[issue8041] No documentation for Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_STACKLESS_EXTENSION or Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_VERSION_TAG.

[pmp-p]

Change by pmp-p :


--
nosy: +pmpp

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue8041] No documentation for Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_STACKLESS_EXTENSION or Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_VERSION_TAG.

[Irit Katriel]

Change by Irit Katriel :


--
versions: +Python 3.10, Python 3.8, Python 3.9 -Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 
3.3

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue8041] No documentation for Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_STACKLESS_EXTENSION or Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_VERSION_TAG.

[Mark Lawrence]

Change by Mark Lawrence :


--
nosy:  -BreamoreBoy

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue8041] No documentation for Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_STACKLESS_EXTENSION or Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_VERSION_TAG.

[Mark Lawrence]

Mark Lawrence added the comment:

@Daniel could you supply a patch for this?

--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8041
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue8041] No documentation for Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_STACKLESS_EXTENSION or Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_VERSION_TAG.

[Daniel Stutzbach]

Daniel Stutzbach dan...@stutzbachenterprises.com added the comment:

I think if they are mentioned, they should be documented.  Removing mention of 
them would be fine with me.

Looking at this again, I think the description of Py_TPFLAGS_DEFAULT is no 
longer accurate.  It reads: This is a bitmask of all the bits that pertain to 
the existence of certain fields in the type object and its extension 
structures. Currently, it includes the following bits: 
Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_STACKLESS_EXTENSION, Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_VERSION_TAG.

But neither of those flags pertain to the existence of certain fields, do they?

Perhaps it should simply read: This bitmask should be set by all types to 
define certain bits used internally by Python.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8041
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue8041] No documentation for Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_STACKLESS_EXTENSION or Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_VERSION_TAG.

[Antoine Pitrou]

Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:

I don't think these flags need documenting or even deserve mentioning. 
Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_STACKLESS_EXTENSION seems to be two bits reserved for use by 
Stackless, while Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_VERSION_TAG should be considered by extension 
authors an internal implementation detail (in normal circumstances, it won't 
impact how they have to write their code or the semantics of their extension 
types).

--
nosy: +pitrou

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8041
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue8041] No documentation for Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_STACKLESS_EXTENSION or Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_VERSION_TAG.

[Mark Lawrence]

Changes by Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk:


--
assignee: georg.brandl - d...@python
nosy: +d...@python

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8041
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue8041] No documentation for Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_STACKLESS_EXTENSION or Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_VERSION_TAG.

[Daniel Stutzbach]

New submission from Daniel Stutzbach dan...@stutzbachenterprises.com:

The documentation for Py_TPFLAGS_DEFAULT mentions 
Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_STACKLESS_EXTENSION and Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_VERSION_TAG, but 
neither of them is documented.  They aren't mentioned in the 2.6 documentation 
(presumably because they were introduced in 3.x?).

http://docs.python.org/dev/py3k/c-api/typeobj.html?highlight=py_tpflags_have_gc#Py_TPFLAGS_DEFAULT

--
assignee: georg.brandl
components: Documentation
messages: 100298
nosy: georg.brandl, stutzbach
severity: normal
status: open
title: No documentation for Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_STACKLESS_EXTENSION or 
Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_VERSION_TAG.
versions: Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8041
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com