libxmlrpc3-java override disparity

2010-02-20 Thread Archive Administrator
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):

libxmlrpc3-client-java-gcj_3.1.3-1_amd64.deb: package says section is java, 
override says libs.
libxmlrpc3-common-java-gcj_3.1.3-1_amd64.deb: package says section is java, 
override says libs.
libxmlrpc3-server-java-gcj_3.1.3-1_amd64.deb: package says section is java, 
override says libs.


Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database, debug, fonts, gnu-r, gnustep, haskell,
httpd, java, kernel, lisp, localization, ocaml, php, ruby, vcs, video,
xfce, zope.  At this time a script was used to reclassify packages into
these sections.  If this is the case, please only reply to this email if
the new section is inappropriate, otherwise please update your package
at the next upload.

Either the package or the override file is incorrect.  If you think
the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package
so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload.  If you feel the
override is incorrect then please file a bug against ftp.debian.org and
explain why. Please INCLUDE the list of packages as seen above, or we
won't be able to deal with your request due to missing information.

Please make sure that the subject of the bug you file follows the
following format:

Subject: override: BINARY1:section/priority, [...], BINARYX:section/priority

Include the justification for the change in the body of the mail please.


[NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you already filed a bug
and have not received a response yet, please ignore this mail.  Your bug
needs to be processed by a human and will be in due course, but until
then the installer will send these automated mails; sorry.]

--
Debian distribution maintenance software

(This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there
is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by
mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)

___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


libxmlrpc3-java override disparity

2009-10-03 Thread Archive Administrator
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):

libxmlrpc3-client-java-gcj_3.1.2-1_amd64.deb: package says section is java, 
override says libs.
libxmlrpc3-common-java-gcj_3.1.2-1_amd64.deb: package says section is java, 
override says libs.
libxmlrpc3-server-java-gcj_3.1.2-1_amd64.deb: package says section is java, 
override says libs.


Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database, debug, fonts, gnu-r, gnustep, haskell,
httpd, java, kernel, lisp, localization, ocaml, php, ruby, vcs, video,
xfce, zope.  At this time a script was used to reclassify packages into
these sections.  If this is the case, please only reply to this email if
the new section is inappropriate, otherwise please update your package
at the next upload.

Either the package or the override file is incorrect.  If you think
the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package
so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload.  If you feel the
override is incorrect then please file a bug against ftp.debian.org and
explain why. Please INCLUDE the list of packages as seen above, or we
won't be able to deal with your request due to missing information.

Please make sure that the subject of the bug you file follows the
following format:

Subject: override: BINARY1:section/priority, [...], BINARYX:section/priority

Include the justification for the change in the body of the mail please.


[NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you already filed a bug
and have not received a response yet, please ignore this mail.  Your bug
needs to be processed by a human and will be in due course, but until
then the installer will send these automated mails; sorry.]

--
Debian distribution maintenance software

(This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there
is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by
mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)

___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


libxmlrpc3-java override disparity

2009-08-03 Thread Archive Administrator
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):

libxmlrpc3-client-java-gcj_3.1-3_amd64.deb: package says section is java, 
override says libs.
libxmlrpc3-common-java-gcj_3.1-3_amd64.deb: package says section is java, 
override says libs.
libxmlrpc3-server-java-gcj_3.1-3_amd64.deb: package says section is java, 
override says libs.


Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database, debug, fonts, gnu-r, gnustep, haskell,
httpd, java, kernel, lisp, localization, ocaml, php, ruby, vcs, video,
xfce, zope.  At this time a script was used to reclassify packages into
these sections.  If this is the case, please only reply to this email if
the new section is inappropriate, otherwise please update your package
at the next upload.

Either the package or the override file is incorrect.  If you think
the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package
so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload.  If you feel the
override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why.
Please INCLUDE the list of packages as seen above, or we won't be able
to deal with your mail due to missing information.

[NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you replied to one
like it before and have not received a response yet, please ignore
this mail.  Your reply needs to be processed by a human and will be in
due course, but until then the installer will send these automated
mails; sorry.]

--
Debian distribution maintenance software

(This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there
is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by
mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)

___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


Re: libxmlrpc3-java override disparity

2007-12-27 Thread Joerg Jaspert

 please modify the override file to have the section saying 'libs'.
 libxmlrpc3-client-java_3.1-1_all.deb: package says section is libs, override 
 says devel.
 libxmlrpc3-common-java_3.1-1_all.deb: package says section is libs, override 
 says devel.
 libxmlrpc3-server-java_3.1-1_all.deb: package says section is libs, override 
 says devel.


Done.


-- 
bye Joerg
Some NM:
A developer contacts you and asks you to met for a keysign. What is
your response and why?
Do you like beer? When do we meet? [...]


pgpeuOv9ouHIh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers

Re: libxmlrpc3-java override disparity

2007-12-27 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 11187 March 1977, Michael Koch wrote:

 Justification: Java libraries, to the difference of C libraries, are at 
 the same time for runtime and development usage. We consider that it 
 makes more sense to put all Java libraries in 'libs' as 85% of them are 
 already in this section (I've counted :-) ).
 Please file a bug for this against ftp.debian.org. These mails tend to
 get forgotten. Bugs tend to be processed every couple of months.

EWRONG, dont give such advice please.

-- 
bye Joerg
00:00:11 LupusE goebelmeier: http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html -
warum steht hier 'mplayer'? ist das eine whishlist?


pgp8IPaP6q878.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers

Re: libxmlrpc3-java override disparity

2007-10-27 Thread Eric Lavarde
Hi,

please modify the override file to have the section saying 'libs'.

Justification: Java libraries, to the difference of C libraries, are at 
the same time for runtime and development usage. We consider that it 
makes more sense to put all Java libraries in 'libs' as 85% of them are 
already in this section (I've counted :-) ).

Thanks, Eric

Debian Installer wrote:
 There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
 override file for the following file(s):
 
 libxmlrpc3-client-java_3.1-1_all.deb: package says section is libs, override 
 says devel.
 libxmlrpc3-common-java_3.1-1_all.deb: package says section is libs, override 
 says devel.
 libxmlrpc3-server-java_3.1-1_all.deb: package says section is libs, override 
 says devel.
 
 Either the package or the override file is incorrect.  If you think
 the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package
 so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload.  If you feel the
 override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why.
 


-- 
Gewalt ist die letzte Zuflucht der Inkompetenz.
 Violence is the Last Resort of the Incompetent.
 Gwalt jest ostatnem schronieniem niekompetencji.
 La violence est le dernier refuge de l'incompetence.
 ~ Isaac Asimov

___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


libxmlrpc3-java override disparity

2007-10-26 Thread Debian Installer
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):

libxmlrpc3-client-java_3.1-1_all.deb: package says section is libs, override 
says devel.
libxmlrpc3-common-java_3.1-1_all.deb: package says section is libs, override 
says devel.
libxmlrpc3-server-java_3.1-1_all.deb: package says section is libs, override 
says devel.

Either the package or the override file is incorrect.  If you think
the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package
so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload.  If you feel the
override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why.

[NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you replied to one
like it before and have not received a response yet, please ignore
this mail.  Your reply needs to be processed by a human and will be in
due course, but until then the installer will send these automated
mails; sorry.]

--
Debian distribution maintenance software

(This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there
is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by
mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])

___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers