Re: [gluster-packaging] [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-3.12.14 released

[Niels de Vos]

On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:28:16AM -0400, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
> On 09/13/2018 10:10 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> > Anyone that can provide me with an ansible playbook, or even scripts
> > that need to run on server and client systems is strongly encouraged to
> > share them. We can then include them in the CentOS CI where client and
> > server systems can get reserved with different CentOS releases.
> > 
> > At the moment I do not have any automation to easily run tests locally.
> > I will rather invest time in setting up jobs in a real CI.
> 
> This [1] is what I do, and have been posting the link (almost) every
> time I test this. This does use docker and containers, because that
> gives me a clean environment quickly, but steps would remain the same.
> 
> Does this help?

Yes, it helps and I've seen these steps several times before too :)
The general steps can be used for setting up an environment, but ideally
the tests do not run in manually created containers as that is
(hopefully!) not what users do either. Testing the RPMs should be done
on systems that mimic real world deployments as close as possible.

The main thing that I would like to see included in the test is a script
that takes care of

*** run some creates and tests as needed!

We do have a few automated container builds as well. Users that need
containers are expected to use those. I do not think we have any
automated (or manual) testing in place for these though :-/


> [1] Package testing: https://hackmd.io/-yC3Ol68SwaRWr8bzaL8pw#
___
packaging mailing list
packaging@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging

Re: [gluster-packaging] [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-3.12.14 released

[Niels de Vos]

On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 09:43:41AM -0400, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
> On 09/11/2018 04:44 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 08:39:50PM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 05:07:21PM +, jenk...@build.gluster.org wrote:
> >>> SRC: 
> >>> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/68/artifact/glusterfs-3.12.14.tar.gz
> >>> HASH: 
> >>> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/68/artifact/glusterfs-3.12.14.sha512sum
> >>
> >> These packages have been built in the CentOS Storage SIG. Please enable
> >> the testing repository and try them out (might take a few hours for the
> >> packages to become available).
> >>
> >> Once done testing, let me know and I'll mark them as stable. There are
> >> normally no pushes to the CentOS mirrors done on Friday, so Monday is
> >> the earliest next slot.
> > 
> > There has been no confirmation that these packages work as expected.
> > Could someone try them out and update the lists?
> 
> @Jiffin are you taking care of this? (same for 4.1.4)

Jiffin mentioned yesterday (over the phone) that he tested the latest
versions (3.12.14 and 4.1.4). He would also send and email with a
confirmation. I've tagged the packages yesterday, so they might have
been signed+pushed today (depending on the CentOS team).

> @Niels, can we make this part the CentOS package manager responsibility?
> As it is mostly me who does this testing, just waiting for the build and
> then using the bits, it would be more efficient if done at the source
> IMO. Thoughts?

I actually would love to have this automated, and that should be good
possible. Even once I've done the builds for CentOS-6 and 7, the
packages are not immediately available in the testing repository. It
really does not matter who checks when the packages can be installad and
runs some tests.

Anyone that can provide me with an ansible playbook, or even scripts
that need to run on server and client systems is strongly encouraged to
share them. We can then include them in the CentOS CI where client and
server systems can get reserved with different CentOS releases.

At the moment I do not have any automation to easily run tests locally.
I will rather invest time in setting up jobs in a real CI.

Niels
___
packaging mailing list
packaging@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging