Re: Processed: block 642775 with 642933

[Sylvestre Ledru]

reassign 642933 openjdk-6
forcemerge 642933 641530
thanks

Le dimanche 25 septembre 2011 à 21:27 +, Debian Bug Tracking System
a écrit :
 Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
 
  block 642775 with 642933
 Bug #642775 [src:gpsbabel] gpsbabel: FTBFS: 
 java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Cannot open file sRGB.pf
 Was not blocked by any bugs.
 Added blocking bug(s) of 642775: 642933
Actually, this bug has been fixed with the upload 6b23~pre9-2 from
Damien Raude-Morvan
http://packages.qa.debian.org/o/openjdk-6/news/20110923T230425Z.html
a rebuild should fix the problem.

Sylvestre


__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Processed: block 642775 with 642933

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 reassign 642933 openjdk-6
Bug #642933 [fop] gpsbabel: FTBFS: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Cannot 
open file sRGB.pf
Bug reassigned from package 'fop' to 'openjdk-6'.
 forcemerge 642933 641530
Bug#642933: gpsbabel: FTBFS: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Cannot open 
file sRGB.pf
Bug#641530: fop: fails with java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Cannot open 
file sRGB.pf
Forcibly Merged 641530 642933.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
642933: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=642933
641530: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=641530
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Bug#642740: xorg-docs: FTBFS: make[3]: *** [fonts.pdf] Error 1

[Julien Cristau]

reassign 642740 fop 1:1.0.dfsg2-3
kthxbye

On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 22:21:49 +0200, Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote:

 Source: xorg-docs
 Version: 1:1.6-1
 Severity: serious
 Tags: wheezy sid
 User: debian...@lists.debian.org
 Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
 Justification: FTBFS on amd64
 
 Hi,
 
 During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
 amd64.
 
 Relevant part:
  make[2]: Entering directory 
  `/build/xorg-docs-s3LQAp/xorg-docs-1.6/build/general'
  Making all in fonts
  make[3]: Entering directory 
  `/build/xorg-docs-s3LQAp/xorg-docs-1.6/build/general/fonts'
GENfonts.html
GENfonts.pdf
  make[3]: *** [fonts.pdf] Error 1
 
 The full build log is available from:

 http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2011/09/23/xorg-docs_1:1.6-1_lsid64.buildlog
 
If there's a bug in xorg-docs here, it's that it's using silent rules.

Cheers,
Julien

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#642740: xorg-docs: FTBFS: make[3]: *** [fonts.pdf] Error 1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 reassign 642740 fop 1:1.0.dfsg2-3
Bug #642740 [src:xorg-docs] xorg-docs: FTBFS: make[3]: *** [fonts.pdf] Error 1
Bug reassigned from package 'src:xorg-docs' to 'fop'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions xorg-docs/1:1.6-1.
Bug #642740 [fop] xorg-docs: FTBFS: make[3]: *** [fonts.pdf] Error 1
There is no source info for the package 'fop' at version '1:1.0.dfsg2-3' with 
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '1:1.0.dfsg2-3'
Bug Marked as found in versions 1:1.0.dfsg2-3.
 kthxbye
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
642740: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=642740
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: JRuby packaging

[Torsten Werner]

Hi Alex,

JRuby is in main now. The open tasks are:

- upstream update to latest 1.5.x
- switch packaging to cdbs and dh
- upstream update to 1.6.x
- do no longer build bundle foreign classes into jruby.jar

Cheers,
Torsten

On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Torsten Werner twer...@debian.org wrote:
 Am 13.09.2011 12:22, schrieb Alex Young:
 Is this something we can help with?  I seem to recall there was a
 problem of bundled jars not being distributed with their source - is
 that still the blocker?

 Yes it is. I have uploaded version 1.5.1+dfsg1-1 to experimental
 yesterday. This version has fewer bundled jar files in the orig tarball.
 Could you check if there are any regressions compared to the unstable
 version?

 I've seen some issues in the tests during the build. I'll try to find
 the cause for that.

 Torsten


__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: JRuby packaging

[Alex Young]

On 20/09/2011 07:51, Torsten Werner wrote:

Hi Alex,

JRuby is in main now.


Fantastic news!  I've been testing the +dfsg4-2 package against a few 
local test suites and I can't see any regressions so far.  I'll let you 
know if anything crops up.



The open tasks are:

- upstream update to latest 1.5.x
- switch packaging to cdbs and dh
- upstream update to 1.6.x
- do no longer build bundle foreign classes into jruby.jar



Thanks,
--
Alex



Cheers,
Torsten

On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Torsten Wernertwer...@debian.org  wrote:

Am 13.09.2011 12:22, schrieb Alex Young:

Is this something we can help with?  I seem to recall there was a
problem of bundled jars not being distributed with their source - is
that still the blocker?


Yes it is. I have uploaded version 1.5.1+dfsg1-1 to experimental
yesterday. This version has fewer bundled jar files in the orig tarball.
Could you check if there are any regressions compared to the unstable
version?

I've seen some issues in the tests during the build. I'll try to find
the cause for that.

Torsten




__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: JRuby packaging

[Torsten Werner]

Am 13.09.2011 12:22, schrieb Alex Young:
 Is this something we can help with?  I seem to recall there was a
 problem of bundled jars not being distributed with their source - is
 that still the blocker?

Yes it is. I have uploaded version 1.5.1+dfsg1-1 to experimental
yesterday. This version has fewer bundled jar files in the orig tarball.
Could you check if there are any regressions compared to the unstable
version?

I've seen some issues in the tests during the build. I'll try to find
the cause for that.

Torsten

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#641530: fop: fails with java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Cannot open file sRGB.pf

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 reassign 641530 openjdk-6
Bug #641530 [fop] fop: fails with java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Cannot 
open file sRGB.pf
Bug reassigned from package 'fop' to 'openjdk-6'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions fop/1:1.0.dfsg2-2.
 forcemerge 641530 639883
Bug#641530: fop: fails with java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Cannot open 
file sRGB.pf
Bug#639883: openjdk-6: Can't load standard profile: LINEAR_RGB.pf
Mismatch - only Bugs in the same package can be forcibly merged:
Bug 639883 is not in the same package as 641530
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
639883: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=639883
641530: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=641530
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: JRuby packaging

[Sébastien Delafond]

Hi Alex,

a while ago I transferred maintenance of jruby over to the Debian Java
Maintainers, whom I cc'ed to this email. They'll probably be able to
tell you more...

Cheers,

--Seb

On Sep/12, Alex Young wrote:
 Hi there,
 
 I'm emailing you because your name is on the Debian jruby-1.5.1
 package.  Do you know if there is a current attempt to package a
 more recent version of jruby than 1.5.1?  If so, could you point me
 in the right direction?  If not, it's just possible I might be able
 to convince my employer to stump up some manpower to take it on.
 
 Thanks,
 -- 
 Alex
 

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: JRuby packaging

[Torsten Werner]

Hi Alex,

my first priority is getting jruby into Debian main. It is currently in
non-free. I'll put that task on the top of my stack. Any upstream
updates might follow later.

Cheers,
Torsten

Am 13.09.2011 09:23, schrieb Sébastien Delafond:
 Hi Alex,
 
 a while ago I transferred maintenance of jruby over to the Debian Java
 Maintainers, whom I cc'ed to this email. They'll probably be able to
 tell you more...
 
 Cheers,
 
 --Seb
 
 On Sep/12, Alex Young wrote:
 Hi there,

 I'm emailing you because your name is on the Debian jruby-1.5.1
 package.  Do you know if there is a current attempt to package a
 more recent version of jruby than 1.5.1?  If so, could you point me
 in the right direction?  If not, it's just possible I might be able
 to convince my employer to stump up some manpower to take it on.

 Thanks,
 -- 
 Alex

 
 __
 This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
 http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers.
  Please use
 debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: JRuby packaging

[Alex Young]

On 13/09/11 10:22, Torsten Werner wrote:
 Hi Alex,
 
 my first priority is getting jruby into Debian main. It is currently in
 non-free. I'll put that task on the top of my stack. Any upstream
 updates might follow later.

Is this something we can help with?  I seem to recall there was a
problem of bundled jars not being distributed with their source - is
that still the blocker?

Thanks,
-- 
Alex

 
 Cheers,
 Torsten
 
 Am 13.09.2011 09:23, schrieb Sébastien Delafond:
 Hi Alex,

 a while ago I transferred maintenance of jruby over to the Debian Java
 Maintainers, whom I cc'ed to this email. They'll probably be able to
 tell you more...

 Cheers,

 --Seb

 On Sep/12, Alex Young wrote:
 Hi there,

 I'm emailing you because your name is on the Debian jruby-1.5.1
 package.  Do you know if there is a current attempt to package a
 more recent version of jruby than 1.5.1?  If so, could you point me
 in the right direction?  If not, it's just possible I might be able
 to convince my employer to stump up some manpower to take it on.

 Thanks,
 -- 
 Alex


 __
 This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
 http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers.
  Please use
 debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
 


__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: surefire: FTBFS: You must specify a valid JAVA_HOME or JAVACMD!

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tag 641380 + pending
Bug #641380 {Done: Miguel Landaeta mig...@miguel.cc} [surefire] surefire: 
FTBFS: You must specify a valid JAVA_HOME or JAVACMD!
Added tag(s) pending.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
641380: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=641380
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: libxerces2-java: Depends-line broken due to hidden special character

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 612124 - moreinfo
Bug #612124 [libxerces2-java] libxerces2-java: Depends-line broken due to 
hidden special character
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
 fixed 612124 libxerces2-java/2.11.0-1
Bug #612124 [libxerces2-java] libxerces2-java: Depends-line broken due to 
hidden special character
Bug Marked as fixed in versions libxerces2-java/2.11.0-1.
 quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
612124: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612124
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#640813: java-wrappers: find_java_runtime function is broken for openjdk

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 severity 640813 serious
Bug #640813 [java-wrappers] java-wrappers: find_java_runtime function is broken 
for openjdk
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
640813: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640813
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#640354: libisfreetype-5.2-java: circular dependency with libisnativec-java

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 640354 + wontfix
Bug #640354 [libisfreetype-5.2-java] libisfreetype-5.2-java: circular 
dependency with libisnativec-java
Added tag(s) wontfix.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
640354: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640354
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Comments regarding libtritonus-java_20070428-9_amd64.changes

[Torsten Werner]

Am 01.09.2011 22:51, schrieb Torsten Werner:
 that is wrong. I've rejected the package by myself.

I've uploaded a new version yesterday.

Cheers,
Torsten

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#621464: It works...

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 severity 621464 important
Bug #621464 [sweethome3d] sweethome3d: Segmentation fault on startup
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
621464: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=621464
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Comments regarding libtritonus-java_20070428-9_amd64.changes

[Torsten Werner]

Hi Ansgar,

On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 12:50 AM, Ansgar Burchardt ftpmas...@debian.org wrote:
 libtritonus-jni is supposed to ship the jni shared libraries, but it's just an
 empty package (on amd64). Is that intentional?

that is wrong. I've rejected the package by myself.

Torsten

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: FTBFS: POM 'org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-plugin-plugin' not found in repository

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tag 639828 + pending
Bug #639828 [access-modifier-checker] FTBFS: POM 
'org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-plugin-plugin' not found in repository
Added tag(s) pending.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
639828: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=639828
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#634563: xmlunit: FTBFS: [apply] grep: at10.log: No such file or directory

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 reassign 634563 dblatex
Bug #634563 [src:xmlunit] xmlunit: FTBFS: [apply] grep: at10.log: No such 
file or directory
Bug reassigned from package 'src:xmlunit' to 'dblatex'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions xmlunit/1.3-1.
 found 634563 0.3.2-1
Bug #634563 [dblatex] xmlunit: FTBFS: [apply] grep: at10.log: No such file 
or directory
Bug Marked as found in versions dblatex/0.3.2-1.
 affects 0.3.2-1 xmlunit
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
634563: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=634563
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: fop: FTBFS twice in a row

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tag 639515 + pending
Bug #639515 [fop] fop: FTBFS twice in a row
Added tag(s) pending.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
639515: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=639515
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#638431: libjogl2-java: FTBFS on some architecture

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 severity 638431 important
Bug #638431 [src:libjogl2-java] libjogl2-java: FTBFS on some architecture
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
638431: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=638431
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: [Pkg-puppet-devel] MCollective Debian packages

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 block 563951 by 634868
Bug #563951 [wnpp] ITP: mcollective -- build server orchestration or parallel 
job execution systems
Was blocked by: 627778
Added blocking bug(s) of 563951: 634868
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
563951: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=563951
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Bug#637656: unavailable build depends

[Damien Raude-Morvan]

Le mardi 16 août 2011 13:58:45, Damien Raude-Morvan a écrit :
 On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 13:10:01 +0200, Torsten Werner twer...@debian.org
 
 wrote:
  Hi Damien, Hi Ludovic,
 
 Hi,
 
  m-d-h version 1.4.4 is already committed to the svn repo. Is it ready
  for upload? What about m-r-h 1.5.2?
 
 I'll try to do some checks and upload both packages this evening.

Ok, I need a fix for #637213 before I can do an upload to unstable.
Can anyone have a look at this one ?

Cheers,
-- 
Damien


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

RE: Confirmation Letter From Microsoft/Yahoo Web Team

[King, Gary]

From: King, Gary
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 11:06 AM
To: King, Gary
Subject: Confirmation Letter From Microsoft/Yahoo Web Team


This is a confidential message from the Microsoft/Yahoo Office, You have been 
approved by the Microsoft/Yahoo Foundation Payment Board to receive a cash 
grant of $552,000.00 Dollars E-mail us on: 
msoft-helpde...@hotmail.commailto:msoft-helpde...@hotmail.com


Contact Secertary- Mr. Wilson Harlings on this email: 
msoft-helpde...@hotmail.commailto:msoft-helpde...@hotmail.com

Provide him With
1. Full Name:
2. Address:
3. Tel/Mobile:
4. Occupation:
5. Date of Birth:
6. Payment number: G-900-94



Note: All response and Queries concerning your claims should be sent via email 
to :(msoft-helpde...@hotmail.commailto:msoft-helpde...@hotmail.com)



King Gary- Announcer

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: 
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain proprietary and 
privileged information for the use of the designated recipients named above. 
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. 
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply 
e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#637213: FTBFS due to missing jtidy maven artifact

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 reassign 637213 src:jtidy 7+svn20110807-1
Bug #637213 [maven-invoker-plugin] FTBFS due to missing jtidy maven artifact
Bug reassigned from package 'maven-invoker-plugin' to 'src:jtidy'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions 1.3-2.
Bug #637213 [src:jtidy] FTBFS due to missing jtidy maven artifact
Bug Marked as found in versions jtidy/7+svn20110807-1.
 retitle 637213 jtidy: It doesn't install expected jtidy maven artifact
Bug #637213 [src:jtidy] FTBFS due to missing jtidy maven artifact
Changed Bug title to 'jtidy: It doesn't install expected jtidy maven artifact' 
from 'FTBFS due to missing jtidy maven artifact'
 affects 637213 + src:maven-invoker-plugin
Bug #637213 [src:jtidy] jtidy: It doesn't install expected jtidy maven artifact
Added indication that 637213 affects src:maven-invoker-plugin
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
637213: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=637213
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#637213: FTBFS due to missing jtidy maven artifact

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 reassign 637213 maven-invoker-plugin
Bug #637213 [src:jtidy] jtidy: It doesn't install expected jtidy maven artifact
Bug reassigned from package 'src:jtidy' to 'maven-invoker-plugin'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions jtidy/7+svn20110807-1.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
637213: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=637213
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Mario Joussen's Debian packages: asterisk-prompt-de

[Lionel Elie Mamane]

On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:14:20PM +0200, Mario Joußen wrote:

 since I'm not using Asterisk anymore I would be happy if the
 pkg-voip group could take it over.

OK, will do. Nice to see you are still around.

Have fun!

-- 
Lionel

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: jenkins for Debian (was: Bug#561963: retitling to RFP)

[James Page]

Hi Martin

On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 18:08 +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
 Dear Java team,
 
 we are currently investigating the possibility of using
 jenkins.debian.net to support building packages directly out of VCS.

Sounds interesting - let me know if I can help out in anyway.

 James Page of Canonical has already put a lot of effort into
 packaging jenkins in accordance with Debian policy.
 
 Currently he seems to be waiting for some support from the side of
 Debian to resolve outstanding issues and sponsor the package upload
 into the Debian archive.

The majority of the package-set to support Jenkins has now been accepted
into Ubuntu (the last 7 are in the NEW queue for Oneiric ATM).  I have
been feeding these back to Debian when I get the time (I have about 19
remaining); Tony Mancill and Damien Raude-Morvan have been reviewing and
sponsoring my packaging as its produced and to-date have outpaced my
ability to submit requests for sponsorship - so as far as I'm concerned
I've got the support I need ATM.

Cheers

James

-- 
James Page
Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server Team


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: jenkins for Debian (was: Bug#561963: retitling to RFP)

[martin f krafft]

also sprach James Page james.p...@canonical.com [2011.07.30.1901 +0200]:
 The majority of the package-set to support Jenkins has now been accepted
 into Ubuntu (the last 7 are in the NEW queue for Oneiric ATM).  I have
 been feeding these back to Debian when I get the time (I have about 19
 remaining); Tony Mancill and Damien Raude-Morvan have been reviewing and
 sponsoring my packaging as its produced and to-date have outpaced my
 ability to submit requests for sponsorship - so as far as I'm concerned
 I've got the support I need ATM.

Oh, that's great, for I read from your message that we can expect
jenkins in Debian sometime in the near future!

Thanks!

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft madduck@d.o  Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer   http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
a gourmet concerned about calories is like a punter eyeing the clock.


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Bug#561963: jenkins for Debian (was: Bug#561963: retitling to RFP)

[Damien Raude-Morvan]

Hi Martin,

Le samedi 30 juillet 2011 18:08:59, martin f krafft a écrit :
 Dear Java team,
 
 we are currently investigating the possibility of using
 jenkins.debian.net to support building packages directly out of VCS.
 
 James Page of Canonical has already put a lot of effort into
 packaging jenkins in accordance with Debian policy.
[...]
 Would the pkg-java team be able to cooperate with James to get
 jenkins into Debian proper?

Sponsoring and reviewing effort is already underway. AFAIK, many packages have 
been sponsored by me and Tony Mancil.

IIRC, all submitted RFS have been uploaded, but many packages are still 
missing :
http://qa.debian.org/wnpp.php?login=james.page%40canonical.com
http://qa.debian.org/wnpp.php?login=james.page%40ubuntu.com

James, could you provide a (link ?) to updated status of your packaging effort 
? And is there something we (Debian Java Team) could do to help you ?

Cheers,
-- 
Damien


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Mario Joussen's Debian packages: asterisk-prompt-de, rxtx

[Mario Joußen]

Hi Lionel,

since I'm not using Asterisk anymore I would be happy if the pkg-voip 
group could take it over.


Cheers, Mario

Am 29.07.2011 12:29, schrieb Lionel Elie Mamane:

Hi Mario,

In my work for the pkg-voip team, I became interested in the
asterisk-prompt-de package in Debian, of which you are the registered
maintainer. You might have noticed I started to discuss with the
reporter about bug #508463.

Are you still interested in maintaining that package, and in being
active in Debian generally? I ask before the last Debian-related
activity of yours I found dates back to July 2008; but maybe there was
some activity of yours that I missed in my cursory search. Ah yes, you
voted in the 2009 DPL elections.

If you don't want or can't take care of asterisk-prompt-de anymore,
would it be OK for you if pkg-voip took it over? An alternative that
we would be very glad about is if you decided to join pkg-voip and
co-maintain that package with us :)

If you don't wish, or can't, participate in Debian in general anymore,
could you please inform the project officially? To do that:

  - Send an gpg-signed email about why you are leaving the project to
debian-priv...@lists.debian.org.

  - Notify the Debian key ring maintainers that you are leaving by
opening a ticket in Debian RT by sending a mail to
keyr...@rt.debian.org  with the words 'Debian RT' somewhere in the
subject line (case doesn't matter).

This procedure ensures you can more easily return should you wish so
in the future.

Obviously, if you want to become active again (or have been in a way
that has escaped my search), that is even better!


This email is copied to pkg-java-maintainers because one
team-maintained package of yours has Mario as uploader; so maybe one
of you has heard from Mario semi-recently?


Thanks in advance for letting us know what's up,




__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#635656: libjogl2-java: Update libswt-gtk-3.6-java to libswt-gtk-3-java

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tag 635656 +pending
Bug #635656 [libjogl2-java] libjogl2-java: Update libswt-gtk-3.6-java to 
libswt-gtk-3-java
Added tag(s) pending.
 # team upload; uploaded to delayed/3
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
635656: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=635656
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Bug#635396: RM: libswt-cairo-gtk-3.6-jni libswt-glx-gtk-3.6-jni libswt-gnome-gtk-3.6-jni libswt-gtk-3.6-java libswt-gtk-3.6-java-gcj libswt-gtk-3.6-jni libswt-mozilla-gtk-3.6-jni libswt-webkit-gtk

[Torsten Werner]

tags 635396 + moreinfo
thanks

Hi Andrew,

Am 25.07.2011 20:39, schrieb Andrew Ross:
 Please remove the following binary packages which are no longer built
 from source package swt-gtk. They have been renamed to remove the .6 
 to avoid the need for future deletions for version 3.x packages.
 
 libswt-cairo-gtk-3.6-jni
 libswt-glx-gtk-3.6-jni
 libswt-gnome-gtk-3.6-jni
 libswt-gtk-3.6-java
 libswt-gtk-3.6-java-gcj
 libswt-gtk-3.6-jni
 libswt-mozilla-gtk-3.6-jni
 libswt-webkit-gtk-3.6-jni

there are reversed dependencies. Do you plan to take care of them?

# Broken Depends:
tuxguitar: tuxguitar

# Broken Build-Depends:
libjogl2-java: libswt-gtk-3.6-java
libmiglayout-java: libswt-gtk-3.6-java
tuxguitar: libswt-gtk-3.6-java

Cheers,
Torsten

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#630720: sat4j: Please update to 2.3.0

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 severity 631382 serious
Bug #631382 [eclipse] [eclipse] New upstream version: 3.7 Indigo
Severity set to 'serious' from 'wishlist'

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
631382: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=631382
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Processed: eclipse-cdt: still not fixed

[Niels Thykier]

submitter 574611 infini...@gmx.com
thanks

On 2011-07-02 23:12, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
 Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
 
 unarchive 574611
 Bug #574611 {Done: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net} [eclipse-cdt] 
 eclipse-cdt: Does not show up anywhere in Eclipse
 Unarchived Bug 574611
 reopen 574611
 Bug #574611 {Done: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net} [eclipse-cdt] 
 eclipse-cdt: Does not show up anywhere in Eclipse
 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
 you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
 found 574611 6.0.2-1
 Bug #574611 [eclipse-cdt] eclipse-cdt: Does not show up anywhere in Eclipse
 Bug Marked as found in versions eclipse-cdt/6.0.2-1.
 thanks
 Stopping processing here.
 
 Please contact me if you need assistance.

Hey,

Are you perhaps suffering from #587657?  If not, please include the
version of eclipse-cdt and eclipse-platform.

~Niels


__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Processed: eclipse-cdt: still not fixed

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 submitter 574611 infini...@gmx.com
Bug #574611 [eclipse-cdt] eclipse-cdt: Does not show up anywhere in Eclipse
Changed Bug submitter to 'infini...@gmx.com' from 'Sam Morris 
s...@robots.org.uk'
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
574611: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=574611
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: libxerces2-java: Depends-line broken due to hidden special character

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 612124 + moreinfo
Bug #612124 [libxerces2-java] libxerces2-java: Depends-line broken due to 
hidden special character
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
 severity 612124 important
Bug #612124 [libxerces2-java] libxerces2-java: Depends-line broken due to 
hidden special character
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'

 quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
612124: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612124
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: more about Zookeeper

[Neil Williams]

On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 22:07:30 -0300
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org wrote:

 On Sun, 12 Jun 2011, Ted Dunning wrote:
   Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com writes:
   There has been a bit of talk about Apache Zookeeper recently by Thomas
   Koch.  He has a bad opinion of Zookeeper and things it is not good
   enough for Debian.
  
   Could you please provide a reference?
  
  How about this: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/06/msg00316.html
 
 Ah, now I understand the whole deal better.

It's making some more sense to me too.

 I won't judge zookeeper, but it is pretty clear it is about to be
 orphaned, and that it needs a new team maintaining the Debian package if
 it is to remain in Debian.
 
 It *is* too complex a package, it is not the kind of thing to foster on
 Debian QA.  It will have to be dropped if a new maintainer doesn't step up
 eventually.

As outlined in Henrique's previous post, the first thing which any new
maintainer team (and I do think it needs to be a team) must do is fix
the FTBFS bug. Eventually isn't good enough IMHO. I agree with
Henrique that leaving zookeeper in unstable would be OK IF there was an
active maintainer and #626020 was fixed. The package already claims to
be team maintained (pkg-java-maintainers) but nobody from that team has
spoken up here. (CC'd).

#626020 has already been open for a month. If it stays open another
month, I will file a bug for removal of zookeeper from testing. I
don't see any other option.

However, if there is no response from the existing team in the logs for
#626020 before that stage and no new team has shown signs of activity on that
bug report either, then I will seek removal from unstable because the
only real option would be to orphan the package as unmaintained, at
which point removal from unstable becomes inevitable.

Without active maintenance *and* a fix for #626020, there is already
sufficient justification to remove zookeeper from testing and unstable.

If #626020 is fixed by someone who is not willing to maintain it long
term, it's still less than ideal.

If #629856 is fixed without an active team appearing for zookeeper,
there is no reason to keep zookeeper around - even in unstable.

-- 


Neil Williams
=
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/



pgpLZjYvz8bbx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: more about Zookeeper

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 retitle 626020 zookeeper: incorrect dependency information
Bug #626020 [src:zookeeper] zookeeper: FTBFS on mips: The method close() of 
type FileSnap must override a superclass method
Changed Bug title to 'zookeeper: incorrect dependency information' from 
'zookeeper: FTBFS on mips: The method close() of type FileSnap must override a 
superclass method'
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
626020: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=626020
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Bug#628289: geogebra: FTBFS: [javac] /build/user-geogebra_3.2.46.0+dfsg1-1-amd64-cG9nle/geogebra-3.2.46.0+dfsg1/geogebra/main/AppletImplementation.java:1593: cannot find symbol

[Damien Raude-Morvan]

Hi,

Le jeudi 02 juin 2011 15:40:55, Giovanni Mascellani a écrit :
 Some classes disappeared from OpenJDK and I'm trying to understand how
 difficult it would be to have them back again.
 
 The other option is to remove from Geogebra the code depending on
 netscape.javascript.*. Given that Geogebra in Debian is meant to be used
 just as an application, this shouldn't hurt that much. Some work would
 be needed anyway.

There was a split between upstream icedtea (openjdk-* packages) et icedtea-web 
(icedtea-plugin and icedtea-netx packages).

netscape.javascript.* classes are now located inside /usr/share/icedtea-
web/plugin.jar (icedtea-plugin).

Cheers,
-- 
Damien


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#628289: geogebra: FTBFS: [javac] /build/user-geogebra_3.2.46.0+dfsg1-1-amd64-cG9nle/geogebra-3.2.46.0+dfsg1/geogebra/main/AppletImplementation.java:1593: cannot find symbol

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tag 628289 + pending
Bug #628289 [src:geogebra] geogebra: FTBFS: [javac] 
/build/user-geogebra_3.2.46.0+dfsg1-1-amd64-cG9nle/geogebra-3.2.46.0+dfsg1/geogebra/main/AppletImplementation.java:1593:
 cannot find symbol
Added tag(s) pending.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
628289: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=628289
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: startup script choose to use openjdk, ignoring alternatives.

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 526239 pending
Bug #526239 [omegat] omegat: startup script choose to use openjdk, ignoring 
alternatives.
Added tag(s) pending.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
526239: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=526239
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#627712: libcdk-java: XML config files missing from cdk-core.jar

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 627712 upstream
Bug #627712 [libcdk-java] libcdk-java: XML config files missing from 
cdk-core.jar
Added tag(s) upstream.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
627712: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=627712
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#627523: libcdk-java should depend on libstdc++5, so that the InChI part works

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 severity 627523 wishlist
Bug #627523 [libcdk-java] libcdk-java should depend on libstdc++5, so that the 
InChI part works
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal'

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
627523: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=627523
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

RE

[Mark Baker]

I am capt.ken geroge of the US Army base in Iraq for peace keeping i found your 
contact detail in a address journal am seeking your
assistance to evacuate the sum of $5,000,000 to you as long as i am assured 
that it will be safe in your care until I complete my service here
in Iraq. This is not stolen money and there are no danger involved please get 
back to me in my personal email:  
captainkengeo...@yahoo.commailto:captainkengeo...@yahoo.com

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Is any docs for 'felix-main' deb?

[Maverick Crank GRey]

Hello again guys,

Do you mind if I open defects on these issues to let be in touch with
and keep it on track?

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 16:13, Maverick Crank GRey 
maverick.crank.g...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello Damien,
 On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 21:52, Damien Raude-Morvan draz...@debian.org
 wrote:
  Could you include something like readme.txt in your package, please?

  There is some missing components for Apache Felix for it to be really
 useful
  as a full standalone OSGi container.
 Okay. I see.

  AFAIK, we need felix-shell and felix-bundlerepository
  to be able to simply launch java -jar org.apache.felix.main.jar.
 Actually, I cannot confirm that I can run Felix using java -jar
 org.apache.felix.main.jar  =\
 I've got the following output:
 
 ~$ java -jar /usr/share/java/org.apache.felix.main.jar
 ~/.felix/felix-cache/
 No config.properties found.

 Welcome to Felix
 

 Could not create framework: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
 org.apache.felix.framework.FrameworkFactory
 java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
 org.apache.felix.framework.FrameworkFactory
at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:202)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:190)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:307)
at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:301)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:248)
at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)
at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:169)
at org.apache.felix.main.Main.getFrameworkFactory(Main.java:332)
at org.apache.felix.main.Main.main(Main.java:289)
 

 The cause is a behavior of -jar option. See
 http://download.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/tools/windows/java.html
 - When you use this option, the JAR file is the source of all user
 classes, and other user class path settings are ignored.

 I have to fix org.apache.felix.main.jar/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF file a
 little bit adding the following line.
 
 Class-Path: org.apache.felix.framework-2.0.5.jar org.eclipse.osgi.jar
 
 BTW, it looks odd to me use classes from another OSGi framework to run
 Felix. Is it okay for you?

 Unfortunately, even with a fixed manifest I cannot get a Felix
 shell prompt =\
 
 ~$ java -jar /usr/share/java/org.apache.felix.main.jar
 ~/.felix/felix-cache/
 No config.properties found.

 Welcome to Felix
 

 
 Have you any suggestions?

 --
 Be Happy!!!
 UIN ICQ: 9487080
 skype:maverick.crank.grey




-- 
Be Happy!!!
UIN ICQ: 9487080
skype:maverick.crank.grey
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Is any docs for 'felix-main' deb?

[Damien Raude-Morvan]

Yeah,

Go for it : it easier for me to keep an meyer on open issues and work on it 
when I have some free time.

Maverick Crank GRey maverick.crank.g...@gmail.com a écrit :

Hello again guys,

Do you mind if I open defects on these issues to let be in touch with
and keep it on track?

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 16:13, Maverick Crank GRey 
maverick.crank.g...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello Damien,
 On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 21:52, Damien Raude-Morvan draz...@debian.org
 wrote:
  Could you include something like readme.txt in your package, please?

  There is some missing components for Apache Felix for it to be really
 useful
  as a full standalone OSGi container.
 Okay. I see.

  AFAIK, we need felix-shell and felix-bundlerepository
  to be able to simply launch java -jar org.apache.felix.main.jar.
 Actually, I cannot confirm that I can run Felix using java -jar
 org.apache.felix.main.jar  =\
 I've got the following output:
 
 ~$ java -jar /usr/share/java/org.apache.felix.main.jar
 ~/.felix/felix-cache/
 No config.properties found.

 Welcome to Felix
 

 Could not create framework: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
 org.apache.felix.framework.FrameworkFactory
 java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
 org.apache.felix.framework.FrameworkFactory
at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:202)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:190)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:307)
at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:301)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:248)
at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)
at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:169)
at org.apache.felix.main.Main.getFrameworkFactory(Main.java:332)
at org.apache.felix.main.Main.main(Main.java:289)
 

 The cause is a behavior of -jar option. See
 http://download.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/tools/windows/java.html
 - When you use this option, the JAR file is the source of all user
 classes, and other user class path settings are ignored.

 I have to fix org.apache.felix.main.jar/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF file a
 little bit adding the following line.
 
 Class-Path: org.apache.felix.framework-2.0.5.jar org.eclipse.osgi.jar
 
 BTW, it looks odd to me use classes from another OSGi framework to run
 Felix. Is it okay for you?

 Unfortunately, even with a fixed manifest I cannot get a Felix
 shell prompt =\
 
 ~$ java -jar /usr/share/java/org.apache.felix.main.jar
 ~/.felix/felix-cache/
 No config.properties found.

 Welcome to Felix
 

 
 Have you any suggestions?

 --
 Be Happy!!!
 UIN ICQ: 9487080
 skype:maverick.crank.grey




-- 
Be Happy!!!
UIN ICQ: 9487080
skype:maverick.crank.grey
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#626190: freeplane: Menus and submenus have not border lines around

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tag 626190 + wontfix
Bug #626190 [freeplane] freeplane: Menus and submenus have not border lines 
around
Added tag(s) wontfix.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
626190: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=626190
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#619140: Processed: Re: Bug#619140: freemind has an issue with OpenJDK in regard to Xalan

[Eric Lavarde]

# roll-back the mess I did, my deepest apologies!
reassign 619410 roundcube 0.5.1+dfsg-7
retitle 619410 small improvement of /etc/logrotate.d/roundcube-core
fixed 619410 0.5.2+dfsg-1
# re-assign the correct bug:
retitle 619140 OpenJDK keeps FreeMind from using xalan (due to security?)
reassign 619140 openjdk-6-jre 6b18-1.8.7-2~squeeze1
thanks

I deeply apologize for the mess done! I hope this fixes it!

Eric

On 15/05/11 11:50, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:


retitle 619410 OpenJDK keeps FreeMind from using xalan (due to security?)

Bug #619410 {Done: Vincent Bernatber...@debian.org} [roundcube] small 
improvement of /etc/logrotate.d/roundcube-core
Changed Bug title to 'OpenJDK keeps FreeMind from using xalan (due to 
security?)' from 'small improvement of /etc/logrotate.d/roundcube-core'

reassign 619410 openjdk-6-jre 6b18-1.8.7-2~squeeze1

Bug #619410 {Done: Vincent Bernatber...@debian.org} [roundcube] OpenJDK keeps 
FreeMind from using xalan (due to security?)
Bug reassigned from package 'roundcube' to 'openjdk-6-jre'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions roundcube/0.5.1+dfsg-7.
Bug No longer marked as fixed in versions roundcube/0.5.2+dfsg-1.
Bug #619410 {Done: Vincent Bernatber...@debian.org} [openjdk-6-jre] OpenJDK 
keeps FreeMind from using xalan (due to security?)
Bug Marked as found in versions openjdk-6/6b18-1.8.7-2~squeeze1.

thanks

Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.





__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#619140: freemind has an issue with OpenJDK in regard to Xalan

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 # roll-back the mess I did, my deepest apologies!
 reassign 619410 roundcube 0.5.1+dfsg-7
Bug #619410 {Done: Vincent Bernat ber...@debian.org} [openjdk-6-jre] OpenJDK 
keeps FreeMind from using xalan (due to security?)
Bug reassigned from package 'openjdk-6-jre' to 'roundcube'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions openjdk-6/6b18-1.8.7-2~squeeze1.
Bug #619410 {Done: Vincent Bernat ber...@debian.org} [roundcube] OpenJDK 
keeps FreeMind from using xalan (due to security?)
Bug Marked as found in versions roundcube/0.5.1+dfsg-7.
 retitle 619410 small improvement of /etc/logrotate.d/roundcube-core
Bug #619410 {Done: Vincent Bernat ber...@debian.org} [roundcube] OpenJDK 
keeps FreeMind from using xalan (due to security?)
Changed Bug title to 'small improvement of /etc/logrotate.d/roundcube-core' 
from 'OpenJDK keeps FreeMind from using xalan (due to security?)'
 fixed 619410 0.5.2+dfsg-1
Bug #619410 {Done: Vincent Bernat ber...@debian.org} [roundcube] small 
improvement of /etc/logrotate.d/roundcube-core
Bug Marked as fixed in versions roundcube/0.5.2+dfsg-1.
 # re-assign the correct bug:
 retitle 619140 OpenJDK keeps FreeMind from using xalan (due to security?)
Bug #619140 [freemind] freemind: fails to start: Checking Java Version... 
forever
Changed Bug title to 'OpenJDK keeps FreeMind from using xalan (due to 
security?)' from 'freemind: fails to start: Checking Java Version... forever'
 reassign 619140 openjdk-6-jre 6b18-1.8.7-2~squeeze1
Bug #619140 [freemind] OpenJDK keeps FreeMind from using xalan (due to 
security?)
Bug reassigned from package 'freemind' to 'openjdk-6-jre'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions freemind/0.9.0~rc7+dfsg-1.
Bug #619140 [openjdk-6-jre] OpenJDK keeps FreeMind from using xalan (due to 
security?)
Bug Marked as found in versions openjdk-6/6b18-1.8.7-2~squeeze1.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
619140: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619140
619410: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619410
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Slow OO Base performance with high cpu load

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 fixed 619814 6.25-1
Bug #619814 [sun-java6-bin] Slow OO Base performance with high cpu load
Bug #619815 [sun-java6-bin] jre performance drop in OO base
Bug Marked as fixed in versions sun-java6/6.25-1.
Bug Marked as fixed in versions sun-java6/6.25-1.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
619814: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619814
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: FTBFS due to Ant 1.8.1 changes

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 retitle 625767 FTBFS due to changes introduced in recent Groovy versions
Bug #625767 [gradle] FTBFS due to Ant 1.8.1 changes
Changed Bug title to 'FTBFS due to changes introduced in recent Groovy 
versions' from 'FTBFS due to Ant 1.8.1 changes'
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
625767: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=625767
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: blocking bug

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 block 625544 by 625589
Bug #625544 [release.debian.org] [release.debian.org] Transition:  
libmagickcore4, libmagick++4, libmagickwand4
Was blocked by: 625553 625584 625578 625576 625550 625579 625552 625575 625551 
625547 625554 625586 625582 625561 625545 625581 625585 625559 625558 625580 
625556 625573 625549 625583 625557 625574 625560 625546 625577 625548
Added blocking bug(s) of 625544: 625589
 block 625544 by 625592
Bug #625544 [release.debian.org] [release.debian.org] Transition:  
libmagickcore4, libmagick++4, libmagickwand4
Was blocked by: 625553 625584 625579 625550 625576 625578 625575 625552 625554 
625547 625551 625582 625586 625561 625585 625581 625545 625558 625559 625556 
625580 625573 625549 625583 625557 625574 625560 625546 625589 625577 625548
Added blocking bug(s) of 625544: 625592
 block 625544 by 625593
Bug #625544 [release.debian.org] [release.debian.org] Transition:  
libmagickcore4, libmagick++4, libmagickwand4
Was blocked by: 625553 625578 625576 625550 625579 625552 625554 625582 625592 
625561 625585 625580 625573 625583 625557 625574 625546 625577 625584 625575 
625547 625551 625586 625581 625545 625558 625559 625556 625549 625560 625589 
625548
Added blocking bug(s) of 625544: 625593
 block 625544 by 625595
Bug #625544 [release.debian.org] [release.debian.org] Transition:  
libmagickcore4, libmagick++4, libmagickwand4
Was blocked by: 625553 625579 625550 625576 625578 625552 625554 625582 625561 
625592 625585 625580 625573 625583 625557 625574 625546 625577 625584 625575 
625551 625547 625586 625545 625581 625559 625558 625556 625549 625560 625593 
625589 625548
Added blocking bug(s) of 625544: 625595
 block 625544 by 625597
Bug #625544 [release.debian.org] [release.debian.org] Transition:  
libmagickcore4, libmagick++4, libmagickwand4
Was blocked by: 625553 625578 625576 625550 625579 625552 625554 625582 625592 
625561 625585 625580 625573 625583 625557 625574 625595 625546 625577 625584 
625575 625547 625551 625586 625581 625545 625558 625559 625556 625549 625560 
625593 625589 625548
Added blocking bug(s) of 625544: 625597
 block 625544 by 625599
Bug #625544 [release.debian.org] [release.debian.org] Transition:  
libmagickcore4, libmagick++4, libmagickwand4
Was blocked by: 625553 625579 625550 625576 625578 625552 625554 625582 625561 
625592 625585 625580 625597 625573 625583 625557 625574 625546 625595 625577 
625584 625575 625551 625547 625586 625545 625581 625559 625558 625556 625549 
625560 625593 625589 625548
Added blocking bug(s) of 625544: 625599
 block 625544 by 625502
Bug #625544 [release.debian.org] [release.debian.org] Transition:  
libmagickcore4, libmagick++4, libmagickwand4
Was blocked by: 625553 625578 625576 625550 625579 625552 625554 625582 625592 
625561 625585 625580 625573 625597 625583 625557 625574 625595 625546 625577 
625599 625584 625575 625547 625551 625586 625581 625545 625558 625559 625556 
625549 625560 625593 625589 625548
Added blocking bug(s) of 625544: 625502
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
625544: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=625544
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#625617: sun-java6-fonts: fonts should not depend on the jre

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 severity  625617 wishlist
Bug #625617 [sun-java6-fonts] sun-java6-fonts: fonts should not depend on the 
jre
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal'

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
625617: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=625617
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Is any docs for 'felix-main' deb?

[Maverick Crank GRey]

Hello Damien,
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 21:52, Damien Raude-Morvan draz...@debian.org wrote:
 Could you include something like readme.txt in your package, please?

 There is some missing components for Apache Felix for it to be really useful
 as a full standalone OSGi container.
Okay. I see.

 AFAIK, we need felix-shell and felix-bundlerepository
 to be able to simply launch java -jar org.apache.felix.main.jar.
Actually, I cannot confirm that I can run Felix using java -jar
org.apache.felix.main.jar  =\
I've got the following output:

~$ java -jar /usr/share/java/org.apache.felix.main.jar ~/.felix/felix-cache/
No config.properties found.

Welcome to Felix


Could not create framework: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
org.apache.felix.framework.FrameworkFactory
java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.felix.framework.FrameworkFactory
at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:202)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:190)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:307)
at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:301)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:248)
at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)
at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:169)
at org.apache.felix.main.Main.getFrameworkFactory(Main.java:332)
at org.apache.felix.main.Main.main(Main.java:289)


The cause is a behavior of -jar option. See
http://download.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/tools/windows/java.html
- When you use this option, the JAR file is the source of all user
classes, and other user class path settings are ignored.

I have to fix org.apache.felix.main.jar/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF file a
little bit adding the following line.

Class-Path: org.apache.felix.framework-2.0.5.jar org.eclipse.osgi.jar

BTW, it looks odd to me use classes from another OSGi framework to run
Felix. Is it okay for you?

Unfortunately, even with a fixed manifest I cannot get a Felix
shell prompt =\

~$ java -jar /usr/share/java/org.apache.felix.main.jar ~/.felix/felix-cache/
No config.properties found.

Welcome to Felix



Have you any suggestions?

-- 
Be Happy!!!
UIN ICQ: 9487080
skype:maverick.crank.grey

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Is any docs for 'felix-main' deb?

[Damien Raude-Morvan]

Hi Maverick,

Le vendredi 29 avril 2011 12:26:25, Maverick Crank GRey a écrit :
 IANAL and know Debian Policy a little, but could you explain me how
 can I run Felix after 'felix-framework' and 'felix-main' were
 installed. The html page
 (/usr/share/doc/libfelix-main-java-doc/apache-felix-framework-usage-documen
 tation.html) provided by 'libfelix-main-java-doc' deb is not correct for
 your packages.
 Could you include something like readme.txt in your package, please?

There is some missing components for Apache Felix for it to be really useful 
as a full standalone OSGi container. AFAIK, we need felix-shell and felix-
bundlerepository to be able to simply launch java -jar 
org.apache.felix.main.jar.

Regards,
-- 
Damien - Debian Developper
http://wiki.debian.org/DamienRaudeMorvan


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: ZDCARD

[lik]

Dear Sir or Madam
 
Glad to know that you are on the market for packaging. 
 
ZDCARD, as a leading packaging manufacturer, specializes in this field for more 
than 14 years, with top engineers and advanced equipments. 
 
Our products include plastic printed gift box, transparent package, PVC 
packaging box,  PVC card, magnetic stripe card, scratch card, special size 
card, RFID tags.
 
If you have any questions, please just feel free to contact me. 
 
Your early reply is much highly appreciated.
 
Best Regards
 
Jack
Sales Manager
 
Contact Person: Jack
Email: l...@zdcardcn.com
MSN: zdc...@live.com
TEL: 86+18668037865
WEB: www.packaging.hk
 
 
 
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: swt-gtk_3.6.2-1_amd64.changes is NEW

[Ahmed El-Mahmoudy]

Thanks !

-- 
 ‎أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy)
  Digital design engineer
 GPG KeyID: 0xEDDDA1B7
 GPG Fingerprint: 8206 A196 2084 7E6D 0DF8  B176 BC19 6A94 EDDD A1B7


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#593160: libeasymock-java: Please add pom.xml

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 593160 +pending
Bug #593160 [libeasymock-java] libeasymock-java: Please add pom.xml
Added tag(s) pending.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
593160: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=593160
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Bug#620010: oracle-java7: Developper preview available !

[Martin Michlmayr]

Java maintainers, can you please comment on this request (and reassign
the bug).

* mourad newbee...@nativobject.net [2011-03-29 11:25]:
 Package: oracle-java7
 Version: wnpp
 Severity: wishlist
 
 Developper preview is available here : http://download.java.net/jdk7/
 
 It is an RC quality java 7, near the final one !
 
 Could you considere to package it and make it available in experimental repo ?
 
 Thanks for taking care about that issue !
 
 Best Regards
 
 Mourad
 
 
 
 -- System Information:
 Debian Release: wheezy/sid
   APT prefers testing
   APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
 'experimental')
 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
 
 Kernel: Linux 2.6.38-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
 Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
 

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#619986: ClassNotFoundException: AndroidToolkitHandler

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 619986 confirmed
Bug #619986 [libtrident-java] ClassNotFoundException: AndroidToolkitHandler
Added tag(s) confirmed.
 stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
619986: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619986
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Comments regarding your bindex_2.2-1 upload

[Damien Raude-Morvan]

Le Monday 28 March 2011 21:26:20, Ansgar Burchardt a écrit :
 Hi,

Hi Ansgar,

 I noticed an additional copyright holder for
 src/org/osgi/impl/bundle/obr/resource/FilterImpl.java:
 
   (C) 2000 Gatespace AB. All Rights Reserved.
 
 Please include this in your next upload.

Thank. Just fixed that in our Git repository. It will be included in next 
upload to unstable.

Cheers,
-- 
Damien


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: RFS: yui-builder

[Niels Thykier]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

On 2011-03-26 19:44, Michael Gilbert wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I've packaged yui-builder to help solve bug #512915 in yui.  Would
 anyone be so kind as to review and sponsor the upload?
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/y/yui-builder
 
 Thanks,
 Mike
 
 
 __
 This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
 http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
 Please use
 debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
 

Also forwarding this to debian-java@l.d.o

~Niels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=bsUr
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Intent to NMU or help for an l10n upload of hadoop to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs

[Christian PERRIER]

Quoting Thomas Koch (tho...@koch.ro):
 Christian PERRIER:
  Dear Debian maintainer,
  
  (oh no, not him again...)
  
  The hadoop Debian package, which you are the maintainer of, has
  pending bug report(s) which include translation updates or fixes
  for po-debconf, namely bug number 593670 (and maybe other similar bugs).
 Hi Christian,
 
 please don't touch the Hadoop package now. It's in a sorry state and doesn't 
 warrant any further confusion by I18N. It's far behind upstream and I have to 
 discuss, whether the poor code and process quality of upstream really merrits 
 inclusion in Debian.

Hello Thomas, thanks for your answer.

OK. So, even a translation update round wouldn't be helpful as it is
unlikely that a maintainer upload follows. Is that right?

If so, I'll move the package aside from my radar as you suggest.




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Intent to NMU or help for an l10n upload of hadoop to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs

[Thomas Koch]

Christian PERRIER:
 Dear Debian maintainer,
 
 (oh no, not him again...)
 
 The hadoop Debian package, which you are the maintainer of, has
 pending bug report(s) which include translation updates or fixes
 for po-debconf, namely bug number 593670 (and maybe other similar bugs).
Hi Christian,

please don't touch the Hadoop package now. It's in a sorry state and doesn't 
warrant any further confusion by I18N. It's far behind upstream and I have to 
discuss, whether the poor code and process quality of upstream really merrits 
inclusion in Debian.

Best regards,

Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Preserving jre/lib/security/cacerts

[Niels Thykier]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

On 2011-03-21 11:23, Tomas Salfischberger wrote:
 L.S,
 
 I just noticed that Ubuntu replaces JDK_HOME/jre/lib/security/cacerts
 with a symlink to /etc/java-6-sun/security/cacerts, this allows for
 installing updated Java packages without overwriting the cacerts file
 and losing any user-installed certificates. Is there a reason it is not
 done this way in Debian? Or might this be a good feature-request?
 
 Best regards,
 
 Tomas Salfischberger
 
 P.S. I'm not subscribed to pkg-java-maintainers, please CC me in replies.
 
 __
 This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
 http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers.
 Please use
 debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
 

Hey

As far as I can tell we do this with at least sun-java6 (in
sid/testing); but not openjdk-6 (which points to
/etc/ssl/certs/java/cacerts).  Is Ubuntu really using
/etc/java-6-sun/security/cacerts for openjdk-6 as well?

~Niels

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNhzvKAAoJEAVLu599gGRCKE4P/Azwlm619IpO3kfJOWmU+/Kc
SNXBsUekm99ZEGR9plZHwqp2/+Uc/HpXe7VXX0d/pHfgYDtD+WAy8p7jAP8UU8j+
+lAoR08VGuQ0uXKQj79TknCJk6JJAILLKnrH+usDHknQ4pQxYeS5gs7kxHvvhF4X
CsGniJoGzvQR35HPwlATTlpfxfE3IP1Vb7uTA/qJ0x1X0gI1f+kj++SdUV9cGn/c
r2gF88DmOusgGis+OeedHRlL0g1txCxsSiQhKnHMbmTx7pPmG23Ix0Yulp6Q1U6T
pReSP2tSL8nYZObdMsiAWAQdiiqdLR41gVNtgjjUEPjCZd0gupswL9B5NsuZgX6V
Z0LSqxsAs+oQIubx3Ebz52MExAuOMxFHx5qKg252ylCgl7ipja7mW5gOjT7BmkRx
xw0y1n+rvEaozaEISw0Cr54T8cybOrDQiw3Abcb5CHG/3iugE54uoEyfyABMswLo
yfkIRxiWEKaIQnoZLrXQbsHXDkrvacCupysB4lEB6l9kwJDqqgSAYQmR827jEuPi
JNi2y3ejavDaf91GdK5qorSyAuYxDyBCEqKwfx0keyw32oCkrcXSNyYQlgbqCdcE
3zc+/wa49onDwIubd+ndKFLd/SZx9+RaXYdJ4cEuT/1L8EAHKWaWnRFep6Bf2WaI
TM4PehhBU7SvrBuZ7moq
=xJah
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Preserving jre/lib/security/cacerts

[Tomas Salfischberger]

Hi Niels,

I am not sure about openjdk in Ubuntu, but I assume it does not use the 
/etc/java-6-sun/ file as that would be removed when the sun-java6 
pacakges are pruged. Good to read that is has been included in testing 
already, I only checked Lenny and Squeeze and haven't yet upgraded to 
Squeeze.


Tomas



On 03/21/2011 12:51 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

On 2011-03-21 11:23, Tomas Salfischberger wrote:

L.S,

I just noticed that Ubuntu replaces JDK_HOME/jre/lib/security/cacerts
with a symlink to /etc/java-6-sun/security/cacerts, this allows for
installing updated Java packages without overwriting the cacerts file
and losing any user-installed certificates. Is there a reason it is not
done this way in Debian? Or might this be a good feature-request?

Best regards,

Tomas Salfischberger

P.S. I'm not subscribed to pkg-java-maintainers, please CC me in replies.

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers.
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


Hey

As far as I can tell we do this with at least sun-java6 (in
sid/testing); but not openjdk-6 (which points to
/etc/ssl/certs/java/cacerts).  Is Ubuntu really using
/etc/java-6-sun/security/cacerts for openjdk-6 as well?

~Niels

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=xJah
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#619140: freemind: fails to start: Checking Java Version... forever

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tag 619140 +moreinfo
Bug #619140 [freemind] freemind: fails to start: Checking Java Version... 
forever
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
 thank you
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
619140: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619140
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

RE

[victor-aranda]

Your Email won £750,000.00 Pounds in the British Premier Oil Promo:

CLAIMS PROCESSING FORM:

Names:

Location:

Tel:

Sincerely,
Dr. Victor Morris__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed (with 3 errors): Re: Groovy with non-default JRE

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:40:01AM +0100, Philippe Guinot wrote:
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

  I suggest that the 'groovy' need either 'default-jre-headless' or
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

  'java6-runtime-headless' as in Squeeze.
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

 clone 617772 -1
Bug#617772: Groovy with non-default JRE
Bug 617772 cloned as bug 617815.

 reassign -1 libjansi-java
Bug #617815 [groovy] Groovy with non-default JRE
Bug reassigned from package 'groovy' to 'libjansi-java'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions groovy/1.7.8-1.
 retitle -1 libjansi-java: Jansi violates Java policy because it depends 
 unnecessarily on a JRE
Bug #617815 [libjansi-java] Groovy with non-default JRE
Changed Bug title to 'libjansi-java: Jansi violates Java policy because it 
depends unnecessarily on a JRE' from 'Groovy with non-default JRE'
 tag 617772 + pending
Bug #617772 [groovy] Groovy with non-default JRE
Added tag(s) pending.
 tag -1 + pending
Bug #617815 [libjansi-java] libjansi-java: Jansi violates Java policy because 
it depends unnecessarily on a JRE
Added tag(s) pending.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
617815: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=617815
617772: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=617772
-1: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=-1
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#617865: FTBFS due to changes in cglib

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 reassign 617865 cglib 2.2+dfsg-3
Bug #617865 [libhibernate3-java] FTBFS due to changes in cglib
Bug reassigned from package 'libhibernate3-java' to 'cglib'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions libhibernate3-java/3.5.4.Final-5.
Bug #617865 [cglib] FTBFS due to changes in cglib
There is no source info for the package 'cglib' at version '2.2+dfsg-3' with 
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '2.2+dfsg-3'
Bug Marked as found in versions 2.2+dfsg-3.
 affects 617865 + libhibernate3-java
Bug #617865 [cglib] FTBFS due to changes in cglib
Added indication that 617865 affects libhibernate3-java
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
617865: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=617865
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: gtk-look and feel for KDE SC/oxygen

[Niels Thykier]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Hey,

I am just forwarding this to debian-java@l.d.o, which is our debate list
to give it more exposure.

~Niels

On 2011-03-12 01:58, Fabi wrote:
 Hello. I want to ask something. For the KDE SC there is now a gtk theme 
 (oxygen-gtk) available thats ports the oxygen theme to gtk. now we can use 
 this theme with java to but we need to uncomment the file: 
 /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun-1.6.0.24/jre/lib/swing.properties. What i want to 
 ask is, if you can uncomment it so that we have an nicer workflow. like all 
 other, with a gtk-desktop env? 
 
 
 
 __
 This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
 http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
 Please use
 debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=HpgX
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Bug#617438: maven-repo-helper: Typo in package short dependency

[Torsten Werner]

Hi Ludovic,

yes, metadata is correct but the current word is metatada. :)

Cheers,
Torsten

Am 09.03.2011 23:51, schrieb Ludovic Claude:
 
 Hello,
 
 Are you commenting on this short description?
 
 Description: Helper tools for including Maven metatada in Debian
 packages
 
 Metadata is the appropriate term here - data about data. The data is the
 jar/war/ear files. The metadata consists of POM files (Project Object
 Model), and it describes what is contained in those jar files, how to
 build them and how to organize them and their dependencies.
 
 Ludovic
 
 On 08/03/11 23:37, Reuben Thomas wrote:
 Package: maven-repo-helper
 Version: 1.5.1
 Severity: minor

 Actually, I really love the idea of “metatada”, it sounds magic!

 But I don’t think it’s what you meant...

 -- System Information:
 Debian Release: squeeze/sid
   APT prefers maverick-updates
   APT policy: (500, 'maverick-updates'), (500, 'maverick-security'), (500, 
 'maverick')
 Architecture: i386 (i686)

 Kernel: Linux 2.6.35-27-generic (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
 Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

 Versions of packages maven-repo-helper depends on:
 ii  default-jre-headless 1.6-38  Standard Java or Java 
 compatible R
 ii  gcj-4.4-jre-headless 4.4.4-14ubuntu2 Java runtime environment using 
 GIJ
 pn  libstax-java none  (no description available)
 ii  openjdk-6-jre-headle 6b20-1.9.7-0ubuntu1 OpenJDK Java runtime, using 
 Hotspo

 Versions of packages maven-repo-helper recommends:
 ii  debhelper   8.0.0ubuntu1 helper programs for debian/rules

 Versions of packages maven-repo-helper suggests:
 pn  maven-debian-helper   none (no description available)



 __
 This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
 http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
 Please use
 debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
 
 
 __
 This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
 http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
 Please use
 debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: jets3t -- maven artifact installation (was Bug#617533: ITP: jets3t -- Java toolkit for Amazon S3, CloudFront, and Google Storage Service)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tag 617670 + pending
Bug #617670 [libjets3t-java] libjets3t-java: Package does not install maven 
artifacts
Added tag(s) pending.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
617670: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=617670
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Bug#617438: maven-repo-helper: Typo in package short dependency

[Ludovic Claude]

Hello,

Are you commenting on this short description?

Description: Helper tools for including Maven metatada in Debian
packages

Metadata is the appropriate term here - data about data. The data is the
jar/war/ear files. The metadata consists of POM files (Project Object
Model), and it describes what is contained in those jar files, how to
build them and how to organize them and their dependencies.

Ludovic

On 08/03/11 23:37, Reuben Thomas wrote:
 Package: maven-repo-helper
 Version: 1.5.1
 Severity: minor
 
 Actually, I really love the idea of “metatada”, it sounds magic!
 
 But I don’t think it’s what you meant...
 
 -- System Information:
 Debian Release: squeeze/sid
   APT prefers maverick-updates
   APT policy: (500, 'maverick-updates'), (500, 'maverick-security'), (500, 
 'maverick')
 Architecture: i386 (i686)
 
 Kernel: Linux 2.6.35-27-generic (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
 Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
 
 Versions of packages maven-repo-helper depends on:
 ii  default-jre-headless 1.6-38  Standard Java or Java compatible 
 R
 ii  gcj-4.4-jre-headless 4.4.4-14ubuntu2 Java runtime environment using 
 GIJ
 pn  libstax-java none  (no description available)
 ii  openjdk-6-jre-headle 6b20-1.9.7-0ubuntu1 OpenJDK Java runtime, using 
 Hotspo
 
 Versions of packages maven-repo-helper recommends:
 ii  debhelper   8.0.0ubuntu1 helper programs for debian/rules
 
 Versions of packages maven-repo-helper suggests:
 pn  maven-debian-helper   none (no description available)
 
 
 
 __
 This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
 http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
 Please use
 debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#617225: libjsr305-java: Package does not install maven artifacts

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 617225 + pending
Bug #617225 [libjsr305-java] libjsr305-java: Package does not install maven 
artifacts
Added tag(s) pending.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
617225: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=617225
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#614819: RFP: jogl2: only jogl 1.x currently packaged. jogl 2 improves support for OpenGL 3.1+

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 reassign 614819 libjogl-java
Bug #614819 [jogl2] RFP: jogl2: only jogl 1.x currently packaged. jogl 2 
improves support for OpenGL 3.1+
Warning: Unknown package 'jogl2'
Bug reassigned from package 'jogl2' to 'libjogl-java'.
 severity 614819 wishlist
Bug #614819 [libjogl-java] RFP: jogl2: only jogl 1.x currently packaged. jogl 2 
improves support for OpenGL 3.1+
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal'

 --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
614819: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=614819
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Uploading fop 1.0 to experimental

[Sylvestre Ledru]

Hello guys,

Le samedi 17 juillet 2010 à 22:58 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
 Dear package maintainer,
 
 I have uploaded fop 1.0 to experimental:
 
 http://packages.qa.debian.org/f/fop/news/20100717T204721Z.html
 
 I did not make xmlgraphics-commons 1.4 a requirement, the package is
 available on mentors (I am a DM so I cannot upload xmlgraphics-commons
 to experimental):
 
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xmlgraphics-commons/
 
 Please test if you can, and please do report any issue you may find.
Coming back on this subject. 
It is now OK for Jlatexmath with fop 1.0 and xmlgraphics-commons 1.4.

Is there anything blocking fop 1.0 in unstable ?

Sylvestre



__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Uploading fop 1.0 to experimental

[Onkar Shinde]

On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org wrote:
 Hello guys,

 Le samedi 17 juillet 2010 à 22:58 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
 Dear package maintainer,

 I have uploaded fop 1.0 to experimental:

 http://packages.qa.debian.org/f/fop/news/20100717T204721Z.html

 I did not make xmlgraphics-commons 1.4 a requirement, the package is
 available on mentors (I am a DM so I cannot upload xmlgraphics-commons
 to experimental):

 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xmlgraphics-commons/

 Please test if you can, and please do report any issue you may find.
 Coming back on this subject.
 It is now OK for Jlatexmath with fop 1.0 and xmlgraphics-commons 1.4.

 Is there anything blocking fop 1.0 in unstable ?

AFAIK, fop prior to 1.0 needed ant-trax to build which is no more
available with ant 1.8. Please check if fop 1.0 still needs that.

Cheers,
Onkar
-- 
Passion - Some people climb mountains - others write Free software.
Don't ask why - the reason is the same.

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: java debian packages out of date please fix ASAP!

[tony mancill]

Err... 6.24-1 has been available in the archive since February 16th [1].
(Personally, I applaud Sylvestre for the quick turn-around.)  It takes slightly
longer for the updated package to make it into stable, as Debian is a 100%
volunteer organization and the security releases for stable must be coordinated
amongst several teams.

However, there is nothing preventing you from either installing the packages
from testing on your stable system (I don't see anything in the Depends that
should cause an issue on squeeze).  Or, you can easily pull the sources from
either testing or unstable and building a binary package for your desired target
platform.  (I just did a build in a squeeze chroot and it took about 10 minutes,
including downloading the sources.)  Alternatively, if you'd like  *unofficial*
packages built inside a squeeze chroot, you fetch the i386 versions of the
packages from here [2].  Email me privately if you want to go this route and
need amd64.

You can always review the current status of the sun-java6 packages across all of
the Debian releases here [3].

tony

[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/sun-java6/news/20110216T113253Z.html
[2] http://people.debian.org/~tmancill/
[3] http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/sun-java6.html


On 02/21/2011 11:06 AM, UNDERNET AI wrote:
 Greetings,
 
 
 Both JRE and JDK package are out of date latest version is 1.6 update 24
 and your package is currently only on update 22. The latest version
 fixes eight very serious security bugs that do not require
 authentication in order to be exploited. Update 23 that was released
 even earlier before update 24 fixes a dangerous remote denial of service
 flaw that causes a JVM to go into an infinite loop just by sending a
 certain floating point number to the server. Its been 4 days since the
 latest critical update was released yet it still has not been updated.
 Considering that these exploits are very serious I would have expected
 these packages to be updated within 48 hours but this has not happened. 
 
 
 This is NOT acceptable considering that almost all debian and ubuntu
 users rely on these packages to keep the offical oracle java JRE and JDK
 up to date via auto update.
 
 
 Please update these packages ASAP and keep a closer watch on oracle
 updates in future to make sure the vulnerable phase when users do not
 have the latest version is minimized.
 



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: java debian packages out of date please fix ASAP!

[Manfred Moser]

Wow... this a a bit rude to say the least. If you really need to be super
up to date you could
use the upstream package or maybe help with packaging or pay someone to do
it for you..

manfred

 Greetings,


 Both JRE and JDK package are out of date latest version is 1.6 update 24
 and your package is currently only on update 22. The latest version fixes
 eight very serious security bugs that do not require authentication in
 order to be exploited. Update 23 that was released even earlier before
 update 24 fixes a dangerous remote denial of service flaw that causes a
 JVM to go into an infinite loop just by sending a certain floating point
 number to the server. Its been 4 days since the latest critical update was
 released yet it still has not been updated. Considering that these
 exploits are very serious I would have expected these packages to be
 updated within 48 hours but this has not happened.


 This is NOT acceptable considering that almost all debian and ubuntu users
 rely on these packages to keep the offical oracle java JRE and JDK up to
 date via auto update.


 Please update these packages ASAP and keep a closer watch on oracle
 updates in future to make sure the vulnerable phase when users do not have
 the latest version is minimized.


 Thank you.




 __
 This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
 http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers.
 Please use
 debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.



__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: rxtx: rxtx includes sys/io.h on systems where it doesn't exist

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 reopen 609152
Bug #609152 {Done: Scott Howard show...@debian.org} [rxtx] rxtx: rxtx 
includes sys/io.h on systems where it doesn't exist
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
609152: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609152
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: unblocking eclipse-cdt

[Niels Thykier]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Hey

eclipse-cdt was accepted into backports earlier this week (or late the
previous week .).

Enjoy,
~Niels

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=A1EN
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Groovy in Debian

[Miguel Landaeta]

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:12 AM, Russel Winder rus...@russel.org.uk wrote:
 It's great that the version of Groovy packaged in Debian is being
 upgraded from 1.7.4 -- I just received the 1.7.7 accepted into unstable
 notice.  I understand though that there is a critical regression that
 had to be fixed and so 1.7.8 was released yesterday.

 Does the notification of the existence of 1.7.5 in
 http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/groovy.html go away when 1.7.7 goes live
 in unstable?

Hello Russel,

That notification is due an old Groovy package that I prepared and uploaded
to mentors but was never uploaded to the archive. That notification will go away
very soon.

Regarding 1.7.8, Tony Mancill has just uploaded this version to unstable.
Thanks for notifying this to us.

Cheers,

-- 
Miguel Landaeta, miguel at miguel.cc
secure email with PGP 0x7D8967E9 available at http://keyserver.pgp.com/
Faith means not wanting to know what is true. -- Nietzsche

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Groovy in Debian

[Russel Winder]

On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 15:11 -0430, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
[ . . . ]
 That notification is due an old Groovy package that I prepared and uploaded
 to mentors but was never uploaded to the archive. That notification will go 
 away
 very soon.

Splendid.  I suspected it would but was just checking.

 Regarding 1.7.8, Tony Mancill has just uploaded this version to unstable.
 Thanks for notifying this to us.

I got the acceptance notification, so see things have happened nice and
quickly, thanks for responding to my email promptly.

Sending in notes as I did is the trivial bit, it is you people doing
that packaging that do the hard work, thanks for undertaking it.

The JVM eco-system seems to be hard one to handle in Debian -- I guess
because of the jar hell problem.  Presumably this will only get worse
as OSGi and/or Project Jigsaw go into real production so that it is
possible, indeed required, to have multiple versions of jars all loaded
at once.  I assume all the JVM-related packages will have to head
towards being packaged with their version number in the name as GCC is? 

-- 
Russel.
=
Dr Russel Winder  t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Roadm: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: rus...@russel.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: eclipse Helios additional packages

[Niels Thykier]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

On 2011-02-09 14:42, Peter Pearse wrote:
 Hi
 
 Is anyone planning to track
 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=587742 so that
 related packages e.g. eclipse-cdt get bumped to Helios?
 
 Regards (and apologies for ignorance of your planning process)
 
 Peter Pearse
 
 __
 This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
 http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
 Please use
 debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
 

Hey,

All the eclipse packages currently available in Debian are maintained by
the same people, so right now it is automatically tracked. :)
  Other than that it is possible for maintainers (and users) to
subscribe to other packages via the PTS[1] and get email notification
when ever a new version of a package is uploaded (or/and other things).

~Niels

[1]
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/resources.html#pkg-tracking-system

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=C6QF
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#612738: eclipse-platform: Cannot Install Eclipse in Sid (Dependencies)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 severity 612738 serious
Bug #612738 [eclipse-platform] eclipse-platform: Cannot Install Eclipse in Sid 
(Dependencies)
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'

 tags 612738 + confirmed
Bug #612738 [eclipse-platform] eclipse-platform: Cannot Install Eclipse in Sid 
(Dependencies)
Added tag(s) confirmed.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
612738: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612738
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: libapache2-mod-jk: After upgrade from 1.2.26 to 1.2.30 mod_jk no longer connects to tomcats

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 severity 609886 grave
Bug #609886 [libapache2-mod-jk] libapache2-mod-jk: After upgrade from 1.2.26 to 
1.2.30 mod_jk no longer connects to tomcats
Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal'

 tags 609886 - unreproducible - moreinfo + confirmed
Bug #609886 [libapache2-mod-jk] libapache2-mod-jk: After upgrade from 1.2.26 to 
1.2.30 mod_jk no longer connects to tomcats
Removed tag(s) unreproducible.
Bug #609886 [libapache2-mod-jk] libapache2-mod-jk: After upgrade from 1.2.26 to 
1.2.30 mod_jk no longer connects to tomcats
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
Bug #609886 [libapache2-mod-jk] libapache2-mod-jk: After upgrade from 1.2.26 to 
1.2.30 mod_jk no longer connects to tomcats
Added tag(s) confirmed.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
609886: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609886
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#611590: [libwoodstox-java] install POM file

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tag 611590 + pending
Bug #611590 [libwoodstox-java] [libwoodstox-java] install POM file
Added tag(s) pending.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
611590: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611590
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Anybody working on MPJ Express?

[Andreas Tille]

On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 09:00:13AM +0100, Torsten Werner wrote:
 Am 03.02.2011 08:53, schrieb Andreas Tille:
  I'd like to work on some Biological packages written in Java and using
  MPI[1].  As usual these projects simply include everything and I wonder
  whether some of you had possibly prepared some preliminray stuff of this
  library.
 
 may you list the dependencies, please?

I downloaded the zip file from sourceforge[1] (hint: the homepage let you
go through a registration form otherwise) and inspected the lib directory
for jars which seem to be third party via

$ ls mpj-v0_38/lib/*.jar | grep -v /mp
mpj-v0_38/lib/daemon.jar
mpj-v0_38/lib/javax.servlet.jar
mpj-v0_38/lib/loader1.jar
mpj-v0_38/lib/loader2.jar
mpj-v0_38/lib/log4j-1.2.11.jar
mpj-v0_38/lib/mxdev.jar
mpj-v0_38/lib/niodev.jar
mpj-v0_38/lib/smpdev.jar
mpj-v0_38/lib/starter.jar
mpj-v0_38/lib/test.jar
mpj-v0_38/lib/tools.jar
mpj-v0_38/lib/wrapper.jar
mpj-v0_38/lib/xdev.jar

If this does not answer your question please tell me how I can relieably
find out the dependencies.

Kind regards

   Andreas.

[1] http://sourceforge.net/projects/mpjexpress/

-- 
http://fam-tille.de

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Anybody working on MPJ Express?

[Torsten Werner]

Am 03.02.2011 11:29, schrieb Andreas Tille:
 mpj-v0_38/lib/daemon.jar

 mpj-v0_38/lib/javax.servlet.jar

We have several versions.

 mpj-v0_38/lib/loader1.jar
 mpj-v0_38/lib/loader2.jar

 mpj-v0_38/lib/log4j-1.2.11.jar

no problem

 mpj-v0_38/lib/mxdev.jar
 mpj-v0_38/lib/niodev.jar
 mpj-v0_38/lib/smpdev.jar
 mpj-v0_38/lib/starter.jar
 mpj-v0_38/lib/test.jar
 mpj-v0_38/lib/tools.jar
 mpj-v0_38/lib/wrapper.jar
 mpj-v0_38/lib/xdev.jar
 
 If this does not answer your question please tell me how I can relieably
 find out the dependencies.

I've had no time to check the details but there is a contents file at
http://ftp-master.debian.org/users/twerner/jar-content.txt.gz which
might be useful.

Cheers,
Torsten

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Processed: still not fixed

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 reopen 585089
Bug #585089 {Done: Scott Howard show...@debian.org} [librxtx-java] 
librxtx-java FTBFS kfreebsd
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
585089: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=585089
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Bug#543907: Netbeans 6.9 and Dependencies Ready for Upload

[Andres Mejia]

On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Damien Raude-Morvan
draz...@drazzib.com wrote:
 Le jeudi 27 janvier 2011 19:02:47, Andres Mejia a écrit :
 On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Damien Raude-Morvan draz...@debian.org
 wrote:
  When running under a chroot/cowbuilder, got failures during test phase :
 Works for me with sbuild. Must be that pbuilder/cowbuilder doesn't
 sanatize environment variables like sbuild does. I've been using
 sbuild for building packages. DISPLAY is one of the variables that
 don't get passed when building through sbuild, since the buildd
 machines wouldn't have any displays to use.

 I perfectly know that buildd network doesn't provide a $DISPLAY for running
 graphic tools but that's not my point :)

 My question was more : what's purpose of this test and how could this test
 pass if it depends on $DISPLAY settings ?
 (as it seems to pass when I have DISPLAY unset or when DISPLAY is set to an
 existing DISPLAY)

I patched it so it would skip these tests that relied on DISPLAY being
set. I haven't gotten around to reporting it upstream.

 I would try with sbuild. Or you can file a bug against pbuilder/cowbuilder.

 Already done, see http://bugs.debian.org/589687

 Cheers,
 --
 Damien




-- 
Regards,
Andres Mejia

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Fwd: Bug#609886: libapache2-mod-jk: After upgrade from 1.2.26 to 1.2.30 mod_jk no longer connects to tomcats

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 609886 unreproducible
Bug #609886 [libapache2-mod-jk] libapache2-mod-jk: After upgrade from 1.2.26 to 
1.2.30 mod_jk no longer connects to tomcats
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
609886: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609886
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#611138: CVE-2010-4438

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was 
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk).
 usertag 611138 + squeeze-can-defer
Bug#611138: CVE-2010-4438
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: squeeze-can-defer.
 tag 611138 + squeeze-ignore
Bug #611138 [glassfish] CVE-2010-4438
Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
611138: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611138
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#602697: chef: remove from squeeze because of solr (#602697)? (was Re: Bug#602697: chef-solr depends on solr)

[Victor Seva]

2011/1/25 Luca Capello l...@pca.it:
 It's also in lenny (albeit in contrib) so if it were removed then a
 migration path for those users to a replacement would be good.

 Given that chef-solr was not in lenny, the above applies to solr only.
 However, I should say that I do not know at all a good migration path.

 This concern still stands, but given that no one has shown interest in
 implementing this in mostly two months, I would say that we should
 simply remove solr from squeeze.

 For the Release Team: should I file an RM bug or this one is sufficient?

AFAIK solr has been removed already from squeeze.



__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Bug#543907: Netbeans 6.9 and Dependencies Ready for Upload

[Andres Mejia]

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Ludovic Claude
ludovic.cla...@laposte.net wrote:

 About felix-framework: I'm working on getting the original OSGi
 libraries into Debian, and they could be used into felix-framework
 instead of the copies provided by Apache (code is identical).
 My packages are in https://launchpad.net/~ludovicc/+archive/ppa/, and
 they will come into Debian soon.

 Also, there is a lonely libnetbeans-cvsclient-java package, it would be
 great if it could be generated from the most current version of Netbeans.

Netbeans-6.9 ships with a cvs client. I'm guessing they include the
sources from this libnetbeans-cvsclient-java package directly, so
there's probably no need to sync with this extra package.

 Ludovic

 On 24/01/11 23:33, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
 Hi Andres,

 Le lundi 24 janvier 2011 01:19:07, Andres Mejia a écrit :
 I'll have you know that I have finished up work on getting netbeans-6.9 and
 all needed dependencies ready for upload to Debian

 Great work !
 I'm really interrested into getting :
 - updated Netbeans 6.9 package ready
 - finally move from contrib to main

 felix-framework

 I've just reviewed felix-framework.
 I've commited some changes to felix-framework GIT repository like :

     * Add myself as Uploaders.
     * d/copyright: Update to DEP-5 r166 format.
     * d/control: Drop Depends: ${shlib:Depends} as useless for Java package.
     * d/control: Drop Depends: default-jre-headless | java2-runtime-headless
       as a Java library don't need to depends on runtime (Java Policy).
     * d/control, d/rules: Use mh_clean and B-D on maven-repo-helper (= 1.1)

 You might want to review others felix-* packages to replicate those changes
 and to check packages synopsis / long descriptions to be more verbose (like
 Holger Levsen - and Lintian - suggested :)

 Regards,



 __
 This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
 http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
 Please use
 debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


 __
 This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
 http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
 Please use
 debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.




-- 
Regards,
Andres Mejia

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#610320: FTBFS: jug-2.0.0-1 with ant-1.8.1-1 from experimental

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 severity 610320 important
Bug #610320 [jug] FTBFS: jug-2.0.0-1 with ant-1.8.1-1 from experimental
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
610320: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610320
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Re: Bug#609886: libapache2-mod-jk: After upgrade from 1.2.26 to 1.2.30 mod_jk no longer connects to tomcats

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 severity 609886 normal
Bug #609886 [libapache2-mod-jk] libapache2-mod-jk: After upgrade from 1.2.26 to 
1.2.30 mod_jk no longer connects to tomcats
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
609886: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609886
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please 
use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.