Re: ant package reorganizing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Barry Hawkins wrote: Wolfgang Baer wrote: [...] there are no comments until today - so its seems everyone is OK with an upload of this package to the archive ? [...] +1 I already +1 on irc - -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDL9Cn4vzFZu62tMIRAiiYAJ9I5Yhz0kuA2h+mjkT835KXQZmhrwCgn++N 8DDCHkLgVOunYtDm9VuHnRA= =+iF8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Processing of dresden-ocl_1.1-7_powerpc.changes
dresden-ocl_1.1-7_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: dresden-ocl_1.1-7.dsc dresden-ocl_1.1-7.diff.gz libocl-argo-java_1.1-7_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
dresden-ocl_1.1-7_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: dresden-ocl_1.1-7.diff.gz to pool/contrib/d/dresden-ocl/dresden-ocl_1.1-7.diff.gz dresden-ocl_1.1-7.dsc to pool/contrib/d/dresden-ocl/dresden-ocl_1.1-7.dsc libocl-argo-java_1.1-7_all.deb to pool/contrib/d/dresden-ocl/libocl-argo-java_1.1-7_all.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
libgef-java_0.11.1-1_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: libgef-java_0.11.1-1.diff.gz to pool/contrib/libg/libgef-java/libgef-java_0.11.1-1.diff.gz libgef-java_0.11.1-1.dsc to pool/contrib/libg/libgef-java/libgef-java_0.11.1-1.dsc libgef-java_0.11.1-1_all.deb to pool/contrib/libg/libgef-java/libgef-java_0.11.1-1_all.deb libgef-java_0.11.1.orig.tar.gz to pool/contrib/libg/libgef-java/libgef-java_0.11.1.orig.tar.gz Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Processing of libnsuml-java_0.4.20-12_powerpc.changes
libnsuml-java_0.4.20-12_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libnsuml-java_0.4.20-12.dsc libnsuml-java_0.4.20-12.diff.gz libnsuml-java_0.4.20-12_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
libnsuml-java_0.4.20-12_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: libnsuml-java_0.4.20-12.diff.gz to pool/main/libn/libnsuml-java/libnsuml-java_0.4.20-12.diff.gz libnsuml-java_0.4.20-12.dsc to pool/main/libn/libnsuml-java/libnsuml-java_0.4.20-12.dsc libnsuml-java_0.4.20-12_all.deb to pool/main/libn/libnsuml-java/libnsuml-java_0.4.20-12_all.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#227741: kaffe FTBFS on buildd for ARM
this may be fixed in 1.1.6-pre2/1.1.6 using ecj for building on arm (and other platforms where jikes screws up royally, like mipsel). Needs to be tried out. cheers, dalibor topic ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#329229: kaffe: Kaffe's jar breaks subversion build, should switch to fastjar
Package: kaffe Version: 2:1.1.5-3 Severity: normal Kaffe's jar breaks the subversion buils on exotic platforms. Kaffe in debian (and upstrea) should therefore switch to fastjar. In debian, that can be done by making the Kaffe package depend on fastjar, and patch the jar script in kaffe to invoke fastjar rather than kaffe's own jar. cheers, dalibor topic -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.12.3.p4 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages kaffe depends on: ii kaffe-pthreads2:1.1.5-3 A POSIX threads enabled version of -- no debconf information ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#329245: Minor RFC 2109 / 2965 violation
Package: libcommons-httpclient-java Version: 2.0.2-1 Severity: minor Tags: upstream The following bug is present in upstream, 2.0.2 and 3.0RC3, at least as far as I can tell by testing. The specification grammar for the Cookie and Cookie2 HTTP headers (specified by RFC 2109 section 4.3.4, and RFC 2965 section 3.3.4, respectively) require that the ordering of pairs is Version, NAME, path, domain (and, in RFC 2965, port after domain). However, HTTPClient produces a cookie string with the domain pair appearing before, rather than after, the path pair. The RFCs specifically *do not* use either the grammar or the clarifying text (can occur in any order) that occurs in the sections that define the Set-Cookie and Set-Cookie2 headers (4.2.2 and 3.2.2, respectively). Since the sections in question do not, in fact, discuss the issue of pair ordering in Set-Cookie/Set-Cookie2 at all (other than in using a grammar that clearly expresses the requirement), and since the complimentary header explicitly permits them to occur in any order, it seems likely that HTTPClient is not the only client with this issue, and that most servers will accomodate this situation (in fact, for it to have gone unnoticed for this long, it seems likely that either I'm badly misreading the specification, or no major server has a problem coping with this). However, while I believe that should make this a 'minor' bug, I do consider it more than 'wishlist' - the early RFCs had strong reasons for establishing 'be conservative in what you send' as well as 'be liberal in what you accept', and fixing this seems likely to be fairly straightforward (though given the state of 3.0RC3, I would, I would expect it may well not show up until 3.0.1 or 3.1 or 4.0 or... whatever comes next). -- Joel Aelwyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] ,''`. : :' : `. `' `- signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#329245: Minor RFC 2109 / 2965 violation
Hi Joel, Joel Aelwyn wrote: However, while I believe that should make this a 'minor' bug, I do consider it more than 'wishlist' - the early RFCs had strong reasons for establishing 'be conservative in what you send' as well as 'be liberal in what you accept', and fixing this seems likely to be fairly straightforward (though given the state of 3.0RC3, I would, I would expect it may well not show up until 3.0.1 or 3.1 or 4.0 or... whatever comes next). Just received a comment from upstream that its targeted for 3.0 RC4. If you are interested in the followups from upstream: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36740 Regards, Wolfgang ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
