Re: Wheezy update of audiofile?
Hi, On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 6:46 AM, Chris Lamb <la...@debian.org> wrote: > Would you like to take care of this yourself? I don't spare much time these days, so unless any Debian Multimedia maintainer steps up, I'd advise you LTS guys to go head please. Thanks. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#853284: RFA: terminatorx
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, Due to the lack of time and interest, I intend to orphan terminatorx soon. The package is in good shape and upstream is active, responsive, and collaborative. Thanks for considering. Regards. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: review dvd-slideshow
Hi, On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Herbert Fortes <terb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Can someone review dvd-slideshow[0] ? Done, and uploaded. Thanks! -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Laborejo
Hi there, I am no longer interested in maintaining laborejo: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/laborejo Is anyone interested in taking over? If not, I will file a orphaning bug for it. Cheers! -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#834953: ams: Should this package be removed?
Hi Reinhard, On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Reinhard Tartler <siret...@debian.org> wrote: > The package "ams" hasn't seen an upstream release since April 2014 > (cf. http://alsamodular.sourceforge.net/). The last upload to debian > was on 2014-04-12. > > It currently has one RC bug, and if I read popcon correctly, 46 > installations: https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=ams Upstream's latest release is available since January 2016: https://sourceforge.net/projects/alsamodular/files/alsamodular/2.1.2/ Unfortunately I haven't found yet enough time to upgrade the package and fix the RC issue. Cheers. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: new upstream release: frei0r 1.5
Hi there! On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 1:57 AM, Jaromil <jaro...@dyne.org> wrote: > Please note we have released a new version of the frei0r plugin > collection, 1.5, including 2 years worth of bugfixes. $ wget https://files.dyne.org/frei0r/releases/frei0r-plugins-1.5.0.tar.gz --2016-04-02 15:59:38-- https://files.dyne.org/frei0r/releases/frei0r-plugins-1.5.0.tar.gz Resolving files.dyne.org (files.dyne.org)... 178.21.114.142 Connecting to files.dyne.org (files.dyne.org)|178.21.114.142|:443... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 403 Forbidden 2016-04-02 15:59:41 ERROR 403: Forbidden. Cheers! -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#815732: O: videotrans
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, Due to the lack of time and interest, I'm orphaning videotrans. Cheers! ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#815492: O: silan
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, Due to the lack of time and interest, I'm orphaning silan. Cheers! ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#815334: O: m2vrequantiser
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, Due to the lack of time and interest, I intend to orphan m2vrequantiser. Cheers! -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#815336: O: pugl
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, Due to the lack of time and interest, I intend to orphan pugl. Cheers! -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#815327: O: volti
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, Due to the lack of time and interest, I'm orphaning volti. Cheers! ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#815232: O: gscanbus
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, Due to the lack of time and resources, I'm orphaning gscanbus. Cheers! ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#815229: O: fomp
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, Due to the lack of time and interest, I'm orphaning fomp. Cheers! ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#815228: O: dvdwizard
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, Due to the lack of time and interest, I'm orphaning dvdwizard. Cheers! ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Call for uploaders (was: orphaning packages)
Hi! As follow-up of the discussion aforementioned, I'm writing down here a list of packages that I am no longer interested, though still listed as the sole Uploader in debian/control: - autotalent [good shape, upstream inactive, not much work required] - dvdwizard [good shape, upstream inactive, not much work required] - fomp [good shape, upstream inactive, not much work required] - gscanbus [good shape, upstream inactive, not much work required] - libdvbcsa [good shape, upstream inactive, not much work required] - libshout-idjc [good shape, upstream inactive, not much work required] - lv2proc [good shape, new upstream release available although NASPRO upstream seems generally inactive, not much work required] - lv2vocoder [good shape, upstream inactive, not much work required] - m2vrequantiser [good shape, upstream inactive, not much work required] - mudita24 [good shape, upstream inactive, not much work required] - pugl [good shape, active upstream] - silan [good shape, upstream inactive, should cherry-pick this commit [1]] - sndobj [good shape, upstream inactive, need to package new upstream release] - videotrans [good shape, upstream inactive, not much work required] - volti [good shape, upstream inactive, not much work required] - xcfa [good shape, upstream inactive, not much work required] If you want to adopt some of them, please speak up! I'll start filing O: bugs in the weekend. Cheers! [1] https://github.com/x42/silan/commit/185f1de45162982718d896d26af5253df9bee419 -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: orphaning packages
Forgotten part of the statement On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 3:08 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) <umlae...@debian.org> wrote: > On 2016-02-16 15:44, Alessio Treglia wrote: >> As an aside note, I'll file an O: bug for all those packages for which >> I am the sole mentioned in the Uploaders list. && and no longer interested in -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: orphaning packages
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 12:59 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) <umlae...@debian.org> wrote: > i would like to ask you (all of you, fellow pkg-multimedia members), to > send ITOs to the list (a few days) *before* actually orphaning packages > (filing wnpp bugs, QA uploading packages). Thanks for pointing this out, I apologize for having thought that CC'ing the team was enough. I'm quite time-starved, therefore I prefer to see my packages being taken care by those who can allocate more time than me. I'll be issuing another couple of O: rounds and I'll be dropping here a list of packages I'm no longer interested in beforehand (i.e.: before and not past actually running `reportbug -B debian wnpp), in the meantime feel free to pick *any* of my multimedia packages if you feel like to. As an aside note, I'll file an O: bug for all those packages for which I am the sole mentioned in the Uploaders list. Cheers! -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#814899: O: naspro-bridges
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, Due to the lack of time and interest, I'm orphaning naspro-bridges. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#814898: O: naspro-bridge-it
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, Due to the lack of time and interest, I'm orphaning naspro-bridge-it. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#814897: O: naspro-core
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, Due to the lack of time and interest, I'm orphaning naspro-core. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#814895: O: mudita24
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, Due to lack of interest and time, I'm orphaning mudita24. Cheers! ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#814894: O: mididings
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, Due to lack of interest and time, I'm orphaning mididings. Cheers! ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#814893: O: meterec
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, Due to lack of time and interest, I'm orphaning meterec. Cheers! ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#814887: O: libavc1394
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, Due to lack of time and interest, I'm orphaning libavc1394. Cheers. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#814885: O: ino-headers
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, Cause of lack of time and interest, I'm orphaning ino-headers. Cheers. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#814504: RM: azr3-jack -- ROM; RC buggy; unmaintained upstream
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, Please remove azr3-jack. Regards. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#813497: closed by Bálint Réczey <bal...@balintreczey.hu> (reply to bal...@balintreczey.hu) (Re: Bug#813497: kodi: Segfault on Startup)
Please close again this bug by specifying the version it is no longer reproducible. Cheers. On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 12:49 AM, Stephen Allen <marathon.duran...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Well, whatever it was, it's been fixed in a recent upgrade since. > Perhaps just one of those things that happens when running SID. Thanks > for your attention to this matter. > > ___ > pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list > pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: VCS mails now forwarded to dispatch+$src_...@tracker.debian.org
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Sebastian Ramacher <sramac...@debian.org> wrote: > I have updated our setup-repository script and hooks.bcc of all git > repositories to the > new address Nice work, thanks mate! -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#785025: ogmrip: unused B-D libx264-dev
Hi Sebastian, Please feel free to commit your patch to git. Cheers! -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: linuxsampler?
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 3:29 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) <umlae...@debian.org> wrote: > it apparently is non-free, but is this the only reason? > (i searched the net, but couldn't find anything) It's a long standing issue, upstream releases it under a sort GPL with a commercial exception [1], that makes 1. no sense at all 2. the whole software package in conflict with the GPL itself I don't think we could even upload it to non-free, though I'm not 100% sure. [1] https://www.linuxsampler.org/downloads.html#exception -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: linuxsampler?
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org> wrote: >> i'm aware of the exception, but thought that non-free might be ok. [snip] > This FAQ suggests to me that the clause is just void, but the wording > is not very clear. This has already been debated in debian-legal [1], and another possible interpretation follows: > That is indeed non-free and fails DFSG #6, the package cannot be in main, but > could be in non-free maybe. Probably not, according to some interpretations (the GPL does not allow adding restrictions. The author can distribute the work, since he/she is the author, but noone else can distribute a work licensed in this way). [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/09/msg00331.html -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: lives: Depending on plugins? Suggesting with archs?
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 8:50 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) umlae...@debian.org wrote: i wonder why lives has a *hard* dependency on frei0r-plugins. will it refuse work if that set of plugins (that are dlopen()ed) are not present on the system? Nope, it won't, though both the build the runtime dependencies are highly recommended by upstream. i also wonder why there is an arch-specification in the 'Suggests': Suggests: libdv-bin[!hurd-i386] Well, no clear answer here, we should investigate with git blame. I guess that it would cause no big issues to either adjust it or keep it as it is now though. Cheers. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: lives: Depending on plugins? Suggesting with archs?
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 1:43 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig zmoel...@umlaeute.mur.at wrote: isn't that what Recommends is for? Correct. ACK from me to demote it to Recommends. and these days frei0r seems to be available on all platforms that are blacklisted. Agreed, let's remove the arch restrictions then. Thanks! -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#794817: Should mplayer2 be removed from unstable?
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Sebastian Ramacher sramac...@debian.org wrote: I think mplayer2 should be removed because: * It is dead upstream (even the homepage is gone). * mplayer is back in Debian, which can replace mplayer2. … and one copy of mplayer is surely enough. Alessio, Jonas, Reinhard: What is your opinion on that? ACK from me. Let's just drop it. Cheers! -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Uploading mediatomb to wheezy-pu
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 4:42 AM, Miguel A. Colón Vélez debian.mic...@gmail.com wrote: Could someone upload and tag the wheezy branch from git [1] into wheezy/oldstable pu? Could you please fix the changelog? s/wheezy/oldstable/ I'll eventually upload it. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Requesting upload of MPlayer.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Miguel A. Colón Vélez debian.mic...@gmail.com wrote: I finished the packaging for reintroducing MPlayer[1] to unstable. Could someone upload it? Uploading it right now. Cheers! -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Uploading ffmpeg 2.7.2-1
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote: did you already coordinate this transition with the release team? What is the transition tracking bug? The release team is awake and reactive on this: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=792619 AFAICS only the upload remains. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#792593: lives: please make the build reproducible
Hi Gabriel,
How are you doing? Hope it's all good.
I received this email from the Debian Reproducible builds team which
brought a patch up to my attention to make the build of lives
reproducible from sources.
Please see the following message:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Dhole dh...@openmailbox.org wrote:
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that lives could not be built reproducibly. During the building of the
plugins from script files, the onchange entires appear in random
ordering as they are stored in a hash and then iterated by the hash keys
(who's order can differ between runs).
The attached patch sorts the onchange entries when building plugins from
scripts to make the package build reproducible.
Once applied, lives can be built reproducibly in our
current experimental framework.
Please also consider forwarding this patch upstream.
[1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds
You may find the patch attached, it is quite small and non-invasive.
I think it would be great if you could apply it upstream.
Thanks for considering.
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org
Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com
0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A
diff -Nru lives-2.4.0~ds0/debian/changelog lives-2.4.0~ds0/debian/changelog
--- lives-2.4.0~ds0/debian/changelog2015-07-11 17:49:51.0 +0200
+++ lives-2.4.0~ds0/debian/changelog2015-07-15 17:36:30.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+lives (2.4.0~ds0-1.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Sort the onchange entries when building plugins from scripts to
+make the package build reproducible.
+
+ -- Dhole dh...@openmailbox.org Wed, 15 Jul 2015 17:36:10 +0200
+
lives (2.4.0~ds0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
[ Alessio Treglia ]
diff -Nru
lives-2.4.0~ds0/debian/patches/06-sort-onchanges-entries-in-plugins.patch
lives-2.4.0~ds0/debian/patches/06-sort-onchanges-entries-in-plugins.patch
--- lives-2.4.0~ds0/debian/patches/06-sort-onchanges-entries-in-plugins.patch
1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ lives-2.4.0~ds0/debian/patches/06-sort-onchanges-entries-in-plugins.patch
2015-07-15 17:37:06.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+Description: Sort onchange entries when generating plugins
+ .
+ lives (2.4.0~ds0-1.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+ .
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Sort the onchange entries when building plugins from scripts to
+ make package build reproducible.
+Author: Dhole dh...@openmailbox.org
+
+---
+
+--- lives-2.4.0~ds0.orig/build-lives-rfx-plugin
lives-2.4.0~ds0/build-lives-rfx-plugin
+@@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ sub gen_onchange {
+ }
+
+ if ($pass==1) {
+- foreach $which (keys %hash) {
++ foreach $which (sort keys %hash) {
+ print OUT \nif (\$command eq \onchange_$which\) {\n;
+
+ if (@requires$is_util$which eq init) {
diff -Nru lives-2.4.0~ds0/debian/patches/series
lives-2.4.0~ds0/debian/patches/series
--- lives-2.4.0~ds0/debian/patches/series 2015-07-05 16:27:05.0
+0200
+++ lives-2.4.0~ds0/debian/patches/series 2015-07-15 17:36:44.0
+0200
@@ -5,3 +5,4 @@
05-gcc-5.patch
parallel-build.patch
9990-buildsystem.patch
+06-sort-onchanges-entries-in-plugins.patch
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#791490: Package libgpac3 should be libgpac4
I started a build here [1], please have a look at the result. [1] http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/gpac/0.5.2-426-gc5ad4e4+dfsg5-1/ -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Bug#791490: Package libgpac3 should be libgpac4
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote: You mean you agree with asking for binNMU for x264 or you want to tell them something different? In my testing x264 got fixed by a simple rebuild. I double-checked with dak on coccia.d.o, and yes, that should be enough. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Bug#791490: Package libgpac3 should be libgpac4
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org wrote: On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote: I think it is case 7.6.2 of [2] since the the files are not the same. The library has been moved to the multiarch location. Mmmno, wait, don't use Conflicts. Instead I suggest to put Breaks: libgpac3 (= 0.5.2-426-gc5ad4e4~dfsg4-1) Replaces: libgpac3 into libgpac4's stanza. Why and what would be the consequences? 1. the Breaks field says that libgpac4 is uninstallable with a libgpac3's specific version. That allows users to keep old versions of libgpac3 installed along with libgpac4 and makes the transition smoother. 2. the Replaces field would allow libgpac4 to overwrite files installed by the libgpac3's sole broken version. I guess you've already got in touch with the release team. If you haven't yet, we'll have to inform them about this issue as soon as possible [1]. Cheers. [1] that means *now* -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#791490: Package libgpac3 should be libgpac4
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote: I think it is case 7.6.2 of [2] since the the files are not the same. The library has been moved to the multiarch location. Which package do you want to force-remove? -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#791490: Package libgpac3 should be libgpac4
Am Mittwoch, den 08.07.2015, 06:45 -0500 schrieb Bálint Réczey: In my interpretation of [2] this is enough if both packages contain the same file while it is not our case. IMO 7.6.2 applies here where the Conflicts: is needed, too. I have pushed what would work IMO. I'd suggest to merge what *does* work (namely [1]) rather than what in your opinion hopefully should. [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-multimedia/gpac.git/commit/?id=d422ed34b -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#791490: Package libgpac3 should be libgpac4
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote: Ideally we should have started a proper transition, but since the reverse dependencies (x264) already gets broken when it is upgraded I suggest uploading the fixed package to unstable. I hope the package passes NEW fast. It doesn't look bad, except for [1]. I'd encourage you to read [2] carefully (normally a Breaks/Replaces pair should do the trick). I can give you a couple of hints: 1. Always run lintian on the packages built with appropriate options such as -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian 2. Test the full upgrade path from 0.5.0+svn5324~dfsg1-1. Cheers. [1] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/2015-July/045621.html [2] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] gpac/master: Rename library package to libgpac4
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 9:05 AM, rbal...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit c2b5a9d9ff0fa7fa05f30f2010e53e313577121c Author: Balint Reczey bal...@balintreczey.hu Date: Tue Jul 7 16:27:32 2015 -0700 Rename library package to libgpac4 Closes: #791490 This is not enough as you're moving files from a package to another, so please add the appropriate Replaces/Conflicts/Breaks fields. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#791490: Package libgpac3 should be libgpac4
Hello Balint, On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 5:29 PM, djcj d...@gmx.de wrote: Package: gpac Version: 0.5.2-426-gc5ad4e4~dfsg4-1 The package libgpac3 should be renamed to libgpac4. Would you please fix this? -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Select provider of libav* libraries
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/FFmpeg/Statement I'd like to send this to devel-announce by Tuesday, any objections? -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Select provider of libav* libraries
Shall we draft a brief public statement? https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/FFmpeg/Statement Cheers. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Select provider of libav* libraries
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote: What do you think about the following? Fine to me, please do edit the wiki page! We'll let others review it then. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Select provider of libav* libraries
Hi again, On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org wrote: Two votes for Libav: Jonas [8] and Alessio [9]. I've forgotten to clarify that FWIW, despite of my vote in favor of libav, I am not in a strong opposition against the switch over. Cheers. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Select provider of libav* libraries
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote: Andreas changed packaging to ship the altivec flavor, too, until runtime CPU detection is fixed. Is there anything left to be fixed before we can start the transition? Please give people few more days to speak up, I'd say until the end of this week. Team, We are then migrating away from libav, if you don't think this is the right thing to do or intend to propose alternatives, just speak up right now. Cheers! -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#789256: Bug#680745: fixed in cmus 2.5.0-7
Hi all, And thanks for sharing your thoughts. Ron, a great thanks goes to you for having clarified the rationale behind your original removal request [1]. While it might not be a common feature, it is a feature none the less. One that relies on functionalities provided by a factually dead software; please get rid of it. Meanwhile I'll be demoting cmus's libroar dependency from Recommends to Suggests. If roaraudio's maintainers do not show willingness to cooperate, then we'll hand this to the TC and see. Cheers. [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675610 -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Clarifications about the alleged transition to FFmpeg
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote: While the team has not announced a formal decision the majority of the team supports FFmpeg (which you don't ;-). I've never denied that: [1] However you have to give people enough time to ***think***, ***review*** things, and ***speak up*** if they wish to. It also not clear how the team can make a formal decision since there is no official leader, just members,not all listed members participated in the discussion. No one claims the leadership here, so you can't either I am afraid. From: https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia : Currently there are no strict roles defined. All members can work on all packages, although there is some sort of split. A list of people actively involved in the packaging effort can be found here Correct, nevertheless other members of the team on IRC expressed some doubts about the subtle message conveyed by your blog post's title: Debian is preparing the transition to FFmpeg! - not to mention other parts of the contents (Ending an era of shipping Libav [...] the Debian Multimedia Team is working out the last details of switching to FFmpeg). I do believe that a different wording wouldn't have caused the same reactions. Cheers. (I won't reply again, I'm pretty fed up with all this and hope it will come to an end soon) [1] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/2015-June/044671.html -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Processing of lv2core_6.0+dfsg0-3_amd64.changes
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Debian FTP Masters ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org wrote: lv2core_6.0+dfsg0-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost Why? That package should just be dropped, not updated. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#772264: [PATCH] din: Fix bashism in data/m00
Hi there, I've applied the attached patch to the Debian's din package to fix a small issue [1], and I thought you might be interested in doing the same. Thanks for considering. Cheers! [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=772264 -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A Description: Fix bashism in data/m00 Replace 'echo' with 'printf' which is more portable and reliable when printing strings with backslashes. Author: Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/772264 Forwarded: j...@dinisnoise.org --- data/m00 |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- din.orig/data/m00 +++ din/data/m00 @@ -2,4 +2,4 @@ ACCEL=`xset q | grep accel | cut -d' ' -f5 |cut -d'/' -f1` THRESHOLD=`xset q | grep thres | cut -d' ' -f11` xset m 0 0 -echo \033[1;30m mouse parameters:`xset q | grep accel` \033[0m +printf \033[1;30m mouse parameters:%s \033[0m\n `xset q | grep accel` ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] invada-lv2/master: Patch forwarded.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com wrote: I forwarded them on .4.3.2014 to email fra...@arkhostings.com Well, in that case you should put that address into the Forwarded: field. Did they reply? -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] invada-lv2/master: Patch forwarded.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com wrote: 2015-06-11 16:03 GMT+02:00 Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org: On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com wrote: I forwarded them on .4.3.2014 to email fra...@arkhostings.com Well, in that case you should put that address into the Forwarded: field. I have never done that neither saw it in other's work ( but it can be coincidental ) ... Is it new practice? Ideally the value is an URL proving that it has been forwarded and where one can find more information about its inclusion status. http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/ -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] invada-lv2/master: Patch forwarded.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:58 PM, mira-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit 0af1ab82b34755ac4f370cef366754d105a3462f Author: Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@seznam.cz Date: Tue Mar 4 15:54:20 2014 +0100 Patch forwarded. Who was it forwarded to? -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Select provider of libav* libraries
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: No, neither the new input in the past couple weeks nor repition of old input have made me change opinion on the matter. Not mine, either. However, It seems pretty clear to me that the majority of those people who kindly took some time to reflect and speak about the matter would second a switch over to FFmpeg, so here is what will happen next: * Team members will have time until mid-week to speak up in favor or against this move. * If nothing relevant happens, I'll be sending a brief informal announce to debian-devel to share our opinion. Only one question now remains: is this team going to maintain FFmpeg? Cheers. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Select provider of libav* libraries
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote: What about the git hooks sending the commit mails to the list? I can't imaging it'll just work, or will it? Ah, nice catch. I haven't played too much with the hooks, that's why I'd feel more comfortable in: 1. creating the empty repo 2. add a new remote 3. push everything to the new remote I can create the new empty pkg-multimedia/ffmpeg.git for you if you wish so, so that you can handle the rest eventually. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Select provider of libav* libraries
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote: I hope creating these wiki pages won't delay the switch. And it'll save me from having to explain my point of view another time, because I can just point to the wiki. We should have created such pages long ago actually. Better late than never though. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Select provider of libav* libraries
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 3:54 PM, umläute zmoel...@umlaeute.mur.at wrote: On 2015-06-01 16:49, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: Does someone know what would be the best way to move the repository? $ cd /git/collab-maint $ mv ffmpeg.git /etc/pkg-multimedia $ ln -s /etc/pkg-multimedia/ffmpeg.git . should I do it? Both this and Fabian's should be fine, I'd double check directories and files permissions at the end of the procedure too. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Select provider of libav* libraries
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote: Does someone know what would be the best way to move the repository? Just move the directory? Or add a new remote and push everything to it. I'd also suggest to ask for the removal of the old one - to save disk space. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Select provider of libav* libraries
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote: 2015-05-30 23:54 GMT+02:00 Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com: Where is Reinhard's original mail? I can't find it. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Select provider of libav* libraries
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Dmitry Smirnov only...@debian.org wrote: Thanks for insight into upstream security situation, Balint. So what would be the next step? Mass bug filings? Shall we draft a template here? Wait for Reinhard to come back up with news from libav side. Then, if nothing relevant happens, I think we'll be releasing a sort of team announcement to state that the majority of us would either second or not second the switch over to ffmpeg. Cheers. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Request to Join Project Debian JavaScript Maintainers from Julien Puydt (jpuydt-guest)
Jonas, On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript Ah-ehm :) -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: multiple uploaders
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@debian.org wrote: Am Dienstag, den 26.05.2015, 14:38 +0200 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher: I think the rule is useless. It doesn't prevent us from having two persons on Uploaders and both are MIA. I'd rather orphan/remove the packages from the team that are clearly no longer maintained and nobody in the team cares about them anymore. ACK from me. Cheers! -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Select provider of libav* libraries
Ciao Alessandro, and thanks for sharing your thoughts, it's genuinely appreciated. On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Alessandro Ghedini gh...@debian.org wrote: And it's already clear that libav just doesn't provide enough security coverage, Can you please elaborate? AFAICS the versions in oldstable (0.8.17) and stable (11.3) are actively maintained upstream. Honestly that looks quite enough of security support. I'm implying that users have been asking for what they need (ffmpeg) for a long time, and Debian isn't providing it. Well, that is an alleged opinion, not fact. Conversely libav backers couldn't say that we are giving the users all what they really really want and need. So please let's all just refrain from taking this as we're 100% to have joined the battle on the right side ;) Cheers! -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Select provider of libav* libraries
Hi, Admittedly seems there is more activity on FFmpeg's than libav's side. It does not necessarily reflect into higher quality though - plus, libav is not dead at all as they're still releasing new versions and providing support and fixes for a number of stable branches. I'm personally getting very well with libav and apparently it is enough to meet all my needs too. Nevertheless others are encountering issues that they claim are solved with FFmpeg, so that might be a solution which could make many users happy. I'm not going to vote on this now as I really need to hear an opinion from the libav's current maintainer, Reinhard Tartler. I genuinely believe that we all need to hear an opinion from him before taking any further action. Cheers. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Select provider of libav* libraries
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote: It seemed like a clear consensus, since no further discussion happened. I hadn't expected that Reinhard was unaware of the discussion. Alright, let me fix this then by changing my mind on the subject (and giving us more time to debate): I vote for libav to stay until very compelling reasons to switch to ffmpeg are provided. There is no room for statements like clear consensus now - by definition. Once again: please do not push people to make rushed decisions. There is no need to rush at all. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Select provider of libav* libraries
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote: But since there seems to be a clear consensus in favor of switching to FFmpeg in Debian where did you get that impression from? Very interesting question as it's pretty in clear view that *there is no consensus* on this matter, just personal preferences. On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@debian.org wrote: Thanks for copying me on this email. It seems that I was automatically unsubscribed from that email on May 1 due to excessive bounces, and failed to notice that. I've resubscribed myself now. I actually suspected that you were no longer on the list, I'm very happy to have done a good thing. And please take your time, there is no need to make rushed decisions. Cheers. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Select provider of libav* libraries
On 4 May 2015 10:40, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote: So I am asking you: Should we ship libav or FFmpeg? Can we reach a consensus on this topic? Please cast your vote before Friday noon (8th May) with a brief explanation if you would like to participate in the decision. Please refrain to push people to make rushed decisions. It's not up to you to decide how long it should take us to decide nor opening/closing polls. So folks, please just ignore Balint's above lines and leave your comments/votes. I'll post my opinion as soon as possible - I'm travelling back home right now. Cheers. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Select provider of libav* libraries
'Evening Ladies and Gentlemen, I am afraid that I have to revive this discussion once again now that Jessie is out as we have plenty of time before starting doing any major work for Stretch: it's really the right time to make a final decision about this subject. The need to get this dichotomy solved may be found in Moritz's last email: On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote: To properly migrate over a daemon they need to co-exist for a stable release, while a lib does not. Stretch will only have one of them. [snip] Having both for a year along each other will only waste people's time. Now at the beginning of the release cycle is the time to make a decision, not by dragging things into a year as of today. Picking one of the two won't be any simpler in 12 months. It appears clear to me that the security team wouldn't be too happy to support both FFmpeg and libav: Therefore the question still remains: On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org wrote: So I am asking you: Should we ship libav or FFmpeg? Can we reach a consensus on this topic? Cheers. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: packaging: python-soundfile
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 8:11 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) umlae...@debian.org wrote: i would like to package python-soundfile [1], a python audio processing library wrapping libsndfile. i would prefer to do this under our team umbrella, so if anybody is interested please speak up. Here I come! -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Orphaning gmtk + gnome-mplayer + gecko-mediaplayer
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Sebastian Ramacher sramac...@debian.org wrote: Hi, since upstream development of gmtk, gnome-mplayer and gecko-mediaplayer has stopped some years ago, I'm thinking of orphaning all three packages. I'm not longer using them and lost interest in them. Are any of my fellow Uploaders or somebody else from team still interested in these packages? If upstream's lost interest, unless some one speaks up please do kill them then. There are too many alternatives out there in the wild. Cheers! -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Fix versioning in eq10q package
It should work now. Update the changelog accordingly please. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Fix versioning in eq10q package
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com wrote: I am using get-orig-source in rules file ... can someone more skilled help me to do it during repacking? Done. Cheers. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: presentation - new member
Hi, On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: Hi Mattia, Welcome onboard Mattia! Please make sure you've gone through our packaging guidelines [1] before you start. They're just a brief list of the common good practices we tend to apply on our every day tasks and I'm sure you won't find anything hard to learn or really new to you. I'd recommend you to pay particular attention on the workflow guidelines [2] though as that stanza represents perhaps the set of stricter rules we do stick to. Hope you enjoy your stay, and have a nice rest. Cheers! [1] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/DevelopPackaging [2] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/DevelopPackaging#Workflow_guidelines -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#780041: ITP: ffmulticonverter -- graphical multi format converter
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org * Package name: ffmulticonverter Version : 1.7.0 Upstream Author : Ilias Stamatis stamatis.iliass at gmail dot com * URL : https://sites.google.com/site/ffmulticonverter/ * License : GPL-3 Programming Lang: Python Description : graphical multi format converter FF Multi Converter is a simple graphical application which enables the user to convert audio, video, image and document files between all popular formats by using and combining other programs. It uses avconv for audio/video files, unoconv for document files and ImageMagick for image file conversions. . The goal of FF Multi Converter is to gather the most popular multimedia types in one application and provide conversion options for them easily through a user-friendly interface. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Bug#780041: ITP: ffmulticonverter -- graphical multi format converter
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org wrote: * Package name: ffmulticonverter Version : 1.7.0 Upstream Author : Ilias Stamatis stamatis.iliass at gmail dot com * URL : https://sites.google.com/site/ffmulticonverter/ * License : GPL-3 Programming Lang: Python Description : graphical multi format converter FF Multi Converter is a simple graphical application which enables the user to convert audio, video, image and document files between all popular formats by using and combining other programs. It uses avconv for audio/video files, unoconv for document files and ImageMagick for image file conversions. . The goal of FF Multi Converter is to gather the most popular multimedia types in one application and provide conversion options for them easily through a user-friendly interface. Additional Uploaders anyone? -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#778866: RE: read in movie-title failing
Hi Sean,
I haven't seen your e-mail before, sorry about that.
Thanks for the patch, though I'd prefer to set #!/bin/bash as shebang
rather than applying your patch though as there's plenty of bashisms
in the whole script:
alessio@soqtl021:~/devel/videotrans/src$ checkbashisms -f -n -p -x
movie-title.in
possible bashism in movie-title.in line 97 (echo -n):
echo -n `shellescape $@`
possible bashism in movie-title.in line 205 (test -a/-o):
if [ -e ${OUTPUT} -a ! -f ${OUTPUT} ]
possible bashism in movie-title.in line 283 (test -a/-o):
if [ ${xx} = 720 -a ${yy} = 576 ]
possible bashism in movie-title.in line 287 (test -a/-o):
elif [ ${xx} = 720 -a ${yy} = 480 ]
possible bashism in movie-title.in line 305 (test -a/-o):
if [ ${animated} != animated -a ${animated} != static -a \
${animated} != none ]
possible bashism in movie-title.in line 525 (test -a/-o):
if [ ${animated} = animated -a ${num_title_frames} -gt 1 ]
possible bashism in movie-title.in line 530 (test -a/-o):
elif [ ${num_title_frames} = 1 -a ${audio_length} -gt 0 \
-a ${animated} = animated ]
possible bashism in movie-title.in line 694 (test -a/-o):
elif [ ${audio_length} -gt 0 -a ${animated} = animated ]
possible bashism in movie-title.in line 800 (echo -n):
echo -n . 2
possible bashism in movie-title.in line 879 (test -a/-o):
if [ ${num_title_frames} = 1 -a ${audio_length} -gt 0 -a \
${animated} != animated ]
possible bashism in movie-title.in line 1395 (test -a/-o):
if [ ${num_title_frames} = 1 -a ${audio_length} = 0 ]
Cheers.
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org
Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com
0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#778866: videotrans: movie-title terminates without doing anything
severity 778866 important thanks Hi, Thanks for reporting this issue and trying to make Debian better. On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Sven Bartscher sven.bartsc...@weltraumschlangen.de wrote: I converted to mp4 files with movie-to-dvd movie1.mp4 movie2.mp4. I made a background with movie-make-title-simple -o title -m pal Then I tried to create the .vob with movie-title -o title.vob -t title movie1.m2v movie2.m2v, but that didn't have any effect. Not having any effect means that there was no output or files generated or anything else. Tje program just stops imediately without any message and the exit code 1. Doing some debugging I figured out that the script terminates at a read in line 279, but couldn't figure out why. Please run the script again via bash with the '-x' option added to the command line, e.g.: $ bash -x movie-title -o title.vob -t title movie1.m2v movie2.m2v Thanks in advance. Cheers! -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#776301: New upstream release: 0.5.2
Source: gpac Severity: wishlist Upstream has released a new version: https://github.com/gpac/gpac/tree/v0.5.2 Cheers. -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers utopic-updates APT policy: (500, 'utopic-updates'), (500, 'utopic-security'), (500, 'utopic'), (100, 'utopic-backports') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-28-generic (SMP w/20 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Request to Join Project Debian Multimedia Maintainers from Axel Beckert (abe)
Hey team, On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 4:15 PM, nore...@alioth.debian.org wrote: I'd like to join the team for packaging vlevel (see #774230) under the team's umbrella. I've just had the pleasure to accept Axel's join request on Alioth, he intends to package vlevel, a LADSPA plugin. Please give him a warm welcome! Cheers, -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#773450: can't run laborejo-qt because of ImportError
severity 773450 important tags 773450 moreinfo thanks Hi, On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Félix Sipma felix+deb...@gueux.org wrote: ImportError: /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/PyQt4/QtCore.so: undefined symbol: PyString_Type Sorry but I can't reproduce it here. Could you please show me the result fo the following command? head /usr/bin/laborejo-qt Would you please test running laborejo-qt as follows? python3 /usr/bin/laborejo-qt Thanks. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#772520: mjpegtools: yuvscaler is lost
On 8 Dec 2014 08:52, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote: Am Montag, den 08.12.2014, 05:14 +0100 schrieb diego: I'm using LiVES to create a clip but when I choose mjpegtools_encoder it says that yuvscaler was not found This was removed by Alessio in http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-multimedia/mjpegtools.git/commit/?id=c5a773754ba762995b105abd3f8d5c0e8220897c Maybe by accident? Oh yes, it was me, I wanted to add y4mshift to the list of binaries and dunno why I ended up removing yuvscaler. Fabian, could you please fix it for me? I'm traveling now and have no idea whether I'll find some time to do it myself today. -- Alessio ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#772520: mjpegtools: yuvscaler is lost
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote: Am Montag, den 08.12.2014, 09:58 + schrieb Alessio Treglia: Fabian, could you please fix it for me? Uploaded. Thanks! I guess we should file an unblock request, this is a clear regression. What do you think about that? -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#772403: Patch
tags 772403 patch
thanks
Hi,
Attaching the patch committed to git for public review.
Cheers.
diff --git a/debian/rotter.init b/debian/rotter.init
index 1b9c15c..663da74 100644
--- a/debian/rotter.init
+++ b/debian/rotter.init
@@ -33,6 +33,10 @@ test -f $DAEMON || exit 0
. /lib/lsb/init-functions
+sleep() {
+ env - /bin/sleep $1
+}
+
case $1 in
start)
if test -e $PIDFILE ; then
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org
Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com
0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#771179: Please support mpv
Package: ogmrip Severity: wishlist Tags: upstream Hi, This is just a cross reference to keep track of the progress of the development of this feature. Seems upstream is working on it. Cheers. -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.7 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (990, 'stable-updates'), (990, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable-updates'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable'), (50, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/12 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#770076: TypeError: feed() takes exactly 2 arguments (3 given)
Hey Iain, On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Iain Lane i...@orangesquash.org.uk wrote: Attached is a patch to fix this. I'm going to upload to Ubuntu, along with switching to gir1.2-vte-2.91. If you fix this in Debian, feel free to sync. :) Thanks a lot for the patch! Would you mind to apply it to the git's repository too please? Cheers! -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#769541: ams: please add the 'Atte-Jensen-instrumentpatches' to the Ams package
tags 769541 moreinfo thanks Please clarify copyright and licensing. Cheers. sent via mobile ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#769541: ams: please add the 'Atte-Jensen-instrumentpatches' to the Ams package
The GPL license has specific requirements (e.g. verbatim copy of the license shipped with the sources). We need a tarball with sources *and* a copy of the license as released by upstream. sent via mobile ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Bits from the Debian Multimedia Team [RELOADED]
Hi, Yep, I've planned to publish it to Planet Debian around lunchtime today (London time) Cheers! sent via mobile ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#762770: lives cannot find any encoders on startup
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Wookey woo...@wookware.org wrote: Changing the lib_dir in the ~/.lives file from /usr/lib/ to /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ (on this machine) solves the issue: So, essentially you're saying that the very first time you launch lives, it creates the config file and then stores file a wrong plugins path into it. I can't reproduce it now but it sounds likely to me. I'm CC'ing the upstream maintainer to get his opinion on this. Cheers! -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Bits from the Debian Multimedia Team [RELOADED]
Yes, please add them. sent via mobile ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Bits from the Debian Multimedia Team [RELOADED]
Team, I guess you've noticed the announcement in d-d-a, and I want to thank you all for the great effort. Keep up the amazing work! :) Alessio sent via mobile ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Bits from the Debian Multimedia Team [RELOADED]
Gentlemen, It looks pretty good to me, anyone wants to give another proofreading? -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Ardour FTBFS hurd-i386
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, ardour FTBFS on hurd-i386 Should we build it only linux-any kfreebsd-any ? Just leave it as it is now. AFAICS the package has never successfully built on hurd (i.e. can't be hit by RC bugs for it). Cheers. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Bug#765515: Removed package(s) from unstable
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Debian FTP Masters ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org wrote: Version: 0.7.4-5+rm Dear submitter, as the package beast has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/765515 This isn't documented in the bitsfrom page... is this intended? -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Bug#765515: Removed package(s) from unstable
Hi, and sorry for the empty mail. On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote: This isn't documented in the bitsfrom page... is this intended? Yes, it is. It should be mentioned in our Bits too. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
