Processed: Pending fixes for bugs in the antlr package

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tag 879980 + pending
Bug #879980 {Done: Matthias Klose } [src:antlr] antlr: FTBFS: 
dh: unable to load addon maven-repo-helper
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
879980: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=879980
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#879980: Pending fixes for bugs in the antlr package

[pkg-java-maintainers]

tag 879980 + pending
thanks

Some bugs in the antlr package are closed in revision
99e7ea49eb7e4cd5d9da72ae23bfd6e3979d in branch 'master' by
Matthias Klose

The full diff can be seen at
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/antlr.git/commit/?id=99e7ea4

Commit message:

Import Debian changes 2.7.7+dfsg-9.1

antlr (2.7.7+dfsg-9.1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * Non-maintainer upload.
  * Move maven-repo-helper to Build-Depends. Closes: #879980.

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#873971: Pending fixes for bugs in the antlr package

[pkg-java-maintainers]

tag 873971 + pending
thanks

Some bugs in the antlr package are closed in revision
ea8e83ee6eabc4c4fc44d0f9bc895096ffd09313 in branch 'master' by
Emmanuel Bourg

The full diff can be seen at
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/antlr.git/commit/?id=ea8e83e

Commit message:

Fixed the build failure with Java 9 (Closes: #873971)

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Processed: Pending fixes for bugs in the antlr package

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tag 873971 + pending
Bug #873971 [src:antlr] FTBFS with Java 9 due to -source/-target only
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
873971: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=873971
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: antlr package

[Asheesh Laroia]

On Tue, 13 Jan 2009, Jan Dittberner wrote:

 Hello,

 recently I built a new package (xlwt) depending on a file in antlr (2.x 
 series). When I started work on xlwt one of the Python module team 
 members mentioned in IRC that antlr is not in a good shape too. I looked 
 at antlr during the last days and I have the feeling that the package 
 could really need some care.

 I'm writing to all of you because I want to avoid starting work that may 
 already be in progress. The package page at [1] tells me that there is 
 an uploaded version by Asheesh Laroia at the mentors.debian.net 
 repository [2]. I looked at it and saw that the package fixes the RC bug 
 but doesn't improve it any further.

That'd be awesome to fix up antlr. I only looked at the RC bug, but I'm 
very confused as to why the Debian Java team didn't answer my repeated 
emails about it.

 I'd like to help with the package with reviewing patches fixing lintian stuff
 and looking at the BTS (and hopefully find solutions for bugs). I'm in NM but
 maintain some other packages [3] for a while so I have some experience with
 packaging. Maybe my Java knowledge will be of help too (antlr spits a lot of
 deprecation warnings that should IMHO be reported/fixed in antlr upstream).

 [3] http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=...@dittberner.info

Awesome.

 Should I start working on the package? I could use svn if anybody could 
 add me to the pkg-java team on alioth (my alioth account is 
 jandd-guest). Before starting new work I think the diff between svn 
 trunk and the current uploaded version of antlr has to be committed to 
 svn though.

 I'm CCing antlr Uploaders and Matthias Klose who uploaded the latest 
 antlr version because I don't know wheter you're members of the team's 
 list.

It's not my package, and I'm not in the Java team, but someone should 
do it, and no one else, so it should probably be you!

Also, apparently debian-java is for humans and pkg-java-maintainers is for 
commit mail. I had no idea about this until I just read an email p-j-m. 
(Maybe that explains why no one answered my queries about antlr before.)

-- Asheesh.

-- 
Write yourself a threatening letter and pen a defiant reply.

___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers

antlr package

[Jan Dittberner]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello,

recently I built a new package (xlwt) depending on a file in antlr (2.x
series). When I started work on xlwt one of the Python module team members
mentioned in IRC that antlr is not in a good shape too. I looked at antlr
during the last days and I have the feeling that the package could really need
some care.

I'm writing to all of you because I want to avoid starting work that may
already be in progress. The package page at [1] tells me that there is an
uploaded version by Asheesh Laroia at the mentors.debian.net repository [2]. I
looked at it and saw that the package fixes the RC bug but doesn't improve it
any further.

[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/a/antlr.html
[2] 
http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=antlr

I'd like to help with the package with reviewing patches fixing lintian stuff
and looking at the BTS (and hopefully find solutions for bugs). I'm in NM but
maintain some other packages [3] for a while so I have some experience with
packaging. Maybe my Java knowledge will be of help too (antlr spits a lot of
deprecation warnings that should IMHO be reported/fixed in antlr upstream).

[3] http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=...@dittberner.info

Should I start working on the package? I could use svn if anybody could add me
to the pkg-java team on alioth (my alioth account is jandd-guest). Before
starting new work I think the diff between svn trunk and the current uploaded
version of antlr has to be committed to svn though.

I'm CCing antlr Uploaders and Matthias Klose who uploaded the latest antlr
version because I don't know wheter you're members of the team's list.


Regards
Jan Dittberner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkltElIACgkQXZJ0m2XDVK8AKQCglhEtdB5q6HxBRZr9WJaHppks
ydgAn3W7CqBLRLaZjvLD6qT86DHaIidR
=xehz
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers

Re: Antlr package does not contain python module

[Michael Koch]

On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 02:51:25PM +0530, Suman wrote:
 Hi ,
 
 The antlr package does not contain the python version of antlr. It
 only contains the java version.
 
 Can you please update the package to install the python version also.
 
 Python support has been added recently to antlr.The information for
 installation can be found in the antlr manual.

Thanks for reporting this. Please file a bug report for this.
Reports to mailing lists tend to get forgotten easily.


Cheers,
Michael
-- 
Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath!
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html

Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/

___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers

Re: Antlr package does not contain python module

[Wolfgang Baer]

Michael Koch wrote:

On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 02:51:25PM +0530, Suman wrote:

Python support has been added recently to antlr.The information for
installation can be found in the antlr manual.



Thanks for reporting this. Please file a bug report for this.
Reports to mailing lists tend to get forgotten easily.


There is already a bug open for this
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=308356

Wolfgang

___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers

Re: Antlr package does not contain python module

[Suman]

Hi,

The severity of he bug should be important , because the package to me
is almost useless without the antlr.py for people who are generating
python code.

-Suman

On 10/17/05, Wolfgang Baer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Michael Koch wrote:
  On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 02:51:25PM +0530, Suman wrote:
 Python support has been added recently to antlr.The information for
 installation can be found in the antlr manual.
 
 
  Thanks for reporting this. Please file a bug report for this.
  Reports to mailing lists tend to get forgotten easily.

 There is already a bug open for this
 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=308356

 Wolfgang



___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers