Processed: tagging 342789

2005-12-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
 tags 342789 moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#342789: eclipse: Eclipse crashes at startup
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


Bug#342341: eclipse: too many unneeded dependencies

2005-12-16 Thread Erwan David
Le Fri 16/12/2005, Michael Koch disait
 On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 09:32:11AM +0100, Erwan David wrote:
  Le Wed 14/12/2005, Michael Koch disait
  
   I would like that you check the facts before writing such words.
   
   You are free not to use the Eclipse packaged by Debian but e.g. the Help
   system which is a vital system for some users will not work. Other
   thinks don't work either. Upstream Eclipse 3.1.1 don't works with free
   java runtimes at all because of broken memory management in JDT.
  
  It works perfectly without mozilla. It needs a browser but that's why
  every browser package has a Provides: www-browser, so the dependency
  should be on www-browser, not mozilla-browser.
 
 Not all packages providing www-browser export the needed shared library
 for the embedded browser in Eclipse, which is the default and preferred
 way in Eclipse upstream as Billy wrote.
  
  And that doies not explain th gnome dependency, which is heavier, and
  tottaly inadequate and, I repeat DANGEROUS.
 
 Eclipse doesn't depend on gnome, just on some libraries gnome provides.
 Many applications do this. That is neither heavy nor totally inadequate.
 Our goal is to make Eclipse ready-to-use after a simple



 'apt-get install eclipse'

No eclipse (the software) depends on *gtk* libs. Even eclipse.org does
not cite gnome as a requirements. *YOU* impose gnome.
 
 To make this happen we have to depend on some stuff that may not be
 needed but is needed in the default configuration of Eclipse. When you
 don't need this features, don't use them.
 
 It is definitely NOT DANGEROUS. Data loss would be DANGEROUS.

Gnome IS a danger becaéuse its goal is to impose a tatlly inadequate
way of using a computer to people who do not want it. Gnome is
contrary to the freedom of the user.

-- 
Erwan David



___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


Bug#342341: eclipse: too many unneeded dependencies

2005-12-16 Thread Dalibor Topic
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 09:19:43AM +0100, Erwan David wrote:
 Le Fri 16/12/2005, Michael Koch disait
  On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 09:32:11AM +0100, Erwan David wrote:
   Le Wed 14/12/2005, Michael Koch disait
   
I would like that you check the facts before writing such words.

You are free not to use the Eclipse packaged by Debian but e.g. the Help
system which is a vital system for some users will not work. Other
thinks don't work either. Upstream Eclipse 3.1.1 don't works with free
java runtimes at all because of broken memory management in JDT.
   
   It works perfectly without mozilla. It needs a browser but that's why
   every browser package has a Provides: www-browser, so the dependency
   should be on www-browser, not mozilla-browser.
  
  Not all packages providing www-browser export the needed shared library
  for the embedded browser in Eclipse, which is the default and preferred
  way in Eclipse upstream as Billy wrote.
   
   And that doies not explain th gnome dependency, which is heavier, and
   tottaly inadequate and, I repeat DANGEROUS.
  
  Eclipse doesn't depend on gnome, just on some libraries gnome provides.
  Many applications do this. That is neither heavy nor totally inadequate.
  Our goal is to make Eclipse ready-to-use after a simple
 
 
 
  'apt-get install eclipse'
 
 No eclipse (the software) depends on *gtk* libs. Even eclipse.org does
 not cite gnome as a requirements. *YOU* impose gnome.
  
  To make this happen we have to depend on some stuff that may not be
  needed but is needed in the default configuration of Eclipse. When you
  don't need this features, don't use them.
  
  It is definitely NOT DANGEROUS. Data loss would be DANGEROUS.
 
 Gnome IS a danger beca?use its goal is to impose a tatlly inadequate
 way of using a computer to people who do not want it. Gnome is
 contrary to the freedom of the user.

OK. I've had enough of this, please.

Since the technical side of the bug report has been excessively dealt with, 
I suggest closing it as not a bug, since we have an Eclipse developer's 
confirmation.

As far as the non-technical side of the bug report goes, I'd suggest
that Erwin takes that discussion somewhere else. We're building a
universal operating system, and abusing the bug tracker for flamewars
does not help. Thank you.

cheers,
dalibor topic

 
 -- 
 Erwan David
 
 
 
 ___
 pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
 pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
 http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


Bug#342341: marked as done (eclipse: too many unneeded dependencies)

2005-12-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 12:17:21 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#342341: eclipse: too many unneeded dependencies
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Dec 2005 09:54:05 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 07 01:54:05 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.trusted-logic.com ([62.240.237.76] ident=postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ejvzx-0004zt-60
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 01:54:05 -0800
Received: from localhost (crozetdeux [127.0.0.1])
by mail.trusted-logic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB4B12A0129;
Wed,  7 Dec 2005 10:54:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail.trusted-logic.com ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (crozetdeux [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 12149-04; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 10:54:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: from maio.trusted-logic.fr (maio.trusted-logic.fr [192.168.1.133])
by mail.trusted-logic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB90D2A010E;
Wed,  7 Dec 2005 10:54:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (maio.trusted-logic.fr [127.0.0.1])
by maio.trusted-logic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8797653C05A;
Wed,  7 Dec 2005 10:54:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: from maio.trusted-logic.fr ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (maio [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
id 20371-06; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 10:54:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: from brehat.trusted-logic.fr (brehat.trusted-logic.fr [192.168.4.130])
by maio.trusted-logic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 759C553C03D;
Wed,  7 Dec 2005 10:54:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: by brehat.trusted-logic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 49038C79C3; Wed,  7 Dec 2005 10:54:02 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Erwan David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: eclipse: too many unneeded dependencies
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 10:54:02 +0100
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at trusted-logic.fr
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at trusted-logic.fr
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: eclipse
Severity: normal

sudo apt-get -u install eclipse
Password:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
  dbus-1 dbus-glib-1 eclipse-jdt eclipse-jdt-common eclipse-pde
  eclipse-pde-common eclipse-platform eclipse-platform-common eclipse-rcp
  eclipse-rcp-common eclipse-source gconf2 gconf2-common gnome-keyring
  gnome-mime-data junit libbcel-java libbonobo2-0 libbonobo2-common
  libbonoboui2-0 libbonoboui2-common libcommons-beanutils-java
  libcommons-collections-java libcommons-collections3-java
  libcommons-dbcp-java libcommons-digester-java libcommons-el-java
  libcommons-fileupload-java libcommons-launcher-java libcommons-logging-java
  libcommons-modeler-java libcommons-pool-java libfam0c102 libgconf2-4
  libgnome-keyring0 libgnome2-0 libgnome2-common libgnomecanvas2-0
  libgnomecanvas2-common libgnomeui-0 libgnomeui-common libgnomevfs2-0
  libgnomevfs2-common libhal-storage0 libhal0 libjsch-java liblog4j1.2-java
  liblucene-java liblucene-java-doc libmx4j-java liborbit2 libregexp-java
  libscrollkeeper0 libservlet2.4-java libsmbclient libswt3.1-gtk-java
  libswt3.1-gtk-jni libtomcat5-java mozilla-browser scrollkeeper
  shared-mime-info zenity

Which means 195 MB on disk...

eclipse does not need gnome, so there is a dependency problem on this
side. Same thing with mozilla-browser.

In any case this makes the package uninstallable here (no gnome).

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-1-k7
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

---
Received: (at 342341-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Dec 2005 10:14:27 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 16 02:14:27 

Processed: tagging 343177

2005-12-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
 tags 343177 + confirmed pending
Bug#343177: the jetty package should depend on apache2-utils
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed, pending


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


Bug#342789: eclipse: Eclipse crashes at startup

2005-12-16 Thread Mats Cronqvist

  hello,

  i have the exact same problem on my debian/unstable box. i have these 
packages (downloaded from packages.debian.org).


$ dpkg -l | grep eclipse
ii  eclipse-platform 3.1.1-6  Eclipse platform 
without plug-ins to develop
ii  eclipse-platform-common  3.1.1-6  Eclipse platform 
without plug-ins to develop
ii  eclipse-rcp  3.1.1-6  Eclipse rich 
client platform
ii  eclipse-rcp-common   3.1.1-6  Eclipse rich 
client platform (common files)
ii  eclipse-rcp-gcj  3.1.1-6  Eclipse rich 
client platform (GCJ version)


  anything i can do to help?
  i am unfortunately completetly ignorant in all things eclipse and java :)

  mats


___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


Bug#342789: eclipse: Eclipse crashes at startup

2005-12-16 Thread Mats Cronqvist



Michael Koch wrote:

On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 01:40:30PM +0100, Mats Cronqvist wrote:


 hello,

 i have the exact same problem on my debian/unstable box. i have these 
packages (downloaded from packages.debian.org).


$ dpkg -l | grep eclipse
ii  eclipse-platform 3.1.1-6  Eclipse 
platform without plug-ins to develop
ii  eclipse-platform-common  3.1.1-6  Eclipse 
platform without plug-ins to develop
ii  eclipse-rcp  3.1.1-6  Eclipse rich 
client platform
ii  eclipse-rcp-common   3.1.1-6  Eclipse rich 
client platform (common files)
ii  eclipse-rcp-gcj  3.1.1-6  Eclipse rich 
client platform (GCJ version)


 anything i can do to help?
 i am unfortunately completetly ignorant in all things eclipse and java :)



For Eclipse you are at least missing some packages. Please do
'apt-get install eclipse' to get everything needed installed.


  well that worked like a charm. spologies for wasting your time.

  mats


___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


Bug#342341: eclipse: too many unneeded dependencies

2005-12-16 Thread Billy Biggs

On 16-Dec-05, at 3:19 AM, Erwan David wrote:


No eclipse (the software) depends on *gtk* libs. Even eclipse.org does
not cite gnome as a requirements. *YOU* impose gnome.


  Erwan, what part about my description of our use of GNOME is
confusing?

  We use GNOME-VFS to implement the Program API.  It's used to:

   - determine what your system web browser is
   - determine what application should launch if you open
 the system editor in eclipse
   - actually run these programs

  Without GNOME-VFS, the preferences dialog that lists web browsers
won't list anything, nor will the listing of external applications
for file associations, nor will the open with  system editor work,
and any applications that depend on the SWT Program API will not
work properly.

  Do you want me to change the Eclipse Platform 3.2 plan on eclipse.org
to more clearly state that we depend on gnome-vfs  I can do
this if it would help!

  -Billy




___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


Bug#342341: eclipse: too many unneeded dependencies

2005-12-16 Thread Erwan David
Le Fri 16/12/2005, Billy Biggs disait
 On 16-Dec-05, at 3:19 AM, Erwan David wrote:
 
 No eclipse (the software) depends on *gtk* libs. Even eclipse.org does
 not cite gnome as a requirements. *YOU* impose gnome.
 
   Erwan, what part about my description of our use of GNOME is
 confusing?
 
   We use GNOME-VFS to implement the Program API.  It's used to:
 
- determine what your system web browser is
- determine what application should launch if you open
  the system editor in eclipse
- actually run these programs
 
   Without GNOME-VFS, the preferences dialog that lists web browsers
 won't list anything, nor will the listing of external applications
 for file associations, nor will the open with  system editor work,
 and any applications that depend on the SWT Program API will not
 work properly.
 
   Do you want me to change the Eclipse Platform 3.2 plan on eclipse.org
 to more clearly state that we depend on gnome-vfs  I can do
 this if it would help!

Yasd that would make easier for me to explain that eclipse is a
windows only thing

If you choose to make yoursellf dependant on people who claim that
microsoft waéy is the only way to use a computer,be logical and make
windows only software.

-- 
Erwan David


___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


Bug#342341: eclipse: too many unneeded dependencies

2005-12-16 Thread Eric
Hi,

I don't want to add to the confusion, so I just reply to you. Feel to
forward if you think my email is constructive enough to be considered ;-)

 On 16-Dec-05, at 3:19 AM, Erwan David wrote:

We use GNOME-VFS to implement the Program API.  It's used to:

 - determine what your system web browser is
 - determine what application should launch if you open
   the system editor in eclipse
 - actually run these programs

Shouldn't the Debian way to determine web browser and system editor to use
the default binaries 'sensible-browser' and 'sensible-editor'?
I don't know if these binaries are policy or just a help, but perhaps, in
deed, it would allow to remove some dependencies (which, I think, is
always good, independent of all belief wars).

Just my 2 cents, Eric

-- 
Eric de France, d'Allemagne et de Navarre


___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


It`s time to Refill begin

2005-12-16 Thread Adriana Bradley
Hello,

As a valued customer, we provide you with occassional information
and updates.

Our records indicate that you may be in need of a refill.

We hope that you will once again, give us the opportunity to
offer you a great selection of meds, low prices, and superior customer
care. If you would like to place an order or browse our current
products and specials, please visit the link below:

http://freidjer.com/?fc58b735bS868ae37a77b810d109S5be

Yours Truly,

Adriana Bradley
Customer Care Specialist













penumbra you refereeing me, woven cavalier tenspot westfield . exalt you awful 
me, smith coherent ocarina . baltimorean you prolong me, masculine . bondsman 
you kin me, spooky . 
nag you completion me, twirl snotty calve . gila you plenary me, neglect 
scottsdale . 
http://www.freidjer.com/fgh.php

___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


Bug#342789: eclipse: Eclipse crashes at startup

2005-12-16 Thread xavier . gnata
Quoting Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 10:42:05AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I have already tried to remove my ~/.eclipse but it did not help.
 
 
  $ls -l /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.osgi_3.1.1.jar
  /usr/lib/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.osgi_3.1.1.jar
  lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 57 2005-12-16 00:37
  /usr/lib/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.osgi_3.1.1.jar -
  ../../../share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.osgi_3.1.1.jar
  -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 748300 2005-12-01 10:21
  /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.osgi_3.1.1.jar

 This looks okay.

  I have no java from sun anymore on my box.
 
  I have try to purge all my eclipse installation (apt-get remove --purge
  eclipse*) and to reinstall but it did not help.
 
  After this eclipse reinistall, I have tried eclipse -debug.
  Here is the first lines of log file :
 
  !SESSION 2005-12-16 10:34:11.999
 ---
  eclipse.buildId=M20050929-0840
  java.fullversion=GNU libgcj 4.0.3 20051204 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.2-5j2)
  BootLoader constants: OS=linux, ARCH=x86, WS=gtk, NL=en_US
  Command-line arguments:  -os linux -ws gtk -arch x86 -debug
 
  !ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi 2005-12-16 10:34:15.37
  !MESSAGE Bundle [EMAIL PROTECTED]/org.eclipse.jface_3.1.1.jar [10] was not
  resolved.
  !SUBENTRY 1 org.eclipse.osgi 2005-12-16 10:34:15.37
  !MESSAGE Missing required bundle org.eclipse.swt_0.0.0.
  !ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi 2005-12-16 10:34:15.39
  !MESSAGE Bundle [EMAIL PROTECTED]/org.eclipse.ui_3.1.1.jar [11] was not
 resolved.
  !SUBENTRY 1 org.eclipse.osgi 2005-12-16 10:34:15.40
  !MESSAGE Missing required bundle org.eclipse.swt_0.0.0.
  !SUBENTRY 1 org.eclipse.osgi 2005-12-16 10:34:15.40
  !MESSAGE Missing required bundle org.eclipse.jface_0.0.0.
  !SUBENTRY 1 org.eclipse.osgi 2005-12-16 10:34:15.40
  !MESSAGE Missing required bundle org.eclipse.ui.workbench_0.0.0.
 
 
  What is the best way to remove *all* the eclipse and java related files
 from my
  box (packages but also .eclipse and so on). I would like to do as clean as
  possbile install of eclipse (I would like to be sure there is no crappy
 file in
  my eclipse install).

 The versions '0.0.0' look really suspicious. They are either cached in
 ~/.eclipse or ~/workspace/.metadata. As you have already tried to remove
 the ~/.eclipse dir I guess its the later.

 Can you please try to rename your ~/workspace dir for testing purposes?
 (And rename ~/.eclipse at the same time too to have a clean start).

  If this bug is related to a crappy file which is not under control of
 eclipse
  packages, I do apologize for the noise.

 That is okay. Others might have the same problems when using eclipse. I
 still have a bad feeling that this bug is related to an XML handling bug in
 libgcj6.


 Cheers,
 Michael
 --
 Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath!
 http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html

 Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/



Hi,

Sorry but I have once again remove and purged *all* the eclipse related packages
(all eclipse + gcj and gij) than rm -rf ~/workspace and rm -rf ~/.eclipse and
then reinstall eclipse and it works.
I'm have no clue where the problem was because I have not change anything else.
I'm not sure if it was noise or not...

Xavier.


___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


Bug#343667: eclipse: Help-Help Contents launches external browser

2005-12-16 Thread Andreas Pakulat
Package: eclipse
Version: 3.1.1-6
Severity: normal

Hi,

if I'm not mistaken the help system should work such that opening the
help opens a view with an embedded gecko-browser. However choosing
Help-Help Contents launches a full firefox here. Opening the Help View
manually works however.

If the behaviour is indeed correct and I'm just stupid to think that
Help-Help Contents launches the Help-View instead of an external
browser, please immediately close this bug report.

Hmm, looking through the preferences I do see that I cannot choose to
use the internal web browser, maybe that's related?

Andreas

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'experimental'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 
'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14.3-cherry+radeon
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages eclipse depends on:
ii  eclipse-jdt   3.1.1-6Java Development Tools plug-ins fo
ii  eclipse-pde   3.1.1-6Plug-in Development Environment to
ii  eclipse-source3.1.1-6Eclipse source code plug-ins

eclipse recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers