libcommons-validator-java_1.1.4-4_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Installer 

Accepted:
libcommons-validator-java_1.1.4-4.diff.gz
  to 
pool/main/libc/libcommons-validator-java/libcommons-validator-java_1.1.4-4.diff.gz
libcommons-validator-java_1.1.4-4.dsc
  to 
pool/main/libc/libcommons-validator-java/libcommons-validator-java_1.1.4-4.dsc
libcommons-validator-java_1.1.4-4_all.deb
  to 
pool/main/libc/libcommons-validator-java/libcommons-validator-java_1.1.4-4_all.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 335826 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers

Bug#334878: marked as done (libbatik-java: Wrong libraries included (?))

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Fri, 28 Oct 2005 06:17:06 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#334878: fixed in batik 1.6-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Oct 2005 13:25:38 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 20 06:25:38 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from ip-svs-1.informatik.uni-oldenburg.de 
(aechz.svs.informatik.uni-oldenburg.de) [134.106.12.126] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ESaQM-0007VW-00; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 06:25:38 -0700
Received: from walker.pmhahn.de (walker.svs.informatik.uni-oldenburg.de 
[134.106.22.19])
by aechz.svs.informatik.uni-oldenburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 
B532937C87;
Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:25:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by walker.pmhahn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 434225D670; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:24:06 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Philipp Matthias Hahn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libbatik-java: Wrong libraries included (?)
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:24:06 +0200
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: libbatik-java
Version: 1.6-1
Severity: important

$ cat /usr/share/doc/libbatik-java/README.Debian
...
batik.jar (full library)
batik-ext.jar (batik dom and sax bindings)
batik-all.jar (batik without dom and sax bindings)
...
$ cd /usr/share/java;ls -lgG batik-*
-rw-r--r--  1 2609200 2005-10-19 11:02 batik-all-1.6.jar
lrwxrwxrwx  1  17 2005-10-20 09:57 batik-all.jar - batik-all-1.6.jar
-rw-r--r--  1   73641 2005-10-19 11:02 batik-ext-1.6.jar
lrwxrwxrwx  1  17 2005-10-20 09:57 batik-ext.jar - batik-ext-1.6.jar
-rw-r--r--  1 2609200 2005-10-19 11:02 batik-libs-1.6.jar
lrwxrwxrwx  1  18 2005-10-20 09:57 batik-libs.jar - batik-libs-1.6.jar
$ jar tf batik-all-1.6.jar | sort -u  /tmp/all
$ jar tf batik-libs-1.6.jar | sort -u  /tmp/lib
$ diff /tmp/all /tmp/lib
$

1. There is no batik.jar as mentioned in the README.Debian
2. -all and -libs contains the same files
3. I'd like to also have Squiggle, the viewer application, please

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (989, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.4-walker
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages libbatik-java depends on:
ii  j2re1.3 [java2-run 1.3.1-1.1 Blackdown Java(TM) 2 Runtime Envir
ii  libavalon-framewor 4.2.0-1   Common framework for Java server a
ii  libbsf-java1:2.3.0+cvs20050308-5 Bean Scripting Framework to suppor
ii  libcommons-io-java 1.0-2 Common useful IO related classes
ii  libcommons-logging 1.0.4-3   commmon wrapper interface for seve
ii  libxalan2-java 2.6.0-5   XSL Transformations (XSLT) process

libbatik-java recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 334878-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Oct 2005 13:18:51 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 28 06:18:51 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EVU6U-0004yX-00; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 06:17:06 -0700
From: Wolfgang Baer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#334878: fixed in batik 1.6-2
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 06:17:06 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: batik
Source-Version: 1.6-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
batik, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

batik_1.6-2.diff.gz
  to pool/contrib/b/batik/batik_1.6-2.diff.gz
batik_1.6-2.dsc
  to

Bug#335883: marked as done (libbatik-java: Fop in batik depends on libavalon-framework-java = 4.2.0)

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Fri, 28 Oct 2005 06:17:06 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#335883: fixed in batik 1.6-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Oct 2005 13:32:44 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 26 06:32:44 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from palrel13.hp.com [156.153.255.238] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EUlOW-0007A9-00; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 06:32:44 -0700
Received: from baobab.gre.hp.com (baobab.gre.hp.com [16.16.208.232])
by palrel13.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF6E61C02AF1;
Wed, 26 Oct 2005 06:32:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [16.57.181.177])
by baobab.gre.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id DD62525691; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 15:31:19 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Eric Lavarde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libbatik-java: Fop in batik depends on libavalon-framework-java = 
4.2.0
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 15:32:13 +0200
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: libbatik-java
Version: 1.6-1
Severity: normal


Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Eric Lavarde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libbatik-java: Fop in batik depends on libavalon-framework-java = 
4.2.0
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 15:29:13 +0200

Package: libbatik-java
Version: 1.6-1
Severity: minor

Hi,

while using FreeMind under Sarge + batik from unstable, I got the
following error:

java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: 
org/apache/avalon/framework/container/ContainerUtil
at org.apache.fop.svg.PDFTranscoder.transcode(PDFTranscoder.java:121)
at org.apache.batik.transcoder.XMLAbstractTranscoder.transcode(Unknown 
Source)
at org.apache.batik.transcoder.SVGAbstractTranscoder.transcode(Unknown 
Source)
at plugins.svg.ExportPdf.startupMapHook(ExportPdf.java:70)

At that time, I had libavalon-framework-java 4.1.2-2.1; after upgrade to
version 4.2.0-1, the issue was solved. This means that batik should
depend at least upon this version.

As this might not impact many people, I think a minor severity is OK.

Thanks, Eric

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-5.99.sarge1
Locale: LANG=en_IE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_IE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages libbatik-java depends on:
ii  libavalon-framewor 4.2.0-1   Common framework for Java server a
ii  libbsf-java1:2.3.0+cvs20050308-2 Bean Scripting Framework to suppor
ii  libcommons-io-java 1.0-2 Common useful IO related classes
ii  libcommons-logging 1.0.4-2   The commmon wrapper interface for 
ii  libxalan2-java 2.6.0-1   XSL Transformations (XSLT) process
ii  sun-j2re1.5 [java2 1.5.0+update03Java(TM) 2 RE, Standard Edition, S
ii  sun-j2sdk1.4 [j2re 1.4.2+08  Java(TM) 2 SDK, Standard Edition, 

libbatik-java recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-5.99.sarge1
Locale: LANG=en_IE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_IE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages libbatik-java depends on:
ii  libavalon-framewor 4.2.0-1   Common framework for Java server a
ii  libbsf-java1:2.3.0+cvs20050308-2 Bean Scripting Framework to suppor
ii  libcommons-io-java 1.0-2 Common useful IO related classes
ii  libcommons-logging 1.0.4-2   The commmon wrapper interface for 
ii  libxalan2-java 2.6.0-1   XSL Transformations (XSLT) process
ii  sun-j2re1.5 [java2 1.5.0+update03

Bug#306509: marked as done (lucene cvs head, kaffe rmic)

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Fri, 28 Oct 2005 15:46:11 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Fixed through combination of kaffe, ant
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Apr 2005 02:25:12 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 26 19:25:12 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from defout.telus.net (priv-edtnes82.telusplanet.net) 
[199.185.220.240] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DQcEi-0002Wi-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 19:25:12 -0700
Received: from tor.lat ([205.250.104.75]) by priv-edtnes82.telusplanet.net
  (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with ESMTP
  id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 20:24:41 -0600
Received: by tor.lat (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id D83DFE01B; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 19:24:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.179.9] (kas.ruz.lat [192.168.179.9])
by tor.lat (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20313E012
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 19:24:37 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: lucene cvs head, kaffe rmic
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 19:24:34 -0700
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2)
X-Face: #..0OTm4cDCHwG[!aCF/-vw$N5mfb58T+T\IP+^JU{FpY!%;y6(71_LfzLJn6Q)3th4.Db{

e4P)Cjq5t~_OJ+*5:($4eJck-+`;C%SnMgY}PN[(j;O8Y(WY=cZm;}(P_7p8V7E%.8i(;-Ga

W)KDF0sJO!ap4-:fcXd=jq,fb-)KiBd9)F`rD42:p.\k/t%,V3^fGMyb[8w$K{f3[/[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
@kf|_a''|[n6:CJ8_$1e(rp8jj0bj\lw6z`-9;0Pw!cd$/)SnC'9;vjC2?%11+rPmw
X-Hashcash: 1:20:050427:[EMAIL PROTECTED]::ok0ha/eWHfud1/Ya:000
4qM2
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.2 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_PACKAGE,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: ant
Version: 1.6.2

I failed to build the lucene cvs head using ant 1.6.2 -


myhost% JAVA_HOME=/usr/share/kaffe ant -Dbuild.rmic=kaffe ant
[...]
BUILD FAILED
/home/jablko/src/lucene/svn/lucene/java/trunk/build.xml:165: Cannot use 
Kaffe rmic, as it is not available.  A common solution is to set the 
environment variable JAVA_HOME or CLASSPATH.

Total time: 57 seconds
myhost%


Complete build log - 
http://www.sfu.ca/~jdbates/tmp/ant/200504260/build.log

I guess the problem is ant's kaffe rmic adaptor - KaffeRmic.java -  
the new path to kaffe rmic - 
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.gump/9604

This bug is fixed in ant cvs head - I successfully built lucene with 
the latest ant - it's just not fixed in debian yet

Many thanks for maintaining free java tools!

Jack


---
Received: (at 306509-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Oct 2005 13:43:40 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 28 06:43:40 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.gmx.de (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20] 
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EVUWC-0003vU-00; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 06:43:40 -0700
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 28 Oct 2005 13:43:08 -
Received: from p5481A423.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.0.203]) 
[84.129.164.35]
  by mail.gmx.net (mp029) with SMTP; 28 Oct 2005 15:43:08 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1941950
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 15:46:11 +0200
From: Wolfgang Baer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed through combination of kaffe, ant
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: ant
Version: 1.6.5-3

A new rmic compiler in the new 1.1.6 kaffe package together
with new ant packages has fixed this bug. Closing.

___
pkg-java-maintainers

Bug#335227: kaffe: rmic throws an exception when no -d option is given

2005-10-28 Thread Wolfgang Baer 

Hi,

this is a bug in the runtime library implementation exposed
by the rmic implementation.

A fix is already submitted upstream and will be part of
a future kaffe upload or release.

Thanks for reporting,
Wolfgang


___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers

Bug#335622: jmp: fails to start

2005-10-28 Thread Wolfgang Baer 

reassign 335622 kaffe 2:1.1.6-3
forwarded 335622 kaffe@kaffe.org
retitle 335622 kaffe shows error during jmp shutdown on ppc
thanks

Hi Benoît,

I reassign the bug to kaffe which is the cause of the error during
shutdown and forward it upstream.

Benoît Dejean wrote:

Can you please test if this is reproducible or only happens
sometimes ?



every time


Thanks for testing.


I noticed that i was unable to close jmp, the [x] buttons do nothing. Is
that alright ?


I think so - its the same here on x86 and also with SUNs JDK.

Wolfgang



___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers

Bugs of libapache2-mod-jk2 package

2005-10-28 Thread Wolfgang Baer 

Hi all,

libapache2-mod-jk2 package has been removed from the archive.
The open bugs are not for reassigning because mod-jk has a
different codebase, configuration ...

So the question is (as the package will be still available in
sarge) how to properly close the bugs for testing/unstable
with the new version tracking.

The last version is 2.0.4-3 so I ask myself if closing with
a version header of the not existing version 2.0.4-4 will
correctly close it for testing/unstable ?

Comments are welcome,

Wolfgang

___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers

Bug#336245: libpgjava: use upstream package name

2005-10-28 Thread Peter Eisentraut 
Package: libpgjava
Version: 8.0-312-1
Severity: wishlist

As long as you are randomly renaming the package, shouldn't you use the
upstream package name?  That would be postgresql-jdbc so the package
should be called libpostgresql-jdbc-java.  That would also have the nice
side effect that people looking for postgresql or jdbc actually find
something rather than having to guess at Debian's arbitrary abbreviation scheme.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages libpgjava depends on:
ii  libpg-java8.0-312-1  Java database (JDBC) driver for Po

libpgjava recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers

Bug#336245: libpgjava: use upstream package name

2005-10-28 Thread Wolfgang Baer 

Hi Peter,

Peter Eisentraut wrote:

Package: libpgjava
Version: 8.0-312-1
Severity: wishlist

As long as you are randomly renaming the package, shouldn't you use the
upstream package name?  


I would not call it randomly - it was a change to comply with java policy !


That would be postgresql-jdbc so the package
should be called libpostgresql-jdbc-java.  That would also have the nice
side effect that people looking for postgresql or jdbc actually find
something rather than having to guess at Debian's arbitrary abbreviation scheme.


Well, I am open to suggestions and you are right that using upstreams name
would be better from our users pov. So what are you proposing ?

Currently the following programs rdepend on libpgjava:
rhdb-explain - you are the maintainer
libpostgis-java - RC buggy needs new upload anyway
And openoffice.org-base depends on libpg-java.

libpgjava is part of sarge and therefore a transitional package
as now exists needs to be kept. We can just rename libpg-java into
libpostgresql-jdbc-java.

Comments ?

Wolfgang





___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers

Bug#336245: libpgjava: use upstream package name

2005-10-28 Thread Sanghyeon Seo 
On 10/29/05, Wolfgang Baer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 libpgjava is part of sarge and therefore a transitional package
 as now exists needs to be kept. We can just rename libpg-java into
 libpostgresql-jdbc-java.

 Comments ?

According to my table,
http://sparcs.kaist.ac.kr/~tinuviel/package/list.cgi?name=java

Debian: libpg-java
Gentoo: jdbc3-postgresql
FreeBSD: postgresql-jdbc

Here's MySQL JDBC driver for the reference:

Debian: libmysql-java
Gentoo: jdbc-mysql
FreeBSD: mysql-connector-java

Seo Sanghyeon


___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers