Kone solange
Kone solange cote d'ivoire hotel manvy 01bp 431abidjan 01 tel :0022505056804 AIDE MOI S'il vous plait Cher , Permettez-moi de vous informer de mon desir d'entre dans le rapport d'affaires avec vous. J'ai obtenu votre nom et contact de la chambre de commerce de cote d'ivoire. J'ai prie plus et après cela j'ai choisi votre nom entre tant d'autres . je pense que vous etes digne de la recommandation de ma prière. je me nomme Mlle kone solange la seule fille des defunts M. et Mme kone herve. Mon père etait un negociant de cacao et exploitant d'or à Abidjan la capital economique de la Cote d'Ivoire, mon père a ete empoisonne par ses associes d'affaires. j'aimerais que vous me temoignez votre confiance afin que je fasse des affaires avec vous. Ainsi je n'aurai aucune hesitation, me fier vous pour des affaires simples et sincères. Ma mère est morte quand j'etais un bebe et depuis lors mon père m'a pris a sa charge. Avant la mort de mon père le 29novembre 2002 à abidjan. Avant son deces il m'a appelé au chevet et m'expliqua qu'il avait la somme de douze millions cinq cents mille dollars USD ($12,500.000) dans un compte d'ordre fixe/ordre dans la banque principale ici à abidjan il l'a deposé à mon nom comme etant le beneficiare de cet heritage. Il m'a egalement explique que c'etait en raison de cette richesse qu'il a ete empoisonne par ses associes d'affaires. Il à aussi conseillé de chercher un associe etranger dans un pays de mon choix ou je transfererai cet argent et l'employerai dans des investissements tel que la gestion de biens immobiliers ou la gestion d'hotel. Monsieur, je cherche honorablement votre aide des manières suivantes: (1) pour fournir un compte bancaire sur lequel transferer cet argent. (2) pour servir de gardien de ces fonds puisque j'ai seulement 22 ans. (3) Pour m'aider à immigrer dans votre pays avec une attestation de residence afin que je puisse y poursuivre mes etudes. Ainsi dit , je suis dispose à vous offrir 15% de toute la somme qui represente mon heritage en compensation pour votre effort après le transfert de ces fonds sur votre compte. En outre, vous indiquez vos options pour m'aider sachant pour moi, j'ai la foi que cette transaction peut se faire le plus vite possible. J'aimerai avoir votre point de vue sur la question et cela selon votre disponibilite. Vous pourrez me joindre dès reception du present message a mon email. ([EMAIL PROTECTED] ) Merci , que Dieu vous benisse immensement. kone solange salif1.txt Description: Binary data ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Kone solange
Kone solange cote d'ivoire hotel manvy 01bp 431abidjan 01 tel :0022505056804 AIDE MOI S'il vous plait Cher , Permettez-moi de vous informer de mon desir d'entre dans le rapport d'affaires avec vous. J'ai obtenu votre nom et contact de la chambre de commerce de cote d'ivoire. J'ai prie plus et après cela j'ai choisi votre nom entre tant d'autres . je pense que vous etes digne de la recommandation de ma prière. je me nomme Mlle kone solange la seule fille des defunts M. et Mme kone herve. Mon père etait un negociant de cacao et exploitant d'or à Abidjan la capital economique de la Cote d'Ivoire, mon père a ete empoisonne par ses associes d'affaires. j'aimerais que vous me temoignez votre confiance afin que je fasse des affaires avec vous. Ainsi je n'aurai aucune hesitation, me fier vous pour des affaires simples et sincères. Ma mère est morte quand j'etais un bebe et depuis lors mon père m'a pris a sa charge. Avant la mort de mon père le 29novembre 2002 à abidjan. Avant son deces il m'a appelé au chevet et m'expliqua qu'il avait la somme de douze millions cinq cents mille dollars USD ($12,500.000) dans un compte d'ordre fixe/ordre dans la banque principale ici à abidjan il l'a deposé à mon nom comme etant le beneficiare de cet heritage. Il m'a egalement explique que c'etait en raison de cette richesse qu'il a ete empoisonne par ses associes d'affaires. Il à aussi conseillé de chercher un associe etranger dans un pays de mon choix ou je transfererai cet argent et l'employerai dans des investissements tel que la gestion de biens immobiliers ou la gestion d'hotel. Monsieur, je cherche honorablement votre aide des manières suivantes: (1) pour fournir un compte bancaire sur lequel transferer cet argent. (2) pour servir de gardien de ces fonds puisque j'ai seulement 22 ans. (3) Pour m'aider à immigrer dans votre pays avec une attestation de residence afin que je puisse y poursuivre mes etudes. Ainsi dit , je suis dispose à vous offrir 15% de toute la somme qui represente mon heritage en compensation pour votre effort après le transfert de ces fonds sur votre compte. En outre, vous indiquez vos options pour m'aider sachant pour moi, j'ai la foi que cette transaction peut se faire le plus vite possible. J'aimerai avoir votre point de vue sur la question et cela selon votre disponibilite. Vous pourrez me joindre dès reception du present message a mon email. ([EMAIL PROTECTED] ) Merci , que Dieu vous benisse immensement. kone solange salif1.txt Description: Binary data ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Kone solange
Kone solange cote d'ivoire hotel manvy 01bp 431abidjan 01 tel :0022505056804 AIDE MOI S'il vous plait Cher , Permettez-moi de vous informer de mon desir d'entre dans le rapport d'affaires avec vous. J'ai obtenu votre nom et contact de la chambre de commerce de cote d'ivoire. J'ai prie plus et après cela j'ai choisi votre nom entre tant d'autres . je pense que vous etes digne de la recommandation de ma prière. je me nomme Mlle kone solange la seule fille des defunts M. et Mme kone herve. Mon père etait un negociant de cacao et exploitant d'or à Abidjan la capital economique de la Cote d'Ivoire, mon père a ete empoisonne par ses associes d'affaires. j'aimerais que vous me temoignez votre confiance afin que je fasse des affaires avec vous. Ainsi je n'aurai aucune hesitation, me fier vous pour des affaires simples et sincères. Ma mère est morte quand j'etais un bebe et depuis lors mon père m'a pris a sa charge. Avant la mort de mon père le 29novembre 2002 à abidjan. Avant son deces il m'a appelé au chevet et m'expliqua qu'il avait la somme de douze millions cinq cents mille dollars USD ($12,500.000) dans un compte d'ordre fixe/ordre dans la banque principale ici à abidjan il l'a deposé à mon nom comme etant le beneficiare de cet heritage. Il m'a egalement explique que c'etait en raison de cette richesse qu'il a ete empoisonne par ses associes d'affaires. Il à aussi conseillé de chercher un associe etranger dans un pays de mon choix ou je transfererai cet argent et l'employerai dans des investissements tel que la gestion de biens immobiliers ou la gestion d'hotel. Monsieur, je cherche honorablement votre aide des manières suivantes: (1) pour fournir un compte bancaire sur lequel transferer cet argent. (2) pour servir de gardien de ces fonds puisque j'ai seulement 22 ans. (3) Pour m'aider à immigrer dans votre pays avec une attestation de residence afin que je puisse y poursuivre mes etudes. Ainsi dit , je suis dispose à vous offrir 15% de toute la somme qui represente mon heritage en compensation pour votre effort après le transfert de ces fonds sur votre compte. En outre, vous indiquez vos options pour m'aider sachant pour moi, j'ai la foi que cette transaction peut se faire le plus vite possible. J'aimerai avoir votre point de vue sur la question et cela selon votre disponibilite. Vous pourrez me joindre dès reception du present message a mon email. ([EMAIL PROTECTED] ) Merci , que Dieu vous benisse immensement. kone solange salif1.txt Description: Binary data ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#351053: ftbfs: /bin/bash: -c: line 1: syntax error: unexpected end of file
Max Kellermann wrote: On 2006/02/02 17:57, Wolfgang Baer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: this is completely unreproducible here and on other machines. Please retry and if it still fails provide information about your system and versions of packages involved in the build (version of make ...) It is perfectly reproducible here. However, when I remove the comments in the for loop in debian/rules, it builds. ii bash 3.1-1 ii make 3.80-9 OK, you are running a stable/testing mixture. I'm not sure about comment syntax in lines concatenated with backslashes... might be a difference in how make passes this multiline command to bash. Yes, there were quite some discussions about changed behaviour of make 3.81 on d-devel. Maybe this is also related. If the comments are a problem I will remove them with next upload to ease stable backports after 1.1.7 is released. Thanks, Wolfgang ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#351053: ftbfs: /bin/bash: -c: line 1: syntax error: unexpected end of file
On 2006/02/02 17:57, Wolfgang Baer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: this is completely unreproducible here and on other machines. Please retry and if it still fails provide information about your system and versions of packages involved in the build (version of make ...) It is perfectly reproducible here. However, when I remove the comments in the for loop in debian/rules, it builds. ii bash 3.1-1 ii make 3.80-9 I'm not sure about comment syntax in lines concatenated with backslashes... might be a difference in how make passes this multiline command to bash. Max ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#351076: ant: Java illegalAccess exception with the kaffee compiled version
Hi Wolfgang, On Thu, 2006-02-02 18:06:34 +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote: Frohner Akos wrote: The example build.xml file reports the following error with 1.6.5-4, 1.6.5-5, but worked up to 1.6.5-3 (explicitly checked with 1.6.2): Have you explicitly checked with 1.6.5-3 ? Checking with 1.6.2 does not mean it worked up to 1.6.5-3. I am using ant daily and upgraded almost daily, with the apt-listchanges functionality, so I remember seeing the change message and the upgrade happening. But you are right, I did not check with 1.6.5-3 _after_ I discovered the bug in 1.6.5-4, because 1.6.5-3 was not available on any mirrors. [...] Maybe ecj produces for this special case wrong bytecode. This needs to be investigated. I will rebuild with jikes to see what happens. Thanks! Cheers, Akos -- FROHNER Ákos/GD/IT/CERN -- http://cern.ch/egee-jra1-dm/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Processed: Adapting forwarding urls to new kaffe bugzilla
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forwarded 255418 http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16 Bug#255418: kaffe: Error when directory containing the class has special characters Forwarded-to-address changed from kaffe@kaffe.org to http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16. forwarded 345013 http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11 Bug#345013: kaffe: buggy java.util.zip implementation Forwarded-to-address changed from kaffe@kaffe.org to http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11. forwarded 328760 http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14 Bug#328760: FastTreeMap.fullCollection.version1.obj ObjectInputStream error Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14. forwarded 304927 http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12 Bug#304927: Kaffe: javah missing -force option Forwarded-to-address changed from kaffe@kaffe.org to http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12. forwarded 338938 http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15 Bug#338938: kaffe: LANG environement variable doesn't set default charset Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15. forwarded 335622 http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13 Bug#335622: kaffe shows error during jmp shutdown on ppc Forwarded-to-address changed from kaffe@kaffe.org to http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Re: [pylucene-dev] Re: PyLucence Debian Package
Jeff Breidenbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Given Andi's comments, one possibility is to put the PyLucene package into Debian, but under the contrib section and marking it with appropriate bug entries. The hope would be people could improve the build situation over time. Personally, I'm fine with it going into contrib. I'd like it to go into main but that's probably not feasible unless there's a DFSG-free JDK that could compile it. Another possibility - maybe - is to package an older version of PyLucene that depends on Java Lucene 1.4.3. However, I suspect there are likely to be similar issues and an upatched Java Lucene 1.4.3 will not be a viable build dependency either. Andi, correct me if I am wrong, but I believe PyLucene has always required patches to Lucene's source code. This is the impression I get from the README: http://svn.osafoundation.org/pylucene/trunk/README A third possibility is to simply wait and hope the situation gets better. Since both Java Lucene 1.9 and PyLucene have an rc in their version numbers, this is not a completely crazy idea. On the other hand, it may be a really long wait. We could wait until Lucene 1.9 is official, that'd be fine. However, I don't expect that will change things much since it's my understanding that the issues are mostly with GCJ. Is that right Andi? Andi would know better if waiting for GCJ to mature is a good idea. In Sept. 2004 Andi seemed to be mildly optimistic that gcj 3.5.0 would eliminate the need for patches. See the bottom half of: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=256283#msg25 However, that doesn't seem to have panned out. See this email: http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/pylucene-dev/2006-February/000815.html (I'm assuming here gcc 3.5 is more or less the same as gcc 4.0). A fourth possibility is to modify the Debian PyLucene package such that it first builds the patched Java Lucene .jar from .java files. That's kind of messy, and redundant, but may not have any blockers. Let me see if I have this suggestion right. The pylucene source package would include a patched fork of the Lucene code. Those sources get compiled with Java Lucene's Ant build using a regular 1.4.2 JDK. This produces a .class file that we then compile with GCJ. If that's right then that sounds fine to me. However, if I understand Debian Policy right, that'd would almost certainly mean it'd have to go in contrib. Which, as I said, is fine with me. ... So I'm a little vague on where to go from here. In my opinion your fourth option is the best. If you think it's wise, I could back off and package the PyLucene 1.0.1 tree which is based on the Lucene 1.4.3 sources. That'd side-step the fact that 1.9 is still a release candidate. What do you say? Thanks for taking time to look over the package and give your comments! -matthew ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Re: [pylucene-dev] Re: PyLucence Debian Package
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Matthew O'Connor wrote: Personally, I'm fine with it going into contrib. I'd like it to go into main but that's probably not feasible unless there's a DFSG-free JDK that could compile it. If Java Lucene exists as a Debian package already, then this problem must have been solved there. The Ant/JDK build of Java Lucene in PyLucene is just a regular Java Lucene build using their build procedures, except that some of the .java source files are patched first. Andi, correct me if I am wrong, but I believe PyLucene has always required patches to Lucene's source code. This is the impression I get from the README: Yes, this is correct. The situation is better now than it has been in the past as some of the patches were included into the Java Lucene sources but the remaining ones have no place in the Java Lucene sources and as long as gcj is bleeding edge, such patches are bound to come and go... We could wait until Lucene 1.9 is official, that'd be fine. However, I don't expect that will change things much since it's my understanding that the issues are mostly with GCJ. Is that right Andi? Correct. The current patches are not due to Java Lucene bugs but are due to gcj, gcjh and javacc bugs or issues. Andi would know better if waiting for GCJ to mature is a good idea. In Sept. 2004 Andi seemed to be mildly optimistic that gcj 3.5.0 would eliminate the need for patches. See the bottom half of: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=256283#msg25 However, that doesn't seem to have panned out. See this email: http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/pylucene-dev/2006-February/000815.html (I'm assuming here gcc 3.5 is more or less the same as gcc 4.0). I'm currently recommending gcj 3.4.x, with x = 3 for PyLucene. I've had little luck with gcj 4.x thus far. Let me see if I have this suggestion right. The pylucene source package would include a patched fork of the Lucene code. Those sources get compiled with Java Lucene's Ant build using a regular 1.4.2 JDK. This produces a .class file that we then compile with GCJ. Once there is a Debian Java Lucene 1.9 source package available, the PyLucene 1.9 package could be made to depend on it, unpack it, apply the patches, build it (and not install it) and then build itself. Seems pretty straightforward to me. So I'm a little vague on where to go from here. In my opinion your fourth option is the best. If you think it's wise, I could back off and package the PyLucene 1.0.1 tree which is based on the Lucene 1.4.3 sources. That'd side-step the fact that 1.9 is still a release candidate. What do you say? Doing this with Java Lucene 1.4.3 instead of 1.9 solves only one problem: Java Lucene 1.9 is not a release yet. The vibes I get on the Java Lucene dev list don't make me think that there is any sense of urgency in making such a release happen even though the Java Lucene 1.9 code as it stands now seems very ready for it. Andi.. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Re: [pylucene-dev] Re: PyLucence Debian Package
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: Another possibility - maybe - is to package an older version of PyLucene that depends on Java Lucene 1.4.3. However, I suspect there are likely to be similar issues and an upatched Java Lucene 1.4.3 will not be a viable build dependency either. The patching issue was worse with Java Lucene 1.4.3. Some patches were incorporated into Java Lucene 1.9 as was reasonable, improving the situation a bit but not resolving it completely. A third possibility is to simply wait and hope the situation gets better. Since both Java Lucene 1.9 and PyLucene have an rc in their version numbers, this is not a completely crazy idea. On the other hand, it may be a really long wait. Sadly, the situation is not controlled by Java Lucene or PyLucene at this point. The patches are necessary because of bugs or issues with gcj, gcjh and javacc. As you say, it could be a really long wait, the javacc bug I filed is over a year old... The real problem, though, is with gcj. Whenever the Java Lucene codebase changes in any significant manner, I have to look for 'new' gcj-related issues and patch them. When upgrading from 1.4.3 to 1.9, for example, I added the addClause() patch in QueryParser.java. A fourth possibility is to modify the Debian PyLucene package such that it first builds the patched Java Lucene .jar from .java files. That's kind of messy, and redundant, but may not have any blockers. It's a little messy as you say but this is exactly what a full build from scratch build of PyLucene entails. The steps can be summed up as follows: - svn export specific rev of Java Lucene - apply the patches - ant build Java Lucene with a Ant and a JDK - compile the .class files with gcj - compile the C++ files with g++ - run swig to generate the python bindings - compile and link all these into a python extension shared library I should add that this is a vast improvement over the PyLucene 1.0 / 1.4.3 build process which started with Lucene 1.4.3 jars, unpacked them, re-compiled some Java Lucene sources after applying patches, re-created a jar, etc.. etc... At least, the current build procedures for PyLucene 1.9 make it relatively easy to keep up with Java Lucene developments on their svn trunk. The requirement to get into Debian main is a complete build from source, using a Free Software toolchain, contolled by the Debian packaging system. Other sections of Debian relax some of these requirements. In any case, I will look over other apects of the package for possible improvements. I seems that the current PyLucene 1.9 build procedures satisfy these requirements, if one starts from the beginning as outlined in the build steps above, no ? Andi.. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
