Matteo F. Vescovi joined Debian Multimedia Maintainers team
Hi all, right few minutes ago, Matteo F. Vescovi joined the Debian Multimedia Maintainers team on Alioth, willing to work on the packaging of libmp4v2: please, give him a warm welcome! Matteo, have you already checked our policies [1]? There are some other packages you intend to bring under DMM team's umbrella? [1] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/DevelopPackaging#Packaging_guidelines -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer | quadris...@ubuntu.com 0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Matteo F. Vescovi joined Debian Multimedia Maintainers team
Hi Alessio, hi DMM team! On 06/08/2011 10:41, Alessio Treglia wrote: Hi all, right few minutes ago, Matteo F. Vescovi joined the Debian Multimedia Maintainers team on Alioth, willing to work on the packaging of libmp4v2: please, give him a warm welcome! Thanks a lot for your trust and support! :-) Matteo, have you already checked our policies [1]? Yep... and I'm already used to those guidelines due to gtkpod packaging. git-buildpackage is a great tool, but I'm having some issues in building gtkpod with it... don't know why. I'll check soon. There are some other packages you intend to bring under DMM team's umbrella? Not at the moment, but in case I'll let you know about any new request made by users. [1] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/DevelopPackaging#Packaging_guidelines Cheers, mfv -- Ing. Matteo F. Vescovi -- Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o contenuti pericolosi da MailScanner, ed e' risultato non infetto. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Matteo F. Vescovi joined Debian Multimedia Maintainers team
On 06/08/2011 11:32, Alessio Treglia wrote: FYI, you find the git repository at: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/mp4v2.git Yes, I knew... I'll clone it later this afternoon and give it a good look at it. Anyhow, thanks for the advice ;-) Take care. -- Ing. Matteo F. Vescovi -- Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o contenuti pericolosi da MailScanner, ed e' risultato non infetto. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#636847: audacious-plugins: Build doesn't define the exact set of features enabled
Package: audacious-plugins Version: 2.4.4-1 Severity: important I did a rebuild of audacious-plugins, and since I had libnotify-dev installed that got me the notify plugin built (and a dependency on libnotify). Please either build-depend on libnotify-dev or build with --disable-notify, and check if there are other features where a rebuild might result in a different set of features. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#630787: can not update/install morituri because of a syntaxerror
On Thu, 4 Aug 2011 14:23:20 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: Closing *again* as a non-bug. I follow, but here's my 2 cents from userland... If a 'python2.3' package existed in the current Debian distros, then this bug could be moved to that package. No 'python2.3' package currently exists in Debian. Must it therefore follow, (as has been argued), that there is no install bug? At least two users have been bitten, and have registered their doubts. Bug #630787 seems to be a systemic Debian meta bug, where incomplete or inaccurate metadata from an unmaintained ex-package _breaks_ the install for a current package update. From userland it's hard to see why such breakage should ever be allowed. If such a 'ghostly influence' meta bug already exists, then #630787 should be merged with it. If such a meta bug does not exist, then #630787 should be moved and renamed to the appropriate meta package. Otherwise we can expect that future maintainers will needlessly be distracted by users with similarly misdirected bug reports, perhaps forever... ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
liblivemedia 2011.07.21-1 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the liblivemedia source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 2011.07.08-1 Current version: 2011.07.21-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
lives 1.4.5-1 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the lives source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.4.4-1 Current version: 1.4.5-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
pd-pmpd 0.9-4 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the pd-pmpd source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.9-3 Current version: 0.9-4 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
qtractor 0.5.0-2 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the qtractor source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.4.9-1 Current version: 0.5.0-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Are libav and x264 DFSG-free now?
On Sa, Aug 06, 2011 at 14:41:58 (CEST), Eugen Dedu wrote: Hi, First, a minor incoherence: on http://packages.qa.debian.org/liba/libav.html the maintainer field is Debian multimedia packages maintainers, while on http://packages.qa.debian.org/x/x264.html it is Debian Multimedia Maintainers, even if both teams are the same team in fact. Oh, thanks, I'll update that on the next upload. And now to my original question. I have looked on Internet without finding the answer. I would like to know why libav (ffmpeg) and x264 are now found in main while before they were not. Why before they were considered DFSG non-free, and now they are considered DFSG-free? Has anything changed in the patents they code? Has DSFG-freeness changed? Have ftp-master changed their mind? More generally, what has changed between when they were non-free and now? I can reaffirm that Debian distributes both libav as well as x264 under the GPLv2, which is perfectly compliant with the DFSG. As for your question regarding patents, please a look at the Debian Patent FAQ: http://www.debian.org/reports/patent-faq There may or may not be soon a libav-extra package in debian that is distributed under GPLv3, but that's probably unrelated to your question. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Are libav and x264 DFSG-free now?
On 06/08/11 19:43, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Sa, Aug 06, 2011 at 14:41:58 (CEST), Eugen Dedu wrote: Hi, First, a minor incoherence: on http://packages.qa.debian.org/liba/libav.html the maintainer field is Debian multimedia packages maintainers, while on http://packages.qa.debian.org/x/x264.html it is Debian Multimedia Maintainers, even if both teams are the same team in fact. Oh, thanks, I'll update that on the next upload. And now to my original question. I have looked on Internet without finding the answer. I would like to know why libav (ffmpeg) and x264 are now found in main while before they were not. Why before they were considered DFSG non-free, and now they are considered DFSG-free? Has anything changed in the patents they code? Has DSFG-freeness changed? Have ftp-master changed their mind? More generally, what has changed between when they were non-free and now? I can reaffirm that Debian distributes both libav as well as x264 under the GPLv2, which is perfectly compliant with the DFSG. As for your question regarding patents, please a look at the Debian Patent FAQ: http://www.debian.org/reports/patent-faq There may or may not be soon a libav-extra package in debian that is distributed under GPLv3, but that's probably unrelated to your question. I still do not understand. You say that now they are compliant with DFSG. But my main question is: what has changed between a few years ago when those codecs were NOT in main, and now when they ARE in main? Shouldn't they have been in main since the beginning then? -- Eugen ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Are libav and x264 DFSG-free now?
On Sa, Aug 06, 2011 at 20:34:59 (CEST), Eugen Dedu wrote: [...] I can reaffirm that Debian distributes both libav as well as x264 under the GPLv2, which is perfectly compliant with the DFSG. As for your question regarding patents, please a look at the Debian Patent FAQ: http://www.debian.org/reports/patent-faq There may or may not be soon a libav-extra package in debian that is distributed under GPLv3, but that's probably unrelated to your question. I still do not understand. You say that now they are compliant with DFSG. But my main question is: what has changed between a few years ago when those codecs were NOT in main, and now when they ARE in main? Shouldn't they have been in main since the beginning then? I think so, yes. For details, you'd need to ask ftp-master that. In terms of communication between ftp-master and pkg-multimedia, the situation is as ever: there is none on this matter. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
hi
Hallo liebe Komplimente des Tages! Ich habe Ihre Kontaktdaten auf meiner privaten Suche nach einem zuverlässigen und vertrauenswürdigen Person, ich weiß, dass diese E-Mail werden Sie in eine gute Gesundheit zu treffen und auch surprisely aber Gott hat seinen eigenen Weg, um Menschen zusammenzubringen. Ich war bewegt, Ihnen zu schreiben und auch versuchen deinen Rat, von denen ich weiß, dass es hilft mir, meine jetzige Situation zu überwinden, ich bin derzeit Single und auf der Suche nach einem vertrauenswürdigen und gottesfürchtige Person. Meine Liebste, In Ihrer Freizeit können Sie bitte du zu mir zurück schreiben, damit ich mehr erklären, über mich selbst, meine Daten, meine Bilder und meine Absicht, Ihnen zu schreiben. Bitte vernachlässigen Sie nicht bescheiden und einsamen Herzen, die für Ihre Liebe sucht. Eine gute Freundschaft ist das Fundament, auf andere relative Dinge, die kommen zu bauen. Möge Gott Sie segnen, wie ich ungeduldig, von Ihnen zu lesen warten. Mit freundlichen Linda. - Hello dear compliments of the day! I got your contact on my private search for a reliable and trusted person; I know that this email will meet you in a good health and also surprisely but God have his own way of bringing people together. I was moved to write to you and also seek your advice of which i know that it'll help me to overcome my present situation, I'm presently single and searching for a trusted and God fearing person. My dearest, In your free time, may it please you to write me back so that i can explain more about myself, my details, my pictures and my purpose of writing to you. Please do not neglect a humble and lonely heart that seeks for your love. A good friendship is the foundation build on other relative things to come. May God bless you as i wait impatiently to read from you. Yours Linda. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#636921: ardour: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*
Package: ardour Version: 1:2.8.11-6 Severity: important Tags: patch Justification: fails to build from source Hello! As can be seen from the buildd logs, Ardour fails to build on non-Linux ports: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ardoursuite=sid I have attached a patch which allows it to build on at least kFreeBSD architectures. I have tested building and running the modified package on both kfreebsd-amd64 and [linux-]amd64 systems, and have not found any problems with it. As noted in the patch, thanks to the FreeBSD porters, without whose work this would have been a lot more difficult. Please let me know if you need any more information. Thanks! Steven. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (800, 'unstable'), (700, 'experimental') Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: kFreeBSD 8.2-1-amd64 Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages ardour depends on: ii jackd5 JACK Audio Connection Kit (default ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.21-1Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-0 2.0.1-2 ATK accessibility toolkit ii libatkmm-1.6-1 2.22.5-1C++ wrappers for ATK accessibility ii libaubio20.3.2-4.2 a library for audio segmentation ii libc0.1 2.13-14 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libcairo21.10.2-6.1 The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra ii libcairomm-1.0-1 1.10.0-1C++ wrappers for Cairo (shared lib ii libcurl3-gnutls 7.21.7-1Multi-protocol file transfer libra ii libfftw3-3 3.2.2-1 library for computing Fast Fourier ii libfontconfig1 2.8.0-3 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.4.6-1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:4.6.1-4 GCC support library ii libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 2.23.5-3GDK Pixbuf library ii libglib2.0-0 2.28.6-1The GLib library of C routines ii libglibmm-2.4-1c2a 2.28.1-1C++ wrapper for the GLib toolkit ( ii libgnomecanvas2-02.30.3-1powerful object-oriented display e ii libgnomecanvasmm-2.6 2.26.0-1C++ wrappers for libgnomecanvas2 ( ii libgtk2.0-0 2.24.5-4GTK+ graphical user interface libr ii libgtkmm-2.4-1c2a1:2.24.0-1 C++ wrappers for GTK+ (shared libr ii libjack0 [libjack-0. 1:0.121.0+svn4469-2 JACK Audio Connection Kit (librari ii liblo7 0.26~repack-7 Lightweight OSC library ii liblrdf0 0.4.0-5 library to manipulate RDF files de ii libpango1.0-01.28.4-2Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpangomm-1.4-1 2.28.2-1C++ Wrapper for pango (shared libr ii libraptor1 1.4.21-5Raptor RDF parser and serializer l ii libraptor2-0 2.0.4-1 Raptor 2 RDF syntax library ii librasqal3 0.9.26-1Rasqal RDF query library ii librdf0 1.0.13-3Redland Resource Description Frame ii libsamplerate0 0.1.7-3 Audio sample rate conversion libra ii libsigc++-2.0-0c2a 2.2.9-1 type-safe Signal Framework for C++ ii libslv2-90.6.6-9 A library for simple use of LV2 pl ii libsndfile1 1.0.25-2Library for reading/writing audio ii libstdc++6 4.6.1-4 GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libusb-0.1-4 2:0.1.12-18 userspace USB programming library ii libvamp-hostsdk3 2.1-1 helper library for Vamp hosts writ ii libvamp-sdk2 2.1-1 helper library for Vamp plugins wr ii libxml2 2.7.8.dfsg-4GNOME XML library ii libxslt1.1 1.1.26-8XSLT 1.0 processing library - runt ii python 2.6.7-2 interactive high-level object-orie ii python-gtk2 2.24.0-2Python bindings for the GTK+ widge ii python-twisted 11.0.0-2Event-based framework for internet Versions of packages ardour recommends: ii iceweasel [www-browser] 6.0~b4-1 Web browser based on Firefox ii midori [www-browser] 0.4.0-1fast, lightweight graphical web br ii w3m [www-browser] 0.5.3-3WWW browsable pager with excellent ardour suggests no packages. -- debconf-show failed diff --git a/debian/patches/160_kfreebsd.patch b/debian/patches/160_kfreebsd.patch new file mode 100644 index 000..631e085 --- /dev/null +++ b/debian/patches/160_kfreebsd.patch @@ -0,0 +1,175 @@ +Remove assumptions about ALSA presence to allow to build on non-Linux ports. Thanks to the FreeBSD porters, on whose work this is based. +--- a/SConstruct b/SConstruct +@@ -1016,7
Re: please upload pd-osc
One important upstream detail is that the lib is called 'osc', the folder in SVN is called 'osc', the package is called 'pd-osc', therefore the OSC-meta.pd needs to be osc-meta.pd to match the library and package name. That change is already in the upstream SVN. Also, it'd be good to get a release signed-off by Martin Peach, the upstream author, and to make the release tarball that you posted also match the other names, i.e. osc-0.1.tar.gz rather than OSC-0.1.tar.gz. .hc On Aug 4, 2011, at 10:21 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 dear fellow pkgers, after debconf i finally found the time to package one of my longstanding ITPs (before it finally expires!): pd-osc pd-osc is a puredata library adding Open Sound Control (OSC) capabilities (at the application layer (OSI-7)) to Pd. It allows one to construct and parse OSC messages within Pd. It includes support for ordinary OSC-messages, typetags, timetags and bundles. These objects are transport-agnostic, so you can use them to transmit OSC over UDP, TCP/IP, serial port, or in fact whatever you want. However, you will have to install additional libraries that will handle the transport layer (like pd-iemnet or pd-comport). [1] the package can be found at: git+ssh://git.debian.org/pkg-multimedia/pd-osc http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/pd-osc.git it appears to be lintian clean (there is a single Pedantic warning, about a missing upstream changelog). it builds cleanly in my pbuilder environment. this package uses CDBS (ping jonas!) i would be glad if somebody could review the package and throw some comments at me. if there is somebody willing to upload the package, that would be even nicer :-) @jonas: i shamelessly copied a README.source written by you, which i found in the scenic package. it has no built-in copyright notice, so i assumed it is GPL-3+; could you please confirm that? fmgasdr IOhannes [1] that's what it says in debian/control -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk46quYACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvRzyACfRObaaOtt4u/ZqaNki9hhwgdp Ih0AoKcJDquNbzNe/Nl5HEBaOFsFekFV =j3Xp -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers 'You people have such restrictive dress for women,’ she said, hobbling away in three inch heels and panty hose to finish out another pink- collar temp pool day. - “Hijab Scene #2, by Mohja Kahf ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
