[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Éric Araujo]

Éric Araujo  added the comment:

Both active PRs have comments pointing out issues, that’s why this is still 
open.  A clean fix with unit tests and no regression is needed.

--
nosy: +eric.araujo
versions: +Python 3.10, Python 3.11, Python 3.9 -Python 3.6, Python 3.7, Python 
3.8

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Christoph Zwerschke]

Christoph Zwerschke  added the comment:

Just created a test case for this problem after a pentest provoked this error 
on one of my web apps. Then I found this bug report which already has a similar 
test case attached.

The problem is that read_binary() as the name says reads binary data, but then 
writes it to a file which may or may not be binary, depending on whether 
self._binary_file is set, which depends on whether a filename was set via the 
content-disposition header.

Jakub's patch looks good and works for me. Please merge this!

--

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Bradley Miller]

Bradley Miller  added the comment:

Thanks Jakub,

Your patch fixed an increasingly frequent problem with my site.  

How can I help to get this merged so I don't have to have a custom version of 
cgi.py??

--
nosy: +bnmnetp

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Jakub Kulik]

Jakub Kulik  added the comment:

We internally tested the most recent PR and found some issues with it:
https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/21457#issuecomment-698845895

We ended up using a much simpler patch, which seems to work as expected.

--- Python-3.7.8/Lib/cgi.py
+++ Python-3.7.8/Lib/cgi.py
@@ -703,7 +703,10 @@
 if not data:
 self.done = -1
 break
-self.file.write(data)
+if self._binary_file:
+self.file.write(data)
+else:
+self.file.write(data.decode())
 todo = todo - len(data)
 
 def read_lines(self):

--
nosy: +kulikjak

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Rhodri James]

Change by Rhodri James :


--
nosy:  -Rhodri James

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Aron Podrigal]

Change by Aron Podrigal :


--
pull_requests: +20604
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/21457

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Tim Nyborg]

Tim Nyborg  added the comment:

Echoing Fran Boon, I'm wondering what needs to happen to get the fixes merged 
and this issue resolved.  It affects web servers run on several frameworks, 
which is more of a problem now, since so many of us migrated to py3 in advance 
of py2 EOL.

--
nosy: +Tim Nyborg2

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Fran Boon]

Fran Boon  added the comment:

What is happening with this bug?
I am amazed that nearly 4 years on it doesn't seem to have been resolved.
The issue took me a fairly long time to debug the cause of, but once known the 
issue seems relatively simple to resolve & there are a couple of Pull Requests 
which fix the issue. This is my first time looking into the core of Python's 
own development (which I guess is a testament to how well this normally works), 
so I may be being naive, but what is the blocker here? Is there anything I can 
do to help? Test/Review existing PRs? (They both look good to me)
Create a new PR? (Seems unnecessary)

I really am genuinely keen to help resolve this for at least Python 3.7+ (Am 
aware that 3.6 is security fixes only)

--
nosy: +Fran Boon

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Ethan Furman]

Change by Ethan Furman :


--
assignee:  -> ethan.furman
nosy: +Rhodri James, ethan.furman
versions:  -Python 3.5

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Christoph Zwerschke]

Christoph Zwerschke  added the comment:

This also happens when sending POST requests with JSON payload from a browser 
with XMLHttpRequest to a Python 3.7 backend using FieldStorage. It seems 
XMLHttpRequest adds the content length automatically.

--

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Christoph Zwerschke]

Change by Christoph Zwerschke :


--
nosy: +cito

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Edward Gow]

Edward Gow  added the comment:

This bug is triggered by xml-rpc calls from the xmlrpc.client in the Python 3.5 
standard library to a mod_wsgi/Python 3.5 endpoint.

--
nosy: +elgow

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Aron Podrigal]

Aron Podrigal  added the comment:

A different approach. Always honor content length, and do not try to read more 
than.

--

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Roundup Robot]

Change by Roundup Robot :


--
pull_requests: +11715, 11716, 11717, 11718

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Roundup Robot]

Change by Roundup Robot :


--
pull_requests: +11715, 11716, 11717

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Roundup Robot]

Change by Roundup Robot :


--
pull_requests: +11715, 11716

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Roundup Robot]

Change by Roundup Robot :


--
pull_requests: +11715

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Rémi Lapeyre]

Change by Rémi Lapeyre :


--
nosy: +remi.lapeyre

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Aron Podrigal]

Aron Podrigal  added the comment:

I am experiencing  the same issue. 
https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/10771 looks good.


While were at it, and if PR 10771 is accepted, maybe we can change 
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/6613b56173d26f32da9945691ff9f824304224a2/Lib/cgi.py#L717
 to `read` instead of `readline` since we anyway read till EOF.

--
nosy: +Aron Podrigal

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Pierre Quentel]

Pierre Quentel  added the comment:

I have submitted another Pull Request (10771) that seems to fix the bug while 
passing all the tests in test_cgi.py

--
nosy: +quentel

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Pierre Quentel]

Change by Pierre Quentel :


--
pull_requests: +10015

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Jack Jansen]

Change by Jack Jansen :


--
nosy: +jackjansen

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Chris Eykamp]

Chris Eykamp  added the comment:

I don't know if you've read the dialog on the PR (there was also some offline 
between Ned and myself), but the patch breaks a test when running under a fresh 
build of Python.  I can't reproduce it here without setting up a build system, 
which I haven't had time to do, and won't be able to do at leat through the end 
of next week.

If you can run the tests on a fresh build of Python, and confirm that they 
break, that would be helpful.

--

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Bert JW Regeer]

Bert JW Regeer  added the comment:

I'll take a look and see if I can get the other fixes from WebOb and add them 
to a patch, and create a follow-up PR.

If I can stop carrying a monkey patch for the standard library I am all for it!

Thanks for running with this!

--
nosy: +Bert JW Regeer

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Chris Eykamp]

Chris Eykamp  added the comment:

Packaged patch offered below into PR 7804

https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/7804

--
versions: +Python 3.5

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Chris Eykamp]

Change by Chris Eykamp :


--
pull_requests: +7409

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Chris Eykamp]

Chris Eykamp  added the comment:

I'll get a PR submitted this weekend, and post back here.  It will not 
explicitly address that other case, as I don't have the capacity or wherewithal 
for that.  Alas.

--

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Berker Peksag]

Berker Peksag  added the comment:

That's even better! :) Please submit your work as a pull request.

Did you take a look at https://github.com/Pylons/webob/pull/300 as well? Can we 
use the test in the PR? Is it possible to adapt it solve both this and WebOb 
issues?

--

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Chris Eykamp]

Chris Eykamp  added the comment:

I've already got a PR based on the patch listed under the Files section (it's 
prepared, not yet submitted), but if you want to do something more, I'll step 
back and let you do it.

--

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Berker Peksag]

Berker Peksag  added the comment:

Thank you for the ping, Chris. I will try to combine Bert's and Julien's 
patches and prepare a PR this weekend.

--
versions: +Python 3.8 -Python 3.5

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[STINNER Victor]

Change by STINNER Victor :


--
nosy:  -vstinner

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Chris Eykamp]

Chris Eykamp  added the comment:

This also manifests itself when using web.py: if the underlying code throws an 
exception, this is emitted:

  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.5/dist-packages/web/webapi.py", line 364, in 
input
out = rawinput(_method)
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.5/dist-packages/web/webapi.py", line 341, in 
rawinput
a = cgi.FieldStorage(fp=fp, environ=e, keep_blank_values=1)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.5/cgi.py", line 561, in __init__
self.read_single()
  File "/usr/lib/python3.5/cgi.py", line 740, in read_single
self.read_binary()
  File "/usr/lib/python3.5/cgi.py", line 762, in read_binary
self.file.write(data)
TypeError: write() argument must be str, not bytes

--

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Chris Eykamp]

Chris Eykamp  added the comment:

I've been experiencing the same issue, which is triggered in the exception 
handling of web.py.

Bert's proposed fix, adding the zero byte check (if self._binary_file or 
self.length >= 0:) addresses the issue I'm seeing (tested on 3.5, it's what's 
available where I can reproduce the error).

This issue seems to be languishing.  Is there any way we could push this 
forward, even if it doesn't address every problem with the lib?

--
nosy: +watusimoto

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Sebastian Rittau]

Change by Sebastian Rittau :


--
nosy: +srittau

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Bert JW Regeer]

Bert JW Regeer added the comment:

Unfortunately I need to spin another patch, the one I created didn't solve the 
issue for one of WebOb's users:

https://github.com/Pylons/webob/pull/300 (Thanks Julien Meyer!)

I have his permission to grab his test/patch and update this patch, I will get 
this done later today.

That being said, this is a real issue, and WebOb will be shipping a fix for 
Python less than 3.6 anyway, so whether this gets released in 3.6 or not 
doesn't matter to me. I'd prefer this to be fixed in the standard library for 
all users, rather than just for WebOb users.

Even if this were released for 3.6.1, WebOb will have to carry the fix for the 
foreseeable future.

--

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Ned Deily]

Ned Deily added the comment:

Berker asks in IRC whether this change should go into 3.6.0 (at rc1).  While it 
is affecting a relatively self-contained part of the standard library (cgi), 
the issue doesn't seem to be "release critical".  Further, it is changing 
behavior that was changed barely a year ago for Issue24764.  My preference 
would be to try to have this change reviewed and/or tested by at least some of 
the people involved with the earlier issue and, if there is a consensus for it, 
target the change for 3.6.1.

--
nosy: +ned.deily

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Berker Peksag]

Changes by Berker Peksag :


--
stage: needs patch -> patch review

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Bert JW Regeer]

Bert JW Regeer added the comment:

@berker.peksag:

Attached is a patch with a test case that exercises this issue.

Code path is that read_single() checks if the length is greater than 0, and 
then it reads binary, otherwise it reads it as a single line. This fixes 
make_file so that if self.length is greater than or equal to 0, it opens the 
file in binary mode, this matches the checks that write stuff as binary.

This also undoes the change that was made in 
https://bugs.python.org/issue24764. Fixing this issue fixed that one as well, 
and arguably throwing data away doesn't seem like a good idea.

--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file45527/bug2.patch

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Berker Peksag]

Berker Peksag added the comment:

Thanks for triaging this, Bert. Would you like to propose a patch with a test 
case?

Note that we can't fix this in 3.3 and 3.4 because they are in 
security-fix-only mode. See 
https://docs.python.org/devguide/index.html#status-of-python-branches for 
details.

--
stage:  -> needs patch
type:  -> behavior
versions:  -Python 3.3, Python 3.4

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Bert JW Regeer]

Bert JW Regeer added the comment:

Updated versions this applies to.

--
versions: +Python 3.3, Python 3.4, Python 3.6, Python 3.7

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Bert JW Regeer]

Changes by Bert JW Regeer :


--
nosy: +berker.peksag

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Bert JW Regeer]

Bert JW Regeer added the comment:

On line #890 in self.make_file() the check for _binary_file should be changed 
to also check for self.length >= 0.

https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/3.4/Lib/cgi.py#L890

becomes:

if self._binary_file or self.length >= 0:

_binary_file is only ever set if there is a content disposition, which there is 
not in the test case provided. In the case of no content disposition we can use 
the content-length as a hint that we have a file that has been uploaded. All 
files uploaded should be treated as binary if they are not a text type.

This is a duplicate of #27308, however the patch in that report is incorrect 
IMHO.

--
nosy: +X-Istence, haypo

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Decorater]

Decorater added the comment:

Here is a patch to review (note I only had disc space to clone 3.6 so I had to 
manually download this version of the file).

--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file44125/cgi.py

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[Decorater]

Decorater added the comment:

hmm into looking it should check if it is in actuality a binary file the length 
of the file data does not really determine anything on encoding really.

if self._binary_file:

would suffice on determining binary mode or not.

--
nosy: +Decorater

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

[rr-]

New submission from rr-:

Sending requests with Content-Length but without Content-Disposition headers 
causes following error:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "./test", line 19, in 
form = cgi.FieldStorage(fp=env['wsgi.input'], environ=env)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.5/cgi.py", line 561, in __init__
self.read_single()
  File "/usr/lib/python3.5/cgi.py", line 740, in read_single
self.read_binary()
  File "/usr/lib/python3.5/cgi.py", line 762, in read_binary
self.file.write(data)
TypeError: write() argument must be str, not bytes

I've attached a test file that reproduces the issue.

The issue is because read_single decides whether to read the content as binary 
or text depending on content-length - if it's > 0, it uses read_binary which 
assumes binary input, and rewrites this input to self.file, assuming self.file 
is opened in binary mode.

At the same, self.file is opened in text mode, because self._binary_file is set 
to False, which in turn is because there's no Content-Disposition header.

At very least, the decision whether to use binary or text should be consistent 
in both places (self.length >= 0 vs self._binary_file).

Related: https://bugs.python.org/issue27308
Note that unlike https://bugs.python.org/issue24764 this issue does NOT concern 
multipart requests.

--
components: Library (Lib)
files: test
messages: 272856
nosy: rr-
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no 
Content-Disposition
versions: Python 3.5
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file44124/test

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com