Re: [Pound Mailing List]
I believe that pound enables compression of ssl by default but it can be disabled via a patched version and a recompile, see this thread: http://www.apsis.ch/pound/pound_list/archive/2012/2012-10/1349447985000/index_html?fullMode=1 /A On 2013-09-18 14:04, Corrigan, Coleman wrote: Hello, a recent Ubuntu security fix to openssl for CVE-2012-4929, which turns off zlib compression of tls/ssl by default. It requires OPENSSL_DEFAULT_ZLIB to be set in the environment before loading openssl, if you want to re-enable the feature. I would like to know if pound has, or is planning to introduce, a configuration option to enable zlib compression for ssl connections ? Regards, Coleman Corrigan. -- To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to pound@apsis.ch. Please contact ro...@apsis.ch for questions. -- Alan McGinlay UNIX Network 0707731527 -- To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to pound@apsis.ch. Please contact ro...@apsis.ch for questions.
Re: [Pound Mailing List] Err503: Unknown directive?
Perhaps you could post a complete (sanitised) version of your pound.cfg and any imported files. /A On Wed 17 Jul 2013 11:51:07 CEST, Andreas Hilboll wrote: On 17.07.2013 11:20, Bussi Andrea wrote: On 07/17/2013 10:23 AM, Andreas Hilboll wrote: Hi, I want to configure an error page in my pound cfg. For that, I put the line Err503 /etc/pound/e503.html Is it inside a listener? No, it's not. But the manpage lists the Err50x directives as global directives, so I assume it sould *not* go inside a listener?! Do I understand something wrong? Is the manpage wrong? -- Andreas. -- To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to pound@apsis.ch. Please contact ro...@apsis.ch for questions. -- To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to pound@apsis.ch. Please contact ro...@apsis.ch for questions.
Re: [Pound Mailing List] How to publish one page in https, the others in http
This should do the trick: ListenHTTP Address IPADDR Port80 Service HeadRequire ^Host:\s*mywebsite.com.* URL /Login?user.* Redirect 301 https://mywebsite.com; End Service HeadRequire ^Host:\s*mywebsite.com.* BackEnd Address yournormalbackend Port80 End End End ListenHTTPS Address IPADDR Port443 Cert/etc/ssl/certs/cert.pem Service HeadRequire ^Host:\s*mywebsite.com.* URL /Login?user.* BackEnd Address yournormalbackend Port80 End End End That won't cover users trying to browse the rest of your site with https enabled, add another service for that. On 2013-06-28 14:08, PIEUX Emmanuel wrote: Good morning, I have a website to publish with Pound in http (ie http://mywebsite.com). I’d like the authentication page (http://mywebsite.com/authentication/Login?user) be published in https, and only this page. How could I do that with Pound (and is it possible…)? Sincerely Emmanuel Pieux *cid:image001.png@01CD9C8F.C7B90420 **Emmanuel PIEUX**– *Responsable de la sécurité des systèmes d’information * *Chambre de Commerce et d'Industrie de Grenoble 1, place André Malraux - BP 297 38016 GRENOBLE CEDEX 1 T. 04 76 70 64 06 – M. 06 22 96 19 63 **www.grenoble.cci.fr http://www.grenoble.cci.fr -- To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to pound@apsis.ch. Please contact ro...@apsis.ch for questions.
Re: [Pound Mailing List] How to publish one page in https, the others in http
Actually, just take out the URL check from the HTTPS listener and it will still work and your users will be able to browse the whole site with SSL if they so desire. Personally, I would just run the whole site behind SSL by default and redirect all non SSL requests to the ssl version. Overhead is minimal to say the least and you get a lot of benefits. It can solve issues of running say Varnish cache in front of drupal not working properly because of ssl as well. On fre 28 jun 2013 14:51:59, Alan McGinlay wrote: This should do the trick: ListenHTTP Address IPADDR Port80 Service HeadRequire ^Host:\s*mywebsite.com.* URL /Login?user.* Redirect 301 https://mywebsite.com; End Service HeadRequire ^Host:\s*mywebsite.com.* BackEnd Address yournormalbackend Port80 End End End ListenHTTPS Address IPADDR Port443 Cert/etc/ssl/certs/cert.pem Service HeadRequire ^Host:\s*mywebsite.com.* URL /Login?user.* BackEnd Address yournormalbackend Port80 End End End That won't cover users trying to browse the rest of your site with https enabled, add another service for that. On 2013-06-28 14:08, PIEUX Emmanuel wrote: Good morning, I have a website to publish with Pound in http (ie http://mywebsite.com). I’d like the authentication page (http://mywebsite.com/authentication/Login?user) be published in https, and only this page. How could I do that with Pound (and is it possible…)? Sincerely Emmanuel Pieux *cid:image001.png@01CD9C8F.C7B90420 **Emmanuel PIEUX**– *Responsable de la sécurité des systèmes d’information * *Chambre de Commerce et d'Industrie de Grenoble 1, place André Malraux - BP 297 38016 GRENOBLE CEDEX 1 T. 04 76 70 64 06 – M. 06 22 96 19 63 **www.grenoble.cci.fr http://www.grenoble.cci.fr -- To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to pound@apsis.ch. Please contact ro...@apsis.ch for questions. -- To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to pound@apsis.ch. Please contact ro...@apsis.ch for questions.
Re: [Pound Mailing List] How to publish one page in https, the others in http
In that case, if you don't want users to be able to browse the rest of the site with SSL enabled (even by their own manual choice) you could redirect them back to the non SSL site (unless the url is the login one.) On fre 28 jun 2013 15:39:52, PIEUX Emmanuel wrote: Thank you very much for this solution. I will try it as soon as possible. I'm agree with the fact that full ssl is better (and simpler) than this solution, but I have no choice... -Message d'origine- De : Alan McGinlay [mailto:al...@sics.se] Envoyé : vendredi 28 juin 2013 15:00 À : pound@apsis.ch Objet : Re: [Pound Mailing List] How to publish one page in https, the others in http Actually, just take out the URL check from the HTTPS listener and it will still work and your users will be able to browse the whole site with SSL if they so desire. Personally, I would just run the whole site behind SSL by default and redirect all non SSL requests to the ssl version. Overhead is minimal to say the least and you get a lot of benefits. It can solve issues of running say Varnish cache in front of drupal not working properly because of ssl as well. On fre 28 jun 2013 14:51:59, Alan McGinlay wrote: This should do the trick: ListenHTTP Address IPADDR Port80 Service HeadRequire ^Host:\s*mywebsite.com.* URL /Login?user.* Redirect 301 https://mywebsite.com; End Service HeadRequire ^Host:\s*mywebsite.com.* BackEnd Address yournormalbackend Port80 End End End ListenHTTPS Address IPADDR Port443 Cert/etc/ssl/certs/cert.pem Service HeadRequire ^Host:\s*mywebsite.com.* URL /Login?user.* BackEnd Address yournormalbackend Port80 End End End That won't cover users trying to browse the rest of your site with https enabled, add another service for that. On 2013-06-28 14:08, PIEUX Emmanuel wrote: Good morning, I have a website to publish with Pound in http (ie http://mywebsite.com). I’d like the authentication page (http://mywebsite.com/authentication/Login?user) be published in https, and only this page. How could I do that with Pound (and is it possible…)? Sincerely Emmanuel Pieux *cid:image001.png@01CD9C8F.C7B90420 **Emmanuel PIEUX**– *Responsable de la sécurité des systèmes d’information * *Chambre de Commerce et d'Industrie de Grenoble 1, place André Malraux - BP 297 38016 GRENOBLE CEDEX 1 T. 04 76 70 64 06 – M. 06 22 96 19 63 **www.grenoble.cci.fr http://www.grenoble.cci.fr -- To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to pound@apsis.ch. Please contact ro...@apsis.ch for questions. -- To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to pound@apsis.ch. Please contact ro...@apsis.ch for questions. N�r��zǧu�ޙ���+a���y�n�˛���m�h���u�l��!W���(�֜��,z��+ ��+�笶*'s=== -- To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to pound@apsis.ch. Please contact ro...@apsis.ch for questions.
Re: [Pound Mailing List] Current development status
I haven't posted much to the list so far but have tried to help out once or twice when I know the answer to a question, and have had questions of my own.. all of which have been answered. I also started a Puppet module a while back which I am using in production, it has more added to it than the one I announced before and needs a bit of polish, I will try and get it in a nice enough state to show. Overall, Pound *rocks* it's one of a few peices of Free Software which truly shine, it does exactly what it's supposed to do and it does it exceptionally well. +1 for github On tis 18 jun 2013 17:35:00, Joe Gooch wrote: Seems like I didn't have to chime in. :) Robert Segall is the maintainer... I haven't heard from him in awhile; I know his life is very busy. He has put out v2.7b which is the next beta branch. I maintain a github project with the source code at http://github.com/goochjj/pound/ Branches of note would be what Andreas posted from the prior thread, reposted here: My suggestion to anyone who needs PCI-DSS compliance is to run my branch here: https://github.com/goochjj/pound/tree/stage_for_upstream/v2.7b Zip here: https://github.com/goochjj/pound/archive/stage_for_upstream/v2.7b.zip This is based on 2.7b, and includes a bunch of patches that I usually include in pound, to do things like SNI, CertDir includes, IncludeDir, PCRE redirects, etc. If you don't feel comfortable running a 2.7 branch, or don't want to include those patches, I've rolled a new branch: https://github.com/goochjj/pound/tree/pcidss/v2.6 Zip here: https://github.com/goochjj/pound/archive/pcidss/v2.6.zip Which includes only the XSRF, SSLv2, SSL compression and cipher enhancements against a 2.6 baseline. My overall goal for Pound is I feel it's a great product that does exactly what it's designed to do, no less, no more. It's stable and I use it in multiple production environments for load balancing and SSL termination. Any features it hasn't been able to do, I've added over the years. It's also a product I'd like to see in continued use, and so I like to help out where I can, adding features, applying patches, keeping things secure (i.e. SSL fixes and such). That's why I maintain my branches... Because I see the merit and I want to be sure people using pound are covered. I'd love to see Pound gain more community support... perhaps moving to github as a primary distro, getting 2.7 polished and out the door and a bunch of things... Right now Robert's the only one we can make those sorts of decisions... and there are some bits that aren't available in releases that would need to be checked in. (things like the autoconf script source) I am by no means the only contributor and it'd be great to wrap more people around the project. As far as support, there are many people on this list who are active with config/production questions as well as code level support, so this project is very much alive. :) Joe -Original Message- From: Andreas Hilboll [mailto:li...@hilboll.de] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 9:09 AM To: pound@apsis.ch Cc: Scott McKeown Subject: Re: [Pound Mailing List] Current development status Hi, Joe stated the links to updated 2.6 and 2.7 branches in this thread: http://www.apsis.ch/pound/pound_list/archive/2013/2013- 04/136765000/index_html Cheers, Andreas. On 18.06.2013 14:55, Scott McKeown wrote: Hi Peter, Welcome to Pound. I'm sure that Joe will jump in at some stage with more details but we use Pound ourselves and you can find that the community is quite active and supportive. Patches and fixes are normally found being posted to this list which if you know some basic Unix commands and you don't mind building Pound from source yourself you can have quite an efficient and productive SSL Terminator at your disposal. If memory serves me correctly Joe does keep a fork somewhere but I don't know where it is. However, once again welcome to the group. ~Scott On 18 June 2013 13:45, Peter Shaw unthough...@googlemail.com mailto:unthough...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi pound users and developers. I just want to know if there is a acive development on the pound project. Or is the last Date in 2.6 (2010) the last and final commit? is this grub active? and may i get help if i ran my production farm with pound. Thanx al lot, ps -- To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to pound@apsis.ch mailto:pound@apsis.ch. Please contact ro...@apsis.ch mailto:ro...@apsis.ch for questions. -- With Kind Regards. Scott McKeown Loadbalancer.org http://www.loadbalancer.org -- To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to pound@apsis.ch. Please contact ro...@apsis.ch for questions. -- To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to pound@apsis.ch. Please contact ro...@apsis.ch for questions. -- To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to
Re: [Pound Mailing List] Too many redirects
Hmm, I'm not awesome at spotting that kind of issue (sounds like one of
those things you stare at for hours before noticing something really
obvious :) )
A good start would be to enable redirect logging in Apache as this will
tell you exactly what is going on:
RewriteLog /var/log/apache/rewrite.log
RewriteLogLevel 5 # higher numbers give more info, 5 is good start
Also, have you tried watching the headers during the requests? I use
firefox extension live http headers really great for finding this kind
of issue.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/live-http-headers/
Chrome has something similar but it's not as good.
My personal preference is to do those simple redirects in Pound, as you
are now doing, as it saves a pointless request to the backend.
Unfortunately Pound doesn't support paths in the destination
(url.com/path.html - url.com/newpath.html) or I would use it for all my
redirects.
/A
On 2013-06-19 10:03, Martijn de Dood wrote:
I've setup pound on my Debian Squeeze server (pound package from the
repository 2.5-1) with the following config:
## Minimal sample pound.cfg
##
## see pound(8) for details
##
## global options:
Userwww-data
Groupwww-data
#RootJail/chroot/pound
## Logging: (goes to syslog by default)
##0no logging
##1normal
##2extended
##3Apache-style (common log format)
LogLevel0
## check backend every X secs:
Alive30
## use hardware-accelleration card supported by openssl(1):
#SSLEnginehw
# poundctl control socket
Control /var/run/pound/poundctl.socket
##
## listen, redirect and ... to:
## redirect all requests on port 8080 (ListenHTTP) to the local
webserver (see Service below):
ListenHTTP
Address 111.111.111.111 # My external IP
Port80
## allow PUT and DELETE also (by default only GET, POST and HEAD)?:
xHTTP0
Service
BackEnd
Address127.0.0.1
Port80
End
End
End
Apache is running on localhost port 80.
When I visit my site via mysite.com all goes well. However when visiting
my site via www.mysite.com the browser replies with too many redirects.
The website on Apache has a .htaccess file which does the redirect from
www.mysite.com to mysite.com
RewriteCond %{HTTPS} !=on
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\.(.+)$ [NC]
RewriteRule ^ http://%1%{REQUEST_URI} [R=301,L]
If I setup nginx as a reverse proxy I don't get too many redirects when
requesting www, but I don't want nginx I like Pound more.
What could cause the problem of the loop?
I made a fix with this:
Service
HeadRequire ^Host: www.mysite.com$
Redirect 301 http://mysite.com;
End
But I would like to know why the loop occurs and if there is a other
solution.
--
To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to pound@apsis.ch.
Please contact ro...@apsis.ch for questions.
Re: [Pound Mailing List] Re: restarting pound with new config and session affinity (dynamically add a backend server)
This previous thread from 2007 touches on the subject with some good advice: http://www.apsis.ch/pound/pound_list/archive/2007/2007-09/118968985 Kristine, you mean like in most init scripts? Poundctl doesn't have reload as an option so neither does the init script (afaik) /a On mån 17 jun 2013 16:50:25, Kristine N. Putnam wrote: Have you tried using the reload command instead of restart? -Kristine *From: *Brad Allison brad.alli...@gmail.com *To: *pound@apsis.ch *Sent: *Monday, June 17, 2013 10:39:29 AM *Subject: *[Pound Mailing List] Re: restarting pound with new config and session affinity (dynamically add a backend server) Hello? Is this thing on? Someone hijacked my thread... but didn't answer my questions... On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Brad Allison brad.alli...@gmail.com mailto:brad.alli...@gmail.com wrote: We use session affinity that pound offers (Type=Header, ID=Host). But if we restart pound everyone goes to a different backend server than the one they had affinity for. 1- Now, we want to dynamically add a new pound server to the pound configuration, but we don't want to restart pound because again, everyone would be logged off our product if we did that. So how do we dynamically add in a new backend server without restarting pound? 2- Same question except this time removing a backend server. How do I remove a backend server from pound without restarting pound and losing all the session affinity? -brad -- To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to pound@apsis.ch. Please contact ro...@apsis.ch for questions.
Re: [Pound Mailing List] HTTP Listen Address as variable?
2013-01-25 13:19, Pat Erler skrev: hi, we like to have a pound server on standby in case the live server fails. problem is, that we can't keep the pound.cfg centralized as the HTTP/HTTPS Listen - Address line is server specific. is there a way to fill this variable with the `hostname` for instance? regards, PAT -- *Pat Erler* Gtalk/G+: per...@gmail.com mailto:per...@gmail.com mailto:per...@gmail.comSkype: pat_erler I am not actually sure if pound supports exactly what you are looking for. One alternative would be to use a virtual IP addres: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_IP_address I have done this in my previous job and it worked very well (although it wasn't with pound). YMMV! /A -- To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to pound@apsis.ch. Please contact ro...@apsis.ch for questions.
Re: [Pound Mailing List] Set backend for Apache userdirs
2013-01-07 16:11, Alan McGinlay skrev: Hi, I am trying to find a good way to redirect example.com/~username to a specific backend (which will run apache and nfs mounted home directories) in order to keep users public_html and nfs mounts off of our main webserver. We also have multiple domains pointing at the same backend but I would like the userdirs to only be available via one of them so that example.com/~bob works but otherexample.com/~bob does not. So far I have this: Service HeadRequire ^Host:\s*www.example.se.* URL /~* BackEnd Address userdirhost Port80 End Emergency Address localhost Port 9090 End End Followed by: Service HeadRequire ^Host:\s*www.example.se.* BackEnd Address standardbackend Port81 End Emergency Address localhost Port 9090 End End However, although this allows the userdir to work, it also completely breaks the second entry.. Any advice? Thanks, Alan -- To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to pound@apsis.ch. Please contact ro...@apsis.ch for questions. I found the following similar question on the archives: http://www.apsis.ch/pound/pound_list/archive/2009/2009-03/1236583386000 However it doesn't seem to work (ldd shows pound compiled against pcre libs). with the original configuration i posted, browsing to site.com/ redirects to the userdir server and gives a 404. Browsing to site.com/~user does NOT redirect to the userdir server and gives a 404 generated on the normal webserver but if i add a trailing slash to that url then it redirects to the userdir server correctly and shows the users content.. Not sure what the heck is going on here or how to debug it :( -- To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to pound@apsis.ch. Please contact ro...@apsis.ch for questions.
Re: [Pound Mailing List] Proxy a request to new URL
Hi, This is not a feature supported by pound. Assuming you are using Apache, you can use rewrites as follows: RewriteRule ^old/(.*)/$ http://example.com/new/app/$1 [R=301,L] /Alan Den tis 8 jan 2013 17:37:03 skrev Derr, Alex: Hi, I am attempting to proxy some image files from an old URL to the new while redirecting the old URL to the new. See below: Old URL: example.com/old/images/image.gif New URL: example.com/*new/app/*images/image.gif This configuration: Service URL “^/old.*” Redirect “https://example.com/new/app” End Only redirects me to the home page of the new URL (https://example.com/new/app), and the end of the URI (/images/image.gif) is lost. How can I get pound to redirect to the new URL and keep the end of the URI string? Thanks! Alex -- To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to pound@apsis.ch. Please contact ro...@apsis.ch for questions.
[Pound Mailing List] Set backend for Apache userdirs
Hi, I am trying to find a good way to redirect example.com/~username to a specific backend (which will run apache and nfs mounted home directories) in order to keep users public_html and nfs mounts off of our main webserver. We also have multiple domains pointing at the same backend but I would like the userdirs to only be available via one of them so that example.com/~bob works but otherexample.com/~bob does not. So far I have this: Service HeadRequire ^Host:\s*www.example.se.* URL /~* BackEnd Address userdirhost Port80 End Emergency Address localhost Port 9090 End End Followed by: Service HeadRequire ^Host:\s*www.example.se.* BackEnd Address standardbackend Port81 End Emergency Address localhost Port 9090 End End However, although this allows the userdir to work, it also completely breaks the second entry.. Any advice? Thanks, Alan -- To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to pound@apsis.ch. Please contact ro...@apsis.ch for questions.
[Pound Mailing List] SSL_CTX_use_PrivateKey_file Driving me insane
Hi All, I have been getting this error now no matter what I do when trying to setup and HTTPS listener with a self signed cert. /etc/pound/pound.cfg line 56: SSL_CTX_use_PrivateKey_file failed - aborted I have generated the ssl cert in myriad different ways, always with the same result. I have tried with pound 2.5 and 2.6 (from ubuntu precise and quantal respectively) but there is no change! The certificates test ok with the openssl command line so I am at a complete loss! Most of the info I have found on the net is from a few years back, could this be a new bug? pound.cfg listeners: ListenHTTP Address 199.10.64.8 Port80 #Cert/etc/ssl/certs/server.crt Service HeadRequire Host:.*redneck001-ext.example.se.* BackEnd Address localhost Port81 End End END ListenHTTPS Address 193.10.64.8 Port443 Cert/etc/ssl/certs/redneck001-ext.example.se.cert Service HeadRequire Host:.*redneck001-ext.example.se.* BackEnd Address localhost Port81 End End End Please help! /Alan -- To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to pound@apsis.ch. Please contact ro...@apsis.ch for questions.
Re: [Pound Mailing List] SSL_CTX_use_PrivateKey_file Driving me insane
Fixed! thanks for the link, it put me on the right track. All that was required was to concatenate the key, the crt and output a .pem file which i put in the ssl store and referenced it from pound.cfg. I also ran update-ca-certificates --verbose --fresh And restarted pound, success! This is just a test, the live site will use a real ssl cert. Thanks, Alan 2012-09-27 11:57, Scott McKeown skrev: Hi Alan, I'm sure that you will need to include the Private Key Chain in your PEM file to resolve this error. Have a look at http://www.digicert.com/ssl-support/pem-ssl-creation.htm which shows the different ways of creating the PEM file. Although now that I think about it, I don't remember if I had to include this in mine the last time I created a Self Signed certificate so I could be wrong on the self signed front. However, I would recommend the full PEM file when you go live. ~Scott On 27 September 2012 10:16, Alan McGinlay al...@sics.se mailto:al...@sics.se wrote: Hi All, I have been getting this error now no matter what I do when trying to setup and HTTPS listener with a self signed cert. /etc/pound/pound.cfg line 56: SSL_CTX_use_PrivateKey_file failed - aborted I have generated the ssl cert in myriad different ways, always with the same result. I have tried with pound 2.5 and 2.6 (from ubuntu precise and quantal respectively) but there is no change! The certificates test ok with the openssl command line so I am at a complete loss! Most of the info I have found on the net is from a few years back, could this be a new bug? pound.cfg listeners: ListenHTTP Address 199.10.64.8 Port80 #Cert/etc/ssl/certs/server.crt Service HeadRequire Host:.*redneck001-ext.__example.se.* BackEnd Address localhost Port81 End End END ListenHTTPS Address 193.10.64.8 Port443 Cert/etc/ssl/certs/redneck001-__ext.example.se.cert Service HeadRequire Host:.*redneck001-ext.__example.se.* BackEnd Address localhost Port81 End End End Please help! /Alan -- To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to pound@apsis.ch mailto:pound@apsis.ch. Please contact ro...@apsis.ch mailto:ro...@apsis.ch for questions. -- With Kind Regards. Scott McKeown Loadbalancer.org http://www.loadbalancer.org -- To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to pound@apsis.ch. Please contact ro...@apsis.ch for questions.
Re: [Pound Mailing List] Puppet pound module
Hi, Now that I have been working with pound a little I have realised that my puppet module is overly focused on my own use case (and not very well at that). I would like to make it usable for alternative scenarios and how I split up the module code depends on what sort of range of use cases there are out there. It would be really awesome if I could see some different config examples from real world sites using pound. I think my own use case is one of the more common ones but it's still only using a tiny bit of the features of pound and the rest aren't currently covered by the module at all. If you could send me some example configs I would really appreciate it. I will update the module to cover as many as possible and if your site is using puppet then it can only benefit you :) /A 2012-09-25 13:15, Alan McGinlay skrev: Hi, I have created a Puppet module for the Pound service. It is both my first attempt at a puppet module and also the first time I have seriously used Pound. https://github.com/mrintegrity/puppet-pound It is pretty basic at the moment but covers the most basic usage requirements. I would really love to get some feedback and suggestions for new features. Thanks, Alan -- To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to pound@apsis.ch. Please contact ro...@apsis.ch for questions. -- To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to pound@apsis.ch. Please contact ro...@apsis.ch for questions.
[Pound Mailing List] Puppet pound module
Hi, I have created a Puppet module for the Pound service. It is both my first attempt at a puppet module and also the first time I have seriously used Pound. https://github.com/mrintegrity/puppet-pound It is pretty basic at the moment but covers the most basic usage requirements. I would really love to get some feedback and suggestions for new features. Thanks, Alan -- To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to pound@apsis.ch. Please contact ro...@apsis.ch for questions.
Re: [Pound Mailing List] redirect to holding page?
You are probably looking for the Emergency Backend feature: Emergency Directives enclosed between an Emergency and the following End directives define an emergency back-end server (see below for details). You may define only one emergency server per service, which Pound will attempt to use if all backends are down. ^ from the manpage. /A 2012-09-25 14:25, mark hardwick skrev: Hi all I've had a look in the docs but can't see this. Is it possible for pound to redirect to a holding page (on some other server) if all web servers in a service are down? Cheers Mark. -- To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to pound@apsis.ch. Please contact ro...@apsis.ch for questions. -- To unsubscribe send an email with subject unsubscribe to pound@apsis.ch. Please contact ro...@apsis.ch for questions.
