Re: Is java-package dead?

2007-06-27 Thread Michael Koch
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 04:08:44AM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
 I just noticed there's not been any updates to java-package
 either in Debian or the svn tree, since late last year.
 
 Meanwhile, bugs are accumulating in the BTS, and neither the
 current IBM Java 5 release nor Java 6 prerelease are supported,
 although for Java5 it looks like a simple renaming is all that's
 needed.
 
 Is the issue just that java-package is no longer interested to the
 original maintainers, with the admission of Sun's JDK/JRE to non-free?
 
 Or is it felt that the Java runtimes, sdks and classes in the
 archive are now good enough that even platforms without a Sun
 JDK/JRE are sufficiently supported?
 
 If it's the former, I'd be willing to put some time into updating
 java-package, as long as it's not going to simply languish as a
 patch in the BTS...
 
 (If it's the latter, I'd be interested to know if anyone's run up
 ColdFusion MX J2EE with one of the free JVMs on tomcat5.5? It's giving
 me some insolence at the moment. ^_^)
 
 Feel free to CC me, I'm not subscribed to this list.

I uploaded java-package 0.29 to unstable yesterday. Feel free to report
bugs against it for thinsgs that doesn't work.


Cheers,
Michael
-- 
 .''`.  | Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :' :  | Free Java Developer http://www.classpath.org
`. `'   |
  `-| 1024D/BAC5 4B28 D436 95E6 F2E0 BD11 5923 A008 2763 483B

___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


Is java-package dead?

2007-05-27 Thread Paul TBBle Hampson
I just noticed there's not been any updates to java-package
either in Debian or the svn tree, since late last year.

Meanwhile, bugs are accumulating in the BTS, and neither the
current IBM Java 5 release nor Java 6 prerelease are supported,
although for Java5 it looks like a simple renaming is all that's
needed.

Is the issue just that java-package is no longer interested to the
original maintainers, with the admission of Sun's JDK/JRE to non-free?

Or is it felt that the Java runtimes, sdks and classes in the
archive are now good enough that even platforms without a Sun
JDK/JRE are sufficiently supported?

If it's the former, I'd be willing to put some time into updating
java-package, as long as it's not going to simply languish as a
patch in the BTS...

(If it's the latter, I'd be interested to know if anyone's run up
ColdFusion MX J2EE with one of the free JVMs on tomcat5.5? It's giving
me some insolence at the moment. ^_^)

Feel free to CC me, I'm not subscribed to this list.

-- 
---
Paul TBBle Hampson, B.Sc, LPI, MCSE
On-hiatus Asian Studies student, ANU
The Boss, Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Of course Pacman didn't influence us as kids. If it did,
we'd be running around in darkened rooms, popping pills and
listening to repetitive music.
 -- Kristian Wilson, Nintendo, Inc, 1989

License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.1/au/
---


pgpXlFkZgLsDu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers