between the arm-soc tree and the
> irqchip tree.
This is now a conflict between the arm-soc tree and the tip tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
pgpCHSSr1yVF7.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the irqchip tree with the sunxi tree
Hi all,
On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 14:42:59 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the irqchip tree got a conflict in:
>
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi.yaml
>
> between commit:
>
> 752b0aac99c7 ("dt-bindings: irq: sun7i-nmi: Add binding documentation for
> the V3s NMI")
>
> from the sunxi tree and commit:
>
> ad6b47cdef76 ("dt-bindings: irq: sun6i-r: Split the binding from sun7i-nmi")
>
> from the irqchip tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.
>
> diff --cc
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi.yaml
> index 4fd1e2780026,f34ecc8c7093..
> ---
> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi.yaml
> +++
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi.yaml
> @@@ -25,17 -25,7 +25,10 @@@ properties
> - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-sc-nmi
> deprecated: true
> - const: allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi
> - - items:
> - - const: allwinner,sun8i-a83t-r-intc
> - - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-r-intc
> + - items:
> + - const: allwinner,sun8i-v3s-nmi
> + - const: allwinner,sun9i-a80-nmi
> - const: allwinner,sun9i-a80-nmi
> - - items:
> - - const: allwinner,sun50i-a64-r-intc
> - - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-r-intc
> - items:
> - const: allwinner,sun50i-a100-nmi
> - const: allwinner,sun9i-a80-nmi
With the merge window about to open, this is a reminder that this
conflict still exists. It is now between the arm-soc tree and the
irqchip tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
pgpfY1zj8PC_q.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
