[DRE-maint] [Bug 632902] Re: Sync libsexp-processor-ruby 3.0.4-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
** Changed in: libsexp-processor-ruby (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Stefano Rivera (stefanor) ** Changed in: libsexp-processor-ruby (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist ** Changed in: libsexp-processor-ruby (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: libsexp-processor-ruby (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed ** Changed in: libsexp-processor-ruby (Ubuntu) Assignee: Stefano Rivera (stefanor) = (unassigned) -- Sync libsexp-processor-ruby 3.0.4-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632902 You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to Ubuntu. Status in “libsexp-processor-ruby” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: Please sync libsexp-processor-ruby 3.0.4-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) as it fixes tests failure problem during build Changelog entries since current maverick version 3.0.4-1: libsexp-processor-ruby (3.0.4-2) unstable; urgency=low * Load tests with absolute path - Ruby 1.9.2 doesn't include '.' in it's load path anymore (Closes: #593026) * Standards-Version: 3.9.1 * Fixed package description -- Tobias Grimm et...@debian.org Sun, 15 Aug 2010 22:59:11 +0200 ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] Bug#594990: libhttpclient-ruby1.8: invalid HTTP header on some locales
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:20:17 +0200 Piviul wrote: Francesco Poli scrisse in data 06/09/2010 22:42: Please try the following workaround. [...] Ok, that's seems to work. [...] Yes, works! Great news! This means that we now have a temporary workaround for your issue. Now it's up to libhttpclient-ruby1.8 package maintainers to deal with the actual bug (fixing it and/or forwarding it upstream). Good luck! Thank you very much You're welcome, I was happy to help! ;-) Bye. -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/progs/scripts/pdebuild-hooks.html Need some pdebuild hook scripts? . Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4 pgpOFJEGZyGWE.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] [Bug 632902] Re: Sync libsexp-processor-ruby 3.0.4-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
This bug was fixed in the package libsexp-processor-ruby - 3.0.4-2 --- libsexp-processor-ruby (3.0.4-2) unstable; urgency=low * Load tests with absolute path - Ruby 1.9.2 doesn't include '.' in it's load path anymore (Closes: #593026) * Standards-Version: 3.9.1 * Fixed package description -- Bhavani Shankar bh...@ubuntu.com Sun, 15 Aug 2010 22:59:11 +0200 ** Changed in: libsexp-processor-ruby (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- Sync libsexp-processor-ruby 3.0.4-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632902 You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to Ubuntu. Status in “libsexp-processor-ruby” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: Please sync libsexp-processor-ruby 3.0.4-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) as it fixes tests failure problem during build Changelog entries since current maverick version 3.0.4-1: libsexp-processor-ruby (3.0.4-2) unstable; urgency=low * Load tests with absolute path - Ruby 1.9.2 doesn't include '.' in it's load path anymore (Closes: #593026) * Standards-Version: 3.9.1 * Fixed package description -- Tobias Grimm et...@debian.org Sun, 15 Aug 2010 22:59:11 +0200 ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] [Bug 583523] Re: rbot breaks in lucid upgrade
Workaround: 1. Install rubygems, and possible ruby-full 2. sudo gem install rake 3. sudo gem install gettext 4. sudo gem install rbot 5. cd /var/lib/gems/1.8/gems/rbot-0.9.15 6. sudo ./setup.rb Then run rbot, and it'll work. -- rbot breaks in lucid upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583523 You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to Ubuntu. Status in “rbot” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Binary package hint: rbot After upgrading to Lucid, starting rbot yields the following rbot D, [2010/05/20 16:37:14#10621] DEBUG -- ircbot.rb:124: debug test I, [2010/05/20 16:37:14#10621] INFO -- ircbot.rb:125: log test W, [2010/05/20 16:37:14#10621] WARN -- ircbot.rb:126: warning test E, [2010/05/20 16:37:14#10621] ERROR -- ircbot.rb:127: error test F, [2010/05/20 16:37:14#10621] FATAL -- ircbot.rb:128: fatal test D, [2010/05/20 16:37:14#10621] DEBUG -- rbotconfig.rb:28: trying to load rubygems D, [2010/05/20 16:37:15#10621] DEBUG -- rbotconfig.rb:35: loaded rubygems, looking for rbot version 0.9.14 (rbot-0.9.14) D, [2010/05/20 16:37:15#10621] DEBUG -- rbotconfig.rb:37: got gem D, [2010/05/20 16:37:15#10621] DEBUG -- rbotconfig.rb:43: not installed via rubygems /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rbot/load-gettext.rb:25: undefined method `add_default_locale_path' for main:Object (NoMethodError) from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `gem_original_require' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rbot/ircbot.rb:135 from /usr/bin/rbot:94:in `require' from /usr/bin/rbot:94 ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] libhpricot-ruby REMOVED from testing
FYI: The status of the libhpricot-ruby source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.8.2-1 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/jcristau # 20100908; done 20100908 The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals. -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] libfeedtools-ruby REMOVED from testing
FYI: The status of the libfeedtools-ruby source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.2.29+dfsg1-4 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/jcristau # 20100908; done 20100908 The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals. -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
[DRE-maint] Please UNremove libhpricot-ruby, dh-make-drupal, amrita2, libfeedtools-ruby from testing
severity 534721 important tags 534721 + upstream thanks Hi, As I stated in the bug report - Although the bug _is_ still present, it is _not_ of critical severity. This bug does _not_ warrant libhpricot-ruby (and the packages depending on it) to be removed from testing. There is, yes, a patch pending on this bug report - I am not the maintainer, and I prefer not to NMU it. The package, as it is, works for most of its use cases, and should not be dropped from testing. I am downgrading its severity - as I already said, this bug does not warrant being marked as grave or serious, as the package is -by far- not rendered unusable. Thanks, signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
