[sane-devel] CanoScan N650U / FreeBSD

2007-03-10 Thread marc+sane...@milestonerdl.com
I am trying to get a Cannon CanoScan N 650U working on FreeBSD 6.2-CURRENT.

The scanner SEEMS to be seen, but normal VS root shows a difference.

As a mortal User:

$ sane-find-scanner -q
found USB scanner (UNKNOWN vendor and product) at device /dev/uscanner0


As root
lap# sane-find-scanner -q
found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9, product=0x2206) at /dev/uscanner0
lap# scanimage -L

No scanners were identified. If you were expecting something different,
check that the scanner is plugged in, turned on and detected by the
sane-find-scanner tool (if appropriate). Please read the documentation


lap# kldstat 
Id Refs AddressSize Name
 1   17 0xc040 714dc4   kernel
 22 0xc0b15000 22c48sound.ko
 31 0xc0b38000 9958 snd_uaudio.ko
 41 0xc0b42000 598bcacpi.ko
 52 0xc376b000 9000 ibcs2.ko
 61 0xc3776000 3000 ibcs2_coff.ko
 72 0xc3779000 16000linux.ko
 81 0xc39df000 3000 daemon_saver.ko
 91 0xc3dea000 6000 linprocfs.ko
lap# 

Xsane configs

$ grep -v ^# /usr/local/etc/sane.d/plustek.conf | grep -v option
device /dev/uscanner0
usb  0x04a9  0x2206 
$ grep plustek /usr/local/etc/sane.d/dll.conf
plustek
#plustek_pp
$ 

So what did I miss?


[sane-devel] Hello!

2007-03-10 Thread Stéphane VOLTZ
Le jeudi 8 mars 2007, Daniel Padula a ?crit?:
 My name is Daniel, first of all, I am sorry for my english, I am from
 argentina.

 I am working on a linux distribution and I need to make Lexmark x1270 work,
 using Debian Testing.

 When I plug it, its detected by sane as 1100 series, and when I try to
 scan, its seems that try to move itself to a wrong side and even I cannot
 turn it off, it hang up, I have to turn it off by unplugging.

 How can I make it work ? Is it possible? Any suggestion is accepted.

 I really appreciate your help.

 Daniel Padula


Hello,

I am currently working to add support to X1200 models in the 
experimental 
version of the lexmark backend. I excpect to put a version able to park head 
and do a color preview by the start of next week. 

Regards,
Stef


[sane-devel] Canon LiDE 20: Awful noise after/before scans

2007-03-10 Thread Marc Hansen
Hi Gerhard,
maybe there is also the problem fixed, that I'm not able to scan under Debian?

Am Donnerstag 08 M?rz 2007 07:29:22 schrieb Gerhard Jaeger:
 On Donnerstag, 8. M?rz 2007, eugenia wrote:
  Did Gerhard ever receive the scanner and reproduce the problem?

 [SNIPSNAP]

 I got the device and the problem is fixed.

Is the fix somewhere in cvs?

Thank you
Marc


[sane-devel] Formulardaten

2007-03-10 Thread cgi-mai...@kundenserver.de


===
== Neuer Eintrag
===

  
---
-- Formular: 'adddev'
---

1. Your email address:
   'lkorts+s...@gmail.com'
2. Manufacturer (e.g. Mustek):
   'Canon'
3. Model name (e.g. ScanExpress 1200UB):
   'LiDe 600f'
4. Bus type:
   'USB'
5. Vendor id (e.g. 0x001):
   '0x04a9'
6. Product id (e.g. 0x0002):
   '0x2224'
7. Chipset (e.g. lm9831):
   ''
8. Comments (e.g. similar to Mustek 1234):
   'Unit bought from Japan, Akihabara on March 10th,  2007

Using debian testing/unstable
sane-find-scanner finds it but scanimage -L doesn't

'
9. Data (e.g. sane-find-scanner -v -v):
   'device descriptor of 0x04a9/0x2224 at 005:031 (Canon CanoScan)
bLength   18
bDescriptorType   1
bcdUSB2.00
bDeviceClass  255
bDeviceSubClass   255
bDeviceProtocol   255
bMaxPacketSize0   64
idVendor  0x04A9
idProduct 0x2224
bcdDevice 0.00
iManufacturer 1 (Canon)
iProduct  2 (CanoScan)
iSerialNumber 0 ()
bNumConfigurations1
 configuration 0
 bLength  9
 bDescriptorType  2
 wTotalLength 32
 bNumInterfaces   1
 bConfigurationValue  1
 iConfiguration   0 ()
 bmAttributes 160 (Remote Wakeup)
 MaxPower 500 mA
  interface 0
   altsetting 0
   bLength9
   bDescriptorType4
   bInterfaceNumber   0
   bAlternateSetting  0
   bNumEndpoints  2
   bInterfaceClass255
   bInterfaceSubClass 255
   bInterfaceProtocol 255
   iInterface 0 ()
endpoint 0
bLength   7
bDescriptorType   5
bEndpointAddress  0x02 (out 0x02)
bmAttributes  2 (bulk)
wMaxPacketSize512
bInterval 0 ms
bRefresh  0
bSynchAddress 0
endpoint 1
bLength   7
bDescriptorType   5
bEndpointAddress  0x83 (in 0x03)
bmAttributes  2 (bulk)
wMaxPacketSize512
bInterval 0 ms
bRefresh  0
bSynchAddress 0

trying to find out which USB chip is used
checking for GT-6801 ...
this is not a GT-6801 (bcdUSB = 0x200)
checking for GT-6816 ...
this is not a GT-6816 (bDeviceClass = 255, bInterfaceClass = 255)
checking for GT-8911 ...
this is not a GT-8911 (check 1, bDeviceClass = 255, bInterfaceClass = 255)
checking for MA-1017 ...
this is not a MA-1017 (bDeviceClass = 255, bInterfaceClass = 255)
checking for MA-1015 ...
this is not a MA-1015 (bcdUSB = 0x200)
checking for MA-1509 ...
this is not a MA-1509 (bcdUSB = 0x200)
checking for LM983[1,2,3] ...
this is not a LM983x (bcdUSB = 0x200)
checking for GL646 ...
this is not a GL646 (bDeviceClass = 255, bInterfaceClass = 255)
checking for GL646_HP ...
this is not a GL646_HP (bcdUSB = 0x200)
checking for GL660+GL646 ...
this is not a GL660+GL646 (bDeviceClass = 255, bInterfaceClass = 255)
checking for GL841 ...
this is not a GL841 (bNumEndpoints = 2)
checking for ICM532B ...
this is not a ICM532B (check 2, bcdUSB = 0x200)
checking for PV8630/LM9830 ...
this is not a PV8630/LM9830 (bDeviceClass = 255)
checking for M011 ...
this is not a M011 (bcdUSB = 0x200)
checking for RTS8822L-01H ...
this is not a RTS8822L-01H (bDeviceClass = 255)
checking for rts8858c ...
this is not a rts8858c (bDeviceClass = 255)
checking for SQ113 ...
this is not a SQ113 (bDeviceClass = 255)
Couldn't determine the type of the USB chip (result from sane-backends 1.0.18)

found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x2224 [CanoScan]) at 
libusb:005:031
'


[sane-devel] Fujitsu M3093DG new driver

2007-03-10 Thread Steve Brown
Allan has fixed the driver in the current cvs.

My M3093DGdim version 02 is now working perfectly in both front  
duplex.  The scanner doesn't support back only.

Thanks Allan.

I believe this thread is closed.

Steve