Processed: Re: Bug#589689: transition to libjack-jackd2-0 breaks many packages

2010-07-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 reassign 589689 release.debian.org
Bug #589689 [jackd2] transition to libjack-jackd2-0 breaks many packages
Bug reassigned from package 'jackd2' to 'release.debian.org'.
 stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
589689: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=589689
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Bug#589689: transition to libjack-jackd2-0 breaks many packages

2010-07-20 Thread Reinhard Tartler
reassign 589689 release.debian.org
stop

On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 01:23:27 (CEST), Pedro R wrote:

 Package: jackd2
 Severity: grave
 Tags: sid
 Justification: renders package unusable

 Hi,

 the recent transition to jackd2 causes a mess in my system.

Yes, that is sort-of expected.

 I don't want to downgrade to jackd2.

This doesn't make sense. I assume that you meant jackd1 here.

 After being forced to use it for a couple of months, I find it is much
 more reliable.

Yes, that's why we want to ship it as default jackd flavor in squeeze.
However, we discovered that squeeze is better off with both jackd1 and
jackd2 versions, and have applications compiled against libjack0 from
the jackd1 package.

 If I try to install jackd2 by hand, it forces me to uninstall jackd1 plus 
 loads
 of packages, including
 mplayer, aqualung, alsaplayer, gstreamer-plugins, libpurple, pidgin, libxine,
 xine-ui, vdr plugins
 and many others.

Those packages need to be rebuilt against the updated jackd1 package.
The release team is already on it with scheduling binNMUs. I'm therefore
reassigning this issue to release.debian.org so that we can reuse this
bug for tracking purposes.

please CC pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org in your followups.

-- 
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4



___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Fwd: RFS: Scenic 0.6.0 - Telepresence software for live performances and installations

2010-07-20 Thread Alexandre Quessy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Jonas and the team,

I'm finally managing to put some more time on this. I spent a few weeks
without much Internet access. Meanwhile, we applied you patch upstream
and made a new release. There are issues to fix, though, since we
changed the way the Python is packaged with autotools.

On 10-06-21 12:04 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
 On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:58:47AM -0400, Alexandre Quessy wrote:

 What I know for sure, is that the Python modules are not shipped with
 any Debian package anymore. :(
 
 Yeah, I did not dispute that, and do not even claim to know for sure
 that your attempts are wrong, only that they _seem_ wrong from a quick
 glance.
 
 When the below build problems have been solved or worked around, I can
 actually build some packages and _then_ help figure out how to solve
 above issue.
 

Hmmm. Actually, our release doesn't quit fix these. I guess it's better
to apply patches and then push them upstream. (remove my author hat, and
wear the packager one) You were right about this.

 
 Python scripts are invoked directly, causing default Python to always
 be used, ignoring autotools $(PYTHON) variable.  This is only an
 issue on systems that wants to build for a non-default Python version
 (i.e. not currently a problem with Debian). I believe the best fix is
 to use the autotools-provided $(PYTHON) (and the related python
 prefix variable - I forgot its variable name) to compose the hashbang
 from a .in file of the scripts, instead of the current /usr/bin/env
 python construct.


 Reading the automake manual (#1) I guess it could be $(PYTHON_VERSION).

 #1: http://www.gnu.org/software/hello/manual/automake/Python.html

 Since the scripts have some automake variables already expanded, I
 could put #!/usr/bin/python@@PYTHON_VERSION@@ there, or something
 similar?
 
 I am no expert in autotools, so do not know what is the most proper or
 elegant approach.  I just wanted to point out that to me it seems the
 problem lies somewhere in the autotools files.
 
 If (as is seems) you are not familiar with (Python-specific parts of)
 autotools either, then I suggest looking at other project for
 inspiration on how they do things, and use official documentation only
 for reference and verification rather than as educational tool.
 

I will ask around for help on this.

 
 Python scripts rely on local modules that are a) not declared and b)
 not yet built.  I fixed a) with a patch, but b) still fails.  I
 believe the help2man rules need to depend on module building, and the
 patch then changed to use build dir instead of source dir (which is
 wrong to use in any case).


 I think this is the most critical issue right now.
 
 Indeed: This is what made me give up for now trying to actually fully
 build packages so that I could help figure out how to most properly
 include the Python parts.
 
 
 Help2man calls the Python scripts, which it turn makes Python
 byte-compile the modules with the wrong Python version. (?) To fix
 this, the man page rule in man/Makefile.am should depend on building
 the Python modules.

 What target would that be ? scenic_PYTHON and rtpmidi_PYTHON ?
 
 Sorry - don't know :-( .  But sounds like you are looking in the right
 direction (if that is of any help or at least of some encouragement).
 

Ah! We thought about putting the call to help2man in the make dist
target, not make. We would put them in the tarball, but they would not
be rebuilt when running git-buildpackage. That would solve this issue.
(the *.pyc files are not distributed in the tarball)

 
 Another more annoying issue is that upstream autotools do not use
 AM_MAINTAINER_MODE, causing normal builds to regenerate autotools if
 too old which might happen accidentally, especially when using a
 VCS as we do.  The fix upstream is simple: Add AM_MAINTAINER_MODE to
 configure.am and all should be fine.  Until then we need to do a
 clumsy workaround of preserving upstream autotools and restoring in
 our clean rule.


 I just filled a bug (#2) report upstream about it. It will be in the
 next release.
 

Fixed in upstream 0.6.3.

Ok, so we have two major bugs to fix.
 1) Call help2man in the make dist target and distribute the man pages
in the tarball.
 2) Replace the shebang by the proper Python version

It seems to me that packaging Python stuff is so difficult that it's
what is actually slowing down the whole release of the next stable
Debian. At least, that's my impression reading
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debian#Release_history

Not giving up!

Alex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJMRcnWAAoJEJQ0pOgl2qx1iTUP+wfk66Z0apOjQ+mO84KbU/8U
tNuMD2Vzabzo+aWvQ+m/wgbQGaNJHAPTfN2nx0puWwR7R5AeBehkZVD37kq+BGmM
CfOvznxMrZfiriJZvlrx+sF7uVIciDVbXmh/9oo/XhS/Ps59cHBIx0e4hA+BF7E6
v+U8ufPlD79tZR7Rxyg+4sT5tj/fOWDD0Od+y5RnNCNB/tlVxDOhgac00sUhiMUA

Re: Bug#589689: transition to libjack-jackd2-0 breaks many packages

2010-07-20 Thread Pedro Ribeiro
 I don't want to downgrade to jackd2.

 This doesn't make sense. I assume that you meant jackd1 here.


Yes, that's what I meant.

 Yes, that's why we want to ship it as default jackd flavor in squeeze.
 However, we discovered that squeeze is better off with both jackd1 and
 jackd2 versions, and have applications compiled against libjack0 from
 the jackd1 package.


Can't you run apps compiled against libjack0 with libjack-jackd2-0? That
probaby works, since the interface is the same. Or am I completely off the
mark here?

 Those packages need to be rebuilt against the updated jackd1 package.
 The release team is already on it with scheduling binNMUs. I'm therefore
 reassigning this issue to release.debian.org so that we can reuse this
 bug for tracking purposes.

 please CC pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org in your
followups.

 --
 Gruesse/greetings,
 Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4


Thanks for letting me know, and thank you for your work in Debian.

Regards,
Pedro
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Fwd: RFS: Scenic 0.6.0 - Telepresence software for live performances and installations

2010-07-20 Thread Alexandre Quessy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello again,
I just remebered that the man page bug has been fixed upstream! They are
now distributed with the tarball, and not rebuilt by git-buildpackage.

On 10-07-20 12:07 PM, Alexandre Quessy wrote:
 
 Ok, so we have two major bugs to fix.
  1) Call help2man in the make dist target and distribute the man pages
 in the tarball.
  2) Replace the shebang by the proper Python version
 

We still need to set up the /usr/bin/python2.6 thing.

Also, I have problems with installing the Python modules in the right
package. (the scenic and midistream binary packages are the ones that
contain Python modules. Namely the scenic and midistream modules)

a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=SXIC
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


clalsadrv 2.0.0-3 MIGRATED to testing

2010-07-20 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the clalsadrv source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 2.0.0-2
  Current version:  2.0.0-3

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


mhwaveedit 1.4.19-1 MIGRATED to testing

2010-07-20 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the mhwaveedit source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.4.15-2
  Current version:  1.4.19-1

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


jackeq 0.4.1-2 MIGRATED to testing

2010-07-20 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the jackeq source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.4.1-1
  Current version:  0.4.1-2

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: [SCM] projectm packaging branch, master, updated. upstream/2.0.1+dfsg-50-ge93b6ff

2010-07-20 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 17:42:51 (CEST), ximion-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org 
wrote:

 The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
 commit e93b6ff9e70186f5fafef5e1c3da94d07829872c
 Author: Matthias Klumpp matth...@nlinux.org
 Date:   Tue Jul 20 17:42:18 2010 +0200

 Added get-orig-source script
 
 * Included script to build a DFSG-compliant
   tarball from original upstream tar.

 diff --git a/debian/get-orig-source.sh b/debian/get-orig-source.sh
 new file mode 100755
 index 000..31ac732
 --- /dev/null
 +++ b/debian/get-orig-source.sh
 @@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
 +#!/bin/sh
 +#
 +#  Script to create a 'pristine' tarball for the debian projectM source 
 package
 +#  Copyright (C) 2010 Matthias Klumpp
 +#   based on script by Reinhard Tartler
 +#
 +#  This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
 +#  it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
 +#  the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
 +#  (at your option) any later version.
 +#
 +#  This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
 +#  but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
 +#  MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
 +#  GNU General Public License for more details.
 +#
 +#  You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along
 +#  with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc.,
 +#  51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
 +
 +set -eu
 +
 +usage() {
 + cat 2 EOF
 +usage: $0 [-dh]
 +  -h : display help
 +  -t : original upstream tarball
 +  -o : output tarball name
 +  -v : upstream version
 +  -c : path to cleanup script
 +EOF
 +}
 +
 +debug () {
 + $DEBUG  echo DEBUG: $* 2
 +}
 +
 +error () {
 + echo $1 2
 + exit 1;
 +}
 +
 +set +e
 +PARAMS=`getopt ht:v: $@`
 +if test $? -ne 0; then usage; exit 1; fi;
 +set -e
 +
 +eval set -- $PARAMS
 +
 +DEBUG=false
 +USVERSION=2.0.1
 +
 +while test $# -gt 0
 +do
 + case $1 in
 + -h) usage; exit 1 ;;
 + -t) ORIGTAR=$2; shift ;;
 + -v) USVERSION=$2; shift ;;
 + --) shift ; break ;;
 + *)  echo Internal error! ; exit 1 ;;
 + esac
 + shift
 +done
 +
 +# sanity checks now
 +dh_testdir
 +
 +if [ -z $ORIGTAR ]; then
 + error you need to specify the original upstream tarball!
 +fi

this totally changes the semantics of what I'd expect from a
get-orig-source target. The purpose of the get-orig-source.sh script was
to fetch the source from the internet, while strip.sh is meant to be run
in the temporary directory and is called by get-orig-source.sh.

Please either follow that philosophy or rename the script to something
that matches its intend better in order to avoid future confusion.

thanks.


 +
 +PACKAGENAME=projectm
 +TARBALL=./${PACKAGENAME}_${USVERSION}+dfsg.orig.tar.gz
 +
 +TMPDIR=`mktemp -d`
 +trap 'rm -rf ${TMPDIR}'  EXIT
 +
 +mkdir ${TMPDIR}/${PACKAGENAME}
 +ODIR=`pwd`
 +cd ${TMPDIR}/${PACKAGENAME}
 +tar xzf ${ORIGTAR}
 +cd projectM-complete-${USVERSION}-Source
 +
 +rm -rf ./src/WinLibs
 +rm -rf ./src/macos
 +rm -rf ./src/win32
 +rm -f ./src/projectM-sdlvis/a.out
 +rm -rf ./presets_test
 +rm -f ./INSTALL-iTunes-macos.txt
 +rm -rf ./playlists
 +rm -rf ./src/projectM-iTunes-VizKit
 +rm -rf ./src/projectM-iTunes
 +rm -rf ./src/projectM-moviegen
 +rm -rf ./src/projectM-screensaver
 +rm -rf ./src/projectM-wmp
 +find . -type d -name CVS -exec rm -rf {} +
 +find . -type d -name *~ -exec rm {} +
 +
 +cd ${ODIR}
 +
 +tar czf ${TARBALL} -C ${TMPDIR} ${PACKAGENAME}
 diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
 index 0523ceb..86ee035 100755
 --- a/debian/rules
 +++ b/debian/rules
 @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ BUILD_DIR=$(CURDIR)/src/build
  %:
   dh $@
   
 -.PHONY: override_dh_strip
 +.PHONY: override_dh_strip get-orig-source

is this intentional? I don't see a get-orig-source target here?

  
  override_dh_auto_clean:
   [ ! -f $(BUILD_DIR) ] || $(MAKE) --directory=$(BUILD_DIR) clean
 @@ -37,12 +37,3 @@ override_dh_auto_install:
  
  override_dh_strip:
   dh_strip --dbg-package=projectm-dbg
 -
 -upstream:
 - rm -rf $(CURDIR)/src/WinLibs
 - rm -rf $(CURDIR)/src/macos
 - rm -rf $(CURDIR)/src/win32
 - rm -f $(CURDIR)/src/projectM-sdlvis/a.out
 - rm -rf $(CURDIR)/presets_test
 - find . -type d -name CVS -exec rm -rf {} +
 - find . -type d -name *~ -exec rm {} +

-- 
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: [SCM] projectm packaging branch, master, updated. upstream/2.0.1+dfsg-50-ge93b6ff

2010-07-20 Thread Matthias Klumpp
 [snip]
 
 this totally changes the semantics of what I'd expect from a
 get-orig-source target. The purpose of the get-orig-source.sh script was
 to fetch the source from the internet, while strip.sh is meant to be run
 in the temporary directory and is called by get-orig-source.sh.
 
 Please either follow that philosophy or rename the script to something
 that matches its intend better in order to avoid future confusion.
I cannot fetch the source from web, cause wget can't handle the weird
mirror system of Sourceforge.
I could just fetch the stuff from SVN. I'll rename the script then.

 -.PHONY: override_dh_strip
 +.PHONY: override_dh_strip get-orig-source
 
 is this intentional? I don't see a get-orig-source target here?
It's not. The next commit fixes this too.

Thanks!


___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Fwd: RFS: Scenic 0.6.0 - Telepresence software for live performances and installations

2010-07-20 Thread Jonas Smedegaard

Hi Alexandre (and others following this thread),

On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 12:16:38PM -0400, Alexandre Quessy wrote:
I just remebered that the man page bug has been fixed upstream! They 
are now distributed with the tarball, and not rebuilt by 
git-buildpackage.


On 10-07-20 12:07 PM, Alexandre Quessy wrote:


Ok, so we have two major bugs to fix.
 1) Call help2man in the make dist target and distribute the man 
pages in the tarball.

 2) Replace the shebang by the proper Python version



We still need to set up the /usr/bin/python2.6 thing.

Also, I have problems with installing the Python modules in the right 
package. (the scenic and midistream binary packages are the ones that 
contain Python modules. Namely the scenic and midistream modules)


Do you mean we as upstream or hack it in packaging?


 - Jonas

--
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist  Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Bug#589689: transition to libjack-jackd2-0 breaks many packages

2010-07-20 Thread Adrian Knoth
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 05:13:23PM +0100, Pedro Ribeiro wrote:

  Yes, that's why we want to ship it as default jackd flavor in squeeze.
  However, we discovered that squeeze is better off with both jackd1 and
  jackd2 versions, and have applications compiled against libjack0 from
  the jackd1 package.
 
 Can't you run apps compiled against libjack0 with libjack-jackd2-0? That
 probaby works, since the interface is the same. Or am I completely off the
 mark here?

It works (on the library level), but the packages need to depend on the
newly introduced virtual package libjack-0.116 which is provided by
either libjack0 or libjack-jackd2-0. 

(to be precise, they'll depend on (libjack-jackd2-0 | libjack-0.116),
and that's what the binNMUs are for)


For more information, see the rather lengthy

   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583916

and the even longer discussion on the pkg-multimedia-maintainer mailing
list. (trust me, you don't want to read this, it took us some 200 mails
or more to agree on the right strategy. We now believe we got it right
;) )


HTH

-- 
mail: a...@thur.de  http://adi.thur.de  PGP/GPG: key via keyserver

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Bug#578150: closable?

2010-07-20 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
Hi.

It seems 0.1.1 has been packaged?! Can we close this?


btw: Are you going to incorporate the upstream svn changes?
And are there any plans to package python-pycdio ?


Cheers,
Chris.



___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Bug#578150: marked as done (please package new upstream version 0.1.1)

2010-07-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:54:49 +0200
with message-id 20100720225449.gd5...@jones.dk
and subject line Re: Bug#578150: closable?
has caused the Debian Bug report #578150,
regarding please package new upstream version 0.1.1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
578150: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=578150
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: morituri
Version: 0.1.0-1
Severity: wishlist

Thomas  has kindly sent us the announcement of a new upstream version of
morituri. I'm herby converting it to a wishlist bug. See the attached mail:

---BeginMessage---
This mail announces the release of Morituri 0.1.1 'Dead'.


Morituri is a CD ripper aiming for maximum quality.
 
For more information, see http://thomas.apestaart.org/morituri/trac/
To file bugs, go to https://thomas.apestaart.org/morituri/trac/newticket
morituri is a CD ripper aiming for accuracy over speed.
Its features are modeled to compare with Exact Audio Copy on Windows.

This is morituri 0.1.1 Dead.
This is intended as a release for daring and curious people who've had enough
of the fact that Windows has a more accurate CD ripper than Linux.

Coverage in 0.1.1: 64 %   (1575 / 2440), 61 python tests

Features added in 0.1.1:

- added 'rip image encode' command to encode an image to a lossy codec.
- provided lossy codec profiles for vorbis, mp3, and mp3vbr
- added a complete list of known drive offsets from AccurateRip
- added a generated man page
- better exception handling in tasks
- tag audio files with musicbrainz id's
- added 'rip image retag' command to retag audio files in an image

Bugs fixed in 0.1.1:

-  11: AccurateRip failure on similar URL
-  12: morituri: 'rip -h' shows gstreamer help, not morituri help, but 'rip 
help' works fine.
-  14: AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'name'
-  16: Fatal error passing unescaped unicode strings to GStreamer
-  17: Incorrect file permissions
-  19: Use sortname in filenames

morituri 0.1.1 is brought to you by:

Peter Oliver
Thomas Vander Stichele


___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
---End Message---


-- 
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---

On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:24:39PM +, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:

It seems 0.1.1 has been packaged?! Can we close this?


Ah, yes.  Thanks for noticing.  Closed now.



btw: Are you going to incorporate the upstream svn changes?


No, I currently do not intend to track unreleased code.



And are there any plans to package python-pycdio ?


No concrete plans, no.

But I could probably be convinced to do it - especially if helped a bit: 
First step is to file an ITP.  If you do so, feel free to include me or 
this list as pseudo-cc to the bugreport to remind me/us of it :-)




 - Jonas

--
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist  Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers