Re: Good Lense for Portraits? [v04.n200/30]

1999-01-20 Thread James W. Norris


Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 13:44:42 -0500
From: MIKE MOORE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Good Lense for Portraits? [v04.n200/30]
Message: 30

I'm considering buying a 105mm 2.8 D
AF Micro-Nikkor for portraits. I'll
be coupling it to a N70. Good
choice? I shoot mostly BW if it
matters. Also anyone know if there
is an abundance of these lenses in
good shape used?

Thanks,
Mike Moore
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

It is great for portraits.  However, at normal distances it isn't
sharper than the AIS 105 f2.5.

Sorry, don't believe there are many of these lenses available on the
used market.  You could try Del's for example.

Jim



Re: Good Lense for Portraits? [v04.n200/30]

1999-01-20 Thread giancarlo cristinziano

I'm considering buying a 105mm 2.8 D
AF Micro-Nikkor for portraits. I'll
be coupling it to a N70. Good
choice? I shoot mostly BW if it
matters. Also anyone know if there
is an abundance of these lenses in
good shape used?

Thanks,
Mike Moore
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Two years ago I made a comparison with my 85/1.8 and the 105/2.8 micro
I suggest to buy the 105 micro only if you are interested in its macro
capabilities
or you need a longer focal lenght than the 85.
The optical performance of both (only one sample tried) are basically equal
with
an almost imperceptible edge of the 85 wide open (2.8) (I rarely use
the 85 at 1.8 because it is too soft IMHO).
The 85 is a compact lens, allows for a brilliant image in the viewfinder,
costs less and you can find plenty of them used.
The 105 micro is a very good versatile lens but I found that its biggest
drawback is
the AF speed (very slow especially if you use it along the whole focus
range), it costs more and it's not simple to find it used.
hope this helps



Massimiliano Marchetti

web page: http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/Gallery/8043