am 10.08.2009 14:46 schrieb Sumurai8 (DD):
Peter Velan wrote:
In modern/main.css the related styles defined like ...
#mw_content a[...]
... in all *other* supplied skins (including monobook) the definitions
look line ...
#bodyContent a[...]
I duplicated every #mw_content a[...]-definition (needed for modern)
in Common.css as #bodyContent a[...] (needed for all other skins)
and finally it works :-)
Could somebody explain, why there's different style definitions
(#mw_content vs #bodyContent)?
First there was nothing...
...and then MediaWiki showed up. ;-) I can't find the link where I read
first about all the skins, but possibly it is somewhere on MediaWiki.org
actually; Monobook was created far before modern was. 'myskin', 'monobook'
and some more skins looks pretty the same, but modern was created in 1.12
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:$wgDefaultSkin and uses other id's;
therefore, modern uses it's own common, print and such .css'es.
See also en-wikipedia's: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Gadgets and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Gadget-modernskin-thunks.js
Thank you. Will take a deeper look to above stuff.
Peter
___
MediaWiki-l mailing list
MediaWiki-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
