libsoundio packaging
I've completed libsoundio packaging with one little hiccup, which I've emailed debian-devel about. GNUInstallDirs seems to not be giving an arch triplet for the install directory. Anyway once that is done, libsoundio packaging is complete. Will you be a sponsor, Felipe? I got my key signed by a debian developer, so I can resume the process of becoming a Debian Maintainer. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#798739: cmake: GNUInstallDirs reports CMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR as "lib" instead of "lib/$triplet"
Package: cmake
Version: 3.2.2-2+b1
Severity: important
Here is a simple CMakeLists.txt file:
include(GNUInstallDirs)
message("lib: ${CMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR}")
It outputs: "lib: lib". No arch triplet.
I also tested this with cmake from experimental, currently version
3.3.1.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 4.1.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Versions of packages cmake depends on:
ii cmake-data 3.2.2-2
ii dpkg 1.18.2
ii libarchive13 3.1.2-11+b1
ii libc6 2.19-19
ii libcurl3 7.44.0-1
ii libexpat1 2.1.0-7
ii libgcc11:5.2.1-17
ii libjsoncpp0v5 0.10.5-1
ii libstdc++6 5.2.1-17
ii procps 2:3.3.10-4
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.8.dfsg-2+b1
Versions of packages cmake recommends:
ii gcc 4:5.2.1-4
ii make 4.0-8.2
Versions of packages cmake suggests:
pn codeblocks
pn eclipse
pn ninja-build
-- no debconf information
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: libsoundio packaging
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:03 AM, Andrew Kelley <superjo...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've completed libsoundio packaging with one little hiccup, which I've > emailed debian-devel about. GNUInstallDirs seems to not be giving an arch > triplet for the install directory. > > Anyway once that is done, libsoundio packaging is complete. > > Will you be a sponsor, Felipe? > > I got my key signed by a debian developer, so I can resume the process of > becoming a Debian Maintainer. > Alright, the GNUInstallDirs issue is fixed and the libsoundio package is ready to be tagged and uploaded to FTP masters. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Fwd: Thank YOU! GrooveBasin
Happy Groove Basin user :-) Not a Debian user but still, I thought it would be nice to see a happy user of a project packaged by the Multimedia Team. -- Forwarded message -- From: kevin folz kevinf...@gmail.com Date: Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:54 AM Subject: Thank YOU! GrooveBasin To: superjo...@gmail.com Where can I help / donate $$ to this project. You sir need a beer on me. Honestly, I have been searching for the perfect (linux) media player for 3 years... and so happy to have found you. I just installed 1.5.0 on arch linux. BLOWN AWAY! I am also a software engineer... and thats a problem, hard to settle on crap software, that you know you would make differently. your software is EXACTLY how I would make it. Searching through the library, most software fails at searching for file/folder names! Some modify your music folder / add metadata (awful). Groove '/' keyboard shortcut + random_folder_name + 'enter' BAM! LOVE IT! I used Winamp on Windows for 10 years+, the simple playlist first UI is what I liked+ Jump To File for queue but I use Linux at work since 2011. I also have 33,000 songs, so very few players survive. My Carputer (arch + bluetooth + pulse) - car stereo will also switch to this (vs audacious) as I now have an android app (MPDroid) to control it :D :D Bluez doesn't support AVRCP properly yet either so a simple tablet mounted to dash will work just fine. Audacious (with search tool plugin) in Ubuntu comes close, but lacks Web UI / Android apps. Mpris is an awesome protocol though. http://specifications.freedesktop.org/mpris-spec/latest/ My only todo, is implementing global hotkeys... I should be able to rig that through window manger - mpd console cmd, I would hope? Your biggest fan, sorry for the long email, I am SUPER excited. -Kevin pps. love the streaming! I actually don't need to bring my USB HDD to work anymore ! Much awesome. Such respect. Wow! ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#764374: libgroove: FTBFS on hurd-i386
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Pino Toscano p...@debian.org wrote: On 2014-10-07 18:42, Svante Signell wrote: Source: libgroove Version: 4.2.0-1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Hi, libgroove fails to build on GNU/Hurd due to a name clash with OSX, both are defining the __MACH__ keyword. --- a/grooveplayer/osx_time_shim.h 2014-09-25 17:26:09.0 +0200 +++ b/grooveplayer/osx_time_shim.h 2014-10-07 18:27:30.0 +0200 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ #ifndef GROOVE_MACH_TIME_H_INCLUDED #define GROOVE_MACH_TIME_H_INCLUDED -#ifdef __MACH__ +#if defined(__MACH__) !defined(__GNU__) #include sys/types.h #include sys/_types/_timespec.h This file is definitely OSX-specific, so the above preprocessor condition is too loose; it should be __MACH__ and __APPLE__, or simply just __APPLE__. Thank you for the report and the patch. libgroove upstream released 4.2.1 which resolves this problem. The libgroove Debian package is updated to this new release and is ready for upload. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Bits from the Debian Multimedia Team [RELOADED]
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote: Groove Basin is on track to be uploaded before the freeze. I'm hoping this is something users could be excited about. It has just been uploaded. Lets hope ftp-master can review it before the freeze. Let us hope. Meanwhile I added it to the wiki. Feel free to edit if it's too long. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Bits from the Debian Multimedia Team [RELOADED]
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org wrote: I know that it's a quite boring thing to do but IMHO we'd do a great service to all our users by releasing an update on what they'll find on Jessie. I'll try to allocate some time tomorrow to do my bits (LV2, various libs and programs), I would also love to see updates on: - Jack (Adrian?) - Libav (Reinhard?) - XBMC (Balínt?) - MPV (Alessandro?) - Mediatomb (Hector?) - VLC (Benjamin?) - Handbrake (Sebastian?) Jonas, Jaromír, Matteo, Stuart et al : anything to declare? :) Groove Basin https://github.com/andrewrk/groovebasin is on track to be uploaded before the freeze. I'm hoping this is something users could be excited about. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#758350: libgroove: Use pkg-config to determine FFmpeg linker flags
Thank you for your patch Andreas. This library has been developed exclusively against libav. I have only tested this library against ffmpeg one time, and when I did, it segfaulted. I'm having a hard time understanding why I should make the package and build script more complicated for an unsupported library that is not even in experimental yet. Please close the bug and re-open when ffmpeg is in experimental or unstable. Regards, Andrew On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote: Source: libgroove Version: 4.1.1+dfsg-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Usertags: reintroducing-ffmpeg Dear maintainer, I am working on reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian [1-2]. In order to make FFmpeg co-installable with Libav, the libraries were renamed to lib*-ffmpeg. Thus using linker flags like '-lavcodec' doesn't work with the FFmpeg packages. To get the correct linking flags for both FFmpeg and Libav, one can (and should) use pkg-config. Attached patch achieves that for this package. Please apply it to facilitate building your package with FFmpeg in Debian. If you want to facilitate this even further, you can also add lib*-ffmpeg-dev alternatives to the Libav build-dependencies. While the FFmpeg package is still waiting in the NEW queue [3], it can already be built from the git repository [4]. Best regards, Andreas 1: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/07/msg01010.html 2: https://bugs.debian.org/729203 3: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/ffmpeg_7:2.3.1-1.html 4: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/ffmpeg.git ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Possibly new people on board
Let's get some more Andrews in this email thread ;-) On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote: On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Andrew Shadura and...@shadura.me wrote: Hello everyone, I've learnt recently that Andrei Alin (better known as Andrew Webupd8) is maintaining an unofficial PPA for Ubuntu with Audacious and other multimedia packages, and have invited him to participate in the maintenance of official packages in Debian. He doesn't have any contributions to Debian yet, but it seems that he has some good experience with Debian packaging, even if it may be not very compliant with the Policy (I haven't checked his packages thoroughly, but they seem mostly fine). I think he may start with finishing the packaging of Audacious 3.5 in Debian by porting the changes from his private PPA, with help and guidance from me and people on the Multimedia Team. So please welcome him and help him to become a part of the team :) Welcome! Please read the team wiki[1], and apply to the project in alioth! [1] wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: hello! I would like to join the pkg-multimedia team
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote: It seems your computer is somewhat outdated, I get 69 distinct packages. Is that Debian Testing? Would Debian approve of this? What do you mean approve of this? I mean - would Debian accept the upload of so many new packages? Surely all the deps are free software? If you mean bundling, that is very likely to be frowned upon. Yes they are all free software and I do not mean bundling. However, the more important issue is that several of the dependencies have conflicting requirements. Possibly the requirements are too strong, but I don't know. Hmm. I compiled the list of conflicts below. As a preliminary step I will submit a patch to each project in attempt to get them to update their dependencies to the latest. bl (~0.6.0) bl (~0.8.0) colors (0.5.x) colors (~0.6.0-1) colors (0.6.x) colors (0.x.x) debug (~0.7.2) debug (~0.8.0) iconv-lite (~0.2.11) iconv-lite (0.4.3) mime (~1.2.11) mime (1.2.5) nan (~0.3.0) nan (~0.6.0) readable-stream (~1.0.2) readable-stream (~1.0.24) readable-stream (~1.0.26) readable-stream (~1.0.26-4) readable-stream (1.0.27-1) readable-stream (~1.1.9) request (2.16.x) request (~2.34.0) underscore () underscore (~1.4.4) underscore (~1.6.0) xtend (~2.1.1) xtend (~3.0.0) xtend (~3.0.0) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] libav/experimental: update debian/changelog
Why is the libav 10 release in experimental? Shouldn't it go into unstable now? On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 12:00 PM, siret...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: The following commit has been merged in the experimental branch: commit 39cfd60ab4a68ca475bbf6fe7f639a47dfeb5e7a Author: Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de Date: Sun Mar 23 14:24:23 2014 -0400 update debian/changelog diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index b58543e..53b3612 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +libav (6:10-1) experimental; urgency=low + + * New upstream release 10. Full changelog avaialble at: + http://git.libav.org/?p=libav.git;a=blob;f=Changelog;hb=refs/tags/v10_beta2 + + -- Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de Sun, 23 Mar 2014 14:23:55 -0400 + libav (6:10~beta2-2) experimental; urgency=low * Drop unnecessary packages: libavformat-extra-, libavutil-extra, -- Libav/FFmpeg packaging ___ pkg-multimedia-commits mailing list pkg-multimedia-comm...@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-commits ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] libav/experimental: update debian/changelog
Never mind - Sebastinas pointed me to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739079 which explains everything. On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Andrew Kelley superjo...@gmail.comwrote: Why is the libav 10 release in experimental? Shouldn't it go into unstable now? On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 12:00 PM, siret...@users.alioth.debian.orgwrote: The following commit has been merged in the experimental branch: commit 39cfd60ab4a68ca475bbf6fe7f639a47dfeb5e7a Author: Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de Date: Sun Mar 23 14:24:23 2014 -0400 update debian/changelog diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index b58543e..53b3612 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +libav (6:10-1) experimental; urgency=low + + * New upstream release 10. Full changelog avaialble at: + http://git.libav.org/?p=libav.git;a=blob;f=Changelog;hb=refs/tags/v10_beta2 + + -- Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de Sun, 23 Mar 2014 14:23:55 -0400 + libav (6:10~beta2-2) experimental; urgency=low * Drop unnecessary packages: libavformat-extra-, libavutil-extra, -- Libav/FFmpeg packaging ___ pkg-multimedia-commits mailing list pkg-multimedia-comm...@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-commits ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: what does Debian Multimedia team think about uploading libgroove?
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Alessandro Ghedini gh...@debian.orgwrote: I just tagged and uploaded it. Feel free to contact me privately (at the gh...@debian.org address) or on the mailing list next time you need an upload. Cheers! Thank you for the help and the sponsorship. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: what does Debian Multimedia team think about uploading libgroove?
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote: As I said before, groovebasin looks cool. Are you planning on uploading it too? Yes I would love to do that. However, I don't think the software is quite ready yet. I'd like to reach a certain release milestone first. I'm interested, but a bit short on time. It might take me some time to go over the libgroove packaging. Looks like Alessandro beat you to it :-) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: what does Debian Multimedia team think about uploading libgroove?
Thank you for your feedback. I am working on addressing it. One question below: On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Alessandro Ghedini alessan...@ghedini.mewrote: This is usually done by adding a get-orig-source target to debian/rules that downloads the tarball using uscan, unpacks it, rm -rf the folder and repacks it. Do you know of a pkg-multimedia repository I can look at to see a good example of this? ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: what does Debian Multimedia team think about uploading libgroove?
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Andrew Kelley superjo...@gmail.com wrote: Do you know of a pkg-multimedia repository I can look at to see a good example of this? Never mind; I figured it out. I have only the *-dbg and the *.symbols left to do and then I will be back :-) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: what does Debian Multimedia team think about uploading libgroove?
Alessandro,
Again thank you for your feedback. I have addressed all of it.
What is the next step?
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Alessandro Ghedini
alessan...@ghedini.mewrote:
On sab, feb 22, 2014 at 10:49:45 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Andrew Kelley superjo...@gmail.com
wrote:
* Package name: libgroove
Version : 3.0.6-1
Upstream Author : Andrew Kelley superjo...@gmail.com
* URL : https://github.com/andrewrk/libgroove
* License : Expat
Section : libs
As I said before, groovebasin looks cool. Are you planning on uploading
it too?
I'm interested, but a bit short on time. It might take me some time to
go over the libgroove packaging.
I'm interested too (but I seem to have missed the original email from
Anrew).
So, I had a quick look at the packaging and it generally looks good, but
here
are a few comments:
* Since it requires libav10 to be built (e.g. libavutil/frame.h), you
should
note that in debian/control with appropriate versioned Build-Depends.
Build-Depends:
[...]
libavcodec-dev (= 6:10~),
libavfilter-dev (= 6:10~),
libavformat-dev (= 6:10~),
libavutil-dev (= 6:10~),
[...]
* While at it, there should be one Build-Depends per line, as per team
policy.
Build-Depends: a,
b,
c,
d
* The tarball downloaded with uscan --download-current-version is
different
from the one in the pristine-tar branch.
The difference seems to be that the upstream repository contains a deps/
folder
bundling the libraries needed to build it. The canonical Debian way to
handle
this would be to repack the upstream tarball removing the directories
(which is
what you did) but also providing an automated way to do that.
This is usually done by adding a get-orig-source target to debian/rules
that
downloads the tarball using uscan, unpacks it, rm -rf the folder and
repacks it.
Another way would be [0].
See Developer's Reference §6.7.8.2.
(I'm not quite sure if the team's packaging policy says anything about
this).
[0] http://pkg-perl.alioth.debian.org/howto/repacking.html
* The file downloaded by uscan gets called libgroove-3.0.6.tar.gz
instead
of libgroove-3.0.6.tar.gz (not really a problem but it's kinda ugly).
* Any reason why you are using version=2 instead of version=3 in
debian/watch?
* The comments in debian/rules added by dh_make should be removed.
* It'd be nice if you also provided *.symbols files for all the libraries
built,
see dpkg-gensymbols(1).
* It'd be nice if you provided -dbg packages for all the libraries built
(or a
single -dbg for all the libraries). This should be done e.g. by
overriding
dh_strip and calling it like dh_strip --dbg-package=libgroove3-dbg.
That's all I think, but I may still have missed something. Feel free to
ask if
you have any question.
Cheers
--
perl -E '$_=q;$/= @{[@_]};and s;\S+;inidehG ordnasselA;eg;say~~reverse'
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] libgroove/master: add debug package
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.comwrote: I'd rather name the package libgroove-dbg, i.e., leave the soname out, so that we don't need a new package name on the next soname bump. Good point. Fixed. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#739715: contains embedded copy of libebur128
Package: cantata Version: 1.1.3.ds1-1 Severity: normal cantata contains an embedded copy of libebur128. A libebur128 package is now in unstable and cantata package should declare a dependency on it and use the shared library. See Debian policy: https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch- source.html#s-embeddedfiles ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
what does Debian Multimedia team think about uploading libgroove?
Description: audio dispatching library (development files) This C library provides an sink-based API for decoding and encoding audio. It is intended to be used as a backend for music player applications, however it may also be used as a backend for any audio processing utility. I have packaged it here: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/libgroove.git;a=summary * Package name: libgroove Version : 3.0.6-1 Upstream Author : Andrew Kelley superjo...@gmail.com * URL : https://github.com/andrewrk/libgroove * License : Expat Section : libs It builds these binary packages: libgroove-dev - audio dispatching library (development files) libgroove3 - audio dispatching library libgrooveloudness-dev - loudness scanner sink for libgroove (development files) libgrooveloudness3 - loudness scanner sink for libgroove libgrooveplayer-dev - audio device playback sink for libgroove (development files) libgrooveplayer3 - audio device playback sink for libgroove Here are some examples of API usage: https://github.com/andrewrk/libgroove/tree/master/example And here is a music player application that depends on libgroove: https://github.com/andrewrk/groovebasin ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] libav/experimental: Follow upstreams new location for source-code examples for dh_installexamples
Is there a reason to decide one way or the other to put dh_installexamples into the debian/rules file versus creating a debian/package.examples file? On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 5:05 PM, siret...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: The following commit has been merged in the experimental branch: commit 7e2ac941689af2ddc0039eae5f4fcf6494708be1 Author: Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de Date: Mon Feb 17 22:04:38 2014 + Follow upstreams new location for source-code examples for dh_installexamples diff --git a/debian/libavcodec-dev.examples b/debian/libavcodec-dev.examples new file mode 100644 index 000..c272481 --- /dev/null +++ b/debian/libavcodec-dev.examples @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +doc/examples/*.c diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules index bbe4270..36d2dc7 100755 --- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ install: build $(DH_INSTALL_FILES) dh_installdocs -plibavcodec54 codecs.txt dh_installdocs -a doc/APIchanges install -m 644 -D debian-shared/doc/*.html doc/t2h.init debian/libav-tools/usr/share/doc/libav-tools - dh_installexamples -p libavcodec-dev libavcodec/api-example.c + dh_installexamples -a dh_installchangelogs -a Changelog $(foreach flavor,$(filter-out static,$(FLAVORS)),$(call install_flavor_extra,$(flavor))) env LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$(LD_LIBRARY_PATH):$(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/extra/usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH) \ -- Libav/FFmpeg packaging ___ pkg-multimedia-commits mailing list pkg-multimedia-comm...@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-commits ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: hello! I would like to join the pkg-multimedia team
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Sebastian Ramacher sramac...@debian.orgwrote: Please include the patch in the Debian package. OK I have done this and the copyright update. I also added your GNUInstallDirs patch. Please take a look and make sure it is correct. Lintian told me to add Pre-Depends: multiarch-support to the packages and so I did but I'd like to confirm with you that it is correct. Otherwise I'm happy with the package. A symbols file would be nice, but I can add that if you don't mind. By all means, please do. Thanks for all the help. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: hello! I would like to join the pkg-multimedia team
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote: I say welcome! I have added you to the alioth project. Great! :-) BTW, groovebasin looks cool, are you intending to package it? I would love to do that at some point but I do not think that the software is mature enough yet. However, in the process of working on groovebasin, I have packaged up some of its dependencies which I do think are mature enough. Namely libebur128 and the audio backend that I wrote - libgroove. On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Sebastian Ramacher sramac...@debian.orgwrote: If you intend to maintain libebur128 in the Multimedia Team, I'm happy to help you get it uploaded. I do. Thank you - I will take you up on your offer. Let me spend some time making sure that my repository / development methods comply with the pkg-multimedia team and then I will ask you. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: hello! I would like to join the pkg-multimedia team
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Sebastian Ramacher sramac...@debian.org wrote: If you intend to maintain libebur128 in the Multimedia Team, I'm happy to help you get it uploaded. Some of the wiki information seems to be outdated. In particular, it mentions that all packaging is done in http://git.debian.org/git/pkg-multimedia/ which seems to be not found. Thus I am humbly asking for advice on how to proceed. Here is the current state of affairs for me: * I am watching the mailing lists and trying to learn as much as possible by following along. * I have libebur128 packaged up and ready to go into unstable over here: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libgroove The packaging repository is currently https://github.com/andrewrk/libebur128 with the debian/* files in the debian branch. I am happy to move this to a pkg-multimedia -sanctioned repository and use the master branch for debian/* files and upstream branch for upstream as the wiki suggests. * I also would like to know if pkg-multimedia team is interested in libgroove, which is also packaged up on mentors and ready to go into experimental: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libgroove Since I am also the main upstream developer, the debian/* files are in the debian branch of the upstream git repository: https://github.com/andrewrk/libgroove Again I am happy to move this to a pkg-multimedia sanctioned repository etc. Any guidance? ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
hello! I would like to join the pkg-multimedia team
Hello everyone, I am Andrew Kelley. Some relevant things I have been working on: * Contributed to LMMS - http://lmms.sourceforge.net/ * Built a music player app - https://github.com/andrewrk/groovebasin * Packaged a library for computing the EBU R128 loudness standard: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libebur128 * Created an audio dispatching library: https://github.com/andrewrk/libgroove And packaged it: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libgroove * Actively contribute to various open source software: https://github.com/andrewrk * Contributions to libav - http://www.libav.org/ I have done the requested things: * created an alioth account: https://alioth.debian.org/users/andrewrk-guest/ * subscribed to the pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list * subscribed to the pkg-multimedia-commits mailing list * I have read the relevant guides FAQs about managing bugs in debian * I will do my best to provide useful reviews on others' work I have not yet contributed any patches to pkg-multimedia, but I hope to start. I love open source software! What do you say? ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
