libnu-htmlparser-java_1.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Since this hasn't been re-processed; I'm clearing it. Please re-upload if it's fit for the archive From a year ago, Thorsten left a note: the license of some files says that: You are granted a license to use, reproduce and create derivative works of this document. === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Comments regarding snappy-java_1.1.1.6-1_amd64.changes
Howdy maintainer, This is a new upstream release during freeze. Have you talked with the Release Team? Would you like me to reject this so you can retarget experimental? Thanks! Paul __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Comments regarding openjdk-7-jre-dcevm_7u55-1_amd64.changes
Howdy maintainer, E: openjdk-7-jre-dcevm source: build-depends-on-obsolete-package build-depends: hardening-wrapper = use dpkg-buildflags instead Appears valid You should address this. Thanks, Paul __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
groovy2_2.2.2+dfsg-2_amd64.changes REJECTED
Howdy maintainer, Your debian/patches are GPL-2. Upstream is apache2. These licenses are not compatable. Please relicense those patches to GPL-3+ or apache2. Thanks, Paul === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
groovy2_2.2.2+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
See other mail === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Comments regarding css2xslfo_1.6.2-1_amd64.changes
Howdy maintainer, Upstream should likely know that LICENCE is in fact spelled LICENSE. In addition, please get upstream to use a sane license. The stuff that's in there now is really troubling, but since you followed up and they claim it's public domain, I'm willing to not reject this. Please get upstream to declare public domain in the license file. Cheers, Paul __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Comments regarding jssc_2.6.0-1_i386.changes
Howdy maintainer, It's mildly concerning to have all these bianries in the source package. I can't tell if they're actually built form the sources in question, but you're rebuilding everything OK in debian/rules. It's make me feel better if they were removed in a DFSG repack, we totally don't need all these windows DLLs and Solaris .so files in our archive. I'm going to let this through, but I'd strongly suggest that you consider removing these guys from the Debian sources. Cheers, Paul __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
findbugs_2.0.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Howdy maintainer, I'm sorry, i've had to reject this package, src/antTask/edu/umd/cs/findbugs/anttask/FindBugsTask.java src/gui/edu/umd/cs/findbugs/gui2/CloudCommentsPane.java contains license restrictions that aren't in the copyright. Please fix and reupload Thanks! Paul === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
doxia-1.0_1.0~alpha-6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Howdy maintainer, Sorry, but I've had to reject this package, doxia-core/src/test/resources/convert/in/sample.c contains:: /* Copyright (c) 1994-1999 Pixware. This file is part of the Pixware xs library. For conditions of distribution and use, see the accompanying legal.txt file. */ However:: $ find . -name legal.txt $ Can you please clarify this with upstream and get the licensing intact? Thanks! Paul === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
janino_2.6.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Howdy! I'm sorry, but I'm REJECT'ing this package - The jar has no sources in it (Is this rebuilt at build-time for the version in the archive? I didn't go through the java helpers carefully enough, I see it shipped) - All the source is stuck in zips. Can we do a DFSG repack that uncompresses that and removes that jar? Minor issue (thanks to one of our ftp trainees) W: libjanino-java: wrong-section-according-to-package-name libjanino-java = java Perhaps this can be fixed too :) License-wise, it looks fine. When it's re-uploaded, let me know so I can process this directly. Cheers, Paul === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Comments regarding aspectj-maven-plugin_1.4-1_amd64.changes
Howdy maintainer, The correct DEP5 term for upstream's license is `Expat' not `MIT'. Please also comply with policy 4.9's requirement that get-orig-source can be invoked from anywhere (not just in the package root) It'd be nice to get both of these fixed in the next upload. Cheers, Paul __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Comments regarding boilerpipe_1.2.0-1_amd64.changes
Howdy maintainer, You depend on debhelper 8 but only use compat 7. You can likely bump that or drop the dependency. In addition, get-orig-source targets must run anywhere (not just from the package root), so please fix this in your next upload. Thanks! Paul __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
