Re: Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1
On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 06:17:12PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: Can you try libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1 once more now that the buildds are done with gdal? Done Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1
Hi Andreas, On 10/25/2014 09:58 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:25:21AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: I've just filed a binnmu bug to have it rebuilt (#766694). As usual ping me once I should retry the build (even if stuff in experimental should not be that urgent). While the binnmu by the Release Team was sufficient to build libgdal-grass, the recent upload of gdal/1.11.1+dfsg-1~exp2 is even better due to the updated symbols. Can you try libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1 once more now that the buildds are done with gdal? Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1
Hi Bas, On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:25:21AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 10/24/2014 11:03 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: -Need to get 35.1 MB/116 MB of archives. After unpacking 494 MB will be used. -The following packages have unmet dependencies: - libjpeg62-turbo : Conflicts: libjpeg62 but 1:1.3.1-8 is to be installed. - libjpeg62 : Depends: libjpeg62-turbo (= 1:1.3.1-8) but 1:1.3.1-10 is to be installed. -Unable to resolve dependencies! Giving up... This seems to be caused by gdal 1.11.1 in experimental not having been rebuilt for the jpeg-turbo transition. Seems this transition creates some trouble (and by chance I had a talk to the libjpeg developer last weekend who thinks it is a really unfortunate move - but that's another topic). I've just filed a binnmu bug to have it rebuilt (#766694). As usual ping me once I should retry the build (even if stuff in experimental should not be that urgent). Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1
On 10/23/2014 11:36 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 10/23/2014 10:22 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:11:59PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: Unfortunately this packages also suffers from the libjpeg62-turbo unmet build dependency, so it cannot be built at the moment. ... so we can keep on sorting out since the problem seems to remain. 0 packages upgraded, 228 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 36.9 MB/115 MB of archives. After unpacking 491 MB will be used. The following packages have unmet dependencies: pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy : Depends: libgdal-dev (= 1.11.1-1~) but 1.10.1+dfsg-8+b3 is to be installed. Unable to resolve dependencies! Giving up... The following NEW packages will be installed: I even fetched a fresh clone via gbp-clone and did the steps you suggested above. :-( The git repo looks good, and the version in the unmet Depends too. I cannot reproduce this problem with my sid+experimental chroot which is setup like yours as described in: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-grass-devel/2014-September/021973.html Interestingly here apt reports 229 newly installed, yours one less. I've attached my build log for comparison. Did you find out what the missing package on your build was? Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:15:43AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 10/23/2014 11:36 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 10/23/2014 10:22 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:11:59PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: Unfortunately this packages also suffers from the libjpeg62-turbo unmet build dependency, so it cannot be built at the moment. ... so we can keep on sorting out since the problem seems to remain. 0 packages upgraded, 228 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 36.9 MB/115 MB of archives. After unpacking 491 MB will be used. The following packages have unmet dependencies: pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy : Depends: libgdal-dev (= 1.11.1-1~) but 1.10.1+dfsg-8+b3 is to be installed. Unable to resolve dependencies! Giving up... The following NEW packages will be installed: I even fetched a fresh clone via gbp-clone and did the steps you suggested above. :-( The git repo looks good, and the version in the unmet Depends too. I cannot reproduce this problem with my sid+experimental chroot which is setup like yours as described in: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-grass-devel/2014-September/021973.html Interestingly here apt reports 229 newly installed, yours one less. I've attached my build log for comparison. Did you find out what the missing package on your build was? No, I need to find the diff of the build log (since lacking a better idea) but I can't do this right now. Hope to manage this later this afternoon. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1
On 10/24/2014 11:34 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:15:43AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 10/23/2014 11:36 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: I cannot reproduce this problem with my sid+experimental chroot which is setup like yours as described in: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-grass-devel/2014-September/021973.html Interestingly here apt reports 229 newly installed, yours one less. I've attached my build log for comparison. Did you find out what the missing package on your build was? No, I need to find the diff of the build log (since lacking a better idea) but I can't do this right now. Hope to manage this later this afternoon. I can reproduce the problem using a sid-only pbuilder chroot. With a sid+experimental or plain experimental chroot the jpeg-turbo unmet dependency prevents the build. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1
On 10/24/2014 11:03 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: -Need to get 35.1 MB/116 MB of archives. After unpacking 494 MB will be used. -The following packages have unmet dependencies: - libjpeg62-turbo : Conflicts: libjpeg62 but 1:1.3.1-8 is to be installed. - libjpeg62 : Depends: libjpeg62-turbo (= 1:1.3.1-8) but 1:1.3.1-10 is to be installed. -Unable to resolve dependencies! Giving up... This seems to be caused by gdal 1.11.1 in experimental not having been rebuilt for the jpeg-turbo transition. I've just filed a binnmu bug to have it rebuilt (#766694). Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1
Hi Bas, On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 09:10:43PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: [no love for enigmail today] try mutt ;-) switched to public discussion anyway. For very strange reasons I get 0 packages upgraded, 228 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 37.7 MB/115 MB of archives. After unpacking 491 MB will be used. The following packages have unmet dependencies: pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy : Depends: libgdal-dev (= 1.11.0-1~) but 1.10.1+dfsg-8+b3 is to be installed. Unable to resolve dependencies! Giving up... The following NEW packages will be installed: and yes, I have experimental sources.list enabled in my pbuilder environment and updated cowbuilder. I vaguely remember that we had such a case before but I forgot how we solved this. Thanks for the preparation Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1
Hi Bas On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:11:59PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: It looks like your experimental branch is outdated, gdal-grass 1.11.1 build depends on libgdal-dev (= 1.11.1-1~). Pulling the experimental branch should suffice to fix this specific issue: git fetch origin git checkout experimental git pull I did so: $ git log commit 4b4b0f7a63c8d35f86489e9ed515372dc35ef650 Author: Bas Couwenberg sebas...@xs4all.nl Date: Sun Oct 12 16:17:07 2014 +0200 Set distribution to experimental. commit 076103ba71effe043ea0bec659ae1784ddfe6cea Author: Bas Couwenberg sebas...@xs4all.nl Date: Sat Oct 11 18:10:43 2014 +0200 Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.6, no changes. ... $ git branch * experimental master pristine-tar upstream Unfortunately this packages also suffers from the libjpeg62-turbo unmet build dependency, so it cannot be built at the moment. ... so we can keep on sorting out since the problem seems to remain. 0 packages upgraded, 228 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 36.9 MB/115 MB of archives. After unpacking 491 MB will be used. The following packages have unmet dependencies: pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy : Depends: libgdal-dev (= 1.11.1-1~) but 1.10.1+dfsg-8+b3 is to be installed. Unable to resolve dependencies! Giving up... The following NEW packages will be installed: I even fetched a fresh clone via gbp-clone and did the steps you suggested above. :-( Thanks for your all your sponsorship efforts. I admit I'm waiting for the time when three or four of you new activists in Debian GIS will become DM. I also tried to encourage Ross and Johan to apply. You all do pretty good work and it is time to gain the official status. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1
Hi Andreas, On 10/23/2014 10:22 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:11:59PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: It looks like your experimental branch is outdated, gdal-grass 1.11.1 build depends on libgdal-dev (= 1.11.1-1~). Pulling the experimental branch should suffice to fix this specific issue: git fetch origin git checkout experimental git pull I did so: $ git log commit 4b4b0f7a63c8d35f86489e9ed515372dc35ef650 Author: Bas Couwenberg sebas...@xs4all.nl Date: Sun Oct 12 16:17:07 2014 +0200 Set distribution to experimental. [...] Unfortunately this packages also suffers from the libjpeg62-turbo unmet build dependency, so it cannot be built at the moment. ... so we can keep on sorting out since the problem seems to remain. 0 packages upgraded, 228 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 36.9 MB/115 MB of archives. After unpacking 491 MB will be used. The following packages have unmet dependencies: pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy : Depends: libgdal-dev (= 1.11.1-1~) but 1.10.1+dfsg-8+b3 is to be installed. Unable to resolve dependencies! Giving up... The following NEW packages will be installed: I even fetched a fresh clone via gbp-clone and did the steps you suggested above. :-( The git repo looks good, and the version in the unmet Depends too. I cannot reproduce this problem with my sid+experimental chroot which is setup like yours as described in: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-grass-devel/2014-September/021973.html Interestingly here apt reports 229 newly installed, yours one less. I've attached my build log for comparison. Thanks for your all your sponsorship efforts. I admit I'm waiting for the time when three or four of you new activists in Debian GIS will become DM. I also tried to encourage Ross and Johan to apply. You all do pretty good work and it is time to gain the official status. I just pinged my AM again to see if we can get moving again. Kind regards Andreas. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 libgdal-grass_1.11.1-1~exp1_amd64.build.gz Description: application/gzip ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
