Re: request for advice about udev rule consequences
Michael Biebl dixit: > Whether it's safe to grant access to /dev/uinput (to local, active users) is > probably better answered by the kernel maintainers or the maintainer of that > specific subsystem. Hm, maybe. But, given my lack of familiarity with udev, does it indeed give that access to local, active users only? That was my point of where I’m not sure about. Thanks, //mirabilos -- > Hi, does anyone sell openbsd stickers by themselves and not packaged > with other products? No, the only way I've seen them sold is for $40 with a free OpenBSD CD. -- Haroon Khalid and Steve Shockley in gmane.os.openbsd.misc
Re: request for advice about udev rule consequences
Am 25.02.22 um 21:02 schrieb Thorsten Glaser: Hi, antimicro’ new upstream version wants to install the following udev rule file: #Enable user access to keyboard using uinput event generator SUBSYSTEM=="misc", KERNEL=="uinput", TAG+="uaccess" What exactly are the consequences of this? Should I warn users, or is this safe (current console user only), or what? Whether it's safe to grant access to /dev/uinput (to local, active users) is probably better answered by the kernel maintainers or the maintainer of that specific subsystem. OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
request for advice about udev rule consequences
Hi, antimicro’ new upstream version wants to install the following udev rule file: #Enable user access to keyboard using uinput event generator SUBSYSTEM=="misc", KERNEL=="uinput", TAG+="uaccess" What exactly are the consequences of this? Should I warn users, or is this safe (current console user only), or what? Thanks in advance, //mirabilos -- 15:39⎜«mika:#grml» mira|AO: "mit XFree86® wär’ das nicht passiert" - muhaha 15:48⎜ also warum machen die xorg Jungs eigentlich alles kaputt? :)15:49⎜ thkoehler: weil sie als Kinder nie den gebauten Turm selber umschmeissen durften? -- ~/.Xmodmap wonders…
