Re: Suppressing email address in existing archive...

2000-05-10 Thread John Beranek

On Tue 09 May, Nathaniel Irons wrote:
 On 5/9/2000 at 9:59 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Beranek) wrote:
 
  However, this doesn't work for old messages...
 
 Run mhonarc on your old archives with -editidx, and your current
 resource file.

That doesn't work for mail headers. (or didn't appear to)

   -nat

John.

-- 
John Beranek, Senior Software Engineer
Pace Micro Technology plc. (Cambridge)Tel: +44 1223 518561
645 Newmarket Road,   Fax: +44 1223 518526
Cambridge, CB5 8PB, UK.   Web: http://www.pace.co.uk/




Re: Suppressing email address in existing archive...

2000-05-09 Thread John Beranek

On Tue 09 May, John Beranek wrote:
 
   Additionally, how would I do this for new messages...I'm using a
 procmail filter to process my mail...I guess it's done through procmail
 some how.

Ahem, answered part of my own message...I put SPAMMODE in my resource
file, and new messages don't contain the address.

However, this doesn't work for old messages...

John.

-- 
John Beranek, Senior Software Engineer
Pace Micro Technology plc. (Cambridge)Tel: +44 1223 518561
645 Newmarket Road,   Fax: +44 1223 518526
Cambridge, CB5 8PB, UK.   Web: http://www.pace.co.uk/




Re: Suppressing email address in existing archive...

2000-05-09 Thread Dave Sill

John Beranek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Ahem, answered part of my own message...I put SPAMMODE in my resource
file, and new messages don't contain the address.

However, this doesn't work for old messages...

Here's a little script I wrote when I was in the same situation. It's
more aggressive than spammode, though, because it cloaks all addresses 
in the file.

  #!/usr/local/bin/perl -pi~
  s|([\!\%\w\.\-+=/]+@)([\w\.\-]+)|$1.('x' x length($2))|ge

The substitute command came from MHonArc. It replaces the domain with
an equal-length string of x's.

-Dave




Re: Suppressing email address in existing archive...

2000-05-09 Thread Nathaniel Irons

On 5/9/2000 at 9:59 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Beranek) wrote:

 However, this doesn't work for old messages...

Run mhonarc on your old archives with -editidx, and your current
resource file.

  -nat




Re: Suppressing email address in existing archive...

2000-05-09 Thread J C Lawrence

On Tue, 9 May 2000 09:44:40 +0100 (BST) 
John Beranek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   I've got an existing archive of a mailing list, and people on
 the mailing list have just started mumbling about privacy and spam
 protection...so, is it possible to remove everything after the @
 in "from" addresses in the existing archive?

I restroactively munge the HTML that MHonArc produces to corrupt
email addresses. via a simple sed script.  See 

  ftp://ftp.kanga.nu/pub/Kanga.Nu/MHonArc/emailmunge

Note that there is a known problem with this script.  MHonArc
fequently (not always) appears to re-write the last N message files
on each run (I presume based on the thread linkages).  This results
in some messages being re-written and then not re-munged due to the
filename cacheing done via ./.emunge.db.  One of my list members has
hacked the script to work around this (there's a bug report with a
copy of the hacked script under http://www.kanga.nu/tasks/) but I
haven't checked or tested the details of what he did.

-- 
J C Lawrence Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--(*)  Other: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--=| A man is as sane as he is dangerous to his environment |=--




Re: Suppressing email address in existing archive...

2000-05-09 Thread J C Lawrence

On Tue, 9 May 2000 07:50:23 -0400 (EDT) 
Dave Sill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 John Beranek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Here's a little script I wrote when I was in the same
 situation. It's more aggressive than spammode, though, because it
 cloaks all addresses in the file.

   #!/usr/local/bin/perl -pi~
   s|([\!\%\w\.\-+=/]+@)([\w\.\-]+)|$1.('x' x length($2))|ge

 The substitute command came from MHonArc. It replaces the domain
 with an equal-length string of x's.

It shares another problem with my scipt in that it will munge
MessageIDs as well.  This can cause (as I've found) minor threading
and use problems (MessageIDs are the one true index key and you
edited them).

-- 
J C Lawrence Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--(*)  Other: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--=| A man is as sane as he is dangerous to his environment |=--