Re: [R-SIG-Mac] M1 mid-January update
On 14/01/2021 11:32, Jean Thioulouse wrote: Is there a large speed difference for linear algebra operations between the Rosetta x86_64 builds and the native arm64 builds ? On a Mac mini M1 8/256 I get only a slight speed increase (15% faster) with the arm version (experimental R-devel build). Speed differences were covered in an earlier report so please look in the list archive. Speeds are really dependent (for both Intel and ARM) on the load on the machine and the size of the task: typically the ARM version is 40% faster, with a very wide range. Thanks Jean Le 14 janv. 2021 à 08:41, Prof Brian Ripley a écrit : For native builds - nothing to report for x86_64 builds running under Rosetta which almost all the time 'just work' (and work fast). The goal remains to release a native binary distribution with R 4.1.0 ca April: all but the intrepid are advised to use x86_64 until then. - There is an experimental R-devel build of the R framework at https://mac.r-project.org/ . That page reports 'failed' but usually the framework is complete. - R.app will need to be partially re-written as it uses Objective C features which are no longer supported in Xcode 12. (I guess this is why the page is reporting a failure.) - There are most parts of a toolchain and a Fortran compiler at https://mac.r-project.org/libs-arm64/ (not the earlier versions at libs-arm). These install into /opt/R/arm64, and the R-admin manual has been re-written to reflect that and point out some pitfalls. - Binary packages are planned but the vast majority of packages install from source. I currently have 240 CRAN check failures with 35 failing to install and 98 others requiring those (or BioC ones). If you are interested in a particular package, https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/bdr/M1mac/ has recent logs for those failing directly, listed as 'additional issues' on their CRAN check pages. -- Brian D. Ripley, rip...@stats.ox.ac.uk Emeritus Professor of Applied Statistics, University of Oxford ___ R-SIG-Mac mailing list R-SIG-Mac@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mac -- Brian D. Ripley, rip...@stats.ox.ac.uk Emeritus Professor of Applied Statistics, University of Oxford ___ R-SIG-Mac mailing list R-SIG-Mac@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mac
Re: [R-SIG-Mac] M1 mid-January update
Is there a large speed difference for linear algebra operations between the Rosetta x86_64 builds and the native arm64 builds ? On a Mac mini M1 8/256 I get only a slight speed increase (15% faster) with the arm version (experimental R-devel build). Thanks Jean > Le 14 janv. 2021 à 08:41, Prof Brian Ripley a écrit : > > For native builds - nothing to report for x86_64 builds running under Rosetta > which almost all the time 'just work' (and work fast). > > The goal remains to release a native binary distribution with R 4.1.0 ca > April: all but the intrepid are advised to use x86_64 until then. > > - There is an experimental R-devel build of the R framework at > https://mac.r-project.org/ . That page reports 'failed' but usually the > framework is complete. > > - R.app will need to be partially re-written as it uses Objective C features > which are no longer supported in Xcode 12. (I guess this is why the page is > reporting a failure.) > > - There are most parts of a toolchain and a Fortran compiler at > https://mac.r-project.org/libs-arm64/ (not the earlier versions at libs-arm). > These install into /opt/R/arm64, and the R-admin manual has been re-written > to reflect that and point out some pitfalls. > > - Binary packages are planned but the vast majority of packages install from > source. I currently have 240 CRAN check failures with 35 failing to install > and 98 others requiring those (or BioC ones). If you are interested in a > particular package, https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/bdr/M1mac/ has recent logs > for those failing directly, listed as 'additional issues' on their CRAN check > pages. > > -- > Brian D. Ripley, rip...@stats.ox.ac.uk > Emeritus Professor of Applied Statistics, University of Oxford > > ___ > R-SIG-Mac mailing list > R-SIG-Mac@r-project.org > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mac ___ R-SIG-Mac mailing list R-SIG-Mac@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mac
[R-SIG-Mac] M1 mid-January update
For native builds - nothing to report for x86_64 builds running under Rosetta which almost all the time 'just work' (and work fast). The goal remains to release a native binary distribution with R 4.1.0 ca April: all but the intrepid are advised to use x86_64 until then. - There is an experimental R-devel build of the R framework at https://mac.r-project.org/ . That page reports 'failed' but usually the framework is complete. - R.app will need to be partially re-written as it uses Objective C features which are no longer supported in Xcode 12. (I guess this is why the page is reporting a failure.) - There are most parts of a toolchain and a Fortran compiler at https://mac.r-project.org/libs-arm64/ (not the earlier versions at libs-arm). These install into /opt/R/arm64, and the R-admin manual has been re-written to reflect that and point out some pitfalls. - Binary packages are planned but the vast majority of packages install from source. I currently have 240 CRAN check failures with 35 failing to install and 98 others requiring those (or BioC ones). If you are interested in a particular package, https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/bdr/M1mac/ has recent logs for those failing directly, listed as 'additional issues' on their CRAN check pages. -- Brian D. Ripley, rip...@stats.ox.ac.uk Emeritus Professor of Applied Statistics, University of Oxford ___ R-SIG-Mac mailing list R-SIG-Mac@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mac
