Bug#542162: closed by Ludovic Claude ludovic.cla...@laposte.net (Bug#542162: fixed in maven2 2.2.1-1)
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 12:57 AM, Debian Bug Tracking
Systemow...@bugs.debian.org wrote:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
which was filed against the maven2 package:
#542162: maven2: mvn command fail right after installing the package
It has been closed by Ludovic Claude ludovic.cla...@laposte.net.
Their explanation is attached below along with your original report.
If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a
better one in a separate message then please contact Ludovic Claude
ludovic.cla...@laposte.net by
replying to this email.
I'm sorry to tell that, but there's still some classes compiled in Java 1.6 :
before :
$ find -name *.class -exec file '{}' \; |grep Java 1.6|wc -l
230
now :
$ find -name *.class -exec file '{}' \; |grep Java 1.6|wc -l
205
Tell me if you need me to attach the list of concerned files.
Cheers,
--
Matthieu Baechler
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#542162: closed by Ludovic Claude ludovic.cla...@laposte.net (Bug#542162: fixed in maven2 2.2.1-1)
Hello Matthieu,
Yes, I'd like a list of classes, or at least the packages they belong
to. I have fixed plexus-interpolation and libslf4j-java which were
compiled with Java 1.6 and included in Maven. In my builds, I could not
see any other issues, but if you have older package versions, or if
those packages have been rebuilt recently with openjdk-6, then new
issues may come up.
Thanks,
Ludovic
Matthieu Baechler a écrit :
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 12:57 AM, Debian Bug Tracking
Systemow...@bugs.debian.org wrote:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
which was filed against the maven2 package:
#542162: maven2: mvn command fail right after installing the package
It has been closed by Ludovic Claude ludovic.cla...@laposte.net.
Their explanation is attached below along with your original report.
If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a
better one in a separate message then please contact Ludovic Claude
ludovic.cla...@laposte.net by
replying to this email.
I'm sorry to tell that, but there's still some classes compiled in Java 1.6 :
before :
$ find -name *.class -exec file '{}' \; |grep Java 1.6|wc -l
230
now :
$ find -name *.class -exec file '{}' \; |grep Java 1.6|wc -l
205
Tell me if you need me to attach the list of concerned files.
Cheers,
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Processed: notfound 439725 in antlr/2.7.6-9
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
notfound 439725 antlr/2.7.6-9
Bug #439725 {Done: Michael Koch konque...@gmx.de} [antlr] antlr: New upstream
source (3.01)
Bug No longer marked as found in versions antlr/2.7.6-9.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#540737: libantlr2.7-cil: installation into Mono fails (no strong name)
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 09:44:25PM +0200, Michael Koch wrote: tag 540737 + confirmed thanks On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 09:14:49PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: | Setting up libantlr2.7-cil (2.7.7-11) ... | * Installing 2 assemblies from libantlr2.7-cil into Mono | E: installing Assembly /usr/lib/cli/antlr-2.7/antlr.astframe.dll failed | E: Installation of libantlr2.7-cil with /usr/share/cli-common/runtimes.d/mono failed | dpkg: error processing libantlr2.7-cil (--install): | subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 9 [...] | $ sudo gacutil -i /usr/lib/cli/antlr-2.7/antlr.astframe.dll | Failure adding assembly /usr/lib/cli/antlr-2.7/antlr.astframe.dll to the cache: Attempt to install an assembly without a strong name I observed this when upgrading to -13, but as you can see -11 exhibits the same problem, presumably a long-standing bug exposed by Mono 2.4.2.3. Could you please look into it? I can reproduce this bug. I have currently no idea what the cause of this can be... I think I found the culprit. AssemblyInfo.cs references 'org.antlr.snk' as key file and this key file doesnt exist in the source tarball, so signing fails. Newer versions of Mono reject installation into the GAC for unsigned assemblies. Cheers, Michael ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
reassign 439725 to antlr3
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny6 reassign 439725 antlr3 ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Processed: reassign 439725 to antlr3
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny6
reassign 439725 antlr3
Bug #439725 {Done: Michael Koch konque...@gmx.de} [antlr] antlr: New upstream
source (3.01)
Bug reassigned from package 'antlr' to 'antlr3'.
Bug No longer marked as fixed in versions antlr3/3.0.1+dfsg-1.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Processing of excalibur-logkit_2.0-1_amd64.changes
excalibur-logkit_2.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: excalibur-logkit_2.0-1.dsc excalibur-logkit_2.0.orig.tar.gz excalibur-logkit_2.0-1.diff.gz libexcalibur-logkit-java_2.0-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org) ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
excalibur-logkit_2.0-1_amd64.changes is NEW
(new) excalibur-logkit_2.0-1.diff.gz optional java (new) excalibur-logkit_2.0-1.dsc optional java (new) excalibur-logkit_2.0.orig.tar.gz optional java (new) libexcalibur-logkit-java_2.0-1_all.deb optional java Lightweight and fast designed logging toolkit for Java Excalibur Logkit (previously avalon logkit) is a lightweight, fast, securely designed logging toolkit. It is designed to integrate into existing applications. Logkit is more lightweight than Log4j. Changes: excalibur-logkit (2.0-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Merge from Ubuntu. (Closes: #54) * debian/control - Set maintainer to Debian Java Maintainers. Add myself as uploader. - Add alternate build and runtime dependency on libjboss-j2ee-java as the geronimo package is not present in Debian yet. - Add Vcs-* fields. * debian/rules - Add jboss-j2ee to DEB_JARS. * debian/patches/04_disable_unit_test.patch - Disable a unit test that fails randomly. Override entries for your package: Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 54 Your package contains new components which requires manual editing of the override file. It is ok otherwise, so please be patient. New packages are usually added to the override file about once a week. You may have gotten the distribution wrong. You'll get warnings above if files already exist in other distributions. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
excalibur-logkit_2.0-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: excalibur-logkit_2.0-1.diff.gz to pool/main/e/excalibur-logkit/excalibur-logkit_2.0-1.diff.gz excalibur-logkit_2.0-1.dsc to pool/main/e/excalibur-logkit/excalibur-logkit_2.0-1.dsc excalibur-logkit_2.0.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/e/excalibur-logkit/excalibur-logkit_2.0.orig.tar.gz libexcalibur-logkit-java_2.0-1_all.deb to pool/main/e/excalibur-logkit/libexcalibur-logkit-java_2.0-1_all.deb Override entries for your package: excalibur-logkit_2.0-1.dsc - optional java libexcalibur-logkit-java_2.0-1_all.deb - optional java Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 54 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#506355: marked as done (provide antlr library as a separate package)
Your message dated Mon, 7 Sep 2009 21:52:41 +0200 with message-id 20090907195241.gu2...@quadriga.konqueror.de and subject line closing #506355 has caused the Debian Bug report #506355, regarding provide antlr library as a separate package to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 506355: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506355 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- package: antlr version: 2.7.7-6 severity: minor This package has an java antlr library, some python antlr thing, and a system binary. When other packages just want to make use of the antlr jar by itself, all the other things get pulled in. Please split this package, and provide a libantlr-java, following the java policy in debian. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Hi, Closing this fixed bug for real now. Cheers, Michael ---End Message--- ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Re: RFS: jetty (New upstream release - fixes RC bug)
Hi Ludovic, On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Ludovic Claudeludovic.cla...@laposte.net wrote: I'm pushing back quickly in SVN the fixes I made for the jetty6 package into jetty, can you have a look at them and release them? why do we have a new binary package libjetty-extra package now? What was wrong with libjetty-setuid-java? Cheers, Torsten ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Processing of antlr_2.7.7-14_amd64.changes
antlr_2.7.7-14_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: antlr_2.7.7-14.dsc antlr_2.7.7-14.diff.gz libantlr2.7-cil_2.7.7-14_all.deb antlr-doc_2.7.7-14_all.deb antlr_2.7.7-14_all.deb libantlr-java_2.7.7-14_all.deb python-antlr_2.7.7-14_all.deb libantlr-dev_2.7.7-14_amd64.deb cantlr_2.7.7-14_amd64.deb libantlr-java-gcj_2.7.7-14_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org) ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
antlr_2.7.7-14_amd64.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: antlr-doc_2.7.7-14_all.deb to pool/main/a/antlr/antlr-doc_2.7.7-14_all.deb antlr_2.7.7-14.diff.gz to pool/main/a/antlr/antlr_2.7.7-14.diff.gz antlr_2.7.7-14.dsc to pool/main/a/antlr/antlr_2.7.7-14.dsc antlr_2.7.7-14_all.deb to pool/main/a/antlr/antlr_2.7.7-14_all.deb cantlr_2.7.7-14_amd64.deb to pool/main/a/antlr/cantlr_2.7.7-14_amd64.deb libantlr-dev_2.7.7-14_amd64.deb to pool/main/a/antlr/libantlr-dev_2.7.7-14_amd64.deb libantlr-java-gcj_2.7.7-14_amd64.deb to pool/main/a/antlr/libantlr-java-gcj_2.7.7-14_amd64.deb libantlr-java_2.7.7-14_all.deb to pool/main/a/antlr/libantlr-java_2.7.7-14_all.deb libantlr2.7-cil_2.7.7-14_all.deb to pool/main/a/antlr/libantlr2.7-cil_2.7.7-14_all.deb python-antlr_2.7.7-14_all.deb to pool/main/a/antlr/python-antlr_2.7.7-14_all.deb Override entries for your package: antlr-doc_2.7.7-14_all.deb - optional doc antlr_2.7.7-14.dsc - source devel antlr_2.7.7-14_all.deb - optional devel cantlr_2.7.7-14_amd64.deb - optional devel libantlr-dev_2.7.7-14_amd64.deb - optional libdevel libantlr-java-gcj_2.7.7-14_amd64.deb - optional devel libantlr-java_2.7.7-14_all.deb - optional java libantlr2.7-cil_2.7.7-14_all.deb - optional cli-mono python-antlr_2.7.7-14_all.deb - optional python Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 523051 540737 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#540737: marked as done (libantlr2.7-cil: installation into Mono fails (no strong name))
Your message dated Mon, 07 Sep 2009 22:33:02 + with message-id e1mkmli-x9...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#540737: fixed in antlr 2.7.7-14 has caused the Debian Bug report #540737, regarding libantlr2.7-cil: installation into Mono fails (no strong name) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 540737: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=540737 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: libantlr2.7-cil Version: 2.7.7-11 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable (uninstallable) | Setting up libantlr2.7-cil (2.7.7-11) ... | * Installing 2 assemblies from libantlr2.7-cil into Mono | E: installing Assembly /usr/lib/cli/antlr-2.7/antlr.astframe.dll failed | E: Installation of libantlr2.7-cil with /usr/share/cli-common/runtimes.d/mono failed | dpkg: error processing libantlr2.7-cil (--install): | subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 9 [...] | $ sudo gacutil -i /usr/lib/cli/antlr-2.7/antlr.astframe.dll | Failure adding assembly /usr/lib/cli/antlr-2.7/antlr.astframe.dll to the cache: Attempt to install an assembly without a strong name I observed this when upgrading to -13, but as you can see -11 exhibits the same problem, presumably a long-standing bug exposed by Mono 2.4.2.3. Could you please look into it? Thanks! -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash libantlr2.7-cil depends on no packages. Versions of packages libantlr2.7-cil recommends: ii antlr 2.7.7-13 language tool for constructing rec libantlr2.7-cil suggests no packages. -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: antlr Source-Version: 2.7.7-14 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of antlr, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: antlr-doc_2.7.7-14_all.deb to pool/main/a/antlr/antlr-doc_2.7.7-14_all.deb antlr_2.7.7-14.diff.gz to pool/main/a/antlr/antlr_2.7.7-14.diff.gz antlr_2.7.7-14.dsc to pool/main/a/antlr/antlr_2.7.7-14.dsc antlr_2.7.7-14_all.deb to pool/main/a/antlr/antlr_2.7.7-14_all.deb cantlr_2.7.7-14_amd64.deb to pool/main/a/antlr/cantlr_2.7.7-14_amd64.deb libantlr-dev_2.7.7-14_amd64.deb to pool/main/a/antlr/libantlr-dev_2.7.7-14_amd64.deb libantlr-java-gcj_2.7.7-14_amd64.deb to pool/main/a/antlr/libantlr-java-gcj_2.7.7-14_amd64.deb libantlr-java_2.7.7-14_all.deb to pool/main/a/antlr/libantlr-java_2.7.7-14_all.deb libantlr2.7-cil_2.7.7-14_all.deb to pool/main/a/antlr/libantlr2.7-cil_2.7.7-14_all.deb python-antlr_2.7.7-14_all.deb to pool/main/a/antlr/python-antlr_2.7.7-14_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 540...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Michael Koch konque...@gmx.de (supplier of updated antlr package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 21:44:27 +0200 Source: antlr Binary: antlr libantlr-java libantlr-java-gcj libantlr-dev libantlr2.7-cil cantlr antlr-doc python-antlr Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 2.7.7-14 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: Michael Koch konque...@gmx.de Description: antlr - language tool for constructing recognizers, compilers etc antlr-doc - language tool for constructing recognizers, compilers etc cantlr - language tool for constructing recognizers, compilers etc libantlr-dev - language tool for constructing recognizers, compilers etc libantlr-java - language tool for constructing recognizers, compilers etc (java l libantlr-java-gcj - language tool for constructing recognizers, compilers etc libantlr2.7-cil - language tool for constructing recognizers, compilers etc python-antlr - language tool for constructing recognizers, compilers etc Closes: 523051 540737 Changes: antlr (2.7.7-14)
Re: RFS: jetty (New upstream release - fixes RC bug)
Hi Torsten, libjetty-setuid-java contained both Java and native code, and this caused problems during the builds as highlighted by Thierry Carrez. From Thieery Carrez: Build on i386 succeeded (as it is the one used in the all build) but amd64 fails (missing servlet and slf4j classes...) Ideally the package would be splitted in a way that Java code isn't built as 'any' at all, only C code would ? I have reorganized the packaging to move most of libjetty-setuid-java to libjetty-extra-java, and put the native code into libjetty-extra. Since we decided to migrate jetty to the new jetty6 package, I did not worry too much about backwards compatibility... Ludovic Torsten Werner a écrit : Hi Ludovic, On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Ludovic Claudeludovic.cla...@laposte.net wrote: I'm pushing back quickly in SVN the fixes I made for the jetty6 package into jetty, can you have a look at them and release them? why do we have a new binary package libjetty-extra package now? What was wrong with libjetty-setuid-java? Cheers, Torsten ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
antlr override disparity
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): antlr_2.7.7-14_all.deb: package says section is java, override says devel. libantlr-java-gcj_2.7.7-14_amd64.deb: package says section is java, override says devel. Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the archive: cli-mono, database, debug, fonts, gnu-r, gnustep, haskell, httpd, java, kernel, lisp, localization, ocaml, php, ruby, vcs, video, xfce, zope. At this time a script was used to reclassify packages into these sections. If this is the case, please only reply to this email if the new section is inappropriate, otherwise please update your package at the next upload. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the override is incorrect then please file a bug against ftp.debian.org and explain why. Please INCLUDE the list of packages as seen above, or we won't be able to deal with your request due to missing information. Please make sure that the subject of the bug you file follows the following format: Subject: override: BINARY1:section/priority, [...], BINARYX:section/priority Include the justification for the change in the body of the mail please. [NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you already filed a bug and have not received a response yet, please ignore this mail. Your bug needs to be processed by a human and will be in due course, but until then the installer will send these automated mails; sorry.] -- Debian distribution maintenance software (This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#523051: marked as done (antlr-config --cxxflags doesn't work)
Your message dated Mon, 07 Sep 2009 22:33:01 + with message-id e1mkmlh-x6...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#523051: fixed in antlr 2.7.7-14 has caused the Debian Bug report #523051, regarding antlr-config --cxxflags doesn't work to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 523051: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=523051 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: libantlr-dev Version: 2.7.7-10 The --cxxflags option is advertised in the usage text, but isn't actually understood: m...@rabbit:~$ antlr-config --cxxflags Usage: antlr-config [OPTIONS] [LIBRARIES] Options: [--prefix[=DIR]] [--exec-prefix[=DIR]] [--version] [--libs] [--cflags] [--cxxflags] Libraries: libantlr.a m...@rabbit:~$ echo $? 1 ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: antlr Source-Version: 2.7.7-14 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of antlr, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: antlr-doc_2.7.7-14_all.deb to pool/main/a/antlr/antlr-doc_2.7.7-14_all.deb antlr_2.7.7-14.diff.gz to pool/main/a/antlr/antlr_2.7.7-14.diff.gz antlr_2.7.7-14.dsc to pool/main/a/antlr/antlr_2.7.7-14.dsc antlr_2.7.7-14_all.deb to pool/main/a/antlr/antlr_2.7.7-14_all.deb cantlr_2.7.7-14_amd64.deb to pool/main/a/antlr/cantlr_2.7.7-14_amd64.deb libantlr-dev_2.7.7-14_amd64.deb to pool/main/a/antlr/libantlr-dev_2.7.7-14_amd64.deb libantlr-java-gcj_2.7.7-14_amd64.deb to pool/main/a/antlr/libantlr-java-gcj_2.7.7-14_amd64.deb libantlr-java_2.7.7-14_all.deb to pool/main/a/antlr/libantlr-java_2.7.7-14_all.deb libantlr2.7-cil_2.7.7-14_all.deb to pool/main/a/antlr/libantlr2.7-cil_2.7.7-14_all.deb python-antlr_2.7.7-14_all.deb to pool/main/a/antlr/python-antlr_2.7.7-14_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 523...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Michael Koch konque...@gmx.de (supplier of updated antlr package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 21:44:27 +0200 Source: antlr Binary: antlr libantlr-java libantlr-java-gcj libantlr-dev libantlr2.7-cil cantlr antlr-doc python-antlr Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 2.7.7-14 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: Michael Koch konque...@gmx.de Description: antlr - language tool for constructing recognizers, compilers etc antlr-doc - language tool for constructing recognizers, compilers etc cantlr - language tool for constructing recognizers, compilers etc libantlr-dev - language tool for constructing recognizers, compilers etc libantlr-java - language tool for constructing recognizers, compilers etc (java l libantlr-java-gcj - language tool for constructing recognizers, compilers etc libantlr2.7-cil - language tool for constructing recognizers, compilers etc python-antlr - language tool for constructing recognizers, compilers etc Closes: 523051 540737 Changes: antlr (2.7.7-14) unstable; urgency=low . * Add debian/patches/antlr-cs-signing.patch to sign C# dlls (Closes: #540737). * Add debian/patches/antlr-config.patch to support --cxxflags for antlr-config (Closes: #523051). * Build-Depend on debhelper (= 5) and cli-common-dev (= 0.7). * Make sure DLLs in libantlr2.7-cli are not executable. * Moved source, libantlr-java and libantlr-java-gcj to section java. * Moved libantlr2.7-cil to section cli-mono. * Updated Standards-Version to 3.8.3. Checksums-Sha1: 4122f8cfb5c671fd9d03eb315aeaa3b49907f897 1669 antlr_2.7.7-14.dsc 0a982342b121fc842cc3ad213f6162ab013dd43d 12403 antlr_2.7.7-14.diff.gz a5ad3dd5adc695d0fbc9202d5319e073ca0737c6 47948 libantlr2.7-cil_2.7.7-14_all.deb 901ea750b602e4150c7e42701960b6f8011f4217 891774 antlr-doc_2.7.7-14_all.deb 6bccd80c6db636b0782b76c8a6fbc12916aacc9b 10932 antlr_2.7.7-14_all.deb fe5aa029b34f884140ae765f843c21c69fd61d9e 430744 libantlr-java_2.7.7-14_all.deb 38d2fe5c781cb93f9ae0e844bc327a3f570f165b 23396 python-antlr_2.7.7-14_all.deb ead992a8a2974b49e71823ddc0b0efd9001ea9d7
Processing of libjgrapht0.6-java_0.6.0-8_amd64.changes
libjgrapht0.6-java_0.6.0-8_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libjgrapht0.6-java_0.6.0-8.dsc libjgrapht0.6-java_0.6.0.orig.tar.gz libjgrapht0.6-java_0.6.0-8.diff.gz libjgrapht0.6-java_0.6.0-8_all.deb libjgrapht0.6-java-link_0.6.0-8_all.deb libjgrapht0.6-java-doc_0.6.0-8_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org) ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#505596: FTBFS with GCC 4.4: dereferencing type-punned pointer...
forwarded 505596 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41303 tag 505596 + upstream thanks On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 08:17:08PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: Package: classpath Version: 2:0.97.2-1.1 User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.4 Your package fails to build with the upcoming GCC 4.4. Version 4.4 has not been released yet but I'm building with a snapshot in order to find errors and give people an advance warning. You can reproduce this problem with gcc-snapshot from unstable. Automatic build of classpath_2:0.97.2-1.1 on em64t by sbuild/amd64 0.53 ... cc1: warnings being treated as errors cpnet.c: In function 'cpnet_addMembership': cpnet.c:583: error: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules cpnet.c: In function 'cpnet_dropMembership': cpnet.c:598: error: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules make[4]: *** [cpnet.lo] Error 1 Cheers, Michael ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Processed: Re: Bug#505596: FTBFS with GCC 4.4: dereferencing type-punned pointer...
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: forwarded 505596 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41303 Bug #505596 [classpath] FTBFS with GCC 4.4: dereferencing type-punned pointer... Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41303'. tag 505596 + upstream Bug #505596 [classpath] FTBFS with GCC 4.4: dereferencing type-punned pointer... Added tag(s) upstream. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
