[issue47212] Minor issues in reported Syntax errors
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: New changeset aa0f056a00c4bcaef83d729e042359ddae903382 by Matthieu Dartiailh in branch 'main': bpo-47212: Improve error messages for un-parenthesized generator expressions (GH-32302) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/aa0f056a00c4bcaef83d729e042359ddae903382 -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue47212> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue47213] Incorrect location of caret in SyntaxError
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: No, the location is correct, the string for 'a' is actually closed after the a. This makes a list with the following elements: 'a ,' b', ' c', ' As "b" is a valid prefix for string (bytes) it doesn't fail there, but 'c' isn't so you get the syntax error. -- resolution: -> not a bug stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue47213> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue47147] Allow `return yield from`
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: I concur with Terry. -- resolution: -> rejected stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue47147> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue47131] Speedup test_unparse
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: New changeset 0f68c208fa6a36b6c8ad3d775e64292a665ba108 by Jeremy Kloth in branch 'main': bpo-47131: Speedup AST comparisons in test_unparse by using node traversal (GH-32132) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/0f68c208fa6a36b6c8ad3d775e64292a665ba108 -- nosy: +pablogsal ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue47131> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue47126] Update to canonical PEP URLs
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- stage: resolved -> patch review ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue47126> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue47126] Update to canonical PEP URLs
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue47126> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue34861] Improve cProfile standard output
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: New changeset 75eee1d57eb28283a8682a660d9949afc89fd010 by Daniël van Noord in branch 'main': bpo-34861: Make cumtime the default sorting key for cProfile (GH-31929) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/75eee1d57eb28283a8682a660d9949afc89fd010 -- nosy: +pablogsal ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue34861> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue47126] Update to canonical PEP URLs
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: New changeset 6881ea936e277b1733bee581c4e59e3a5d53bb29 by Hugo van Kemenade in branch 'main': bpo-47126: Update to canonical PEP URLs specified by PEP 676 (GH-32124) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/6881ea936e277b1733bee581c4e59e3a5d53bb29 -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue47126> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue47137] MemoryError in codeop.compile_command
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: > I suspect backporting the fix to older versions won't be possible. Yeah, very much the case unfortunately -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue47137> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue47147] Allow `return yield from`
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: In general, anything changing the python syntax needs to be discussed in the mailing lists and it may likely need a PEP as well, even if is minor. This is because this has consequences rippling the whole ecosystem, from IDEs to other parsers and this need to be discussed, and communicated in a better forum than this. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue47147> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue47147] Allow `return yield from`
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: Please, submit an email to python-ideas or python-dev first as this need to be discussed in the mailing lists. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue47147> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue47117] repl segfaults on non utf-8 input
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: Thanks for the report, Jon! -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue47117> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue47117] repl segfaults on non utf-8 input
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: New changeset 27ee43183437c473725eba00def0ea7647688926 by Pablo Galindo Salgado in branch '3.10': [3.10] bpo-47117: Don't crash if we fail to decode characters when the tokenizer buffers are uninitialized (GH-32129) (GH-32130) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/27ee43183437c473725eba00def0ea7647688926 -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue47117> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue47117] repl segfaults on non utf-8 input
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- pull_requests: +30210 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/32130 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue47117> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue47117] repl segfaults on non utf-8 input
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: Ah yes, we have been defeated by half an emoji :) -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue47117> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue47117] repl segfaults on non utf-8 input
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +30209 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/32129 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue47117> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue47129] Improve errors messages in f-string syntax errors
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- nosy: +eric.smith ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue47129> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46838] Parameters and arguments parser syntax error improvments
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: New changeset 7d810b6a4eab6eba689acc5bb05f85515478d690 by Pablo Galindo Salgado in branch 'main': bpo-46838: Syntax error improvements for function definitions (GH-31590) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/7d810b6a4eab6eba689acc5bb05f85515478d690 -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46838> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46968] Insufficient sigaltstack size used by CPython prevents extensions from using new ISA
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46968> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46968] Insufficient sigaltstack size used by CPython prevents extensions from using new ISA
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: New changeset 6fd9737373f2bed03f409440b4fd50b9f8f121cb by Pablo Galindo Salgado in branch '3.10': [3.10] bpo-46968: Check for 'sys/auxv.h' in the configure script (GH-31961). (GH-31974) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/6fd9737373f2bed03f409440b4fd50b9f8f121cb -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46968> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46968] Insufficient sigaltstack size used by CPython prevents extensions from using new ISA
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: New changeset a12ef81231d65da5efbef4fa1434716270a19af6 by Pablo Galindo Salgado in branch '3.9': [3.9] bpo-46968: Check for 'sys/auxv.h' in the configure script (GH-31961). (GH-31975) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/a12ef81231d65da5efbef4fa1434716270a19af6 -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46968> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46968] Insufficient sigaltstack size used by CPython prevents extensions from using new ISA
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- pull_requests: +30065 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/31975 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46968> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46968] Insufficient sigaltstack size used by CPython prevents extensions from using new ISA
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- pull_requests: +30064 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/31974 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46968> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue47043] Argparse can't parse subparsers with parse_known_args
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- nosy: -pablogsal ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue47043> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46968] Insufficient sigaltstack size used by CPython prevents extensions from using new ISA
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- pull_requests: +30049 stage: resolved -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/31961 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46968> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46968] Insufficient sigaltstack size used by CPython prevents extensions from using new ISA
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: This may be quite bad, because this means that 3.10 and 3.9 doesn't build in CentOS 6, which is used for manylinux2010 wheels -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46968> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46968] Insufficient sigaltstack size used by CPython prevents extensions from using new ISA
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- priority: normal -> release blocker ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46968> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46968] Insufficient sigaltstack size used by CPython prevents extensions from using new ISA
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: The configure file is checking for "linux/auxvec.h" checking linux/auxvec.h usability... yes but the code is including "sys/auxvec.h" -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46968> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46968] Insufficient sigaltstack size used by CPython prevents extensions from using new ISA
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: The code is assuming that if linux/auxvec.h then sys/auxv.h will be available, which is wrong. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46968> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46968] Insufficient sigaltstack size used by CPython prevents extensions from using new ISA
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: We may need to revert these commits and do another release sigh :( -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46968> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46968] Insufficient sigaltstack size used by CPython prevents extensions from using new ISA
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: This is problematic because this has been backported to stable releases. -- nosy: +lukasz.langa ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46968> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46968] Insufficient sigaltstack size used by CPython prevents extensions from using new ISA
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: Commit 393e2bf6bc6effbfe821f051a230978f0edd70df has broken CPython in RedHat 6: [2022-03-16T18:49:20.608Z] 2022/03/16 14:48:55 ERROR /tmp/python3.10-3.10.3-0/Modules/faulthandler.c:28:12: fatal error: sys/auxv.h: No such file or directory # include ^~~~ compilation terminated. -- nosy: +pablogsal resolution: fixed -> status: closed -> open ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46968> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46948] [CVE-2022-26488] Escalation of privilege via Windows Installer
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: The 3.11.0a6 release is ongoing. I assume is ok to not block this release on this issue, given that an alpha is inherently unsafe -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46948> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46936] Fix grammar_grapher with the new forced directive
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46936> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46940] Suggestion messages don't properly work in nested getattr calls
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46940> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46940] Suggestion messages don't properly work in nested getattr calls
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: New changeset 3594ebca2cacf5d9b5212d2c487fd017cd00e283 by Pablo Galindo Salgado in branch '3.10': [3.10] bpo-46940: Don't override existing AttributeError suggestion information (GH-31710) (GH-31724) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/3594ebca2cacf5d9b5212d2c487fd017cd00e283 -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46940> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46910] Compiler errors that happen before syntax errors are not reported first
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: > My main concern is that the door not be closed on improving the user > experience relating to this behaviour of the compiler. Is not closed, if someone has a good idea they can reopen this issue (the issue is not deleted). > By the way, I see these improvements being done as a third-party pure-Python > module outside Python's Standard Library, at least until they've reached a > wide measure of community acceptance. You can reach to André Roberge, the author of "friendly" and "friendly-traceback" (https://github.com/friendly-traceback/friendly-traceback) which is a fantastic 3rd party package in these lines. -- resolution: wont fix -> not a bug title: Expect IndentationError, get SyntaxError: 'break' outside loop -> Compiler errors that happen before syntax errors are not reported first ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46910> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46940] Suggestion messages don't properly work in nested getattr calls
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- pull_requests: +29840 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/31724 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46940> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46940] Suggestion messages don't properly work in nested getattr calls
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: New changeset 3b3be05a164da43f201e35b6dafbc840993a4d18 by Pablo Galindo Salgado in branch 'main': bpo-46940: Don't override existing AttributeError suggestion information (GH-31710) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/3b3be05a164da43f201e35b6dafbc840993a4d18 -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46940> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46940] Suggestion messages don't properly work in nested getattr calls
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +29829 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/31710 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46940> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46940] Suggestion messages don't properly work in nested getattr calls
New submission from Pablo Galindo Salgado : Consider this code: class A: __slots__ = [ "_color", ] color = None @property def color(self): return self._color A().color Executing this shows: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/pgalindo3/lel.py", line 21, in A().color File "/Users/pgalindo3/lel.py", line 18, in color return self._color AttributeError: 'A' object has no attribute '_color'. Did you mean: '_color'? This is because the nested getattr call of "@property" overrides the metadata information in the exception object and it tries to produce an error message for the attribute "color" instead of "_color". -- assignee: pablogsal messages: 414623 nosy: pablogsal priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Suggestion messages don't properly work in nested getattr calls versions: Python 3.10, Python 3.11 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46940> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46910] Expect IndentationError, get SyntaxError: 'break' outside loop
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: Unfortunately that's not how the parser works. I insist, for the compiler to raise the propper error the parser needs to succeed first. That would require us to modify the input string in arbitrary ways (many times we don't know exactly what went wrong) and recompile an arbitrary number of times. I'm very sorry, but I will leave this issue closed as "won't fix" as the complexity of this solution is too much for the given benefit. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46910> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46910] Expect IndentationError, get SyntaxError: 'break' outside loop
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: Unfortunately, we cannot do much here. The reason is that the parser allows break and continue outside loops as they count as statements. As these are associated with control flow, is the compiler the one that will show the Syntax warning once it tries to make sense of the abstract syntax tree that the parser generates. The error you are getting happens because for the parser, the unindented else *is* a syntax error so it fails much sooner and prevents the compiler to complain about the break. This means that in the presence of two syntax errors, one being a parser error and the other a compiler error, the parser will always be first, no matter if the other one appears before in the code. Given this, I am afraid we need to close this issue as "won't fix" :( Bing said that, if someone devises some easy way to do this without major changes everywhere, I am happy to reopen it -- resolution: -> wont fix stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46910> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46902] Typo hint message for from-imports?
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: I evaluated this, but is considerably more complex than the regular import, because one triggers an attribute error where we have the full module but in the second case we don't have the full module ready, so it requires considerable modifications. I will investigate again if there is a way that doesn't require lots of changes, but is likely that we unfortunately need to reject this improvement :( -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46902> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46841] Inline bytecode caches
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: > OOI, does it become a "blocker" again once you've done the alpha release, or > what stops it being deferred past the beta or even the final release? Check out the devguide: https://devguide.python.org/triaging/#priority > The issue will not hold up the next release, n. It will be promoted to a > release blocker for the following release, n+1. But in any case, I normally promote them to release blockers by hand and all of them become full blockers in the beta. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46841> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46841] Inline bytecode caches
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: > Is there some way to mark something as not blocking an alpha release, but > blocking a beta release? "Deferred blocker" -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46841> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46890] venv does not create "python" link in python 3.11
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: Ok, marking is at "deferred blocker" -- priority: release blocker -> deferred blocker ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46890> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46841] Inline bytecode caches
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- priority: release blocker -> deferred blocker ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46841> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46891] Crash in ModuleType subclass with __slots__
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: Marking this as release blocker. -- priority: normal -> release blocker ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46891> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue44446] linecache.getline TypeError when formatting tracebacks in stacks containing an async list comprehension
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: This was fixed in 3.10.0 if I am not mistaken. Could you provide a reproducer, please? -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue6> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46756] Incorrect authorization check in urllib.request
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: I'm closing this, please reopen if something is missing. -- priority: release blocker -> resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46756> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46756] Incorrect authorization check in urllib.request
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: New changeset 1c9701a3de0566c085e03dddc14a8508aaae349e by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.8': bpo-46756: Fix authorization check in urllib.request (GH-31353) (GH-31572) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/1c9701a3de0566c085e03dddc14a8508aaae349e -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46756> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46756] Incorrect authorization check in urllib.request
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: Is something left here, it seems that most PRs are landed -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46756> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46841] Inline bytecode caches
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: This is marked as a release blocker so I am holding the alpha release on this. Is there anything we can do to unblock this issue? -- nosy: +pablogsal ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46841> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46890] venv does not create "python" link in python 3.11
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: This is marked as a release blocker so I am holding the alpha release on this. Is there anything we can do to unblock this issue? -- nosy: +pablogsal ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46890> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46756] Incorrect authorization check in urllib.request
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: This is marked as a release blocker so I am holding the alpha release on this. Is there anything we can do to unblock this issue? -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46756> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46885] Ensure PEP 663 changes are reverted from 3.11
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: > we need to ensure that the changes made in 3.11 (see > https://github.com/python/steering-council/issues/76#issuecomment-970668967) > are rejected. Apologies, I meant "we need to ensure that the changes made in 3.11 are **reverted**. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46885> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46885] Ensure PEP 663 changes are reverted from 3.11
New submission from Pablo Galindo Salgado : As PEP 663 https://github.com/python/steering-council/issues/76 was rejected, we need to ensure that the changes made in 3.11 (see https://github.com/python/steering-council/issues/76#issuecomment-970668967) are rejected. I am marking this as a release blocker so we don't forget. -- assignee: ethan.furman messages: 414214 nosy: ethan.furman, pablogsal priority: release blocker severity: normal status: open title: Ensure PEP 663 changes are reverted from 3.11 versions: Python 3.11 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46885> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46838] Parameters and arguments parser syntax error improvments
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +29713 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/31590 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46838> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46567] Add Tcl/Tk builds for ARM64
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: I don't mind waiting a couple of days. We have also at least one release blocker as well, so is not even sure that we will be ready in time :S -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46567> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46838] Parameters and arguments parser syntax error improvments
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: Thanks a lot for the suggestions! I will try to give these a go to see if we can get them implemented. Parameter parsing is a bit hairy so not sure how lucky we will be but all of them make sense! -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46838> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46725] Unpacking without parentheses is allowed since 3.9
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46725> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46725] Unpacking without parentheses is allowed since 3.9
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: What happened is that the new grammar using the PEG parser used the equivalent of starred_testlist instead of testlist for the iterable list of for statements. The only extra thing allowed is starred elements, that are interpreted as if you are building a tuple without parentheses. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46725> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46725] Unpacking without parentheses is allowed since 3.9
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +29612 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/31481 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46725> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46820] SyntaxError on `1not in...`
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- nosy: +serhiy.storchaka ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46820> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46783] Add a new feature to enumerate(iterable, start=0) built-in function
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: This has nothing to do with the parser so I'm removing the label. Please, next time make sure you select the appropriate categories when opening an issue -- components: -Parser ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46783> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46762] assertion failure in f-string parsing Parser/string_parser.c
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46762> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46762] assertion failure in f-string parsing Parser/string_parser.c
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: Thanks for the quick fix, Eric! -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46762> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46502] Py_CompileString no longer allows to tell "incomplete input" from "invalid input"
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: Cool! Be aware that using it outside codeop is currently unsupported: https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/5d53cf30f9cb3758849e859db5d4602cb7c521f7/Lib/codeop.py#L43-L47 So have in mind that the flag, mechanism and semantics can change without previous notice -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46502> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46735] gettext.translations crashes when locale is unset
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- nosy: -pablogsal ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46735> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46704] Parser API not checking for null-terminator
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: Closing as not a bug. Please, feel free to reopen if we missed something. Thanks for the report! -- resolution: -> not a bug stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46704> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46725] Unpacking without parentheses is allowed since 3.9
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: Will prepare a PR -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46725> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46725] Unpacking without parentheses is allowed since 3.9
New submission from Pablo Galindo Salgado : Seems that this is allowed since the PEG parser rewrite: for x in *a, *b: print(x) but I cannot find anywhere were we discussed this. I am not sure if we should keep it or treat it as a bug and fix it. -- components: Parser messages: 413089 nosy: BTaskaya, gvanrossum, lys.nikolaou, pablogsal priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Unpacking without parentheses is allowed since 3.9 versions: Python 3.10, Python 3.11, Python 3.9 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46725> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46707] Parser hanging on stacked { tokens
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: Thanks Anthony for the report! -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46707> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46707] Parser hanging on stacked { tokens
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: New changeset 9b23f8f78fdb0d7eba016616ae7a97abbfc65aa6 by Pablo Galindo Salgado in branch '3.10': [3.10] bpo-46707: Avoid potential exponential backtracking in some syntax errors (GH-31241). (GH-31242) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/9b23f8f78fdb0d7eba016616ae7a97abbfc65aa6 -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46707> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46707] Parser hanging on stacked { tokens
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46707> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46707] Parser hanging on stacked { tokens
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- pull_requests: +29412 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/31242 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46707> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46707] Parser hanging on stacked { tokens
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: New changeset b71dc71905ab674ccaa4a56230d17a28f61c325c by Pablo Galindo Salgado in branch 'main': bpo-46707: Avoid potential exponential backtracking in some syntax errors (GH-31241) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/b71dc71905ab674ccaa4a56230d17a28f61c325c -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46707> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46707] Parser hanging on stacked { tokens
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +29411 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/31241 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46707> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46704] Parser API not checking for null-terminator
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: The contract of that interface is to receive null-terminated strings, so I am a bit clueless on how this could receive a non-null terminated string. Notice that calling PyRun_StringFlags with a non-null terminated string is out of contract. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46704> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46704] Parser API not checking for null-terminator
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- Removed message: https://bugs.python.org/msg412970 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46704> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46704] Parser API not checking for null-terminator
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: The contract of that interface is to receive null-terminated strings, so I am a bit clueless on how this could receive a non-null terminated string. Notice that calling CompileCode with a non-null terminated string is out of contract. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46704> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46704] Parser API not checking for null-terminator
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: Could you please provide an example input to reproduce this? -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46704> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46703] boolean operation issue (True == False == False)
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: This is not a bug. Please check the docs on the ternary operator: https://docs.python.org/3/reference/expressions.html#comparisons In particular: Comparisons can be chained arbitrarily, e.g., x < y <= z is equivalent to x < y and y <= z, except that y is evaluated only once (but in both cases z is not evaluated at all when x < y is found to be false). THis means that True == False == False is really True == False and False == False wich is False and True which is False -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46703> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46703] boolean operation issue (True == False == False)
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- Removed message: https://bugs.python.org/msg412963 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46703> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46703] boolean operation issue (True == False == False)
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: This is not a bug. Please check the docs on the ternary operator: https://docs.python.org/3/reference/expressions.html#comparisons In particular: Comparisons can be chained arbitrarily, e.g., x < y <= z is equivalent to x < y and y <= z, except that y is evaluated only once (but in both cases z is not evaluated at all when x < y is found to be false). THis means that True == False == False is really True == False and True == False wich is False and False which is False -- resolution: -> not a bug stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46703> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue43366] Unclosed bracket bug in code.interact prevents identifying syntax errors
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed versions: +Python 3.11 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue43366> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue43366] Unclosed bracket bug in code.interact prevents identifying syntax errors
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: This has been fixed by commit 69e10976b2e7682c6d57f4272932ebc19f8e8859: Python 3.11.0a5+ (heads/main:69e10976b2, Feb 8 2022, 12:30:20) [Clang 12.0.0 (clang-1200.0.32.29)] on darwin Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> import code >>> code.interact() Python 3.11.0a5+ (heads/main:69e10976b2, Feb 8 2022, 12:30:20) [Clang 12.0.0 (clang-1200.0.32.29)] on darwin Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. (InteractiveConsole) >>> [ ... def foo(): File "", line 1 [ ^ SyntaxError: '[' was never closed Please, check that everything is in order and reopen the issue if we have missed something. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue43366> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46521] codeop._maybe_compile passes code with error + triple quotes
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: I am not backporting to 3.9 because the parser is different enough that introducing this would also introduce some unintended side effects. -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46521> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46521] codeop._maybe_compile passes code with error + triple quotes
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: New changeset 5b58db75291cfbb9b6785c9845824b3e2da01c1c by Pablo Galindo Salgado in branch '3.10': [3.10] bpo-46521: Fix codeop to use a new partial-input mode of the parser (GH-31010). (GH-31213) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/5b58db75291cfbb9b6785c9845824b3e2da01c1c -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46521> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46521] codeop._maybe_compile passes code with error + triple quotes
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- pull_requests: +29383 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/31213 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46521> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46521] codeop._maybe_compile passes code with error + triple quotes
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: New changeset 69e10976b2e7682c6d57f4272932ebc19f8e8859 by Pablo Galindo Salgado in branch 'main': bpo-46521: Fix codeop to use a new partial-input mode of the parser (GH-31010) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/69e10976b2e7682c6d57f4272932ebc19f8e8859 -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46521> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46674] Two if in a row in generators
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: Please, stop reopening the issue. The syntax is valid python syntax and we will not be able to make it invalid -- resolution: -> not a bug status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46674> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46633] AddressSanitizer: Skip tests directly in Python, not with external config
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: I have recently added some decorators in test. support to deactivate tests if running under the sanitizers. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46633> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46600] Python built with clang -O0 allocates 10x more stack memory than clang -O3 on a Python function call
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: PR 31052 seems to have broken a bunch of buildbots. If no fix is provided in 24 hours, we will need to revert :( -- nosy: +pablogsal ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46600> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46521] codeop._maybe_compile passes code with error + triple quotes
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: > The message is off That's because the tokenizer sees the error before the parser even has time to see the other one. Not sure if is technically anything to fix here other than the order of reporting two different errors, which may be a bit tricky to fix. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46521> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46521] codeop._maybe_compile passes code with error + triple quotes
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: If we want to go with this approach, I am going to need help to fix test_idle as I have no idea why is failing if test_codeop passes. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46521> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46521] codeop._maybe_compile passes code with error + triple quotes
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: Ugh, the approach to do that breaks super heavily test_idle :( -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46521> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46329] Split up the CALL_NO_KW and CALL_KW instructions.
Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: I'm reverting PR30855 for the time being given our buildbot policy. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46329> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46329] Split up the CALL_NO_KW and CALL_KW instructions.
Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- Removed message: https://bugs.python.org/msg412088 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46329> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
