[sane-devel] Canon MP710/740 support request

2008-02-10 Thread Gernot Hassenpflug
Hello,

I'm about ready to try and use USB snooping under windows to get
information abut my MP710 (740 is same except adds fax capability).
Nicholas, sinceyou so kindly offered to add the IDs for the MP470,
could you add the following to your driver as well so I can try it
out?

found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon Inc.], product=0x264d [MP710])
at libusb:004:003

Many thanks in advance,
   Gernot Hassenpflug
   Tokyo, Japan



[sane-devel] Canon MP710/740 support request

2008-02-10 Thread nicols

Hi,

MP710 which is similar to MP740, look to be from the same generation as
MP730 ?
It could be worth trying to use current MP730 Sane driver on your MP710, and
see how it goes ?

In that case, I can easily produce a test driver version for MP710 to use
MP730 driver, that you could try.


Gernot Hassenpflug-4 wrote:
 
 Hello,
 
 I'm about ready to try and use USB snooping under windows to get
 information abut my MP710 (740 is same except adds fax capability).
 Nicholas, sinceyou so kindly offered to add the IDs for the MP470,
 could you add the following to your driver as well so I can try it
 out?
 
 found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon Inc.], product=0x264d [MP710])
 at libusb:004:003
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Canon-MP710-740-support-request-tp15392016p15394965.html
Sent from the SANE - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.




[sane-devel] Canon MP710/740 support request

2008-02-10 Thread nicols

Could you try the following Pixma package. Download it from sendspace.com at
the following link:

http://www.sendspace.com/file/ogro4h http://www.sendspace.com/file/ogro4h 

And use instructions given on this blog to install and test it:

http://mp610.blogspot.com/2007/11/new-sane-scanner-driver-for-canon-mp610.html
http://mp610.blogspot.com/ 



Gernot Hassenpflug-4 wrote:
 
 It could be worth trying to use current MP730 Sane driver on your MP710,
 and
 see how it goes ?
 
 OK. Give me a day or so.
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Canon-MP710-740-support-request-tp15392016p15396148.html
Sent from the SANE - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.




[sane-devel] Canon MP710/740 support request

2008-02-10 Thread Gernot Hassenpflug
On Feb 10, 2008 10:28 PM, nicols nicolas.martin at freesurf.fr wrote:

 Could you try the following Pixma package. Download it from sendspace.com at
 the following link:

 http://www.sendspace.com/file/ogro4h http://www.sendspace.com/file/ogro4h

Hello and thanks. Whew, I had just downloaded the sourceforge package...

 And use instructions given on this blog to install and test it:

 http://mp610.blogspot.com/2007/11/new-sane-scanner-driver-for-canon-mp610.html
 http://mp610.blogspot.com/

Done! (I had already read this page and others on your blog, and have
it permanently open in a browser tab. I am amazed by your work here,
thank you so much.)

~/Desktop/mp150-0.14.2-1u$ ./scan -x 10 -y 15 -w 51 -h 25 -1 -d 20 -W
pixmascan.pnm

[lots of stuff snipped, MP710 says on front panel scan mode]
...
[pixma-0.14.2] pixma_read_image():completed
100% done (33744 bytes written)
[pixma-0.14.2] pixma_close(): Canon MultiPASS MP710

So now I look at the image. Amazing, there is something there, a bit
grainy, but it certainly does work! Tick off another victory for your
[and the oirignal author's] driver and linux! :-)

Now I need to check what quality I can get with the options. Some questions:

1. resolution: -r number in the options. What is the suggestion when
the scanner does 1200x2400dpi? Is it possible to specify x and y
resolutions, or must I choose the lowest of the two.  At the moment
the highest resolution I can scan at is apparently 300 (by adding -r
600 to the test as follows):

./scan -x 10 -y 15 -w 51 -h 25 -1 -d 20 -r 300 -W pixmascan_r300.pnm

If I choose 600 it runs for quite a long time giving screen output but
finally cancels with a hardware error. And for 1200 the cancellation
happens quite quickly after starting with screen output.

I hope that information is useful, since I do not know how well the
driver performs on other scanners and with other OSes.

Now I will try to integrate the driver into xsane, and also see how it
does with scanning larger areas up to A4.
Best regards,
   Gernot



[sane-devel] Canon MP710/740 support request

2008-02-10 Thread Gernot Hassenpflug
On Feb 10, 2008 11:24 PM, Gernot Hassenpflug aikishugyo at gmail.com wrote:

 Now I will try to integrate the driver into xsane, and also see how it
 does with scanning larger areas up to A4.

Good news, using xsane I could scan an L-size photo and an A4 page in
full colour at 300dpi. anything above that works for a short while
before being cancelled by the hardware. Is is acceptable to post/email
the output file for small scan areas in the hope that this is a simple
timing/buffer problem or something?

Regards, Gernot



[sane-devel] Canon MP710/740 support request

2008-02-10 Thread Nicolas
Ok, great!

In order to debug the 600 and 1200 dpi, I will need the traces produces
by the driver in debug mode. 

For that:

- Recompile the driver with debug information:
$ make distclean
$ make

- Set the Sane debug variable to full debug mode , and run xsane from
the same console, to get the debug infos:
$ export SANE_DEBUG_PIXMA=10 ; xsane

- Then scan with xsane at 600 dpi, you should get lots traces in the
console of what's going on. 

- Put all this stuff in a text file, zip it, you can send it directly by
email to me (without sending to mailing list), I'll check that.
Then, I propose to send you some different files that will include
additional debug code, in order to better understand what's going on

Rgds,
Nicolas


Le dimanche 10 f?vrier 2008 ? 23:37 +0900, Gernot Hassenpflug a ?crit :

 On Feb 10, 2008 11:24 PM, Gernot Hassenpflug aikishugyo at gmail.com wrote:
 
  Now I will try to integrate the driver into xsane, and also see how it
  does with scanning larger areas up to A4.
 
 Good news, using xsane I could scan an L-size photo and an A4 page in
 full colour at 300dpi. anything above that works for a short while
 before being cancelled by the hardware. Is is acceptable to post/email
 the output file for small scan areas in the hope that this is a simple
 timing/buffer problem or something?
 
 Regards, Gernot
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20080210/7f6425e5/attachment.htm