Re: missing VM on eclipse package
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 12:57:02PM -0300, Gonzalo Merayo wrote: dear mantainers I aptgetted: Package: eclipse Priority: optional Section: devel Installed-Size: 416 Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Architecture: amd64 Version: 3.2.1-4 When I run it I get: searching for compatible vm... testing /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj...not found testing /usr/lib/kaffe/pthreads...not found testing /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-sun...not found testing /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-sun...not found testing /usr/lib/j2se/1.5...not found testing /usr/lib/j2se/1.4...not found testing /usr/lib/j2sdk1.5-ibm...not found testing /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-ibm...not found testing /usr/lib/j2sdk1.6-sun...not found testing /usr/lib/j2sdk1.5-sun...not found testing /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-sun...not found I have a: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ java -version java version 1.6.0_02 Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_02-b05) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 1.6.0_02-b05, mixed mode) I guess the problem is that file /etc/eclipse/java_home is missing: /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun Yes, thats the reason. This issue is fixed in unstable, but it never made it into stable. Sorry for that. The workaround is to either add it to /etc/eclipse/java_home yourself. Or as a user put it into JAVA_HOME variable in ~/.eclipse/eclipserc. Cheers, Michael ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#445578: eclipse-gcj depends on ecj-bootstrap-gcj which is obsolete
tag 445578 pending thanks Hello Christoph, On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 04:40:17AM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: Package: eclipse-gcj Version: 3.2.2-3 Severity: normal ecj-bootstrap-gcj is no longer obsolete and described as: standalone version of the Eclipse Java compiler (transitional package) This is a transitional package; it can safely be removed. Thanks for your bug report. This is fixed in our SVN already and will be uploaded as 3.2.2-4 soon. Cheers, Michael ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Processed: Re: Bug#445578: eclipse-gcj depends on ecj-bootstrap-gcj which is obsolete
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 445578 pending Bug#445578: eclipse-gcj depends on ecj-bootstrap-gcj which is obsolete There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#443490: eclipse-sdk: uninstallable on i386
tag 443490 pending thanks Hello Albert, On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 08:12:45PM +0200, Albert Dengg wrote: Package: eclipse-sdk Version: 3.2.2-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable hi because of a buildfailure on i386 (see http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=eclipsever=3.2.2-3arch=i386stamp=1187860160file=log ) currently eclipse-sdk is not installable (eclipse is on 3.2.2-2, but eclipse-sdk is 3.2.2-3 and so there is a dependecy problem (the build failure seems to be something else then in #443485, looks like it took to long to build) Confirmed. Thanks for your bug report. I will upload 3.2.2-4 soon. I will build it for i386 and amd64 on my machine to make sure its built and then upload. This will fix this then. Cheers, Michael ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Processed: Re: Bug#443490: eclipse-sdk: uninstallable on i386
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 443490 pending Bug#443490: eclipse-sdk: uninstallable on i386 There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#443905: File agains gtk?
clone 443905 -1
reassign -1 libgtk2.0-0
retitle 1 GTK crash with tooltips
found -1 2.12.0-2
severity -1 important
tag -1 patch
thanks
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 03:26:58AM +0200, Christian Henz wrote:
I also experienced this, and the patch posted at the Ubuntu link worked for
me.
The bug is already fixed in Ubuntu. Maybe this report should be reassigned to
libgtk2.0-0?
The bug should be cloned to be tracked and known in both. Doing so now.
I have attached the patch that Ubuntu applies to gtk+2.0 to fix this
issue. Please include it in Debian as well.
Cheers,
Michael
--- gtktooltips.c 2007-09-10 18:07:09.0 +0200
+++ gtk+2.0-2.12.0/gtk/gtktooltips.c 2007-09-10 18:08:01.0 +0200
@@ -235,6 +235,7 @@ gtk_tooltips_set_tip (GtkTooltips *toolt
}
if (tooltips-active_tips_data
+ tooltipsdata
tooltips-active_tips_data-widget == widget
GTK_WIDGET_DRAWABLE (tooltips-active_tips_data-widget))
{
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#443905: eclipse: Eclipse crashes when showing tooltip
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 05:24:30PM -0500, Rodrigo Chandia wrote: Package: eclipse Version: 3.2.2-3 Severity: grave Justification: causes non-serious data loss Briefly hovering the mouse on the title tab of a file makes eclipse segfault (using sun's java6 from non-free) It might be related to a similar bug reported for ubuntu: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eclipse/+bug/128232 Thanks for your bug report. I have cloned this bug and notified the GTK maintainers. Cheers, Michael ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Processed: Re: Bug#443905: File agains gtk?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: clone 443905 -1 Bug#443905: eclipse: Eclipse crashes when showing tooltip Bug 443905 cloned as bug 445613. reassign -1 libgtk2.0-0 Bug#445613: eclipse: Eclipse crashes when showing tooltip Bug reassigned from package `eclipse' to `libgtk2.0-0'. retitle 1 GTK crash with tooltips Bug number 1 not found. (Is it archived?) found -1 2.12.0-2 Bug#445613: eclipse: Eclipse crashes when showing tooltip Bug marked as found in version 2.12.0-2. severity -1 important Bug#445613: eclipse: Eclipse crashes when showing tooltip Severity set to `important' from `grave' tag -1 patch Bug#445613: eclipse: Eclipse crashes when showing tooltip There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Processing of libservlet2.4-java_5.0.30-6_amd64.changes
libservlet2.4-java_5.0.30-6_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libservlet2.4-java_5.0.30-6.dsc libservlet2.4-java_5.0.30-6.diff.gz libservlet2.4-java_5.0.30-6_all.deb libservlet2.4-java-gcj_5.0.30-6_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
libservlet2.4-java_5.0.30-6_amd64.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: libservlet2.4-java-gcj_5.0.30-6_amd64.deb to pool/main/libs/libservlet2.4-java/libservlet2.4-java-gcj_5.0.30-6_amd64.deb libservlet2.4-java_5.0.30-6.diff.gz to pool/main/libs/libservlet2.4-java/libservlet2.4-java_5.0.30-6.diff.gz libservlet2.4-java_5.0.30-6.dsc to pool/main/libs/libservlet2.4-java/libservlet2.4-java_5.0.30-6.dsc libservlet2.4-java_5.0.30-6_all.deb to pool/main/libs/libservlet2.4-java/libservlet2.4-java_5.0.30-6_all.deb Override entries for your package: libservlet2.4-java-gcj_5.0.30-6_amd64.deb - optional libs libservlet2.4-java_5.0.30-6.dsc - source libs libservlet2.4-java_5.0.30-6_all.deb - optional libs Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Processing of libcommons-el-java_1.0-4_amd64.changes
libcommons-el-java_1.0-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libcommons-el-java_1.0-4.dsc libcommons-el-java_1.0-4.diff.gz libcommons-el-java_1.0-4_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
libcommons-el-java_1.0-4_amd64.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: libcommons-el-java_1.0-4.diff.gz to pool/main/libc/libcommons-el-java/libcommons-el-java_1.0-4.diff.gz libcommons-el-java_1.0-4.dsc to pool/main/libc/libcommons-el-java/libcommons-el-java_1.0-4.dsc libcommons-el-java_1.0-4_all.deb to pool/main/libc/libcommons-el-java/libcommons-el-java_1.0-4_all.deb Override entries for your package: libcommons-el-java_1.0-4.dsc - source libs libcommons-el-java_1.0-4_all.deb - optional libs Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Closing bugs: 399372 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#399372: marked as done (FTBFS: jthread_unsuspendall: Assertion `val == 0' failed.)
Your message dated Sun, 07 Oct 2007 11:17:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#399372: fixed in libcommons-el-java 1.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: libcommons-el-java Version: 1.0-3 Severity: important Justification: fails to build from source Hi, rebuilding libcommons-el-java under etch fails with [javadoc] Writing HTML files for package org.apache.commons.el.parser kaffe-bin: /build/buildd/kaffe-1.1.7/build-tree/kaffe-1.1.7/kaffe/kaffevm/systems/unix-pthreads/thread-impl.c:1490: jthread_unsuspendall: Assertion `val == 0' failed. /bin/sh: line 1: 25262 Aborted /usr/lib/kaffe/bin/java -classpath /usr/share/ant/lib/ant.jar:/usr/share/ant/lib/ant-launcher.jar:/usr/share/ant/lib/ant-launcher.jar:/usr/share/java/servlet-api.jar:/usr/share/java/jsp-api.jar:/usr/share/java/junit.jar:/usr/lib/kaffe/lib/tools.jar -Dant.home=/usr/share/ant org.apache.tools.ant.Main -Dcompile.debug=true -Dcompile.optimize=true -propertyfile /home/mrvn/build/libcommons-el-java_1.0-3/libcommons-el-java-1.0/debian/ant.properties jar-only javadoc A full build log is attached. MfG Goswin -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-frosties-2 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... The following NEW packages will be installed: ant antlr cdbs debhelper defoma ecj-bootstrap esound-common fastjar file fontconfig fontconfig-config gcj-4.1-base gettext gettext-base gij-4.1 gjdoc html2text intltool-debian java-common junit kaffe kaffe-common kaffe-pthreads libasound2 libatk1.0-0 libaudiofile0 libcairo2 libesd0 libexpat1 libfontconfig1 libfreetype6 libgcj-bc libgcj-common libgcj7-0 libgcj7-jar libglib2.0-0 libgmp3c2 libgtk2.0-0 libgtk2.0-common libice6 libjaxp1.3-java libjpeg62 libmagic1 libnewt0.52 libpango1.0-0 libpango1.0-common libpng12-0 libpopt0 libservlet2.4-java libsm6 libtiff4 libx11-6 libx11-data libxau6 libxcursor1 libxdmcp6 libxerces2-java libxext6 libxfixes3 libxft2 libxi6 libxinerama1 libxrandr2 libxrender1 libxtst6 po-debconf ttf-dejavu ucf whiptail x11-common 0 upgraded, 70 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 52.8MB of archives. After unpacking 136MB of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 http://storage etch/main java-common 0.25 [75.5kB] Get:2 http://storage etch/main kaffe-common 2:1.1.7-4 [8006kB] Get:3 http://storage etch/main libasound2 1.0.13-1 [377kB] Get:4 http://storage etch/main libglib2.0-0 2.12.4-1 [548kB] Get:5 http://storage etch/main libatk1.0-0 1.12.3-1 [80.5kB] Get:6 http://storage etch/main libexpat1 1.95.8-3.3 [64.4kB] Get:7 http://storage etch/main libfreetype6 2.2.1-5 [355kB] Get:8 http://storage etch/main ucf 2.0016 [55.9kB] Get:9 http://storage etch/main libnewt0.52 0.52.2-8 [68.2kB] Get:10 http://storage etch/main libpopt0 1.10-3 [34.4kB] Get:11 http://storage etch/main whiptail 0.52.2-8 [35.3kB] Get:12 http://storage etch/main libmagic1 4.17-4 [277kB] Get:13 http://storage etch/main file 4.17-4 [32.0kB] Get:14 http://storage etch/main defoma 0.11.10 [78.7kB] Get:15 http://storage etch/main ttf-dejavu 2.10-1 [3239kB] Get:16 http://storage etch/main fontconfig-config 2.4.1-2 [138kB] Get:17 http://storage etch/main libfontconfig1 2.4.1-2 [211kB] Get:18 http://storage etch/main libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-7 [113kB] Get:19 http://storage etch/main x11-common 1:7.1.0-5 [317kB] Get:20 http://storage etch/main libxau6 1:1.0.1-2 [7568B] Get:21 http://storage etch/main libxdmcp6 1:1.0.1-2 [11.4kB] Get:22 http://storage etch/main libx11-data 2:1.0.3-2 [154kB] Get:23 http://storage etch/main libx11-6 2:1.0.3-2 [598kB] Get:24 http://storage etch/main libxrender1 1:0.9.1-3 [22.6kB] Get:25 http://storage etch/main libcairo2 1.2.4-4 [394kB] Get:26 http://storage etch/main libaudiofile0 0.2.6-6 [82.3kB] Get:27 http://storage etch/main esound-common 0.2.36-3 [38.2kB] Get:28 http://storage etch/main libesd0 0.2.36-3 [20.0kB] Get:29 http://storage etch/main libgmp3c2 2:4.2.1+dfsg-4 [405kB] Get:30 http://storage etch/main libgtk2.0-common 2.8.20-3 [3754kB] Get:31 http://storage etch/main libjpeg62 6b-13 [89.3kB] Get:32 http://storage etch/main fontconfig 2.4.1-2 [132kB] Get:33 http://storage etch/main libpango1.0-common 1.14.7-1 [6618B] Get:34 http://storage etch/main libxft2 2.1.8.2-8 [47.2kB] Get:35
Bug#425064: bug is still present
Any news here? The bug is still present. :( regards, -mika- ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#445119: This package is two years old
Arnaud Vandyck a écrit : On 10/3/07, Encolpe Degoute [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Julien Cristau a écrit : You'll need some justification if you want to make this a critical bug. The whole system doesn't get broken just because this particular package is a bit old. The goal was to awake mainteners... It seems to work. No it doesn't, I don't consider this bug serious and I merge it with two other bugs that were asking for new upstream. When you'll have your head in the build system and the hell dependencies, maybe you'll understand how a pain it is to package argouml. See the mdr license and source problem for example. As see with argouml developers, 0.24 is not compilable for now and there's no maintenance branch for it, only a unstable development branch. Can you envisage to drop argouml out of Debian ? The goal is to remove an outdated and obsolete package. Perhaps in few years we will have an argouml release that would be packagable. Regards, -- Encolpe DEGOUTE http://encolpe.degoute.free.fr/ Logiciels libres, hockey sur glace et autres activités cérébrales ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#445119: This package is two years old
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 02:49:38PM +0200, Encolpe Degoute wrote: Arnaud Vandyck a écrit : On 10/3/07, Encolpe Degoute [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Julien Cristau a écrit : You'll need some justification if you want to make this a critical bug. The whole system doesn't get broken just because this particular package is a bit old. The goal was to awake mainteners... It seems to work. No it doesn't, I don't consider this bug serious and I merge it with two other bugs that were asking for new upstream. When you'll have your head in the build system and the hell dependencies, maybe you'll understand how a pain it is to package argouml. See the mdr license and source problem for example. As see with argouml developers, 0.24 is not compilable for now and there's no maintenance branch for it, only a unstable development branch. Can you envisage to drop argouml out of Debian ? The goal is to remove an outdated and obsolete package. Perhaps in few years we will have an argouml release that would be packagable. How does upstream build argouml when its not buildable according to you? Perhaps using icedtea for building will solve all issues. icedtea will (hopefully) be soon included in Debian. Cheers, Michael ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#445119: This package is two years old
Michael Koch a écrit : On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 02:49:38PM +0200, Encolpe Degoute wrote: Arnaud Vandyck a écrit : On 10/3/07, Encolpe Degoute [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Julien Cristau a écrit : You'll need some justification if you want to make this a critical bug. The whole system doesn't get broken just because this particular package is a bit old. The goal was to awake mainteners... It seems to work. No it doesn't, I don't consider this bug serious and I merge it with two other bugs that were asking for new upstream. When you'll have your head in the build system and the hell dependencies, maybe you'll understand how a pain it is to package argouml. See the mdr license and source problem for example. As see with argouml developers, 0.24 is not compilable for now and there's no maintenance branch for it, only a unstable development branch. Can you envisage to drop argouml out of Debian ? The goal is to remove an outdated and obsolete package. Perhaps in few years we will have an argouml release that would be packagable. How does upstream build argouml when its not buildable according to you? Perhaps using icedtea for building will solve all issues. icedtea will (hopefully) be soon included in Debian. The development branch can be built, but it's not usable for packaging: http://argouml.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=devmsgNo=21295 The build issue for 0.24 can be fix using a part of the development branch (MDR) on which there's a license issue as Arnaud Vandyck said before. Regards, -- Encolpe DEGOUTE http://encolpe.degoute.free.fr/ Logiciels libres, hockey sur glace et autres activités cérébrales ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#445652: [l10n] Czech translation of solr debconf messages
Package: solr Severity: wishlist Tags: l10n, patch Hi, in attachement there is Czech (cs.po) translation of solr debconf messages. Please include it with the package. Thanks -- Miroslav Kure # Czech translation of solr debconf messages. # Copyright (C) YEAR THE PACKAGE'S COPYRIGHT HOLDER # This file is distributed under the same license as the solr package. # Miroslav Kure [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2007. # msgid msgstr Project-Id-Version: solr\n Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] POT-Creation-Date: 2007-10-04 07:18+0200\n PO-Revision-Date: 2007-10-07 16:54+0200\n Last-Translator: Miroslav Kure [EMAIL PROTECTED]\n Language-Team: Czech [EMAIL PROTECTED]\n MIME-Version: 1.0\n Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n #. Type: boolean #. Description #: ../solr-common.templates:2001 msgid Remove Solr index files? msgstr Odstranit indexové soubory Solr? #. Type: boolean #. Description #: ../solr-common.templates:2001 msgid The Solr data directory (/var/lib/solr), and the index files it contains, may be removed while purging the package. msgstr Při vyčištění balíku ze systému se může smazat také datový adresář Solr (/var/lib/solr) a indexové soubory v něm obsažené. #. Type: boolean #. Description #: ../solr-common.templates:2001 msgid You should not choose this option if you intend to re-use Solr's index files later. msgstr Plánujete-li v budoucnu znovupoužít indexové soubory Solr, tuto možnost zamítněte. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#445119: This package is two years old
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 03:58:22PM +0200, Encolpe Degoute wrote: Michael Koch a écrit : On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 02:49:38PM +0200, Encolpe Degoute wrote: Arnaud Vandyck a écrit : On 10/3/07, Encolpe Degoute [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Julien Cristau a écrit : You'll need some justification if you want to make this a critical bug. The whole system doesn't get broken just because this particular package is a bit old. The goal was to awake mainteners... It seems to work. No it doesn't, I don't consider this bug serious and I merge it with two other bugs that were asking for new upstream. When you'll have your head in the build system and the hell dependencies, maybe you'll understand how a pain it is to package argouml. See the mdr license and source problem for example. As see with argouml developers, 0.24 is not compilable for now and there's no maintenance branch for it, only a unstable development branch. Can you envisage to drop argouml out of Debian ? The goal is to remove an outdated and obsolete package. Perhaps in few years we will have an argouml release that would be packagable. How does upstream build argouml when its not buildable according to you? Perhaps using icedtea for building will solve all issues. icedtea will (hopefully) be soon included in Debian. The development branch can be built, but it's not usable for packaging: http://argouml.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=devmsgNo=21295 The build issue for 0.24 can be fix using a part of the development branch (MDR) on which there's a license issue as Arnaud Vandyck said before. Then its perhaps best to file two bugs, one against ftp.debian.org to remove argouml from testing and another against argouml to prevent argouml from migrating into testing again. Then we can update argouml in unstable when its ready to do so. Cheers, Michael ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#445119: This package is two years old
On Sun, Oct 7, 2007 at 20:15:55 +0200, Michael Koch wrote: Then its perhaps best to file two bugs, one against ftp.debian.org to remove argouml from testing and another against argouml to prevent argouml from migrating into testing again. Then we can update argouml in unstable when its ready to do so. Removals from testing are done by the release team, not the ftp masters, so once there's an RC bug filed against argouml you can just ask for its removal on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cheers, Julien ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#445703: javax-servletapi2.3: FTBFS: Unable to find a javac compiler
Package: javax-servletapi2.3 Version: 4.0-8 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... BUILD FAILED /tmp/buildd/javax-servletapi2.3-4.0/build.xml:62: Unable to find a javac compiler; com.sun.tools.javac.Main is not on the classpath. Perhaps JAVA_HOME does not point to the JDK. It is currently set to /usr/lib/kaffe/pthreads/jre Total time: 2 seconds make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1 -- Daniel Schepler ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Processed: setting package to solr solr-common solr-jetty solr-tomcat5.5, tagging 443382, tagging 445284 ... ... ...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.9 package solr solr-common solr-jetty solr-tomcat5.5 Ignoring bugs not assigned to: solr-common solr-tomcat5.5 solr-jetty solr tags 443382 + pending Bug#443382: solr-tomcat5.5: Solr app does not start: Exception starting filter SolrRequestFilter There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tags 445284 + pending Bug#445284: [INTL:ta] debconf PO translations for the package solr There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tags 445351 + pending Bug#445351: solr: [INTL:pt] Updated Portuguese translation for debconf messages Tags were: l10n patch Tags added: pending tags 445652 + pending Bug#445652: [l10n] Czech translation of solr debconf messages Tags were: l10n patch Tags added: pending tags 445701 + pending Bug#445701: [INTL:fi] Finnish translation of the debconf templates Tags were: l10n patch Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
libjfreechart-java 1.0.6-1 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the libjfreechart-java source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.0.2-3 Current version: 1.0.6-1 -- This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
jline 0.9.91-1 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the jline source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.9.5-3 Current version: 0.9.91-1 -- This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
