[GitHub] spark issue #22370: don't link to deprecated function

2018-09-11 Thread MichaelChirico
Github user MichaelChirico commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22370
  
@felixcheung thanks for the feedback, yes, I axed `registerTempTable` from 
the `SparkDataFrame `@family`. 

Sorry I botched an attempt to try and rename the branch of this PR 
(apparently not possible to overwrite this PR with a new branch name); PR 
re-filed as #22393


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #22370: don't link to deprecated function

2018-09-10 Thread felixcheung
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22370
  
I don’t feel strongly either way.

I do think this is very minor since there are still many other ways to the 
doc page for createExternalTable (eg the index page) or via ? search within R 
etc. I am not sure how much difference this would make and we have already a) 
code spewing out warning when called b) clearly documented as Deprecated on the 
doc page title.

Should you find other deprecation that is not documentation we should be 
gladly having your help
to document it.



---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #22370: don't link to deprecated function

2018-09-10 Thread MichaelChirico
Github user MichaelChirico commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22370
  
@felixcheung I disagree... what's the point of deprecation if it's going to 
keep being considered as a co-equal function in the eyes of documentation?

If the function is being deprecated, it should be "soft-blacklisted" -- 
documentation still available (but clearly marked) for users of "legacy" code 
where its usage still survives, but I don't see any argument for even letting 
new users find out a deprecated function exists.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #22370: don't link to deprecated function

2018-09-08 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22370
  
Can one of the admins verify this patch?


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #22370: don't link to deprecated function

2018-09-08 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22370
  
Can one of the admins verify this patch?


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #22370: don't link to deprecated function

2018-09-08 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22370
  
Can one of the admins verify this patch?


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org