I have a way of performance logging anything with php. Let me know what
type of performance data you would like to see and I will do my best to get
the data ready rather quickly. I will gather the data that I have collect
over the past few months. It is a performance log of every part of php that
my site uses. I will try an get that data together by the first of next
week.
it will show microsecond time lines of include(), requires(), print()
echo, ?=?, and other related functions.
Lets me know what you would like to see.
Jim Lucas
- Original Message -
From: Jack Dempsey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jon Niola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 11:50 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP] echo vs. print() performance?
not as a criticism, but this is among the top 10 questions asked ...or
used
to be for a while...anyway, there's tons of info on the mailing lists,
marc.theaimsgroup.com
the short answer is that echo is SLIGHTLY faster being a language
construct
rather than a function...then again, i believe i remember someone proving
the
opposite...in general, you'll never notice a differenece between the
two...
Jon Niola wrote:
Someone on this list once mentioned a performance difference between
using
echo and print(). Is there any evidence to back this up? I am really
curious to see if it would make a difference to use one over the other.
--Jon
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
