Re: pd-zexy (upstream copyright)

2010-08-19 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-08-18 20:38, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
 
 After I stomped the topmost one about source URL (puredata.info was down
 earlier today, apparently), there are now 2 FIXMEs left.
 
 Upper one is obviously a typo, so not a show-stopper.  I would suggest
 you fix it upstream for your next release, though (if not claiming
 copyright in 22nd century is some artistic logo).

ah no, the date is the logo is somewhat inconsistent.
sometimes it reads YYY1:forum::für::umläute:YYY2 (if the copyright spans
YYY1-YYY2), and sometimes it reads DDMM:forum::für::umläute: (if the
file was done on a single day).
in the given case, i will change that to a year range, as it already
covers a time span :-)


 
 Lower one I would appreciate if at least you could clarify - just here
 as an email on this mailinglist, so we have it for the record:
 
 Under which license do Winfried Ritsch license his contributions to
 src/sfplay.c?
 

GPL-2


fgamsdr
IOhannes



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: pd-zexy (upstream copyright)

2010-08-19 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-08-19 10:23, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
 On 2010-08-18 20:38, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:

 After I stomped the topmost one about source URL (puredata.info was down
 earlier today, apparently), there are now 2 FIXMEs left.


ah i was so busy answering your questions, that i forgot to rephrase my
original question (remember, i'm still trying to learn):
how are those FIXMEs to be fixed (apart from your questions).
i mean, can i just edit the debian/copyright file, or do i have to tell
cdbs somehow else how to FIX.
if i add the FIXMEs manually, how do i ensure that the format stays DEP5
compatible?

fgmadrt
IOhannes



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: pd-zexy (upstream copyright)

2010-08-19 Thread Jonas Smedegaard

On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:29:12AM +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:

On 2010-08-19 10:23, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:

On 2010-08-18 20:38, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:


After I stomped the topmost one about source URL (puredata.info was 
down earlier today, apparently), there are now 2 FIXMEs left.




ah i was so busy answering your questions, that i forgot to rephrase my 
original question (remember, i'm still trying to learn):

how are those FIXMEs to be fixed (apart from your questions).
i mean, can i just edit the debian/copyright file, or do i have to tell
cdbs somehow else how to FIX.
if i add the FIXMEs manually, how do i ensure that the format stays 
DEP5 compatible?


CDBS do not automagically maintain debian/copyright.  Instead it 
maintains a shadow file debian/copyright_hints.  At every build, 
source is scanned and a temporary debian/copyright_newhints generated 
and then diff'ed with debian/copyright_hints, and if the first contains 
additions compared to the latter, a warning is emitted (or the build 
fails, if DEB_MAINTAINER_MODE is enabled).


debian/copyright still needs to be maintained by hand.  There is 
not yet any DEP5 validators or parsers, only the work-in-progress 
definition itself, at http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ - so hava a go at 
reading that :-)



For the concrete FIXMEs I suggest we simply release the package as-is, 
and when next upstream release hopefully improves its copyright and 
licensing hints we may be able to sanely remove them.



 - Jonas

--
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist  Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: vlc 1.1.3

2010-08-19 Thread Reinhard Tartler
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to gmane.linux.debian.devel.release as well.

On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 14:10:02 (CEST), Mehdi Dogguy wrote:

 On 19/08/2010 14:00, Benjamin Drung wrote:
 
 It looks ok but I don't see any announce for 1.1.3 yet.
 
 1.1.3 is released now. We have prepared 1.1.2-2 in our git repository. 
 You can find the changes there [1]. Instead of just applying the patch 
 for the security issue, I would prefer to get 1.1.3 into squeeze, 
 because then we could follow upstream's 1.1 branch.
 

 I was already ok for 1.1.3 (according to the diff I analysed). I could
 probably have a look at the released version though.

Might also be worth looking at the upstream changes here:

http://git.videolan.org/?p=vlc/vlc-1.1.git;a=shortlog

The videolan team maintaines -bugfix branches for a limited period of
time, where they backport important fixes like security and other
important changes, but don't allow any new features. I think we do want
to follow this branches, even after release, similar like we do for
mozilla.


-- 
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Bug#593595: cmus: Cmus fails to play any audio files: Error: opening audio device

2010-08-19 Thread C. Morgan Hamill
Package: cmus
Version: 2.3.3-2
Severity: important


Cmus 2.3.3 fails to play any audio files, instead giving one of two
messages. Error: Opening audio device: Internal error displays if I have
output_plugin set to pulse (I do not have the pulse audio server
installed); if I change output_plugin to alsa, then I get the message
Error: opening audio device: No such file or directory instead. This
renders the package completely unusable on my system; stderr and stdout do
not provide me with any further information as to what is going on.

Thank you for any help you can provide (or any instructions you can give
me as to what information I ought to provide you).

Yours, Morgan Hamill
cham...@wesleyan.edu

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages cmus depends on:
ii  libao41.0.0-4Cross Platform Audio Output Librar
ii  libasound21.0.23-1   shared library for ALSA applicatio
ii  libc6 2.11.2-2   Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libfaad2  2.7-4  freeware Advanced Audio Decoder - 
ii  libflac8  1.2.1-2+b1 Free Lossless Audio Codec - runtim
ii  libmad0   0.15.1b-5  MPEG audio decoder library
ii  libmodplug1   1:0.8.8.1-1shared libraries for mod music bas
ii  libmpcdec62:0.1~r459-1   MusePack decoder - library
ii  libncursesw5  5.7+20100313-2 shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libpulse0 0.9.21-3+b1PulseAudio client libraries
ii  libvorbisfile31.3.1-1The Vorbis General Audio Compressi
ii  libwavpack1   4.60.1-1   an audio codec (lossy and lossless

Versions of packages cmus recommends:
ii  cmus-plugin-ffmpeg2.3.3-2lightweight ncurses audio player (

cmus suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages cmus depends on:
ii  libao41.0.0-4Cross Platform Audio Output Librar
ii  libasound21.0.23-1   shared library for ALSA applicatio
ii  libc6 2.11.2-2   Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libfaad2  2.7-4  freeware Advanced Audio Decoder - 
ii  libflac8  1.2.1-2+b1 Free Lossless Audio Codec - runtim
ii  libmad0   0.15.1b-5  MPEG audio decoder library
ii  libmodplug1   1:0.8.8.1-1shared libraries for mod music bas
ii  libmpcdec62:0.1~r459-1   MusePack decoder - library
ii  libncursesw5  5.7+20100313-2 shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libpulse0 0.9.21-3+b1PulseAudio client libraries
ii  libvorbisfile31.3.1-1The Vorbis General Audio Compressi
ii  libwavpack1   4.60.1-1   an audio codec (lossy and lossless

Versions of packages cmus recommends:
ii  cmus-plugin-ffmpeg2.3.3-2lightweight ncurses audio player (

cmus suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages cmus depends on:
ii  libao41.0.0-4Cross Platform Audio Output Librar
ii  libasound21.0.23-1   shared library for ALSA applicatio
ii  libc6 2.11.2-2   Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libfaad2  2.7-4  freeware Advanced Audio Decoder - 
ii  libflac8  1.2.1-2+b1 Free Lossless Audio Codec - runtim
ii  libmad0   0.15.1b-5  MPEG audio decoder library
ii  libmodplug1   1:0.8.8.1-1shared libraries for mod music bas
ii  libmpcdec62:0.1~r459-1   MusePack decoder - library
ii  libncursesw5  5.7+20100313-2 shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libpulse0 0.9.21-3+b1PulseAudio client libraries
ii  libvorbisfile31.3.1-1The Vorbis General Audio Compressi
ii  libwavpack1   4.60.1-1   an audio codec (lossy and lossless

Versions of packages cmus recommends:
ii  

Bug#593595:

2010-08-19 Thread C. Morgan Hamill
Howdy there,

It seems that dsp.alsa.device, mixer.alsa.device, and
mixer.alsa.channel are all unset in the current install of cmus. After
setting the latter to Master or PCM and the former two to
default, as the cmus man page indicates is the common value,
everything works fine.

Yours, Morgan Hamill
cham...@wesleyan.edu



___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Bug#593595: marked as done (cmus: Cmus fails to play any audio files: Error: opening audio device)

2010-08-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:03:02 +0200
with message-id 20100819150302.gy7...@jones.dk
and subject line Re: Bug#593595:
has caused the Debian Bug report #593595,
regarding cmus: Cmus fails to play any audio files: Error: opening audio 
device
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
593595: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=593595
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: cmus
Version: 2.3.3-2
Severity: important


Cmus 2.3.3 fails to play any audio files, instead giving one of two
messages. Error: Opening audio device: Internal error displays if I have
output_plugin set to pulse (I do not have the pulse audio server
installed); if I change output_plugin to alsa, then I get the message
Error: opening audio device: No such file or directory instead. This
renders the package completely unusable on my system; stderr and stdout do
not provide me with any further information as to what is going on.

Thank you for any help you can provide (or any instructions you can give
me as to what information I ought to provide you).

Yours, Morgan Hamill
cham...@wesleyan.edu

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages cmus depends on:
ii  libao41.0.0-4Cross Platform Audio Output Librar
ii  libasound21.0.23-1   shared library for ALSA applicatio
ii  libc6 2.11.2-2   Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libfaad2  2.7-4  freeware Advanced Audio Decoder - 
ii  libflac8  1.2.1-2+b1 Free Lossless Audio Codec - runtim
ii  libmad0   0.15.1b-5  MPEG audio decoder library
ii  libmodplug1   1:0.8.8.1-1shared libraries for mod music bas
ii  libmpcdec62:0.1~r459-1   MusePack decoder - library
ii  libncursesw5  5.7+20100313-2 shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libpulse0 0.9.21-3+b1PulseAudio client libraries
ii  libvorbisfile31.3.1-1The Vorbis General Audio Compressi
ii  libwavpack1   4.60.1-1   an audio codec (lossy and lossless

Versions of packages cmus recommends:
ii  cmus-plugin-ffmpeg2.3.3-2lightweight ncurses audio player (

cmus suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages cmus depends on:
ii  libao41.0.0-4Cross Platform Audio Output Librar
ii  libasound21.0.23-1   shared library for ALSA applicatio
ii  libc6 2.11.2-2   Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libfaad2  2.7-4  freeware Advanced Audio Decoder - 
ii  libflac8  1.2.1-2+b1 Free Lossless Audio Codec - runtim
ii  libmad0   0.15.1b-5  MPEG audio decoder library
ii  libmodplug1   1:0.8.8.1-1shared libraries for mod music bas
ii  libmpcdec62:0.1~r459-1   MusePack decoder - library
ii  libncursesw5  5.7+20100313-2 shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libpulse0 0.9.21-3+b1PulseAudio client libraries
ii  libvorbisfile31.3.1-1The Vorbis General Audio Compressi
ii  libwavpack1   4.60.1-1   an audio codec (lossy and lossless

Versions of packages cmus recommends:
ii  cmus-plugin-ffmpeg2.3.3-2lightweight ncurses audio player (

cmus suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages cmus depends on:
ii  libao41.0.0-4Cross Platform Audio Output Librar
ii  libasound21.0.23-1   shared library 

Bug#590706: same problem with projectm-jack

2010-08-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Can you install the projectm-dbg package and run the application again, to
provide debug information?
Does projectM-pulseaudio work for you?

On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 17:47:20 +0200, 01 f10101...@gmail.com wrote:
 Package: projectm-jack
 Version: 2.0.1+dfsg-3
 Severity: normal
 
 I've got version 2.0.1+dfsg-3 installed. I have the same problem, it
 segfaults.
 
 $ projectM-jack
 dir:/usr/share/projectM/config.inp
 reading ~/.projectM/config.inp
 [projectM] config file: /home/fab/.projectM/config.inp
 No Textures Loaded from /usr/share/projectM/textures
 Erreur de segmentation
 
 Note: of course, I run the jack sound server prior to starting
 projectm-jack.




___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: [SCM] jack-tools packaging branch, master, updated. 164ccb83c7d4ff2677052e6a7fa5147b0328e797

2010-08-19 Thread Felipe Sateler
On 19/08/10 12:38, raboof-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
 The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
 commit 164ccb83c7d4ff2677052e6a7fa5147b0328e797
 Author: Arnout Engelen arnou...@bzzt.net
 Date:   Thu Aug 19 18:37:48 2010 +0200
 
 specify Debian Multimedia Maintainers as package maintainer
 
 diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
 index 95fe97f..a1770fd 100644
 --- a/debian/control
 +++ b/debian/control
 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
  Source: jack-tools
  Section: sound
  Priority: optional
 -Maintainer: Arnout Engelen arnou...@bzzt.net
 +Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers 
 pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
  Build-Depends: debhelper (= 7), quilt, bzip2, dh-buildinfo, autoconf (= 
 2.52), automake1.7, libtool, m4, flex, libjack0.100.0-dev, libsndfile1-dev, 
 libxext-dev, libxt-dev, asciidoc, xsltproc, docbook-xsl
  Standards-Version: 3.8.0
  Vcs-Browser: http://slavepianos.org/rd/r/d/darcsweb.cgi?r=jack.*;a=summary
 

Remember to add yourself as Uploaders

-- 
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Adopting jack-tools

2010-08-19 Thread Arnout Engelen
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 01:13:31AM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote:
 On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Arnout Engelen arnou...@bzzt.net wrote:
  Could you add me to the alioth project so I can check them into git there?
 
 Done, welcome aboard!

Thanks! First version has been uploaded, I'd love to hear your feedback. 
There's probably plenty wrong with it still - one particular thing I'm 
uncertain about is whether I'm using autoconf in a reasonable way here.


Regards,

Arnout

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Bug#590706: same problem with projectm-jack

2010-08-19 Thread 01

Hi,

The problem is, installing this package doesn't bring any new 
informations when starting projectm-jack.
Is there any way to enable debugging ? I checked if files were 
installed, they are.


I tried projectm-pulseaudio (had to install pulseaudio), it segfaults too.


Le 19/08/2010 16:55, Matthias Klumpp a écrit :

Can you install the projectm-dbg package and run the application again, to
provide debug information?
Does projectM-pulseaudio work for you?

   





___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Processed: your mail

2010-08-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 owner 469929 Debian Multimedia Maintainers 
 pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Bug #469929 [wnpp] ITA: jack-tools -- various JACK tools: plumbing, play, udp, 
ctl, scope, clock
Owner changed from Arnout Engelen arnou...@bzzt.net to Debian Multimedia 
Maintainers pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org.

End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
469929: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=469929
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: uploaded first pkg: pd-motex

2010-08-19 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 23:14 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
 On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 02:40:09PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
 
 On Aug 17, 2010, at 11:39 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
 
 On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 05:16:09PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
 On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 15:35:10 (CEST), Hans-Christoph Steiner 
 wrote:
 README.txt and LICENSE.txt are part of the Pd library format.  
 They are part of the library, and the Help Browser (aka the 
 library browser) looks for them to display them.  The library 
 format is basically a directory with files in it, and a subdir 
 called 'examples'.  That install target actually serves to 
 enforce that all the standard files are there.
 
 
 In this library, I could replace the file with a symlink to 
 ../../../ common-licenses/GPL-2, but other libraries might have 
 different licenses so this wouldn't always be the case.
 
 I guess that both the license and the README.txt actually belongs 
 to /usr/share/doc/$package, that's what debian policy tells us to 
 do. IIRC, documentation browsers like dhelp and the default 
 webserver's configurations publish /usr/share/doc so that users 
 can browse package documentation.
 
 So moving these files and symlink them to where the package 
 expect them seems to me the right thing to do.
 
 This is wrong, actually:
 
 Code must not depend on /usr/share/doc existing on the machine, so 
 when a file is needed both by runtime and below /usr/share/doc then 
 the actual file should be placed elsewhere and a symlink be placed 
 below /usr/share/doc.
 
 Not sure if this is explicitly clarified in Debian Policy or only a 
 result of close-reading FHS (File Hierarchy Standard) or some such.  
 Perhaps look for sections regarding example scripts.
 
 
 In this context, I think the above suggestion makes the most sense.  
 So here's my plan:
 
 - make the LICENSE.txt file into a symlink, if GPL, BSD or other 
 common license
 - make usr/share/doc/pd-motex/README.txt a symlink to the one in the 
 library
 
 I'd need to remove LICENSE.txt then make the symllnk.  What's the 
 best way to remove the file?  I could patch the Makefile to remove 
 the line in 'make install' that installs LICENSE.txt the add a link 
 in debian/links.  Is there some easy/proper way in debhelper to just 
 remove an installed file?
 
 Your questions makes me suspect that you did not notice my earier 
 response in this thread (even earlier than above quoted one).
 
 Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:54:32 +0200
 Message-ID: 20100817095432.gg7...@jones.dk
 
 There I describe how I do similarly with Sugar packages.
 
 To answer more directly to your questions: No, I believe there is no 
 debhelper routine specifically for this.  Possibly you can make dh_link 
 force overwrite existing object, but I find my proposed approach of 
 replacing only if identical safer.

Ok, I did it with an 'rm' in debian/rules, hope that's ok.  I pushed the
commit.  

Also, FYI, I've been making all these changes to the other 25ish
packages that I'm working on, so they should be pretty tight once I
submit them.  Once pd-motex is in, I am thinking of running one more
thru individually, then once that's done, I'll submit the whole batch.
Does that work?

.hc


___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Introduction

2010-08-19 Thread Thomas Maass
I have a question about my package clipgrab.
The license says, that the program is licensed
under the GPLv3, but the name and the logo are
not. I have contacted the author. He said, that
he has the full copyright for the logo and the name.
He allowed my explicitly, that I may package the
program for Debian. He hopes, that this will be no
problem with the Debian policy. He said, changing
the logo and the name makes no sense.
The included changelog file describes, that only
the program is under GPLv3, but not the logo and
name.
Is this package correct now? How can / must I
describe the allowance of the author?
Maybe you could have a look at the package.
I have uploaded it to mentors (see earlier messages).
-- 
gpg-id: B4F786B1


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: uploaded first pkg: pd-motex

2010-08-19 Thread Felipe Sateler
On 19/08/10 13:36, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
 Once pd-motex is in, I am thinking of running one more
 thru individually, then once that's done, I'll submit the whole batch.
 Does that work?

I'm still not convinced that having one source package for all these
extensions is the best move (as opposed to making 1 big source package
that builds several binary packages)...


-- 
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Introduction

2010-08-19 Thread Jonas Smedegaard

On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 07:49:33PM +0200, Thomas Maass wrote:

I have a question about my package clipgrab.
The license says, that the program is licensed
under the GPLv3, but the name and the logo are
not. I have contacted the author. He said, that
he has the full copyright for the logo and the name.
He allowed my explicitly, that I may package the
program for Debian. He hopes, that this will be no
problem with the Debian policy. He said, changing
the logo and the name makes no sense.
The included changelog file describes, that only
the program is under GPLv3, but not the logo and
name.
Is this package correct now? How can / must I
describe the allowance of the author?
Maybe you could have a look at the package.
I have uploaded it to mentors (see earlier messages).


for Debian is unacceptable: All that Debian redistribute (in the 
main archive) must be equally redistributed by others as well.


Sounds like you then need to strip logo, and rename the project - 
similar to Firefox redistributed in Debian as Iceweasel.


Please if you have more questions about this, then this is not the right 
list: Discuss such things at debian-le...@lists.debian.org.



Kind regards,

 - Jonas

--
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist  Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: pd-zexy (upstream copyright)

2010-08-19 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-08-19 10:53, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
 debian/copyright still needs to be maintained by hand.  There is not
 yet any DEP5 validators or parsers, only the work-in-progress definition
 itself, at http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ - so hava a go at reading
 that :-)

thanks for the clarification.

 
 For the concrete FIXMEs I suggest we simply release the package as-is,
 and when next upstream release hopefully improves its copyright and
 licensing hints we may be able to sanely remove them.
 

i manually fixed the FIXMEs and pushed.
so i guess we are almost there.

fgmasdr
IOhannes



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Bug#557563: marked as done (audacity: Hi/Low Pass filters don't work)

2010-08-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:40:37 +0200
with message-id 1282257637.10075.6.ca...@deep-thought
and subject line audacity: Hi/Low Pass filters don't work
has caused the Debian Bug report #557563,
regarding audacity: Hi/Low Pass filters don't work
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
557563: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=557563
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: audacity
Version: 1.3.9-6
Severity: normal

- Create a Pink Noise (Insert -- Noise);
- Apply a Hi-Pass filter (select all track and go to Effects -- Plugins 1-9 
-- Hi-Pass Filter);
6dB/octave works fine;
12dB/octace don't works well. If you check with menu Analyser -- 
Frequency spectrum you will see a strange peak at cutoff frequency;
24-36-48dB/octave don't work. If you apply it, will popup a messagebox 
with a OK button, but nothing will happening after click on it.

The same problem with low-pass filter.

Best regards,
Renato S. Yamane


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.31.5 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages audacity depends on:
ii  audacity-data  1.3.9-6   A fast, cross-platform audio edito
ii  libasound2 1.0.21a-1 shared library for ALSA applicatio
ii  libc6  2.10.1-7  GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libexpat1  2.0.1-5   XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii  libflac++6 1.2.1-2+b1Free Lossless Audio Codec - C++ ru
ii  libflac8   1.2.1-2+b1Free Lossless Audio Codec - runtim
ii  libgcc11:4.4.1-4 GCC support library
ii  libglib2.0-0   2.22.2-2  The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk2.0-02.18.3-1  The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libid3tag0 0.15.1b-10ID3 tag reading library from the M
ii  libjack0   0.116.2+svn3592-3 JACK Audio Connection Kit (librari
ii  libmad00.15.1b-4 MPEG audio decoder library
ii  libogg01.1.4~dfsg-1  Ogg bitstream library
ii  libsamplerate0 0.1.7-3   Audio sample rate conversion libra
ii  libsndfile11.0.20-3  Library for reading/writing audio 
ii  libsoundtouch1c2   1.3.1-2   sound stretching library
ii  libstdc++6 4.4.1-4   The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libtwolame00.3.12-1  MPEG Audio Layer 2 encoding librar
ii  libvorbis0a1.2.3-3   The Vorbis General Audio Compressi
ii  libvorbisenc2  1.2.3-3   The Vorbis General Audio Compressi
ii  libvorbisfile3 1.2.3-3   The Vorbis General Audio Compressi
ii  libwxbase2.8-0 2.8.7.1-1.1   wxBase library (runtime) - non-GUI
ii  libwxgtk2.8-0  2.8.7.1-1.1   wxWidgets Cross-platform C++ GUI t

Versions of packages audacity recommends:
ii  libavcodec52   5:0.5+svn20091101-0.0 library to encode decode multimedi
ii  libavformat52  5:0.5+svn20091101-0.0 ffmpeg file format library

Versions of packages audacity suggests:
pn  ladspa-plugin none (no description available)
ii  libmp3lame0   3.98.2-0.5 LAME Ain't an MP3 Encoder

-- no debconf information


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Version: 1.3.12-2

As discussed upstream, the frequency spectrum after applying the
High-/Low-Pass filter is correct. Therefore I can't reproduce it with
1.3.12-2. Please reopen the bug if you still experience this issue with
1.3.12-2 (or later).

-- 
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
---End Message---
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: uploaded first pkg: pd-motex

2010-08-19 Thread Felipe Sateler
On 19/08/10 13:36, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
 On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 23:14 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
 On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 02:40:09PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:

 On Aug 17, 2010, at 11:39 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:

 On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 05:16:09PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
 On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 15:35:10 (CEST), Hans-Christoph Steiner 
 wrote:
 README.txt and LICENSE.txt are part of the Pd library format.  
 They are part of the library, and the Help Browser (aka the 
 library browser) looks for them to display them.  The library 
 format is basically a directory with files in it, and a subdir 
 called 'examples'.  That install target actually serves to 
 enforce that all the standard files are there.


 In this library, I could replace the file with a symlink to 
 ../../../ common-licenses/GPL-2, but other libraries might have 
 different licenses so this wouldn't always be the case.

 I guess that both the license and the README.txt actually belongs 
 to /usr/share/doc/$package, that's what debian policy tells us to 
 do. IIRC, documentation browsers like dhelp and the default 
 webserver's configurations publish /usr/share/doc so that users 
 can browse package documentation.

 So moving these files and symlink them to where the package 
 expect them seems to me the right thing to do.

 This is wrong, actually:

 Code must not depend on /usr/share/doc existing on the machine, so 
 when a file is needed both by runtime and below /usr/share/doc then 
 the actual file should be placed elsewhere and a symlink be placed 
 below /usr/share/doc.

 Not sure if this is explicitly clarified in Debian Policy or only a 
 result of close-reading FHS (File Hierarchy Standard) or some such.  
 Perhaps look for sections regarding example scripts.


 In this context, I think the above suggestion makes the most sense.  
 So here's my plan:

 - make the LICENSE.txt file into a symlink, if GPL, BSD or other 
 common license
 - make usr/share/doc/pd-motex/README.txt a symlink to the one in the 
 library

 I'd need to remove LICENSE.txt then make the symllnk.  What's the 
 best way to remove the file?  I could patch the Makefile to remove 
 the line in 'make install' that installs LICENSE.txt the add a link 
 in debian/links.  Is there some easy/proper way in debhelper to just 
 remove an installed file?

 Your questions makes me suspect that you did not notice my earier 
 response in this thread (even earlier than above quoted one).

 Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:54:32 +0200
 Message-ID: 20100817095432.gg7...@jones.dk

 There I describe how I do similarly with Sugar packages.

 To answer more directly to your questions: No, I believe there is no 
 debhelper routine specifically for this.  Possibly you can make dh_link 
 force overwrite existing object, but I find my proposed approach of 
 replacing only if identical safer.
 
 Ok, I did it with an 'rm' in debian/rules, hope that's ok.  I pushed the
 commit.  

So, pd-motex should be ready?

-- 
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: uploaded first pkg: pd-motex

2010-08-19 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner


On Aug 19, 2010, at 8:02 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:


On 19/08/10 13:36, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:

On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 23:14 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 02:40:09PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner  
wrote:


On Aug 17, 2010, at 11:39 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:


On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 05:16:09PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:

On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 15:35:10 (CEST), Hans-Christoph Steiner
wrote:

README.txt and LICENSE.txt are part of the Pd library format.
They are part of the library, and the Help Browser (aka the
library browser) looks for them to display them.  The library
format is basically a directory with files in it, and a subdir
called 'examples'.  That install target actually serves to
enforce that all the standard files are there.


In this library, I could replace the file with a symlink to
../../../ common-licenses/GPL-2, but other libraries might have
different licenses so this wouldn't always be the case.


I guess that both the license and the README.txt actually belongs
to /usr/share/doc/$package, that's what debian policy tells us to
do. IIRC, documentation browsers like dhelp and the default
webserver's configurations publish /usr/share/doc so that users
can browse package documentation.

So moving these files and symlink them to where the package
expect them seems to me the right thing to do.


This is wrong, actually:

Code must not depend on /usr/share/doc existing on the machine, so
when a file is needed both by runtime and below /usr/share/doc  
then

the actual file should be placed elsewhere and a symlink be placed
below /usr/share/doc.

Not sure if this is explicitly clarified in Debian Policy or  
only a
result of close-reading FHS (File Hierarchy Standard) or some  
such.

Perhaps look for sections regarding example scripts.



In this context, I think the above suggestion makes the most sense.
So here's my plan:

- make the LICENSE.txt file into a symlink, if GPL, BSD or other
common license
- make usr/share/doc/pd-motex/README.txt a symlink to the one in  
the

library

I'd need to remove LICENSE.txt then make the symllnk.  What's the
best way to remove the file?  I could patch the Makefile to remove
the line in 'make install' that installs LICENSE.txt the add a link
in debian/links.  Is there some easy/proper way in debhelper to  
just

remove an installed file?


Your questions makes me suspect that you did not notice my earier
response in this thread (even earlier than above quoted one).

Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:54:32 +0200
Message-ID: 20100817095432.gg7...@jones.dk

There I describe how I do similarly with Sugar packages.

To answer more directly to your questions: No, I believe there is no
debhelper routine specifically for this.  Possibly you can make  
dh_link

force overwrite existing object, but I find my proposed approach of
replacing only if identical safer.


Ok, I did it with an 'rm' in debian/rules, hope that's ok.  I  
pushed the

commit.


So, pd-motex should be ready?



Everything is ready from my end. :-)  Its feeling quite polished, plus  
all the rest too.


.hc




We have nothing to fear from love and commitment. - New York Senator  
Diane Savino, trying to convince the NY Senate to pass a gay marriage  
bill



___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers