Processing of tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_amd64.changes
tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5.dsc tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5.debian.tar.gz tomcat6-common_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb tomcat6-user_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb libtomcat6-java_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb libservlet2.4-java_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb libservlet2.5-java_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb libservlet2.5-java-doc_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb tomcat6-admin_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb tomcat6-examples_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb tomcat6-docs_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb tomcat6-extras_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org) __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processing of tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_amd64.changes
tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5.dsc tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5.debian.tar.gz tomcat6-common_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb tomcat6-user_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb libtomcat6-java_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb libservlet2.4-java_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb libservlet2.5-java_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb libservlet2.5-java-doc_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb tomcat6-admin_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb tomcat6-examples_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb tomcat6-docs_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb tomcat6-extras_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_amd64.changes REJECTED
Version check failed: Your upload included the source package tomcat6, version 6.0.41-2+squeeze5, however stable already has version 6.0.35-6+deb7u1. Uploads to squeeze-lts must have a lower version than present in stable. === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: tomcat6 wheezy DSA (was/and Re: tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_amd64.changes REJECTED
On Sun, 23, Nov, 2014 at 10:29:59AM +0100, Holger Levsen spoke thus.. Hi, On Sonntag, 23. November 2014, Debian FTP Masters wrote: Version check failed: Your upload included the source package tomcat6, version 6.0.41-2+squeeze5, however stable already has version 6.0.35-6+deb7u1. Uploads to squeeze-lts must have a lower version than present in stable. so this is due to the changes to dak implemented by Mark Hymers during the MiniDebConf in Cambridge early November. (Mark can you please explain what other changes (relevant to LTS) you did?! So, basically, for those following along, Holger asked me to make sure that squeeze LTS couldn't end up ahead of stable (wheezy). I therefore added the following version constraints: mhy@franck:~$ dak admin v-c list-suite squeeze-lts squeeze-lts MustBeNewerThan oldstable squeeze-lts Enhances oldstable squeeze-lts MustBeOlderThan stable squeeze-lts MustBeOlderThan proposed-updates This probably means that in some cases (especially those involving new upstream versions), stable security updates will need to hit p-u before the LTS uploads happen. If this is a problem, we should just revoke those parts of the version constraints and leave only the oldstable ones. Thanks, Mark -- Mark Hymers mhy at debian dot org Well, the thing about a black hole - it's main distinguishing feature - is it's black. And the thing about space, your basic space colour is black. So how are you supposed to see them? Holly, Red Dwarf Series III - Marooned __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Bug#768835: Bug #768835: FTBFS: Could not add file '.../JavadocFixTool.class' to ZIP
Hi, On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 04:39:23PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: Package: src:groovy2 Version: 2.2.2+dfsg-3 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Well, it FTBFS on armhf, but did it ever build on this arch? I find your justification dubious and would suggest to downgrade this bug to important, as it is clearly a architecture-dependet issue. * What went wrong: Execution failed for task ':jar'. Could not add file '/«BUILDDIR»/groovy2-2.2.2+dfsg/buildSrc/target/classes/main/JavadocFixTool.class' to ZIP '/«BUILDDIR»/groovy2-2.2.2+dfsg/buildSrc/target/libs/buildSrc.jar'. So while JavadocFixTool.class is around, the buildSrc.jar looks bad: (sid_armhf-dchroot)mbanck@asachi:~/src/groovy2-2.2.2+dfsg/buildSrc$ jar tvf target/libs/buildSrc.jar java.util.zip.ZipException: error in opening zip file at java.util.zip.ZipFile.open(Native Method) at java.util.zip.ZipFile.init(ZipFile.java:215) at java.util.zip.ZipFile.init(ZipFile.java:145) at java.util.zip.ZipFile.init(ZipFile.java:116) at sun.tools.jar.Main.list(Main.java:1004) at sun.tools.jar.Main.run(Main.java:245) at sun.tools.jar.Main.main(Main.java:1177) (sid_armhf-dchroot)mbanck@asachi:~/src/groovy2-2.2.2+dfsg/buildSrc$ ls -l target/libs/buildSrc.jar -rw-r--r-- 1 mbanck Debian 158 Nov 23 13:05 target/libs/buildSrc.jar Full log attached. One thing I noticed: Caused by: java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: No such file or directory - /«BUILDDIR»/groovy2-2.2.2+dfsg/buildSrc/target/classes/main/JavadocFixTool.class at org.gradle.internal.nativeplatform.filesystem.PosixUtil$POSIXHandlerImpl.error(PosixUtil.java:38) In this line, there's a linebreak missing for a regular exception backtrace. When I rerouted output on asachi, I found a non-printable character in the log: |[ERROR] [org.gradle.BuildExceptionReporter] Caused by: |java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: No such file or directory - |/home/mbanck/src/groovy2-2.2.2+dfsg/buildSrc/target/classes/main/JavadocFixTool.class^@ |[ERROR] [org.gradle.BuildExceptionReporter] at |org.gradle.internal.nativeplatform.filesystem.PosixUtil$POSIXHandlerImpl.error(PosixUtil.java:38) See the ^@. Maybe that is part of the problem. Michael __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processing of tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_amd64.changes
tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5.dsc tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5.debian.tar.gz tomcat6-common_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb tomcat6-user_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb libtomcat6-java_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb libservlet2.4-java_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb libservlet2.5-java_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb libservlet2.5-java-doc_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb tomcat6-admin_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb tomcat6-examples_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb tomcat6-docs_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb tomcat6-extras_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org) __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processing of tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_amd64.changes
tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5.dsc tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5.debian.tar.gz tomcat6-common_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb tomcat6-user_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb libtomcat6-java_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb libservlet2.4-java_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb libservlet2.5-java_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb libservlet2.5-java-doc_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb tomcat6-admin_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb tomcat6-examples_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb tomcat6-docs_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb tomcat6-extras_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_amd64.changes is NEW
binary:tomcat6-extras is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages are routinely processed through to the archive, and do feel free to browse the NEW queue[1]. If there is an issue with the upload, you will recieve an email from a member of the ftpteam. If you have any questions, you may reply to this email. [1]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
libapache-mod-jk 1:1.2.37-4 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the libapache-mod-jk source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1:1.2.37-3 Current version: 1:1.2.37-4 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
openjdk-7-jre-dcevm 7u60-3 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the openjdk-7-jre-dcevm source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 7u60-2 Current version: 7u60-3 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into squeeze-lts, squeeze-lts
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 20:08:38 +0100 Source: tomcat6 Binary: tomcat6-common tomcat6 tomcat6-user libtomcat6-java libservlet2.4-java libservlet2.5-java libservlet2.5-java-doc tomcat6-admin tomcat6-examples tomcat6-docs tomcat6-extras Architecture: source all Version: 6.0.41-2+squeeze5 Distribution: squeeze-lts Urgency: high Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: Holger Levsen hol...@debian.org Description: libservlet2.4-java - Transitional package for libservlet2.5-java libservlet2.5-java - Servlet 2.5 and JSP 2.1 Java API classes libservlet2.5-java-doc - Servlet 2.5 and JSP 2.1 Java API documentation libtomcat6-java - Servlet and JSP engine -- core libraries tomcat6- Servlet and JSP engine tomcat6-admin - Servlet and JSP engine -- admin web applications tomcat6-common - Servlet and JSP engine -- common files tomcat6-docs - Servlet and JSP engine -- documentation tomcat6-examples - Servlet and JSP engine -- example web applications tomcat6-extras - Servlet and JSP engine -- additional components tomcat6-user - Servlet and JSP engine -- tools to create user instances Closes: 299635 608286 654136 659748 664072 665393 666256 668761 671373 677912 682955 687818 692440 695250 713796 717279 Changes: tomcat6 (6.0.41-2+squeeze5) squeeze-lts; urgency=medium . * Security upload by the Debian LTS team. * The full list of changes between 6.0.35 (the version previously available in squeeze) and 6.0.41 can be see in the upstream changelog, which is available online at http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/changelog.html * This update fixes the following security issues: - CVE-2014-0033: prevent remote attackers from conducting session fixation attacks via crafted URLs. - CVE-2013-4590: prevent Tomcat internals information leaks. - CVE-2013-4322: prevent remote attackers from doing denial of service attacks. - CVE-2013-4286: reject requests with multiple content-length headers or with a content-length header when chunked encoding is being used. - Avoid CVE-2013-1571 when generating Javadoc. - CVE-2012-3439: various improvements to the DIGEST authenticator. * Thanks to Tony Mancill for doing the vast amount of the work for this update! * Downgrade debian/compat to 8 and reduce build-dependency do debhelper 8 to match the squeeze squeeze version . tomcat6 (6.0.41-2) unstable; urgency=medium . [ Emmanuel Bourg ] * Updated the version required for libtcnative-1 (= 1.1.30) . [ tony mancill ] * Add patch for logfile compression. (Closes: #682955) - Thank you to Thijs Kinkhorst. . tomcat6 (6.0.41-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream release. - Refreshed the patches . tomcat6 (6.0.39-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Team upload. * New upstream release. - Refreshed the patches * Standards-Version updated to 3.9.5 (no changes) * Switch to debhelper level 9 * Use XZ compression for the upstream tarball * Use canonical URL for the Vcs-Git field . tomcat6 (6.0.37-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release. - Drop patches for CVE-2012-4534, CVE-2012-4431, CVE-2012-3546, CVE-2012-2733, CVE-2012-3439 - Drop 0011-CVE-02012-0022-regression-fix.patch - Drop 0017-eclipse-compiler-update.patch * Freshened remaining patches. . tomcat6 (6.0.35-7) unstable; urgency=low . * Team upload. * Fixed the watch file * Fix FTBFS with ecj 3.8 (closes: #717279, #713796) * Updated the standards version to 3.9.4 - no changes * Updated the Vcs-Git field to the canonical url . tomcat6 (6.0.35-6) unstable; urgency=high . * Acknowledge NMU: 6.0.35-5+nmu1 (Closes: #692440) - Thank you to Michael Gilbert. * Add patches for the following security issues: (Closes: #695250) - CVE-2012-4534, CVE-2012-4431, CVE-2012-3546 . tomcat6 (6.0.35-5+nmu1) unstable; urgency=high . * Non-maintainer upload. * Fix multiple security issues (closes: #692440) - cve-2012-2733: denial-of-service by triggering out of memory error. - cve-2012-3439: multiple replay attack issues in digest authentication. . tomcat6 (6.0.35-5) unstable; urgency=low . * Apply patch to README.Debian to explain setting the HTTPOnly flag in cookies by default; CVE-2010-4312. (Closes: #608286) - Thank you to Thijs Kinkhorst for the patch. * Use ucf and a template for /etc/logrotate.d/tomcat6 file to avoid updating the shipped conffile. (Closes: #687818) . tomcat6 (6.0.35-4) unstable; urgency=low . [ tony mancill ] * Team upload. * Apply patch from James Page (Closes: #671373) - d/tomcat6-instance-create: Quote access to files and directories so that spaces can be used when creating user instances. - d/tomcat6.init: Make NAME dynamic, to allow starting multiple
Processing of java3d_1.5.2+dfsg-11_amd64.changes
java3d_1.5.2+dfsg-11_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: java3d_1.5.2+dfsg-11.dsc java3d_1.5.2+dfsg-11.debian.tar.xz libjava3d-java_1.5.2+dfsg-11_all.deb libjava3d-java-doc_1.5.2+dfsg-11_all.deb libjava3d-jni_1.5.2+dfsg-11_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
java3d_1.5.2+dfsg-11_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 09:09:20 -0800 Source: java3d Binary: libjava3d-java libjava3d-jni libjava3d-java-doc Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 1.5.2+dfsg-11 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: tony mancill tmanc...@debian.org Description: libjava3d-java - Java 3D API (java library) libjava3d-java-doc - Documentation for the Java3D API libjava3d-jni - Java3D API (java jni library) Changes: java3d (1.5.2+dfsg-11) unstable; urgency=medium . * Team upload. * Revert debian/compat to debhelper 7 to allow the package to be compatible with the Jessie release policy for unblock requests. Checksums-Sha1: 06556f88a7fab9bff3ee761284b08db601a090c1 2243 java3d_1.5.2+dfsg-11.dsc ab1f236dd4029de217e03dab03c39110b195df01 10272 java3d_1.5.2+dfsg-11.debian.tar.xz 02e39434485da978b0c17e1ece5393fb25c377b4 1084562 libjava3d-java_1.5.2+dfsg-11_all.deb 0e8ac0297fc1f721bfdeac092d9462be892ce6f7 877764 libjava3d-java-doc_1.5.2+dfsg-11_all.deb 095118f2601b550144a84eec754c7362489a3716 44032 libjava3d-jni_1.5.2+dfsg-11_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: 040f74949f87eb1526ef5dbadc4bb72b850f45eeb4d41d503b44ddc188ac5922 2243 java3d_1.5.2+dfsg-11.dsc 15f8122ea867fe79374a2e688528eda0cda1d6de0e053b2f21df20c2aed6127e 10272 java3d_1.5.2+dfsg-11.debian.tar.xz 896b3c68a0828504e36585571d0016c044bf84e3e5c5f0af96bb81a86411f4a6 1084562 libjava3d-java_1.5.2+dfsg-11_all.deb a91f23c0c36243b57a0805a561ed2d41402fd3345eca1bbe509c20d20e203a2b 877764 libjava3d-java-doc_1.5.2+dfsg-11_all.deb 2a72f08934ec362aa0401eee5e201b3013b5ba073d93cd32ee9b728422625738 44032 libjava3d-jni_1.5.2+dfsg-11_amd64.deb Files: 99062bcbbca53a64c082224421812ccd 2243 java optional java3d_1.5.2+dfsg-11.dsc 3f43f0735c641f45ffbb7a7df0e23693 10272 java optional java3d_1.5.2+dfsg-11.debian.tar.xz 611fe74eece678c1e72cd5da3daf4369 1084562 java optional libjava3d-java_1.5.2+dfsg-11_all.deb 0140b70546cd9ec470a486032e47e38e 877764 doc optional libjava3d-java-doc_1.5.2+dfsg-11_all.deb c9f2f5474b95e2fa9f00d792f59bb112 44032 java optional libjava3d-jni_1.5.2+dfsg-11_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUcha/AAoJECHSBYmXSz6W4vQQANz7zqUOXLwVEkcoIyB+6UZv uZZIoZI7B5YkktWIqo8ESbh2gLkXZZKgkK1IBArVSW2OLmzFFIZXksK0juvB23Th x0Etiusj5i2vCFQ/lwiQ3uNR0F2AhKGM11eRd+i7RPunUn8RoGAURvQUyyBt3jD2 zAE0fvUb5YcYXMa2UuuFTfySQyqWmme94w89Q2KFR0XLo773IAro4fZ+SijFuqKK XFygXr4zdSDsc2r1VeAx1JVyIsqy3qmq1tVFyYylsVrvbMIB/dm7k2/DBFg38P7A 1mhbwxzzgoeLN5gFUW9j/jUdAIO4afvb8PokSBmjDyDhblUxrMvzX8ozsFqjFoGy HV35W3vd09XvjGD3gRdYb5w/1HA0cMxZN0xvlP1gZ5s84XD9NFaK+zho04+kyOHC 9oq38vfMfY7ZbMS8NrsfNoqTorR2qc5g1No+SvVAzf1olYKviHCjZL3bYqeOZDTa NjZzHYPwrFfsh3r73FURZ//utfhMIq/oT3Ln6lTVd1oPrMMZ9GXxxGyD7mbOTnrw H2fmdl5qmR5+VpxVadzdzNlsCP8sC5qH0H6pFoHxXHNmW4IlTcAmjg9Td8g8HDTt 0Fxb+eZZYb1qAdR7EGPE3DFdvF6oMKFMqkCV9uAiRa3tcRJBGx8JKjnwD9xzb8uu oX7D4oLLK2XCFjF/Qjaf =k9uS -END PGP SIGNATURE- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processing of robocode_1.9.2.4-1_amd64.changes
robocode_1.9.2.4-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: robocode_1.9.2.4-1.dsc robocode_1.9.2.4.orig.tar.gz robocode_1.9.2.4-1.debian.tar.xz robocode_1.9.2.4-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org) __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processing of robocode_1.9.2.4-1_amd64.changes
robocode_1.9.2.4-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: robocode_1.9.2.4-1.dsc robocode_1.9.2.4.orig.tar.gz robocode_1.9.2.4-1.debian.tar.xz robocode_1.9.2.4-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
robocode_1.9.2.4-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 18:38:32 +0100
Source: robocode
Binary: robocode
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.9.2.4-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Markus Koschany a...@gambaru.de
Description:
robocode - Java programming game based on battle tanks
Closes: 551877
Changes:
robocode (1.9.2.4-1) experimental; urgency=medium
.
* Imported Upstream version 1.9.2.4. (Closes: #551877) (LP: #377376)
- Fix compilation errors by using the default-jdk. (LP: #1384691)
* New build system: Maven
- Switch to CDBS and maven-debian-helper.
- New files:
+ maven.ignoreRules
+ maven.properties
+ maven.rules
+ clean
+ robocode.poms
* debian/control:
- New build-dependencies:
junit4, junit4-doc, libcodesize-java, libecj-java,
libmaven-assembly-plugin-java, libmaven-dependency-plugin-java,
libmaven-javadoc-plugin-java, libpicocontainer-java,
libpicocontainer-java-doc
- robocode: Add ${maven:Depends} substvar.
- robocode: Recommend default-jdk-doc.
- Drop robocode-doc. All documentation will be provided by robocode itself.
* Drop debian/codesize. Codesize is now packaged as a standalone library.
* Drop all patches because they are all obsolete:
- 01-use-sensible-browser.diff
- 02-use-versions.txt-from-usr-share-doc.diff
- 03-point-api-help-to-robocode-doc.diff
- 04-link-to-local-docs.diff
- 05-codesize-jar.diff
- 06-update-manager.diff
* Add the following patches:
- ecj.patch: For preventing a FTBFS. Use Debian's version of the ecj
compiler. Please note that libecj-java is only needed to compile Robocode
successfully but that Debian uses the default-jdk compiler instead.
- showJavaDocumentation.patch: Users should use Debian's local
default-jdk-doc.
* Install roborumble example script with robocode.examples file to
/usr/share/doc/robocode/examples. Please use this script as a template for
running the Robocode competitions on your computer.
* Update robocode wrapper script. Use XDG_DATA_HOME as the personal data
directory for Robocode. All user data will be installed to
~/.local/share/robocode/$VER where $VER is the current upstream version.
* Update debian/watch and detect new upstream releases at github.com.
* Update get-orig-source target. The sources are pristine now.
* Update debian/copyright for new release. Robocode is licensed under the
EPL-1.0 now.
* Update man page of Robocode for new release.
* Drop README.source.
Checksums-Sha1:
ee86007cd891d821eacb37a83822b025df6a93e2 2339 robocode_1.9.2.4-1.dsc
843e5772e4ea1a2dd78aa3b1a9f84a73f9788796 2169590 robocode_1.9.2.4.orig.tar.gz
41a1ccd8a2407d8402ecc6b2ff2a7a618988924c 12448 robocode_1.9.2.4-1.debian.tar.xz
184e0c2982c471b57a95dec3e60b7523b6ebd797 2635058 robocode_1.9.2.4-1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
ca288c169f8fb294b08c7bc98fe42861eed653a0af04516149a182f363fa 2339
robocode_1.9.2.4-1.dsc
ce26f30164072ac3550a02d31c96878e88dadc1c71763c11de31b0c569ebe714 2169590
robocode_1.9.2.4.orig.tar.gz
816e3675fc780264b705ec8e772e68909218baa55a519f57ff2775189bcbc036 12448
robocode_1.9.2.4-1.debian.tar.xz
dac5175dc4d1706d41b87b9d264c641748328818b4106fe682d5758443e13df8 2635058
robocode_1.9.2.4-1_all.deb
Files:
7112b962d37fa694774502a0764d2472 2339 games optional robocode_1.9.2.4-1.dsc
ba9f611133bd75d210268590fe504f5b 2169590 games optional
robocode_1.9.2.4.orig.tar.gz
84de853c8bb6c479a3c7a67d51d7306e 12448 games optional
robocode_1.9.2.4-1.debian.tar.xz
8efc24b31ce35162082cc6ba7fa47d8b 2635058 games optional
robocode_1.9.2.4-1_all.deb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1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=PdxD
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers.
Please use
Bug#551877: marked as done (robocode: New upstream version available)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Nov 2014 18:33:53 + with message-id e1xsbyr-0004j3...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#551877: fixed in robocode 1.9.2.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #551877, regarding robocode: New upstream version available to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 551877: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=551877 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: robocode Version: 1.6.2+dfsg-2 Severity: wishlist The latest upstream version of Robocode is 1.7.1.4. A lot of bugs has been fixed since 1.6.2 and few features has been added. I am attaching versions.txt file from the latest version. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (60, 'unstable'), (50, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-2-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages robocode depends on: ii libbcel-java 5.2-6 Analyze, create, and manipulate (b ii sun-java6-jre [java2-runtime] 6-16-1 Sun Java(TM) Runtime Environment ( Versions of packages robocode recommends: ii sun-java6-jdk [java2-compiler 6-16-1 Sun Java(TM) Development Kit (JDK) Versions of packages robocode suggests: ii robocode-doc1.6.2+dfsg-2 Java programming game based on bat -- no debconf information Version 1.7.1.4 (25-Sep-2009) --- = Bugfixes = * Bug [2845608] - java.io.FileNotFoundException in RobotFileSystemManager.init * Bug [2845612] - Can't load Katana 1.0 or DrussGT 1.3.1wilo * Bug [2854692] - Lockup on start if too many bots in robots dir * Bug [2852860] - IllegalArgumentException on painting in some robots * Fixed NullPointerException that could occur with the -battle command-line option = Changes = == Banning == * The previous 1.7.x.x versions have been very strict so that robots that could not be loaded, started, skipped too many turns etc. would be disallowed to participate in battles. With the bugfix for bug [2845612] above this policy has been changed so robots are only banned if the cause a security violation or they could not be loaded or started (meaning that they are not able to run). In addition, ALL security violations are always written out in both the main console and robot's console. A message will be written out in the main console like xxx has caused a security violation. This robot has been banned and will not be allowed to participate in battles. == Painting == * With the bugfix for bug [2852860] a change was made so a robot will now receive this message in its console window, if it is painting too much between actions: SYSTEM: This robot is painting too much between actions. Max. capacity has been reached. * Notice that a robot is not allowed to perform an unlimited amount of paint operations for two reasons: 1) It takes up a lot of memory as the painting operations are recorded in a buffer before being processed, and potentially this buffer must be recorded to a file (for replays). A robot is allowed to use up to a maximum of 64 KB per action. An average painting operation like e.g. fillRect(x, y, width, height) takes up 15 bytes, meaning that more 4000 painting operations should be possible, which is a lot. 2) It takes a lot of CPU cycles to process the painting buffer to the display making the painting slow if the buffer is too large. * It is possible to remove the limit of the robots painting buffer by using the command-line option: -Ddebug=true Version 1.7.1.4 Beta (26-Aug-2009) --- This version is dedicated for the RoboRumble@Home community where many issues seen with the RoboRumble client have been solved. Thank you all for reporting as many known issues as possible, and also help out solving these - especially with the issue seen with the robot movement that had a big impact on the scores and rankings! :-) A big thanks goes to Patrick Cupka (Voidious), Julian Kent (Skilgannon), Positive and Nat Pavasant (Nat) for their combined work with developing and testing the new and improved robot movement regarding acceleration and deceleration rules (Bug [2828072]). :-) = Bugfixes = * Bug [2828072] - Accel/decel rules introduced in 1.7.1.3 causes trouble. * Bug [2828479] - Missed onRobotDeath events. * Bug [2819387] - Team jar files reported as corrupted. * Bug [2809518] - Does not extract .properties files into bot data dir. This fix did not work properly
Re: tomcat6 wheezy DSA (was/and Re: tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_amd64.changes REJECTED
On 11/23/2014 04:16 AM, Mark Hymers wrote: On Sun, 23, Nov, 2014 at 10:29:59AM +0100, Holger Levsen spoke thus.. Hi, On Sonntag, 23. November 2014, Debian FTP Masters wrote: Version check failed: Your upload included the source package tomcat6, version 6.0.41-2+squeeze5, however stable already has version 6.0.35-6+deb7u1. Uploads to squeeze-lts must have a lower version than present in stable. so this is due to the changes to dak implemented by Mark Hymers during the MiniDebConf in Cambridge early November. (Mark can you please explain what other changes (relevant to LTS) you did?! So, basically, for those following along, Holger asked me to make sure that squeeze LTS couldn't end up ahead of stable (wheezy). I therefore added the following version constraints: mhy@franck:~$ dak admin v-c list-suite squeeze-lts squeeze-lts MustBeNewerThan oldstable squeeze-lts Enhances oldstable squeeze-lts MustBeOlderThan stable squeeze-lts MustBeOlderThan proposed-updates This probably means that in some cases (especially those involving new upstream versions), stable security updates will need to hit p-u before the LTS uploads happen. If this is a problem, we should just revoke those parts of the version constraints and leave only the oldstable ones. Hi Holger, Thank you for coordinating this effort. I'm not aware of any reason why the squeeze-lts packaging/version of tomcat6 wouldn't also be appropriate for wheezy. An updated tomcat-native package should also be part of the update; building 1.1.31-1 from testing/unstable on wheezy fine. (I just built both of these, the squeeze-lts tomcat6 + tomcat-native 1.1.31-1 on a wheezy chroot and ran them without any issue.) The Java Team is cc:d on this thread. Emmanuel has been in much closer contact with tomcat6 since this effort started, so he may have some input. Synopsis: Updating tomcat6 for squeeze-lts put us in the awkward position of having a newer tomcat in old-stable than in stable; Holger is helping to get this resolved. I am recommending that tomcat-native 1.1.31 accompany any updates to tomcat6 6.0.41. Cheers, tony signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Bug#770744: javamail: FTBFS under pbuilder with USENETWORK=no: Test failure
Source: javamail Version: 1.5.2-3 Severity: important From my pbuilder build log (on amd64): ... --- T E S T S --- Running MimeMultipartParseTest Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 4.207 sec Running javax.mail.internet.GetLocalAddressTest Tests run: 7, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.006 sec Running javax.mail.internet.InternetAddressTest Tests run: 183, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.132 sec Running javax.mail.internet.MimeMessageTest Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0 sec Running javax.mail.internet.MimeMultipartPropertyTest Tests run: 10, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.003 sec Running javax.mail.internet.NewsAddressTest Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.001 sec Running javax.mail.internet.MimeMultipartPreambleTest Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.003 sec Running javax.mail.internet.AddFromTest Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.002 sec Running javax.mail.internet.MimeMessageTestSuite AllowEncodedMessages Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.059 sec Running javax.mail.internet.AddAddressHeaderTest Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.002 sec Running javax.mail.internet.NonAsciiBoundaryTest Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.002 sec Running javax.mail.internet.FoldTest Tests run: 39, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.034 sec Running javax.mail.internet.search.SearchTermSerializationTest Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.05 sec Running javax.mail.internet.ParameterListTestSuite ParameterListTests WindowsFileNames AppleFileNames DecodeParameters ParametersNoStrict Tests run: 5, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.065 sec Running javax.mail.internet.ContentTypeTest Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.001 sec Running javax.mail.internet.ReferencesTest Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.003 sec Running javax.mail.internet.MimeUtilityTest Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.021 sec Running javax.mail.internet.ModifyMessageTest Tests run: 5, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.007 sec Running javax.mail.internet.MimeBodyPartTest Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.006 sec Running javax.mail.internet.HeaderTokenizerTest Tests run: 56, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.051 sec Running javax.mail.internet.RestrictEncodingTest Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.005 sec Running javax.mail.URLNameTest Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.026 sec Running com.sun.mail.imap.IMAPSaslLoginTest Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.085 sec Running com.sun.mail.imap.IMAPLoginFailureTest Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.005 sec Running com.sun.mail.imap.IMAPCloseFailureTest Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.261 sec Running com.sun.mail.imap.MessageCacheTest Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.002 sec Running com.sun.mail.imap.IMAPAlertTest Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.041 sec Running com.sun.mail.imap.IMAPConnectFailureTest Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0 sec Running com.sun.mail.imap.protocol.IMAPProtocolTest Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.003 sec Running com.sun.mail.imap.protocol.StratoImapBugfixTest Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0 sec Running com.sun.mail.imap.protocol.UIDSetTest Tests run: 13, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.007 sec Running com.sun.mail.imap.protocol.EnvelopeTest Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0 sec Running com.sun.mail.imap.IMAPAuthDebugTest Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 3.018 sec Running com.sun.mail.imap.IMAPIdleUntaggedResponseTest Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 1, Time elapsed: 0 sec Running com.sun.mail.imap.IMAPIdleStateTest Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.026 sec Running com.sun.mail.util.UUDecoderStreamTest Tests run: 17, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.011 sec Running com.sun.mail.util.PropUtilTest Tests run: 19, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.027 sec Running com.sun.mail.util.MimeUtilTestSuite ContentTypeCleaner Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.052 sec Running com.sun.mail.util.LineInputStreamTest Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0,
Re: tomcat6 wheezy DSA (was/and Re: tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_amd64.changes REJECTED
On 11/23/2014 12:03 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: Hi Adam, On Sonntag, 23. November 2014, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2014-11-23 at 19:43 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: oh, btw: jessie has -2, sid -3, with changes unsuitable for wheezy and targeted at jessie. this needs an unblock request to let -3 migrate to jessie and have the binaries removed from sid first... anybody doing this? It needs more than that; from the cruft-report: that's the cruft report for which distro? * package libtomcat6-java in version 6.0.41-2 is no longer built from source [...] - broken Depends: tomcat-maven-plugin: libtomcat-maven-plugin-java both are in wheezy * package tomcat6 in version 6.0.41-2 is no longer built from source [...] - broken Depends: biomaj-watcher/contrib: biomaj-watcher guacamole-client: guacamole-tomcat both are in wheezy jspwiki/contrib: jspwiki jspwiki I can only find in unstable... - broken Build-Depends: jspwiki/contrib: tomcat6 * package tomcat6-common in version 6.0.41-2 is no longer built from source [... - broken Build-Depends: tomcat-maven-plugin: tomcat6-common see above, in wheezy /me cannot believe adsb might have done a mistake - have we been hacked? ;-) The cruft report for unstable will look *very* different due to 6.0.41-3 being a *radically* different package. tomcat6 (6.0.41-3) unstable; urgency=medium * Build only the libservlet2.5-java and libservlet2.5-java-doc packages. Tomcat 6 will not be supported in Jessie, but the Servlet API is still useful as a build dependency for other packages. * Standards-Version updated to 3.9.6 (no changes) -- Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org Wed, 22 Oct 2014 09:48:54 +0200 The decision/requirement to remove tomcat6 from jessie has been requested by the Security team for quite a while, and the 6.0.41-3 source upload effectively does this by just building libservlet2.5-java (without which we would have many packages with missing r-deps). I not sure I understand all of the ramifications of the statement I'm about to make, but for the purposes of squeeze and wheezy, we need to consider 6.0.41-2 as the last version of a complete tomcat6 source package. tony signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Bug#770744: javamail: FTBFS under pbuilder with USENETWORK=no: Test failure
On 11/23/2014 11:02 AM, Daniel Schepler wrote: Source: javamail Version: 1.5.2-3 Severity: important [snip] Failed tests: test(com.sun.mail.smtp.SMTPWriteTimeoutTest): No exception I have mixed feelings about these sorts of failures. I understand the need to build in a non-networked environment, but it is also unrealistic to expect that networking software not contain unit tests that exercise networking. Disabling such tests is potentially a disservice to our users; we're no longer testing as much as we could during a build. I think eventually we're going to have to have a better way to differentiate between what a package needs during its build phase vs. its test phase, but that's a discussion for after the jessie release. Emmanuel, any concerns with an upload to disable this test? BTW, there's a good (and expansive) thread on a related topic here: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=753944 Thank you, tony signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: tomcat6 wheezy DSA (was/and Re: tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_amd64.changes REJECTED
On 11/23/2014 01:16 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: Hi Tony, On Sonntag, 23. November 2014, tony mancill wrote: The cruft report for unstable will look *very* different due to 6.0.41-3 being a *radically* different package. no, the report exactly looks like this *because* of this: * Build only the libservlet2.5-java and libservlet2.5-java-doc packages. [..] The decision/requirement to remove tomcat6 from jessie has been requested by the Security team for quite a while, and the 6.0.41-3 source upload effectively does this by just building libservlet2.5-java (without which we would have many packages with missing r-deps). what's missing now is a bug against ftp.debian.org asking for the removal of the binaries from sid, which are not build by the -3 anymore. RM/NBS bug filed, #770769. *then*, -3 can migrate to jessie and those binaries will vanish automagically. and the stuff in the cruft report breaks because of this. I not sure I understand all of the ramifications of the statement I'm about to make, but for the purposes of squeeze and wheezy, we need to consider 6.0.41-2 as the last version of a complete tomcat6 source package. yup, I will base the wheezy upload on this. Thank you! tony signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: tomcat6 wheezy DSA (was/and Re: tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_amd64.changes REJECTED
Le 23/11/2014 22:09, tony mancill a écrit : The decision/requirement to remove tomcat6 from jessie has been requested by the Security team for quite a while, and the 6.0.41-3 source upload effectively does this by just building libservlet2.5-java (without which we would have many packages with missing r-deps). I not sure I understand all of the ramifications of the statement I'm about to make, but for the purposes of squeeze and wheezy, we need to consider 6.0.41-2 as the last version of a complete tomcat6 source package. Would that help if we rename the source package in unstable/testing to libservlet2.5-java? Emmanuel Bourg __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Bug#770744: javamail: FTBFS under pbuilder with USENETWORK=no: Test failure
Le 23/11/2014 22:20, tony mancill a écrit : Emmanuel, any concerns with an upload to disable this test? I share the same feelings and I think this kind of failure should be ignored. My only concern is that we weaken the test coverage and I tend to dislike that, but if hitting a DNS server is a severe policy violation then let's upload a new version. Emmanuel Bourg __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: eclipse-rcp: debian/rules build-arch does not install some files in eclipse-rcp
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: owner 770457 ! Bug #770457 [eclipse-rcp] eclipse-rcp: debian/rules build-arch does not install some files in eclipse-rcp Owner recorded as Markus Koschany a...@gambaru.de. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 770457: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=770457 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Bug#770457: eclipse-rcp: debian/rules build-arch does not install some files in eclipse-rcp
owner 770457 ! thanks On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 12:56:31 + James Cowgill james.cowg...@imgtec.com wrote: Package: eclipse-rcp Version: 3.8.1-5.1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 4.9 Control: block 769248 by -1 Hi, When building eclipse using dpkg-buildpackage -B, some files in the eclipse-rcp package are not installed. You can see this by comparing the list of files installed on amd64 vs i386: https://packages.debian.org/jessie/amd64/eclipse-rcp/filelist https://packages.debian.org/jessie/i386/eclipse-rcp/filelist Specifically the lack of /usr/share/java/org.eclipse.jface.jar on i386 causes androidsdk-tools to FTBFS. Looking at debian/rules, the org.eclipse.jface part near the bottom needs to be moved from the arch-independent section to the arch-dependent section. The dh_install override seems to be wrong indeed. It should read override_dh_install-indep: instead of override_dh_install_indep: I'm currently building the package for i386. I think we should add another override_dh_install-arch target and override_jh_classpath target and tidy up debian/rules a little. I'll report back as soon as it's done. Markus signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Bug#770441: androidsdk-tools: Vcs-* fields do not point to a valid repository
On 11/21/2014 01:35 AM, James Cowgill wrote: Source: androidsdk-tools Version: 22.2+git20130830~92d25d6-1 Severity: minor Hi, Currently the Vcs fields of this package point to: git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-java/androidsdk-tools.git http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-java/androidsdk-tools.git;a=summary but these pages don't exist, I just get an error when visiting them. Hi James, That's strange - thank you for pointing this out. I have pushed the copy of the repo I had locally (from looking at this package for sponsoring in summer of 2013) and used git-import-dsc to pull in the current version in testing/unstable. This should make it easier to work on the FTBFS bug. Jakub or Stephan, if you have a better/more complete copy of the repo, please scratch what's in /git/pkg-java/androidsdk-tools.git and push your repo. The link is currently still broken, but I think we're just waiting for a cronjob to run on alioth. Once it's there, I'll close the bug. Cheers, tony signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processing of remotetea_1.0.7-3_amd64.changes
remotetea_1.0.7-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: remotetea_1.0.7-3.dsc remotetea_1.0.7-3.debian.tar.xz remotetea_1.0.7-3_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
remotetea_1.0.7-3_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:38:35 +0100 Source: remotetea Binary: remotetea Architecture: source all Version: 1.0.7-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org Description: remotetea - Sun ONC/RPC support for Java Closes: 770595 Changes: remotetea (1.0.7-3) unstable; urgency=medium . * Package adopted by the Java Team (Closes: #770595) * Install the Maven artifacts for org.acplt:oncrpc * Changed the package priority to optional Checksums-Sha1: 3b925f43fc19507866b84a61d9dd56d937e3092f 1958 remotetea_1.0.7-3.dsc 416b6e63278605a022a3eceb0edc1bd550523be7 6076 remotetea_1.0.7-3.debian.tar.xz 774c51b5f1b8c145e9d235764ac4ed943c26dd2c 309388 remotetea_1.0.7-3_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 05bed87a2e883ec93856e01630ef357382ee3691e8a48893630953428dcfd5a0 1958 remotetea_1.0.7-3.dsc 8e414597224dfcbf9069a69ad152384145095fdaedde08edb254de641b5c6cb3 6076 remotetea_1.0.7-3.debian.tar.xz 3cc8e3b1fcb215b348aa5c1c8dc70f9759b744c757f1c63c72853ef1ae2db4d3 309388 remotetea_1.0.7-3_all.deb Files: a74f410967874151064888d8e30b2669 1958 java optional remotetea_1.0.7-3.dsc db951d5606ae7b5b7fde7567678ff147 6076 java optional remotetea_1.0.7-3.debian.tar.xz 0821a91c2e135a024f8dfec758cf74a0 309388 java optional remotetea_1.0.7-3_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUcnvXAAoJEPUTxBnkudCs8PgQAK563AU3J/jsArEDRa1WGIy8 bdzj0juXT3G+vTr3PBjHI78BH9sIU2MLncWDEk2elCdXl9QQtWOm9VYTyXFy7VLm C//zR/00v3TsU/+hl+7+I6fr3S9/H9CusBXyt614mX/DQr5ObOof8On7wsV15lm6 ryCl1q73UXj2mkRDz+f9U1CsO2XhclvLoP5YymhCARfg+IwBHxzxv2YJrPafod7N BDjdSe6SbIYXhxsOzGs/8YRFNO/YaLQYG6I1Jk8PqPqJzhzVm/vwaHPIrK8npKWz D6nD5c511OlY6nw97lYJJlduNfTUkPF7r6eQenktBnom6URrKVWJ1bRUEAk9SKQK 7YW+ZPT5/nw/B3igXWlMEUIPifObkBzTv/7zxBM05P6Xs9Q1J75oSFrWyIIl3/iP i2e8yzb/cvsB30Bj/I+d7C6C952G4kY8zbli/wJOQheK5JgAdFcbFvl1O9efBx44 PBSWV1YWnli8UCog1p4X5iJzvaCoCTdRb2f2uLAEgKzzwkLgtydEkOXLBiJNUz83 j7k3CTape/RN4bVjGQV1cOgZKZ/7nOUrEZTqjcJv6Dgb+LUAufj2m25JI1s4dl6p g7JBE2XGspA/oQsctd+b49maTWONqAK4JoeH7wX7GmyLJeKJ3itInwcGAlBHEIIA cGPkV52CTEl+5kHPZOm+ =QnEt -END PGP SIGNATURE- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Bug#770780: Apache ActiveMQ Packaged with Old XStream Library
Package: activemq Version: 5.6.0+dfsg-1 Apache ActiveMQ as packaged for Debian seems to ship with an old XStream (1.4.2) library[1][2] which allows for instantiating arbitrary classes. This could be leveraged for system command execution as demonstrated against versions before 1.4.7. # dpkg -S /usr/share/activemq/lib/optional/xstream.jar activemq: /usr/share/activemq/lib/optional/xstream.jar # # dpkg -s activemq Package: activemq Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: java Installed-Size: 217 Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Architecture: all Version: 5.6.0+dfsg-1 Depends: adduser (= 3.11), libactivemq-java (= 5.6.0+dfsg-1), openjdk-6-jre-headless | java6-runtime-headless Conffiles: /etc/default/activemq 3353e02e20e45a2224c1559f7e52e0a7 /etc/activemq/instances-available/main/log4j.properties 7a52b5daa7fba629b28bc9c05ccc3dc0 /etc/activemq/instances-available/main/activemq.xml 0d815a59ffa96e5978540ceee4623b56 /etc/init.d/activemq 8eb32df2af38fce26258548ae04c538b Description: Java message broker - server Apache ActiveMQ is a message broker built around Java Message Service (JMS) API : allow sending messages between two or more clients in a loosely coupled, reliable, and asynchronous way. . This message broker supports : * JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4 with support for transient, persistent, transactional and XA messaging * Spring Framework, CXF and Axis integration * pluggable transport protocols such as in-VM, TCP, SSL, NIO, UDP, multicast, JGroups and JXTA * persistence using JDBC along with journaling * OpenWire (cross language wire protocol) and Stomp (Streaming Text Orientated Messaging Protocol) protocols . This package contains a server installation of ActiveMQ. Homepage: http://activemq.apache.org # # unzip -p /usr/share/activemq/lib/optional/xstream.jar META-INF/maven/com.thoughtworks.xstream/xstream/pom.properties #POM properties #Mon May 28 22:20:08 UTC 2012 version=1.4.2 groupId=com.thoughtworks.xstream debianVersion=debian type=jar classifier= artifactId=xstream # [1] http://blog.diniscruz.com/2013/12/xstream-remote-code-execution-exploit.html [2] http://xstream.codehaus.org/security.html __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Bug#769248: androidsdk-tools: FTBFS in jessie/i386: sdkstats/src/main/java/com/android/sdkstats/DdmsPreferenceStore.java:22: error: package org.eclipse.jface.preference does not exist
merge 770457 769248 affects 770457 androidsdk-tools thanks The problem lies in eclipse-rcp. I confirm that androidsdk-tools builds fine on i386 when all jface components are correctly installed into eclipse-rcp:i386. Hence I am going to merge #770457 with #769248. Markus signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed (with 2 errors): Re: androidsdk-tools: FTBFS in jessie/i386: sdkstats/src/main/java/com/android/sdkstats/DdmsPreferenceStore.java:22: error: package org.eclipse.jface.preference does not exi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: merge 770457 769248 Bug #770457 [eclipse-rcp] eclipse-rcp: debian/rules build-arch does not install some files in eclipse-rcp Unable to merge bugs because: blocks of #769248 is '' not '769248' blockedby of #769248 is '770457' not '' owner of #769248 is '' not 'Markus Koschany a...@gambaru.de' package of #769248 is 'src:androidsdk-tools' not 'eclipse-rcp' Failed to merge 770457: Did not alter merged bugs affects 770457 androidsdk-tools Failed to mark 770457 as affecting package(s): failed to get lock on /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/770457 -- Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/770457 Resource temporarily unavailable. Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/770457 Resource temporarily unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 629. Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/770457 Resource temporarily unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 629. Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/770457 Resource temporarily unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 629. Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/770457 Resource temporarily unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 629. Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/770457 Resource temporarily unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 629. Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/770457 Resource temporarily unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 629. Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/770457 Resource temporarily unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 629. Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/770457 Resource temporarily unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 629. Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/770457 Resource temporarily unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 629. at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 587 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 769248: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=769248 770457: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=770457 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed (with 1 errors): Merge 770457 769248
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: forcemerge 770457 769248 Bug #770457 [eclipse-rcp] eclipse-rcp: debian/rules build-arch does not install some files in eclipse-rcp Unable to merge bugs because: package of #769248 is 'src:androidsdk-tools' not 'eclipse-rcp' Failed to forcibly merge 770457: Did not alter merged bugs thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 769248: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=769248 770457: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=770457 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed (with 1 errors): Forcemerge 770457 769248
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 769248 eclipse-rcp Bug #769248 [src:androidsdk-tools] androidsdk-tools: FTBFS in jessie/i386: sdkstats/src/main/java/com/android/sdkstats/DdmsPreferenceStore.java:22: error: package org.eclipse.jface.preference does not exist Bug reassigned from package 'src:androidsdk-tools' to 'eclipse-rcp'. No longer marked as found in versions androidsdk-tools/22.2+git20130830~92d25d6-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #769248 to the same values previously set forcemerge 770457 769248 Bug #770457 [eclipse-rcp] eclipse-rcp: debian/rules build-arch does not install some files in eclipse-rcp Bug #770457 [eclipse-rcp] eclipse-rcp: debian/rules build-arch does not install some files in eclipse-rcp Added tag(s) sid and jessie. Bug #769248 [eclipse-rcp] androidsdk-tools: FTBFS in jessie/i386: sdkstats/src/main/java/com/android/sdkstats/DdmsPreferenceStore.java:22: error: package org.eclipse.jface.preference does not exist Failed to forcibly merge 770457: It is nonsensical for a bug to block itself (or a merged partner): 769248 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 769248: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=769248 770457: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=770457 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Bug#770457: androidsdk-tools: FTBFS in jessie/i386: sdkstats/src/main/java/com/android/sdkstats/DdmsPreferenceStore.java:22: error: package org.eclipse.jface.preference does not exist
Control: tags -1 patch I have committed the patch to Git master. I'm also going to attach it to this bug report. We probably need to revert the last revision or parts of it to get this bug fix into Jessie. Two other RC bugs for eclipse are still left. Markus From 1195adf5c7c4168cbf97d9d03f838c144d5ae51f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Markus Koschany a...@gambaru.de Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 03:05:11 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] fix bug 770457 --- debian/changelog | 9 + debian/rules | 29 +++-- 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 6ad6242..44b8e13 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +eclipse (3.8.1-7) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Install all arch-dependent files into eclipse-rcp correctly by renaming +override_dh_install to override_dh_install-arch. +Fix wrong override for dh_install-indep and move jh_classpath commands to the +appropriate override target. (Closes: #770457) + + -- Markus Koschany a...@gambaru.de Mon, 24 Nov 2014 02:31:41 +0100 + eclipse (3.8.1-6) unstable; urgency=medium [ Emmanuel Bourg ] diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules index 8fcf686..c681a8a 100755 --- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ COPY_PLATFORM_INSTALL:=debian/tmp$(COPY_PLATFORM) PDEBUILD_INSTALL:=debian/tmp/usr/lib/eclipse/buildscripts/pde-build PDEBUILDVERSION = $(shell ls debian/tmp/usr/lib/eclipse/dropins/sdk/plugins | grep org.eclipse.pde.build_ | sed 's/org.eclipse.pde.build_//') -override_dh_install: +override_dh_install-arch: # move jdt from /usr/lib to /usr/share cd debian/tmp/usr mkdir -p share/eclipse/dropins mv lib/eclipse/dropins/jdt share/eclipse/dropins # move images from /usr/lib to /usr/share @@ -88,11 +88,21 @@ override_dh_install: usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)/jni find $(CFG_OSGI_BUNDLES_PATH) -depth -type d -a -empty -delete # Check if we are doing a -B build - [ ! -d debian/eclipse-platform-data ] || debian/rules override_dh_install_indep + [ ! -d debian/eclipse-platform-data ] || debian/rules override_dh_install-indep chmod 0644 debian/eclipse-rcp/usr/lib/eclipse/about_files/IJG_README + # Expose org.eclipse.jface and its dependencies + mkdir -p debian/eclipse-rcp/usr/share/java + cd debian/eclipse-rcp/usr/share/java; \ + ln -s ../../lib/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.jface_*.jar; \ + ln -s org.eclipse.jface_*.jar org.eclipse.jface.jar; \ + ln -s ../../lib/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.core.commands_*.jar; \ + ln -s org.eclipse.core.commands_*.jar org.eclipse.core.commands.jar; \ + ln -s ../../lib/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.equinox.common_*.jar; \ + ln -s org.eclipse.equinox.common_*.jar org.eclipse.equinox.common.jar # Operations on arch: all packages - not invoked if building with -B -override_dh_install_indep: +override_dh_install-indep: + dh_install --indep # mv arch-indep plugins from lib to share cd debian/eclipse-platform-data/usr find lib/ -type f -path '*lib/eclipse/*' | perl ../../../debian/extra/imagemv.pl # Expose osgi jars @@ -114,17 +124,8 @@ override_dh_install_indep: mh_installjar -v -plibequinox-osgi-java $$pom debian/libequinox-osgi-java/usr/share/java/org.eclipse.$$SUFFIX.jar; \ done - # Expose org.eclipse.jface and its dependencies - - mkdir -p debian/eclipse-rcp/usr/share/java - cd debian/eclipse-rcp/usr/share/java; \ - ln -s ../../lib/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.jface_*.jar; \ - ln -s org.eclipse.jface_*.jar org.eclipse.jface.jar; \ - ln -s ../../lib/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.core.commands_*.jar; \ - ln -s org.eclipse.core.commands_*.jar org.eclipse.core.commands.jar; \ - ln -s ../../lib/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.equinox.common_*.jar; \ - ln -s org.eclipse.equinox.common_*.jar org.eclipse.equinox.common.jar - +override_jh_classpath: + jh_classpath jh_classpath -corg.eclipse.core.commands.jar org.eclipse.equinox.common.jar \ debian/eclipse-rcp/usr/share/java/org.eclipse.jface.jar jh_classpath -corg.eclipse.equinox.common.jar \ -- 2.1.3 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: androidsdk-tools: FTBFS in jessie/i386: sdkstats/src/main/java/com/android/sdkstats/DdmsPreferenceStore.java:22: error: package org.eclipse.jface.preference does not exist
Processing control commands: tags -1 patch Bug #770457 [eclipse-rcp] eclipse-rcp: debian/rules build-arch does not install some files in eclipse-rcp Added tag(s) patch. -- 770457: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=770457 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: unblock 769248 by 770457
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: unblock 769248 by 770457 Bug #769248 [eclipse-rcp] androidsdk-tools: FTBFS in jessie/i386: sdkstats/src/main/java/com/android/sdkstats/DdmsPreferenceStore.java:22: error: package org.eclipse.jface.preference does not exist 769248 was blocked by: 770457 769248 was not blocking any bugs. Removed blocking bug(s) of 769248: 770457 forcemerge 770457 769248 Bug #770457 [eclipse-rcp] eclipse-rcp: debian/rules build-arch does not install some files in eclipse-rcp Bug #769248 [eclipse-rcp] androidsdk-tools: FTBFS in jessie/i386: sdkstats/src/main/java/com/android/sdkstats/DdmsPreferenceStore.java:22: error: package org.eclipse.jface.preference does not exist Owner recorded as Markus Koschany a...@gambaru.de. Marked as found in versions eclipse/3.8.1-5.1. Added tag(s) patch. Merged 769248 770457 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 769248: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=769248 770457: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=770457 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: closing 770441
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: close 770441 Bug #770441 [src:androidsdk-tools] androidsdk-tools: Vcs-* fields do not point to a valid repository Marked Bug as done thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 770441: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=770441 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: tagging 770744
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 770744 + patch Bug #770744 [src:javamail] javamail: FTBFS under pbuilder with USENETWORK=no: Test failure Added tag(s) patch. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 770744: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=770744 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Bug#770744: javamail: FTBFS under pbuilder with USENETWORK=no: Test failure
On 11/23/2014 02:03 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: Le 23/11/2014 22:20, tony mancill a écrit : Emmanuel, any concerns with an upload to disable this test? I share the same feelings and I think this kind of failure should be ignored. My only concern is that we weaken the test coverage and I tend to dislike that, but if hitting a DNS server is a severe policy violation then let's upload a new version. I'm not sure if it is going to be considered RC or not, so I've pushed a patch to the repo that we can use if we need to upload, or revert if it's not required. tony signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Bug#770780: Apache ActiveMQ Packaged with Old XStream Library
On 11/23/2014 04:54 PM, Georgi Geshev wrote: Package: activemq Version: 5.6.0+dfsg-1 Apache ActiveMQ as packaged for Debian seems to ship with an old XStream (1.4.2) library[1][2] which allows for instantiating arbitrary classes. This could be leveraged for system command execution as demonstrated against versions before 1.4.7. Hello Georgi, Thank you for the bug report. Could you confirm that this bug report is for Debian stable (wheezy)? Debian testing has had xstream 1.4.7 since March of 2014. Therefore, I believe this is a security bug against the version of libxstream-java found in wheezy. Note that activemq ships a symlink to /usr/share/java/xstream.jar and not the JAR itself, which is installed by the libxstream-java package. If you need an immediate fix, you should be able to install a newer xstream [0] .deb (or symlink to another newer copy of xstream on your system). Thank you, tony [0] https://packages.qa.debian.org/libx/libxstream-java.html signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
