RFP kmid2

2011-01-03 Thread Valerio Passini
Hello,

I have been redirected here from Debian-KDE mailing list. I was asking 
for someone who packages kmid2, the port to KDE4 of kmid. It seems that 
the original RFP (bug #578750) has been ignored since the past May 2010, 
and that the original packager has left Kmid probably for personal 
reasons, inviting someone else to take care of the package. Is there 
anyone interested in this task?
kmid2 is a very good application in my opinion for someone who just 
wants to listen to MIDIs and to do some karaoke in KDE because it's 
simple and with useful features like tempo and pitch control. It would 
be great to have this updated and developed version that integrates well 
within KDE4. Thank you

Valerio


P.S.: please, reply to me in CC because I'm not subscribed to this 
maling list.

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Debian Multimedia Menus (discussion)

2011-01-03 Thread rosea.grammostola



Please do consider using a wiki page for this.

Still makes sense to discuss entries here, but not to keep track of 
the progress of it as a whole.


I'll take a look at it. Btw this menus plan fits in the whole 'Debian 
Multimedia Blends process' maybe...

Making metapackages and menu entries...


I made a page here:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/DebianMultimediaMenu

Comments and discussion is welcome.

\r


___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Debian Multimedia Menus (discussion)

2011-01-03 Thread Jonas Smedegaard

On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 02:04:23PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:



Please do consider using a wiki page for this.

Still makes sense to discuss entries here, but not to keep track of 
the progress of it as a whole.


I'll take a look at it. Btw this menus plan fits in the whole 
'Debian Multimedia Blends process' maybe...

Making metapackages and menu entries...


I made a page here:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/DebianMultimediaMenu

Comments and discussion is welcome.


Good.

Your introduction and last phrase on that page discourages me from 
getting involved, however:  Seems you insist on customizing on top of 
Debian instead of integrating with Debian as I proposed.



 - Jonas

--
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist  Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Debian Multimedia Menus (discussion)

2011-01-03 Thread rosea.grammostola

On 01/03/2011 02:40 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:

On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 02:04:23PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:



Please do consider using a wiki page for this.

Still makes sense to discuss entries here, but not to keep track of 
the progress of it as a whole.


I'll take a look at it. Btw this menus plan fits in the whole 
'Debian Multimedia Blends process' maybe...

Making metapackages and menu entries...


I made a page here:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/DebianMultimediaMenu

Comments and discussion is welcome.


Good.

Your introduction and last phrase on that page discourages me from 
getting involved, however:  Seems you insist on customizing on top of 
Debian instead of integrating with Debian as I proposed.


Thanks for commenting. I should make that more clear I suppose.

Target one is to integrate it in Debian.
If that is not possible in some way, a customized DebianMultimediaMenu 
could be an option.


This is also what you meant right?

\r

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Debian Multimedia Menus (discussion)

2011-01-03 Thread Jonas Smedegaard

On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 02:48:00PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:

On 01/03/2011 02:40 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Your introduction and last phrase on that page discourages me from 
getting involved, however: Seems you insist on customizing on top of 
Debian instead of integrating with Debian as I proposed.


Thanks for commenting. I should make that more clear I suppose.

Target one is to integrate it in Debian.
If that is not possible in some way, a customized 
DebianMultimediaMenu could be an option.


This is also what you meant right?


What I mean is integration with main Debian menu system.

What you seem to mean is an ad-on package overriding parts of the main 
Debian menu system.


So no, I am talking about *integration* (not just inclusion).


 - Jonas

--
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist  Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Debian Multimedia Menus (discussion)

2011-01-03 Thread rosea.grammostola

On 01/03/2011 03:09 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:

On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 02:48:00PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:

On 01/03/2011 02:40 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Your introduction and last phrase on that page discourages me from 
getting involved, however: Seems you insist on customizing on top of 
Debian instead of integrating with Debian as I proposed.


Thanks for commenting. I should make that more clear I suppose.

Target one is to integrate it in Debian.
If that is not possible in some way, a customized 
DebianMultimediaMenu could be an option.


This is also what you meant right?


What I mean is integration with main Debian menu system.

What you seem to mean is an ad-on package overriding parts of the main 
Debian menu system.


So no, I am talking about *integration* (not just inclusion).


Right, this is what I meant. I think we're talking the same language now...

\r



___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Debian Multimedia Menus (discussion)

2011-01-03 Thread Jonas Smedegaard

On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 03:16:18PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:

On 01/03/2011 03:09 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:

On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 02:48:00PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:

On 01/03/2011 02:40 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Your introduction and last phrase on that page discourages me 
from getting involved, however: Seems you insist on customizing 
on top of Debian instead of integrating with Debian as I 
proposed.


Thanks for commenting. I should make that more clear I suppose.

Target one is to integrate it in Debian.
If that is not possible in some way, a customized 
DebianMultimediaMenu could be an option.


This is also what you meant right?


What I mean is integration with main Debian menu system.

What you seem to mean is an ad-on package overriding parts of the 
main Debian menu system.


So no, I am talking about *integration* (not just inclusion).


Right, this is what I meant. I think we're talking the same language now...


If your interest is integration with the Debian infrastructure - and 
particularly you want to improve the Debian menu system (rather than 
attaching an extension to it as one separately-maintained package), 
then...


  * Rewrite the list to be expressed like the Debian menu list
  * Rephrase intro and outro to talk about that

That rewriting should be easy, as I already did that in an earlier email 
in this very thread.



 - Jonas

--
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist  Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: new version of milkytracker

2011-01-03 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 03:46:28AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
 I am uncertain how happy others here are about other changes that I
 would wanna do - starting with enabling build-dependency
 auto-resolving a.k.a. that debian/control.in file discussed tonight
 regarding a PureData package.  So I hesitate doing more work just
 now.

I am not sure how much a debian/control.in file would be helpful (AFAIK
it is often cause of many problems). I think that the debian/control file
looks pretty simple and there is no need to make things more complicated.

What are the other changes you want to do?

-- 
perl -E'$_=q;$/= @{...@_]};and s;\S+;inidehG ordnasselA;eg;say~~reverse'

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: new version of milkytracker

2011-01-03 Thread Jonas Smedegaard

On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 04:20:16PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:

On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 03:46:28AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I am uncertain how happy others here are about other changes that I 
would wanna do - starting with enabling build-dependency 
auto-resolving a.k.a. that debian/control.in file discussed tonight 
regarding a PureData package.  So I hesitate doing more work just 
now.


I am not sure how much a debian/control.in file would be helpful (AFAIK 
it is often cause of many problems). I think that the debian/control 
file looks pretty simple and there is no need to make things more 
complicated.


What many problems are you referring to?



What are the other changes you want to do?


Please see recent commits of other packages for inspiration.


 - Jonas


--
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist  Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: new version of milkytracker

2011-01-03 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 04:52:15PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
 What many problems are you referring to?

I was reffering to the use of the auto-updating Build-Depends via
DEB_AUTO_UPDATE_DEBIAN_CONTROL (and #311724), but I noticed now that you 
use @cdbs@ without the DEB_AUTO_UPDATE_* thing. 

-- 
perl -E'$_=q;$/= @{...@_]};and s;\S+;inidehG ordnasselA;eg;say~~reverse'

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Bug#608807: ices2: ethernet address changed

2011-01-03 Thread Bob Proulx
Package: ices2
Version: 2.0.1-9
Severity: normal

A dist-upgrade today upgraded ices2.  The new dependencies pulled in
dnet-common, libdnet, libroar0, and muroard which caused the machine
to set the ethernet address to aa:0:4:0:a:4 from its previous address.
This of course caused the network to be problematic until the arp
caches timed out.  The package changing the ethernet address appears
to be dnet-common which is now a dependency of ices2.

Does ices2 really need to have decnet installed and configured?

Bob


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages ices2 depends on:
ii  libasound2  1.0.23-2.1   shared library for ALSA applicatio
ii  libc6   2.11.2-7 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libogg0 1.2.0~dfsg-1 Ogg bitstream library
ii  libroar00.3-2foundation libraries for the RoarA
ii  libshout3   2.2.2-5+b1   MP3/Ogg Vorbis broadcast streaming
ii  libvorbis0a 1.3.1-1  The Vorbis General Audio Compressi
ii  libvorbisenc2   1.3.1-1  The Vorbis General Audio Compressi
ii  libxml2 2.7.8.dfsg-2 GNOME XML library
ii  netbase 4.44 Basic TCP/IP networking system

ices2 recommends no packages.

Versions of packages ices2 suggests:
ii  icecast2  2.3.2-6Ogg Vorbis and MP3 streaming media
ii  muroard [roaraudio-server]0.1.0-4minimalist RoarAudio sound daemon

-- no debconf information



___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


deadbeef ready for upload

2011-01-03 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
Hi all,
I've just pushed many changes to the deadbeef repo, and I think it is now
almost ready for upload.

I managed to remove most of the bundled library (the other are not present 
in Debian) and modified the patches to not phisically remove the additional 
code.

I also switched to CDBS (thanks to Felipe and Jonas and the help they 
provided me for milkytracker :)). I think that now the debian/rules file 
and the debian/ directory look much cleaner.

Would someone please review it to check if I missed something, and upload 
it?

Thanks

-- 
perl -E'$_=q;$/= @{...@_]};and s;\S+;inidehG ordnasselA;eg;say~~reverse'

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Debian Multimedia Menus (discussion)

2011-01-03 Thread rosea.grammostola

On 01/03/2011 03:52 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:

On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 03:16:18PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:

On 01/03/2011 03:09 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:

On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 02:48:00PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:

On 01/03/2011 02:40 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Your introduction and last phrase on that page discourages me from 
getting involved, however: Seems you insist on customizing on top 
of Debian instead of integrating with Debian as I proposed.


Thanks for commenting. I should make that more clear I suppose.

Target one is to integrate it in Debian.
If that is not possible in some way, a customized 
DebianMultimediaMenu could be an option.


This is also what you meant right?


What I mean is integration with main Debian menu system.

What you seem to mean is an ad-on package overriding parts of the 
main Debian menu system.


So no, I am talking about *integration* (not just inclusion).


Right, this is what I meant. I think we're talking the same language 
now...


If your interest is integration with the Debian infrastructure - and 
particularly you want to improve the Debian menu system (rather than 
attaching an extension to it as one separately-maintained package), 
then...


  * Rewrite the list to be expressed like the Debian menu list
  * Rephrase intro and outro to talk about that

That rewriting should be easy, as I already did that in an earlier 
email in this very thread.


I edited the page

\r

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Debian Multimedia Menus (discussion)

2011-01-03 Thread Jonas Smedegaard

On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 08:35:56PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:

On 01/03/2011 03:52 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:

Target one is to integrate it in Debian.
If your interest is integration with the Debian infrastructure - and 
particularly you want to improve the Debian menu system (rather than 
attaching an extension to it as one separately-maintained package), 
then...


 * Rewrite the list to be expressed like the Debian menu list
 * Rephrase intro and outro to talk about that

That rewriting should be easy, as I already did that in an earlier 
email in this very thread.


I edited the page


Cool!

Yes, we do indeed talk about the same thing now :-D


Others here have any opinions on this?


 - Jonas

--
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist  Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Bug#608807: ices2: ethernet address changed

2011-01-03 Thread Jonas Smedegaard

reassign 608807 libdnet
severity 608807 important
retitle 608807 libdnet: library should only suggest dnet-common
thanks

On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 09:54:16AM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:

A dist-upgrade today upgraded ices2.  The new dependencies pulled in
dnet-common, libdnet, libroar0, and muroard which caused the machine
to set the ethernet address to aa:0:4:0:a:4 from its previous address.
This of course caused the network to be problematic until the arp
caches timed out.  The package changing the ethernet address appears
to be dnet-common which is now a dependency of ices2.

Does ices2 really need to have decnet installed and configured?


The newest ices2 supports libroar, which supports libdnet.

What seems wrong to me is not that linkage, but instead that the 
_library_ libdnet recommends the (apparent) _daemon_ dnet-common.


When dnet-common apparently affect the running system by default, I 
believe it is wrong to claim that libdnet use it in all but unusual 
installations - which is the definition of Requires according to 
Debian Policy ยง7.2.


It seems to me that libdnet should only suggest dnet-common.

Or alternatively (and less favored IMO), that dnet-common should not 
activate any of its system-affecting features by default.



 - Jonas

--
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist  Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Bug#608807: ices2: ethernet address changed

2011-01-03 Thread Philipp Schafft
reflum,

On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 09:54 -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
 Package: ices2
 Version: 2.0.1-9
 Severity: normal
 
 A dist-upgrade today upgraded ices2.  The new dependencies pulled in
 dnet-common, libdnet, libroar0, and muroard which caused the machine
 to set the ethernet address to aa:0:4:0:a:4 from its previous address.
 This of course caused the network to be problematic until the arp
 caches timed out.  The package changing the ethernet address appears
 to be dnet-common which is now a dependency of ices2.


To clear this up:

From #608812
 ices2 depends libroar0.
 libroar0 recommends roaraudio-server which is virtual, muroard got
 selected.
 libroar0 depends libdnet.
 libdnet recommends dnet-common.

The network setup thingy is part of dnet-common. Installing without it
is possible. libdnet does not produce strange errors on missing
dnet-common, it just detects the non existing support (implecide) and
returns normal ENOSYS and friends. So no problem here if not installed.

So please have a look if installing without recommends works.

Depends of ices2 on libroar0 isn't the problem.

I suggest to:
close the bug as invalid (it's not ices2's problem) as the install does
exactly what it is suppost to do: it try to set up the system in a way
all features works
OR re-assign it to source package dnprogs which includes libdnet and
dnet-common and request for some better way to solve this.

I do not consider this a ices2 bug as dnet-common is not a depends or
recommends of ices2.

 Does ices2 really need to have decnet installed and configured?

No, but:
libroar0 is used and it depends on libdnet so installed libdnet is
required (but the lib is very small and and stuff so I do not consider
this a problem). Configrued: no but in the case you actually want to use
DECnet support.


Hope I made this a bit more clear :)


 Bob
 
 
 -- System Information:
 Debian Release: 6.0
   APT prefers unstable
   APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
 
 Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
 Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
 
 Versions of packages ices2 depends on:
 ii  libasound2  1.0.23-2.1   shared library for ALSA
 applicatio
 ii  libc6   2.11.2-7 Embedded GNU C Library:
 Shared lib
 ii  libogg0 1.2.0~dfsg-1 Ogg bitstream library
 ii  libroar00.3-2foundation libraries for
 the RoarA
 ii  libshout3   2.2.2-5+b1   MP3/Ogg Vorbis broadcast
 streaming
 ii  libvorbis0a 1.3.1-1  The Vorbis General Audio
 Compressi
 ii  libvorbisenc2   1.3.1-1  The Vorbis General Audio
 Compressi
 ii  libxml2 2.7.8.dfsg-2 GNOME XML library
 ii  netbase 4.44 Basic TCP/IP networking
 system
 
 ices2 recommends no packages.
 
 Versions of packages ices2 suggests:
 ii  icecast2  2.3.2-6Ogg Vorbis and MP3
 streaming media
 ii  muroard [roaraudio-server]0.1.0-4minimalist RoarAudio
 sound daemon
 
 -- no debconf information


-- 
Philipp.
 (Rah of PH2)


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Bug#608807: ices2: ethernet address changed

2011-01-03 Thread Jonas Smedegaard

Hi Philipp,

Thanks for your clarification,

On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 12:46:21AM +0100, Philipp Schafft wrote:

I suggest to:
close the bug as invalid (it's not ices2's problem) as the install does
exactly what it is suppost to do: it try to set up the system in a way
all features works
OR re-assign it to source package dnprogs which includes libdnet and
dnet-common and request for some better way to solve this.


Already done the latter: reassigned to libdnet.

I find it wrong to close it when indeed there _is_ a bug somewhere.


 - Jonas

--
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist  Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Bug#608807: ices2: ethernet address changed

2011-01-03 Thread Jonas Smedegaard

reassign 608807 libdnet
severity 608807 important
retitle 608807 libdnet: library should only suggest dnet-common
thanks

[sent again - now cc'ed cont...@bugs.debian.org to actually take effect]


 - Jonas

--
  * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist  Internet-arkitekt
  * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Introduction

2011-01-03 Thread Joel Roth
Hi Multimedia Packaging Wizards and Wizardrettes!

I'm a long-time Debian user.  I mainly work in perl.  I'm
author of nama, a text/graphic UI for multitrack recording
based on Ecasound, and maintain a couple of CPAN modules.
I've got an alioth account, bolangi-guest, and have
been involved in the pkg-perl team.

I'm interested in seeing that an orphaned-but-useful python
app, MMA - Musical Midi Accompaniment, gets updated,
hopefully in time to squeeze into squeeze.

Current (outdated) package: http://packages.debian.org/lenny/mma 

Orphan status (missing): 
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?include=subject%3Amma;dist=unstable;package=wnpp

Author's Website: http://mellowood.ca/mma/

Look forward to your guidance and assistance. 

Regards,

-- 
Joel Roth

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers