Re: sbuild: please add the srebuild sbuild wrapper to reproduce builds
On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 07:27:36PM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: > this bug has been listed in the "NMU campaign" email on d-devel. But I wonder > how it ended up there. That's just an UDD query… But I wonder whether this bug should be tagged as "infrastructure" (which would have avoid it being listed)... > fix for this is still blocked by another bug (#802241) which is not on the NMU > list, umh… that's weird, that one definitly should be in the list (even if clearly we don't want to NMU dpkg!) udd=> select * from bugs_usertags where id=802241; email|tag| id -+---+ reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org | toolchain | 802241 (1 row) guess there is a bug in my SQL query (on top of the bug_list file attached to the d-d mail) -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
sbuild: please add the srebuild sbuild wrapper to reproduce builds
Hi, this bug has been listed in the "NMU campaign" email on d-devel. But I wonder how it ended up there. There are still open problems that are not answered, the fix for this is still blocked by another bug (#802241) which is not on the NMU list, and the code I wrote to fix the problem (debrebuild) is still waiting for a maintainer. So how did sbuild end up on the NMU list? I do not see what you want to NMU. Thanks! cheers, josch signature.asc Description: signature ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Re: NMU campagin
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 02:32:50PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Please review it and let's discuss here the bits you do not agree about > the plan. Alright, so everybody liked the plan and only wording changes happened. ISTM that there are actually fewer packages/bugs than what I thought, only 404 bugs reduced to 348 when filtering for the "older than 6 months" thing... but well, let's get those down as well :) > Also, I haven't written it there, but I'd like to take this occasion to > also upload changes ragarding other projects: > * multi-arch hints, as found in tracker.d.o > * crossbuild and bootsrap patches, as filed in the bts by helmut > * MIA uploaders removal, as filed in the bts > * some depraction bugs, like the recent automake1.11 ones (but there >are more, like several debhelper-related) > I think a campagin like this where we are probably going to upload > hundreds of packages to be a great chance at tackling those things as > well. I hope you agree as well on this :) FWIW, I plan to give until next week to see if anybody screams before starting myself ^^ -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
NMU campaign for Reproducible Builds patches
Hi people, As we mentioned in our recent report[0], we have realised just how many of the patches we have submitted[1] have been regrettably unacknowledged or otherwise have not uploaded to Debian. That's why are planning a NMU campaign to lower the number of open reproducible bugs. We have already NMUed packages in the past (notably for packages in the essential set) but we have mostly left maintainers to pick up the patches at their own pace up to now. At the end of this "campaign" we expect to see a significant drop in the number of unreproducible packages as we are talking about roughly 300 packages here which, whilst being only less than a third of the unreproducible packages in Buster, contains several "toolchain" packages, affecting more than themselves. Also, whilst we hope this campaign will have a huge impact, we're also doing it to better be be able to focus on the remaining —harder— unreproducible packages. Naturally, we promise to follow the NMU rules[2] in particular regarding the DELAYED queue: we plan to do all of our uploads for the wishlist bugs (the vast majority of them) to DELAYED/15. Also, for now we are going to target only bugs filed more than 6 months ago; attached is a list of the affected bugs, and a dd-list of affected packages. If you do not wish for us to upload your packages, please consider reviewing and possibly uploading our patches as soon as possible, or leave a message in the bug report stating so. We currently plan to start sometime during DebConf (or DebCamp), without any specific priority or rate. Best wishes, Mattia Rizzolo Chris Lamb Holger Levsen PS: no, this time Jenkins will not do anything, all the NMU work will be carried out by humans! [0] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2017/07/msg4.html [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org;exclude=pending:done https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/index_bugs.html [2] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html#nmu -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- Adam Conradinitramfs-tools (U) Adrian Knoth libffado (U) Agustin Henze doit Al Stone libevocosm Alastair McKinstry console-data Alberto Capella Silva tcpreen Alejandro Garrido Mota cclive Alejandro Garrido Mota libquvi Alen Zekulic the Ales Zabala Alava (Shagi) txt2tags (U) Alessio Treglia idjc (U) masscan tsdecrypt (U) Alexander Wirt asciidoc (U) file-rc (U) iproute2 (U) keepalived Alexandre Dantas nsnake snake4 Andrea Colangelo tennix Andreas Barth netpbm-free Andreas Beckmann module-assistant (U) Andreas Henriksson iproute2 (U) Andreas Tille mc (U) Andrew Shadura aspell-sk (U) Andrew Starr-Bochicchio libgtk2-appindicator-perl (U) Andrey Rahmatullin hibernate Anibal Monsalve Salazar elida libtext-charwidth-perl mpack pciutils sensible-utils ssmtp uswsusp (U) Anselm Lingnau abcm2ps Ansgar Burchardt cclive (U) libquvi (U) quvi Antoine Beaupré bugs-everywhere (U) Anton Zinoviev console-data (U) Anton Zinoviev console-setup (U) Antonio Radici libhtml-lint-perl (U) Antonio Terceiro goaccess (U) mailman-api Apollon Oikonomopoulos python-hiredis (U) Ari Pollak gtkspell Aurelien Jarno fonts-dustin (U) openhackware (U) Axel Beckert amora-server zsh (U) Barak A. Pearlmutter bbdb (U) jacal Bartosz Fenski reaver Bastien Roucariès imagemagick (U) Ben Hutchings initramfs-tools (U) kernel-handbook (U) Ben Wong zssh Benda Xu oss4 (U) Bernd Zeimetz freeipmi (U) gmic pyicu (U) viking Bernhard R. Link cuyo Bernhard Schmidt torrus (U) Boris Pek uhub
Re: [rb-general] Please review the draft for week 118's blog post
Chris Lamb wrote: > Please review the draft for week 118's blog post: Now published at https://reproducible.alioth.debian.org/blog/posts/118/ Many thanks all! Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb, Debian Project Leader `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `- ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds