[OPSAWG] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh-11

[Joel Halpern via Datatracker]

Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review result: Ready with Issues

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

.

Document: draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh-11
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review Date: 2024-05-02
IETF LC End Date: 2024-05-10
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC

Major issues: None

Minor issues:
The document uses the phrasing "If several extension header chains are
observed in a Flow" in several places.  While I believe I figured out what
was intended, it caused me difficulty.  Assuming I understood the intent, I
would suggest defining a term "flow with varying header chain" as "a flow
wherein different packets in the flow have a different sequence of
extension header types codes."  And then use that term in the suitable
places in the document.

Nits/editorial comments: None


___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Re: [OPSAWG]  IPR Call for draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-question-mark-03

[Adrian Farrel]

Hello Henk,

No I'm not aware of any IPR the pertains to the content of this draft.

Adrian

-Original Message-
From: OPSAWG  On Behalf Of Henk Birkholz
Sent: 02 May 2024 16:49
To: opsawg ; 
draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-question-m...@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG]  IPR Call for 
draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-question-mark-03

Dear authors and contributors,

as a part of the adoption process, the chairs would also like to issue a 
first IPR call on the content of adoption candidates (there will also be 
a second IPR call after successful WGLC).

Please respond on-list as to whether or not you are aware of any IPR 
that pertains to draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-question-mark-03.

If you are aware of IPR, please also indicate whether or not this has 
been disclosed per IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3669, 5378, and 8179).


For the OPSAWG co-chairs,

Henk

p.s. today is a good day to respond to the 
draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-question-mark-03 WG adoption call, if 
you have not done so yet

___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Re: [OPSAWG]  WG Adoption Call for draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-question-mark-03

[Adrian Farrel]

That sounds like a good point, Dhruv.

 

Cheers,

Adrian

 

From: OPSAWG  On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
Sent: 01 May 2024 11:52
To: Henk Birkholz 
Cc: OPSAWG 
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG]  WG Adoption Call for 
draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-question-mark-03

 

Hi,

I support adoption. 

Just one comment - 

In-Packet OAM:
The OAM messages are carried as part of data traffic. This was sometimes 
referred to as "in-band".

 

I wonder if "message" is the correct term here. In the example that follow for 
IOAM you use the term "information". 

 

Thanks!
Dhruv

On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 4:36 PM Henk Birkholz mailto:henk.birkholz@ietf.contact> > wrote:

Dear OPSAWG members,

this email starts a call for Working Group Adoption of

> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-question-mark-03.html

ending on Thursday, May 2nd.

As a reminder, this I-D summarizes how the term "Operations, 
Administration, and Maintenance" (OAM) is used currently & historically 
in the IETF and intends to consolidate unambiguous and protocol agnostic 
terminology for OAM. The summary includes descriptions of narrower 
semantics introduced by added qualifications the term OAM and a list of 
common capabilities that can be found in nodes processing OAM packets.

The chairs acknowledge a positive poll result at IETF119, but there has 
not been much discussion on the list yet. We would like to gather 
feedback from the WG if there is interest to further contribute and 
review. As a potential enabler for discussions, this call will last 
three weeks.

Please reply with your support and especially any substantive comments 
you may have.


For the OPSAWG co-chairs,

Henk

___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org  
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Re: [OPSAWG]  IPR Call for draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-question-mark-03

[Carlos Pignataro]

Henk,

Thanks! I am not aware of any IPR that pertains to 
draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-question-mark-03.

Best,

Carlos.

> On May 2, 2024, at 11:48 AM, Henk Birkholz  wrote:
> 
> Dear authors and contributors,
> 
> as a part of the adoption process, the chairs would also like to issue a 
> first IPR call on the content of adoption candidates (there will also be a 
> second IPR call after successful WGLC).
> 
> Please respond on-list as to whether or not you are aware of any IPR that 
> pertains to draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-question-mark-03.
> 
> If you are aware of IPR, please also indicate whether or not this has been 
> disclosed per IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3669, 5378, and 8179).
> 
> 
> For the OPSAWG co-chairs,
> 
> Henk
> 
> p.s. today is a good day to respond to the 
> draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-question-mark-03 WG adoption call, if you 
> have not done so yet



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

[OPSAWG]  IPR Call for draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-question-mark-03

[Henk Birkholz]

Dear authors and contributors,

as a part of the adoption process, the chairs would also like to issue a 
first IPR call on the content of adoption candidates (there will also be 
a second IPR call after successful WGLC).


Please respond on-list as to whether or not you are aware of any IPR 
that pertains to draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-question-mark-03.


If you are aware of IPR, please also indicate whether or not this has 
been disclosed per IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3669, 5378, and 8179).



For the OPSAWG co-chairs,

Henk

p.s. today is a good day to respond to the 
draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-question-mark-03 WG adoption call, if 
you have not done so yet


___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg