Bug#692439: tomcat6: CVE-2012-2733 CVE-2012-3439

2012-11-06 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: tomcat6
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole

Please see http://tomcat.apache.org/security-6.html

Since Wheezy is frozen, please apply isolated security fixes and do not update
to a new upstream release.

BTW, is it really necessary to have both tomcat6 and tomcat7 in Wheezy? 
Shouldn't
tomcat6 be dropped in favour of tomcat7?

Cheers,
Moritz

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


Bug#692440: tomcat7: CVE-2012-2733 CVE-2012-3439

2012-11-06 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: tomcat7
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole

Please see http://tomcat.apache.org/security-7.html

Since Wheezy is frozen, please apply isolated security fixes instead
of updating to a new upstream release.

Cheers,
Moritz

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


Bug#692442: CVE-2012-5783: Insecure certificate validation

2012-11-06 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: commons-httpclient
Severity: important
Tags: security

Please see Section 7.5 of this paper:
http://www.cs.utexas.edu/~shmat/shmat_ccs12.pdf

This has been assigned CVE-2012-5783. I'm not sure if we can backport more
correct certificate validation to 3.x, but independent of that it might
make sense to introduce the 4.x codebase to the archive?

Cheers,
Moritz

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


Processed: Re: jspwiki does depend on tomcat6

2012-11-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

 notfound -1 2.8.0-5
Bug #656153 [jspwiki] jspwiki: postinst failure: chown: invalid user: `tomcat6'
No longer marked as found in versions jspwiki/2.8.0-5.
 fixed -1 2.8.0-5
Bug #656153 [jspwiki] jspwiki: postinst failure: chown: invalid user: `tomcat6'
Marked as fixed in versions jspwiki/2.8.0-5.
 close -1
Bug #656153 [jspwiki] jspwiki: postinst failure: chown: invalid user: `tomcat6'
Marked Bug as done

-- 
656153: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=656153
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


Bug#692455: jspwiki: modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3): /etc/jspwiki/jspwiki.properties

2012-11-06 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: jspwiki
Version: 2.8.0-5
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts

Hi,

during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies conffiles.
This is forbidden by the policy, see
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-config-files

10.7.3: [...] The easy way to achieve this behavior is to make the
configuration file a conffile. [...] This implies that the default
version will be part of the package distribution, and must not be
modified by the maintainer scripts during installation (or at any
other time).

Note that once a package ships a modified version of that conffile,
dpkg will prompt the user for an action how to handle the upgrade of
this modified conffile (that was not modified by the user).

Further in 10.7.3: [...] must not ask unnecessary questions
(particularly during upgrades) [...]

If a configuration file is customized by a maintainer script after
having asked some debconf questions, it may not be marked as a
conffile. Instead a template could be installed in /usr/share and used
by the postinst script to fill in the custom values and create (or
update) the configuration file (preserving any user modifications!).
This file must be removed during postrm purge.
ucf(1) may help with these tasks.
See also http://wiki.debian.org/DpkgConffileHandling

In https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/09/msg00412.html and
followups it has been agreed that these bugs are to be filed with
severity serious.

debsums reports modification of the following files,
from the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):

 /etc/jspwiki/jspwiki.properties
  

cheers,

Andreas


jspwiki_2.8.0-5.log.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.